Connect with us

Maine

We spent months examining Maine’s juvenile justice system. Here’s what we learned.

Published

on

We spent months examining Maine’s juvenile justice system. Here’s what we learned.


Stories of violence, understaffing and dysfunction at Long Creek Youth Development Center in South Portland have spilled into the public eye for years now.

But over the past year, the Bangor Daily News chronicled the sprawling problems in Maine’s juvenile justice system that reach beyond the walls of its only youth prison, seeking to answer some of the most urgent questions that matter to families, youth and their communities.

For example, what has been the impact of reducing Long Creek’s population without making comparable strides to expand community-based programs? Who are the young people involved in the juvenile justice system, and what are their lives like?

Some of the most important stories illustrate Maine’s broader struggle to protect and support its most troubled, vulnerable kids while keeping the public safe. They also shine a light on those trying to help.

Advertisement

Sprawling problems with no clear plan to address them

In February, the BDN examined, in partnership with The New York Times, how little progress state officials had made to fix a shortage of intervention programs for adolescents in the juvenile justice system while the state had continued to divert as many kids from Long Creek as possible.

Law enforcement, parents, advocates and teenagers described the dire consequences of how Maine’s all-or-nothing system of juvenile justice offered limited help to kids who were spiraling out of control but not considered dangerous enough for Long Creek. For example, some families and police officers felt as though they had nowhere to bring a child in the throes of a dangerous episode but the local emergency department, transforming hospitals into “new forms of detention.”

State leaders, meanwhile, had failed to come up with a comprehensive plan for solving that crisis, despite years of state commissioned reports, task forces, legislative efforts and advocacy that urged leaders to overhaul the juvenile system.

Geographic disparities 

A first-of-its kind analysis conducted by the BDN, The New York Times and Stanford University’s Big Local News found that adolescents face harsher outcomes in the juvenile justice system depending on where they live across Maine’s vast geography. The examination of corrections and prosecutorial data showed that Aroostook County committed nearly twice as many adolescents to Long Creek over a five-year period than the more populous York County.

The disparity appeared to stem from philosophical differences over the appropriate response to teenagers who got in trouble, the varying availability of services across the state, and the unequal distribution of lawyers and caseloads, according to interviews with defense lawyers, law enforcement officials and former corrections officials.

Advertisement

One retired district county judge from Fort Kent lamented that the commitments he ordered “always had to do with either a lack of available resources or a secure home for people who were seriously out of control.” In some cases, “it was a matter of preservation — to keep them alive,” he said.

The crisis through one boy’s coming of age

Austin is pictured at his mother’s apartment in Brewer on his 18th birthday. Credit: Linda Coan O’Kresik / BDN

The BDN stayed in touch with 17-year-old Austin during his final year as a teenager to give readers a close-up look at one boy’s life in the juvenile justice system.

His story, published Oct. 2, illustrated the constellation of traumas, unmet needs and struggling governmental systems that so often pave the way for kids into the juvenile justice system and Long Creek. That was true even for a teenager like Austin who encountered more than one adult who tried to help him beat the odds.

Signs of hope on the local level

In late 2022, the city of Rockland became known for problems in the juvenile justice system after its police chief publicly criticized the state for providing insufficient services to support troubled teens in the community. The department felt unable to handle a spike in juvenile crime, often involving the same kids over and over again.

But then over two years, community members in the midcoast banded together around a local strategy for supporting kids and teenagers, with a major emphasis on preventing them from getting into trouble in the first place.

Advertisement
School buses line up at the end of the day in front of Oceanside Middle School in Thomaston, Maine in May. Credit: Linda Coan O’Kresik / BDN

Reported in real time over the course of a year, the BDN documented how local police officers, nurses, educators and social workers nurtured experimental ideas into full-blown, grassroots organizations and major federal grants — and how that work could only go so far without greater support.

“I can only work 100 hours a week for so much longer,” one educator leading the work said.

Long Creek had another hard year

Chronic short-staffing and limited programming has brought waves of unrest to Long Creek over the years, including this past winter. During one tumultuous night in January, the BDN reported that a group of boys broke out of the prison — an episode that came days before staff at the prison sent a letter to state corrections officials pleading for help and describing the facility as in crisis. Months later, in July, two boys escaped by jumping from the prison’s roof.

Federal lawsuit brought hope for long-awaited change

The state of Maine and the federal government reached a court-supervised settlement agreement last month to expand children’s mental health services.

The U.S. Department of Justice had sued Maine in September over a pattern of unnecessarily institutionalizing children with behavioral health challenges, including at Long Creek, due to the state’s shortage of community-based services.

Advertisement

The terms of the settlement “will mean more kids who will be able to stay at home and in their communities, more children who will be moved out of detention facilities, and more children who will be less likely to get trapped in the juvenile justice system,” said Kristen Clarke, the assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, in an interview with the BDN following the announcement.

Advocates expressed cautious optimism over the decision, knowing it could take years to see changes.

Reporter Callie Ferguson may be reached at cferguson@bangordailynews.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Janet Mills welcomes suspension of tariffs on Canada but says chaos harms Maine's economy

Published

on

Janet Mills welcomes suspension of tariffs on Canada but says chaos harms Maine's economy


Gov. Janet Mills welcomed news Thursday afternoon that President Donald Trump has suspended tariffs on many goods imported from Canada.

But Mills says the economic uncertainty caused by Trump’s on-again, off-again trade policy is already harming Maine residents and businesses. And it remained unclear Thursday evening whether certain Canadian exports that are important to Maine’s economy, such as gas and heating oil, are exempt under the new plan.

Trump reversed course less than 48 hours after his administration imposed 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico. The president announced that goods covered under an existing trade pact, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement or USMCA, will not be subject to tariffs at least until April 2.

“The president’s broad tariffs on our major trading partners will increase prices for Maine people and businesses and cause havoc to our economy,” Mills said in a statement on Thursday. “While today’s temporary tariff reprieves are welcome, they are creating significant economic uncertainty that is also damaging to our people, businesses, and our economy. I urge the president to stop his pursuit of these unnecessary tariffs and focus on fulfilling his campaign commitment to lower the prices of eggs, bread, heat, housing, and cars.”

Advertisement

The short-lived tariffs on Mexican and Canadian imports rattled the financial markets and caused alarms on both sides of the border, including in Maine.

Mills and most members of Maine’s congressional delegation had strongly opposed the tariffs on Canada because the state’s economy is interwoven with its provincial neighbors. They predicted that tariffs on Canadian goods — combined with reciprocal tariffs from Canada on U.S.-made products — will only harm Maine consumers, households and businesses that operate on both sides of the border, such as those in the forest products and commercial fishing industries.

There were also growing concerns about the impact on tourism. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau drove that message home earlier this week when he predicted that some citizens of his country will opt not to visit Canadian vacation hotspots like Old Orchard Beach this year.

Canada is Maine’s largest trading partner, by far, accounting for more than $6 billion in cross-border trade last year. Maine imported more than $4.7 billion in Canadian goods last year and exported nearly $1.3 billion in products to Canada.

Maine is particularly reliant on Canada for gasoline and heating oil, which would have been subject to a 10% tariff under Trump’s original plan. More than 80% of the refined petroleum products consumed in Maine come from Canada.

Advertisement

But it was unclear immediately following Trump’s announcement whether Canadian petroleum products would still be subject to additional import levies despite the suspension on other tariffs.

The Associated Press reported that roughly 62% of imports from Canada would still face tariffs because they are not covered by the USMCA, according to a White House official who briefed reporters. The New York Times, meanwhile, reported that the White House official said Canadian oil was not typically covered by the earlier trade agreement and would, therefore, still be subject to a 10% tariff. Canadian power plants also sell electricity to parts of Maine and to the New England power grid.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

One person killed, 4 others injured in overnight fire in Portland, Maine

Published

on

One person killed, 4 others injured in overnight fire in Portland, Maine

One person died and four others were injured in a house fire overnight in Portland, Maine.

Firefighters responded to the home at 11 Olympia St. shortly after 1 a.m. Thursday, according to officials. Five adults lived at the home, and all of them were inside when the blaze broke out.

One person was killed, and the other four were taken to Maine Medical Center, News Center Maine reported. One of them was in serious condition, fire officials said, and no update on the other three was immediately available.

The fire does not appear suspicious, Portland Fire Chief Chad Johnson said, but he said the cause is not yet known.

Veranda Street in the area of the fire was closed to traffic for several hours overnight, reopening around 5 a.m. Olympia Street remained closed as of Thursday morning.

Advertisement

No further details were immediately available.

Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Bill aims to enshrine equal rights for all in Maine constitution

Published

on

Bill aims to enshrine equal rights for all in Maine constitution


AUGUSTA, Maine – At the state house on Tuesday, lawmakers gathered in the judiciary committee for a pubic hearing on LD 260, “Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of Maine to Establish That All Maine Residents Have Equal Rights Under the Law.”

Equal Rights for all is already engrained in Maine state law, but this new bill would add those protections to our Maine state constitution.

This resolution proposes to amend the Constitution of Maine to prohibit the denial or abridgment by the State or any political subdivision of the State of equal rights based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, physical or mental disability, ancestry or national origin of an individual.

Those opposed to the bill say it could give certain groups of people unfair privileges, while sponsors of the bill say their goal is to protect the rights of all Mainers.

Advertisement

This equal rights bill was submitted back in January.

In February, Governor Janet Mills and President Donald Trump got into a spat over policy on trans athletes.

Bill sponsor and Democratic State Representative, Holly Sargent says she does not believe this bill would exacerbate the threat to withhold federal funding made by the President, adding, “This is about fundamental human rights for all humans and everyone is included under that umbrella.”

Republican State Representative, Jennifer Poirier, says the bill could exacerbate the situation, adding, “This bill would affirm what Governor Mills has been actively fighting against our President on and I think it puts us in a dangerous position.”

Democratic bill sponsors are hoping for bipartisan support on LD 260, but at this point no republicans are backing the bill.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending