OREGON — Oregon is officially a Tree City USA.

During the April 23 Oregon City Council meeting, City Manager Darin DeHaan presented Mayor Ken Williams with a plaque honoring the city’s designation, which was received last month.

“This has been a project that we started in 2021,” DeHaan said. “I’m proud of our community, proud of our mayor’s leadership and glad to present him this plaque.”

Getting the designation is a big deal, Williams said.

“In small, rural communities like Oregon, you always think of the tree-lined streets and the trees in the summer, and we feel like a community,” he said. “I love that. I’m glad we’re doing that, and I know we have resources set aside to help fund our tree policy and some of the things going with that.”

Tree City USA was created by the Arbor Day Foundation in 1976, according to ArborDay.org. A community can receive annual Tree City recognition by meeting four overarching standards:

1. Maintain a tree board or department.

City Council members unanimously voted to create the Oregon Tree Board on June 28, 2022. Members of the board met three times prior to its official creation.

2. Having a community tree ordinance.

A tree preservation regulations ordinance was unanimously approved by council members on Nov. 8, 2022.

3. Spending at least $2 per resident on urban forestry.

Oregon has a population of 3,604 according to the 2020 census, which means the city must spend at least $7,208 on tree removals, pruning and plantings annually.

In 2023, the city got a $4,700 grant to conduct a tree inventory, something which hadn’t been done since 1998.

4. Celebrating Arbor Day.

Illinois observes Arbor Day on the last Friday in April.

City officials were planning to plant a tree at the city’s wastewater treatment plant on Friday afternoon, but are rescheduling because of weather, DeHaan said. A new date has not yet been chosen.

Oregon was unable to gain Tree City USA status in 2023 because of deadlines.

So many months, meetings and miles later, the Broncos’ first-round plan proved so simple it translates into two letters.

Bo.

Denver set its course for the future and coach Sean Payton put his quarterback evaluation chops on the line in a major way Thursday night by selecting Oregon quarterback Bo Nix at No. 12.

Nix, a six-year college player who started 61 games and put up prodigious numbers the past two years running the Ducks offense, all along felt like a clean fit from a scheme standpoint. He was not, however, considered a particularly good value in the first half of the first round.

In recent years, however, quarterbacks have been picked earlier and earlier. Never faster and more furiously than this night.

USC’s Caleb Williams, LSU’s Jayden Daniels and North Carolina’s Drake Maye went in succession the first three picks. None of Washington, Chicago and New England, respectively, could be convinced to move off those opportunities.

Atlanta dropped the stunner and picked Washington’s Michael Penix Jr. at No. 8 two months after giving Kirk Cousins $100 million guaranteed. Then Minnesota moved up one spot to No. 10 to ensure it got the fifth quarterback of the night in Michigan’s J.J. McCarthy.

All the while, the Broncos were not concerned.

They waited out free agency. They waited out weeks of trade talks before acquiring Zach Wilson from the New York Jets on Monday for minimal cost. What’s a few more picks and a quintet of quarterbacks?

Payton said at the NFL scouting combine that his team would ace the quarterback evaluation process and other teams wouldn’t. Then he stood pat at No. 12 and had no qualms about taking the sixth quarterback of the night.

“It means a lot,” Nix said. “I can’t thank them enough for taking me, and for putting their belief in me. Like I said, there’s a lot in the future that’s going to need to be done — a lot of work to be done, a lot of growing and a lot of getting better. I just appreciate the value that they had in me.”

They left premium options for teams behind. They could have had Georgia tight end Brock Bowers. They could have had their pick of defensive players. The first didn’t come off the board until Indianapolis took UCLA pass-rusher Laiatu Latu at No. 15, the longest stretch of all offense to start a draft in NFL history.

Instead, they did what so much of the top half of the draft order did: took a swing at the game’s most important position.

The Broncos did extensive work on Nix throughout the process, just as they did with the other quarterbacks in the class. They didn’t have a loud presence at his pro day in March, but Sean Payton and company were in Eugene and held a lengthy private workout and meeting with him the next day.

“We talked a lot of football and we talked a lot about (Payton’s) scheme and what he’s done for so many years and how he’s been so successful,” Nix said. “It was a blast talking football, to be honest with you. It was a blast being in there with him and the other coaches. They brought a lot of guys out there to the private (meeting) and I was just very honored to have them around.”

