Technology
Anthropic’s Mythos AI found over 2,000 unknown software vulnerabilities in just seven weeks of testing
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
There is a new AI model called Mythos. Anthropic built it for defensive cybersecurity research. It is so effective at finding software vulnerabilities that Anthropic decided the general public cannot have it.
Instead, it is letting a small circle of trusted partners like Microsoft and Google experiment with it first under controlled conditions, while researchers figure out what guardrails need to exist.
That decision alone should tell you something. When the company that built a tool decides the world is not ready for it, you pay attention. And when you understand what Mythos actually did during testing, that caution starts to make complete sense.
WINDOWS PCS AT RISK AS NEW TOOL DISARMS BUILT-IN SECURITY
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com — trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Anthropic’s Mythos AI uncovered more than 2,000 unknown software vulnerabilities in just seven weeks, showing how fast AI can now expose hidden weaknesses. (Gabby Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
How Anthropic’s Mythos AI found 2,000 vulnerabilities in seven weeks
Seven weeks. One AI model. One team. More than 2,000 previously unknown software vulnerabilities were found. If you need a moment with that, take it. John Ackerly, CEO and co-founder of Virtru, a data security company, put that figure into perspective in a way that is hard to shake.
“Mythos is absolutely a turning point for cybersecurity. Think about it. Mythos didn’t pick a lock; it found thousands of locks that were never locked in the first place (that no one even knew existed) in software that the best human security researchers had studied for decades.
The math is staggering. One AI model, and one team, in seven weeks, found more than 2,000 zero-day vulnerabilities. That is 30% of the world’s entire annual output prior to AI. When thousands of researchers get access to AI models like Mythos, a single year will surface exponentially more zero-days than the 360,000 recorded in all of software history.
Mythos and other AI models like it can now find and exploit software flaws at a speed and scale that is beyond containment. This means that the old approach of building stronger walls around systems and hoping they hold is becoming much less reliable. It also means that the manual “find a vulnerability, patch the vulnerability” process is not going to keep pace with a threat landscape bolstered by the speed and scale of AI.
The threat surface is now expanding faster than any wall can contain it. The only answer to this new dynamic is to protect the data itself, rather than prop up perimeter protection around it.
Thirty percent of the world’s annual output in seven weeks changes the game entirely.
What makes Mythos AI different from other AI security tools
Cybersecurity teams have used AI tools for years. So, what makes this different?
Ackerly explains it this way: “What makes this different is the level of autonomy and speed it enables. Mythos is being described as a system that can discover vulnerabilities and even generate working exploits much faster than traditional human-led workflows. This model could make it easy for a bad actor to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in software, even if that bad actor isn’t knowledgeable or trained.”
That last part matters most. Before a tool like this, exploiting a serious software vulnerability required real technical skill. Mythos AI lowers that barrier significantly. A person with bad intentions and no technical background could potentially use a model like this to cause serious damage. The expertise gap that once offered some natural protection is closing.
FAKE PAYPAL EMAIL LET HACKERS ACCESS COMPUTER AND BANK ACCOUNT
Security experts warn that tools like Mythos could shrink the time it takes to find and exploit flaws from weeks down to minutes. (Patrick Sison/AP Photo)
Why Anthropic’s Mythos AI is breaking down perimeter security
Most cybersecurity spending, the overwhelming majority of it, goes toward what experts call perimeter defense. Think firewalls, network monitoring, endpoint security and intrusion detection. The entire strategy is built on one core idea of keeping the bad actors out, and the data inside stays safe.
Ackerly describes how that model is now breaking down.
“The perimeter is the digital wall around your systems and the information you possess. For decades, cyber strategies have primarily focused on the idea that if you protected the perimeter well enough — if you built a strong enough wall — the sensitive data on the inside would stay safe,” Ackerly said.
“The industry has poured hundreds of billions of dollars into firewalls, endpoint detection, network security, application security and other perimeter defenses. Traditional security architecture by itself cannot keep pace in this new world.
“The Mythos development from Anthropic is making a hard truth very apparent: Time is running out for companies to prepare for this new reality. Shifting focus from ‘protecting the perimeter’ to ‘protecting the data’ is critically important to mitigate data loss or compromise.”
Hundreds of billions of dollars. And now the model those dollars were built on is becoming unreliable. It forces a full rethink.
Does Anthropic’s Mythos AI give attackers the advantage?
This is the question everyone wants a straight answer to. Ackerly offers one that is more nuanced than a simple yes or no.
“I wouldn’t frame it as attackers automatically having an advantage. But, over time, it does mean that ‘bad guys’ and ‘good guys’ will have access to essentially the same tools. As a result, I do think defenders absolutely need a different strategy. If you assume the outer wall may fail, then the smarter move is to protect the data itself so it stays controlled even after a breach.”
The playing field is leveling. And that may sound fair until you remember attackers only need to succeed once, while defenders have to succeed every time.
How fast is Mythos AI changing the cybersecurity threat landscape?
Speed is what makes Mythos AI genuinely alarming. Traditional cyberattacks move through a lifecycle. Reconnaissance takes time. Finding the right vulnerability takes more time. Building an exploit takes more time on top of that.
Ackerly explains what happens when AI compresses all of that.
“AI is accelerating the threat. A model that can find and exploit vulnerabilities autonomously compresses the attack lifecycle from weeks to hours, or even minutes. Every layer of the traditional security stack now has to operate at machine speed. Manual security architectures cannot keep up.
“But AI also makes data-centric security more powerful, not less so. When every piece of sensitive data is protected at the object-level, AI agents can enforce governance at scale by checking entitlements, applying attribute-based access controls, and auditing data flows in real time. The same capabilities that make Mythos a dangerous tool in the hands of ‘bad guys’ make it a valuable tool in the hands of ‘good guys.’”
The question organizations should be asking shifts from “how do I build higher walls?” to “when the walls fail, is my data still protected?” That is the question worth sitting with.
What Mythos AI means for regular people’s personal data
Most of the Mythos coverage has focused on corporate risk. But your bank account and medical records sit in those same vulnerable systems.
“For everyday people, the first change is that breaches and scams could become more frequent, more targeted, and harder to spot. If AI makes it easier to uncover weak points in the systems we all rely on, that can translate into more pressure on the services that hold our personal data, from email and cloud storage to health, banking, and retail platforms.
Consumers shouldn’t assume a company is doing the right thing with their data. Now, they really can’t assume a company’s outer defenses are enough to protect their information.
This also highlights the importance of basic cyber hygiene like unique passwords and MFA, so that when breaches happen, the scope of impact on your own personal data is contained.”
Your bank account, your medical records, your tax documents, your private messages. All of it already lives across dozens of platforms you trust to protect it. If those platforms’ outer defenses are no longer reliable, what exactly is standing between your data and someone who wants it?
Ackerly goes further on where the exposure actually lives. “Data now travels across clouds, devices, partners, and borders. The risk isn’t just one hacked server in one building anymore. It’s all the places your data passes through or gets copied to along the way.
Was Anthropic right to keep Mythos AI restricted?
Anthropic made a choice that is rare in the AI industry. They built something powerful and then decided not to release it widely.
On that decision, Ackerly is direct. “Anthropic’s decision to withhold Mythos from general release is unprecedented and, frankly, responsible. Time will tell what these partners are able to do with regard to safety, but releasing it to the general public would certainly have been ill-advised and dangerous.”
Unprecedented. That word deserves weight here. In an industry that races to release new tech, Anthropic stopped. That speaks volumes.
We reached out to Anthropic for a comment, but did not hear back before our deadline.
