Education
Opinion | Yale Has Come Up With a Surefire Way to Make a Terrible Situation Worse
Yale University’s report on how to restore public confidence in America’s colleges and universities is full of smart and sensible recommendations. That’s not surprising when one sees the smart and sensible faculty who wrote it, led by the scholars Beverly Gage and Julia Adams. Among the suggestions: Reinforce the academic core of the university; don’t allow classes to be dominated by open laptops or other devices; do more to ensure that people do not self-censor; respect the ideals of free speech and academic freedom; “be human.” Although the committee doesn’t go so far as to say that nepotism in admissions should be eliminated (it asks only that it be reduced), it does suggest that Yale try to make its educational offerings free for a larger percentage of the population. Who would disagree?
It’s the recommendation to shrink the mission of the university that caught my eye. The committee claims that in 2016, “departing from its traditional emphasis on the creation and dissemination of knowledge, Yale expanded its mission statement to include ‘improving the world today,’ educating ‘aspiring leaders worldwide,’ and fostering ‘an ethical, interdependent and diverse community.’”
That is incorrect. It is true that Yale shifted its mission statement a bit in 2016, but the underlying ideal of cultivating people who would, as the language now says, “lead and serve in every sphere of human activity” had long been among the university’s goals. In fact, that cultivation has long been among the goals of many universities in the United States, adopted as these institutions sought secular replacements for their founding denominational creeds. Leaders of colleges and universities thought they had a duty to defend the freedoms that allowed higher education to thrive. My own school’s founding documents, written in 1831, spoke of furthering the “good of the individual educated and the good of the world.” We still cite that today when we speak of our mission to produce graduates who will use their educations to make a positive difference.
This is what the Yale committee wants to trim. “These are all worthy goals. But they are not what makes a university a university,” its authors opine. “At a moment when higher education is being buffeted from all sides, it is imperative to understand what we are here for and what universities do best. That requires clarity, not diffusion, of purpose.”
Amid the Trump administration’s ongoing attack on higher education, the message is clear: Don’t worry, it says, we are staying in our narrow lane. That’s not a mission; it’s a defense strategy. And the retreat from public purpose will not enhance trust; it will further erode it. A lack of public engagement and an air of cloistered privilege are a big part of why so many people now view universities with suspicion. Retreating further behind the gates will make a bad situation much worse.
Not all American colleges are viewed with distrust — community colleges, for example, still enjoy high levels of confidence, as do regional public institutions. The problem is with the attention-grabbing elite institutions. As the Yale report notes, they are far from blameless.
These institutions too often seem to offer lessons in condescension. Their faculty and students can appear to be better at moral posturing than at listening effectively to those with whom they disagree. Their campus cultures can breed premature and intolerant consensus, causing people to censor themselves for fear of being called out as having the wrong ideals. The need for more intellectual diversity in higher education is clear, except to those who believe that their exclusive club possesses a purity that other members of our society haven’t yet attained.
Most Americans understand that these elite schools give many wealthy people more opportunities to become even wealthier. They understand that the most popular career choices for Ivy League graduates tend to be consulting and finance and tech. Trust in finance is even lower than it is in higher education. Why should people trust the sector’s feeder schools? And why should they trust their admissions policies, with their opaque pricing structures and their pride in exclusivity?
Yale is one of the very few, very wealthy institutions that can admit applicants regardless of their ability to pay. Starting this fall, the university will charge no tuition at all to students whose families fall outside the richest 10 percent of the population. That’s an impressive step, one I wish my own institution could take. But the whole competitive admissions system at Yale and most other highly selective institutions — including my own — still favors applicants whose families could afford to expose them to private high schools, private tutoring and expensive résumé-expanding extracurricular activities, and who weren’t obligated to balance their calculus homework with the demands of an after-school job. As the committee notes, Yale admits fewer than 5 percent of its applicants. Unspoken is that probably three-quarters of them are qualified to attend and even get A’s, the average grade at the university.
The Yale committee calls for relying more on objective admissions standards such as standardized tests. The problem there is that those tests are anything but objective; the more colleges rely on them, the more the uncredited work of expensive tutors or test prep classes can distort the profile of the incoming class.
Expanding opportunities for affordable, high-quality academic experiences can make things better. That’s why recruiting a diverse class of students, with talented young people from areas of the country often underrepresented on elite campuses, is so important. The Trump administration’s war on D.E.I. makes this dangerous work, and so we should celebrate programs that bring college-level classes to underserved communities, such as those sponsored by Bard College and by the National Education Opportunity Network.
This cautious committee does call on the university to do more public programming, opening its gates even further to the communities around it. It also joins the national chorus for more programs in “dialogue across difference,” and I think it should be applauded for advocating civics instruction for all undergraduates. But these are small steps.
One can well imagine why a university committee might want to avoid provoking the ire of the Trump administration, which has hit higher education with more than a billion dollars of fines and has threatened schools whose campuses don’t seem to line up with its priorities.
But the ideals the Trump administration has been punishing are prerequisites for higher education to flourish — independent thought, a commitment to truth even when it’s inconvenient and a focus on the creation of truly democratic citizens. Endangering these ideals endangers the whole operation. Yale and other elite universities should find the courage to say so.
Education
Video: How We Tested Dog Leashes
new video loaded: How We Tested Dog Leashes
May 13, 2026
Is Stretch Denim Good, Actually?
0:59
Packing Cube Tips to Maximize Space
0:33
Trader Joe’s vs. Fancy French Butter
1:01
Kerrygold vs. Walmart Butter
0:54
Are Robot Vacuums Disappearing?
0:50
Goodbye, Passwords. Welcome, Passkeys.
0:53
Today’s Videos
U.S.
Politics
Immigration
NY Region
Science
Business
Culture
Books
Wellness
World
Africa
Americas
Asia
South Asia
Donald Trump
Middle East Crisis
Russia-Ukraine Crisis
Visual Investigations
Opinion Video
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Education
Italian City, Unused to Celebrity Visits, Welcomes Princess of Wales
Italians have little interest in restoring their monarchy, abolished in the 1940s for its support of Mussolini.
But on Wednesday, hundreds of excited residents took to a square in the northern city of Reggio Emilia to loudly cheer the arrival of Catherine, Princess of Wales, on her first official overseas engagement since her battle with cancer was revealed in 2024.
People waved Italian flags and Union Jacks when Catherine arrived in front of City Hall, where she greeted the mayor along with dozens of fidgety preschoolers who were the reason for her trip to this city. For decades, Reggio Emilia has enjoyed international renown for an educational philosophy that focuses on children’s relationships, their enthusiasm and their play.
Catherine has long made early childhood learning the focus of her philanthropic efforts, founding the Royal Foundation Center for Early Childhood in 2021. Her trip to Reggio Emilia was billed by Kensington Palace as a chance for the princess to explore innovative international approaches to nurturing young children.
Outside City Hall, Catherine paused to speak to some of the youngsters, high-fived a little boy, posed for selfies, and waved and smiled to the crowd.
For British royal watchers, the visit signals that Catherine, 44, is ready to more fully return to business as usual more than a year after announcing her cancer was in remission. She did public events last year in Britain, presenting awards, attending functions and watching tennis at Wimbledon. But the trip to Reggio Emilia — with visits to two schools as well as the center where the teaching approach was developed — marks a new level of engagement.
“It’s the first time she’s out officially,” said Richard Fitzwilliams, a British royal commentator. “And she’s obviously grown in strength.”
For Reggio Emilia, the visit was a chance to show off its schools, and itself, basking in a limelight usually reserved for the more famous neighboring cities of Parma and Modena. “It’s the younger brother syndrome,” said Domenico Martino, who works at the city’s tourist office.
Although the city’s innovative schools have long been a draw for tens of thousands of educators, city officials say, celebrity visits are rare.
Reggio Emilia’s educational approach took root after World War II, when local women used the proceeds from the sale of a tank, six horses and some trucks to build a preschool. A network of municipal infant-toddler centers and preschools followed, inspired by Loris Malaguzzi, an education expert intent on making them places of experimentation and innovation.
“The best way to understand Reggio Emilia is to go into the schools,” said Federico Ruozzi, who is in charge of the city’s infant-toddler center and preschool system. “Everyone considers it part of the city’s heritage, and so the families, the administrators, and the children who attended school back then defend it,” he said.
A delegation from Catherine’s foundation quietly visited the city about six weeks ago, taking one of the many courses offered each year by Reggio Children, the organization that promotes the educational approach.
For city officials, that meant a crash course in royal etiquette, including addressing Catherine as Your Royal Highness, said Marwa Mahmoud, the city’s councilor for education.
On Wednesday afternoon, Catherine visited the Scuola Comunale d’Infanzia Anna Frank, a municipal preschool for 3- to 6-year-olds, where she observed an “atelier,” a creative moment for self-expression that is central to the approach. In this case, children interpreted the forms that winds take using different materials and colors, and brainstormed words that clouds bring to mind. Catherine added her own: “Dream,” said Annalisa Rabotti, an education expert who works for the city. “She was very curious and interested and empathetic,” she added.
What is the Reggio Emilia approach?
The so-called Reggio Emilia Approach is an educational philosophy that believes in the potential of young children, from infants to preschoolers, to be creative, learn and thrive in a nurturing environment that involves their families and communities.
The approach became well-known in educational circles after Newsweek featured one of the city’s schools in a 1991 cover piece about the 10 best schools in the world, according to Ms. Mahmoud.
The city’s commitment to the program — it allocates 13 percent of its budget to preschool services, Ms. Mahmoud said — also contributes to its success.
“We’ve always maintained that education — as well as health and health care — should not be viewed as costs. It is right to evaluate them in terms of efficiency and waste reduction, but they are not costs — they are investments in the present and the future,” said Marco Massari, the mayor of Reggio Emilia.
Each school day begins with what Mr. Malaguzzi called “the children’s parliament,” a moment when children are encouraged to speak and listen, and the day’s activities are decided.
The children work in small groups, learning together, “so there are no me and others, but a continuous interaction between the me and the others to build a we,” said Maddalena Tedeschi, president of Reggio Children. They also cook together in in-house kitchens.
Catherine is expected to remain in the city for another day and is expected to visit another school.
Education
‘No Essay’ College Scholarships May Have Unseen Strings Attached
Looking for a college scholarship and finding sites offering easy, “no essay” applications? Beware. Applicants may not realize that they are trading their personal information for what is essentially a raffle ticket.
Unlike traditional scholarships, no-essay prizes often aren’t based on a student’s academic record or other accomplishments. Rather, they are awarded by random drawings, with the odds of winning dependent on how many students apply. The private student lender Sallie Mae, for instance, offers monthly no-essay scholarships of $2,000 through its Scholly search site. The official rules describe the process as a “sweepstakes.”
The same language appears in the rules for no-essay scholarships on other scholarship matching sites, including ScholarshipOwl — which is upfront in estimating, for those who click through to online rules, that the odds of winning are about one in 140,000.
Why offer drawings for scholarships? Online applications can serve as “lead generators” for products like private student loans, said Mark Kantrowitz, a financial-aid expert who years ago helped develop early scholarship-search and financial-aid websites.
Essay-free scholarships do pay out awards. The websites are replete with pictures of happy winners. Jackie Bright, chief executive of the National Scholarship Providers Association, said in an email that “low burden” applications could reduce barriers for students who might not have extra time or writing support at home.
But their potential value to the sites is that applicants provide personal details that the sites may sell — “monetize,” in digital lingo — not just to obvious buyers like colleges and scholarship providers, but also to businesses that want to advertise products and services to students and their families.
“The idea of getting a scholarship is a very tempting reason to provide your personal information,” said R.J. Cross, who directs the “Don’t Sell My Data” campaign for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.
How has scholarship marketing changed?
Student data has long provided grist for colleges and outside scholarships — those offering awards that don’t come directly from colleges and universities — that want to find interested students. Anyone who has taken the SAT knows that college brochures are sure to appear in the mailbox. But marketing has become more sophisticated in the digital age.
“It’s a really clear example of a power asymmetry between individuals and big data companies,” said Caitriona Fitzgerald, deputy director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a Washington research group that aims to protect privacy.
Applicants and their families may not realize just how widely the information they provide to scholarship search sites may be shared or how long it is retained, privacy experts say. As technology advances, the data may be redeployed in ways that weren’t foreseen when it was collected, Ms. Cross said.
ScholarshipOwl’s privacy policy says the site may sell users’ personal information to “other parties.” But David Tabachnikov, the site’s chief executive, said it didn’t sell data to third parties because it earned revenue from user subscription fees. The site’s basic services are free, but users can pay — typically $15 a month — to see more detailed information about scholarships.
Ms. Fitzgerald said it was possible that some sites didn’t currently sell personal data but might do so in the future.
Worries about the use of student data surfaced in a lawsuit that Christopher Gray, who as a college student co-founded Scholly, filed against Sallie Mae last month in Delaware Superior Court.
In July 2023, Sallie Mae said it had acquired the “key assets” of Scholly, which is now part of the company’s SLM Education Services unit. Mr. Gray joined Sallie Mae as an executive but was fired in October 2024 — after, he said in his complaint, he raised privacy objections about the company’s plans to sell information provided to Scholly by students, many of them under 18, to third parties. He said the company had “intentionally” concealed such plans from him.
The suit said Mr. Gray had been wrongfully fired and seeks damages including pay and benefits. The lawsuit was reported earlier by TechCrunch, which covers technology start-ups.
In an interview, Mr. Gray said he was disturbed that the data might be misused to pitch “predatory” credit cards or loans. “It makes me very angry,” he said. “These are students who are very vulnerable.”
Sallie Mae is seeking to dismiss the suit, saying in a brief filed on May 1 that Mr. Gray was fired because he was spending too much time on a new start-up. The brief also said he was spreading “misleading and baseless accusations” as part of a strategy to “improperly use media pressure to extract a monetary settlement.”
Sallie Mae added that it was “fully compliant with all applicable privacy laws and regulations.”
Richard Castellano, a Sallie Mae spokesman, said in an email that Education Services tried selling limited student data as part of a pilot last year but discontinued the strategy in mid-2025. “We are not selling personal information to third parties today and have no intention to do so,” he said.
Still, the privacy policy that applies to Education Services lists a wide swath of personal information that the company may collect, starting with basic items like your name and email and mailing address. But it may also include things like your date of birth and more sensitive information, like your Social Security number, driver’s license number, race, ethnicity and sexual orientation.
The site may potentially share this personal information, the policy says, with partners and business customers, including those “that want to market to you,” and may enter into agreements with third parties to “sell or license information to them for their own purposes.”
Sallie Mae — which has begun calling its overall business Sallie — recently created its own advertising arm, Backpack Media, which helps translate consumer data into targeted ads. The unit has hired digital advertising specialists and said its “proprietary education and audience insights” could help companies reach students at key moments, such graduating from high school, choosing a college and starting a first job. “We know who students and recent grads are, where they’re headed and what they’ll need next,” the website says.
Backpack Media does not sell individuals’ data, and its partners do not get access to any personal information, Mr. Castellano said.
Can I check how a site uses my information?
Take time to read a scholarship site’s privacy policy, experts say. Search for words like “collect,” “sell,” “share” and “disclose.”
Such tedious, site-by-site research wouldn’t be necessary if the United States had a national, comprehensive digital privacy policy, Ms. Fitzgerald said. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, from 1998, applies only to children under 13. States are starting to pass their own privacy laws, she said, but protections vary.
If what you learn on a site makes you uncomfortable, see if it offers a way to opt out of having certain information shared or sold. If you can’t opt out, try another site with policies that limit the sale of information.
In general, it’s best to limit sharing your information, Ms. Cross said. The more widely it is spread, the more vulnerable it is to being compromised.
What other steps can I take?
Creating a separate email account specifically for scholarship search sites can help. That way, if your information is shared or sold, promotions or pitches will go to that email rather than clogging your main email account.
-
World22 seconds agoCanada confirms hantavirus case linked to cruise ship outbreak that has killed three passengers
-
Politics6 minutes agoTrump reads Bible as thousands pack National Mall for America 250 prayer rally
-
Health12 minutes agoFrequent museum visits tied to reduced cellular aging, research finds
-
Sports18 minutes agoIndy 500: Counting Down The 10 Best Finishes In Race History
-
Technology24 minutes agoYour 401(k) is the new identity theft target
-
Business30 minutes agoWhy this Hollywood director thinks AI can save L.A. film jobs
-
Entertainment36 minutes agoPedro Pascal goes undercover for ‘Star Wars’ surprise at Disneyland
-
Lifestyle42 minutes agoHow Route 66 inspired Disney’s ‘Cars’ and Cars Land — and the ride that never came to be