World
European countries grapple with internal politics over nuclear energy
Emmanuel Macron has championed the revival of France’s nuclear program as a central focus of his second presidential term.
With the emphasis on job creation, green investments, and advancements in mini-reactors, the challenges accompanying this nuclear resurgence are manifold.
The President of the Republic had underscored this commitment during his re-election campaign in May 2022. Months earlier, during a visit to the Arabelle turbine manufacturing site in Belfort, Macron unveiled an ambitious nuclear program.
According to the President, this is the main solution to meet the burgeoning electricity demand driven by increased electrification, to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, and sustain competitive electricity prices to support French businesses.
Macron has unabashedly hailed nuclear power as a “technology of the future”. France’s current fleet of electricity production reactors comprises 56 pressurised water reactors (PWR), classified as “generation II”, along with an EPR (European Pressurised Water Reactor) reactor presently under construction in Flamanville, Manche, designated as “generation III” .
In January, President Emmanuel Macron declared his intention to outline “the primary directions for the next 8” EPR reactors from the summer onwards, as part of the nuclear power revival, following the launch of six new EPR reactors, during a press conference.
Nuclear controversy in Germany
Whilst 65 to 70 percent of electricity in France is generated by nuclear, Germany’s figure was only 1.4 percent in 2023. It is indicative of a complicated relationship between Germany’s political parties and nuclear power.
Amid concerns over gas supplies following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, three policy options were considered by the government: extending the use of existing nuclear fuel, purchasing new fuel elements, or reopening the recently shut-down plants. The Green Party strongly opposed restarting nuclear power stations.
The handling of Germany’s nuclear phase-out during the 2022 energy crisis has drawn scrutiny towards the country’s economic and environment ministries, both under Green Party leadership, for their approach to closing the last three nuclear power plants.
German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, Robert Habeck, found himself redirected to the Bundestag’s energy committee to defend his controversial policy amid the energy crisis.
Despite internal discussions and assessments supporting the feasibility of extending the nuclear plants’ lifespans, a change in direction occurred within the environment ministry, citing “reasons of nuclear safety”.
Minister Habeck defended his ministry’s actions, emphasising the need to focus on replacing Russian natural gas rather than relying on nuclear energy for electricity.
The decision to extend the life of the last three nuclear power plants was eventually reached several months later, reflecting a compromise pushed by the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) .
The handling of this matter has faced criticism from Germany’s conservative opposition, who argue that the process lacked transparency and openness.
Spain’s ongoing debate
Spain’s energy strategy remains a subject of debate, with differing viewpoints on the role of nuclear and renewable energies in achieving sustainability and energy independence.
The Spanish government announced in December plans to phase out the country’s nuclear reactors, with the first plant shutdown scheduled for 2027.
The energy landscape is influenced by Russia’s strategic leveraging of its gas production capacity and the disruption caused by disputes such as the recent gas supply cut-off by Algeria to Morocco, affecting one of Spain’s gas supply routes.
Greenpeace Spain calls for an accelerated transition away from nuclear energy, critiquing Spain’s energy plan for not prioritising a rapid shift towards 100% renewable energy.
José Luis García, responsible for Greenpeace’s Climate Emergency program, challenges the classification of nuclear energy as ‘green’, emphasising the need to address broader environmental risks associated with nuclear power .
While France looks to bolster its energy security by embracing nuclear power alongside renewables, Spain remains steadfast in its commitment to achieve complete denuclearisation by 2035, as outlined in its Comprehensive National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 (Pniec). Including two nuclear powerplants 100 kilometres from the Portuguese border.
Portugal’s phasing out nuclear, Italy phasing in
Over the past few years, Portugal has taken significant step towards dismantling its long-serving nuclear reactor, which had been instrumental in scientific research and education for over five decades.
Portugal has taken a firm stance against nuclear energy, with former Minister of Environment and Climate Action, João Pedro Matos Fernandes, highlighting its perceived shortcomings during the 26th United Nations climate conference (COP26) in Glasgow.
He emphasised that nuclear energy is deemed unsafe, unsustainable, and economically burdensome.
Italy’s nuclear history saw all four plants closed following a 1990 referendum. A subsequent attempt to reintroduce nuclear power was halted by a 2011 referendum.
Italy’s Chamber of Deputies has launched an inquiry into the role of nuclear energy in its energy transition. The country, the only G7 nation without operating nuclear power stations, shut down its last plant over 30 years ago.
The inquiry aims to explore nuclear energy’s potential contribution to Italy’s decarbonisation by 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. It was supported by pro-nuclear members but faced abstention from others.
Minister of Environment in Italy, which is hosting the G7 meeting this year, said in a recent speech, “We have continued to work with important private companies both on the fission front, therefore on the new generation NUCLEAR with small reactors, and on the fusion front”
Last March, the Minister of Infrastructure and Transport and Deputy Prime Minister Salvini also said that a modern and industrialised country “cannot say no to nuclear energy.”
World
What Israel wants from an Iran peace deal: No enrichment, missile limits and strict enforcement
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
As President Donald Trump signals progress toward a possible agreement with Iran, Israeli officials and analysts increasingly are outlining what Jerusalem believes any deal must include to prevent Tehran from rebuilding its military and regional power.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Wednesday that Israel and the United States remain in “full coordination” as negotiations continue.
“We share common objectives, and the most important objective is the removal of the enriched material from Iran, all the enriched material, and the dismantling of Iran’s enrichment capabilities,” Netanyahu said at the opening of a security cabinet meeting.
US AND IRAN CLASH OVER URANIUM ENRICHMENT AS NUCLEAR TALKS RESUME IN ROME
Bushehr nuclear plant in Iran, on April 29, 2024. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
“We’ve had very good talks over the last 24 hours, and it’s very possible that we’ll make a deal,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office Wednesday.
At the same time, Trump warned that if negotiations fail, “we’ll have to go a big step further.”
For Israel, the question is not simply whether the war ends, but whether Iran emerges from negotiations weakened or repositioned to rebuild. Israeli officials fear a weak agreement could allow Tehran to preserve strategic capabilities, regain economic breathing room and eventually restore the regional network of armed groups that threatened Israel before the war. Jerusalem is also seeking guarantees that any future deal preserves military leverage and freedom of action if Iran violates its commitments.
Against that backdrop, Israeli analysts say Jerusalem’s red lines focus on four core areas: dismantling Iran’s enrichment infrastructure, restricting its ballistic missile program, preventing Tehran from rebuilding Hezbollah and Hamas, and ensuring the regime does not gain political legitimacy or strategic relief from the negotiations.
No enrichment, no sunsets
On the nuclear issue, former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror said Israel’s position remains uncompromising.
“Weaponized uranium must leave Iran,” Amidror said. “The Iranians must not be allowed to enrich uranium.”
Israeli journalist and commentator Nadav Eyal agreed, adding that Israel is seeking a much stricter framework than previous agreements.
“Israel wants Iran to stop enrichment for as long as possible and for the enriched material to leave Iran,” Eyal said, adding that Jerusalem is looking for “an arms control agreement that would be extensive and robust.”
An unclassified image released by U.S. Central Command showing strikes on Iran. (U.S. Central Command/Reuters)
Avner Golov, vice president of the Mind Israel think tank, told Fox News Digital that Israel also wants Iran’s underground nuclear infrastructure dismantled entirely.
“In the nuclear arena, what matters is the removal of the enriched material, the destruction of the underground facilities, including those still being built, and a prohibition on new sites,” Golov said.
Golov also warned against “sunset clauses” that would allow restrictions to expire after several years.
“There must be an agreement without sunsets,” he said, calling for “unprecedented monitoring and supervision, anywhere, under any conditions and not dependent on Iranian approval.”
Jonathan Ruhe, Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) fellow for American strategy, told Fox News Digital, “Ultimately the United States and Israel should have strongly similar redlines for an acceptable deal,” he said, including “shutting down Iran’s nuclear weapons program completely, permanently and verifiably.”
Ruhe said that goes beyond Iran handing over highly enriched uranium and includes shutting down remaining enrichment-related facilities at Pickaxe and Isfahan.
UN’S ATOMIC AGENCY’S IRAN POLICY GETS MIXED REVIEWS FROM EXPERTS AFTER US-ISRAEL ‘OBLITERATE’ NUCLEAR SITES
President Donald Trump speaks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv on Oct. 13, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Missiles seen as equal threat
Alongside the nuclear issue, Israeli analysts say Iran’s ballistic missile program has become equally central to Israel’s security concerns.
“One of the key questions is whether there will be any sort of limitation on the ballistic missile program of the Iranians,” Eyal said. “Israel sees this as no less of an existential threat than the nuclear issue.”
Amidror warned that without missile restrictions, the threat could eventually extend beyond Israel and Europe.
“If there are no restrictions on the missile program, then missiles that today can reach half of Europe will, within five to 10 years, be able to reach the United States,” he warned.
Golov argued that a nuclear-only agreement would leave Iran free to rebuild a missile shield protecting a future nuclear breakout.
“A deal that focuses only on the nuclear program would allow the Iranians to produce thousands of missiles and create a protective shield around their nuclear program.”
Ruhe similarly said limiting Iran’s missile arsenal must include preventing Iran from rebuilding production capabilities damaged during the war.
IRAN DRAWS MISSILE RED LINE AS ANALYSTS WARN TEHRAN IS STALLING US TALKS
Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system intercepts projectiles over Tel Aviv on Feb. 28, 2026, amid retaliatory missile barrages from Iran targeting Gulf states and Israel. (Jack Guez/AFP)
Hamas, Hezbollah and the proxies question
Another major Israeli concern is that sanctions relief or renewed trade could funnel money back to Iran’s regional proxies.
“Israel is demanding that the Islamic Republic isolate itself from involvement with Lebanon and Gaza and stop supporting armed groups that operate against Israel,” Eyal said.
“For Israel, it is a material issue that the money injected into Iran will not be used to rebuild the proxies in the region,” he added.
Amidror said Iran’s ability to support Hezbollah and Hamas has already been weakened by the collapse of regional supply routes.
“The Iranians cannot effectively support the proxies because there is no longer a land bridge from Iran to Syria,” he said, but warned that if negotiations leave the impression that Washington backed down, Iran’s regional proxies could emerge stronger even after the war.
No ‘victory image’ for Tehran
Ruhe similarly argued that Israel wants to avoid any agreement that restores legitimacy to the Iranian regime without fundamentally weakening it.
“Avoiding anything that legitimates Iran’s regime and abandons the Iranian people” is critical, Ruhe said, including “giving guarantees against future attacks or compensating Tehran for wartime damages.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Satellite imagery shows reinforcement efforts at the Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site, a heavily fortified, deep underground tunnel complex near Iran’s Natanz enrichment site. (Vantor/Handout via Reuters)
Ruhe warned that for Israel, a “bad deal” is ultimately any agreement that restrains Israel’s future freedom of action against Iran and its proxies.
“This is one big reason Iran wants to ensnare the Trump administration in open-ended negotiations that sideline military options and create daylight between Washington and Jerusalem,” Ruhe said.
World
North Korea says it is not bound by any treaty on nuclear non-proliferation
Pyongyang says its status as nuclear-armed state ‘will not change based on external rhetorical claims’.
Published On 7 May 2026
North Korea’s envoy to the United Nations has declared that Pyongyang will not be bound by any treaty on atomic weapons and that no external pressure will change its status as a nuclear-armed state.
Ambassador Kim Song’s statement – carried by state media on Thursday – came as the United States and other countries criticised North Korea’s nuclear programme at the ongoing UN conference reviewing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
list of 4 itemsend of listRecommended Stories
Pyongyang withdrew from the NPT in 2003 and has since conducted six nuclear tests, promoting multiple UN Security Council sanctions.
The country is believed to hold dozens of nuclear warheads.
“At the 11th NPT Review Conference currently under way at UN headquarters, the United States and certain countries following its lead are groundlessly calling into question the current status and exercise of sovereign rights,” Kim said, according to the official Korean Central News Agency.
“The status of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea as a nuclear-armed state will not change based on external rhetorical claims or unilateral desires,” he added.
“To make it clear once again, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea will not be bound by the Non-Proliferation Treaty under any circumstances whatsoever.”
He continued that the country’s status as a nuclear-armed state has been “enshrined in the constitution, transparently declaring the principles of nuclear weapons use”.
North Korea has long insisted that it will not give up its nuclear arsenal, describing its path as “irreversible” and pledging to strengthen its capabilities.
It has sent ground troops and artillery shells to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and observers say Pyongyang is receiving military technology assistance from Moscow in return.
The nine nuclear-armed states – Russia, the US, France, the United Kingdom, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea – possessed 12,241 nuclear warheads in January 2025, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported.
The US and Russia hold nearly 90 percent of nuclear weapons globally and have carried out major programmes to modernise them in recent years, according to SIPRI.
The nuclear issue has been at the heart of the US and Israel’s war on Iran, with US President Donald Trump saying that Tehran – a signatory to the NPT – can never have a nuclear weapon.
Iran denies seeking an atomic weapon and has long demanded Washington acknowledge its right to enrich uranium.
World
Ted Turner, TV Mogul and Philanthropist, Dies at 87
Ted Turner, the charismatic, larger-than-life figure who conquered the world of media, sports and philanthropy, has died, according to a release by Turner Enterprises obtained by CNN. He was 87.
Turner disclosed in September 2018 that he was suffering from Lewy body dementia, a brain disorder that affects memory and other cognitive functions.
Turner, Time Magazine’s Man of the Year in 1991, transformed the world of television, inventing 24-hour news with CNN and pioneering national basic cable. To feed his “superstation,” he made deals that rewrote the rules of sports broadcasting. He was also a sports figure himself, winning the America’s Cup and owning the Atlanta Braves when they won the World Series.
Turner helped change the idea of philanthropy by being one of the first individuals to give away huge sums while still alive, rather than bequeathing them in a will; he donated a record $1 billion to create the United Nations Foundation. “Everybody could be doing more! Nobody’s doing enough. I could be doing more!” he told Variety in a 2012 interview about his passion to make the world a safer and healthier place.
No fiction writer could dream up a character with so many high-stakes gambles that usually paid off, whose life took so many turns and who was present at so many key late-20th-century moments in various fields. In his 2008 autobiography “Call Me Ted,” Turner, who was the grandson of sharecroppers, said his father advised him, “Be sure to set your goals so high that you can’t possibly accomplish them in one lifetime. That way you’ll always have something ahead of you.” He clearly followed that advice.
His first step in media was inheriting his father’s billboard business. He then shifted to television, taking a money-losing UHF television station in Atlanta and transforming it into WTRS, then Turner Broadcasting System. It entered the homes of 2 million cable subscribers as “superstation” TBS via satellite delivery, which led to the blossoming of satellite and cable TV in the mid-’70s. He decided that his channels needed new shows, so he invented TNT and helped pioneer the concept of original programming on basic cable. He also owned MGM for a time, selling the studio and name but retaining the massive library.
He started CNN, as well as other cablers like the Cartoon Network, and invented “Captain Planet and the Planeteers,” a TV toon with an environmental message. Overpopulation and nuclear disarmament were other passionate causes for which he worked and donated tirelessly.
He often joked that his formula for success was “Early to bed, early to rise, work like hell and advertise.”
When he sold the Turner system to Time Warner, he added $1 billion to his income within nine months. In 1997, after receiving an award from the United Nations, he decided to donate the billion — one-third of his wealth — to the org. He gave the U.N. the money just in time. When Time Warner merged with AOL in 2000, the stock plummeted, and he lost 80% of his wealth within two years.
He said later he had voted to approve the merger against his better judgment and he soon lost even more when he was unceremoniously ousted from the company.
He continued with philanthropy and activism, fighting nuclear weapons, climate change, fossil fuels and overpopulation.
In 2002, he started a chain of eco-friendly restaurants, Ted’s Montana Grill, whose flagship dish is the bison burger from meat raised on the land he owned spread across six states. By 2010, he owned 2 million acres. He was the largest single landowner in the U.S. for years until he was surpassed by Liberty Media founder and chief John Malone. He spent a good portion of his final years after leaving Time Warner on his 113,000-acre ranch near Bozeman, Mont.
Then there were his sports achievements: He won the America’s Cup and Fastnet, becoming the first person to be named yachtsman of the year four times, and bought the Atlanta Braves, who won the World Series in 1995. He bought the baseball team in a calculated move to boost the ratings of his local station.
He was also married three times, including a 10-year marriage to Jane Fonda, and had five children.
In person he could be gregarious and aw-shucks friendly but was also outspoken and confrontational, which earned him the nickname the Mouth of the South. His feud with Rupert Murdoch, which began over a yachting accident, led Turner to challenge him to fistfights; in 2003, he asserted that Murdoch had helped start the Iraq War through advocacy of the military campaign on Fox News and other outlets, and in 2011, he declared that Murdoch ought to resign from News Corp. in the wake of the phone hacking scandal.
Though Turner suffered the occasional gambler’s setback, his was a life marked mainly by triumphs and staggering successes. “It was,” fellow media mogul John Malone once said, “as if God were on his side.”
He was a complex person who fought at all times to protect his vulnerable self. As an aide warned an interviewer once, “If he doesn’t want to answer a question, you’ll know it. He’ll just give one or two-word answers and you can’t go back to that topic.” He described himself as having bipolar depression, but he avoided psychiatry and too much self-analysis.
In Turner’s 2008 memoir “Call Me Ted,” Jane Fonda described Turner’s childhood, with beatings and psychological manipulations, as “complete toxicity.” She said Turner couldn’t understand why she cried when he described his youth and said, “There’s a fear of abandonment that is deeper than with anyone I’ve ever known. As a result, he needs constant companionship, and keeping up with him can be exhausting.” She said he couldn’t sit still and his nervous energy “almost crackles in the air.”
In the same book, Dick Parsons, president of Time Warner in 1995, when it bought Turner’s company, recalled his first meeting with the exec. Turner was talking about overcoming adversity and told Parsons, “You were born black — bad break! But you know, you worked hard and you overcame it.” Parsons said he nearly fell out of his chair but concluded that Turner didn’t possess the self-censorship mechanism that prevents most people from blurting out inappropriate ideas. “But because he’s such a fundamentally guileless and genuine guy, he gets away with it.”
Robert Edward Turner III was born in Cincinnati. His family moved to Atlanta when Turner was 9 and his father, Ed, struggled in vain to succeed with his small billboard company. When his father committed suicide in 1963, Ted inherited the business and was determined to make it a success. Under his direction, the company earned enough money to allow Turner in 1970 to buy Atlanta-based UHF station Channel 17, which was losing upward of $500,000 annually.
He started counterprogramming network fare by showing movies, old series like “The Andy Griffith Show” and Atlanta Braves games. By 1972, the station was breaking even. Looking to expand, he embraced CATV (community antenna TV, as cable television was called). By December 1976, WTCG had a satellite transmission and was renamed the WTBS “superstation.”
In the early days, it reached 2 million cable subscribers’ homes. By 1986, 34 million additional viewers had been added, and the network’s annual profits had soared to more than $70 million.
In the intervening years, Turner had dabbled in other interests. Making use of the yachting expertise he had acquired while attending Brown U., Turner gained worldwide recognition for winning the 1977 America’s Cup on his yacht Courageous. He was, he later admitted, “a little tipsy” as he accepted the trophy, and in press coverage he earned the nickname “Captain Outrageous.” He also won the Fastnet race and was named yachtsman of the year in 1970, ’73, ’77 and ’79.
He also began snapping up Atlanta’s sports teams, purchasing the baseball Braves and the basketball Hawks in 1976 and ’77, respectively. Turner even managed the Braves personally for one game during a particularly bad season early in his ownership.
Turner’s biggest gamble of all, perhaps, came in 1980, when he launched the first 24-hour all-news cable channel, CNN. Cable carriers declined to help with the startup costs, so Turner was left to go it alone, coming up with $21 million from the sale of one of his independent stations, in Charlotte, N.C., to start the channel.
As he said in his book, “I’m often asked if we ever did any formal research on the viability of a 24-hour cable news, and my answer is no. I had spent over five years thinking about it, and it was time to get going.”
Despite its relatively low-budget startup, CNN caught on quickly. Turner helped the network in its early years by using profits from WTBS. He started up sister channel Headline News in 1982, and by 1985, the two were earning their own keep. CNN would grow in both profits and reputation in later years with its impressive up-to-the-minute coverage of the 1986 Challenger disaster and, more significantly, the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
CNN was later challenged by rivals like Fox News and MSNBC. It lost its biggest advocate when Turner was pushed out and it struggled to toe a nonpartisan political line between right and left.
“If I’d been running CNN it would have stayed more with international news coverage than it has today,” Turner said in a 2012 interview with Variety. “It would have stuck with more series news. Be damned with ratings! Biggest isn’t always best. Best is what’s best.”
In 1985, at a time when world tensions had crippled the Olympics with back-to-back Games marred by U.S.- and U.S.S.R.-led boycotts, Turner helped set up the Goodwill Games as an alternate means for international amateur athletes to compete, without the interference of politics.
And, in 1990, he launched SportsSouth, providing coverage of his Braves and Hawks as well as college football, auto racing, golf and other sporting events throughout Georgia and six other Southern states.
In one of his few career defeats, Turner failed in a bid to purchase CBS in 1986, but he consoled himself the same year by paying what was generally considered to be a generous $1.6 billion for the MGM/UA Entertainment Co.
With the studio came some 4,000 films, which included classics from MGM, RKO and pre-1950 Warner Bros. films. Making use of that impressive library, Turner launched Turner Network Television (TNT) in 1988. In 1993, he created yet another outlet for vintage cinema with the launch of Turner Classic Movies.
While he did bring a significant number of classic movies to viewers, Turner caused a considerable stir among some old-time movie buffs, film historians and social critics for his decision to “colorize” many of the films in his library in an attempt to make them more popular with later generations of TV viewers.
In 1990, Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi army invaded Kuwait, and most networks and news orgs began evacuating news teams as the U.S. began building toward Operation Desert Storm. The CNN newsies opted to stay. On Jan. 16, 1991, a CNN team was covering Baghdad as bombs began to fall — and a war was televised live from behind the lines. It was a precedent-setting move that seemed to cap Turner’s career as the reigning monarch of cable, if not TV in general. Time magazine crowned him Man of the Year in ’91, praising him for turning “viewers in 150 countries into instant witnesses of history.” Further, the magazine credited Turner as having basically reinvented the news, changing it “from something that has happened to something that is happening at the very moment you are hearing it.”
His global view was firmly in place by this point. He banned the use of the word “foreign” within any Turner Broadcasting company, believing it was pejorative, and preferring “international.”
In 1993, Turner turned toward the business of new feature films by purchasing Castle Rock Entertainment and New Line Cinema. The latter handled Turner’s made-for-TNT Civil War epic, “Gettysburg,” featuring Turner in a cameo as a Confederate colonel killed in the battle.
Turner found himself at the vanguard of yet another movement — the intra-cable-company merger mania —when he sold Turner Broadcasting to Time Warner for $7.5 billion. After the deal was OK’d by the Federal Trade Commission in ’96, Turner took a seemingly subservient role as vice chairman of Time Warner, though he remained the company’s largest shareholder.
He remained the largest shareholder after the acquisition of Time Warner for almost $200 billion by AOL in 2000. But the pairing of those two companies proved disastrous for everyone, including Turner. The dot-com mania of the late-20th century meant that Wall Street was overly optimistic about growth potential: Though Time Warner’s revenue was five times as large as AOL’s, its capitalization was only half that of the Internet giant.
After the merger, AOL TW stock plunged, and Turner was forced out of the company. In 30 months, Turner’s net worth plummeted from $10 billion to $2 billion. Or, as he calculated, he was losing nearly $10 million each day for 2½ years.
The end of his role at Time Warner essentially ended his connection to showbiz. However, he still had his restaurants and, more important, his philanthropy and causes. Over the years, he had created the Goodwill Games, the Better World Society, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (in 2001) and the Turner Foundation. But his biggest single contribution was his creation of the United Nations Foundation, focusing on decreasing child mortality, boosting technology for health, empowering females, charting new energy, World Heritage and a stronger U.N.
Nothing But Nets, only one of the many campaigns financed by the foundation, has helped cut malaria nearly in half by distributing 1 million mosquito nets in Africa, Asia and other stricken regions since its 2006 launch.
When he decided to give the U.N. $1 billion, or one third of his personal wealth, in 1997, he challenged others of wealth to give away their money more freely. “All the money is in the hands of these few rich people and none of them give any money away,” he said in an interview. “It’s dangerous for them and the country.”
Ted Turner received the 2015 News & Documentary Emmy Award for Lifetime Achievement, as part of the 36th Annual News & Documentary Emmy Awards.
Turner’s three marriages all ended in divorce. He had two children with his first wife, Judy Nye: Laura Lee and Robert Edward IV; and three with his second wife, Jane Smith: Rhett, Beauregard and Jennie.
He and Fonda were married in 1991 and divorced in 2001. He is survived by his five children, 14 grandchildren, and two great-grandchildren.
-
Science5 minutes agoA Landslide in Alaska Set Off a Tsunami. There May Be More to Come.
-
Culture23 minutes agoIn ‘Rocky Horror,’ Luke Evans Finds His Ballad of Sexual Liberation
-
Lifestyle29 minutes agoDonlyn Lyndon, Last Surviving Creator of the Sea Ranch, Dies at 90
-
Education35 minutes agoHow Did You Grow and Change This School Year?
-
Technology41 minutes agoMusk’s biggest loyalist became his biggest liability
-
World47 minutes agoWhat Israel wants from an Iran peace deal: No enrichment, missile limits and strict enforcement
-
Politics53 minutes agoCalifornia immigration judge sues DOJ, alleging she was fired for being a registered Democrat, a woman over 40
-
Health59 minutes ago‘Looksmaxxing’ trend has young men taking hammers to their faces in pursuit of sharper features