Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Aurora Market wants to recall Councilmember Brianne Nadeau

Published

on

Aurora Market wants to recall Councilmember Brianne Nadeau


Aurora Market in Northwest D.C.’s Parkview neighborhood has solely been in enterprise a bit of greater than a 12 months, but it surely has simply turn out to be a cornerstone of the realm. 

Advertisement

Proprietor Pablo Ortiz spent greater than a decade serving with the Military Particular Operations and says he by no means needed to become involved with politics, however now he is main an effort to recall Ward 1 Councilmember Brianne Nadeau.

Ortiz says he sought assist from Nadeau seven totally different occasions within the final 12 months, together with for the shop’s crime concern. He says he reached out to her workplace by way of electronic mail and phone, however by no means acquired a response till he went on social media earlier this month. 

Advertisement

“When you’ve got the privilege to be ready to symbolize a neighborhood, take that critically. Take heed to what the persons are asking for help,” Ortiz stated. 

He says he acquired an electronic mail from Nadeau after his posts on-line, however sadly, she acquired each his spouse’s identify and the identify of his retailer flawed. 

“It culminated actually in her correspondence with us,” Ortiz recalled. “There was no accountability or acknowledgment of any fault or oversight by her workplace. The truth is, she went so far as to discredit me and my integrity.” 

Advertisement

Aurora Market in Northwest DC ‘defends’ in opposition to repeat harassment

He says Nadeau later stopped into the shop throughout their lunch rush, the primary time he had met her, and that solidified his resolve to begin planning for a recall.

Advertisement

“We’re basically organizing inside these subsequent 11 months to make sure that we’re able to submit the recall request as soon as she has hit the one-year mark of her service,” Ortiz stated. 

Pablo Ortiz, proprietor of Aurora Market

He says the response from the neighborhood has been sturdy. 

Advertisement

“We have acquired actually dozens of in-person folks coming in; some are clients, some are new to Aurora Market, and it’s extremely clear that this can be a systematic drawback,” he stated.

Ortiz tells FOX 5 he is heard tales from others in Ward 1 who’ve had a tough time getting a response from Naduea.

Advertisement

In an electronic mail despatched to FOX 5, Nadeau’s spokesperson stated: “Councilmember Nadeau will proceed to ask suggestions from her constituents as she does at month-to-month workplace hours, by way of her e-newsletter and thru different strategies, and she or he welcomes anybody with considerations to succeed in out to her.”

READ MORE: Adams Morgan companies, residents share frustration over rise in vandalism, robberies

Ortiz has scheduled a gathering for Feb. 26 at Aurora Market to strategize, kind committees, and educate individuals who say they’re additionally in favor — like Parkview resident and home-owner, April Thompson.

Advertisement

“I completely help Brianne Nadeau being recalled I’ve been within the neighborhood since 2005 and a home-owner on the block since 2009, and I can say she isn’t my consultant within the sense that I do not really feel heard or seen,” Thompson stated. 

Thompson says except for the problems at Aurora Market, she believes town council member representing Ward 1 must be extra centered on crime and job creation. 

In D.C., remembers can’t be submitted till an individual has been in workplace for one 12 months. They have to be signed by a minimum of 10% of registered voters within the ward. 

Advertisement

“A lot of volunteers who need to exit and get signatures when that point comes … Really, the response has been way more than I might think about,” Ortiz stated. 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington, D.C

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox says he supports dismantling Department of Education in D.C. column

Published

on

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox says he supports dismantling Department of Education in D.C. column


Utah Gov. Spencer Cox supports President Donald Trump’s recent cuts to the Department of Education and said he backs the president’s plan to dismantle the federal department entirely.

He announced his position in an opinion piece published Monday in the Washington Examiner, a conservative news outlet based in Washington, D.C.

“If we’re serious about improving education, it’s time for a thoughtful, commonsense discussion about winding down the department altogether,” Cox wrote. “That’s why it’s encouraging to see President Donald Trump and newly confirmed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon reducing the role of the Department of Education and returning power where it belongs: to states and local communities.”

A spokesperson for Cox did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

The piece was published about two weeks after Cox and other GOP state leaders on Feb. 28 announced a series of public education investments, including a $1,400 raise for all public school teachers.

“We see you. We recognize you,” Cox said to public educators at the time.

That raise announcement came after Cox signed a bill into law on Feb. 14 that bans collective bargaining for teachers and other public workers. Utah labor unions have since launched a referendum to repeal the measure; Cox said Feb. 28 that the raises weren’t meant to squash the then-planned effort.

“This is the right thing to do,” Cox said about the pay increase. “If there is a referendum, the people in the state of Utah will get to decide if that’s a good thing or not.”

Why Cox says he supports dismantling the Education Department

In his opinion piece, Cox maintained that public education should be governed solely by the states, even if the lack of national oversight, as some have argued, may cause some states to fall behind.

Advertisement

“That’s how federalism works,” Cox wrote. “Our founders expected states to try different approaches and learn from one another. Innovation happens when states are free to lead, not when Washington imposes one-size-fits-all solutions.”

He argued that Washington, D.C., has overstepped its role and is “telling states how to educate their children.”

One of the primary roles of the Department of Education is to provide federal funding to public schools, especially through Title programs such as Title I. This program gives extra funding to schools with a high number of economically disadvantaged students.

Many Title I schools rely on that funding, because state contributions often inadequately support high-need students.

Cox in his opinion piece argued that the process to receive Title I funds has become too “burdensome” and that states must jump “through expensive, time-consuming hoops” to apply for the funding.

Advertisement

“That’s not to say the goals behind these programs aren’t worthwhile,” he wrote, “But the idea that Utah — or any state — needs Washington bureaucrats overseeing our schools is both outdated and wrong.”

Sarah Reale, a member of the Utah State Board of Education, called the governor’s remarks “ironic.”

While he and others argue that slashing the department will cut bureaucracy and time-consuming funding requirements, she said Cox has “signed dozens of bills into law that, on a state level, have added layers of bureaucracy, removed local flexibility and governance and created additional red tape for [schools] through various state monitoring requirements.”

In his piece, Cox wrote that cutting the Department of Education’s workforce in half is a “promising start” for fixing the problem that is “federal control” over public education.

“Utah has a long track record of investing in education, including supporting low-income schools,” his piece added. “But we could do it with more flexibility, less bureaucracy, and greater accountability to Utah families — not Washington regulators.”

Advertisement

Reale argued that leaving education purely up to the states means there is “no guarantee” that various student populations will be served equally.

“Our most marginalized and disadvantaged students would suffer without those federal guidelines,” Reale argued.

Utah currently maintains its second-to-last position in the nation for funding students, according to the latest rankings released last year, which were based on financial figures from 2021, the most recently available nationally. Utah at the time allocated roughly $9,095 per student, about a third of New York’s $26,571, which took the top spot.

The state’s largest teachers union, the Utah Education Association, did not immediately respond Monday to a request for comment on Cox’s column.

“Dismantling the Department of Education may sound bold,” Cox concluded in his piece. “But it’s also common sense. Washington doesn’t have all the answers. It’s time to trust states and local communities to do what they do best.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Donald Trump To Rename Washington DC To 'District Of America'? Fact Checking Viral Claims

Published

on

Donald Trump To Rename Washington DC To 'District Of America'? Fact Checking Viral Claims


A video recording of President Donald Trump allegedly suggesting renaming Washington, DC, has gone viral on social media. The clip only features the voice of the 47th President and claims to capture him in a “hot mic” moment. In it, Trump proposes changing the name of the US Capital from Washington, DC, to Washington, DA. The 78-year-old takes issues with the presence of the word Columbia in the name of the national capital and wants to change it to “America.”

“No more Washington, DC. I hate it. It makes no sense. They call it the District of Columbia. It’s got nothing to do with Columbia. It’s nowhere near Colombia. From now on, it will be Washington, DA. District of America. No more of this Columbia nonsense,” the President is heard.

The clip sparked curiosity on social media, with many questioning its authenticity. According to Grok, the video is a deepfake. A post by the AI chatbot stated that, “No evidence supports the claim that Trump wants to rename Washington, D.C., to “District of America” (DA). Research shows he’s focused on federal control of DC, not renaming it. The idea may stem from a mix-up over “Columbia,” but it’s likely misinformation. Trump has suggested renaming other places, like the Gulf of Mexico, but not DC.”

President Trump has changed the names of several places and landmarks in and around the US since taking over the Oval Office in January. He has renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America and reverted Mt. Denali in Alaska to its original name, Mt. McKinley.

Get Latest News Live on Times Now along with Breaking News and Top Headlines from US News, World and around the world.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Washington DC’s economy is headed for a recession as Trump slashes federal workforce | CNN Business

Published

on

Washington DC’s economy is headed for a recession as Trump slashes federal workforce | CNN Business



Washington
CNN
 — 

Tyler Wolf was laid off last week from his job as an employment attorney at the US Department of Health and Human Services. The 32-year-old had been saving up to buy a home and planned to move in with his girlfriend this year.

Wolf is now planning to move out of his apartment near The Wharf, a trendy waterfront business district in the city, by early April to live with his parents in Virginia. He has also cut back on his spending.

The Trump administration’s overhaul of the federal government, carried out in large part by Elon Musk’s government efficiency team, has left tens of thousands in Washington without a job. That’s threatening a key economic engine of America’s capital city — consumer spending.

Advertisement

And with signs of strain already showing, economists at Moody’s say DC could slip into a recession as soon as this year.

Wolf has already adjusted his behavior accordingly as he looks for a new position in a competitive job market.

“I’m lucky that I don’t have children or a mortgage because it gives me a bit more flexibility, but this is definitely going to set me back quite a bit,” Wolf said. “Now I’ve been cooking at home, I try not to go out for drinks, and it’s been a bit disheartening seeing most open attorney positions here asking for a lot more experience than I have.”

There are about 2.4 million federal workers in the United States, excluding those employed by the military and the Postal Service — 17% of whom live in the DC metropolitan area, according to government data. So far, the Trump administration has fired at least 103,452 workers across the federal government nationwide (though some of those cuts are being challenged in the courts).

First-time applications for unemployment benefits in Washington spiked throughout February, likely reflecting contractor job losses, according to economists. That might just be tip of the iceberg: Forecasters at Oxford Economists project 33,700 federal job losses in the DC metro in 2025. And this year’s job market likely won’t be able to absorb all of those federal workers who are expected to be out of work, said Allison Shrivastava, an economist at jobs site Indeed.

Advertisement

The job cuts Oxford Economics forecasts for the DC metro would amount to $4.9 billion in lost wages this year; federal workers’ paychecks account for 1.6% of the total wages earned in the metropolitan area, according to the group’s analysis. Contractors and others who indirectly depend on the government add more, as well.

People tend to pull back on spending when they no longer have steady income, and nonessential goods and services typically get hit first — ultimately generate a ripple effect throughout the economy.

Alexandra Reid, who lives in Washington with her husband and dog, was laid off last month from her program specialist job at the National Institutes of Health. The 30-year-old said losing her job halved her household’s income; the couple will likely need to dip into their savings just to get by.

“I have stopped pretty much all spending on nonessentials since I received the termination notice, only making food, grocery, and transportation purchases as a protective measure,” Reid said. “And this is just a terrible job market right now to be in.”

On Thursday, a second federal judge ruled that that thousands of probationary employees who were laid off by the Trump administration must get their jobs back temporarily. Reid told CNN that the ruling would apply to her and is hopeful she’ll get her job back soon.

Advertisement

The impact on businesses and housing

Miloud Benzerga, owner of Timgad Café in the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center, told CNN that he estimates foot traffic to his shop is down about 25% to 30% compared to January, before the Trump administration began to fire workers.

He said his café, which employs nine people, managed to survive the Covid-19 pandemic, but he’s not so sure that will be case this time around.

“It make me sad that a lot of people are losing their jobs, and of course, that has something to do with my business, too,” Benzerga said. “If it gets worse, we’ll have to close, and I am not the only one. I’ve talked with other business inside food court.”

Commuters cross Pennsylvania Avenue near the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 12, 2025.

“We’re hearing concerns from businesses about the overall reduction in local business activity but also about the federal cuts,” Chinyere Hubbard, president of the DC Chamber of Commerce, told CNN.

She said the chamber has started to see “a lot of interest” from businesses in its resources and events, such as an upcoming small-business expo.

Adam Kamins, director of regional economics at Moody’s, said that the impact of President Donald Trump’s layoffs will be immediately felt by consumer-facing industries, such as retail and hospitality, and that the economic pain is expected to be more widespread later in the year.

Advertisement

“The recession in DC will be noticeable during the second half of this year, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it actually started in March because we’ve already seen little indications of weakness,” Kamins said, adding that “there’s always a lag between when things are happening in the economy and when the data reflect those events.”

The metro’s housing market also suggests more people might be leaving the metro area amid Trump’s layoffs: Homes listed for sale began to pick up in late January, according to Realtor.com data, and were 56.2% higher in the week of March 8 compared to the same week a year earlier. That reflects a sharp acceleration from the second half of last year, when inventory growth hovered between 20% and 30%.

“So far, we’re seeing more homes on the market, and modestly lower asking prices, but the situation continues to evolve,” Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, said in a statement. “While I expect many households will choose to stay in the area and pivot to find new job opportunities, some will likely choose to leave and retire or find a job elsewhere.”

“I’m more upset than anything because of the arbitrary nature of all this, but I do feel confident that I’ll get back on my feet — with time,” said Wolf.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending