Connect with us

Rhode Island

Which teams are dominating the RI softball scene? Let Eric Rueb’s midseason ranks tell you

Published

on

Which teams are dominating the RI softball scene? Let Eric Rueb’s midseason ranks tell you


The biggest surprise of the season took place Friday afternoon at the Brayton Avenue Sports Complex.

I was running late to get to the Tiverton-Cranston East game. I’m not an excuse guy, but my early afternoon range session took longer than expected and I miscalculated how long the drive was. I wasn’t worried, because I felt like there was a zero percent chance the Tigers were going to be able to get over the bridge and to Cranston East for the game to start remotely close to on time.

Boy was I wrong.

Advertisement

Kudos to Tiverton – which looked like it was in a small white school bus emblazoned with the school name vs. the traditional large yellow bus – for arriving on time. Games starting late due to busing issues or bridge traffic is an almost daily occurrence and this has been on my mind for a while because I don’t understand it.

Not to be old man screaming “when I was young,” but when I was young I remember being excused early so my teams could get to games on time. That was the fun part of being on an athletic team – if you had a long road trip, or a tough drive through a busy part of the state, the team got to leave school early to ensure they’d be on time.

Has this practice stopped? Because it’s absurd that schools don’t do this anymore.

While I prefer the 4:30-5:30 starts – golden hour light makes for delicious photos – all outdoor sports should be starting at 3:30. If that means kids have to hop on a bus before final bell, so be it. There’s no education lost in the final 30 minutes of the day – ask my 10-year old daughter, who leads the Foster/Glocester school district in her early dismissals for “cultural learning experiences.”

Let’s get back to this. Let the athletes out of school early and, who knows, maybe that will entice more students to play sports.

Advertisement

I’m hoping calling out coaches who didn’t report scores will entice more to avoid earning that social media scarlet letter. Division I has been terrific with getting scores in (minus a certain undefeated team at a school students don’t pay to attend), but getting results from Division II, III and IV has been like pulling teeth.

We can’t be at every game, but we can do daily writeups that appear online that give players a chance to see their name published somewhere on a regular basis. This is also how we figure out who are Player of the Week nominees are going to be.

The responsibility falls on the home team coaches and those who fail to report will continue to be pointed out. If a team wins on the road wants to report scores and stats so their players can earn accolades, we’re all for it.

Reporting scores and stats is easy. You can call us (401-277-7340) or email us (PJSports@ProvidenceJournal.com) with the following information – final score, three big performers from the winning team, one from the losing team and any other information that is pertinent to the game. That could be a game-winning hit, big inning, whatever.

Advertisement

Coaches who use GameChanger can also make this easy by directly emailing us the postgame report.

We need this information by 10 p.m.. Not 10:30 p.m. Not 6 a.m. the next morning. Not three days later, along with the other games you didn’t report. Most games are over by 7, the email takes all of four seconds to second. So let’s make it happen.

Now, after a wild week of softball, let’s get on to this week’s ranks.

Journal Softball Power Rankings – Division I

1. La Salle (9-0 Division I-B)

What is it going to take to beat the Rams? Good pitching, timely hitting and no mistakes – and even that might be enough. The Rams wrapped up the week with a win over undefeated Prout on Sunday, starting its toughest stretch of the season. This week’s games see La Salle hosting Cumberland and traveling to take on Cranston West, part of a two-week span that’s going to feel very much like the postseason.

Advertisement

2. Coventry (9-0 Division I-A)

Last week was a busy one for the Oakers, who got through four games with four wins – two thanks in part to the pitching of Sage Soares and two from the bats showing up huge. All eyes might be on next week’s matchup with La Salle, but Coventry has work to tend do this week at Moses Brown on Tuesday before hosting Pilgrim on Thursday. If the Oakers take care of business, then the fun can start.

3. Prout (7-1 Division I-B)

Sunday’s loss ended the Crusaders’ perfect season, but it hardly changed a thing. Prout made mistakes at the worst time on Sunday, which is something one can do against some teams but not against the defending champs. The Crusaders will learn and move on and with their talent, remain a title contender. Prout will look to start a new win streak Tuesday when it hosts Bay View before traveling to take on Cumberland Thursday.

4. Cumberland (6-2 Division I-A)

A sure sign we’re at midseason is the Clippers are starting to put things together and win games in bunches. Three games this week led to three wins, giving Cumberland four straight and an appearance in the top five. Can the Clippers do more? This week will be a tremendous test, as they travel to take on La Salle Tuesday and host Prout on Thursday.

5. Cranston West (6-2 Division I-B)

The Falcons started the week by bouncing back from their first loss of the season with a blowout win over Smithfield, but then something strange happened. The walk-off loss to winless East Providence raised more than a few eyebrows and while West grabbed a win over Moses Brown Friday, that loss to EP may loom large when it comes to seeding. The Falcons need to continue to build momentum Monday when they travel to play Pilgrim before welcoming La Salle to Brayton Ave. on Thursday.

Sauteing: East Greenwich (4-4 Division I)

Advertisement

Journal Softball Power Rankings – Division II

1. Ponaganset (6-0 Division II)

One loss was all it took to drop Johnston from No. 1 and give the Chieftains the top spot – on a by no less – one they might not relinquish for the rest of the season. Ponaganset hasn’t played since April 17, so there may be a question about rust. The Chieftains will answer those questions quickly with a game Monday at West Warwick before hosting Middletown on Wednesday.

2. Westerly (7-0 Division II)

The Bulldogs didn’t just win four games last week – they dominated, outscoring their opposition 51-5. Westerly has the arms, the offense is alive and the energy couldn’t be better. Now it’s time to get ready to go into overdrive and the Bulldogs will have two games to start the second half – at LNP on Monday and home against BNS on Wednesday.

3. Scituate (4-1 Division II)

After four straight wins to start the year, the Spartans were handed their first L by Westerly and will now have to show what kind of team they are and how they handle adversity. Scituate will start Monday against an angry Johnston team, then make a long road trip to South Kingstown Wednesday before ending the week at LNP on Thursday.

Advertisement

4. West Warwick (6-2 Division II)

While the Wizards had wins early, they didn’t have any against the top teams in D-II. That changed with last week’s win over Johnston, which should give West Warwick confidence that it can play with anyone in D-II. West Warwick will try to knock another team from the unbeaten ranks Monday when it hosts Ponaganset and its only other game this week is at Mt. Hope on Wednesday.

5. Johnston (4-1 Division II)

What happens next for the Panthers will define their season. Johnston dominated their first four games before falling to West Warwick, so this week is all about showing they can respond to the loss in a positive manner. It certainly won’t be easy, as the Panthers travel to take on Scituate Monday, followed by back-to-back home games against LNP Wednesday and Middletown Thusday.

Sauteing: LNP (3-2 Division II)

Journal Softball Power Rankings – Division III

1. Cranston East (7-0 Division III)

Friday’s win over Tiverton confirmed what should have already been known – the Thunderbolts are your favorites to win D-III. Cranston East is playing a different brand of softball than the rest of Division III and considering where it once was, it’s pretty impressive. The Thunderbolts can’t let success get to their head. They need to keep pushing and will, hosting defending D-III champ Mount St. Charles Monday and hosting Central Friday. The real game to watch might come Wednesday, when the Thunderbolts scrimmage Cranston West.

Advertisement

2. Tiverton (4-2 Division III)

After losing to Cranston East Friday, the Tigers should understand what they need to do if they want to win D-III – the defense needs to improve and the bats need more consistency. Tiverton will look to rebound from its loss with an interesting game Tuesday at home against Davies before traveling to play Exeter-West Greenwich Thursday.

3. Pawtucket (4-3 Division III)

Sholman threw everything at Cranston East Wednesday in a 2-0 loss, so it made sense why ace Janayah Gordon wasn’t out there in a 19-8 loss to Mount on Thursday. I’ll excuse the loss because with Gordon in the circle, Pawtucket is a title contender. Sholman will continue to work on shoring up its defense and search for help from the back of the order when it plays at Davies Monday with a rematch against MSC on Thursday.

4. Davies (4-3 Division III)

The Patriots are in a spot where they’ve beaten all the teams not on the list, but haven’t beaten anyone ranked higher than they are. If Davies wants to be a title contender, it needs to come up with a big win and getting one at home against Pawtucket Monday would certainly be that. If the Patriots could follow it with a win over Tiverton Tuesday, next week’s top four will look decidedly different.

Sauteing: Mount St. Charles (1-1 Division III)

Division IV Update

Central Falls still looking like the class of D-IV at 5-0, with Classical behind the Warriors at 4-0-1 after beating the Providence co-op last week. The Purple have three huge games this week, traveling to take on CF  on Monday, playing Providence on Wednesday before playing host to CF on Friday.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Rhode Island

Dr. Jerome Larkin is one step closer to leading R.I. Department of Health • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

Dr. Jerome Larkin is one step closer to leading R.I. Department of Health • Rhode Island Current


After a small clinic’s worth of physicians showed up to testify in support of Gov. Dan McKee’s choice for the next director of the Rhode Island Department of Health, the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services affirmed its support for Dr. Jerome “Jerry” Larkin at a hearing Thursday.

The committee voted 5-1 in favor of Larkin’s nomination, with Sen. Elaine Morgan, a Hopkinton Republican, serving the only nay vote. 

Greg Paré, spokesperson for the Rhode Island Senate, said in an email Thursday that Larkin’s appointment will hit the Senate floor on Tuesday, May 19.

The clinicians, many of them colleagues and former protégés of Larkin, came to say nice things about the doctor who serves as medical director of inpatient infectious diseases consultation services at Rhode Island Hospital and teaches clinical medicine as a professor at Brown University. The committee’s mailbox had also been stuffed with written testimonies.    

Advertisement

“We got many, many letters,” said Sen. Joshua Miller, who chairs the committee. “I don’t remember seeing a letter that was not in support.”

But the most memorable affirmation may have been from Dr. Sabina Holland, medical director of the pediatric HIV clinic at Hasbro Children’s Hospital. 

“The highest compliment that a pediatrician can give another pediatrician is to entrust them with the care of their children,” Holland said. “He could have my children.” 

The crowd laughed. Chair Miller offered a playful retort. 

“He can’t have my children,” Miller said.

Advertisement

Jokes aside, Larkin’s competency with children was underlined in several testimonies — including those from members of the Tiverton School Committee, which Larkin has chaired since 2017. Larkin has served on the school committee since 2012 and was most recently reelected in 2020 with 31.1% of the vote.   

The afternoon’s first two testimonies came from school committee members, including Deborah Pallasch.

“I have known Dr. Larkin since he became involved in the anarchy that can be Tiveron politics,” Pallasch said. “In the middle of COVID, as the chair of our school committee — as you can imagine, quite a scary time for us, quite a scary time for our parents, quite a scary time for our children — he led us as a community through that so deftly and so patiently and so respectfully.”

Larkin, in his own words to the Senate, emphasized the at-time martial nature of municipal school politics. “As chair for the last seven years, I am the veteran of 12 hardball budget seasons — some of them scorched earth, some of them merely trench warfare,” Larkin said. “I believe if you can understand the budget of a small-to-medium-sized school district, you have a better-than-even chance of understanding the budget of the Pentagon.”

“The Pentagon might actually be easier, as it seems to be able to spend money unbudgeted, freely, without any apparent consequence.”

Advertisement

Priorities include stabilizing hospitals and nursing homes

The consistency of Larkin’s school board role contrasts the revolving door at the health department, a fixture of the McKee administration. The last permanent director, Dr. Nicole Alexander-Scott, worked under Gina Raimondo’s administration and led the department during the height of the COVID pandemic. Alexander-Scott was reappointed for another five years in 2020, but vacated the position in January 2022, less than a year into McKee’s governorship. 

That vacuum has been plugged by three interim directors since then: Dr. Jim McDonald, Dr. Utpala Bandy, and most recently Dr. Staci Fischer, who took over as acting director when Bandy retired on March 31. Statewide health directors are rare birds nationally, and regional directors are common in larger states. The compensation for such an encompassing job has been criticized for the turnover, although McKee recently and successfully raised the base salary to $250,000 

Speaking to reporters, Larkin said that, if confirmed by the full Senate, his priorities would likely include the stabilization of hospitals and nursing homes, as well as responding to the opioid overdose crisis.

“But I’m still on the outside looking in,” Larkin said. 

Larkin was so far outside, in fact, that he was unsure how to assess the time demands of his possible new job. Would he continue serving on the school committee?

Advertisement

“I haven’t made a decision,” Larkin told a reporter. “Certainly, you know, the Department of Health is a full-time job but so is being a doctor.”

We got many, many letters. I don’t remember seeing a letter that was not in support.

– Sen. Joshua Miller, a Cranston Democrat who chairs the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services

Advertisement

Judging by the afternoon’s testimonies, Larkin is a good clinician. His 1993 medical degree is from Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, and his research specialty is tick-related illnesses and Lyme disease in children and pregnant women.

Dr. Michael Koster pointed out Larkin’s talents as a “med-peds” physician, or someone who “understands pediatric issues as much as he understands adult medical issues.”

“You don’t get a showing of physicians like this,” Koster said, referring to the turnout for the hearing. “You have to earn it. It’s not something you can buy.”

While the public offered no opposition, the senate committee did have a few questions. Miller pointed out the statute that outlines the health director’s qualifications — a prescription which includes “a minimum of five (5) years full time experience in health administration.” Miller was curious how that requirement fit into Larkin’s experience.

Advertisement

“I think it depends,” Larkin began. “So, if you look at how much time do I spend seeing patients — so, everything I do is subsumed under the title of the director of infectious disease consults service. So in many regards, my clinical work is an administrative responsibility. I have to know how those services work.”

Larkin estimated that administrative duties probably comprise half his time currently. 

Sen. Linda Ujifusa, a Portsmouth Democrat, asked Larkin about the state’s shortage of primary care doctors as well as reimbursement rates. Could any initiatives from the health department help shape a more positive environment for Rhode Island’s doctors?

Larkin replied that neighboring Massachusetts and Connecticut are well known to have superior reimbursement rates, but that “rectifying that ultimately is actually a federal issue.”

Dr. Jerome Larkin has served as chairman of the Tiverton School Committee for the past seven years. After a State House confirmation hearing on his nomination to be director of the Rhode Island Department of Health on Thursday, May 16, 2024, Larkin said he was still undecided if would continue to serve on the school committee or seek re-election if he was appointed. (Alexander Castro/Rhode island Current)

“Would you mask our kids again?”

Morgan asked Larkin about the state’s handling of the pandemic. Larkin suggested looking at a map, and that Rhode Island ultimately “dodged a bullet” given the severity of the pandemic in nearby Massachusetts and New York. 

Advertisement

Morgan then narrowed her focus. “Closing down the state: Would you do that again?” she asked.

“Do I think the decision was right to shut down in March of 2020 at that time? Yes,” Larkin said.  “Could we have reopened faster? Probably. There was certainly a loss in school districts, and there’s certainly an economic impact on this. So that’s my sort of armchair general retrospective perspective on it.”

“Would you mask our kids again?” Morgan continued.

“Yes. Yes,” Larkin said, and pointed to the measure as effective in reducing transmission, allowing kids to get back in school sooner.

At 4 p.m., bells started ringing.

Advertisement

“It’s not a fire alarm,” Sen. Pam Lauria said. “It’s just the bells for the Senate.”

Miller used the literal sounding of the alarm as a backdrop for one more comment.

“And with that bell from the Senate, I just would like to ask you to be aware of a couple of issues that we have discussed in committee this session,” Miller said, and pointed to recent discussions involving scope of practice. Should committees in the General Assembly be tasked with regulating scopes of practice, or should that be left entirely to medical boards and the health department?

But rather than discuss “going down a very slippery slope of having scope of practice legislated,” Miller filed the question away for another day, and the motion for a vote on Larkin’s advancement began. Sen. Alana DiMario seconded the motion. Only Morgan voted no.  

Larkin’s own words to the committee were punctuated with the occasional cough.

Advertisement

“Excuse my voice. My allergies decided to start today,” Larkin said after he sat down in front of the mic, following odes from his colleagues. “Yeah, I guess that was the easy part. It’s the fondest wish of every Irishman to attend their own wake, and I feel like that’s what I’ve been doing this afternoon.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Rhode Island & Connecticut's 704 MW Revolution Wind achieves first 'steel in the water'

Published

on

Rhode Island & Connecticut's 704 MW Revolution Wind achieves first 'steel in the water'


The 704-megawatt (M) Revolution Wind, Rhode Island and Connecticut’s first utility-scale offshore wind farm, just hit a major milestone.

Revolution Wind’s site is more than 15 miles south of Rhode Island and 32 miles southeast of Connecticut. The first multi-state offshore wind project is a 50/50 partnership between offshore wind giant Ørsted and New England energy provider Eversource.

“America’s offshore wind industry is scaling up, and the first steel in the water at Revolution Wind is a tremendous milestone for Rhode Island and Connecticut’s clean energy journey,” said David Hardy, group EVP and CEO Americas at Ørsted.

Advertisement

During the offshore construction phase, a variety of vessels will be active at the site, including construction and transport barges, cable installation vessels, tugboats, supply and support vessels, and protected species observer monitor vessels. Simultaneously, onshore construction is underway on Revolution Wind’s transmission system in North Kingstown, Rhode Island.

In New London, Connecticut, the first turbine components have started to arrive at State Pier, the project’s staging and marshaling port, where they will be assembled by local union labor.

In Rhode Island, crews in Providence are readying for loadout of advanced foundation components built by local union labor at Ørsted and Eversource’s construction hub at ProvPort. Revolution Wind’s crew helicopters and Rhode Island-built crew transfer vessels are based out of Quonset Point.

When it comes online in 2025, Revolution Wind will generate 400 MW of clean power for Rhode Island and 304 MW for Connecticut. Combined, that’s enough clean power for more than 350,000 homes across both states. It will displace nearly 1 million metric tons of carbon emissions annually, the equivalent of taking more than 200,000 cars off the road.

Last weekend, the US offshore wind supply chain marked another major milestone with the christening of the ECO EDISON, the first-ever American-built, owned, and crewed offshore wind service operations vessel. Constructed by over 600 workers across shipyards in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Florida, with components sourced from 34 states, the ECO EDISON will play a crucial role in operating and maintaining Ørsted and Eversource’s offshore wind projects in the Northeast, including Revolution Wind.

Rhode Island has set a goal of achieving 100% clean electricity by 2030, and Connecticut has set a goal of 100% clean electricity by 2040.

Advertisement

Read more: 2023 was a record year for wind power growth – in numbers


If you live in an area that has frequent natural disaster events, and are interested in making your home more resilient to power outages, consider going solar and adding a battery storage system. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –ad*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Bills to de-stigmatize language in state law on alcohol addiction progress in R.I. General Assembly • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

Bills to de-stigmatize language in state law on alcohol addiction progress in R.I. General Assembly • Rhode Island Current


What do you call someone who “who habitually lacks self-control as to the use of alcoholic beverages”? 

They’re an “alcoholic,” according to Rhode Island General Law.

But the state’s statutory language surrounding alcohol use and treatment could soon change thanks to the recent passage of bills in both chambers of the General Assembly. 

“We don’t talk that way anymore. We don’t think that way anymore. Yet it’s still codified into our statute,” said Rep. Jennifer Boylan, a Barrington Democrat, during a March 5 hearing of the House Committee on Health and Human Services. 

Advertisement

The bill she introduced that night, H7736, saw successful passage May 7 during a House floor vote. On Thursday, May 9, the Senate unanimously passed Bill S2087 by Sen. Joshua Miller, a Cranston Democrat. The twin bills allow revision of how state law defines alcohol disorders and their treatment. 

“These statutes have not been approached for revision in over 40 years,” Miller said on the Senate floor. “There are many flaws in it, including commitment to public hospitals where the actual commitment doesn’t exist, the beds do not exist. And the language is embarrassing to the departments and those involved as providers.”

Both bills direct the Rhode Island Department of Health and the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities (BHDDH) and Hospitals to coordinate proposed revisions that would align the state’s law books with best practices by Jan. 1, 2025.

Miller previously worked on the Governor’s Overdose Commission and has sponsored other bills relating to substance use in the past. This is Boylan’s first bill relating to substance use. 

“I challenge you to find someone who doesn’t know anyone who has this problem (alcohol use disorder),” Boylan said in a recent phone interview. “It’s a problem that a lot of people struggle with, and I think our statutes should be updated to be more modernized.” 

Advertisement

Person-first language

Many doctors and advocates consider terms like “alcoholic” stigmatizing and loaded. Both the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest using “person with alcohol use disorder” in keeping with a person-first approach to language use.

The notion of self-control as the main motivating factor in one’s drinking is contrary to clinical understanding, which sees alcohol use disorder as a more complex pattern. 

“Yes, there is an element of choice when a person first starts drinking. For some people, however, a mix of genetic and environmental factors facilitates a transition, often without full recognition, to increasingly heavier drinking,” according to a core resource document from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 

It’s a problem that a lot of people struggle with, and I think our statutes should be updated to be more modernized.

Advertisement

– Rep. Jennifer Boylan, a Barrington Democrat

Now the bills have to pass in opposite chambers, said Larry Berman, a House spokesperson, in an email: “In other words, the House now has to pass Sen. Miller’s bill and the Senate now has to pass Rep. Boylan’s bill. Once each bill passes in both chambers, they will be transmitted to the Governor.”

Boylan said on the phone that she’s “very hopeful” the bill will land on the governor’s desk this year. And on the Senate floor, Miller said the simultaneous OK is an improvement over previous years. In the 2023 legislative session, Miller’s bill secured Senate approval. But its momentum ended when it was referred to the House Committee on Health and Human Services.  

Advertisement

“I’ve had this bill for several years without any action on it on the House side,” Miller said. “The House passed it a few days ago, which will be a great relief to those involved in deciding in June what passes and doesn’t pass, [who] won’t have to hear from me about ‘Why didn’t this bill pass?’ Because it’s so simple and so important.”

The identical bills add only six sentences to existing statutes. Miller’s bill generated no discussion on the Senate floor. In the House, Minority Leader Mike Chippendale wondered if Boylan’s legislation would also change other instances of outdated language buried in state law.

“There are other sections in the law…where we use the term ‘habitual drunkard,’” Chippendale said. “I think obviously that sounds a little bit more offensive than ‘alcoholic.’” 

Laws on taverns, cookshops and oyster houses, for example, lump together “Drunkards, wastrels, and minors” as prohibited from entry into these businesses. Business owners face possible fines if they count among their customers “any common drunkard or person addicted to the intemperate use of spirituous or intoxicating liquors.” The section was first written in 1896 and most recently updated a century later in 1996. 

“Would this also change that or would that be something that we perhaps overlooked and will change later?” Chippendale asked Rep. Susan Donovan, who chairs the House Committee on Health and Human Services and presented Boylan’s bill.   

Advertisement

“I’d have to refer to counsel. I would hope that it would change all of those terms,” Donovan said.

Last year, Gov. Dan McKee signed into law legislation sponsored by Sen. Jonathan Acosta that replaced terms like “mentally retarded,” “alcoholic,” and “drug abuser” with less stigmatizing language. That legislation targeted different sections of state law, however. Boylan said her bill hones in on a very specific section of state law. 

Statutes that. include a definition for alcohol disorders and treatment have not been considered for revision in over 40 years. (Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)

Because circumstances can change

Beth Lamarre, executive director of the Rhode Island chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, wrote via email how stigmatizing words like “alcoholic” can hold “a negative connotation, because of how alcoholism/alcohol use disorder has been viewed throughout time.”

“It also spotlights the issue, as though it is that person’s only characteristic,” Lamarre said. “Describing someone as having an alcohol use disorder, on the other hand, describes a circumstance or a situation, one that can be changed.”  

Other states have also begun to read the fine print surrounding spirits. “It’s hard to say how many states have replaced their language entirely, but we have noticed more states using AUD (alcohol use disorder) in current legislation,” said Karmen Hanson, a senior fellow in the National Conference of State Legislatures’ health program, via email.

Advertisement

Legislatures where similar legislation has been introduced include Connecticut, Maryland, Colorado, Massachusetts, New Jersey and the Virgin Islands, but Hanson noted “that’s not a reflection of everything that may be out there.”

Global opinions differ on people-first language, although what words are used also owes much to the disability being described. England’s national health agency, for example, prefers “disabled people” to “people with a disability” — a choice underlined by an argument that society makes barriers for people with disabilities, rather than the disabilities themselves. This alternative, known as identity-first language, is also common among autistic and deaf people in the United States, according to the National Institutes of Health.

Regardless of what language one uses, disability advocates seem to agree that the overall idea is ensuring people feel comfortable speaking up about their struggles.

“Words matter, and how we talk about someone’s health (including and especially behavioral health) can make the difference in whether they feel supported in getting the treatment and help they need,” Lamarre said. 

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending