Connect with us

Northeast

NY ballot initiative could block parents from say in child's trans surgery, critics warn in fiery campaign

Published

on

NY ballot initiative could block parents from say in child's trans surgery, critics warn in fiery campaign

A New York ballot initiative, the Equal Rights Amendment, is facing fierce backlash over its vague language that critics say could prevent parents from having a say on whether their children undergo gender reassignment surgery. 

“Any decent lawyer will take one look at the Proposition One language and say, ‘you’ve got to be kidding me,” Greg Garvey, the executive director of the Coalition to Protect Kids – New York, a group “dedicated to defeating the so-called Equal Rights Amendment,” said in a press statement provided to Fox News Digital. 

“This ballot initiative is written so broadly and so poorly that it could cause irreparable harm to children and families. This is no soft-sounding equal rights amendment, it’s nothing less than The Parent Replacement Act.”

The New York Legislature passed the Equal Rights Amendment in January 2023, bringing the amendment to voters on the Nov. 5 ballot this year for ratification. Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul celebrated its passage last year, adding that New York would “combat discrimination” and “protect abortion access” following the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, which ended the recognition of a constitutional right to abortion. 

‘GENDER-AFFIRMING’ TREATMENTS DON’T BENEFIT YOUTH, SAYS PEDIATRICIANS GROUP: ‘IRREVERSIBLE CONSEQUENCES’

Advertisement

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks at the Dutch Broadway Elementary School in Elmont, New York, on May 9, 2023. (Howard Schnapp/Newsday RM via Getty Images)

“Here in New York, we will continue to take bold measures to protect the rights of New Yorkers, and I applaud the New York State Legislature for taking another crucial step toward enshrining the Equal Rights Amendment into the state constitution. Last year, I was proud to convene an Extraordinary Session of the legislature that led to first passage of this historic amendment, and I am grateful the amendment is on its way to being presented to voters next year,” Hochul said at the time. 

The proposal will reportedly codify abortion rights in the state constitution and add constitutional protections to its already existing protections regarding race and religion. 

The Coalition to Protect Kids – NY says an upcoming ballot proposal would ban parents from greenlighting their child’s transgender surgery. (Coalition to Protect Kids – NY)

DOCTOR DEFENDS GIVING TRANSGENDER TREATMENTS TO 8 AND 10-YEAR-OLDS: ‘RESPECT KIDS AS INDIVIDUALS’

Advertisement

Critics, however, say the proposal’s language is broad and would open the door to parents being kept in the dark over their child’s medical procedures, including gender reassignment surgery. 

Demonstrators display a “Protect Trans Rights” flag during a protest. (Andrea Ronchini/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

“Whether through Albany sloppiness — or pernicious ideological intent — Proposition One would strip the legal rights of parents with school-age children to know about crucially important things happening with their kids, including controversial gender transformation procedures,” the Coalition to Protect Kids said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

TRANS CHILDREN WHO TOOK PUBERTY-BLOCKING DRUGS HAD MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, UK STUDY FOUND

The ballot proposal will ask New York voters this November if they support adding language to the state constitution strengthening that people cannot be denied rights based on their “ethnicity, national origin, age, and disability” or sex, which includes “sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and reproductive healthcare and autonomy.”

Advertisement

“​​If entities cannot ‘discriminate’ based on age or gender identity or expression, under the new amendment language, medical providers could be required to facilitate a child’s request to make permanent, life-altering ‘gender-affirming’ decisions, and they would not need to consult with parents,” the coalition continued. 

EXPOSING THE TRANS AGENDA AIMED AT OUR KIDS: FAITH LEADER REVEALS HOW PARENTS CAN KEEP CHILDREN SAFE

The New York Capitol building is seen, June 30, 2023, in Albany, New York. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File)

The group also said the proposal would require schools to allow biological males to compete on girls’ sports teams, while laws dictating the age New Yorkers can purchase alcohol or marijuana, or determine elder abuse and statutory rape could be “weakened because they ‘discriminate’ based on age.”

