Entertainment
'The White Lotus' Season 3, Episode 5 recap: Tim in the corner (of despair), finding his religion
“The White Lotus,” Mike White’s black comedy anthology series, is back on HBO for a third season. Times staffers love an escape, but since we can’t take a trip to Thailand to stay at a luxury resort, the next best thing is to immerse ourselves in the new season. Follow along with us for each episode as we discuss theories, observations and our favorite moments leading up to the finale. (Read our recaps: Episode 1, Episode 2, Episode 3 and Episode 4.)
It’s a full moon over on “The White Lotus” and several characters are grappling with their awakening, spiritual or otherwise.
Things begin with Gaitok (Tayme Thapthimthong), who after frantically poring over security camera footage for the missing handgun, concludes it’s Tim (Jason Isaacs) who swiped it. But his attempts to confront Duke’s finest white collar bandit are fumbled — Gaitok leaves the security kiosk unattended (again) and gets distracted by Mook (Lalisa Manobal) as she performs a traditional dance. (Gaitok, sweetie, a promotion is never going to happen this way!) When he does approach Tim in the bathroom, Gaitok lacks the imposing demeanor to intimidate him into fessing up to the theft, let alone returning the gun.
Victoria (Parker Posey), on the other hand, is concerned with a bullet that’s been fired at dinner. Piper (Sarah Catherine Hook) finally tells her parents the real intention for the trip was to check out a Buddhist meditation center she plans to join for a year. Tim is in a fog of lorazepam and dread, so the news barely registers, but its a SOO-NAH-ME of emotions for Victoria, who, unlike her husband, can’t temper her reaction with pills. It leads to another Grade A unchristian-like meltdown from the matriarch who is convinced the center could be a sex cult — ala NXIVM — and is not impressed that the monk who runs it has authored books: “So, Charles Manson wrote books! Bill Clinton wrote books. The list goes on. Hillary Clinton wrote five books … Look at the Catholics! Organized religion and deviant sex can go hand in hand.”
The other Ratliff members — Saxon (Patrick Schwarzenegger) and the little magician (aka Lochy, played by Sam Nivola) — are chasing their own highs, with blender boy trying to hype his younger brother into some escapades with their female companions. Chloe tries to gauge Chelsea’s willingness to cheat on their respective bald(ing) white guys, but Chelsea scoffs at the idea. Chloe isn’t so opposed, even while eerily acknowledging: “Gary might kill me. I honestly think he’s capable of it.” The foursome wind up high on some happy pills that, before long, results in an incestuous smooch that seemingly leaves Lochy in a state of content and Saxon … well, it’s hard to ever know what’s going on in that head.
As Chelsea processes the sibling make-out sesh, Rick (Walton Goggins) is in Bangkok on his quest to avenge his father’s murder. He first meets up with a mysterious pal (Sam Rockwell) — maybe its Frank? — for an incredibly head-spinning catch-up session that touches on his sobriety, sexuality and spirituality. It leaves Rick flummoxed but he also can’t dwell on it too long because he needs another favor from this nameless friend, who brought a duffle bag full of items (a gun, among its contents) at Rick’s request as he carries out his plan.
Elsewhere, seeking their own wild adventures far away from the water guns and AARP crowd, Jaclyn (Michelle Monaghan), Kate (Leslie Bibb) and Laurie (Carrie Coon) are on the loose with Val (Arnas Fedaravičius) and his Russian besties at a night club, making small talk about ballet and dead parents. After a good stretch of dancing and drinking, the Super Soaked Trio decide to head back to their villa. Jaclyn suggests the men join them, much to the dismay of our bob-haired Independent voter. Once the rollicking at their villa’s pool is over and everyone turns in for the night, Jaclyn reaches out to Val — despite her endless pushing for Laurie to pursue him — for a luxury resort booty call. Jaclyn’s not alone in her late night rendezvous. When Belinda (Natasha Rothwell) learns from hotel manager Fabian (Christian Friedel) that Greg/Gary (Jon Gries) has been inquiring about her, she worries she’s in danger. Pornchai (Dom Hetrakul) promises to keep her safe and lands in her bed in the process.
But distress was all Tim was experiencing in his corner of the White Lotus. Feeling the full weight of his situation, the former altar boy scrawls a short letter to his family — “I’m so sorry. I love you all.” — just before raising the handgun to his temple. But as a sleepy Victoria shuffles in, his plan is diverted. The episode closes out with Tim calling to a higher power: “Oh, please, God. Please. Tell me what to do.”
Now it’s time for Greg Braxton and Yvonne Villarreal, platinum-status members of “The White Lotus” frequent guest program, to break it all down. They’re joined by new charter member, Mary McNamara, who will ride out the rest of this season’s voyage.
Belinda (Natasha Rothwell) is on edge, but Pornchai comes to the rescue.
(Fabio Lovino/HBO)
Who do we think is the corpse this week? Does the gun in Rick’s possession change things?
McNamara: There were a lot of seemingly random shots in the opening scene, far too many for one handgun so it is possible that Rick’s gun makes it back to the hotel. The corpse in question appears to have dark hair and be dressed in gray or light blue. Zion flees from it, so it’s not Belinda. Tim has been rocking a lot of pastels (Isaacs in crisp linen is a high point of the series) and there would be irony in him contemplating suicide only to die in another way. But now I very much fear that it’s Pornchai; Belinda deserves a kind lover but this series is not big on happy endings. Either way, my scene-one theory remains fixed: Somehow a monkey gets hold of a gun (so many random shots) and some bright person (Gaitok?) is trying to play cowboy and shoot it. Result: mayhem.
Braxton: Although I had previously speculated that Chelsea was doomed because she felt she had cheated death twice during this vacation, I’m going to take a knee on any further predictions for now. In the previous two seasons, the victims seem to have been people who had made very poor choices which put them on a path to destruction. And almost every character in this episode makes some very, very horrible choices, so the field is wide open. Karma is coming.
Villarreal: I, too, have wondered if one of our monkey friends could be the gunslinger responsible for the shootout in the season’s opening scene. But I still think the floating corpse met death another way. I’m growing more suspicious of Saxon’s blender. Maybe someone whipped up a smoothie with the poisonous fruit to avoid detection? But I am also stuck on Victoria’s dependency on lorazepam and her mention of grand mal seizures. Could her withdrawal lead to her death?
Do you think Tim would feel this doomed about his involvement in a white-collar crime in 2025? What kind of life could the Ratliffs set up in Thailand if they never went back home?
McNamara: The fact that he’s so rattled leads me to believe he does not regularly commit fraud — he does not appear well lawyered-up — so yeah, maybe. If this were not “The White Lotus,” I would say Tim, and potentially the whole family, would join Piper on her monastic quest. But it is, so at this point, I’m assuming that Tim will somehow get away with whatever he’s done and they’ll all return home. Including Piper.
Braxton: Tim hit bottom at hyper-speed. It’s only been what, a couple of days at a lavish resort, and he’s gone from agreeable man on vacation to drug addiction to putting a gun to his head?
Villarreal: After last week’s episode and Victoria’s observation that the yacht was full of scammers and tax cheats — as her husband sat next to her, no less — it certainly feels like Piper’s grand plan to live in Thailand is signaling an extended family stay. Saxon will adjust to life fine if his blender is nearby. And Lochlan will be fine if Saxon is nearby. (Please don’t mistake my sarcasm for encouraging incest!) Tim can be some kind of boatie. Victoria would need to get her prescription refilled to keep her functioning in this setting for a prolonged time. I would demand a spin-off to see how this plays out. What if Victoria reaches enlightenment and helps that monk write a book?
What’s your read on Jaclyn’s behavior? Is it a midlife crisis?
McNamara: I don’t love the “forty-something actress needs to prove she’s still hot” storyline (possibly because we OD’d on it with “The Substance”), but I do like the simmering high-school tensions between the three women because high school is forever. One of my favorite images from this episode is Kate, sober in her jammies but trying to appear game while Jaclyn and Laurie cavort with the Russians before finally calling “bedtime.” I feel you, Kate!
Braxton: Both Jaclyn and Chelsea seem to crave validation from men for them to feel good about themselves, which is not terribly progressive. Chelsea is miserable without Rick, who is not nice to her, while Jaclyn is frustrated that she can’t get a call back from her significant other. They could both use a talking-to from Piper, who is trying to get to the essence of her identity without male validation. But in the end, what happens at the White Lotus stays at the White Lotus.
Villarreal: As someone who feels like I’ve been slapped by Mother Time when I learn someone was born in the 2000s, I get it. And, sure, the pressure is heightened for someone like Jaclyn because her job as an actress is to look young and glamorous. Plus, her younger hot husband is leaving her on read. It’s just funny to me that the woman who is lugging a ludicrously capacious Erewhon tote bag — by the way, that detail led me down this rabbit hole — to a nightclub is spiraling this much on vacation over that.
Jaclyn (Michelle Monaghan) takes the party home from the club.
(Fabio Lovino/HBO)
What do you make of the story Rick’s friend shared over chamomile tea? And how are you feeling about the addition of Rockwell to the cast?
McNamara: I have watched that scene like four times because it is such an off-the-chain exploration of privilege, not to mention addiction, and a master class in acting. Rockwell deserves an Emmy for best delivery of most bizarre over-drinks-catch-up in the history of television. Here’s hoping his character makes his way to the White Lotus (to maybe hook up with real-life wife Bibb?), in which case, I might have to ditch my “monkey with a gun” theory. Or not.
Braxton: Off the chain? In a season that has already highlighted jaw-dropping moments like Tim’s accidental “package” reveal, that whole sequence seemed so abruptly dark and extreme. I felt I was watching a different show. Hopefully there is a point to that interaction other than shock value and Rick reacting in slack-jawed silence. If I had been reconnecting over drinks with a friend I hadn’t seen in awhile, and he lays down a story out of the blue with the detail of how he’s hiring a strange woman watch him have drug-fueled bizarro sex, punctuated with the line, “I am her, and I’m f— me,” I would not be happy having that visual in my head. Not your usual, “I’m having a drink with the guys.” At that point, it would have been “Waiter, check!” or “Could I have another, and make it a double? Forget that. Just bring the bottle!” It’s a lot.
Villarreal: I immediately messaged our editor and told her it felt like I watched an entire season of “Severance” in that one scene. “White Lotus” is all about exaggerated stereotypes and cultural conflicts and prejudices. And this reveal from Rockwell’s character, which touched on his experience with kathoey, Thailand’s ladyboys, who have long been part of the country’s cultural landscape, as a privileged westerner grappling with existential sexual curiosity and identity (or is he?) left a striking impression — as it was undoubtedly meant to do. The pairing of Rockwell and Goggins, simply sipping on scotch and chamomile tea as it all unfolded, was stunning to watch.
Do you think Chloe knows more than we suspect about Greg/Gary? And why would Fabian downplay Belinda’s concerns about him?
McNamara: Well, she obviously knows enough to be a bit afraid of him, but not enough to, you know, get the hell out. Fabian remains a conundrum — is he just a “don’t rock the boat” ladder-climber or is it more sinister? I still find it hard to believe that no one at this White Lotus knows about Tanya’s death, or Gary’s potential involvement. I feel like there would have been a corporate seminar or at least a memo.
Braxton: I’m still trying to figure out why Chloe and Gary/Greg are hanging out at the White Lotus when he has a fabulous house? And why the massive yacht since they apparently have no one to hang out with other than strangers from the resort. As for Fabian, he does not strike me as the sharpest knife in the drawer. And is Belinda really that scared of Gary/Greg, or did she just want to find a clever excuse to get Pornchai into bed with her?
Villarreal: Greg, to your point, I feel like Greg/Gary may be some sort of secret investor in the White Lotus — because you’ll remember when that one retiree that repulsed Jaclyn at the other pool, she claimed she couldn’t get access to the White Lotus pool because she wasn’t a guest. If Gary/Greg isn’t a guest either, there has to be a reason they let him in … and maybe why Fabian is reluctant to assist Belinda in her suspicions about him? Or maybe he’s been given consolation vouchers after the death of Tanya? I don’t know how much Chloe knows about Greg/Gary’s past misdeeds, but I wonder if she’s clued in on his current plan and that’s where this awareness comes from? Are they scoping out the place, with Chloe always there to figure out its weak spots (Gaitok!) so they know where to make their grand move? It’s really getting hard carrying all these questions in my brain.
Is Gaitok more likely to get a promotion, land a date with Mook or die?
McNamara: Gaitok is absolutely the worst security guard ever. Despite the earlier robbery, he repeatedly abandons his post, not to mention leaving a loaded handgun out in the open. And then, when Tim stonewalls him about stealing a gun, Gaitok doesn’t respond with the obvious “dude, there’s video.” He just backs off. I mean, come on. Does he want blood on his hands? He doesn’t deserve any of these things but since “The White Lotus” is more about underlining injustice than resolving it, he might wind up achieving all three.
Braxton: Gaitok will wind up alone and working at the snake shop, driving snake-bitten customers to the hospital.
Villarreal: I need Gaitok to watch “Paul Blart: Mall Cop” to hype himself up in this role. The promotion will never happen. I can see him landing a date with Mook, only because it’ll be part of whatever grand plan she may be involved in. Because of the lack of screen time for Manobal, the Blackpink K-Pop singer and one of the most famous people in the world, it must mean there’s something up her sleeve that will reveal itself soon enough.
The Ratliff brothers (Sam Nivola, Patrick Schwarzenegger) get a little too close for comfort.
(Fabio Lovino/HBO)
Do you think the Internet will be OK after the brother smooch?
McNamara: Um, no. The ick factor between the siblings has been pretty high already. It’s easy to hate Saxon and love Loch but something about their opposing swagger and innocence spells trauma to me. I’d say everyone needs to stay away from Chloe, who clearly thrives on stirring up trouble, but it’s obviously too late.
Braxton: It was a riff on “Challengers.” Almost expected Zendaya to show up.
Villarreal: I’m scared and I’m scarred.
Who gets your Best Facial Expression award this week?
McNamara: Rick, during his friend’s insane sexual identity story. Frozen panic struggling with non-judgmental empathy. I would give anything to see all the takes from that scene.
Braxton: Jaclyn’s wide-eyed “I just hit the lottery” amazement lying in bed after Val unveils his six-pack abs.
Villarreal: I’m with Mary. I felt like I was looking in the mirror when the camera panned to the evolution of Rick’s reactions to his friend’s story. The shift in his delivery of “really?” over a five-second span was perfection.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review – The Testament of Ann Lee (2025)
The Testament of Ann Lee, 2025.
Directed by Mona Fastvold.
Starring Amanda Seyfried, Lewis Pullman, Thomasin McKenzie, Matthew Beard, Christopher Abbott, David Cale, Stacy Martin, Scott Handy, Jeremy Wheeler, Tim Blake Nelson, Daniel Blumberg, Jamie Bogyo, Viola Prettejohn, Natalie Shinnick, Shannon Woodward, Millie-Rose Crossley, Willem van der Vegt, Esmee Hewett, Harry Conway, Benjamin Bagota, Maria Sand, Scott Alexander Young, Matti Boustedt, George Taylor, Alexis Latham, Lark White, Viktória Dányi, and Roy McCrerey.
SYNOPSIS:
Ann Lee, the founding leader of the Shaker Movement, proclaimed as the female Christ by her followers. Depicts her establishment of a utopian society and the Shakers’ worship through song and dance, based on real events.
The second coming of Christ was a woman. Narrated as a story of legend and constructed as a cinematic epic, co-writer/director Mona Fastvold’s The Testament of Ann Lee tells the story of the eponymous 18th-century preacher who occasionally experienced divine visions guiding her on how to teach her and her followers to free themselves and be absolved of sin.
This group, an offshoot of Quakers known as Shakers, did so by stimulating and intoxicating full-body rhythmic dancing movements set to many hymns beautifully sung by Amanda Seyfried and others. The key distinction between the group, and arguably the toughest selling point of the film aside from the religious nature of it all, is that Ann Lee asserted that the only way to achieve such pure holiness is by giving up all sexual relations, living a life of celibacy (as evident by some laughter during the CIFF festival screening when she made this decree, which quickly subsided as it is relatively easy to buy into her mission and convictions).
It shouldn’t necessarily come as a surprise that Mona Fastvold had trouble getting this one off the ground. Perhaps what finally secured the project’s financial backing was all those awards The Brutalist (directed by her husband Brady Corbet and co-written by her, flipping those duties and credits this time around) either won or was nominated for, which was notably another film that almost no one had interest in making. The point is that this should serve as a reminder that there is an audience for anything and everything.
Whether one doesn’t care about religious movements or is a nonbeliever, The Testament of Ann Lee is remarkably hypnotic in its craftsmanship. It features a flat-out career-best performance from Amanda Seyfried, who blends all of her strengths as an actor and unleashes them at the peak of her talent. Yes, there are moments of tragedy and trauma, but the film refuses to wallow in misery, chartering her Shakers movement with hope, miracles, and perseverance as the journey takes them from Manchester to Niskayuna, New York, in search of expanding their follower base while dealing with other setbacks within the movement and personally.
Chronicling Ann Lee’s life with precise editing that rarely drags (and mostly fixates on the early stages of the Shakers movement and decade-plus long attempt to battle sexism as a female preacher and find a foothold amidst escalating tensions between British and Americans), the film also offers insight into the events that gave her a repulsion for sexual intimacy, her marriage with blacksmith Abraham (Christopher Abbott), and dynamics with her most loyal supporters which includes brother William (Lewis Pullman) and Mary (Thomasin Mckenzie, also serving as the narrator). Given the unfortunate nature of how most women, especially wives, were expected to have zero agency compared to their male counterparts and deliver babies, it is also organically inspiring watching her find a group with similar beliefs willing to trust her visions and take up celibacy. Whether or not all of them succeed is part of the journey and, interestingly enough, shows who is genuinely loyal and in her corner.
This is no dry biopic, though. Instead, it is brimming with life and energy, mainly through those “shaking” sequences depicting those outstandingly choreographed seizure-like dance numbers (typically shot by William Rexer from an elevated overhead angle, looking down at an entire room, capturing a ridiculous amount of motions all weaving together and creating something uniformly spellbinding). The songs throughout are divinely performed, adding another layer to this film’s transfixing pull. Nearly every image is sublime, right up until the perfect final shot. Admittedly, the film loses a bit of steam in the third act as one awaits a grim confrontation with naysayers who feel threatened by her position, movement, and pacifism regarding the burgeoning American Revolution.
Still, whatever reservations one has about watching a religious movement preaching peace and celibacy while laboring away building a utopia (an aspect that puts it in great juxtaposition with The Brutalist) will wash away like sin. That’s the power of the movies; even someone who isn’t religious will find it hard not to be swept up in Ann Lee’s life. Fact, fiction, bluff… it doesn’t matter; the material is treated with conviction and non-judgmental respect. In The Testament of Ann Lee, Amanda Seyfried channels that for something holy, empowering, infectious, and all around breathtaking.
Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★
Robert Kojder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist
Entertainment
The 5 best science books of 2025
It’s been an uneasy year for science. While there were significant milestones, like breakthroughs in gene editing for rare diseases and novel insights into early human evolution (including fire-making), the U.S. science community at large was rocked by institutional challenges. Drastic federal cuts froze thousands of research grants, and the Trump administration began actively working to dismantle the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Meanwhile, fraudulent scientific research papers are on the rise — casting a shadow over academic integrity.
Our picks for this year’s best in arts and entertainment.
Thankfully, we can still turn to our bookshelves — and podcasts — to ground us. We tapped science doyenne Alie Ward, the host of the funny cult favorite “Ologies” podcast, to share her picks for the best science books of 2025.
Spanning fascinating subjects from bees to human anatomy, Ward’s insightful list reminds us that books remain a timeless vessel for truth and knowledge.
“Ferns: Lessons in Survival From Earth’s Most Adaptable Plants”
By Fay-Wei Li and Jacob S. Suissa
Hardie Grant Books: 192 pages, $45
“Dr. Li is the botanist of our dreams… the way he talks about ferns and why he loves them, and about growing up in Taiwan (in essentially a fern forest), and how the sexual reproduction of ferns has been a great way to draw attention to the LGBTQ and nonbinary community is so charming and funny. They even named a whole genus after Lady Gaga because they were listening to ‘Born This Way’ a lot in the lab and also because there are sequences in their DNA that are ‘GAGA.’
“Laura Silburn’s illustrations are gorgeous — they really put a lot of texture into some of these plants that are really tiny. Every page is like looking at a botany poster. As we’ve seen so much science research being underfunded, especially in the last year, there’s this big question by the culture at large of why does it matter? Why does studying the fern genome matter? It has real-world impacts — that’s fewer pesticides on your crops because we figured out something from a foreign genome. I always love when something is overlooked or taken for granted and because of someone’s passion and their dedication to studying it, we learn that it can change our lives.”
“The ABCs of California’s Native Bees”
By Krystle Hickman
Heyday: 240 pages, $38
“Krystle is an astounding photographer and an incredible visual artist. Her passion for native bees is infectious. A lot of people, when they think of bees, they think of honeybees. And honeybees are not even native to North America. They’re not native to L.A. They’re not native to this country. They’re feral livestock. What I love about her book is it opens your eyes to all of these species that are literally right under our noses that we wouldn’t even consider — and that a lot of people wouldn’t even identify as bees.
“The other reason why I love this book is that she puts these essays into it that are about her experiences going to find the bees. So you’re getting to see these gorgeous landscape pictures. You’re getting to see what it took to find the bee, how to look for it, and more about this particular species. It’s organized in these ABCs that you can pick up at any chapter and check out a bee you’ve never heard of before.”
(Little, Brown and Company)
“Humanish: What Talking to Your Cat or Naming Your Car Reveals About the Uniquely Human Need to Humanize”
By Justin Gregg
Little, Brown: 304 pages, $30
“Justin is hilarious. He is such a good writer, and his voice is really, really approachable. The way that he writes about science is through such a wonderful pop culture and pop science lens. You feel like you’re reading a friend’s email who just has something really interesting to tell you.
“This book is all about anthropomorphizing everything from our toasters to why we like some spiders but hate other spiders. This is a discussion that is so important in this time when we literally have bots on our phones that are like, ‘I’ll be your best friend.’
“Justin speaks to human psychology and our need to want to be friends or villainize objects —or technology or animals — and project our own humanity onto them in ways that are sometimes helpful and sometimes dangerous.
“As a science communicator, you can tell people the most fascinating facts and can give them the best stories. But unless you can give people a takeaway, then a lot of times it doesn’t stick or the interest isn’t there. He really addresses the question of ‘Well, what does this mean for my life?’”
“Replaceable You: Adventures in Human Anatomy”
By Mary Roach
W.W. Norton & Co: 288 pages, $28.99
“I’m a long term simp for Mary Roach.
“The humanity that she brings is such a wonderful base for how our bodies fail us sometimes and what we are trying to do to bring them back. From her being present during orthopedic surgeries and the way that she describes the sound of hammer on bone (and just the kind of jovial atmosphere in an operating room that, as a patient, you would never be clued in about because you are passed out half dead on a slab). She really soaks up a vibe that you would never have access to. She goes to Mongolia to learn about eye surgery there in yurts. She takes you to places you would never be able to go. She’s rooting around in archives and old papers — she just makes anything interesting.
“Mary really is both an ally and an outsider, and I think that that’s a really beautiful thing in her book.”
“The Double Tax: How Women of Color Are Overcharged and Underpaid”
By Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman
Portfolio: 256 pages, $29
“Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman is an absolute force. I’ve followed her work in economics and in equity for years, and I was really excited for this book to come out. We did an episode on kalology, which is the study of beauty standards, years ago and I have always loved the conversation of how different members of society have a certain tax on them — these extra resources that they are expected to provide.
“I was really excited to read about specifically women of color, because that is something that I don’t feel is discussed at large. Anna combines the sociology of it with the reality of her experience and other women of color. Because she is so deft when it comes to policy and economics, she also considers, ‘What can we do about this?’ It’s not just enough to discuss this, but what can be done?
“She has totals of what the gender gap is and what the double tax is, and it’s written up like a receipt. This book really addresses the double tax in a way that, even if you have no insight or it’s something that you haven’t thought about — or you are someone who hasn’t experienced this — it’s laying it out economically in a way that is really accessible and has a lot of impact.”
Recinos is an arts and culture journalist and creative nonfiction writer based in Los Angeles. Her first essay collection, “Underneath the Palm Trees,” is forthcoming in early 2027.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: An electric Timothée Chalamet is the consummate striver in propulsive ‘Marty Supreme’
“Everybody wants to rule the world,” goes the Tears for Fears song we hear at a key point in “Marty Supreme,” Josh Safdie’s nerve-busting adrenaline jolt of a movie starring a never-better Timothée Chalamet.
But here’s the thing: everybody may want to rule the world, but not everybody truly believes they CAN. This, one could argue, is what separates the true strivers from the rest of us.
And Marty — played by Chalamet in a delicious synergy of actor, role and whatever fairy dust makes a performance feel both preordained and magically fresh — is a striver. With every fiber of his restless, wiry body. They should add him to the dictionary definition.
Needless to say, Marty is a New Yorker.
Also needless to say, Chalamet is a New Yorker.
And so is Safdie, a writer-director Chalamet has called “the street poet of New York.” So, where else could this story be set?
It’s 1952, on Manhattan’s Lower East Side. Marty Mauser is a salesman in his uncle’s shoe store, escaping to the storeroom for a hot tryst with his (married) girlfriend. Suddenly we’re seeing footage of sperm traveling — talk about strivers! — up to an egg. Which morphs, of course, into a pingpong ball.
This witty opening sequence won’t be the only thing recalling “Uncut Gems,” co-directed by Safdie with his brother Benny before the two split for solo projects. That film, which feels much like the precursor to “Marty Supreme,” began as a trip through the shiny innards of a rare opal, only to wind up inside Adam Sandler’s colon, mid-colonoscopy.
Sandler’s Howard Ratner was a New York striver, too, but sadder, and more troubled. Marty is young, determined, brash — with an eye always to the future. He’s a great salesman: “I could sell shoes to an amputee,” he boasts, crassly. But what he’s plotting to unveil to the world has nothing to do with shoes. It’s about table tennis.
This image released by A24 shows Timothée Chalamet in a scene from “Marty Supreme.” (A24 via AP)
How likely is it that this Jewish kid from the Lower East Side can become the very face of a sport in America, soon to be “staring at you from the cover of a Wheaties box?”
To Marty, perfectly likely. Still, he knows nobody in the U.S. cares about table tennis. He’s so determined to prove everyone wrong, starting at the British Open in London, that when there’s a snag obtaining cash for his trip, he brandishes a gun at a colleague to get it.
Shaking off that sorta-armed robbery thing, Marty arrives in London, where he fast-talks his way into a suite at the Ritz. Here, he spies fellow guest Kay Stone (Gwyneth Paltrow, in a wise, stylish return to the screen), a former movie star married to an insufferable tycoon (“Shark Tank” personality Kevin O’Leary, one of many nonactors here.)
Kay’s skeptical, but Marty finds a way to woo her. Really, all he has to say is: “Come watch me.” Once she sees him play, she’s sneaking into his room in a lace corselet.
This image released by A24 shows Gwyneth Paltrow in a scene from “Marty Supreme.” (A24 via AP)
This would be a good time to stop and consider Chalamet’s subtly transformed appearance. He is stick-thin — duh, he never stops moving. His mustache is skimpy. His skin is acne-scarred — just enough to erase any movie-star sheen. Most strikingly, his eyes, behind the round spectacles, are beady — and smaller. Definitely not those movie-star eyes.
But then, nearly all the faces in “Marty Supreme” are extraordinary. In a movie with more than 100 characters, we have known actors (Fran Drescher, Abel Ferrara); nonacting personalities (O’Leary, and an excellent Tyler Okonma (Tyler, The Creator) as Marty’s friend Wally); and exciting newcomers like Odessa A’Zion as Marty’s feisty girlfriend Rachel.
There are also a slew of nonactors in small parts, plus cameos from the likes of David Mamet and even high wire artist Philippe Petit. The dizzying array makes one curious how it all came together — is casting director Jennifer Venditti taking interns? Production notes tell us that for one hustling scene at a bowling alley, young men were recruited from a sports trading-card convention.
Elsewhere on the creative team, composer Daniel Lopatin succeeds in channelling both Marty’s beating heart and the ricochet of pingpong balls in his propulsive score. The script by Safdie and cowriter Ronald Bronstein, loosely based on real-life table tennis hustler Marty Reisman, beats with its own, never-stopping pulse. The same breakneck aesthetic applies to camera work by Darius Khondji.
Back now to London, where Marty makes the finals against Japanese player Koto Endo (Koto Kawaguchi, like his character a deaf table tennis champion). “I’ll be dropping a third atom bomb on them,” he brags — not his only questionable World War II quip. But Endo, with his unorthodox paddle and grip, prevails.
After a stint as a side act with the Harlem Globetrotters, including pingpong games with a seal — you’ll have to take our word for this, folks, we’re running low on space — Marty returns home, determined to make the imminent world championships in Tokyo.
But he’s in trouble — remember he took cash at gunpoint? Worse, he has no money.
So Marty’s on the run. And he’ll do anything, however messy or dangerous, to get to Japan. Even if he has to totally debase himself (mark our words), or endanger friends — or abandon loyal and brave Rachel.
This image released by A24 shows Odessa A’zion in a scene from “Marty Supreme.” (A24 via AP)
Is there something else for Marty, besides his obsessive goal? If so, he doesn’t know it yet. But the lyrics of another song used in the film are instructive here: “Everybody’s got to learn sometime.”
So can a single-minded striver ultimately learn something new about his own life?
We’ll have to see. As Marty might say: “Come watch me.”
“Marty Supreme,” an A24 release, has been rated R by the Motion Picture Association “for language throughout, sexual content, some violent content/bloody images and nudity.” Running time: 149 minutes. Four stars out of four.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Iowa1 week agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Maine7 days agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico6 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms