Wyoming
DOGE is the talk of Wyoming. What are state leaders saying and doing about the Elon Musk-led cuts? – WyoFile
AFTON—U.S. Rep. Harriet Hageman’s remark about the U.S. Agency for International Development triggered one of the most raucous rounds of applause of the evening.
Even before the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency — aka DOGE — started gutting the federal government’s foreign aid branch, known by its acronym, USAID, the sophomore congresswoman for Wyoming had it in her sights, she said.
“In the interest of full disclosure, a year ago I voted to disband and abolish USAID,” Hageman told a conference room full of Star Valley residents, who cheered and even whooped in approval.
During Thursday’s town hall, Hageman told the rapt audience she doesn’t take issue with USAID’s mission. But then she proceeded to list off programs, echoing President Donald Trump, that she disagrees with, like the $520 million Prosper Africa initiative, which includes an educational curriculum about climate change.
The list ran long.
“I disagree with $20,000 to help LGBT people vote in Honduran elections,” Hageman said. “I disagree with $425,000 towards training Indonesian coffee companies on being gender friendly, and on and on and on.”
More applause erupted.
Ten minutes later, however, Susan Danford pushed back.
“I agree that all those things you read off sound ludicrous,” Danford told Hageman, “but surely they do some good things.”
The octogenarian, who’d traveled 140 miles round-trip from her home in Jackson, didn’t get the chance to complete her thought. A round of applause — every bit as loud as earlier — interrupted.
Hageman conceded that “about 17%” of the aid was “good.” Those things, she said, were moved into the The U.S. Department of State, which is where USAID’s defunct website now lives.
Danford ended the exchange.
“I just think we need to take a deep breath,” Danford said, “and try to start making sense.”
Hageman’s hour-long town hall — part of a southern and western Wyoming circuit the congresswoman is partway through — covered a lot of ground. The Equality State’s lone U.S. House representative touched on her efforts to legislate issues like grizzly bears and Bureau of Land Management resource management plans for its Rock Springs and Buffalo field offices. She also fielded questions about a lack of funding for preventative wildfire-related projects and Afton’s VA clinic, which a veteran who was wounded in combat in Iraq described as a “horrible mess.”
DOGE impacts
A good deal of the discussion, however, circled around what’s perhaps the highest-profile initiative of the second Trump administration: DOGE. The effort to downsize the U.S. government, named after an internet meme, has had impacts on the residents of Wyoming where the federal government owns nearly half of the land and manages it on behalf of all Americans.
Under the Trump administration, official federal job loss figures in Wyoming have not been provided despite numerous requests. But departed and current staff at agency after agency — from the U.S. Forest Service to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to the Bureau of Land Management — have reported involuntary workforce terminations, albeit to varying degrees. Federal offices are being eliminated and funding pools are being frozen for everything from flea fogging to save endangered black-footed ferrets from plague to trail-building on Wyoming’s national forests.
The face of the cuts is Elon Musk, the wealthiest man in the world who was appointed as a special government employee by Trump, the president he often appears alongside.
As Hageman wrapped up in Afton, a man began to bemoan the influence of the “unelected billionaire” before the audience’s applause for the congresswoman cut him off.
In her remarks, Hageman discounted the South Africa-born entrepreneur, a polarizing figure. It’s not Musk who heads DOGE, she said. “A woman by the name of Amy Gleason is the acting director,” Hageman said.
Musk, she added later, isn’t calling the shots. “Congress will ultimately be the ones making the decisions about these various programs,” Hageman said.
Hageman spoke proudly of the $105 billion in federal government spending that DOGE has claimed to have cut as of last Thursday. But she also spoke in support of Wyoming’s federal workers. On site last fall while the historic Elk Fire burned, the congresswoman was “in awe” of Bighorn National Forest Supervisor Andrew Johnson’s “knowledge” and “expertise,” and she extended the praise beyond one person.
“We’ve got some excellent people, some excellent federal employees right here in Wyoming,” Hageman said. “I’ve had a great time visiting with our BLM folks, our Forest Service people who live and work here, and I know that they have the best interest of Wyoming at heart. They have the best interest of these resources at heart. They always have.”
The challenge, she added, was shifting the decision making from Washington, D.C., to the local level.
‘Lot of rumors’
Publicly, Hageman did not address untold numbers of federal workers who’ve been fired or incentivized to leave their Wyoming-based jobs. Asked by WyoFile after the town hall adjourned, she didn’t necessarily agree with the basic premise of a question that concerned how DOGE downsizing was affecting Wyoming’s federal land managers and their staff — her constituents.
“There’s a lot of rumors,” Hageman told WyoFile. “[That] is why I’m going to push back a little bit.”
Like the general public, Hageman has been kept in the dark about Wyoming job loss figures stemming from DOGE.
“I don’t know the answer to that, either,” she said about job cuts in Wyoming.
But the suggestion that cuts were “deep” in places gave Hageman pause.
“Where?” she asked. “When?”
WyoFile cited the Bridger-Teton National Forest’s Pinedale Ranger District, where a combined 12 permanent-seasonal and year-round full-time employees either left their jobs or were fired in the Trump administration’s first two months, according to a federal worker familiar with the numbers. Most of those dozen workers were told to leave in a single day, Feb. 14, which came to be called the Valentine’s Day massacre.
Asked if she was advocating on behalf of any federal land managers behind the scenes, Hageman said she’s been in talks with agencies making sure they can “properly and effectively” manage their resources. Her office has been in touch with both the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Trump administration on the matter, she said.
“We need to have the folks available to do the managing of the resources,” Hageman said. “We’ve also been working with the [congressional] committees to make sure that what is going to happen with bills is going to be effective on the ground.”
Other Wyo. leader takes
Sen. John Barrasso, whose office didn’t respond to an interview request for this story, has publicly praised Musk’s downsizing. The day the Trump administration’s initiative claimed the jobs of an untold number of Wyoming residents, he told Cowboy State Daily that DOGE was “draining the swamp.”
“Congress will work with DOGE to keep key programs operational,” Barrasso said, “while addressing reckless and wasteful Washington spending.”
The remaining member of Wyoming’s congressional delegation, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, has hinted at having a nuanced reception to DOGE and its still-murky impacts. The senator was in the Wyoming Capitol on Feb. 14 and spoke glowingly about the change of administration, which was ushering in a “new golden age,” she said.
“If you’re watching network television, you’re not seeing and hearing what Elon Musk is actually doing to ferret out waste, fraud and abuse,” Lummis told state lawmakers.
But Lummis also has worked to ease the impacts of DOGE cuts on Wyoming, according to a statement from her office. The senator “has made sure the administration understands how important it is [that] our national parks and federal lands are properly staffed.”
Lummis is “sympathetic,” the statement said, to “Wyoming communities affected by proposed cuts.”
During a Wednesday press conference, Gov. Mark Gordon spoke broadly in support of the Trump administration’s slashing of the federal government.
“I do think this administration really does want to get back to letting the states lead,” Gordon told reporters. “That’s a very positive piece of this.”
But the governor also said he recognizes that DOGE cuts are going to be “traumatic” and “a hardship” for some individuals and that “there’s some disturbance that will happen” in some communities. He worried specifically about impacts on the federal firefighting corps, saying he was “very concerned.”
Wyoming’s congressional delegation, the governor said, has done reasonably well in “blunting” losses to some federal agencies, like the National Park Service. The impacts on others, like the Bureau of Land Management, are less clear.
“The point I’ve made to the [Trump] administration is the Biden administration wouldn’t give us any permits to drill oil and gas,” Gordon said. “Now we’re worried if we’ll have people to be able to fill those permits out. The net result, we hope, isn’t zero. We hope that that result is more positive: Permits to drill in Wyoming.”
Wyoming
Wyoming authorities call on Rocky Mountain Power to explain role in massive November power outage
by Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile
The massive, multiple-utility power outage last fall that left some 250,000 customers across parts of Wyoming, South Dakota and Montana without electricity was the result of miscommunication and inadequate procedures during planned maintenance that required de-energizing a power line in southcentral Wyoming, according to a report.
The Nov. 13 incident left thousands of homes and businesses without power for 9.5 hours — longer, in some cases — and knocked out a coal-powered generator outside Glenrock. The unit at the Dave Johnston Power Plant remains offline, leaving Rocky Mountain Power to backfill some 300 megawatts of electricity — enough to power about 225,000 homes.
Without expressly assigning blame to any one party, the report — conducted by the Western Electricity Coordinating Council and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation — indicates a series of communication breakdowns between PacifiCorp (parent company of Rocky Mountain Power), the Western Area Power Administration and, to some degree, electrical grid coordinating teams.
While it’s unclear whether authorities such as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation might pinpoint fault and assess penalties, the Wyoming Public Service Commission has called on Rocky Mountain Power to appear at a hearing scheduled for 2:30 p.m. Wednesday. The commission wants to hear from the utility about “the specifics and details of the event and report,” a public notice announced, and it “may consider and take any action that is in the public interest.”
The hearing at the Public Service Commission’s office located at 2515 Warren Avenue, Suite 300, in Cheyenne, will also be livestreamed at this link.
What happened
According to the 49-page report published in June, PacifiCorp and the Western Area Power Administration were coordinating maintenance on their respective systems that, together, required temporarily de-energizing PacifiCorp’s Aeolus–Clover 500 kilovolt line, which runs east-west and is anchored, in part, by a substation near Medicine Bow.
The effort also required curtailing some local wind energy from feeding the grid, according to the report. But on the day of the planned maintenance, Nov. 13, there was confusion about whether the Western Area Power Administration would scrap its work, so wind energy wasn’t curtailed as originally planned.
” data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/oilcity.news/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Screenshot-2020-08-25-at-4.40.10-PM.png?fit=780%2C439&ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-109941″/><figcaption class=)
Wind turbines near Cheyenne poke into a colorful sunrise in January 2025. (Tennessee Watson/WyoFile)
The report indicates that modeling tools might have failed to accurately measure local grid conditions, so when the power line was de-energized, “power flow rapidly redistributed throughout the northeast portion” of the local grid. “Within six seconds,” according to the report, “an electrical island formed and collapsed, causing widespread effects across that portion of the interconnection.
“The disturbance,” the report continues, “culminated in the loss of more than 4,800 [megawatts] of generation from coal, natural gas, photovoltaic and wind resources.”
The cascading power failure began at about 12:45 p.m. on a Thursday, dragging down portions of service territories operated by Rocky Mountain Power, Black Hills Energy, Montana-Dakota Utilities and some rural electric co-ops.
The report points to failures in communication, process deficiencies and inadequate modeling tools. Wind energy was not “identified as a contributing factor,” according to the report. It credits both battery storage and wind energy throughout the impacted area for supporting “a faster frequency recovery across the interconnection” and for providing “readily available capacity during system restoration.”
This article was originally published by WyoFile and is republished here with permission. WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.
Related
Wyoming
First Alert Weather Days through Sat. for excessive heat, possibly through Wednesday for fire danger
CASPER, Wyo. — Wyoming ranks 29th in the nation for overall health, according to the America’s Health Rankings 2025 Annual Report. That middling score hides a sharper story, and Wyoming voters have the power to change it.
Wyoming performs well on education and income equality, but it ranks 49th in cancer screening and 43rd for its uninsured rate.
At the same time, voter turnout sits at just 56.4%, below the national average, on ballots that will decide who can bridge the gap.
Those things are related, said Dr. Gabriela Alvarado, a health policy researcher at the University of Wyoming and former RAND Corp. analyst.
“All the sources are kind of saying the same thing: Wyoming health is not where it should be,” Alvarado said.
While lawmakers write the laws that shape Wyoming’s health outcomes, voters hold the power to change them. Whether it’s increasing preventative care, funding the 988 hotline, preventing maternity deserts or shortening the distance to the emergency room after a workplace accident, voting could be the difference between life and death.
Ripple effects of policy
To vote smarter, citizens need to know the candidates, their plans to tackle the state’s healthcare challenges, and how those plans translate to policy.
The connections aren’t always clear. The cancer screening rate, for instance, is tied to low HPV vaccination rates and Title X–funded reproductive health clinics, Alvarado said.
“Those clinics screen for cervical cancer and administer the vaccine that prevents it,” she said. “Cultural discomfort deepens the gap, because Americans associate the HPV vaccine with sex rather than cancer prevention.”
Wyoming’s low rates of preventive care are a policy outcome.
Wyoming is one of only 10 states that has not expanded Medicaid, a decision lawmakers have upheld session after session, excluding roughly 9,000 residents who earn too much for the state’s narrow program but too little to afford private coverage.
“That ripples over to all these other indicators,” Alvarado said. “If you don’t have insurance, you’re not going to get a colonoscopy or other forms of cancer screening.”
Dr. Beth Robitaille sees where those people end up. Robitaille is a family physician and interim chief medical officer at the Educational Health Center of Wyoming, a federally qualified health center and residency program with clinics in Casper, Cheyenne and Laramie.
She said her clinics saw more than 60,000 provider visits last fiscal year, and roughly 20% of those patients are uninsured.
Uninsured patients who skip routine care because they can’t pay for it, Robitaille said, arrive only when their conditions have advanced. An uninsured diabetic who can’t afford checkups or insulin develops uncontrolled blood sugar. That can lead to a foot wound, then an infection.
“Those infections often end with amputation, which requires hospitalization,” she said. “That hospitalization and treatment become uncompensated care for the hospital.”
Those unpaid bills added up to $141 million in 2024–25, according to the most recent report by the Wyoming Hospital Association.
Who pays when hospitals fail?
Hospitals recoup the losses by charging insured patients more, Robitaille said. Taxpayers who oppose Medicaid expansion as a cost-saving measure are already covering the bill through premiums instead, which impact the broader community.
“The reality is we’re still paying for it,” Robitaille said. “It’s just in a different manner.”
Her clinic writes off 80%–85% of costs for its lowest-income patients through a sliding fee scale, turning a $140 visit into a $15 charge. Federal funding offsets only part of that.
Robitaille pushed back on a common assumption about who’s uninsured.
“There’s a misconception that it’s all these people taking advantage of the system,” she said. “In 25 years of caring for this population, I find that they are often employed, self-employed or working for small businesses that can’t afford private insurance.”
Michael Shepherd, a political scientist who studies how health outcomes shape politics, said uncompensated care is a leading cause of rural hospital closures nationally.
“That’s everybody’s hospital,” he said. “That’s not just the people who are on Medicaid.”
The stakes are high in Wyoming, a largely rural state in which farming and ranching — among the country’s most dangerous jobs — depend on nearby emergency rooms when workplace accidents strike. Rural residents already travel twice as far as urban patients for care. In life-or-death situations — such as strokes and heart attacks — every mile and minute counts.
Strained hospitals cut services before they close, Alvarado said, and obstetrics usually goes first.
Nearly 60% of rural hospitals nationwide no longer deliver babies. Medicaid pays for nearly half of rural births, and federal cuts under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act are expected to leave about 10 million more people uninsured by 2034, per the Congressional Budget Office.
Yes, but…
The same law created a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program to soften the blow, though researchers estimate it covers only about 37% of the Medicaid funding rural areas stand to lose.
Wyoming’s share is substantial. The state was awarded $205 million in the program’s first year, according to reporting by WyoFile. That’s the second-largest per-capita award in the nation, behind Alaska, and providers can apply for the funds through Aug. 3.
Eric Boley, president of the Wyoming Hospital Association, told Oil City News that those one-time funds have the potential to be “transformational for struggling hospitals.”
“We may be able to use the funds to strengthen OB-GYN and emergency services,” he said. “Studies show that, with heart attack and stroke, getting care within an hour significantly improves your chances of making a full recovery.”
A vicious cycle
So why don’t bad outcomes produce different votes? Shepherd calls the answer the “rural health spiral.”
“Poor outcomes breed resentment toward government, resentment elects candidates who campaign on it, and those candidates pass policies that worsen the outcomes,” he said. “Instead of voters rallying to correct that course, they often double down on the course that they’re on, and things continue to spiral out of control.”
Alvarado worries that voters aren’t connecting policies to outcomes.
“Legislators are there to serve their constituents,” she said. “If we tell our legislators what it is we care about, they know that there’s votes attached to that.”
Breaking the cycle
The mechanism to repair a broken system is the ballot.
Alvarado urged voters to treat elections as a “window of opportunity” when a known problem, an available solution and political will align.
“Whoever wins decides what the Legislature takes up,” she said.
Robitaille framed the choice as a question.
“Is healthcare a right or a privilege?” she asked. “Depending on where you as an individual stand on that question would affect who you vote for.”
Her advice is to go beyond the commercials, social media posts and yard signs to learn where candidates actually stand, because healthcare touches everyone eventually.
“We all need healthcare at some point, or our loved ones do,” she said. “So it affects everybody.”
Related
-
Lifestyle2 minutes agoSam Neill, known for ‘Jurassic Park’ and ‘The Piano,’ dies at 78, his family says
-
Technology14 minutes agoMicrosoft tests Windows Search without all the ads and fluff
-
World20 minutes agoIran-backed terror proxy Houthis threaten fresh attacks after Yemen airport strike
-
Politics26 minutes agoHegseth announces joint task force with DOJ to prosecute leaks to journalists ‘with the full force of the law’
-
Health32 minutes agoMicrowaved squishy toy explodes onto boy’s face and chest amid viral trend, causing horrific burns
-
Sports38 minutes agoFBI, Atlanta police target unauthorized drones flying near World Cup venues
-
Technology44 minutes agoWhy careful people still end up on data broker sites
-
Business50 minutes agoNetflix to add videos from digital publishers to its homepage