“Proponents of the amendment say they are interested in protecting abortion rights,” Garvey continued. “But abortion was legislatively adopted in New York State in 1970 and everyone knows there is no risk of its repeal or limitation. Advocates of the amendment aren’t being truthful to voters when they contend this right is at risk in New York.” 

Advertisement

GENDER DYSPHORIA GROWING AMONG YOUNGER ADULTS AMID ‘INCREASING ACCEPTANCE,’ STUDY FINDS

“The proposed amendment opens the floodgates for government wielding more authority over children than parents on some of the most important decisions of their lives,” Garvey said. “The politicians in Albany have some explaining to do.”

New Yorkers for Equal Rights, which supports the proposal, argued that the proposal would better protect New Yorkers’ rights while serving as an example for other states to follow. 

A social media post on an upcoming ballot initiative in New York published by the Coalition to Protect Kids – NY. (Coalition to Protect Kids – NY)

“If passed, the NY ERA would provide the most comprehensive list of protected categories of any state in the country — safeguarding New Yorkers’ rights, as well as serving as a model for other states,” the group said in a statement last week, according to the New York Post. 

Advertisement

The group denied that the proposal would curb parent’s say in their children’s medical care. 

“These claims simply aren’t true. This amendment is about making sure our fundamental rights and reproductive freedoms are protected and never at risk of becoming a political football,” said Sasha Ahuja, campaign director of New Yorkers for Equal Rights.

Fox News Digital reached out to Hochul’s office for comment, but did not receive a reply.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Northeast

Judge reveals earliest potential start times for Luigi Mangione’s federal murder trial

Published

on

Judge reveals earliest potential start times for Luigi Mangione’s federal murder trial

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Luigi Mangione returned to court Friday in a bid to have the most serious charges he faces thrown out of his federal case — as supporters gathered outside of the courthouse for a hearing that could determine whether the potential death penalty remains in play.

The motion to drop two of the four federal charges against Mangione, including the most serious, murder through use of a firearm, would eliminate the potential death penalty if granted.

While the judge did not issue a ruling after attorneys presented arguments on both sides of the issue, she did set a tentative timeline for Mangione’s federal trial. No definitive date was set, however.

Judge Margaret Garnett said jury selection could begin in the week of Sept. 8. If it’s a capital case, opening statements would likely be in January 2027. If she grants the defense motion and removes capital charges, opening statements would begin in October.

Advertisement

POLICE SERGEANT DENIES HEARING LUIGI MANGIONE MOTHER’S ALLEGED DAMNING STATEMENT ABOUT CEO KILLING

Luigi Mangione appears in Manhattan Supreme Court for a suppression hearing as both sides prepare to wrap up arguments on Dec. 18, 2025. (Curtis Means for Daily Mail via Pool)

Earlier this week, federal public defender Paresh Patel joined Mangione’s legal team as a special counsel for the Friday hearing. Patel is a Maryland-based appellate attorney and made the defense’s arguments against the charges in court.

Patel argued that the federal stalking charges against Mangione don’t meet the requirements to justify the more serious charge of murder through use of a firearm because stalking, on its own, isn’t a violent crime. 

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jun Xiang, giving oral arguments on behalf of the prosecution, countered that the victim’s death is an appropriate element to justify the charge.

Advertisement

An electronic advertising truck in support of Luigi Mangione drives past Federal Court where a suppression hearing is underway, Friday, January 9, 2026. (Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)

UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot in the back multiple times, on video, by a man prosecutors allege is Mangione.

In one example given by Xiang, he described a gang hit on a house, in which a member tossed a grenade in to kill one person. Additional victims inside died. He argued that the defendant needs to know that his conduct places the victim in fear of reasonable bodily injury.

When the hearing wrapped up around 1:30 p.m., the judge said she would issue a ruling later.

She told the parties to aim for jury selection at the beginning of September, with the trial starting later that fall or early winter, with a January start at the latest.

Advertisement

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

An electronic advertising truck in support of Luigi Mangione drives past Federal Court where a suppression hearing is underway, Friday, January 9, 2026. (Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)

Separately, federal prosecutors have rejected “meritless” arguments from accused assassin and former Ivy Leaguer Mangione’s legal team claiming Attorney General Pam Bondi has a conflict of interest and should have recused herself due to prior ties to a lobbying firm, ahead of a key hearing in his federal case.

The defense, in previous filings, has accused Bondi of “prejudice” against the defendant and claimed that her former position as a partner at Ballard Partners, a lobbying firm with ties to UnitedHealthcare, should lead to her recusal.

WATCH: Luigi Mangione supporters arrive before key hearing in assassination case

“When Ms. Bondi left Ballard Partners to become the Attorney General in 2025, the very first defendant she personally selected to be executed was the man accused of killing the CEO of her former client,” defense attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo wrote in a December filing.

Advertisement

Prosecutors, however, called her claims “incomplete and misleading.”

Luigi Mangione supporters outside Federal Court in Manhattan, N.Y., January 9, 2026 where a suppression hearing is underway. (Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)

Bondi no longer works there, they wrote, is not being paid by the firm or its clients and was not influenced by any “corporate interests” when the DOJ decided to seek the death penalty against Mangione if he is convicted.

Although his lawyers have dropped their motion to suppress statements he made to police before and after his arrest at a Pennsylvania McDonald’s, the defense is still hoping to suppress damning evidence recovered from Mangione’s backpack without a search warrant.

Luigi Mangione supporters outside Federal Court in Manhattan, N.Y., January 9, 2026 where a suppression hearing is underway. Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital (Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)

Advertisement

SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER

Federal prosecutors have countered that the suspected murder weapon and allegedly incriminating journals inside would have inevitably been discovered later — even if Altoona police hadn’t searched it at the scene.

The judge said she did not see the need for an evidentiary hearing that the defense requested on the matter.

UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson is pictured in an undated portrait provided by UnitedHealth. The executive was shot from behind and killed on his way to an investor conference in New York City in what prosecutors have described as a politically motivated assassination. (AP Photo/UnitedHealth Group via AP)

SEND US A TIP HERE

Advertisement

Federal prosecutors had opposed the idea of holding one.

Legal experts have said police do not typically need one when they search a bag as part of the arrest process, and prosecutors said everything in the bag would have been inevitably obtained later when they obtained their search warrants.

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? FIND MORE ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB

A member of the NYPD Crime Scene Unit takes a picture of a shell casing found at the scene where UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot and killed in Midtown Manhattan in New York City on Dec. 4, 2024. (REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton)

Luigi Mangione pictured in a Pennsylvania booking photo. (Pennsylvania Department of Corrections)

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Surveillance video shows a man approach the 50-year-old Thompson from behind and gun him down outside a Manhattan hotel that was supposed to host a shareholder conference later that morning.

The Minnesota resident was a married father of two.

Fox News’ Brendan McDonald contributed to this report.



Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Red Sox shed light on plans for outfield, including Ceddanne Rafaela’s role

Published

on

Red Sox shed light on plans for outfield, including Ceddanne Rafaela’s role


Last year the Red Sox had a unique and enviable problem, which was that at full strength the club had more starting-caliber outfielders than it had available lineup spots.

Injuries kept that from being an issue most of the season, but for some stretches the only way the club could accommodate everyone was by playing Gold Glove center fielder Ceddanne Rafaela at second base.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pittsburg, PA

Masontown Borough unanimously votes to reinstate police department

Published

on

Masontown Borough unanimously votes to reinstate police department


During an emergency meeting on Saturday night, Masontown borough council voted 6-0 to reinstate its police department after council initially voted on Monday to lay off the entire department, citing budgetary reasons as the leading factor for the decision.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending