Sports
2025 NCAA Tournament bracket picks: Why CJ Moore has Florida topping Duke for national title
The men’s basketball selection committee had an easy job at the top of the bracket this year. The 2025 NCAA Tournament might have the best collection of No. 1 seeds in March Madness history.
By the numbers, it is the best, at least in college basketball’s advanced analytics era, which dates to 1997, when Ken Pomeroy’s eponymous website began tracking college basketball data. This year’s four No. 1 seeds — Auburn, Duke, Houston and Florida — are all above 35 in adjusted efficiency margin. (Efficiency margin is determined by points scored and allowed per 100 possessions and adjusted for schedule.) In no other year have even two teams finished above 35. The No. 1 seeds’ net ratings add up to 144.81; last year’s No. 1 seeds’ pre-tourney net ratings totaled 117.7, and remember that field had two truly dominant teams at the top in UConn and Purdue.
Two reasons for that dominance: a funneling of the best mid-major players to high-major programs via the transfer portal, and an all-time season of offensive efficiency across the country, with the teams at the top scoring at historic rates.
That’s why it’s smart to mostly steer clear of riding mid-majors too far. We will look back at last year’s tournament as an inflection point in college basketball history: No true mid-major advanced past the second round. San Diego State (Mountain West) and Gonzaga (WCC) did, but their resources are closer to high-major programs than the schools with which they share a conference. We are only two years removed from both Florida Atlantic and San Diego State reaching the Final Four, but look at what has happened to their rosters since:
• FAU’s entire rotation with eligibility remaining is elsewhere, with Alijah Martin (Florida) and Vlad Goldin (Michigan) playing key roles on two highly seeded teams.
• Stars on that San Diego State team still left in college include Lamont Butler (now at Kentucky) and Micah Parrish (Ohio State).
Studying tourney history is always a good guide to filling out your bracket, and although this is a new era, this rule should hold true: In the years with truly elite teams near the top — using analytics as the measuring stick — a No. 1 seed usually wins the title. A No. 1 seed has also won six of the last seven tournaments.
I’m almost embarrassed at how chalk I went with my picks, but I’ve been writing all year about how the top tier of college basketball was historically good, and it’s hard not to let that knowledge influence my picks. My prediction is we’ll end up with one of the chalkiest NCAA Tournaments ever. That might not make for as fun of a first weekend, but the matchups in the second weekend and at the Final Four could be epic.
South Region
• Michigan-UC San Diego might be one of the most interesting matchups of the Round of 64. Michigan’s dread all season has been turnovers, and the Tritons rank second in Division I in defensive turnover rate. The only issue for UC San Diego is its small frontcourt. Michigan is huge up front with 7-footers Danny Wolf and Vladislav Goldin. The Tritons will double the post, but Michigan is used to dealing with that, and Wolf is dangerous diving to the basket. Dusty May also has solid options for dealing with UC San Diego star Aniwaniwa Tait-Jones between Wolf and Rubin Jones. Before the bracket was released, I was pretty sure I would go with the Tritons, but the Wolverines might just have too much up front. Expect this betting line to be a small one — Michigan is ranked 25th at KenPom, UC San Diego 36th — so if you’re looking for an upset pick that makes sense in this region, this is a good spot.
• Louisville, which lost only two games in conference play, is a bit of a surprise here on the No. 8 line, but that’s how bad the ACC was this year. The Cards could struggle with Bluejays big man Ryan Kalkbrenner, but Creighton needs efficient production from Steven Ashworth, and Louisville’s Chucky Hepburn is a stopper. Whoever wins that matchup will win the game. Hepburn could also be a tough matchup for Auburn in the second round; guards who excel in pick-and-roll situations have given the Tigers some trouble. If you want to fade the No. 1 seed, which has struggled defensively lately (ranking 47th in the last three weeks, per Bart Torvik), then this is the first spot to consider the upset. I’m just not sure the Cards have the bodies up front to deal with national player of the year candidate Johni Broome.
• Yale could be a trendy upset pick after knocking off Auburn a year ago, but remember Danny Wolf was on that team and is now at Michigan. The Aggies will likely face Wolf in the second round, and although Texas A&M’s ability to apply pressure and force turnovers is worrisome, Michigan has the bodies to hang on the glass. You have to rebound to beat the Aggies, and the Wolverines will get it done.
• Iowa State was a team considered Final Four-level good in the opening months of the season, but this isn’t the same team. Keshon Gilbert, who was expected to be the Cyclones’ best player this year, is done for the season, coach T.J. Otzelberger announced Sunday. The Cyclones have good depth, but they were laboring down the stretch, losing four of their last seven. Ole Miss coach Chris Beard is familiar with the Cyclones from his time in the Big 12, and his Rebels should be able to handle some physicality after playing in the SEC. A mini-upset here, with the Rebels moving on to the Sweet 16.
• New Mexico is another upset pick I considered, but the way to beat the Lobos is with talented guards who can score off the bounce. Marquette’s Kam Jones might be better at that than anyone in America.
• Michigan State has the easiest path to the Sweet 16 of any No. 2 seed. To beat Auburn, you need guards who can get to the rim and evade Broome, who wants to turn his hips and meet you at the basket to block your shot. That’s a dangerous strategy against speedy guards like Jase Richardson and Jeremy Fears. I’m tempted to pick the Spartans or Wolverines to knock off Auburn because the Tigers have lost some of their magic these last few weeks, but a little humility might just be what Auburn needed to refocus.
West Region
• Last year the West got wacky, and it could happen again this year. Florida, Maryland and St. John’s were all teams I considered putting in the Final Four before the bracket was released, but I decided over the last few weeks to pick Florida as my champ, and I’m sticking with that pick. The Gators, much like UConn in 2024, have the hardest path, but I’m a believer in picking what you believe is the best team. That said, the thought of seeing UConn in the second round is scary, as is meeting Maryland’s Crab Five in the Sweet 16, and you could argue St. John’s/Texas Tech is the best No. 2/No. 3 seed combo in any region.
• Memphis won the AAC championship without third-leading scorer Tyrese Hunter. His unclear status makes me hesitant to pick the Tigers to go too far. The predictive metrics do not love Memphis this year (No. 51 at KenPom), and Hunter has the best plus-minus numbers on the team, per CBB Analytics. Mountain West champ Colorado State, winner of 10 in a row, is one of the hottest teams in the country and has one of the best wings in the country in Nique Clifford. His matchup with PJ Haggerty will be a fun one. The Rams could end up betting favorites, and the reason I like them is Rashaan Mbemba has the strength to match up with Memphis big man Dain Dainja.
• Drake will be a trendy upset pick, and for good reason. The Bulldogs are 3-0 against high-major teams this year, Ben McCollum is one of the best coaches in college basketball, and he has Bennett Stirtz, whom a rival Missouri Valley coach recently told me is the best guard in the country. The Tigers rely on turnovers and prefer to play fast; McCollum’s teams always control the tempo. He also hasn’t lost in the first round of an NCAA Tournament since 2018. Granted, that’s the Division II tournament, but it’s actually harder to get out of the first round in D-II because its bracket is split into eight regions by geography, meaning the bottom (No. 8) seed could be a top-20 team if you happen to be in a stacked region.
• Texas Tech could be upset-prone depending on health. Starting guard Chance McMillian and starting forward Darrion Williams sat out the Big 12 semis. I’d expect Williams to be back for the tournament, but not so sure on McMillian. I’d be tempted to put Drake in the Sweet 16, but here’s one reason to believe in Texas Tech: Coach Grant McCasland is one of McCollum’s best friends and is not going to overlook Drake. In fact, these teams played a secret scrimmage in the preseason — won by Texas Tech — so the Red Raiders already know how good Drake is. Also, JT Toppin is a difficult matchup for a smaller front line.
• Arkansas-Kansas is another matchup that took place in the preseason. The Razorbacks won that one comfortably, but it was in Fayetteville and the Jayhawks were without veteran big man Hunter Dickinson. Though this is not the typical Kansas team, it was playing better down the stretch, and Arkansas could be out of sync trying to work Boogie Fland back into the lineup from a hand injury that sidelined him for two months.
• Kansas-St. John’s is another game with a perfect storyline. Two years ago, Bill Self recruited Dickinson out of the portal, and his addition pushed out Zuby Ejiofor, who has emerged as a star for the Johnnies. Expect this game to go much like Kansas’ recent loss at Houston. Kansas turned the ball over too often against the Cougars, and it will do it again in a low-scoring game that St. John’s will win.
• The Sweet 16 in this region should be awesome. Maryland will play with Florida for about 30 minutes but eventually wear down against the deepest front line in college basketball. St. John’s is one of the few opponents that can give Texas Tech a hard time finding advantageous matchups for JT Toppin and Darrion Williams. If the Red Raiders get hot from 3, they could pull off the upset. They were the only team to beat Houston in Big 12 play, but their health is a concern.
• This sets up a regional final that will be must-watch television, with Florida star Walter Clayton facing his old coach Rick Pitino — Clayton started his career at Iona — and one of the sport’s all-time best coaches squaring off against one of its best young ones, Todd Golden. The Gators should be prepared from the three games they played against another blue-collar team with a dominant defense in Tennessee. (Florida won two of three.) St. John’s might be the defense best equipped to slow the Gators, but Florida’s 3-point shooting will be the difference.
East Region
• Oregon-Liberty is one of the few spots where I went with an upset. Like Drake, Liberty can control the pace and is one of the best 3-point shooting teams in the country. Oregon prefers to play with pace. It’s not usually a good strategy to bet against Ducks coach Dana Altman in March, but Ritchie McKay is one of the mid-major level’s best coaches, and this is the best team he’s taken to the tournament since 2019 when Liberty upset Mississippi State in the first round.
• VCU is a concerning matchup for BYU. It’s going to take a great defensive team to knock off the Cougars, and that’s what VCU is. But BYU was on a roll recently until it lost by 20 to Houston in the Big 12 semis, and I’m just going to chalk that up to the fact playing Houston is unlike playing anyone else in college basketball. Under first-year coach Kevin Young, BYU has one of the best offenses in the country and has been playing with a ton of confidence.
• Wisconsin-BYU could be one of the most entertaining games of the tournament. Both teams shoot a lot of 3s, play with beautiful ball movement and are solid but not elite on the defensive end. The Badgers are the slightly better team and worry about BYU’s ability to slow down John Tonje, but I have to pick some kind of upset, and BYU has been playing more like a top-three seed as of late. This is close to a coin flip.
• Saint Mary’s could give Alabama issues if it can control the pace, but the Gaels would need to hit double-digit 3s to keep up. They haven’t done that since Jan. 11.
• If you want to pick Duke to get upset, the Sweet 16 might be a decent spot. Duke beat Arizona by 14 in Tucson earlier this season, but the Wildcats have improved as much as anyone since November, mostly because of the emergence of Henri Veesaar. The Wildcats’ bigs are athletic enough to at least match up with Cooper Flagg, but it would take Caleb Love’s going nuclear to pull off the upset. I’m tempted but ultimately too much of a believer in this Duke team.
• Speaking of Duke, some might fade the Blue Devils because of the weak ACC they dominated. Let me remind you that Gonzaga has made the national championship game twice coming out of the West Coast Conference. If anything, the easier schedule helped Jon Scheyer find another asset. I’m not sure he would have experimented with playing freshman sharpshooter Isaiah Evans if Duke was playing in a league like the SEC.
• Duke-Alabama could be another great Elite Eight game. My worry for the Crimson Tide is Grant Nelson’s health. Nelson injured his knee against Florida in the SEC tournament semifinals, and Alabama will need him at 100 percent to knock off Duke. The Crimson Tide are another team with the size and athleticism up front to deal with the Blue Devils, but Duke wing Kon Knueppel could be a matchup problem. The size and strength of Sion James could also give Crimson Tide leading scorer Mark Sears some issues. I wouldn’t blame anyone for picking Alabama to get back to the Final Four, but Duke and Florida were the two teams I knew pre-bracket I was taking at least to the Final Four, and I’m not budging off that strategy.
Midwest Region
• Houston cannot love the idea of seeing Gonzaga, No. 9 at KenPom, in the second round. The Zags have made nine consecutive Sweet 16s and always seem to be peaking in March. But the Zags lost to Saint Mary’s twice in low-possession games, and Houston has taken its elite defense to another level.
• My buddy Seth Davis took High Point and McNeese in the Round of 64 in this region, and I was tempted to do the same. Will Wade’s Cowboys played Alabama and Mississippi State close in the nonconference, and the talent gap isn’t going to be that big against Clemson. I am going with High Point for a few reasons. High Point has one of the best offenses at the mid-major level. The Panthers, coached by former Creighton assistant Alan Huss, make 57.4 percent of their 2s, and Purdue has struggled defensively inside the arc this year without Zach Edey, ranking 350th out of 364 D-I teams in 2-point percentage defense. The health of Fletcher Loyer, who injured his elbow in the Boilermakers’ Big Ten tournament loss to Michigan, is also a concern. High Point gets by Purdue, but I’m sticking with my rule of no mid-majors past the second round.
• Illinois has been a wild ride this year. Every time I start to believe in the Illini, they give me good reason to jump off the bandwagon. But they have been much better with a healthy Tomislav Ivisic, and he was starting to play better until the loss to Maryland in the Big Ten quarterfinal. Kentucky, meanwhile, is limping into the tournament and has been injury-riddled all season. If Lamont Butler were back to his usual self, I’d maybe lean Kentucky, but it doesn’t seem like his shoulder is ever going to be the same.
• Tennessee was the one No. 2 seed I was convinced I wouldn’t pick to make the Elite Eight about a week ago, but then I watched the SEC tournament. The Vols’ offense seems to have new life with Jordan Gainey catching fire. UCLA is good enough to pull off the second-round upset. We already watched the Illini almost beat Tennessee in mid-December, when Gainey helped the Vols escape Champaign with a buzzer-beater. I wouldn’t blame someone for falling for the Illini, but I’m betting on experience.
• Houston-Tennessee is a Spider-Man meme Elite Eight matchup: old rosters, legendary coaches, great defenses and offenses that rely on shot-making guards. I just trust Houston’s guards to consistently make shots at a higher clip. This is Kelvin Sampson’s best offensive team at Houston, and Milos Uzan, who starred in the Big 12 title game, will be the difference in this one as well. But if you want to deviate from my silly chalky ways, this might be a good spot. Sampson told me Saturday he thinks the four best SEC teams might be the four best teams in the country, so maybe we should listen to him. But I’m betting on the Cougars, who will enter this tournament (mostly) healthy for the first time since 2021, a year when they made the Final Four.
(Photo of Alijah Martin: James Gilbert / Getty Images)
Sports
2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
After its massive 1-0 win over South Korea on Thursday night, Mexico has won Group A and officially clinched a spot in the knockout round.
El Tri will play its Round of 32 game in Mexico City, and will face the third-place finisher in either Group C/E/F/H/I.
This is the fourth time that Mexico has topped the group stage of a World Cup, with the other three coming in 1986, 1994 and 2002.
With the win, Mexico remains unbeaten in World Cup group games at home, going a combined 6-2-0 (W-D-L), with two wins and a draw in 1970 and 1986, and now two wins in 2026.
Before the tournament began, Mexico was listed at +6500 to win the World Cup. Now, after winning its first two games of the tournament, Mexico has surged up the oddsboard to +5000.
Can Mexico build off its first two matches and make a deep run in this tournament? Let’s check out the updated odds for El Tri as of June 19.
This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.
Team Mexico — Stage of Elimination
Last 32: +125 (bet $10 to win $22.50 total)
Last 16: +135 (bet $10 to win $23.50 total)
Quarterfinals: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Semifinals: +1600 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Runner-up: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Outright winner: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)
Mexico is currently +5000 to win the 2026 FIFA World Cup after winning Group A (Getty Images).
Mexico’s Past World Cup Results:
1930: Group stage
1934: Did not qualify
1938: Withdrew
1950: Group stage
1954: Group stage
1958: Group stage
1962: Group stage
1966: Group stage
1970: Quarterfinals
1974: Did not qualify
1978: Group stage
1982: Did not qualify
1986: Quarterfinals
1990: Banned
1994: Round of 16
1998: Round of 16
2002: Round of 16
2006: Round of 16
2010: Round of 16
2014: Round of 16
2018: Round of 16
2022: Group stage
2026: TBD
What to know: Mexico has made a habit of being in the running, but never really being in the running. Make sense? Consider this: El Tri made it out of the group stage in seven consecutive World Cups (1994-2018), but never made it past the Round of 16 in any of those years. In 2022, Mexico failed to make it out of the group stage, and it will look to get back to its winning ways in 2026 after a great start to the tournament. With its win Thursday night, Mexico has now advanced to the knockout stage in eight of the last nine World Cups. It is important to note, however, that Mexico has never made it past the quarterfinals at a FIFA men’s World Cup.
Sports
Goalkeeper Raúl Rangel’s elite play and South Korea’s mistake help Mexico advance
GUADALAJARA, Mexico — Three and a half years after its biggest failure on the World Cup stage in half a century, the Mexican national team needed only two games to advance to the knockout round of this year’s tournament as winner of Group A.
Mexico’s defense held off a spirited final push by South Korea, earning a 1-0 win on Thursday night at Guadalajara Stadium in front of a fiery announced sellout crowd of 45,522.
“It was a very tough game,” Mexico coach Javier Aguirre said.
Goalkeeper Kim Seung-gyu made a mistake in the 50th minute, failing to stop what appeared to be a simple cross and bobbling the ball. That allowed Mexico’s Luis Romo to easily tap the ball into the net and claim a 1-0 lead.
“In the end, a mistake was going to tip the scales,” Aguirre said.
Mexico goalkeeper Raúl Rangel blocks a shot from South Korea’s Son Heung-min during their World Cup match at Guadalajara Stadium on Thursday.
(Natacha Pisarenko / Ap Photo/natacha Pisarenko)
“You always want to be there; I felt it, and I got the chance,” said Romo, who started the game after starting the opener on the bench — a strategic change by the Mexican coach that paid off.
South Korea put pressure on the Mexican team throughout the game. Late in the scoreless first half, Jae-sung Lee came close to giving South Korea the lead. Aguirre hoped his team would shake off nerves following the emotional opener at Azteca Stadium and show more bite in its second game against South Korea, but his team didn’t have much power behind its attack during the game’s first 45 minutes.
The crowd in Guadalajara grew frustrated and began booing the Mexican national team’s performance at the end of the first half.
Mexico, however, won back their cheers when it capitalized on South Korea’s costly mistake and converted it into a goal.
Obed Vargas replaced Romo in the 71st minute and was close to scoring a spectacular goal if not for Seung-gyu’s save.
El Tri earned a win without any other goals thanks, in part, to a great night by goalkeeper Raúl Rangel, who stopped a header by Cho Gue-sung in the 87th minute. Captain Edson Álvarez helped turn away South Korea’s attack late, holding up relatively well despite having left ankle surgery during the past year.
“It was just a reflex,” said Rangel, whose club team Chivas plays at at Guadalajara Stadium. “I was very focused and stepped up when the team needed me, and I’m happy about that.”
LAFC star and South Korea captain Son Heung-min fired one shot over Mexico’s goalkeeper in the first half, but Álvarez cleared it off the line before the referee ruled Son was offsides.
South Korea finished controlling possession 58% of the time, but it only earned two shots on target.
“It wasn’t a good game because they didn’t let us do much,” Aguirre said.
Mexico was coming off a comfortable 2-0 victory over South Africa, while the South Koreans had defeated the Czech Republic 2-1, marking their first World Cup opening-match win since 2010.
During the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, Mexico was eliminated in the group stage for the first time since 1978, breaking a streak of seven consecutive appearances in the knockout rounds. However, playing on home soil, the team’s goal is to emulate El Tri’s achievements in 1970 and 1986, when they reached the quarterfinals — the country’s best World Cup finish.
Due to the new 48-team format, Mexico would need to win two knockout-round matches and reach a sixth game to realize its goals.
“We’re taking it one step at a time; first, there’s the third game,” Romo said.
Mexico’s Luis Romo celebrates with his teammates after scoring during a match against South Korea at Guadalajara Stadium on Thursday.
(Natacha Pisarenko / Associated Press)
After the win over South Korea, Mexico will close out group play against Czechia at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City on Wednesday. El Tri will get to play the first two games of the knockout round — should it win the first one — at Azteca Stadium, a venue where it has never lost a World Cup game.
South Korea has four points and will be favored when it plays South Africa Wednesday in Monterrey. If South Korea wins the match, it would be the Group A runner-up and advance to play the Group B runner-up on June 28 at SoFi Stadium.
“We want all nine points,” Vargas said of Mexico’s goal entering its next game against Czechia.
Sports
2026 FIFA World Cup Golden Boot Race Tracker: Lionel Messi Is Alone At The Top
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Who’ll win the Golden Boot at the 2026 FIFA World Cup? The race is on for who’ll score the most goals at the tournament, and it is set to be one of the tournament’s most closely watched storylines.
Several of the world’s top forwards will be aiming to finish as the competition’s leading goalscorer. Kylian Mbappé enters the tournament after winning the Golden Boot at the 2022 FIFA World Cup, while Harry Kane, Erling Haaland, Lionel Messi, and Mikel Oyarzabal are among the other players expected to challenge for the award.
And check out our list of all the 2026 World Cup goals, ranked!
Favorites To Win The Golden Boot
Harry Kane: +310 (bet $10 to win $41 total)
Lionel Messi: +350 (bet $10 to win $45 total)
Kylian Mbappé: +350 (bet $10 to win $45 total)
Erling Haaland: +1000 (bet $10 to win $110 total)
Kai Havertz: +1300 (bet $10 to win $140 total)
Vinícius Júnior: +3300 (bet $10 to win $340 total)
Folarin Balogun: +3500 (bet $10 to win $360 total)
Mikel Oyarzabal: +3500 (bet $10 to win $360 total)
Lamine Yamal: +3500 (bet $10 to win $360 total)
Raphinha: +4500 (bet $10 to win $460 total)
Michael Olise: +4500 (bet $10 to win $460 total)
Romelu Lukaku: +4500 (bet $10 to win $460 total)
Viktor Gyökeres: +4500 (bet $10 to win $460 total)
Cody Gakpo: +5500 (bet $10 to win $560 total)
Cristiano Ronaldo: +5500 (bet $10 to win $560 total)
3 Goals
Lionel Messi (Argentina)
2 Goals
Johan Manzambi (Switzerland)
Harry Kane (England)
Erling Haaland (Norway)
Kylian Mbappé (France)
Harry Kane (England)
Elijah Just (New Zealand)
Yasin Ayari (Sweden)
Kai Havertz (Germany)
Folarin Balogun (USA)
1 Goal
Granit Xhaka (Switzerland)
Rubén Vargas (Switzerland)
Ermin Mahmic (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Michal Sadilek (Czechia)
Teboho Mokoena (South Africa)
Jáminton Campaz (Colombia)
Luis Díaz (Colombia)
Daniel Muñoz (Colombia)
Abbosbek Fayzullaev (Uzbekistan)
Caleb Yirenkyi (Ghana)
Jude Bellingham (England)
Marcus Rashford (England)
Martin Baturina (Croatia)
Petar Musa (Croatia)
Yoane Wissa (DR Congo)
João Neves (Portugal)
Marko Arnautović (Austria)
Jude Bellingham (England)
Marcus Rashford (England)
Yoane Wissa (DR Congo)
João Neves (Portugal)
Caleb Yirenkyi (Ghana)
Ali Olwan (Jordan)
Romano Schmid (Austria)
Leo Østigard (Norway)
Ayman Hussein (Iraq)
Ibrahim Mbaye (Senegal)
Bradley Barcola (France)
Ramin Rezaeian (Iran)
Mohammad Mohebbi (Iran)
Maxi Araújo (Uruguay)
Abdulelah Al-Amri (Saudi Arabia)
Emam Ashour (Egypt)
Alexander Isak (Sweden)
Viktor Gyökeres (Sweden)
Mattias Svanberg (Sweden)
Omar Rekik (Tunisia)
Amad Diallo (Ivory Coast)
Keito Nakamura (Japan)
Daichi Kamada (Japan)
Virgil van Dijk (Netherlands)
Crysencio Summerville (Netherlands)
Felix Nmecha (Germany)
Nico Schlotterbeck (Germany)
Jamal Musiala (Germany)
Nathaniel Brown (Germany)
Deniz Undav (Germany)
Connor Metcalfe (Australia)
Nestory Irankunda (Australia)
John McGinn (Scotland)
Ismael Saibari (Morocco)
Vinícius Júnior (Brazil)
Breel Embolo (Switzerland)
Gio Reyna (USA)
Mauricio (Paraguay)
Cyle Larin (Canada)
Jovo Lukić (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Ladislav Krejcí (Czechia)
Julián Quiñones (Mexico)
Raúl Jimenez (Mexico)
Hwang In-Beom (South Korea)
Oh Hyeon-Gyu (South Korea)
Own Goals
Yazan Al-Arab (Jordan; 1)
Ayman Hussein (Iraq; 1)
Mohamed Hany (Egypt; 1)
Miro Muheim (Switzerland; 1)
Damián Bobadilla (Paraguay; 1)
Last 5 Golden Boot Winners
- 2022 (Qatar): Kylian Mbappé (France) – 8 goals
- 2018 (Russia): Harry Kane (England) – 6 goals
- 2014 (Brazil): James Rodríguez (Colombia) – 6 goals
- 2010 (South Africa): Thomas Müller (Germany) – 5 goals
- 2006 (Germany): Miroslav Klose (Germany) – 5 goals
-
Technology8 minutes agoBarret Zoph is out at OpenAI again after just five months
-
World13 minutes agoIran hardliner behind US deal warns Tehran won’t honor agreement if Trump fails to deliver
-
Politics20 minutes agoTop GOP lawmaker rallies around conservative school board member facing calls to resign
-
Sports28 minutes ago2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?
-
Technology35 minutes ago6 in 10 identity crimes now begin with a new account
-
Business38 minutes agoJanuary 2025 wildfire victims seek tougher penalties against State Farm over claims handling
-
Entertainment43 minutes agoReview: ‘Sugar,’ with Colin Farrell as an alien private eye, gets a new and improved second season
-
Politics53 minutes agoPolitical watchdog fines Newsom for failing to report $5.5M in solicited donations on time