Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Review: Movies may be magic, but Sam Mendes’ ‘Empire of Light’ can’t conjure the illusion

Published

on

Review: Movies may be magic, but Sam Mendes’ ‘Empire of Light’ can’t conjure the illusion

In “Empire of Mild,” Sam Mendes casts a nostalgic eye towards the flicks. Like a number of different auteurs this winter season, Mendes has crafted what could possibly be thought of a “love letter to cinema” (see additionally: Steven Spielberg’s “The Fabelmans,” Damien Chazelle’s “Babylon”), however “Empire of Mild” is much less of a mash observe to moviemaking than a tribute to the movie show itself, that cathedral of collective goals borne by a single beam of sunshine.

The Empire in query is the fictional Empire Cinema in Margate, a coastal metropolis in England; the yr is 1980 and the story issues the unlikely, and complex, friendship between Hilary (Olivia Colman), the obligation supervisor on the Empire, and Stephen (Micheal Ward), the brand new ticket taker. Motion pictures are their enterprise, and the backdrop to their relationship, which blooms among the many popcorn and sweet and takes flight within the Empire’s deserted upstairs membership room, a once-glorious house now serving as a pigeon roost.

“Empire of Mild” is fantastically shot by legendary cinematographer Roger Deakins, who contrasts the blueish seaside exterior gentle with the nice and cozy, wealthy inside of the Empire outfitted in golds and reds, the workers clad in aubergine. It’s a attractive movie, directly ethereal and earthy, the proud, but crumbling glamour of the Empire putting us on this second in time.

Funnily sufficient, “Empire of Mild” shares some story DNA with one other office film that takes place at an “Empire”: “Empire Data,” that mid-‘90s romp a few group of misfit teenagers working at a report retailer. Each movies happen at a enterprise devoted to a bodily house the place followers come to worship their artwork type of alternative, and the place the staff type an oddball household, contending with their numerous private points. In “Data,” a company takeover threatens obsolescence, and although that hasn’t fairly arrived but in “Mild,” it’s clear Mendes, setting the movie 4 a long time in the past, is reckoning with the doable extinction of the movie show in his personal means.

As to the worker points, Mendes, writing alone for the primary time (he beforehand co-wrote “1917”), saddles Hilary and Stephen with some heavy-duty private obstacles that replicate the social plagues of the time. Hilary contends with an ongoing psychological well being disaster stemming from gender-based trauma (see the “girl = woe man” graffiti on the partitions of her squalid house), whereas Stephen, the son of Caribbean immigrants, has to shoulder the burden of racism constructing in Thatcher’s England, the place skinheads are emboldened to assault. At one level, he despairingly lists a spate of racist incidents to Hillary after an unsightly encounter with an aggressive patron. It feels much less like life like dialogue and extra like Mendes trying to set the context.

Advertisement

Micheal Ward within the film “Empire of Mild.”

(Searchlight Footage)

The story appears like a mashing collectively of those social ills with numerous references to influential movies of the period (“Stir Loopy,” “Chariots of Hearth,” “Raging Bull”), music (The English Beat, Joni Mitchell, Cat Stevens), and some favourite poets (W.H. Auden and Philip Larkin), whereas the cinema setting presents the chance to wax poetically in regards to the magic of projected celluloid (Toby Jones performs the clever projectionist Norman). However Mendes finally ends up making the misguided, and flat, argument that motion pictures can deal with psychological sickness, and ska music can struggle racism.

For film lovers and appreciators of the expertise of 35-millimeter movie projected in an attractive previous film home, it’s simple to grasp the place Mendes is coming from, and to agree together with his assertions. However as a film lover eager to fall in love with a narrative, “Empire of Mild” doesn’t present that have. Deakins’ work is gorgeous, Colman is unimaginable, and the position of Stephen proves to be a breakout for Ward. However the story is just too scattershot and contrived for an viewers to be swept away and moved in the identical means that Colman finds herself swept away by the expertise of the Peter Sellers traditional “Being There.”

Advertisement

We don’t want somebody to remind us that motion pictures are magic by stating that up entrance, often it’s the magic of storytelling itself that achieves that, which “Empire of Mild” in the end, and sadly, fumbles.

Katie Walsh is a Tribune Information Service movie critic.

‘Empire of Mild’

Rated: R, for sexual content material, language and transient violence

Operating time: 1 hour 59 minutes

Advertisement

Enjoying: Begins Dec. 9 on the whole launch

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

This Never Happened (2024) – Review | Tubi Horror Movie | Heaven of Horror

Published

on

This Never Happened (2024) – Review | Tubi Horror Movie | Heaven of Horror

An intriguing premise

When I’m about to watch a supernatural horror movie with a plot that revolves around a home, where a man and his friends used to hang out, then my femicide-senses are immediately tingling.

We meet Emily (María José De La Cruz) who is having terrible nightmares. She’s also medicated, so we’re made aware that there might be some mental health challenges for her. The story begins with her going from the US to Mexico City with her boyfriend, Mateo (Javier Dulzaides).

Mateo’s father recently passed away, so they’re going to his funeral, where Emily will also meet Mateo’s mother and his friends for the first time. Not the best way to meet someone, but Mateo insists it’s as good a time as any.

Before I go any further, let me just say that Mateo’s mother, Melora, was portrayed by Andrea Noli. She looked like a younger Betty Buckley and was just as sharp and funny. The most kitsch and entertaining character in This Never Happened.

Not that the rest of the cast wasn’t good. They were, for the most part. Especially María José De La Cruz as Emily was good. Andrea Noli was simply a true scene-stealer!

Advertisement

Anyway, as soon as Emily arrives at the house (which is more like a high-tech mansion), she starts seeing things. Things as in a woman, who seems to be an angry and violent spirit. Of course, this comes as absolutely no surprise, when we see how Mateo’s friends are entitled rich kids.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Civil War

Published

on

Civil War

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ 1/2 (out of 5)

Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Annihilation) may not be a name as familiar to many. Yet, in his film making career, he has managed to write and direct some of the most creative works in cinemas. His vision of a dystopian future combines brilliance with an unnerving component that has garnered characters and stories that continue to capture the imagination. His latest project taps into the potential division within the United States, leading to a civil war between the states and the federal government.

Garland embeds the audience into the centre of the action as it unfolds with a team of journalists trying to get the story affecting the country out to the world. Photojournalist Lee Smith (Kirsten Dunst) leads a small team that foresees the downfall of the current administration and strives to get to Washington, DC, before the Western forces. Yet, the journey is marked by precarious situations in every community as anarchy and confusion have taken over the country since law enforcement has been disbanded. Their press credentials allow the team to move through each community and even provide them access to local battle scenes that occur along the way. As Lee tries to protect and mentor the aspiring photographer, Jessie (Cailee Spaeny), her Reuter’s partner, Joel (Wagner Moura), attempts to navigate the backroads of America to get them to the nation’s capital before it falls.

From the opening scene, Garland’s story announces the cautionary messaging of how close the United States is to destroying itself from within its own borders. Yet, the masterful manner that this film maker has gone with this storyline is how he manages to do this without taking clear sides on the topics affecting the country. He doesn’t pit race, social class or political affiliations against one another. Instead, the writer/director shows how horrifically this war would impact everyone, even those who choose to ignore what is happening in their neighbourhood. As a neutral observer, he gives the viewer a perspective of judging each community and situation without making commentary that would steer the interpretation of each scenario as it unfolds. As these journalists travel between communities, military actions and personal challenges, the audience gets a front-row seat to the horrors of war that should lead to reconciliation within this mighty nation.

Americans will feel mixed emotions as the movie rolls forward, which will cause tensions between patriotism, justice and what it is to be an American. What is most unnerving is the plausibility of all of this unfolding and how unnerving this possible reality impacts the emotional state of a nation. Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Stephen McKinley and Cailee Spaeny make a perfect social experiment that represents the majority of the population and how each sees the downfall of America in a different way. Outside of some unlikely scenarios and equipment usage, there is little to discredit Alex Garland’s film. Every scene has a purpose; each character serves their role convincingly, and the story allows the audience to determine what they must do with what unfolds before them. Civil War proves to be a warning for countries and people that should lead to conversations of unification, forgiveness, identity, and reconciliation.

Advertisement

Reel Dialogue: Where do we find our identity?

One of the most profound moments in the film developed into one of the most ghastly as the journalists were asked, ‘What kind of American are you?’ This is a question that strikes right at the heart of personal identity. The answer to ‘Who are you?’ has plagued philosophers, theologians and university professors for centuries. The world of Civil War continues the discussion on identity by evaluating what it takes to determine who you are in this world.

Remember that this is a work of fiction. Still, these questions should force every one to determine who they are and what defines their existence. Fiction or not, it does not minimise the fact that people continue to question what it means to be a person. What might surprise many people is that there is one reference that can answer this question, the Bible.

It states that regardless of where we were born, where we live and what political affiliation we may identify with, we are made in the image of God, which means that God has a particular position for us in this world. An answer that merely begins to provide the direction to this existential query. So, why not dig in more? Interestingly, this study of humanity could bring one closer to knowing God and more about who you are.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. – Genesis 1:27

If you would like to discuss themes from Civil War reach out to us at Third Space. We would love to chat with you about this and more.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Abigail Movie Review: When pirouettes turn perilous

Published

on

Abigail Movie Review: When pirouettes turn perilous
Story: After abducting the ballerina daughter of a crime lord, a band of criminals seek refuge in a secluded mansion, oblivious to the truth behind the child they’ve trapped.

Review: Set against the eerie backdrop of a sprawling mansion, the film introduces us to a seemingly straightforward scenario: a group of disparate criminals abduct a young girl in the hopes of a big payout. However, as the story unfolds, it reveals a layered and darker narrative: the apparent victim, a young girl named Abigail, is anything but helpless. Directed by the duo Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, ‘Abigail’ reinvigorates the horror-thriller genre with a compelling twist on the classic kidnapping plot. The film would arguably be far more effective if the twist were hidden from its marketing, but ‘Abigail’ is still a compelling watch.

A lot of that is credited to the ‘little girl’ Abigail. Alisha Weir delivers a standout performance, masterfully oscillating between angelic innocence and chilling malevolence. Her balletic movements, which transition into deadly attacks, add a hauntingly beautiful dimension to her character’s ferocity. Dan Stevens excels as the mercurial ex-cop Frank, whose unpredictable nature keeps the audience on edge. Melissa Barrera’s nuanced performance as a tough yet motherly Joey adds emotional depth, portraying a conflicted figure who forms a surprising bond with Abigail. The rest of the cast also enriches the film’s dynamic by bringing their own complexities and secrets into play. The chemistry among the cast amplifies the energy, with each actor drawing on their strengths to elevate the narrative’s intensity and unpredictability.

While ‘Abigail’ excels in pushing boundaries with its graphic violence and rapid narrative shifts, these elements sometimes hamper the film’s pacing and coherence, especially in the third act. The visual style, marked by a gritty and dark aesthetic, intends to enhance the ambience but occasionally makes it difficult to appreciate the meticulous special effects and fight choreography that is central to the film. Despite these critiques, ‘Abigail’ tactfully combines character-driven storytelling without the usual trappings of a horror thriller. It meshes sharp, witty dialogue with brutal action to keep the audience engaged and guessing. This film not only pays homage to classic horror but also carves out its niche with a blend of gore and humour that turns a clichéd premise on its head.

Continue Reading

Trending