The way the board fell provides a clean and compelling way to measure Denver’s process. Because Nix was the last of the six off the board, the Broncos will have either outfoxed and out-scouted a dozen other teams or it will look like they forced the issue and took a quarterback because they felt they had to take one.

The ramifications of that are equally clear and every bit as compelling: If Nix solves the eight-year quarterback conundrum this franchise has suffered through, this will be a defining night. The pick took no additional draft capital and leaves Payton and general manager George Paton with seven selections moving forward into the next two days to attack other areas of need. There are many.

If not, the wisdom of selecting a player most didn’t have among the draft’s premier talents will be questioned up and down for years. Could the Broncos have landed Nix later? Is he that much better than Spencer Rattler? How many touchdowns did Bowers catch for Las Vegas against Denver this year?

That’s the nature of making this bet. Payton put his first-rounder where his mouth was.

First-rounders have to produce regardless of position, but especially when it’s a quarterback and especially when a team hasn’t made one since 2021.

If Nix learns to operate Payton’s offensive system the way he did Oregon’s, the Broncos will benefit for years to come. If he ends up performing like a typical sixth quarterback taken in a draft, Denver will likely continue to lag far behind in a division that features two of the game’s best quarterbacks in Patrick Mahomes and Justin Herbert.

No pressure.

QB Bo Nix, Oregon

Round/pick: 1st/No. 12

Age: 24

Height/weight: 6-foot-2/217 pounds

College: Oregon

Hometown: Pinson, Ala.

Notable: Nix is one of the most experienced quarterbacks in this year’s draft class, playing in 61 career games and recording 15,352 passing yards, 113 touchdowns and 26 interceptions. A four-star recruit out of high school and ranked the best dual-threat quarterback in the 2019 class by 247sports, Nix spent three seasons at Auburn before transferring to Oregon and becoming a college football superstar. He totaled 8,101 passing yards, 74 touchdowns and 10 picks in two seasons with the Ducks, posting a 22-5 record.

Want more Broncos news? Sign up for the Broncos Insider to get all our NFL analysis.

The frontrunners to become Oregon’s next secretary of state, Treasurer Tobias Read and state Sen. James Manning, are running on broadly similar platforms, saying their top priority is to restore voters’ trust in an office whose last elected leader resigned amid scandal.

The two Democrats each point to professional experience they say proves they’re right for the job: Read cites his what he says has been steady, reliable leadership of a complex state agency, the treasury, while Manning points to his decades of service in the U.S. Army, where his work as an inspector general aligned with the audit function of the secretary of state.

Both candidates said they would work to protect Oregon’s vote by mail system and ensure the office conducts factual and data-driven audits of state agencies. The winner of the May Democratic primary will be heavily favored heading into the fall general election. Oregon voters have only elected a Republican to serve as secretary of state once since 1985, and Democrats currently hold every statewide elected office.

The election will take place just over a year after former Secretary of State Shemia Fagan resigned following Willamette Week’s revelation that she had taken a $10,000 a month consulting gig with an affiliate of embattled marijuana company La Mota while her office was auditing the cannabis industry.

Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade, whom Gov. Tina Kotek appointed to replace Fagan, is not running.

The secretary of state oversees elections, serves as the state’s chief auditor and heads the Oregon Corporation Division. They also sit on the Oregon State Land Board and chair the Oregon Sustainability Board. The elected agency head is first in line to become governor should the state’s top officeholder step down or die.

In making their cases to voters, Read has stressed his methodical leadership style while Manning has emphasized his commitment to integrity and public trust.

Read represented Beaverton in the Oregon House from 2007 until becoming state treasurer in 2017, rising to the powerful positions of speaker pro tempore and co-chair of the budget committee before announcing his candidacy for statewide office. He said his experience overseeing the state treasury qualifies him to take the reins as secretary of state. If elected, Read said he would explore programs to improve voter access and select which programs and agencies to audit based on data, not politics.

“A key part of my administration will be bringing the stability and performance that I’ve led as treasurer to the Secretary of State’s Office,” Read wrote in a response to an Oregonian/OregonLive questionnaire.

Read said he recognizes that he is not a flashy candidate but said his understated leadership style would be an asset for an office that has been in turmoil. He previously worked for Nike in product development and marketing roles from 2004 until 2012. During his time in the Legislature, he championed a bill that funded full-day kindergarten. In 2022, Read ran for governor but lost to Kotek by a huge margin in the Democratic primary.

Manning, a U.S. Army veteran and state senator since his appointment in late 2016, said one of his priorities in office would be to conduct thorough audits of agencies to address equity-related issues, such as the disproportionate hiring of men and a lack of racial diversity.

The secretary of state leads the Oregon Audits Division, which performs regular audits of state agencies and programs to measure their performance and effectiveness.

“A reporter once asked me, ‘You do know the secretary of state doesn’t pay a lot?’” Manning wrote in response to The Oregonian/OregonLive’s questionnaire. “I reminded them that serving 24 years active duty in the U.S. Army didn’t pay a lot either. I do it for the love of country and because it is public service.”

Manning said his experience as an assistant inspector general in the Army for three years and as the state Senate’s president pro tempore since 2021 have given him valuable experience. Manning retired from the Army in 2007 and moved to Eugene, where he served on nonprofit boards and school and local commissions, including six years as a member of the Eugene police commission, before joining the Legislature. He also served on Oregon’s Commission on Black Affairs from 2013 to 2017.

Read has brought in more than triple the campaign contributions of Manning.

Manning has raised nearly $200,000 and spent about $183,000. He’s received $20,000 from Stuart Barr, the owner of Eugene-based manufacturing company Industrial Finishes; $12,000 from advocacy organization Imagine Black; and $5,000 apiece from the political arm of the Native American Youth and Family Center, Oregon AFSCME, manufacturing company Greenhill Reload, real estate company ATR Services and political strategist Johnell Bell.

Read has brought in roughly $632,000 and spent about $234,000. The Democratic Lieutenant Governors Association gave him $26,250. Five other groups or individuals contributed $25,000: an Oregon electricians union; Gideon Yu, co-owner of the San Francisco 49ers and former CFO of Facebook; Eugene-based construction equipment company The Pape Group; Springboard Group, a Lake Oswego-based nonprofit that focuses on Yamhill County economic well-being and gives widely to political candidates; and Avamere Health Services, a senior health care and nursing home provider.

Dozens of lawmakers and notable Oregon politicians have endorsed a candidate in the race.

Manning has received endorsements from 20 Democratic state lawmakers, Oregon Planned Parenthood, the Oregon Sierra Club and the Oregon chapters of the Service Employees International Union and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

Read has received endorsements from 10 Democratic state lawmakers, former governors Barbara Roberts, Ted Kulongoski and John Kitzhaber, U.S. Reps. Suzanne Bonamici, Val Hoyle and Andrea Salinas, the Oregon Education Association and former Secretaries of State Jeanne Atkins and Phil Keisling.

Former attorney James Crary, retired attorney and former securities analyst Dave Stauffer and retired electrical engineer Paul Wells are also vying for the Democratic nomination. In response to a questionnaire from The Oregonian/OregonLive, Crary said he would focus on data and software audits to minimize agencies’ security risks and establish an electronic candidate forum, which voters could access to directly contact political candidates. If elected, Stauffer said he would work to fight misinformation and take his role of chief auditor seriously. Wells declined to respond to the candidate questionnaire.

The three Republicans competing for their party’s bid are state Sen. Dennis Linthicum, who cannot seek reelection to the Senate this year because of his participation in a Republican-led walkout of the Senate in 2023, small business owner Brent Barker and business analyst Tim McCloud. McCloud has not held office and unsuccessfully ran for governor in 2022. Barker also has not held office and unsuccessfully ran for labor commissioner in 2022.

All Republican candidates said they would attempt to end Oregon’s vote-by-mail system, if elected. Linthicum and McCloud said they believe voter fraud has impacted state and federal election results in recent years. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud at the state or federal level.

Plans to oversee audits, fight misinformation

If elected, Manning said he would lead the office by example and reduce corruption by setting an office-wide expectation of transparency. He said he would demand audits of state agencies with known problems, such as the Oregon Employment Department, which continues to struggle with long wait times and slow claims processing amid a transition to a new computer system.

Read said he would focus on protecting Oregonians’ right to vote and providing sufficient support to staff to ensure that audits are carefully selected and done with the right intentions. He said audits should not be driven “by a particular agenda, but by efficiency and effectiveness.”

One major task for the next secretary of state will be implementing historic limits on political contributions that lawmakers approved earlier this year. The new law calls for the Secretary of State’s Office to create a comprehensive dashboard to track campaign contributions and overhaul Orestar, Oregon’s online campaign finance reporting and disclosure system. Griffin-Valade told lawmakers earlier this year that the office will need more staff and money to get the job done.

Both Manning and Read said they support the desire of voters to limit political contributions and would ensure the bill is successfully carried out. Manning said he would seek long-term funding to support the overhaul of Orestar and “look to the some 36 states that have implemented [campaign finance reform] and propose best practices in regards to administration and guardrails to ensure bad actors are reigned in.”

Read said his experience rolling out complicated laws at the state treasury has prepared him to take on such a major task. Read has overseen the implementation of programs such as retirement-oriented OregonSaves, a system he advocated for while in the Legislature, and Oregon’s unclaimed property program.

“I will immediately roll up my sleeves, assess the capacity of the office and develop plans for implementation. My team and I know how to do this,” Read wrote. “I’m confident that with the appropriate budget and staffing, we will ensure the on-time rollout of a new transparent, publicly-accessible way for Oregonians to view campaign finance data.”

As the state’s chief elections officer, Manning said he would work to expand voters’ access to the ballot and protect Oregon’s voting system, but he did not outline specific strategies to do so. In the Legislature, he introduced or supported several bills to enhance voter access, such as a bill that died in a legislative committee this year that would have automatically registered college students to vote upon their enrollment.

“Oregon boasts the highest turnout in the nation yet we still have thousands of eligible students who remain unregistered as they are slipping through our … automatic voter registration systems,” Manning said.

If elected, Manning said he would conduct listening sessions at county election offices around the state to discuss ways to protect Oregon’s voting system and combat misinformation.

To improve Oregon’s voting system, Read said he would explore programs to increase voters’ confidence, such as establishing a statewide program that would text voters when their ballots are received and their votes counted and a program that would allow voters to see ballot-counting firsthand.

“Over the past six months, I have met with 24 of Oregon’s 36 county clerks to hear in part about strategies they have used to reach more voters, including satellite voting centers, increased translation services, ballot notification and outreach to rural voters in accessible locations,” Read said.

To combat misinformation, both Read and Manning said they would enhance transparency in the state’s voting system and invest in safety protocols for election workers. Read said he would do that “by not being afraid to stand up to misinformation campaigns and proving my commitment to transparency. I would also add that the safety of our election workers are under increasing threats, and I will be aggressive in protecting them.”

Manning said he would fight misinformation “through public service announcements and operating transparently in the office of secretary of state. … I will ensure investments are made in civics and in security, training and information delivery to and from our elections offices across our state.”

Oregon’s secretary of state has often taken on the additional task of redrawing the state’s congressional and legislative district boundaries after decennial census results come in. Similar to many other states, Oregon allows lawmakers to decide changes to its district boundaries, which they last redrew in 2021. However, lawmakers have only twice in the last century been able to approve new district boundaries, otherwise leaving the job to the secretary of state.

Good government groups have long advocated for an independent redistricting commission, arguing that Democrats as the legislative majority in 2021 redrew congressional districts in a way that gave them an unfair advantage, known as gerrymandering. A proposed ballot measure to create an independent redistricting commission was tabled earlier this year.

Read said he is open to the idea of establishing an independent commission, but he pointed out that independent panels of judges have consistently upheld redrawn boundaries decided by the Legislature or former secretary of states. He said, “I am not confident that any one system — an independent commission among them — represents a magic bullet.”

Manning said he likes the current system because lawmakers are fully accountable to voters and represent Oregon’s population better than an independent commission would.

“An unintended consequence of a so-called ‘independent commission’ appointed by lawmakers or the executive branch may be a way of removing accountability,” Manning said. “In a representative democracy, I find it appropriate that legislators are directly accountable to the people they represent.”

— Carlos Fuentes covers state politics and government. Reach him at 503-221-5386 or cfuentes@oregonian.com.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.