Sports
2025 NCAA Tournament bracket picks: Why CJ Moore has Florida topping Duke for national title
The men’s basketball selection committee had an easy job at the top of the bracket this year. The 2025 NCAA Tournament might have the best collection of No. 1 seeds in March Madness history.
By the numbers, it is the best, at least in college basketball’s advanced analytics era, which dates to 1997, when Ken Pomeroy’s eponymous website began tracking college basketball data. This year’s four No. 1 seeds — Auburn, Duke, Houston and Florida — are all above 35 in adjusted efficiency margin. (Efficiency margin is determined by points scored and allowed per 100 possessions and adjusted for schedule.) In no other year have even two teams finished above 35. The No. 1 seeds’ net ratings add up to 144.81; last year’s No. 1 seeds’ pre-tourney net ratings totaled 117.7, and remember that field had two truly dominant teams at the top in UConn and Purdue.
Two reasons for that dominance: a funneling of the best mid-major players to high-major programs via the transfer portal, and an all-time season of offensive efficiency across the country, with the teams at the top scoring at historic rates.
That’s why it’s smart to mostly steer clear of riding mid-majors too far. We will look back at last year’s tournament as an inflection point in college basketball history: No true mid-major advanced past the second round. San Diego State (Mountain West) and Gonzaga (WCC) did, but their resources are closer to high-major programs than the schools with which they share a conference. We are only two years removed from both Florida Atlantic and San Diego State reaching the Final Four, but look at what has happened to their rosters since:
• FAU’s entire rotation with eligibility remaining is elsewhere, with Alijah Martin (Florida) and Vlad Goldin (Michigan) playing key roles on two highly seeded teams.
• Stars on that San Diego State team still left in college include Lamont Butler (now at Kentucky) and Micah Parrish (Ohio State).
Studying tourney history is always a good guide to filling out your bracket, and although this is a new era, this rule should hold true: In the years with truly elite teams near the top — using analytics as the measuring stick — a No. 1 seed usually wins the title. A No. 1 seed has also won six of the last seven tournaments.
I’m almost embarrassed at how chalk I went with my picks, but I’ve been writing all year about how the top tier of college basketball was historically good, and it’s hard not to let that knowledge influence my picks. My prediction is we’ll end up with one of the chalkiest NCAA Tournaments ever. That might not make for as fun of a first weekend, but the matchups in the second weekend and at the Final Four could be epic.
South Region
• Michigan-UC San Diego might be one of the most interesting matchups of the Round of 64. Michigan’s dread all season has been turnovers, and the Tritons rank second in Division I in defensive turnover rate. The only issue for UC San Diego is its small frontcourt. Michigan is huge up front with 7-footers Danny Wolf and Vladislav Goldin. The Tritons will double the post, but Michigan is used to dealing with that, and Wolf is dangerous diving to the basket. Dusty May also has solid options for dealing with UC San Diego star Aniwaniwa Tait-Jones between Wolf and Rubin Jones. Before the bracket was released, I was pretty sure I would go with the Tritons, but the Wolverines might just have too much up front. Expect this betting line to be a small one — Michigan is ranked 25th at KenPom, UC San Diego 36th — so if you’re looking for an upset pick that makes sense in this region, this is a good spot.
• Louisville, which lost only two games in conference play, is a bit of a surprise here on the No. 8 line, but that’s how bad the ACC was this year. The Cards could struggle with Bluejays big man Ryan Kalkbrenner, but Creighton needs efficient production from Steven Ashworth, and Louisville’s Chucky Hepburn is a stopper. Whoever wins that matchup will win the game. Hepburn could also be a tough matchup for Auburn in the second round; guards who excel in pick-and-roll situations have given the Tigers some trouble. If you want to fade the No. 1 seed, which has struggled defensively lately (ranking 47th in the last three weeks, per Bart Torvik), then this is the first spot to consider the upset. I’m just not sure the Cards have the bodies up front to deal with national player of the year candidate Johni Broome.
• Yale could be a trendy upset pick after knocking off Auburn a year ago, but remember Danny Wolf was on that team and is now at Michigan. The Aggies will likely face Wolf in the second round, and although Texas A&M’s ability to apply pressure and force turnovers is worrisome, Michigan has the bodies to hang on the glass. You have to rebound to beat the Aggies, and the Wolverines will get it done.
• Iowa State was a team considered Final Four-level good in the opening months of the season, but this isn’t the same team. Keshon Gilbert, who was expected to be the Cyclones’ best player this year, is done for the season, coach T.J. Otzelberger announced Sunday. The Cyclones have good depth, but they were laboring down the stretch, losing four of their last seven. Ole Miss coach Chris Beard is familiar with the Cyclones from his time in the Big 12, and his Rebels should be able to handle some physicality after playing in the SEC. A mini-upset here, with the Rebels moving on to the Sweet 16.
• New Mexico is another upset pick I considered, but the way to beat the Lobos is with talented guards who can score off the bounce. Marquette’s Kam Jones might be better at that than anyone in America.
• Michigan State has the easiest path to the Sweet 16 of any No. 2 seed. To beat Auburn, you need guards who can get to the rim and evade Broome, who wants to turn his hips and meet you at the basket to block your shot. That’s a dangerous strategy against speedy guards like Jase Richardson and Jeremy Fears. I’m tempted to pick the Spartans or Wolverines to knock off Auburn because the Tigers have lost some of their magic these last few weeks, but a little humility might just be what Auburn needed to refocus.
West Region
• Last year the West got wacky, and it could happen again this year. Florida, Maryland and St. John’s were all teams I considered putting in the Final Four before the bracket was released, but I decided over the last few weeks to pick Florida as my champ, and I’m sticking with that pick. The Gators, much like UConn in 2024, have the hardest path, but I’m a believer in picking what you believe is the best team. That said, the thought of seeing UConn in the second round is scary, as is meeting Maryland’s Crab Five in the Sweet 16, and you could argue St. John’s/Texas Tech is the best No. 2/No. 3 seed combo in any region.
• Memphis won the AAC championship without third-leading scorer Tyrese Hunter. His unclear status makes me hesitant to pick the Tigers to go too far. The predictive metrics do not love Memphis this year (No. 51 at KenPom), and Hunter has the best plus-minus numbers on the team, per CBB Analytics. Mountain West champ Colorado State, winner of 10 in a row, is one of the hottest teams in the country and has one of the best wings in the country in Nique Clifford. His matchup with PJ Haggerty will be a fun one. The Rams could end up betting favorites, and the reason I like them is Rashaan Mbemba has the strength to match up with Memphis big man Dain Dainja.
• Drake will be a trendy upset pick, and for good reason. The Bulldogs are 3-0 against high-major teams this year, Ben McCollum is one of the best coaches in college basketball, and he has Bennett Stirtz, whom a rival Missouri Valley coach recently told me is the best guard in the country. The Tigers rely on turnovers and prefer to play fast; McCollum’s teams always control the tempo. He also hasn’t lost in the first round of an NCAA Tournament since 2018. Granted, that’s the Division II tournament, but it’s actually harder to get out of the first round in D-II because its bracket is split into eight regions by geography, meaning the bottom (No. 8) seed could be a top-20 team if you happen to be in a stacked region.
• Texas Tech could be upset-prone depending on health. Starting guard Chance McMillian and starting forward Darrion Williams sat out the Big 12 semis. I’d expect Williams to be back for the tournament, but not so sure on McMillian. I’d be tempted to put Drake in the Sweet 16, but here’s one reason to believe in Texas Tech: Coach Grant McCasland is one of McCollum’s best friends and is not going to overlook Drake. In fact, these teams played a secret scrimmage in the preseason — won by Texas Tech — so the Red Raiders already know how good Drake is. Also, JT Toppin is a difficult matchup for a smaller front line.
• Arkansas-Kansas is another matchup that took place in the preseason. The Razorbacks won that one comfortably, but it was in Fayetteville and the Jayhawks were without veteran big man Hunter Dickinson. Though this is not the typical Kansas team, it was playing better down the stretch, and Arkansas could be out of sync trying to work Boogie Fland back into the lineup from a hand injury that sidelined him for two months.
• Kansas-St. John’s is another game with a perfect storyline. Two years ago, Bill Self recruited Dickinson out of the portal, and his addition pushed out Zuby Ejiofor, who has emerged as a star for the Johnnies. Expect this game to go much like Kansas’ recent loss at Houston. Kansas turned the ball over too often against the Cougars, and it will do it again in a low-scoring game that St. John’s will win.
• The Sweet 16 in this region should be awesome. Maryland will play with Florida for about 30 minutes but eventually wear down against the deepest front line in college basketball. St. John’s is one of the few opponents that can give Texas Tech a hard time finding advantageous matchups for JT Toppin and Darrion Williams. If the Red Raiders get hot from 3, they could pull off the upset. They were the only team to beat Houston in Big 12 play, but their health is a concern.
• This sets up a regional final that will be must-watch television, with Florida star Walter Clayton facing his old coach Rick Pitino — Clayton started his career at Iona — and one of the sport’s all-time best coaches squaring off against one of its best young ones, Todd Golden. The Gators should be prepared from the three games they played against another blue-collar team with a dominant defense in Tennessee. (Florida won two of three.) St. John’s might be the defense best equipped to slow the Gators, but Florida’s 3-point shooting will be the difference.
East Region
• Oregon-Liberty is one of the few spots where I went with an upset. Like Drake, Liberty can control the pace and is one of the best 3-point shooting teams in the country. Oregon prefers to play with pace. It’s not usually a good strategy to bet against Ducks coach Dana Altman in March, but Ritchie McKay is one of the mid-major level’s best coaches, and this is the best team he’s taken to the tournament since 2019 when Liberty upset Mississippi State in the first round.
• VCU is a concerning matchup for BYU. It’s going to take a great defensive team to knock off the Cougars, and that’s what VCU is. But BYU was on a roll recently until it lost by 20 to Houston in the Big 12 semis, and I’m just going to chalk that up to the fact playing Houston is unlike playing anyone else in college basketball. Under first-year coach Kevin Young, BYU has one of the best offenses in the country and has been playing with a ton of confidence.
• Wisconsin-BYU could be one of the most entertaining games of the tournament. Both teams shoot a lot of 3s, play with beautiful ball movement and are solid but not elite on the defensive end. The Badgers are the slightly better team and worry about BYU’s ability to slow down John Tonje, but I have to pick some kind of upset, and BYU has been playing more like a top-three seed as of late. This is close to a coin flip.
• Saint Mary’s could give Alabama issues if it can control the pace, but the Gaels would need to hit double-digit 3s to keep up. They haven’t done that since Jan. 11.
• If you want to pick Duke to get upset, the Sweet 16 might be a decent spot. Duke beat Arizona by 14 in Tucson earlier this season, but the Wildcats have improved as much as anyone since November, mostly because of the emergence of Henri Veesaar. The Wildcats’ bigs are athletic enough to at least match up with Cooper Flagg, but it would take Caleb Love’s going nuclear to pull off the upset. I’m tempted but ultimately too much of a believer in this Duke team.
• Speaking of Duke, some might fade the Blue Devils because of the weak ACC they dominated. Let me remind you that Gonzaga has made the national championship game twice coming out of the West Coast Conference. If anything, the easier schedule helped Jon Scheyer find another asset. I’m not sure he would have experimented with playing freshman sharpshooter Isaiah Evans if Duke was playing in a league like the SEC.
• Duke-Alabama could be another great Elite Eight game. My worry for the Crimson Tide is Grant Nelson’s health. Nelson injured his knee against Florida in the SEC tournament semifinals, and Alabama will need him at 100 percent to knock off Duke. The Crimson Tide are another team with the size and athleticism up front to deal with the Blue Devils, but Duke wing Kon Knueppel could be a matchup problem. The size and strength of Sion James could also give Crimson Tide leading scorer Mark Sears some issues. I wouldn’t blame anyone for picking Alabama to get back to the Final Four, but Duke and Florida were the two teams I knew pre-bracket I was taking at least to the Final Four, and I’m not budging off that strategy.
Midwest Region
• Houston cannot love the idea of seeing Gonzaga, No. 9 at KenPom, in the second round. The Zags have made nine consecutive Sweet 16s and always seem to be peaking in March. But the Zags lost to Saint Mary’s twice in low-possession games, and Houston has taken its elite defense to another level.
• My buddy Seth Davis took High Point and McNeese in the Round of 64 in this region, and I was tempted to do the same. Will Wade’s Cowboys played Alabama and Mississippi State close in the nonconference, and the talent gap isn’t going to be that big against Clemson. I am going with High Point for a few reasons. High Point has one of the best offenses at the mid-major level. The Panthers, coached by former Creighton assistant Alan Huss, make 57.4 percent of their 2s, and Purdue has struggled defensively inside the arc this year without Zach Edey, ranking 350th out of 364 D-I teams in 2-point percentage defense. The health of Fletcher Loyer, who injured his elbow in the Boilermakers’ Big Ten tournament loss to Michigan, is also a concern. High Point gets by Purdue, but I’m sticking with my rule of no mid-majors past the second round.
• Illinois has been a wild ride this year. Every time I start to believe in the Illini, they give me good reason to jump off the bandwagon. But they have been much better with a healthy Tomislav Ivisic, and he was starting to play better until the loss to Maryland in the Big Ten quarterfinal. Kentucky, meanwhile, is limping into the tournament and has been injury-riddled all season. If Lamont Butler were back to his usual self, I’d maybe lean Kentucky, but it doesn’t seem like his shoulder is ever going to be the same.
• Tennessee was the one No. 2 seed I was convinced I wouldn’t pick to make the Elite Eight about a week ago, but then I watched the SEC tournament. The Vols’ offense seems to have new life with Jordan Gainey catching fire. UCLA is good enough to pull off the second-round upset. We already watched the Illini almost beat Tennessee in mid-December, when Gainey helped the Vols escape Champaign with a buzzer-beater. I wouldn’t blame someone for falling for the Illini, but I’m betting on experience.
• Houston-Tennessee is a Spider-Man meme Elite Eight matchup: old rosters, legendary coaches, great defenses and offenses that rely on shot-making guards. I just trust Houston’s guards to consistently make shots at a higher clip. This is Kelvin Sampson’s best offensive team at Houston, and Milos Uzan, who starred in the Big 12 title game, will be the difference in this one as well. But if you want to deviate from my silly chalky ways, this might be a good spot. Sampson told me Saturday he thinks the four best SEC teams might be the four best teams in the country, so maybe we should listen to him. But I’m betting on the Cougars, who will enter this tournament (mostly) healthy for the first time since 2021, a year when they made the Final Four.
(Photo of Alijah Martin: James Gilbert / Getty Images)
Sports
2026 World Cup Odds: Spain Narrowly Favored Over France
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
We’re approaching the biggest sporting event North America has ever hosted.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup takes place across the USA, Canada and Mexico in 13 days.
Bettors and fans already have their sights set on the global spectacle, which will kick off on June 11. The World Cup final will be held at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium on July 19, 2026.
After the World Cup groups were announced in December, Spain opened as the favorite at +450, followed by England (+550) and France (+750).
Now, with less than two weeks to go, Spain has slightly drifted to +475, with both France and England making up ground on the oddsboard.
Let’s dive into the odds via DraftKings Sportsbook as of May 29.
This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.
2026 World Cup winner odds
Spain: +475 (bet $10 to win $57.5 total)
France: +500 (bet $10 to win $60 total)
England: +650 (bet $10 to win $75 total)
Brazil: +850 (bet $10 to win $95 total)
Argentina: +900 (bet $10 to win $100 total)
Portugal: +1000 (bet $10 to win $110 total)
Germany: +1400 (bet $10 to win $150 total)
Netherlands: +2200 (bet $10 to win $230 total)
Norway: +3500 (bet $10 to win $360 total)
Belgium: +3500 (bet $10 to win $360 total)
Colombia: +4000 (bet $10 to win $410 total)
Morocco: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)
Uruguay: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)
United States: +6000 (bet $10 to win $610 total)
Switzerland: +6500 (bet $10 to win $660 total)
Japan: +6500 (bet $10 to win $660 total)
Mexico: +8000 (bet $10 to win $810 total)
Croatia: +8000 (bet $10 to win $810 total)
Ecuador: +8000 (bet $10 to win $810 total)
Senegal: +9000 (bet $10 to win $910 total)
Sweden: +10000 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)
HOST NATIONS
United States
The United States is led by Christian Pulisic, Weston McKennie, Tyler Adams, and Chris Richards, with several players competing in Europe’s top leagues. The U.S. has appeared in 11 previous World Cups, with its best finish coming in 1930 when the team reached the semifinals.
Canada
Canada’s key players include Alphonso Davies and Jonathan David, giving the squad top-tier pace and goal-scoring ability. Canada has made two previous World Cup appearances, and is still looking for its first win ever in the tournament.
Mexico
Mexico’s top contributors include Raul Giménez and Edson Álvarez, forming a strong mix of attacking talent and midfield stability. Mexico has played in 17 previous World Cups and reached the quarterfinals twice, in 1970 and 1986.
UEFA TEAMS TO KNOW
Spain
Spain’s top talents include Pedri, Lamine Yamal and Rodri, forming a core that blends elite playmaking with scoring depth. Spain has appeared in 16 previous World Cups and won the tournament once, lifting the trophy in 2010. The team also won the 2024 Euros.
France
France enters with Kylian Mbappé as the star player, with the 26-year-old just five goals shy of passing Miroslav Klose (16) for the most career goals at the World Cup. France has made 16 previous World Cup appearances and won the title twice, in 1998 and 2018.
England
England’s key players include Harry Kane, Jude Bellingham and Declan Rice, forming one of the nation’s strongest generations in decades. England has reached 16 previous World Cups and won the trophy once, in 1966.
Germany
Germany features Florian Wirtz, Jamal Musiala and Joshua Kimmich as central figures in a talented squad. Germany has participated in 20 previous World Cups and won four titles, most recently in 2014.
Portugal
Portugal’s top group includes Bruno Fernandes, Vitinha, with Cristiano Ronaldo still involved as the team’s all-time leading scorer and cap leader. Portugal has competed in eight previous World Cups and recorded its best finish in 2006, reaching the semifinals.
Netherlands
The Netherlands features top players such as Virgil van Dijk, Ryan Gravenberch and Denzel Dumfries, forming a core built around elite defending and midfield control. Memphis Depay should also be on the team, the country’s all-time leading goalscorer. The Netherlands has appeared in 11 previous World Cups and finished as runner-up three times, in 1974, 1978 and 2010.
CONMEBOL TEAMS TO KNOW
Argentina
Argentina is anchored by Lionel Messi, with Julián Álvarez, Enzo Fernández and Lautaro Martínez— headlining one of the most talented rosters in the tournament. Argentina has played in 18 previous World Cups and won three, including the most recent tournament in 2022.
Brazil
Brazil’s roster is led by Vinícius Júnior, Raphinha and Marquinhos, giving the team elite attacking and defensive quality. Brazil has appeared in every World Cup and holds a record five titles, with its most recent one coming in 2002.
Uruguay
Uruguay’s leading players include Federico Valverde, Darwin Núñez and Ronald Araújo, forming a core with elite midfield range and speed. Uruguay has appeared in 14 previous World Cups and won the tournament twice, in 1930 and 1950.
Colombia
Colombia is headlined by Luis Díaz and James Rodríguez, with the former playing for Bayern Munich and the latter having a decorated World Cup résumé. Colombia has made six previous World Cupsand recorded its best finish in 2014, reaching the quarterfinals.
CAF TEAMS TO KNOW
Morocco
Morocco’s key contributors include Achraf Hakimi, Noussair Mazaroui and Brahm Díaz, each with major European club experience. Morocco has appeared in six previous World Cups and achieved its historic best finish in 2022, reaching the semifinals.
Senegal
Senegal’s top players include Sadio Mané, Kalidou Koulibaly and Idrissa Gueye, forming one of Africa’s most experienced cores. Senegal has appeared in three World Cups and reached its best finish in 2002, advancing to the quarterfinals.
Ghana
Ghana is led by Mohammed Kudus, Antoine Semenyo and Inaki Williams, giving the squad strong playmaking and midfield presence. Ghana has competed in four previous World Cups and reached its best result in 2010, making the quarterfinals.
AFC TEAMS TO KNOW
South Korea
South Korea is headlined by Son Heung-min, supported by key players such as Kim Min-jae and Lee Kang-in. South Korea has played in 11 previous World Cups and reached its best finish in 2002, advancing to the semifinals as co-host.
Japan
Japan features Takefusa Kubo and Kaoru Mitoma as its leading players, blending top European experience with emerging talent. Japan has appeared in seven previous World Cups and reached the Round of 16 four times, its best result to date.
Australia
Australia’s top players include Jackson Irvine and keeper Mathew Ryan as its most experienced members. Australia has competed in six previous World Cups and reached the round of 16 twice, in 2006 and 2022.
OFC TEAMS TO KNOW
New Zealand
New Zealand is led by all-time leading scorer Chris Wood, with 45 international goals to his name. New Zealand has appeared in two previous World Cups (1982, 2010), and did not advance from the group stage in either appearance.
Sports
A new board game mocks Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for ‘foul baiting.’ He wants it destroyed
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander apparently isn’t amused by a new board game that pokes fun at the Oklahoma City Thunder star’s reputation for garnering foul calls at the hint of contact by an opposing player.
Last week, a lawyer representing the two-time reigning NBA MVP sent a cease-and-desist letter to sports prediction market and fantasy sports company Underdog that includes a demand for the destruction of all copies of the cheeky and extremely limited-edition game Unethical Hoops.
Done in the style of the children’s classic Operation, Unethical Hoops requires players to use tweezers to pull objects from tiny holes, with the slightest touch of a metal border setting off a buzzer indicating failure.
Instead of pretending to be doctors attempting to remove body parts from a patient, however, Unethical Hoops players act as members of an opposing basketball team trying to take the ball from a cartoon character who very much resembles Gilgeous-Alexander.
In this game, the buzzer represents the whistle of a foul-calling referee.
“Shai has made hoops all about foul baiting and now you’re stuck guarding him in Underdog’s new board game,” a description reads on the game’s website. “Don’t get baited. Steal the ball without getting whistled.”
In a letter dated May 22, attorney Eric Fishman of ArentFox Schiff LLP demanded that Underdog “immediately and permanently cease and desist from any and all use of Mr. Gilgeous-Alexander’s NIL in any and all media, including but not limited to your website (including the Unethical Hoops Website)… and any physical goods including but not limited to the board game advertised on the Unethical Hoops Website.”
The notice also calls for Underdog to “immediately destroy all physical goods or advertisements that use Mr. Gilgeous-Alexander’s NIL, including but not limited to the board game advertised on the Unethical Hoops Website,” as well as a promise never to use the star player’s name, image or likeness without his permission.
Fishman did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Times.
According to the Unethical Hoops website, which remains active more than a week after the date on the cease-and-desist order, only 100 copies of the game were made, to be given away to Underdog users. The giveaway ended as scheduled on Friday.
Underdog declined to comment on the matter other than to point out that the company has pulled comical stunts at the expense of members of the sports world.
“We’ve poked fun at Knicks and Lakers fans, the Red Sox owners, the Mets and more,” a spokesperson said via email. “We like to have some fun with whatever is in the sports fan zeitgeist.”
Gilgeous-Alexander is a four-time All-Star who led the league in scoring last season (2,484 points) and was second in scoring this season (2,117). He led the Thunder to their first NBA title last year and has them back in the Western Conference finals this year (the decisive Game 7 against the San Antonio Spurs is Saturday in Oklahoma City).
While one of the NBA’s biggest stars, Gilgeous-Alexander is often criticized for the number of favorable foul calls he receives — he has ranked second or third in the league for number of free throw attempts per game in each of the last four seasons and is currently second among all players in the 2026 playoffs with 9.8 a game — and the lengths he appears to go to in order to receive them.
After Game 2 against the Spurs, one NBA fan account on X wrote, “Shai flopped on every single shot attempt” and posted a video that showed seven such examples (Gilgeous-Alexander actually attempted 24 shots that night). The post has been viewed 22.7 million times.
Earlier this week, prior to Game 6 of the conference finals, another fan account on X posted a video “ranking all 44 times SGA fell on the floor while shooting during the 2026 playoffs from least to most egregious.” That post has been viewed 1.3 million times.
As the cartoon likeness of Gilgeous-Alexander states in the Unethical Hoops ad, “so much as breathe on me, I’m getting the call.”
The real-life SGA was asked during a TV interview after Game 3 in San Antonio about the “flopper!” chants that rained down on him at Frost Bank Center.
“It’s part of the game,” he said. “It’s nothing. I’ve been dealing with it for a long time. I don’t really hear it. I’m focused on what’s going on on the court.”
Sports
Spurs blow out Thunder, force Game 7 as Victor Wembanyama leads the way with 28-point double-double
Trump says he thinks he’ll attend NBA Finals game
President Donald Trump said during a Cabinet meeting on Wednesday that he believes he will attend an NBA Finals game next week, as the New York Knicks make their first Finals appearance in nearly 30 years.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Western Conference Finals will come down to a Game 7 after the San Antonio Spurs routed the Oklahoma City Thunder, 118-91, in Game 6 on Thursday night.
Game 7 heads back to Oklahoma City, where the winner will face the New York Knicks in the NBA Finals after New York swept the Cleveland Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference Finals.
With their backs against the wall, the Spurs did what was necessary on their home court and then some. And it was their phenom, Victor Wembanyama, leading the way.
Victor Wembanyama of the San Antonio Spurs reacts during the first half against the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game Six of the NBA Western Conference Finals at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, on May 28, 2026. (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)
The 7-foot-4 big man led the Spurs with 28 points on 10-of-21 shooting, including four three-pointers made, while notching a double-double with 10 rebounds, two assists, two steals and three blocks.
This was the performance head coach Mitch Johnson and the rest of the team needed from Wembanyama, and he was up for the challenge as the Thunder were looking to make it back-to-back NBA Finals appearances.
Instead, the Thunder’s three-point shooting woes returned in San Antonio, much like they did in Game 4 of this series. They took a whopping 40 threes, but only cashed in 10 of them, finishing 25% from beyond the arc on the night.
SPURS SNAP THUNDER’S PLAYOFF WIN STREAK BEHIND VICTORY WEMBANYAMA’S INCREDIBLE GAME 1 PERFORMANCE
As a team, the Thunder shot just 37%, and MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is among the culprits for the poor shooting night. He had just 15 points, going 6-of-18 from the field and 0-of-5 from three-point land. Lu Dort was also ice cold from three, going just 1-of-9 and 2-of-11 for the game.
Meanwhile, San Antonio was getting more than just “Wemby” contributions, especially from rookie Dylan Harper, who played a vital role in the blowout off the bench.
Dylan Harper of the San Antonio Spurs looks on during the first quarter against the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 6 of the NBA Western Conference Finals at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, on May 28, 2026. (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)
Harper was quite efficient when he had the ball in his hands, going 6-of-9 from the field for 18 points, while tallying six rebounds and four assists in his pivotal 22 minutes off the pine.
And in the starting five, Stephon Castle was getting to the rim like he’s supposed to, scoring 17 points while dishing out nine assists for the Spurs. Devin Vassell also hit four of his seven three-point shots for 12 points, while Julian Champagnie poured in 10 more with six rebounds, two assists, one steal and two blocks on the other end of the hardwood.
The Spurs saw 12 different players contribute on the scoreboard in this contest, some of whom made their way into the game when the Thunder conceded and already started to focus on Game 7. And that swing came in the third quarter, when the Spurs outscored the Thunder, 32-13, and started to run away with this must-win game for their franchise.
San Antonio Spurs forward Victor Wembanyama shoots against the Oklahoma City Thunder in the first half of Game 6 in the Western Conference finals NBA playoffs in San Antonio on May 28, 2026. (David J. Phillip/AP)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Now, folks, it all comes down to the ever-suspenseful Game 7, where the Thunder will hope one last home game will give them the juice to push their way into the Finals.
But the Spurs are hoping to recreate 1999 by earning a matchup with the Knicks in the NBA Finals.
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
-
Wisconsin5 minutes ago
Wisconsin National Guard troops return after yearlong deployment in Middle East
-
West Virginia11 minutes agoWheeling launches West Virginia’s first recovery housing program for young adults
-
Wyoming17 minutes ago
Critics oppose Wyoming hydroelectric project, pointing to climate-driven drought crisis
-
Crypto23 minutes agoStablecoin Settlement Is Here, but Seamless Off-Chain Money Movement Is Not | PYMNTS.com
-
Finance28 minutes agoEvoke Entertainment Closes $35 Million Production Financing Facility Backed By Major Private Credit Fund
-
Fitness35 minutes agoHow busy women can realistically hit 10 hours of exercise a week – and unlock the biggest health benefits
-
Movie Reviews47 minutes agoThe Breadwinner (Christian Movie Review) – The Collision
-
World59 minutes agoWar breaking news. Trump postpones decision: nothing after two hours in Situation Room