THIRD-PARTY BREACH EXPOSES CHATGPT ACCOUNT DETAILS
As AI accelerates cyberattacks, the focus is shifting from protecting networks to protecting the data itself. (Kury “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
How to stay safe as cybersecurity shifts
The perimeter model is deteriorating, but that does not mean you are helpless. Individual behavior still matters, and it matters more now than it did before.
Ackerly’s recommendation is this: “Stop assuming the app, platform, or company perimeter can always protect your information, or that they will do the right thing with your data. People should be much more deliberate about what data they share, where they store it, and who can access it. Protection needs to travel with the data, not just sit at the edge of a network. For you, that means choosing services that give you stronger control over your information and being more cautious about oversharing sensitive data in the first place. The data owner should always have governance over said data.” So where do you start?
1) Use unique passwords for every account
A password manager makes this realistic. If one platform gets breached, unique passwords keep the damage isolated to that one account.
2) Turn on multi-factor authentication wherever it is available
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds a layer that survives even when a password is compromised. It is one of the highest-impact steps an individual can take.
3) Run strong antivirus software and keep devices updated
Outdated software is one of the most common entry points attackers use. Strong antivirus software catches threats your instincts might miss, and keeping apps and operating systems current closes the gaps that models like Mythos are built to find. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android & iOS devices at Cyberguy.com
4) Be selective about what you share and where
Every app that holds your data is a potential exposure point. The less you overshare, the smaller your footprint becomes.
5) Use a data removal service
Data brokers collect and sell your personal information, often without you ever knowing. Data removal services find where your data is listed and request its removal. You cannot control every place your information travels, but you can shrink the trail it leaves behind. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com
6) Choose services that offer real data control
Not all platforms treat your data the same way. Look for services that let you see, manage and limit how your information is used and where it goes.
7) Monitor your accounts and credit
Catching a breach early limits the damage significantly. Set up account alerts wherever your bank or financial platform allows it. A credit freeze costs nothing and stops new accounts from being opened in your name without your knowledge.
8) Stay skeptical of phishing attempts
Ackerly warned that scams will get more targeted and harder to spot as AI lowers the barrier for bad actors. Scrutinize every link before you click it and treat unexpected emails or texts asking for login information as suspicious by default. If something feels off, it probably is.
9) Assume breaches will happen
The goal is to limit how much damage they can do. When you operate with that assumption, your decisions about data hygiene get sharper, and your exposure gets smaller.
Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?
Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Kurt’s key takeaways
Mythos did not create the vulnerability problem. It made the scale of it visible in a way that is no longer ignorable. The foundation of modern cybersecurity, the idea that strong enough walls will keep data safe, is being tested in real time by a technology that moves faster than any human team can. That is a consumer story as much as it is a corporate one. Your data lives in systems built on that old model.
And the moment to think differently about how it is protected is now, not after the next major breach makes the headlines. Anthropic made a responsible call by limiting access to Mythos. But the model exists. The capability is real. Other versions of it are being developed. The question for every organization and every individual becomes the same one Ackerly keeps returning to.
When the walls fail, and experts are telling us they will, what is actually protecting your data on the other side? Let us know your thoughts by writing to us at Cyberguy.com
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
Apple’s plot to crush OpenAI
Apple is suing OpenAI. The complaint is readable and intense, as these things often are, though many experts seem to think many of the allegations are just the ways things are done. So what does Apple really want here, and why is it picking such a public fight with OpenAI?
On this episode of The Vergecast, Nilay and David go through the lawsuit, and look at Apple’s history of splashy litigation to determine whether Apple is worried about a possible competitor or simply looking to capitalize on a weak moment for OpenAI. All this is happening as Apple ships the public betas of its new software, headlined by the new Siri AI, and we have thoughts about what it all means — and whether the new Siri is actually any good.
Technology
New bank scam laws could stop suspicious payments
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Your phone rings, and the caller says your bank account is under attack. To protect your savings, you must move the money right now. The caller sounds calm. The instructions feel official. However, the “safe account” belongs to a scammer. That pressure can turn years of savings into an irreversible transfer. Georgia now gives some banks and credit unions another chance to interrupt the payment before the money leaves.
House Bill 945 took effect July 1, 2026. The law lets financial institutions pause certain transactions when they reasonably suspect financial exploitation. It protects adults age 65 or older. It also covers adults with qualifying physical or mental incapacities, Alzheimer’s disease or dementia. The idea sounds simple. Yet the details matter because your bank’s power may depend on your state, your account and the institution’s own policy.
YOUR FAMILY COULD BE ONE PHONE CALL FROM A BANK SCAM
Free live CyberGuy class: Sick of Spam? Join us July 22.
Join us Wednesday, July 22, at 1 PM ET for a free CyberGuy Live class that will help you cut down on robocalls, spam texts, junk email and other unwanted messages. Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson will walk you step by step through simple ways to filter spam, clean up your inbox and recognize the messages that could put your personal information at risk. No technical experience is needed. You’ll also receive our spam-stopping checklist, and every registrant will get a link to the class recording afterward.
Reserve your free spot today at CyberGuyLive.com.
Georgia’s new bank scam law lets financial institutions pause certain suspicious transactions involving older or vulnerable adults. (Getty)
Georgia’s new bank scam law can pause a suspicious payment
Under Georgia’s law, a financial institution may place a hold on a transaction linked to suspected exploitation. The law can cover an eligible adult’s account or an account where that adult is a beneficiary. It can also reach an account belonging to someone suspected of carrying out the exploitation. That last provision gives the law extra reach. In practice, it could help when suspicious money arrives in another customer’s account. The institution may have room to stop the payment from moving farther when the facts support concern.
However, the law gives banks discretion. It says a financial institution may place the hold, but it does not require one. Therefore, a worried teller or fraud analyst still has to notice the warning signs and act. The law also focuses on the suspicious transaction. It does not automatically shut down every payment or withdrawal connected to the account.
A possible 30-day delay comes with limits
A Georgia hold initially expires after 15 business days. The bank may add up to 15 more business days if its review still supports the exploitation concern. A court may shorten or extend that period. The bank must notify authorized account parties and any trusted contact within three business days. It can skip someone it reasonably suspects of taking part in the exploitation. The institution must also begin reviewing the facts behind its decision.
Before using this power, the institution must train the employees involved. It also needs written procedures for reviewing suspected exploitation. The law gives institutions liability protection when they act in good faith and use reasonable care.
A trusted contact can help without controlling your money
Georgia’s law also allows an eligible adult to name a trusted contact for an account. That person could be a relative, friend or another adult the account owner trusts. The bank may contact that person when it suspects exploitation. It may also ask for help confirming contact information, health status or the identity of someone holding power of attorney. In some cases, the institution may share only that it suspects exploitation.
A trusted contact does not automatically gain access to your balance. The role also does not grant authority to move your money or make decisions for you. Federal regulators describe the contact as a backup person whom the institution can alert when something looks wrong.
Which states let banks pause suspected scam payments?
Georgia is part of a much larger shift. As of today, at least 33 states have enacted laws that let banks, credit unions or other covered financial institutions delay certain transactions when they suspect financial exploitation.
The FTC’s most recent nationwide chart identified 24 states with these laws.
However, the agency warned that its chart was only a snapshot and advised readers to check current state statutes.
However, the agency warned that its chart was only a snapshot and advised readers to check current state statutes. Since that report, nine additional states have enacted protections.
These 33 states have enacted transaction-hold protections
The states are:
- Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia and Idaho
- Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi and Montana
- Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Rhode Island
- South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wyoming
The laws do not give every bank the same power. Some let an institution pause a payment on its own. Others require a report to law enforcement or adult protective services. The protected age can also vary, while several states include younger adults with qualifying disabilities. Hold periods differ even more. A delay may last only a few business days in one state. Elsewhere, an investigation or court order can keep the payment on hold much longer.
HOW FLORIDA RETIREE LOST $200K IN FAKE PAYPAL REFUND SCAM
Scammers often pressure victims to move money quickly, while transaction-hold laws aim to create time for review. (Photo by Nikolas Kokovlis/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Nine states have joined the list since the FTC’s last review
Here is what the newer state laws do.
Colorado
Colorado’s HB 26-1110 created the Adults’ Security and Safeguards from Exploitation in Transactions Act, known as the ASSET Act. It lets a bank or credit union delay a disbursement when it reasonably believes a vulnerable adult faces financial exploitation. The institution must notify law enforcement or adult protective services. A decision generally must be made within 90 days. That period can reach 180 days when an agency investigation remains underway. The law takes effect August 12, 2026.
Georgia
Georgia’s HB 945 lets a financial institution place a hold on a suspicious transaction involving an eligible adult. The law also reaches accounts where the adult is a beneficiary. In some cases, it can cover an account belonging to the suspected perpetrator. The initial hold lasts up to 15 business days. A bank may extend it for another 15 business days when its review continues to support the concern. The law also includes trusted contacts, employee training and written notice requirements.
Idaho
Idaho enacted HB 182, known as the Report and Hold law, in 2025. It covers a broad range of financial businesses, including banks, credit unions, lenders, money transmitters and investment firms. Covered professionals may temporarily pause suspicious transactions and report suspected exploitation. The law also gives them liability protection when they act in good faith.
Maine
Maine’s 2025 law covers adults age 65 or older and people protected by the state’s Adult Protective Services Act. A bank or credit union may delay a disbursement when it reasonably believes the payment could result in exploitation. The institution must notify the Maine attorney general within two business days. The hold generally ends within 15 business days unless a court extends it. Customers may also be able to designate a trusted contact.
Maryland
Maryland’s Vulnerable Adult Banking Protection Act covers residents age 65 or older and vulnerable adults who cannot provide for their daily needs. A financial institution may delay or deny a suspicious disbursement. An initial delay can last 15 business days. The institution or an investigating agency can extend it for up to 25 business days from the original request date. The law takes effect October 1, 2026.
North Carolina
North Carolina’s SB 595 gives financial institutions broad authority to delay or refuse transactions involving suspected exploitation of older or disabled adults. The law covers withdrawals, transfers and some requested account changes. An initial delay can last up to 30 business days. The institution may extend it for another 30 business days if it continues to believe exploitation is occurring. Banks may also alert a trusted contact.
Oklahoma
Oklahoma’s SB 2067 requires financial institution employees to report suspicious activity internally and notify an appropriate agency. Banks and credit unions may place a temporary hold on a reported account. They can also contact someone previously designated by the account holder. The law takes effect November 1, 2026.
South Dakota
South Dakota’s HB 1238 lets a financial institution delay or refuse certain transactions when it reasonably believes exploitation may have occurred or is being attempted. The law protects senior and vulnerable adults. It also covers a consenting adult who asks the institution to take protective action.
Vermont
Vermont’s Act 106 lets covered financial institutions delay a transaction when they reasonably believe a customer faces financial exploitation. The initial delay can last 15 business days. The institution may add another 15 days when it believes the exploitation may continue. Vermont approved the law on May 20, 2026.
Why bank scam protections vary by state
The federal Senior Safe Act encourages financial professionals to report suspected exploitation. It also offers liability protection to covered institutions and trained employees who make qualifying reports. However, the law does not create one nationwide transaction-hold rule for checking and savings accounts. Investment accounts follow a different framework. FINRA Rule 2165 lets a brokerage firm temporarily hold certain disbursements or securities transactions when it reasonably believes an eligible adult faces financial exploitation.
The rule generally covers adults age 65 or older along with some younger adults who have qualifying impairments. As a result, a brokerage firm may have national regulatory authority to pause a suspicious request. A bank handling your checking account may depend more heavily on the law in your state.
A state law still cannot guarantee your payment will stop
Most state laws give a bank permission to act rather than requiring it to block every suspicious payment. The institution still needs to recognize the warning signs and have enough information to reasonably suspect exploitation. Your protection may depend on your age, the account involved and where you live. Your bank’s internal policies and employee training also play a role. Even in a state with a transaction-hold law, a payment may go through before anyone realizes a scam is underway.
Scammers know speed works in their favor
CyberGuy has reported on grandparent scams that use urgent calls, stolen details and AI-cloned voices. We have also covered crypto kiosk scamswhere frightened victims followed a caller’s instructions while the money moved beyond easy recovery. Georgia also used HB 945 to add safeguards for virtual currency kiosks, another payment method scammers use to move money quickly.
In both cases, the scammer wants to keep you isolated. They may warn you not to call your family or bank. They might claim that an employee is part of the investigation. A transaction hold attacks that pressure tactic. It adds time, which gives someone a chance to ask a basic question: Does this story make sense? Of course, no law will catch every scam. A payment can move through a different state, another financial service or a crypto wallet. Also, a bank may miss the warning signs or choose not to place a hold.
THE GIFT THAT PROTECTS YOUR DAD FROM SCAMMERS
House Bill 945 took effect July 1, 2026, giving Georgia banks more authority to delay payments tied to suspected exploitation. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
Do these bank scam transaction hold laws work?
An ABA Foundation survey commissioned from 158 banks offers an early view. Half of the responding banks in states with hold laws said they had used the authority to delay, refuse or hold transactions. Nearly 90% of respondents in states without such laws supported adopting them. The survey reflects the banking industry’s experience rather than a nationwide independent study. Even so, it shows that banks see value in having time to investigate.
That time can also create a difficult balance. Banks need enough authority to stop a devastating payment. Yet they must avoid blocking legitimate transactions based on age alone. Georgia tries to address that concern with a reasonable-cause standard. It also requires notice, employee training and an internal review. Whether the law succeeds will depend on how institutions use those tools.
How to protect your money from bank scams
You should not assume your bank can reverse a scam payment. You also cannot count on it pausing every suspicious transaction. The safest approach is to put protections in place before an urgent call, text or email catches you off guard.
1) Ask your bank about trusted contacts and transaction holds
Call your bank’s fraud department and ask whether you can add a trusted contact to your account. Then ask what the bank does when an employee suspects financial exploitation. You should also find out whether your state allows the bank to delay a suspicious transaction. The answer may differ between your checking account and your brokerage account.
2) Turn on instant alerts for account activity
Enable notifications for withdrawals, transfers and card purchases. Choose the lowest available dollar threshold so you hear about unusual activity quickly. Also review your bank’s daily transfer and wire limits. Lower limits can make it harder for a scammer to move a large amount of money in one transaction.
3) Make sure your trusted contact understands the role
Choose someone who will answer quickly and question an unusual request. Make sure that person knows your bank may call if something appears wrong. A trusted contact does not automatically gain access to your money. The role gives your bank another way to reach someone you trust during a possible emergency.
4) Create a family code word for emergencies
Choose a private word or phrase that family members can use to verify a real emergency. If someone calls claiming a loved one needs money, ask for the code word. Then hang up and contact your relative through a phone number you already have. Never call a number provided by the person demanding payment.
5) Never transfer money to a so-called safe account
A bank, government agency or law enforcement officer will not tell you to protect your savings by transferring them to another account. Scammers often use the phrase “safe account” to make a fraudulent transfer sound official. Do not send money through a wire transfer, cryptocurrency kiosk or payment app while someone is pressuring you to act immediately. End the conversation and call your bank using the number on the back of your card or its official website.
6) Use strong security software on your devices
Strong antivirus software can help detect malicious links, fake websites and downloads that scammers use to steal financial information. Keep the software updated on your phone and computer. Security software cannot stop every phone scam. However, it can block some of the digital tools criminals use before they reach your bank account. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at CyberGuy.com.
7) Reduce the personal information scammers can use
Scammers may pull your age, relatives’ names, phone number and address from data broker and people-search websites. They can use those details to make a fake emergency sound convincing. A data removal service can help reduce how much personal information appears on these sites. It cannot remove every record from the internet, but it can make it harder for criminals to build a detailed profile around you or your family. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting CyberGuy.com.
8) Act quickly if money starts moving
Call your bank’s fraud department as soon as you suspect a scam. Ask the institution to stop, recall or flag the transaction. Change your online banking password from a trusted device and review recent account activity. If you shared login details, ask the bank whether it should lock online access or issue new account numbers. Next, report the incident to local law enforcement and the appropriate fraud agency. For suspected elder financial abuse, you can also contact Adult Protective Services in your state.
Kurt’s key takeaways
Georgia’s new law gives financial institutions explicit authority to pause certain transactions when they suspect financial exploitation. However, the hold remains optional, and the protection applies only in qualifying situations. The issue reaches far beyond Georgia. At least 33 states have enacted some form of transaction-hold authority for banks or credit unions, although several newer laws have later effective dates. The protections still vary, so your state and financial institution can shape what happens during the most urgent minutes of a scam. Add a trusted contact where available. Talk with your family about how to verify an emergency and learn how your bank handles suspicious payments. A five-minute conversation today could create the pause that saves someone’s life savings later.
Should a bank have the power to delay your payment when it believes a scammer is directing you, even if you insist the transfer is legitimate? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
Fortnite is getting a bunch of AI-powered ‘personas’
Get ready for more AI characters in Fortnite. Developer Epic Games is going to let Fortnite creators publish experiences featuring characters with AI-powered voices starting on July 30th, and ahead of that launch, it’s created 36 characters with “consistent voices and personas” that creators can use as NPCs. The characters include Fortnite staples like Agent Jonesy, Peely (the banana), Fishstick (a walking fish), and Cuddle Team Leader (who wears a pink bear mascot head).
Epic tested the waters of AI characters with last year’s Darth Vader NPC that was powered by James Earl Jones’ voice — a collaboration that Jones’ estate signed off on. Even though players quickly got Vader to swear, something Epic fixed quickly, the company announced shortly after debuting Vader that Fortnite creators would be able to make AI-powered characters of their own.
The voices for these new personas rely on “performances captured from independent professional actors specifically for use in developer-made islands,” Epic says. “The actors agreed to have their performances used to develop voice models that create the spoken responses for these LLM-powered Fortnite characters.”
Down the line, it sounds like Epic wants to make characters featuring voices from the well-known actors that have appeared in the Fortnite universe, but it will have to secure the right approvals to do so. “Our next step is to work with the relevant guilds and character voice actors who have previously worked on Fortnite Battle Royale to explore opportunities to make their original voices available across the Fortnite ecosystem,” the company says.
-
Hawaii39 seconds agoMaui County expands ADU rules, boosts housing opportunities
-
Idaho7 minutes agoCougar kitten named at Zoo Idaho in Pocatello – Local News 8
-
Illinois13 minutes ago
Illinois GOP trails badly in midterm cash
-
Indiana19 minutes agoChance for storms continue into the weekend across Central Indiana
-
Iowa25 minutes agoWill Moon, Iowa football donor and owner of Iowa 80 truck stop, dies at 64
-
Kansas31 minutes agoKansas City Current vs San Diego Wave FC: Where to watch, TV channel, live stream & kick-off time | Goal.com US
-
Kentucky37 minutes agoAdkins among new appointments to Kentucky State Fair Board
-
Louisiana43 minutes agoHow vital is New Orleans to Louisiana’s economy? See the data after Landry’s ‘special’ comments.