Connect with us

Health

Sunlight exposure can pose life-changing health benefits, expert says

Published

on

Sunlight exposure can pose life-changing health benefits, expert says

As spring arrives and the weather warms, exposure to sunlight could have an immense impact on overall health.

Dr. Roger Seheult, a critical care physician, pulmonologist and associate clinical professor at the University of California and Loma Linda University schools of medicine, shared the benefits of sunlight exposure in an interview with Fox News Digital.

Seheult, who recently appeared on Dr. Andrew Huberman’s podcast Huberman Lab to discuss enhancing the immune system, noted that the light from the sun boosts our ability to regulate sleep, circadian rhythm and mood.

BOOST YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM WITH THESE 8 SIMPLE STEPS 

“So many people have seasonal affective disorder, and that’s a manifestation of the lack of sunlight during winter,” he said.

Advertisement

Children with tuberculosis were put into an outdoor solarium for periods of rest in 1946. This sanitarium accommodated 200 patients ranging from infants to 20-year-olds. (Alamy)

Sunlight’s healing properties

As far back as the 1920s, medical professionals leveraged light exposure to promote healing.

Hospitals made use of sundecks, where patients could be transported for periods of time to take in the sunlight and fresh air, according to Seheult.

JUST ONE NIGHT OF POOR SLEEP COULD HAVE THESE SURPRISING HEALTH EFFECTS

But then with the development of pencillin and other advancements in modern medicine, doctors relied less on holistic methods, he said.

Advertisement

The sun’s ultraviolet B (UV-B) light produces vitamin D in the body by causing a chemical reaction in the skin, Seheult noted.

Couple in sunlight

Sunlight can boost the body’s ability to regulate sleep, circadian rhythm and mood. (iStock)

Vitamin D is a known anti-inflammatory and antioxidant that supports immune health, muscle and brain function, according to Mayo Clinic.

The sun also produces infrared light, which has been shown to relieve pain and inflammation.

Just 15 to 20 minutes of sunlight exposure can help boost the immune system and potentially even ward off chronic disease, according to Seheult.

Balancing risks and benefits

Warnings of sunlight leading to skin cancer may have caused decreased exposure, the doctor suggested.

Advertisement

“Certainly, if we go outside in the sun for too long for a period of time without protection, we can get those types of skin damage,” he said. 

“There are some benefits to getting out into the sun, if it’s done in moderation and if it’s done smartly.”

But the doctor revealed that some recent studies have found that the more time spent outside in sunlight, the less likely people are to die of all causes, including cancer.

Dr. Richard Weller, a professor of dermatology at the University of Edinburgh, published a piece in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology in August 2024, discussing this data and the need to rethink the influence of the sun.

Advertisement

“UVR is a skin carcinogen, yet no studies link sun exposure to increased all-cause mortality,” Weller wrote in the study abstract.

Rearview shot of a senior couple going for a walk in the park

Walking in green spaces can offer even more light exposure, as trees, leaves and plants are “highly reflective of infrared light.” (iStock)

“Growing evidence shows that sunlight has health benefits through vitamin D-independent pathways, such as photomobilization of nitric oxide from cutaneous stores with reduction in cardiovascular morbidity. Sunlight has important systemic health benefits as well as risks.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Seheult agreed, encouraging people to “rethink the idea that the sun is a deadly laser and that actually there are some benefits to getting out into the sun, if it’s done in moderation and if it’s done smartly.”

WHY THE END OF DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME CAN NEGATIVELY AFFECT YOUR HEALTH

Advertisement

People who are fair-skinned or sensitive to sunlight can wear clothing, hats and other protective gear while still getting the benefits.

“Infrared light, because it is a long-wavelength, low-energy light, is able to penetrate not only through your skin and deep down into your body, but it’s also able to penetrate very easily through clothes,” Seheult pointed out.

Man in sunglasses bonding with dog on a wooden bench.

Vitamin D from sunlight acts as an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant, helping to support immune health, muscle and brain function. (iStock)

“If they’re still getting outside, they’re going to get quite a bit of infrared light, even in that setting, and not be susceptible to getting [burned]. So, you don’t need to have bare skin for sunlight exposure.”

Sunlight is also still present on cloudy and rainy days and in urban areas, Seheult noted.

WHY HIGHER UV INDEX NUMBERS ARE MORE DANGEROUS DURING SUN EXPOSURE

Advertisement

“The amount of light inside a building [is] usually no more than 100 lux,” he said. “When you go outside on a bright, sunny day, that’s 100,000 lux. That’s 1,000 times brighter.”

Although that exposure will be reduced on cloudy days or in the winter, it won’t be “nearly as low” as indoor lighting, Sehuelt added.

Mother and daughter in a park touching leaves

“Kids are spending so much more time inside,” Seheult said. “Any sort of movement that we make toward going outside will be very beneficial.” (iStock)

To reap the benefits of infrared light without the risk, Seheult recommends going outside and covering up for about 30 minutes, even in the morning or evening while the sun is setting.

“These are times when there is an abundance of infrared light, far more than you would get inside your home,” he said.

“All it takes is about 15 to 20 minutes of infrared light exposure … and we’re seeing effects that last for days.”

Advertisement

For those who work in an office and spend their daylight hours inside, Seheult suggested taking short breaks and stepping outside into the light or a green space.

“All it takes is about 15 to 20 minutes of infrared light exposure at the level of the mitochondria, and we’re seeing effects that last for days,” he said.

Blend of holistic and modern methods

Seheult shared his hope for a balance between modern medicine — including advancements like medical-grade oxygen and antibiotics — and holistic health trends.

“There are definitely modern inventions and things that are very beneficial to the human body,” he said. “What I would like to do is incorporate both together.”

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

Advertisement

“There is a disadvantage to wholly depending on things that need and require supply chains, especially in pandemics,” he said. 

“The sunlight and fresh air … are not things that depend on supply chains. We have sunlight accessible most times of the year.”

Advertisement

Health

Study: Postmenopausal Women Lose More Weight With GLP-1 and HRT

Published

on

Study: Postmenopausal Women Lose More Weight With GLP-1 and HRT


Advertisement


Postmenopausal Women Lose More Weight With GLP-1 and HRT | Woman’s World




















Advertisement














Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.

Advertisement


Use escape to exit the menu.

Continue Reading

Health

Deadly cancer type linked to obesity and high stress levels

Published

on

Deadly cancer type linked to obesity and high stress levels

Obesity and stress could magnify the risk of one of the most aggressive types of cancer, a new study suggests.

Researchers at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) found that stress-related neurotransmitters and obesity-related hormones activated CREB (cyclic AMP response element-binding protein), which was shown to promote the growth of cancer cells in the pancreas.

In the study, mice that ate a high-fat diet were more likely to develop precancerous lesions. When stress levels were also raised through social isolation, the lesions grew even more.

EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE FOR COMMON CANCER SHOWS POTENTIAL IN CLINICAL TRIAL

The stress-related cancer risk was more pronounced in female mice.

Advertisement

Based on these findings, the researchers suggested exploring the use of existing medications to reduce the risk of obesity- and stress-related cancers. 

Obesity and stress could magnify the risk of one of the most aggressive types of cancer, a new study suggests. (iStock)

“Since β-adrenergic receptors play a crucial role in stress-related cancer growth, commonly used beta-blockers, which are drugs prescribed for high blood pressure, could be repurposed to help mitigate these effects,” a press release stated.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest types in the U.S., with a five-year survival rate of just 13%.

PANCREATIC CANCER PATIENT SURVIVAL DOUBLED WITH HIGH DOSE OF COMMON VITAMIN, STUDY FINDS

Advertisement

One of the biggest challenges with the disease is that it’s often detected at a late stage when the disease is already advanced, according to Dr. Robert Den, a radiation oncologist, professor of radiation oncology, and chief medical officer at Alpha Tau Medical in Israel.

“Unlike some other cancers, there are no effective early screening tools, so by the time a patient is diagnosed, treatment options are often limited,” Den, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital.

Woman getting diagnosis

“Unlike some other cancers, there are no effective early screening tools, so by the time a patient is diagnosed, treatment options are often limited.” (iStock)

The study reinforces the strong connection between the mind and body as it related to cancer development, Den said.

“Stress and its associated pathways can exacerbate disease progression, and we know that obesity fuels certain cancers, potentially impacting a patient’s response to treatment,” he said.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

“In this case, we’re seeing evidence that stress and obesity may contribute to the worsening of pancreatic cancer, which has major implications for both prevention and treatment strategies.”

Maintaining a heart-healthy diet and eating in moderation are essential, Den noted — not just for cancer prevention but for overall health. 

pancreatic cancer 3D rendering

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest types in the U.S., with a five-year survival rate of just 13%. (iStock)

“Exercise is particularly crucial in addressing both obesity and stress,” he said. “Staying active is not only beneficial for physical health, but also an excellent way to reduce stress.”

Mindfulness can also play a key role in reducing cancer risk, the doctor advised.

      

Advertisement

“Spending time outdoors can also improve both mental and physical well-being, so I always encourage patients to find ways to be active, connect with nature and prioritize their overall wellness,” he said.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

Regarding pancreatic cancer treatment, Den noted that there have been some advancements in chemotherapy and surgical techniques, but “there hasn’t yet been a breakthrough.”

“Most immunotherapies, which have been revolutionary in other cancers, have not shown the same promise in pancreatic cancer,” he said. 

People doing yoga

“Spending time outdoors can also improve both mental and physical well-being, so I always encourage patients to find ways to be active, connect with nature and prioritize their overall wellness,” an oncologist said. (iStock)

“The key challenge is finding ways to help patients who are not candidates for surgery, as surgery remains the best line of defense.”

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to the study researchers for comment.

Continue Reading

Health

History Isn’t Entirely Repeating Itself in Covid’s Aftermath

Published

on

History Isn’t Entirely Repeating Itself in Covid’s Aftermath

Five years after Covid-19 shut down activities all over the world, medical historians sometimes struggle to place the pandemic in context.

What, they are asking, should this ongoing viral threat be compared with?

Is Covid like the 1918 flu, terrifying when it was raging but soon relegated to the status of a long-ago nightmare?

Is it like polio, vanquished but leaving in its wake an injured but mostly unseen group of people who suffer long-term health consequences?

Or is it unique in the way it has spawned a widespread rejection of public health advice and science itself, attitudes that some fear may come to haunt the nation when the next major illness arises?

Advertisement

Some historians say it is all of the above, which makes Covid stand out in the annals of pandemics.


In many ways, historians say, the Covid pandemic — which the World Health Organization declared on March 11, 2020 reminds them of the 1918 flu. Both were terrifying, killing substantial percentages of the population, unlike, say, polio or Ebola or H.I.V., terrible as those illnesses were.

The 1918 flu killed 675,000 people out of a U.S. population of 103 million, or 65 out of every 10,000. Covid has so far killed about 1,135,000 Americans out of a population of 331.5 million, or 34 out of every 10,000.

Both pandemics dominated the news every day while they raged. And both were relegated to the back of most people’s minds as the numbers of infections and deaths fell.

J. Alexander Navarro, a medical historian at the University of Michigan, said that in the fall of 1918, when the nation was in the throes of the deadliest wave of the 1918 flu, “newspapers were chock-full of stories about influenza, detailing daily case tallies, death tolls, edicts and recommendations issued by officials.”

Advertisement

During the next year, the virus receded. And so did the nation’s attention.

There were no memorials for flu victims, no annual days of remembrance.

“The nation simply moved on,” Dr. Navarro said.

Much the same thing happened with Covid, historians say, although it took longer for the virus’s harshest effects to recede.

Most people live as though the threat is gone, with deaths a tiny fraction of what they once were.

Advertisement

In the week of Feb. 15, 273 Americans died of Covid. In the last week of 2021, 10,476 Americans died from Covid.

Interest in the Covid vaccine has plummeted, too. Now just “a measly 23 percent of adults” have gotten the updated vaccine, Dr. Navarro noted.

Remnants of Covid remain — lasting financial effects, lags in educational achievement, casual dress, Zoom meetings, a desire to work from home. But few think of Covid as they go about their daily lives.

Dora Vargha, a medical historian at the University of Exeter, noted that there had been no ongoing widespread effort to memorialize Covid deaths. Instead, with Covid, “people disappeared into hospitals and never came out.”

Now it is only their friends and families who remember.

Advertisement

Dr. Vargha called that response understandable. People, she said, do not want to be “dragged back” into memories of those Covid years.


But some, like those suffering from long Covid, can’t forget. In that sense, she sees parallels with other pandemics that, unlike the 1918 flu, left a swath of people who were permanently affected.

People who contracted paralytic polio in the 1950s described themselves to Dr. Vargha as “the dinosaurs,” reminders of the time before the vaccine, when the virus was killing or paralyzing children.

Every pandemic has its dinosaurs, she said. They are the Zika babies living with microcephaly. They are the people, often at the margins of society, who develop AIDS.They are the people who contract tuberculosis.

But despite the pleas from those who cannot forget Covid and who seek more research, more empathy, more attention, the more pervasive attitude is, “We don’t need to care anymore,” said Mary Fissell, a historian at Johns Hopkins University.

Advertisement

That sounds so callous, and yet, said Dr. Barron Lerner, a historian at NYU Langone Health, in the world of public health “there are always people who are left behind — damaged or still at risk.”

“It’s hurtful” for people to be shunted aside, Dr. Lerner said. “Their lives are altered. The attention you feel their situation warrants is downplayed.”

But, he added, “on a realistic basis, there are any number of things to study.” Resources are limited, he noted, adding, “it can make sense to move on.”


One aspect of the Covid pandemic, though, is still with the nation, and seems to be part of a new reality: It has markedly changed attitudes toward public health.

Kyle Harper, a historian at the University of Oklahoma, said he would give the biomedical response to Covid an A-plus. “The rollout of vaccines was incredible,” he said.

Advertisement

But, he said, “I would give the social response a C-minus.”

Dr. Lerner had the same thought.

Few medical experts, he said, expected so much resistance to measures like masks, quarantines, social distancing and — when they became available — vaccines and vaccine mandates.

With Covid, he said, “compared to other pandemics, the amount of pushback to standard public health practices was remarkable.”

“That sets Covid apart,” he said. Public health measures that had worked in the past were rejected.

Advertisement

Some of the pushback was reasonable, he said, like objections to wearing masks outdoors. But the spurning of public health measures was widespread and politicized.

Dr. Navarro agreed and said the contrast with 1918 was striking.

“In 1918, there was an abiding respect for science and medicine that seems lacking today,” he said. There were pockets of resistance to measures like masking and avoiding large groups. But for the most part, he said, people complied with public health advice. And compliance was divorced from politics.

World War I also played a role in the messaging, Dr. Navarro said, which may have bolstered adherence.

“Public health orders and recommendations often purposely used the same language that was used to drum up support for the war effort,” Dr. Navarro said. The authorities, for example, asked people “to cover their coughs and sneezes so as not to gas their fellow citizens as the doughboys were being gassed by the Germans.”

Advertisement

Dr. Lerner contrasted the Covid response to the response to the polio vaccine.

The polio vaccine underwent preliminary testing, and then widespread testing, in the 1950s, with broad public acceptance.

With Covid, “faith in the scientific process got lost,” Dr. Lerner said.

That does not bode well for the next pandemic, Dr. Harper said.

“There’s going to be another pandemic,” he said. “And if we have to fight it without public trust, that’s the worst possible response.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending