Connect with us

Rhode Island

Should RI rename Victory Day? The suggestion sparks a war of words

Published

on

Should RI rename Victory Day? The suggestion sparks a war of words


PROVIDENCE – If you want to ignite a war of words at the State House, suggest changing the name of the Rhode Island-only holiday known as Victory Day.

That’s what happened this week – for the second year in a row – when a public hearing was held on Rep. Jennifer Stewart’s bill to change the name of the holiday that falls on the second Monday of August from “Victory Day” to “Peace and Remembrance Day.”

Despite its official name, the bill [H7326], which sparked this heated exchange, notes that Victory Day is still known to many as “Victory over Japan Day … given the proximity of the holiday’s date” to the use of the atomic bombs on Japan and the announcement, soon after, of Japan’s surrender.

Advertisement

Changing the name to “Peace & Remembrance Day,” would “recognize that the U.S. engaged in racially discriminatory treatment of first and second generation Japanese Americans residing on its mainland … [and that] historians have cast doubt on the military necessity of using the atomic bombs,” the bill reads.

Acknowledgment of past wrongdoing or insult to veterans?

“We feel this bill is an insult to our WWII veterans and to the history of World War II,” John P. Gallo Sr., representing the United Veterans Council of Rhode Island, wrote legislators about the bill.

“This bill is one more attempt to whitewash our history and erase our past,” wrote Tom Padwa of Warren. “Yes, the atomic bomb attacks on Japan had horrific consequences, but let’s not forget that they happened.”

Advertisement

From the other side of the debate came letters of support for the legislation that Stewart, a Pawtucket Democrat, proposed, including from Asian-American Rhode Islander Catherine Chung, who wrote:

“Our country’s dark history of the state-sanctioned incarceration of approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II, followed by the prohibition of their return to the West Coast, left a legacy of intergenerational trauma.”

“Renaming ‘Victory Day’ will symbolize an acknowledgment of past wrongdoing and our state’s commitmentto rectifying historical injustices,” she continued.

Added Alex Denisevich of East Greenwich, acknowledging he has lived in Rhode Island for only seven years, but “for all of those years, I am always ashamed to tell friends, family members, whoever, that the reason I have off onthe second Monday of August is because the state I now live in refuses to stop celebrating a holiday thatexists only to celebrate the murder of millions of people.”

What is Victory Day: And why is Rhode Island the only state that observes it?

Advertisement

Debate spills onto the House floor

In her turn at the microphone before the House Committee on Special Legislation, Stewart, who teaches history and political science at Moses Brown School in Providence, said changing the name would also recognize that “military victories are built on civilian injury and death.”

“This is a fact we need to remember … when we watch the news about Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan, Syria and other places,” she said.

But Rep. Patricia Morgan, R-West Warwick, argued back: “This is a victory day and it’s a victory day for America because we had people who were willing to step up for our values.” She called the legislation an “atrocity” tantamount to “taking away the honor and the bravery that those men deserve.”

Stewart responded: “This bill … does not take away anything. There’s Veterans Day and there’s Memorial Day as well [but] we are the only state that has a Victory Day, and as far as I understand, we weren’t the only state in the United States who had people who sacrificed and fought in WWII and subsequent wars.”

Rep. Samuel Azzinaro, D-Westerly, recalling the bombing of Pearl Harbor, said he’s proud “we are the only state that recognizes this day as a ‘Victory Day’ because it was unconscionable what happened to us on that December 7th Sunday morning.”

Advertisement

The bill was held for further study.



Source link

Rhode Island

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick

Published

on

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick


WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.

Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.

According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.

The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.

Advertisement

The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.

A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.

State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.

The investigation remains ongoing.

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Advertisement

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information

Published

on

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information


A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.

Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.

Advertisement

McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.

“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.

Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”

“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”

The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.

Advertisement

The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.

The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.

At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.

The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Single Dad Says Grandparents’ Rights Trial Has Cost Him More Than $500K, but He'll Do ‘Whatever It Takes’ to Keep Daughter Safe

Published

on

Single Dad Says Grandparents’ Rights Trial Has Cost Him More Than 0K, but He'll Do ‘Whatever It Takes’ to Keep Daughter Safe


As the two-year anniversary of his wife’s death approaches, widowed single father Scott Naso is sounding an alarm to fellow parents across the country — and especially in Rhode Island, where he lives with his now 4-year-old daughter, Laila.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending