Connect with us

News

BBC’s flagship soccer show boycotted over Gary Lineker impartiality row | CNN

Published

on

BBC’s flagship soccer show boycotted over Gary Lineker impartiality row | CNN



CNN
 — 

The BBC’s weekend soccer protection has been plunged into chaos following its announcement that Gary Lineker would “step again” from presenting, after he turned embroiled in an impartiality row when he criticized British authorities coverage on Twitter.

The broadcaster now faces a boycott from pundits, presenters and even gamers of its flagship soccer present “Match of the Day,” whereas different soccer packages – Soccer Focus and Remaining Rating – and a few radio programming have been pressured off air because of the furore.

Lineker criticized the federal government’s controversial new asylum seeker coverage on Tuesday and was subsequently stepped down from his presenting duties this week for the reason that BBC stated his tweets breached their tips, particularly its dedication to “due impartiality.”

The BBC’s determination has sparked controversy, leaving the group underneath hearth from opposition politicians, the BECTU union who characterize BBC employees, and its former director common Greg Dyke.

Advertisement

“The BBC will solely be capable of convey restricted sport programming this weekend and our schedules might be up to date to mirror that,” a BBC spokesperson stated in a press release Saturday.

“We’re sorry for these adjustments which we acknowledge might be disappointing for BBC sport followers.

“We’re working exhausting to resolve the scenario and hope to take action quickly.”

On Tuesday, Lineker tweeted “Good heavens, that is past terrible” to a video posted on Twitter by the British Dwelling Workplace saying the brand new proposed coverage – an try to cease migrant boats crossing the English Channel from France which has been criticized by the United Nations and different world our bodies.

He added: “There isn’t a large inflow. We take far fewer refugees than different main European nations. That is simply an immeasurably merciless coverage directed on the most susceptible individuals in language that isn’t dissimilar to that utilized by Germany within the 30s, and I’m out of order?”

Advertisement

As Britain’s public broadcaster, the BBC is sure by “due impartiality” – a a lot debated time period which the group defines as holding “energy to account with consistency” whereas not “permitting ourselves for use to marketing campaign to alter public coverage.”

On Friday, the BBC introduced that Lineker would “step again from presenting Match of the Day till we’ve obtained an agreed and clear place on his use of social media,” including that it thought-about his latest social media exercise to breach its tips.

In response, first pundits, then commentators, after which even Premier League groups introduced their intention to boycott the present in help of Lineker.

BBC commentators Steve Wilson, Conor McNamara, Robyn Cowen and Steven Wyeth stated in a joint assertion issued late on Friday that “within the circumstances, we don’t really feel it will be acceptable to participate within the programme.”

Advertisement

Jermain Defoe, a former England striker, introduced Saturday he wouldn’t seem as a pundit on the Sunday present.

“It’s at all times such a privilege to work with BBC MOTD. However tomorrow I’ve taken the choice to face down from my punditry duties. @GaryLineker,” Defoe tweeted.

Defoe’s announcement seems to be the primary signal that the British broadcaster’s Sunday tv programming may also be affected.

In the meantime, the Skilled Footballers’ Affiliation announced on Saturday that “gamers concerned in at this time’s video games won’t be requested to take part in interviews with Match of the Day.”

“The PFA have been talking to members who needed take a collective place and to have the ability to present their help for many who have chosen to not be a part of tonight’s programme,” the assertion added.

Advertisement

“Throughout these conversations we made clear that, as their union, we’d help all members who may face penalties for selecting to not full their broadcast commitments. It is a frequent sense determination that ensures gamers received’t now be put in that place.”

Following his aspect’s 1-0 defeat in opposition to Bournemouth on Saturday, Liverpool supervisor Jurgen Klopp was requested in regards to the BBC subject.

“I can not see any purpose why they might ask anybody to step again for saying that. I’m unsure if that’s a language subject or not,” the German advised reporters.

“If I perceive it proper, then that is about an opinion about human rights and that must be potential to say.

“What I don’t perceive is why everyone goes on Twitter and says one thing. I don’t perceive the social media a part of it however that’s in all probability [because] I’m too outdated for that.”

Advertisement

The BBC’s former director common Greg Dyke stated that the broadcaster has “undermined its personal credibility” by suspending Lineker as a result of it appeared prefer it had “bowed to authorities strain.”

Keir Starmer, chief of the opposition Labour Get together, stated that the BBC had obtained “this one badly incorrect and now they’re very, very uncovered.”

Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon tweeted: “As a powerful supporter of public service broadcasting, I need to have the ability to defend the BBC. However the determination to take Gary Lineker off air is indefensible. It’s undermining free speech within the face of political strain – & it does at all times appear to be rightwing strain it caves to.”

Opposition Labour Get together deputy chief Angela Rayner additionally lambasted the BBC’s determination in a tweet on Saturday.

“The BBC’s cowardly determination to take Gary Lineker off air is an assault on free speech within the face of political strain from Tory politicians. They need to rethink,” she tweeted.

Advertisement

In the meantime Nadine Dorries, an MP with the governing Conservative social gathering and former Tradition Secretary, welcomed the BBC’s determination, tweeting: “Information that Gary Lineker has been stood down for investigation is welcome and exhibits BBC are critical about impartiality.

“Gary is entitled to his views – free speech is paramount. Numerous non Public Service Broadcasters can accommodate him and his views and he could be higher paid.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Humza Yousaf considers quitting as Scotland’s first minister ahead of no-confidence votes

Published

on

Humza Yousaf considers quitting as Scotland’s first minister ahead of no-confidence votes

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Scotland’s beleaguered first minister Humza Yousaf is considering quitting ahead of crunch votes of no confidence expected this week.

Yousaf, who faces two attempts to bring down his premiership and government, is set to decide whether to resign on Monday, according to one person briefed on the matter.

Over the weekend, the Scottish National party leader’s team has been considering options to win enough support to be able to carry on as a minority government.

Advertisement

Senior SNP figures have been holding talks with the Scottish Greens, Yousaf’s erstwhile coalition partners whom he booted out of government last week, triggering the current political crisis.

On Monday morning Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “I don’t think there is anything that Humza Yousaf will be able to say that can restore the trust that he has broken.”

The SNP has 63 Holyrood seats, versus 65 for opposition parties. Yousaf would need to persuade one opposition MSP to vote for him and his government in no confidence motions to secure his position.

Yousaf has also been considering seeking support from Ash Regan, the sole MSP from rival nationalist party Alba, led by former first minister Alex Salmond. But the SNP has ruled out the notion of a formal pact with Alba.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Missing teen of Slack co-founder, found in van with man, 26, now facing kidnapping charges

Published

on

Missing teen of Slack co-founder, found in van with man, 26, now facing kidnapping charges

Mint Butterfield, the missing child of Slack’s co-founder, was found in San Francisco Saturday night with an adult man a decade older who is now facing kidnapping charges.

The 16-year-old was found alongside Christopher “Kio” Dizefalo, 26, according to the Marin County Sheriff’s Office after the teen, who is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns, disappeared from their Bolinas home last week.

Dizefalo, described by the sheriff as an “adult friend,” was arrested and booked at Marin County Jail on suspicion of child abduction and other violations, arrest records obtained by the San Francisco Standard. He was being held on $50,000 bail.

Mint Butterfield was last seen the night of April 21 in Bolinas and was reported missing by their mother the next morning.  Marin County Sheriff’s Office

The parking valet was found with Mint inside his white van on Eddy Street in the city’s notoriously dangerous Tenderloin District neighborhood, booking records said.

Mint — who was deemed “at-risk” due to previous threats of suicide — was uninjured. 

Advertisement

They told detectives that they’d voluntarily run away from home in Bolinas and have since been reunited with their family.

Dizefalo, however, is suspected of coaxing the teen to run away, the Standard reported.

Mint’s parents, Stewart Butterfield — who co-founded the instant messaging app Slack before selling it to Salesforce in 2020 — and Caterina Fake — who co-founded the photo-sharing app Flickr, thanked investigators for bringing their child home.

Slack Technologies Inc. co-founder Stewart Butterfield. REUTERS
Cofounder of Hunch Caterina Fake attends the Wired business conference in partnership with MDC Partners at The Morgan Library & Museum on June 14, 2010, in New York City. Larry Busacca

“A heartfelt thanks to all the family, friends, volunteers and strangers who called in tips and made this recovery possible,” their parents and stepfather, fellow tech founder Jyri Engeström, said in an email to the Standard and other local outlets. “We especially want to thank the seasoned law enforcement officers who understand the very real threat of predators who use the allure of drugs to groom teenagers.”

Mint was last seen the night of April 21 in Bolinas and was reported missing by their mother the next morning. 

Advertisement

The teen allegedly left a note indicating to their parents that they’d had the intention of running away before they were found with Dizefalo this week.

Authorities believed that Mint had been in the Tenderloin neighborhood because they were known to frequent the area before running away from home, police confirmed.

Continue Reading

News

Western banks in Russia paid €800mn in taxes to Kremlin last year

Published

on

Western banks in Russia paid €800mn in taxes to Kremlin last year

The largest western banks that remain in Russia paid the Kremlin more than €800mn of taxes last year, a fourfold increase on prewar levels, despite promises to minimise their Russian exposure after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The seven top European banks by assets in Russia — Raiffeisen Bank International, UniCredit, ING, Commerzbank, Deutsche Bank, Intesa Sanpaolo and OTP — reported a combined profit of more than €3bn in 2023.

Those profits were three times more than in 2021 and were partly generated by funds that the banks cannot withdraw from the country.

The jump in profitability resulted in the European banks paying about €800mn in tax, up from €200mn in 2021, an analysis by the Financial Times shows. It came in addition to profits at US lenders such as Citigroup and JPMorgan.

The taxes paid by European banks, equivalent to about 0.4 per cent of all Russia’s expected non-energy budget revenues for 2024, are an example of how foreign companies remaining in the country help the Kremlin maintain financial stability despite western sanctions.

Advertisement

The foreign lenders have benefited not just from higher interest rates but also from international sanctions on Russian banks. Such measures have deprived their rivals’ access to international payments systems and increased western banks’ own appeal to clients in the country.

More than half of the European banks’ €800mn tax payments correspond to Austria’s Raiffeisen Bank International, which has the largest presence in Russia of the foreign lenders.

RBI’s Russian profits more than tripled to €1.8bn between 2021 and 2023, accounting for half of the Austrian group’s total profit, compared with about a third before the war.

In addition to regular tax contributions in 2023, Raiffeisen paid €47mn as the result of a windfall levy the Kremlin imposed on some companies last year.

After President Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, RBI repeatedly voiced its plan to downsize and divest its operations in Russia. It has faced persistent criticism from the European Central Bank and the US Treasury department for not yet completing the withdrawal.

Advertisement

Although RBI has made some efforts to reduce its Russian exposure — such as a 56 per cent decrease in its loan book since early 2022 — some measures point to the contrary.

Recent job postings by RBI in Russia suggest ambitious plans for “multiple expansion of the active client base”, the FT has reported.

Deutsche Bank, Hungary’s OTP and Commerzbank had significantly reduced their presence in Russia, which was already small compared with RBI, their representatives said. Intesa is the closest to exiting but has yet to sell its Russian business. UniCredit declined to comment.

Despite closing its corporate and retail business, Citigroup, the US’s fourth-largest lender, which earned $149mn profit and paid $53mn in Russia in 2023, became the fourth-biggest taxpayer among western banks in Russia, according to the Kyiv School of Economics’ calculations based on Russian Central Bank data.

Another American giant, JPMorgan, earned $35mn and paid $6.8mn in taxes, according to the research institution.

Advertisement

JPMorgan, once the main contractor of Russian banks for opening correspondent accounts in US dollars, has been trying to leave since 2022. The bank is now stuck and facing a multimillion-dollar lawsuit from its former partner in Russia, VTB.

The US banks’ figures are not included in the €800mn total as they do not report comparable Russian results on the group accounts used for the FT calculations.

Western lenders have benefited from the imposition of sanctions on most of the Russian financial sector, which has denied access to the Swift international interbank payment system. That made international banks a financial lifeline between Moscow and the west.

Such factors contributed to RBI’s net fee and commission income in Russia increasing threefold from €420mn in 2021 to €1.2bn in 2023.

“It is not only in RBI’s interest to stay in Russia. The [Russian central bank] will do everything it can to not let them go because there are few non-sanctioned banks through which Russia can receive and send Swift payments,” a senior Russian banking executive said.

Advertisement

The central bank did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

According to the executive, Russian and foreign counterparties now often settle cross-border payments in roubles, but the Russian currency also goes through accounts at RBI and similar banks “to reduce sanctions risk” and “speed up the process”.

The international banks’ combined revenue, profit and tax figures have fallen since 2022 but remain much higher than prewar results.

The banks have also benefited from interest rate rises with the Russian central bank’s key rate now at 16 per cent, almost two times higher than before the war.

The rate increases have helped the lenders earn bumper revenues from their floating-rate loans and accumulate extra income from funds trapped in Russian deposit accounts.

Advertisement

The banks cannot access cash earned in Russia due to regulatory restrictions imposed in 2022 that prohibited dividend payouts from Russian subsidiaries to businesses from “unfriendly” western countries.

“We can’t do anything with Russian deposits apart from keeping them with the central bank. So as interest rates went up, so did our profits,” a senior executive at a European bank with a Russian subsidiary said.

About 20 per cent of the tax payments to the Russian budget in 2023 made by OTP consisted of taxes on dividends, the bank said. Much of its funds remain stuck in deposit accounts in Russia, it added.

Locked-up cash presents a significant obstacle to exiting Russia. Since early 2022 the banks have also required personal authorisation by President Vladimir Putin for the sale of their Russian operations.

Only seven western banks — out of 45 included in the list of those in need of presidential approval to exit — have received such an authorisation, including Mercedes-Benz Bank and Intesa.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending