Connect with us

Idaho

Idaho Judges Won't Tolerate Petty & Spiteful Neighbor Behavior

Published

on

Idaho Judges Won't Tolerate Petty & Spiteful Neighbor Behavior


Loving thy Idaho neighbor isn’t always easy.

Okay, The Bible left Idaho out of the 10 Commandments, but you get the point. Sometimes, despite your best efforts and intentions, the folks you share a property line with make the Manson family seem less horrible. And it happens more often than we realized.

A  2023 Lending Tree report shows a significant percentage of Americans don’t have the warm and fuzzies for the family next door.

Although 70% of Americans with neighbors report being friends with at least some of them, 24% of all Americans say they dislike at least one. Among those who dislike a neighbor, 48% say it’s because they’re unfriendly or rude, 31% say they make too much noise and 29% say the neighbor is too nosy.

-Lending Tree

Mo’ fences, mo’ problems. 

Like money became the bane of Notorious B.I.G.’s short-lived gangsta existence, erecting a structure to block your neighbors’ view just to p*ss them off could become yours. 

Advertisement

Idaho judges know better than anyone that fencing yourself off from your neighbors could have unintended consequences. That’s because they’re the ones who get stuck dealing with them.

Sort of like parents who are sick and tired of their kids arguing over the remote, Idaho judges are over petty residential B.S.

Ever heard of a spite fence?

If you haven’t, context clues are all you need to crack the code, y’all.

Fences, property lines, and trees have been the progenitors of so many state legal battles, they spurred an entire section of Idaho code that addresses “spite structures.” Take a look …

If adjoining proprietors cannot agree as to the proportion or the particular part of a division fence to be made, maintained or kept in repair by each respectively, either party may apply, on five (5) days’ notice, to a magistrate judge, for the appointment of three (3) viewers, who may examine witnesses on oath, and view the premises […].

-Idaho Code 35-106

Advertisement

Put another, Biblical’esque way, “Thou shall not be an @$$#ole neighbor.”

FYI: the burden of proof falls on the spite fence-pitcher.

In the end, spite might come back and bite you in the you-know-what.

If you get dragged into court by your neighbor who took issue with your 12-foot-high fence, FindLaw says it’s on you to prove your motive wasn’t spiteful. If you fail to convince the judge, you could be required to remove or modify the fence.

And while you’re at it, you might want to consider therapy, spiteful one 😳

Keep scrolling for…

  • 14 controversial Idaho gun laws anti-gun people hate

  • Shocking sex offender laws in Idaho, California & Utah

  • 4 ways Idaho break-ups can end in a lawsuit

  • Boise’s 7 most forgotten/blown-off road rules

14 Controversial Idaho Gun Laws Anti-Gun People Hate

Gallery Credit: Ryan Antoinette Valenzuela

Shocking Sex Offender Laws in Idaho, California and 6 Other States

⚠️ Scroll for a recap on the most important sex offender laws in Idaho, California, Washington, Utah, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, and Oregon.

Advertisement

Gallery Credit: Ryan Antoinette Valenzuela

4 Ways Idaho Breakups Can Lead to a Lawsuit

Gallery Credit: Ryan Antoinette Valenzuela

Boise’s 7 Most Blown-Off & Forgotten Traffic Laws

Gallery Credit: Ryan Valenzuela





Source link

Advertisement

Idaho

Idaho is home to the nation's first DarkSky Reserve. Now it's home to the nations first DarkSky Certified Resort

Published

on

Idaho is home to the nation's first DarkSky Reserve. Now it's home to the nations first DarkSky Certified Resort


Photo: Courtesy Sun Valley Resort Idaho is already home to the nation’s first DarkSky Reserve. Now, Sun Valley Resort is adding another first. The resort has become the first in the United States to earn DarkSky Certified Resort status through DarkSky International’s Approved Lodging Program, recognizing the resort’s efforts to reduce light pollution and protect […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Falls City Council delays vote on proposed alcohol ordinance – Local News 8

Published

on

Idaho Falls City Council delays vote on proposed alcohol ordinance – Local News 8


IDAHO FALLS, Idaho (KIFI) – A controversy is brewing as the City of Idaho Falls reviews its alcohol ordinance.

The goal is to consolidate four existing ordinances for beer, wine and liquor into a single law and ensure compliance with state code.

However, at its meeting last Thursday, the Idaho Falls City Council unanimously voted to remove the proposed ordinance from its agenda, in order to receive and consider additional public comment.

The proposed ordinance would:

Advertisement

1. Require commercial establishments selling, dispensing or permitting consumption of alcohol – including beer, wine or liquor – to have an alcohol license, alcohol catering permit or a charitable event permit.

2. Business events with 20 or less employees consuming alcohol at the business would be allowed.

3. Require alcohol servers to complete training every three years.

4. Individuals who violate the law could be charged with a misdemeanor.

Idaho Falls City Council President Jim Francis said the changes were the culmination of months of collaboration between law enforcement, business owners and city attorneys.

Advertisement

“We wanted to provide a safe environment – the primary point here – for public gatherings,” Francis said. “We recognize that certain antiquated elements of the current code are overly restrictive and needed to be addressed. We wanted to make the code more accessible to the public. We needed to address over-pouring issues. We wanted to reduce penalties where possible for violations, particularly the first offenses, and yet make the code clear enough to be enforceable consistently by law enforcement.”

But City Council Member John Radford said the changes represent an overreach by city government.

“I believe it’s a bad policy. What problem are we solving in the name of trying to solve a non-problem?” Radford said. “We’re becoming big brother around alcohol in your private property. I’m concerned that landlords will be at risk of being charged with a misdemeanor if they knowingly, which I made sure that was in there, because that is what we’ve been talking about, allowed people to drink in our business. We will be outside the norm of Idaho cities. This is a big step, and I don’t think the public has weighed in on this.”

At a City Council Work Session on June 1, Idaho Falls Chief of Police Bryce Johnson cited an increase in alcohol-related crime – particularly downtown – as a reason for the changes.

“DUI is there, but this would include sexual assaults, assaults, batteries, disturbances, urination, public vandalism, shooting – all sorts of crimes,” Johnson said.

Advertisement

But business owners are concerned about the potential impact on commercial enterprises.

“The ordinance doesn’t address the real problem – which is people drinking … at one event and then showing up in a bar or restaurant already hammered and causing problems anyway,” ” said Terri Ireland, representing the Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association. “The industry is really well-regulated by state and local laws already.”

The City of Idaho Falls began the process of updating its alcohol ordinance in January 2026, seeking input from community stakeholders.

Multiple community members spoke out about the ordinance.

For more in-depth information, you can read the full 39-page proposed alcohol ordinance here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho attorneys rebuff DOJ threat to prosecute Secretary of State in voter roll dispute

Published

on

Idaho attorneys rebuff DOJ threat to prosecute Secretary of State in voter roll dispute


A simmering dispute between Idaho’s top elections official and the U.S. Department of Justice escalated this month after federal officials warned Secretary of State Phil McGrane about possible prosecution tied to non-citizens voting in Idaho.

The Justice Department sent a letter earlier this month threatening McGrane with prosecution. The warning came amid a broader conflict between the Trump administration and McGrane, whom the administration has sued over his refusal to provide unredacted voter rolls to the federal government.

Idaho’s chief of civil litigation, James Craig, responded on July 10. In a letter first reported by the Idaho Statesman, Craig pushed back on the federal warning, writing, “Insinuations of criminal violations of the federal election laws are not well taken,” and asking the department to “stop threatening your friends in Idaho.”

Craig also requested that the lawsuit against McGrane be dismissed and criticized the Justice Department for sending its letter directly to McGrane rather than to the Idaho attorney general’s office.

Advertisement

The attorney general’s office said the state has already referred 15 cases of possible non-citizen election violations to the Justice Department but is not aware of any of them being prosecuted. Craig’s letter ends by asking the department to do so.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending