Connect with us

Crypto

Hong Kong’s Successful Approach To Cryptocurrency Regulation

Published

on

Hong Kong’s Successful Approach To Cryptocurrency Regulation

A number of measures show that Hong Kong is determined to foster a “vibrant ecosystem” for virtual assets and other related products.


Jill Wong, partner at law firm Reed Smith, writes about
how Hong Kong tackles regulating cryptocurrencies, a task
which involves judging how to balance innovation against
risk.


The editors are pleased to share these views and invites
readers’ responses. The usual editorial disclaimers apply. Email
tom.burroughes@wealthbriefing.com




Like many other jurisdictions, the initial response in Hong Kong
to the advent of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies was to ask:
“what is this?” This has since evolved, although in the
initial stages of regulatory thinking virtual assets (VAs) were
regulated only to the extent that they fitted into existing laws
governing financial services. For example, VAs that resemble
traditional securities were treated as ‘securities’ or “futures
contracts’ under existing securities laws, and were subject
to the licensing, marketing and other requirements under Hong
Kong law.


However, as these laws were not formulated with VAs in mind,
there were VAs that did not fit neatly into traditional
definitions and so fell outside the regulatory net. The
securities regulator, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures
Commission (SFC), took steps to address this in the form of
public statements, warning the public that VAs, such as
cryptocurrencies, needed to be licensed. For instance, Initial
Coin Offerings could be seen as “collective investment
schemes,” and therefore required a licence under the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO), whilst bitcoin futures
also required a licence under the SFO as “futures contracts.”

Advertisement


Matters accelerated in 2018 when the SFC expanded its regulatory
oversight to cover existing SFC licensees who were portfolio
managers and distributors of VA funds. This was a significant
step in bringing greater oversight and stability to the VA
ecosystem.


The SFC issued a position paper in 2019, outlining a new
framework for regulating centralised VA trading
platforms (VATPs). VATPs that provide trading services in both
non-security VAs and security VAs would fall within the
regulatory net of the SFC. However, a loophole existed: VATPs
that only dealt with non-security VAs remained unregulated.


This was soon dealt with. In June 2023, after extensive
consultation, Hong Kong enacted a comprehensive licensing regime
for VATPs. Under this regime, VATPs performing activities in
non-security VAs are required to obtain a VATP licence under the
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance
(AMLO).


The current position and outlook

Hong Kong has ambitions to be a VA hub. It is already moving in
the right direction, with the UN Trade & Development Report in
2023 ranking Hong Kong ninth in the world in terms of its
preparedness for frontier technologies. Hong Kong’s commitment to
innovation (while giving due protection to investors) and a
crypto-friendly legal framework have also positioned the
territory as a global leader in the VA space.


Hong Kong regulators continue to supplement the current framework
for VAs. This includes introducing licensing regimes for issuers
of fiat-referenced stablecoins and over-the-counter trading in
VAs. The regulators have already completed public consultations
on these regulatory proposals and plan to introduce the relevant
legislation soon.

Advertisement


Hong Kong also became the first jurisdiction in Asia to offer
retail investors the ability to trade spot bitcoin and Ether
ETFs, pioneering an in-kind redemption mechanism. This provided
investors with additional flexibility to buy and sell shares of
crypto tokens with a portfolio of securities, financial
derivative instruments or VAs instead of cash.


This is a pivotal move to integrate VAs into mainstream financial
products in Hong Kong. The inclusion of Ether also opens the door
for new ETFs tracking other major cryptocurrencies. This will
further diversify the offerings of exchange-traded products in
Hong Kong which now include a metaverse ETF, a blockchain
ETF and some VA futures ETFs.


Hong Kong is also investing heavily in fintech, a key driver for
the city’s competitive advantage. For example, the Hong Kong
government has commissioned the Hong Kong Monetary Authority
(HKMA) to subsidise training costs for eligible practitioners in
the finance sector under the Fintech Subsidy Scheme.


The latest 2023 “Fintech Promotion Roadmap” outlined five key
pillars for development, emphasising the adoption of fintech
solutions across Hong Kong’s banking industry, expanding the
fintech-savvy workforce, and enhancing data infrastructure.
At the same time, the HKMA’s exploration of a retail Central Bank
Digital Currency, the e-HKD, reflects the regulator’s commitment
to staying at the forefront of digital currency innovation.


Earlier this year, the HKMA launched a stablecoin
“sandbox.” This allows prospective issuers to conduct
experiments under relaxed regulatory settings and will facilitate
dialogue between the issuers and regulators. A high-profile
example is a fintech firm, founded by a former senior regulator,
actively working on a Hong Kong dollar-backed stablecoin,
partnering with prominent players in the digital payments and VA
sectors to explore the use of its stablecoin in retail and
cross-border payments.

Advertisement


Legal advantages?

Hong Kong’s legal system also provides a favourable environment
for the VA industry. Cryptocurrencies have been recognised by
Hong Kong courts as ‘property’ which can be the subject of a
trust in a liquidation context. The courts have also granted
freezing injunctions over cryptocurrencies as asset preservation
measures. These rulings provide welcome certainty for traders and
investors.


That said, while Hong Kong can be viewed as a crypto-friendly
jurisdiction, it is not an “easy” jurisdiction for regulatory
arbitrage. The current VATP licensing regime is stringent and
robust (some argue too stringent). The existing licensing regime
sets out detailed criteria for applicants’ financial resources,
management and governance structure, VA token admission
requirements, client assets custody, and anti-money laundering
and counter-terrorist financing policies.


The SFC has also reiterated that VATPs cannot serve mainland
Chinese residents. These exacting requirements and the lack of
access to mainland customers may have prompted several major
exchange players to withdraw their VATP licence applications.


However, a robust regulatory regime is arguably a necessary
foundation for sustainable growth. It gives credibility to
businesses that commit to compliance and boosts investor
confidence. This would explain the undiminished interest in Hong
Kong amongst the 17 would-be VATPs waiting to be licensed.


Is Hong Kong edging out the competition?

Traditional financial institutions interested in VA distribution
or fund management should be encouraged by recent moves by the
HKMA and SFC. In December 2023, the HKMA and SFC issued the third
joint circular on intermediaries dealing with VAs, expanding the
way for brokers, advisors and fund managers to provide VA-related
services.

Advertisement


There are additional guardrails for investor protection: most
VA-related products are likely to be considered as complex
products and, except in limited circumstances, distributors will
therefore need to comply with existing requirements for sales of
complex products. This includes a suitability assessment of the
VA-related product for the investors.


Only professional investors would have access to these
products. However, there are some options for retail
investors because they can trade VA-related products that are
traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and some other specified
exchanges and the VA funds that are authorised by the SFC for
public offering. This should be a major boost to the VA markets
in Hong Kong.


In addition, the SFC has already greenlighted 25 funds allowing
them to have portfolios that invest more than 10 per cent in VAs.


Traditional banks and securities brokers can also offer VA
dealing services through partnerships with SFC-licensed VATPs.
Several securities brokers have already obtained the go-ahead
from the SFC and, whilst there are currently only two licensed
VATPs, there are likely to be more in future.


These measures demonstrate Hong Kong’s determination to foster a
vibrant ecosystem for VAs, innovative products, and those
that distribute, manage and invest in them. The global
marketplace is competitive, but Hong Kong has positioned itself
at the forefront of this global market and is well-placed to reap
the rewards in the coming years.

Advertisement




Disclaimer: This is for information only and is not
legal advice. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Bitcoin, Cerebras IPO mania, and the SpaceX speculation angle traders are watching | investingLive

Published

on

Bitcoin, Cerebras IPO mania, and the SpaceX speculation angle traders are watching | investingLive

Bitcoin is trading near $81,750, up around 2.5% at the time of publication, after rising almost 3.5% from today’s open to its session high. The move comes on the same day that Cerebras Systems (CBRS) delivered one of the most aggressive AI IPO debuts of the year, reinforcing a broader risk-on mood across speculative technology assets.

Cerebras priced its IPO at $185 per share, raising about $5.55 billion by selling 30 million shares, according to Reuters. The stock began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker CBRS, opened sharply higher, and traded as high as $385, more than 100% above the IPO price. (Reuters)

That matters beyond the semiconductor sector. A debut like this tells traders that the market is still willing to pay extreme premiums for scarce AI-related growth assets. When that happens, the same speculative psychology can spread into adjacent themes: AI infrastructure, private-market mega-valuations, Elon Musk-linked companies, and sometimes Bitcoin.

Why does the Cerebras IPO matter for Bitcoin sentiment?

The direct link between Cerebras and Bitcoin is weak. Cerebras is an AI semiconductor company, not a crypto company. But the sentiment link is more interesting.

A 108% intraday IPO move suggests that investors are again rewarding high-growth, high-narrative assets. Bitcoin often responds well when markets move into a risk-on liquidity environment, especially when the leadership is coming from technology, AI, and speculative growth.

Advertisement

This does not mean the Cerebras IPO “caused” Bitcoin to rally. It means the IPO may be part of the same broader market condition: investors are willing to chase upside when the narrative is powerful enough.

How does SpaceX fit into the Bitcoin story?

The confirmed SpaceX-Bitcoin connection is simple: Elon Musk said in July 2021 that SpaceX owned Bitcoin. During “The B Word” event with Jack Dorsey and Cathie Wood, Musk said he personally owned Bitcoin, Tesla owned Bitcoin, and SpaceX owned Bitcoin. (CoinDesk)

However, there is no confirmed operational SpaceX-Bitcoin integration. SpaceX does not appear to use Bitcoin for launches, Starlink is not known to be built on Bitcoin rails, and there has been no confirmed public disclosure showing that Bitcoin is central to SpaceX’s business model.

The stronger factual connection is treasury exposure, not infrastructure.

A second important point is that in 2023, the Wall Street Journal reported that SpaceX had written down the value of its Bitcoin holdings by $373 million across 2021 and 2022 and had sold Bitcoin, based on internal financial documents reviewed by the publication. (The Wall Street Journal)

Advertisement

So the clean timeline is:

Year SpaceX and Bitcoin development
2021 Musk publicly says SpaceX owns Bitcoin
2023 Reports say SpaceX wrote down and sold Bitcoin exposure
2025-2026 Crypto-market speculation continues around possible wallet activity and Musk-linked payment infrastructure, but wallet attribution is not audited corporate confirmation

Why is the SpaceX IPO angle relevant now for crypto investors and traders?

SpaceX is widely viewed as one of the most anticipated potential IPOs in global markets. Some market commentary has discussed possible trillion-dollar valuation scenarios, although investors should treat specific valuation numbers carefully unless confirmed through official filings or reliable primary reporting. (Capital.com)

The connection for Bitcoin is not that SpaceX itself is necessarily buying Bitcoin today. The connection is more psychological:

  1. Cerebras shows that AI and deep-tech IPO demand is extremely strong.

  2. SpaceX would likely be seen as an even bigger narrative asset if it lists.

  3. Elon Musk remains strongly associated with crypto markets.

  4. Bitcoin can benefit when speculative capital rotates into scarce, high-conviction assets.

In other words, a huge Cerebras IPO does not prove anything about SpaceX or Bitcoin, but it does support the idea that the market’s appetite for mega-narrative assets is alive.

What is the most actionable Musk crypto angle?

For traders, the more actionable Musk-related crypto optionality may be X Money, not SpaceX.

Advertisement

Reuters reported in March 2026 that Musk said X Money would enter early public access in April, as part of the broader effort to turn X into a payments-enabled “everything app.” X previously partnered with Visa for payment functionality. (Reuters)

That does not confirm Bitcoin integration. But if X Money ever adds Bitcoin, Dogecoin, or broader crypto rails, that would likely be more directly relevant to crypto-market pricing than a speculative SpaceX IPO narrative.

Bitcoin trading read today

Bitcoin’s move to around $81,750 keeps the short-term tone constructive. The day is positive, the market is reacting well to broader risk-on signals, and the Cerebras IPO adds another data point showing that investors are willing to chase high-growth narratives.

Still, traders should separate confirmed facts from speculative fuel:

Factor Confirmed? Bitcoin relevance
Cerebras priced IPO at $185 Yes Shows strong AI risk appetite
CBRS traded up to $385 Yes Reinforces speculative momentum
SpaceX has owned Bitcoin Yes, based on Musk’s 2021 comments Real but historical balance-sheet link
SpaceX sold or reduced Bitcoin exposure Reported by WSJ in 2023 Reduces certainty around current exposure
SpaceX IPO will directly lift Bitcoin No Speculative sentiment link only
X Money may eventually support crypto Not confirmed More actionable if verified

Make or Break for Bitcoin: Inside the Psychological Battle at the 200-Day Moving Average and What It Means for the Broader Trend

BTSUSD (spot) daily chart with the 200 SMA indicator

Advertisement

Why Bitcoin traders watch the daily chart first

Short-term traders often live on the 1-minute, 5-minute, or 15-minute chart. That makes sense if they are scalping small moves. But for the bigger Bitcoin picture, the daily chart is still the main reference point.

The daily chart matters because it filters out a lot of the noise.

On smaller timeframes, Bitcoin can look bullish in the morning, bearish two hours later, and neutral by the end of the day. A single headline, a liquidation flush, or a short-term algorithmic move can distort the picture. The daily candle gives a cleaner view because it compresses the full trading day into one clear message: who controlled the session, buyers or sellers?

That is why the daily chart tends to carry more weight for serious market participants. Large funds, institutional desks, and longer-term crypto investors are not usually making major allocation decisions based on a 5-minute pattern. They are looking at the broader trend, the key daily levels, and whether Bitcoin is being accumulated or distributed over several sessions.

There is also a crowd psychology element. Because so many traders and investors look at the daily chart, the levels on that chart become important simply because everyone is watching them. When Bitcoin approaches a major daily moving average, a prior daily high, or a key daily support zone, it often attracts real order flow. Traders place entries there, stops gather there, and algorithms react there.

Advertisement

In crypto, that matters even more because Bitcoin trades 24/7. The daily chart gives the market a shared reference point in a market that never really sleeps.

Why the 200-day SMA matters more than a random moving average

There is nothing magical about the number 200 from a pure math perspective. A 157-day moving average, a 180-day moving average, or a 220-day moving average can sometimes fit price better during a specific period.

But markets are not driven by math alone. They are driven by human behavior, institutional habits, and widely followed reference points.

That is why the 200-day simple moving average matters.

It is one of the most watched long-term trend indicators in global markets. Stocks, commodities, crypto, ETFs, and indexes are all judged against it. When Bitcoin trades above the 200-day SMA, many market participants view it as healthier. When Bitcoin trades below it, the tone often becomes more cautious.

Advertisement

For many traders, the 200-day SMA acts like a macro line in the sand:

Bitcoin vs. 200-day SMA Common market interpretation
Above the 200-day SMA Trend looks healthier, dips may attract buyers
Below the 200-day SMA Market remains more defensive, rallies may be sold
Testing the 200-day SMA from below A major trend-repair test
Rejecting from the 200-day SMA Bears may still control the bigger structure

This does not mean Bitcoin automatically becomes bullish the moment it touches the 200-day SMA. It means the market starts paying closer attention.

Why not use a 157-day SMA instead?

A 157-day SMA might look good on a backtest. It might even fit Bitcoin perfectly for a few months. But it does not have the same market weight.

The 200-day SMA has a network effect.

That means it matters because so many people use it. Retail traders watch it. Fund managers watch it. Analysts talk about it. Financial media report on it. Trading systems often include it. Risk models may also reference it.

Advertisement

A 157-day SMA does not have that same crowd behind it. If Bitcoin touches a 157-day SMA, most of the market will not notice. There are probably fewer orders around it, fewer stops around it, and less emotional reaction around it.

But when Bitcoin tests the 200-day SMA, the market notices.

That is why Bitcoin can often pause, reverse, accelerate, or consolidate around this level. It is not because the line itself has power. It is because the market gives it power.

Why the Golden Cross and Death Cross still get attention

The 200-day SMA is also important because it is part of two of the most famous long-term trend signals:

Signal What it means
Golden Cross The 50-day SMA crosses above the 200-day SMA. This is usually viewed as a bullish macro signal.
Death Cross The 50-day SMA crosses below the 200-day SMA. This is usually viewed as a bearish macro signal.

These signals are not perfect. They can arrive late. They can also fail. But they still matter because they are widely followed and often reported by mainstream financial media.

Advertisement

In Bitcoin, these signals can influence sentiment, especially when they appear near major price levels, after a long correction, or during a broad risk-on move in tech and crypto.

What Bitcoin’s current 200-day SMA test means

Bitcoin is now testing the underside of its declining 200-day SMA. That makes this a major trend-repair moment.

A clean daily close above the 200-day SMA would not guarantee a new bull market, but it would send an important message: Bitcoin is trying to neutralize the broader downtrend. That could encourage more buyers to step in, especially if the breakout is supported by volume, stronger risk appetite, and follow-through in the next few sessions.

On the other hand, if Bitcoin fails at the 200-day SMA and rolls over, the market may read that as a sign that the bigger trend is still not fully repaired. In that case, traders may treat the move as another rally into resistance rather than a confirmed bullish shift.

For now, the key point is simple: Bitcoin is not just testing another moving average. It is testing one of the most watched macro trend lines in the market. That is why the reaction around this level matters

Advertisement

Today’s takeaway for Bitcoin investors and traders

Bitcoin’s positive session is not only about crypto. It is happening during a broader moment of aggressive risk appetite, with the Cerebras IPO showing how much capital is willing to chase AI and scarcity-driven growth stories.

The SpaceX angle is worth monitoring, but it should not be overstated. The confirmed connection is historical Bitcoin ownership. The speculative connection is that a future SpaceX IPO, especially one linked to Elon Musk, AI, Starlink, space infrastructure, and private-market scarcity, could strengthen the broader “Musk premium” across speculative assets.

For now, Bitcoin bulls want to see today’s strength hold into the close. A sustained hold above the current acceptance area would support the view that buyers are still in control. A failure to hold the day’s gains would suggest that the Cerebras-SpaceX-Bitcoin narrative is more of a sentiment spark than a durable driver.

Always do your own research and trade Bitcoin at your own risk only. The above is for educational purposes only.

Join our free investingLive Telegram channel for more market updates, trade ideas, and other gems: https://t.me/investingLiveStocks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

ADI Foundation and Settlemint Launch ADGM Tokenization Rail for $30.9B RWAs

Published

on

ADI Foundation and Settlemint Launch ADGM Tokenization Rail for .9B RWAs

Integrated Infrastructure for Institutional Adoption

ADI Foundation and Settlemint announced a partnership on May 13 to launch a new digital securities infrastructure on the ADI Chain, aiming to streamline the tokenization of assets within the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) regulatory framework.

The collaboration integrates ADI Foundation’s compliance-ready Layer-2 blockchain with Settlemint’s digital asset lifecycle platform (DALP). The combined system is designed to handle the entire lifespan of a digital security, from initial token creation and on-chain recording to post-trade servicing and management.

The move addresses a primary hurdle for institutional investors: the difficulty of coordinating issuance, trading, settlement, and custody across fragmented jurisdictions. By providing an integrated architecture, the partners aim to offer a unified pathway for institutions to move traditional assets onto the blockchain.

“The future of investment and trading will not only be digitized, but also available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,” said Andrey Lazorenko, CEO of ADI Foundation. “Our partnership brings together market infrastructure, institutional-grade blockchain, and a digital asset lifecycle platform to tokenize equities and trade them on secondary platforms.”

According to a media statement, the platform utilizes Settlemint’s implementation of the ERC-3643 standard—a protocol specifically designed for security tokens to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. While the partnership is initially focusing on equity tokenization, the infrastructure is built to support a variety of other tokenized securities and financial instruments, pending regulatory approval.

The announcement comes as institutional interest in real-world assets ( RWAs) on-chain continues to accelerate. According to data from RWA.xyz, tokenized RWAs currently represent approximately $30.92 billion in on-chain value, with tokenized U.S. Treasuries accounting for roughly $15.20 billion of that total. Market analysts expect this trend to scale significantly. A 2026 analysis by BCG suggests the digital asset market could surge from $0.6 trillion in 2025 to $18.9 trillion by 2033.

Advertisement

Matthew Van Niekerk, co-founder and president of Settlemint, characterized the partnership as a “blueprint” for the broader financial industry.

“This partnership proves that regulated, multi-asset tokenization at national scale on public blockchains is not just feasible, but live,” Van Niekerk said. He added that the infrastructure is intended to be a model that central securities depositories (CSDs), exchanges, and clearing houses can adopt to integrate digital assets into existing operations.

Continue Reading

Crypto

BlackRock COO: Cryptocurrency Demand Surpasses Firm’s Expectations, Signaling a Shift in Value

Published

on

BlackRock COO: Cryptocurrency Demand Surpasses Firm’s Expectations, Signaling a Shift in Value

BlackRock Chief Operating Officer Rob Goldstein revealed that demand for cryptocurrency has significantly exceeded the firm’s initial projections, marking a notable shift in institutional sentiment toward digital assets. Speaking during a Binance online stream, Goldstein addressed the market’s reception of BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), IBIT, and outlined the asset manager’s broader strategic outlook on blockchain-based finance.

Demand Driven by Value Proposition, Not Speculation

Goldstein emphasized that the global demand for IBIT was stronger than anticipated, describing the interest not as fleeting speculative enthusiasm but as a recognition of a new value proposition rooted in emerging technology. He noted that investors are increasingly viewing cryptocurrency as a distinct asset class with potential for long-term portfolio diversification, rather than a short-term trading vehicle. This perspective aligns with BlackRock’s broader push to integrate digital assets into traditional investment frameworks.

Advertisement

Tokenization and the Future of Capital Markets

Goldstein predicted that the tokenization of capital market instruments remains in its early stages, with future growth expected to be measured in multiples rather than incremental percentages. He argued that blockchain infrastructure could fundamentally reshape how assets are issued, traded, and settled, reducing friction and increasing transparency. This view is consistent with growing industry interest in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, a trend that major financial institutions are beginning to explore.

AI Agents and Digital Rail Transactions

In a forward-looking comment, Goldstein suggested that artificial intelligence agents will eventually conduct transactions directly via digital rails, or blockchain infrastructure, rather than logging into traditional bank accounts. This vision points to a future where automated systems interact with decentralized finance protocols, potentially streamlining operations across supply chains, payments, and asset management. While still conceptual, the statement underscores BlackRock’s attention to the convergence of AI and blockchain technologies.

The Education Gap Remains a Key Obstacle

Goldstein identified the primary barrier to broader adoption as a lack of investor education regarding the technical aspects of virtual assets and efficient portfolio allocation. Many institutional and retail investors remain uncertain about how to evaluate cryptocurrencies, assess risks, and integrate them into existing investment strategies. BlackRock’s emphasis on education suggests that the firm sees informed participation as critical to sustainable market growth.

Conclusion

BlackRock’s acknowledgment that cryptocurrency demand has exceeded expectations carries significant weight, given the firm’s status as the world’s largest asset manager with over $10 trillion in assets under management. Goldstein’s comments reflect a maturing institutional perspective that views digital assets not as a passing trend but as a structural evolution in finance. For investors, the key takeaway is that major financial players are moving beyond skepticism and actively building infrastructure for a tokenized future, even as educational gaps persist.

FAQs

Q1: What did BlackRock’s COO say about cryptocurrency demand?
Rob Goldstein stated that demand for cryptocurrency, particularly through BlackRock’s IBIT Bitcoin ETF, has exceeded the firm’s expectations, driven by a recognition of its value as an emerging technology rather than mere speculation.

Advertisement

Q2: What is BlackRock’s view on tokenization?
Goldstein described tokenization of capital market tools as still in its infancy, with future growth expected to be exponential. He believes blockchain infrastructure will play a key role in transforming how assets are managed and traded.

Q3: What is the biggest obstacle to cryptocurrency adoption according to BlackRock?
The main challenge is a lack of investor education on the technical aspects of virtual assets and how to allocate them effectively within a portfolio, according to Goldstein.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending