Connect with us

Movie Reviews

1982 Movie Reviews – 48 Hrs, Gandhi, and The Verdict

Published

on

1982 Movie Reviews – 48 Hrs, Gandhi, and The Verdict
by Sean P. Aune | December 8, 2022December 8, 2022 10:30 am EST

Welcome to an thrilling year-long undertaking right here at The Nerdy. 1982 was an thrilling yr for movies giving us a number of movies that might go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. It was additionally the begin to a significant shift in cultural and societal norms, and a few of these nonetheless reverberate to at the present time.

We’re going to select and select which motion pictures we hit, however proper now the record stands at practically 4 dozen.

Sure, we’re insane, however 1982 was that nice of a yr for movie.

The articles will come out – normally – on the identical day the movies hit theaters in 1982 in order that it’s their true fortieth anniversary. All movies are additionally watched once more for the needs of those critiques and usually are not being carried out from reminiscence. In some instances, it actually would be the first time we’ve seen them.

Advertisement

This time round, it’s December 4, 1982, and we’re off to see 48 Hrs, Gandhi, and The Verdict!

Fast facet word: Since we launched this sequence this yr, we’ve found that Classic Video Podcast is doing the very same undertaking with two variations: First, it’s audio (naturally), and second, they’re doing each main movie. We’ve listened to quite a few episodes and it’s enjoyable checking off their ideas towards my very own. Verify them out over at Classic Video Podcast.

48 Hrs

The Eighties had been the golden age of buddy cop comedies. And it positively feels as if 48 Hrs. was the genesis level of this whole trope.

I haven’t seen this movie in a long time, and so I’m glad I went into it fairly recent. Tightly scripted, with insane chemistry between Eddie Murphy and Nick Nolte makes for a really brisk 96 minutes. Whereas I may have carried out with out the silliness of Inspector Cates butting heads with Captain Haden (Franke McRae), however that overplayed “rogue cop” trope had to slot in someplace in right here. That individual portion was an indicator of the late Nineteen Sixties/into the Seventies cop movies, and in some way caught round for the cop comedies. We get it, transfer on from there.

Advertisement

This was Murphy’s first function, and you’d be hard-pressed to persuade me of that. It appeared as if he had been doing this for years and was comfortably at residence co-leading such a big manufacturing.

48 Hrs. isn’t uproariously humorous, but it surely’s humorous. The plot works, the chemistry is wonderful, there may be actually nothing right here to actually complain about. It’s straightforward to see why so many individuals love this film.

Gandhi

Gandhi is a troublesome movie to debate. On the one hand, I’ll get this out of the way in which: Ben Kingsley owns this function and is wonderful. Nothing I say from right here on out is directed at him, or the real-life Gandhi.

This isn’t a well-made movie. It’s so anxious to inform so many moments in Gandhi’s life that it simply glosses over so many different issues. So many facet characters simply seem, after which disappear. Some get introductions, others simply occur to be a significant a part of his life sooner or later reminiscent of his nieces. No introduction for them, there are simply abruptly two younger ladies aiding him and for a bit you assume they should be daughters. You simply don’t know.

And the dealing with of Mirabehn (Geraldine James), a British girl that got here to work with him, is dealt with so clumsily you instantly get pink flags that make Gandhi sound like a cult chief. The movie makes a degree of Gandhi gave her an Indian identify, however we by no means hear something about why he did and it simply comes off sounding bizarre and a bit creepy in a approach.

Advertisement

Richard Attenborough was an completed director by this time, but it surely comes throughout like he merely wasn’t as much as the load of the subject he was attempting to cowl. Many years of a person’s life had been condensed into three hours, and it results in a really chaotic pacing that merely leaves you feeling unfilled in the long run. You’ve got solely probably the most floor understanding of the occasions depicted within the movie, and that may be a disservice to the themes in addition to the viewers.

The Verdict

Paul Newman was a powerful actor and I might have gladly watched him learn the telephone ebook.

… the place that is going.

The Verdict is a courtroom drama within the truest sense that it feels prefer it runs about the identical size as an precise trial. However, fortunately, additionally it is an equal elements character examine, and that’s the a part of the movie that works the most effective. The case portion, nevertheless, that feels so front-and-center, finally ends up being so monotonous. Take, for example, when Frank and Mickey are calling round looking for the nurse that wrote the unique admittance paperwork. This might have been dealt with so successfully with intercut, overlapping dialogue. Let the 2 actors part out and in of focus and overlap.

Nope. We wanted to take heed to these calls in real-time.

Advertisement

The film continues to be price a watch simply to get pleasure from Newman, however don’t be too shocked if you end up checking your watch a number of occasions.

1982 Film Opinions will return on Dec. 10 with Airplane II: The Sequel, Sophie’s Selection, and The Toy!

Enjoyable Jug Media, LLC (working TheNerdy.com) has affiliate partnerships with varied corporations. These don’t at any time have any affect on the editorial content material of The Nerdy. Enjoyable Jug Media LLC might earn a fee from these hyperlinks.


Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Eye for an Eye 2 (2024) by Yang Bing Jia

Published

on

Film Review: Eye for an Eye 2 (2024) by Yang Bing Jia

“A blind man, a kid. You claim to be bounty hunters. Right?”

A surprise hit after its release on various streaming platforms, director and writer Yang’s short online wuxia film “Eye for an Eye: The Blind Swordsman” (2023) starring Xie Miao as the protagonist went on to generate a fair amount of attention both in Mainland China and overseas. Therefore it is inevitable that a sequel soon follows with both Yang and Xie returning. Though scheduled for a wilder cinema release, the much anticipated and a longer follow-up still ended up streaming on iQIYI.

This second installment kicks off in Youzhou during the Tang Dynasty. Believing that five fugitives are hiding in a gambling den, blind swordsman Cheng Xia Zi shows up to arrest them. Naturally, they try to fight their way out but of course they are no match for the lethal bounty hunter. Apparently, Cheng is trying to make as much money as possible so he can retire in Chang An, his old hometown.

Meanwhile, in another part of town, a pair of homeless orphans, Zhang Xiao Yu and her little brother Xiao Cao, are stealing food and are caught up in a confrontation between ruthless officer Li Jiu Lang and his rebels. The merciless Li kills the defenseless rebels, Zhang manages to escape but her brother is not that lucky. While on the run, she accidentally bumps into the grumpy Cheng who reluctantly shelters her. After a while, they start to bond and eventually work as a team to bring the cold-blooded Li and his little empire down.

Yang’s sequel plays like a proper wuxia film probably because of its longer running time which allows him to further develop the main lead characters and the dramatic elements. A subplot that concentrates on the orphan Zhang Xiao Yu, played by Yang En You, a traumatized little girl who is obsessed with revenge after the tragic death of her brother. The bond between her and Blind Cheng which takes on centerstage is engaging and not rushed. However, it seems like director Yang is doing a Zatoichi style adventure with a bit of Lone Wolf and Cub thrown in for good measure at times.

Advertisement

Visually the film looks great, especially the outdoor location of rolling hills, forests and mountain ranges. Besides, the detailed town buildings plus their interiors all look lived in and authentic. The fast and crisp fight sequences designed by action choreographers Qin Peng Fei and Du Xiao Hui are impressive, though quite brutal. Also, the fight which features a thug wielding a pair of flaming sword looks interesting and fun, but it is borrowed from Su Chao Pin and John Woo’s “Reign of Assassins” (2010). Though epic, the end fight between Cheng and three hundred guards seems too far fetched and rushed. However, Yang’s use of split screens during the film’s lighter moments is refreshing.

Actor and martial arts champion Xia Miao, born in Beijing, is no stranger to Asian action films who appears in more than thirty films and TV series. He started his film career as a child actor alongside Jet Li in “The New Legend of Shaolin” (1994) and again in “My Father is a Hero” (1995), these films gained him a reputation both overseas and locally. After that he takes a break to study and then makes a comeback in the TV series “Legend of the Shaolin Temple” (2006) and “The Kung Fu Master” (2010). Xia Miao’s portrayal of the blind bounty hunter Cheng is impressive and his moves are equally smooth and convincing during the many fight sequences.

The introduction of a second lead character, the vengeful child, Zhang Xiao Yu (Yang En You) is a nice touch. Child star Yang is impressive and shines as the orphan Zhang, as she effortlessly tackles the emotional and dramatic moments of the film. In addition, her interchange-like bickering and the playful moments with swordsman Cheng are interesting to watch and a nice distraction from the otherwise violent fight scenes, besides adding the much needed emotional connection. Furthermore, Hung Tao is adequately evil and memorable playing the cruel officer Li Jiu Lang.

Even though the storyline of “Eye for an Eye 2” is predictable and familiar, it is still impressive and satisfying production. Besides, the well written lead characters are a plus, and when topped off with the well choregraphed action and engaging visuals, it all makes for a balanced sequel.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Challengers Movie Review: This intense and intimate tennis drama almost serves up an ace

Published

on

Challengers Movie Review: This intense and intimate tennis drama almost serves up an ace

Challengers also has brilliant world-building, which extends to even the off-court action. We initially see Art, married to Tashi, waking up at the Ritz Hotel to a routine charted out with a choreographed workout and a restricted diet with even a bottled drink labelled ‘Electrolytes’. On the contrary, we see a hungry Patrick, just up from his sleep in the car, borrowing half a doughnut from someone he just met. While these parallels are thought-worthy enough, we get another flashback moment in which Patrick tells Art, “Tashi Duncan is gonna turn her whole family into millionaires,” and Art later ends up living just that life. In another scene, after Patrick and Art play the first set of the Challenger match, the film takes us back to a time when Tashi meets Patrick before the finale match. In a different context, Tashi says, “You typically stagger around the second round,” hinting at how he gets overconfident if he wins the first set. This eventually comes true, as he falters in the second set after winning the first one in the match against Art. If observed and understood keenly, this staging and the callbacks add immense value to the film’s narrative.

Challengers is abundant with scenes of coitus and intense lovemaking akin to the sexual exploration featured in Guadagnino’s Call Me By Your Name, a different genre film. These scenes are placed at the right intervals to take your mind away from the monotony of tennis. Guadagnino gets us quite gripped in the world of tennis, but he also carefully distracts us away from it in a good way. We hear the commentator say, “Code violation, audible obscenity, warning Donaldson,” when Art uses profanity. We also see the usage of jargon like ‘Deuce’ and ‘Advantage’, a focus on Tashi’s backhand stroke, and close attention to how Art and Patrick serve, which makes for a brilliant callback. With these elements, the director ensures that there is enough in the film to appease tennis fans, even as the chemistry and love between the leads keep non-tennis viewers interested in the proceedings.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

This Never Happened (2024) – Review | Tubi Horror Movie | Heaven of Horror

Published

on

This Never Happened (2024) – Review | Tubi Horror Movie | Heaven of Horror

An intriguing premise

When I’m about to watch a supernatural horror movie with a plot that revolves around a home, where a man and his friends used to hang out, then my femicide-senses are immediately tingling.

We meet Emily (María José De La Cruz) who is having terrible nightmares. She’s also medicated, so we’re made aware that there might be some mental health challenges for her. The story begins with her going from the US to Mexico City with her boyfriend, Mateo (Javier Dulzaides).

Mateo’s father recently passed away, so they’re going to his funeral, where Emily will also meet Mateo’s mother and his friends for the first time. Not the best way to meet someone, but Mateo insists it’s as good a time as any.

Before I go any further, let me just say that Mateo’s mother, Melora, was portrayed by Andrea Noli. She looked like a younger Betty Buckley and was just as sharp and funny. The most kitsch and entertaining character in This Never Happened.

Not that the rest of the cast wasn’t good. They were, for the most part. Especially María José De La Cruz as Emily was good. Andrea Noli was simply a true scene-stealer!

Advertisement

Anyway, as soon as Emily arrives at the house (which is more like a high-tech mansion), she starts seeing things. Things as in a woman, who seems to be an angry and violent spirit. Of course, this comes as absolutely no surprise, when we see how Mateo’s friends are entitled rich kids.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending