Connect with us

Finance

The true cost of being cancelled: Stars face financial ruin after being embroiled in scandal – but who has a buffer of cash and assets to fall back on if they never work again?

Published

on

The true cost of being cancelled: Stars face financial ruin after being embroiled in scandal – but who has a buffer of cash and assets to fall back on if they never work again?

Cancel culture is now so virulent and dangerous that stars are even buying insurance to protect themselves from financial and reputational ruin.

And no wonder, because MailOnline can today reveal how stars such as Phillip Schofield are losing millions each year after being sent into the celebrity wilderness.

One star whose work has dried up amid allegations of sexual impropriety claims to be £10million worse off – with just £320 left in one business, down from £432,583.

Exclusive analysis of publicly-available company accounts reveal how stars’ earnings have fallen off a cliff since leaving the public eye due to various scandals.

Mr Schofield’s long career means that while his gigantic earnings from This Morning, Dancing on Ice and advertising deals have vanished, he still enjoys the cushion of millions of pounds in cash and assets including several properties.

Advertisement

Gino D’Acampo has built up a nest egg of around £6million from his ITV work and book deals over the past five years – but with no new shows on the way his earnings will take a hit of around £1million-a-year if the work runs out.

And for fallen stars like Gregg Wallace and Wynne Evans, their financial future could be bleak unless they can get their own careers back on track, especially without the comfort blanket of a BBC salary.

Noel Clarke, who was cancelled in 2021 and is fighting for his reputation in the High Court in a high-profile libel case with The Guardian newspaper, faces near-complete financial ruin if he loses the case.

Phillip Schofield is losing an estimated £1.4 million-a-year since quitting his job as This Morning presenter in June 2023.

The star, 62, left the show having admitted to having an affair with a junior colleague and then quit ITV altogether, leaving behind a host of well-paid presenting gigs.

Advertisement

He was earning £730,000 for the This Morning presenter role with Holly Willoughby but also picked up a reported £45,000 an episode for Dancing on Ice, which runs for 10 episodes per year.

Presenting other shows like British Soap Awards, BBC game show The Cube, and an ITV series called How To Spend It Well all added to his lucrative annual earnings.

Away from the screen, Schofield has built up a cache of valuable assets, including properties.

Schofield admitted to a relationship with a much younger male colleague (pictured centre) and having lied about it to bosses – as well as his loved ones

Advertisement
Phillip and Stephanie Lowe married in 1993 and raised two daughters, Molly, right, and Ruby, left. His daughters are also huge supporters - Molly is his publicist

Phillip and Stephanie Lowe married in 1993 and raised two daughters, Molly, right, and Ruby, left. His daughters are also huge supporters – Molly is his publicist

He sold a flat he was said to have used to entertain his lover for £1million last year, making a loss of £250,000 on what he paid for it.

He also owns a mansion in Henley-on-Thames outright, which is thought to be worth at least £5million.

In 2020 he picked up £1.2million for a book deal for his autobiography Life’s What You Make It.

Accounts for his two companies show they had assets of £3million in May 2023, soon after he quit This Morning. 

Advertisement

Fistral Productions, for his TV work, held £2.137million in the year he quit This Morning. His wife Stephanie Schofield is listed as a co-director.

He also has a company called Fistral Property, with assets of £900,000. Mrs Schofield is also a co-director.

Potential loss: £1.4 million-a-year 

Gino D’Acampo 

Gino D’Acampo has seen the value of his company rocket by an average of £979,000-a-year for the last five years and is now worth just under £6million.

But it means he could now stand to lose £1 million a year – or potentially more – if his career had continued to blossom at the same rate.

Advertisement

He lives in a £1.25million house in Hertfordshire, with wife Jessica, who is a director of his companies and the mother of his three children.

In February, ITV pulled all Gino D’Acampo’s shows from its upcoming schedules.

The TV chef, 48, has been accused of ‘sexually inappropriate’ behaviour spanning 12 years while filming his hit food and travel programmes. He denies the claims.

Mr D’Acampo has faced accusations including using sexualised and aggressive language on TV sets including ‘Gino’s Italian Express’, ‘Gordon, Gino and Fred’s Road Trip’ ‘Gino’s Italy: Secrets of South’, ‘Like Mamma Used to Make’ and ‘Emission Impossible’. 

ITV then changed its schedules to ensure he will not appear on our screens. But many of his shows remain available on its ITVX streaming service. 

Advertisement

The new series of Family Fortunes, the iconic family gameshow hosted by Gino, was due for broadcast in early 2025 but has also been canned by ITV. 

Gino is the host of Family Fortunes. Episodes have been pulled and the new series canned

Gino is the host of Family Fortunes. Episodes have been pulled and the new series canned

The Italian star (centre), 48, who regularly appeared on ITV's This Morning (pictured) when Schofield was a co-host, has been 'cancelled' following multiple allegations of sexually inappropriate and intimidating behaviour

Gino D’Acampo, pictured with Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield, honours his promise to cook naked on This Morning if they won at the 2011 NTA Awards. Gino has become known for stripping off on screen

Gino D'ACampo and wife Jessica

Gino D’ACampo and wife Jessica

Gino ‘said and did whatever he wanted’ while working for ITV – as his alleged victims insisted they were ‘too afraid’ to make complaints at the time. 

Advertisement

Sources told MailOnline that ITV began to ease out Gino in the wake of the scandal that engulfed the BBC over MasterChef’s Gregg Wallace, especially after Phillip Schofield’s bitter exit from This Morning.

But amid questions about why they didn’t raise incidents spanning 12 years, most of the women told ITV News they were ‘too afraid’ to make complaints about D’Acampo because they were self-employed and feared being ostracised in TV.

After a bumper few years, Gino’s company has seen its value increase by between £500,000 and £2.06million each year between 2019 and 2024. 

It currently has £2million in cash in the bank. The company is now worth £4.9million.

MailOnline estimates that his total net worth is £5.7million.

Advertisement

Potential loss: £979,000-a-year

Gregg Wallace 

Gregg Wallace had been earning an estimated £400,000-a-year from his Masterchef role, which, as is suspected, will now be lost if he does not return to TV.

The former MasterChef host, 60, stepped down from hosting the BBC show with Jon Torode in November after multiple complaints of inappropriate behaviour on set.

Before his big break, the star used all his Cockney charms to create an appealing TV persona – ‘the fat, bald bloke off the telly who likes pudding’, as he once styled himself.

But he initially made his living as a greengrocer, although market traders he once worked alongside have claimed they were the ones left counting the cost of his success. 

Advertisement

With his six-figure BBC salary on hold, Gregg has a separate fitness business on the side called Showme.fit which is currently worth £108,663. 

There is also a new health and food business, whose accounts are not yet available.

Ex-MasterChef judge Gregg Wallace was spotted for the first time in February after not being out in public since November 28, 2024

Ex-MasterChef judge Gregg Wallace was spotted for the first time in February after not being out in public since November 28, 2024

Wallace co-hosted Masterchef for 17 years alongside John Torode (left)

Wallace co-hosted Masterchef for 17 years alongside John Torode (left) 

But he stepped back amid an investigation into his conduct over a period of 17 years

But he stepped back amid an investigation into his conduct over a period of 17 years

Advertisement

He also has £32,000 held in his company Lobster Enterprises Ltd, where his TV money is paid into.

George Allan’s Greengrocers, the company Wallace founded in 1989, was built into a business with a £7.5million turnover.

But last year a former manager claimed Gregg left behind £1.5 million in debt – and a host of disgruntled ex-colleagues – when the firm went under in 2000. 

In his 2012 autobiography, Life on a Plate, Wallace acknowledged: ‘We were owed millions and we owed millions to wholesalers in the market’.

He also described how he ‘didn’t have to pick up all the bills personally’ after Gregg Allan’s failed, since it was a limited company, and hit back at the idea that fame had resulted in a loss of focus on his part.

Advertisement

‘Many of the traders had joined forces and said they refused to employ me,’ wrote Wallace. 

‘It wasn’t fair but they blamed me for George Allan’s closure. They thought I’d got too fancy and big for my boots, being on telly now, and I let it all go to pot.

‘Nothing could’ve been further from the truth, though. It’s always the way: the last one out to turn off the lights, gets the blame.’

Gregg founded George Allan’s Greengrocers in 1989 and built the company into a business with a £7.5 million turnover

Gregg founded George Allan’s Greengrocers in 1989 and built the company into a business with a £7.5 million turnover

In 2014 Gregg was forced to close his Wallace and Co restaurant in Putney, South West London and sell its parent company Wallace Cafes.

Advertisement

Since then he has relied on his £400,000-a-year MasterChef salary, which is now hanging in the balance.

Much of the earning pressure is now on his ShowMe.Fit app, which he advertises using his popular Instagram account. But it emerged last year that he borrowed £70,000 to keep it going.

It is currently worth £108,663, according to the accounts.

Lobster Enterprises Ltd, where his TV cash is paid into, paid tax suggesting it made a £400,000 profit. But it is worth £32,000, according to the latest accounts.

The shamed Masterchef star, 60, also set up Gregg Wallace.Health after he himself shed five stone, with the business offering recipes, advice from experts and frozen ready deliveries.

Advertisement

The website reads: ‘Ready to transform your health and feel your best? – no risks, just results. Cancel anytime’.

However in recent weeks fans who signed up have furiously taken to review bible Trustpilot and claimed they are being incorrectly charged and are struggling to get their money back.

One customer fumed: ‘What a scam. I cancelled my membership when they changed apps. However [it] managed to do an auto renewal of my membership and deducted an annual subscription for a non functioning App. Getting no reply on their email for a refund. Customer service terrible and would not recommend them’.

Potential loss: £400,000-a-year 

Noel Clarke 

Noel Clarke said that his work completely dried up the moment The Guardian story about his alleged sexually inappropriate behaviour was published.

Advertisement

In court papers he has detailed more than £10million in lost earnings since the article in April 2021.

One company he still runs called Astonishing Entertainment Limited, had assets of £432,583 in the 12 months up to the end of March 2021, when the allegation was made.

The same company now has just £320 according to the most recent accounts which cover the 12 months to the end of March 2024.

His company Unstoppable Film and Television Limited was bought by powerful TV production company ALL 3 Media, which was behind Fleabag, in 2018, but Clarke and business partner Jason Maza stood down in August 2021 after the Guardian claims were published. 

Noel Clarke arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice this week for his libel case against The Guardian

Noel Clarke arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice this week for his libel case against The Guardian

Advertisement

The company had assets of £3.3million in the months before the bombshell newspaper claims.

In court papers Clarke catalogued the earnings he was losing as a consequence of being cancelled.

They were a Sky TV show Bulletproof, series 4, where he lost his fee for acting in 10 episodes – £585,000, his fee for writing two episodes – £90,000 – his fee for directing two episodes – £90,000 – and anticipated royalties of £250,000.

The Guardian article came out midway through an ITV series Viewpoint which was immediately taken off the air.

But a second series had already been commissioned meaning he lost his fee – £270,000, anticipated royalties of an estimated £200,000.

Advertisement

Advanced plans for a Channel 5 TV show Highwater which would have begun shooting in winter 2021 meant he lost a producer bonus – in the region of £60,000.

A BBC TV show called Crongton was ‘greenlit’ was ditched and meant he would not get a producer bonus – in the region of £60,000.

Clarke is known for his role in Doctor Who as Mickey. He is pictured here alongside Billie Piper who played Rose Tyler

Clarke is known for his role in Doctor Who as Mickey. He is pictured here alongside Billie Piper who played Rose Tyler

Noel Clarke pictured as DC Martin Young in the ITV Series Viewpoint

Noel Clarke pictured as DC Martin Young in the ITV Series Viewpoint

A StudioCanal movie Something in the Water would have earned him a producer bonus in the region of £40,000.

Advertisement

He would also have earned a minimum salary from his ex production company Unstoppable Film and Television of £1.25million over 10 years not including raises or bonuses.

He also said the projected approximate value of shares in Unstoppable Film and Television, which he says has now been ‘wiped out’, would have been £7million.

Potential loss: £10million 

Wynne Evans

Wynne Evans has almost £1million in cash and assets sitting in the bank, his latest accounts reveal.

But he has had to step away from the public eye after making a lewd joke that saw him have to leave the lucrative Strictly Come Dancing tour this year. 

Advertisement

Evans, 53, who made a sick sexual comment about dancer and broadcaster Janette Manrara, has also been replaced in his BBC Radio Wales show. 

Wynne Evans Ltd handles the majority of his media earnings, including his Go Compare commercial work.

GoCompare has repeatedly refused to say whether they are going to sack Wynne from his role, which is believed to worth at least £200,000-a-year. 

Wynne Evans is said to earn £200,000-a-year as the face of Go Compare

Wynne Evans is said to earn £200,000-a-year as the face of Go Compare

The Go Compare star reportedly believes his reputation has been unfairly left 'in tatters' after he apologised for a vile remark aimed at tour host Janette Manrara, when footage emerged of the comment at the tour's press launch

The Go Compare star reportedly believes his reputation has been unfairly left ‘in tatters’ after he apologised for a vile remark aimed at tour host Janette Manrara, when footage emerged of the comment at the tour’s press launch

Advertisement

Accounts for year to end of May 2024, filed in February show he has cash and assets of £734,830 – down from £761,798 the year before. 

He paid £12,186 in tax.

It does not include what he was paid to be on Strictly and its live tour before he was forced to walk away from.

He owns a flat in Croydon bought for £198,000 in 2014. It is now worth an estimated £288,000. 

His ex-wife Tanwen Evans owns a home in Cardiff bought for £465,000 in 2013, now worth £875,000.

Advertisement

He has a management company which manages the flat in Croydon but it is dormant.

But he disbanded another company seven years ago and he is one of many director-board members of a Opera theatre called Grange Park Opera in West Horsley.

When the Go Compare and Strictly star discussed the house he moved into after his divorce he described it as ‘sad and derelict’, backing onto busy a railway track and saying it cost £500,000 to make it fit to live in.

Back in January, the opera singer, 53, stepped down from the Strictly Come Dancing live tour after coming under fire for making a vile remark aimed at host Janette Manrara [pictured with Katya Jones]

Wynne Evans ‘ lawyers have reportedly compiled a 30-page dossier to take to showdown talks with the BBC as he fights to keep his beloved radio job

Wynne previously revealed he hit 'rock bottom' at the end of his marriage to Welsh violinist Tanwen (seen together in 2011)

Wynne previously revealed he hit ‘rock bottom’ at the end of his marriage to Welsh violinist Tanwen (seen together in 2011) 

Advertisement

But pictures unearthed by MailOnline revealed that the stunning Edwardian villa was apparently in immaculate condition, with well presented rooms and gardens, packed with period features and in good condition.

And at more than £700,000 it was more than four times the then average property price for Cardiff.

In a recent interview discussing his 2015 divorce, the opera singer was bemoaning the state of the house in Cardiff which he bought after splitting from Tanwen and moving away from his two children.

He claimed the five-bedroomed house was ‘all he could afford’ and said he had spent £500,000 on improvements.

The house with three bathrooms in the leafy area was described at the time he bought it, in 2016, was certainly dated, and needed some modernising, but according to Evans it had ‘boarded-up windows’ and his then teenage children had to sleep in tents in their bedrooms during early visits. 

Advertisement

Potential loss: At least £200,000-a-year 

Finance

Close Brothers accelerating cost cuts as motor finance bill mounts

Published

on

Close Brothers accelerating cost cuts as motor finance bill mounts

Close Brothers is speeding up cost cutting to help narrow losses after setting aside another £30 million to cover mounting costs of the motor finance scandal.

The banking group confirmed its total provision for the car finance redress scheme increased to £320 million following the Financial Conduct Authority’s move last month to set out details of how impacted consumers will be compensated.

In its latest update, it said it was set to exceed its £25 million in annual savings earmarked for 2026, which means it is now on track for an operating loss for central functions at the lower end of its £45 million to £50 million guidance.

The group revealed in March it was cutting around 600 jobs – nearly a quarter of its 2,600-strong workforce – over the next 18 months across its teams in the UK and Ireland under the cost saving overhaul.

It said at the time the cuts would come from actions including moves to outsource and offshore work, trim its office network and roll out the use of artificial intelligence (AI) “at pace”.

Advertisement

It is not cutting more jobs on top of the 600 already announced despite ramping up savings in 2026, the firm confirmed.

Close Brothers said on Thursday: “We are making good progress on our initiatives to deliver cost reduction and optimise operational processes, including the simplification of business and management structures, and further outsourcing and offshoring.

“We now expect to exceed our target of around £25 million of annualised savings by the end of the 2026 financial year, as a result of accelerating cost actions into the current year.”

The firm recently reported pre-tax operating losses of £65.5 million for the six months to March 31 after provisions for the car loans mis-selling saga.

But this marked an improvement on the £102.2 million in losses reported a year earlier.

Advertisement

In its update for the third quarter to April 30, it said its loan book increased 1% to £9.3 billion.

Shares in the firm fell 3% in early trading on Thursday.

Mike Morgan, chief executive of Close Brothers, said: “We have delivered a solid performance in the third quarter and continue to execute our strategy through this important transitional year.

“We are progressing well with the delivery of our strategic objectives and targets.

“Our capital position remains strong after absorbing the additional provision for motor finance commissions, enabling investment in future growth to further support the UK economy.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Alberta’s finance, hospital ministers stepping down, won’t seek re-election

Published

on

Alberta’s finance, hospital ministers stepping down, won’t seek re-election

EDMONTON — Two of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s longtime cabinet ministers are stepping down.

In letters posted on social media Wednesday, Finance Minister Nate Horner and Hospitals Minister Matt Jones both said they are leaving their posts after deciding not to seek re-election in the October 2027 general election.

“When the premier offered me this cabinet role, I told her it was likely that my second term would be my last,” Horner said in his letter.

“In discussing my plans with the premier, we both felt it was important for the election-year budget to be built by a member of cabinet who will be running for re-election.”

Jones, in his letter, said he asked to step back so that an “orderly transition” could take place ahead of the 2027 vote.

Advertisement

Horner and Jones say they remain supportive of Smith and the United Conservatives. They said they will continue to serve as backbenchers until the election is called.

“I am proud of our government’s work to restore the Alberta advantage by lowering taxes, reducing red tape, and championing Alberta’s innovative and entrepreneurial industries and world-class energy sector,” Jones said.

Smith thanked the ministers for their service Wednesday, saying on social media that both accomplished plenty in their respective roles.

Horner and Jones were first elected in 2019 when the United Conservatives and former premier Jason Kenney took power from the NDP.

Kenney appointed both Horner and Jones to his own cabinet in the later part of his tenure, with Horner serving as agriculture minister while Jones oversaw children’s services.

Advertisement

When Smith won the party leadership contest in 2022 to replace Kenney, she kept Horner in agriculture but moved Jones to the affordability and utilities portfolio.

After the spring 2023 election, Horner was shifted to finance, a role he had kept since. Jones had three separate ministry appointments in the years since, including stints in affordability and utilities, as well as jobs, economy and trade. He was also Alberta’s first minister in charge of hospitals, a portfolio created last year as part of Smith’s massive health-care restructuring that split the health portfolio into four.

As minister of hospital and surgical health services, Jones has been tasked with managing overburdened emergency rooms, especially in the two major cities.

Late last year, a 44-year-old man died in an Edmonton hospital after waiting nearly eight hours for care.

Jones, in January, called a fatality inquiry into the matter. He also promised to create a new physician triage role in hospitals to prevent similar deaths, but the government has found itself at odds with the provincial doctors association over compensation and the role still hasn’t been put in place.

Advertisement

A similar death was reported last week at the Royal Alexandra Hospital near downtown Edmonton. The Alberta Medical Association hasn’t provided details but has said the man had received some care but a lack of available stretchers meant he had to wait in the emergency room, where he died several hours later.

Alberta Health Services said it’s investigating the case.

Horner has overseen all but one of Smith’s budgets since she took office, including the most recent spending plan that forecasted a $9.4-billion deficit — the largest since the COVID-19 pandemic.

That figure isn’t expected to be nearly as steep anymore as a result of the U.S. war on Iran and the high oil prices it has caused. Some analysts and business groups have said Alberta’s fortunes could even swing into a surplus should prices stay high for longer.

Advertisement

Smith is expected to formally shuffle her cabinet on Thursday in Calgary.

Last week, Smith wouldn’t confirm or deny rumours that Jason Nixon, minister of assisted living and social services, could take over for Horner. She told reporters instead that an announcement would be made in due course.

Nixon told reporters last week that speculation was a “waste of time” and that he was focused on his current role.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 20, 2026.

Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Elections Board Rule Could Limit Public Access to Campaign Finance Complaints

Published

on

Elections Board Rule Could Limit Public Access to Campaign Finance Complaints

The North Carolina State Board of Elections is weighing a set of new rules that could make it harder for the public to learn about campaign finance complaints.

The proposed rules will have a long road ahead if the board votes to advance them for public comment at a meeting on Wednesday. Some transparency advocates said they worry that if the rules are finalized, they could hinder the public’s access to timely information about allegations of illegal political donations and lobbying activities.

Under one of the proposals, “Complaints and any other documents gathered by the State Board during an investigation are confidential and shall not be made available for public inspection or copying until the investigation is concluded.”

The NCSBE typically levies civil fines or penalties in open meetings, but doesn’t have a set timetable in which investigations need to be completed. The board has, however, posted some complaints on its website before holding public votes to dismiss them, including a case last month involving an alleged conflict of interest by Linda Devore, the GOP chair of the Cumberland County Board of Elections.

Bob Hall, a campaign finance watchdog, has long lodged campaign finance complaints, including one last year about a lobbyist giving to state Supreme Court candidate and state Rep. Sarah Stevens. Hall often shares his complaints with news reporters before state election officials launch an investigation. The proposed rule suggests that might not be allowed if complaints are confidential.

Lindsey Wakely, director of campaign finance for the State Board of Elections, said the rule aims to codify the board’s longstanding approach to preserving the integrity of its internal investigations. She said the rules aren’t intended to prevent someone who is making a complaint or subject to one from sharing it with the public. Rather, it’s designed to establish a clearer process for the state to address campaign finance concerns.

“[The proposed rule] speaks to what we will do with the records in our possession,” Wakely said. “It does not say anything about what members of the public may do with those records that they submit to us.”

Advertisement

If the rules are implemented, the State Board of Elections wouldn’t be able to release a copy of any complaint or any related documents until it has completed an investigation. Staff would have 15 days from the time the board receives a complaint to contact the parties accused of violating campaign finance laws. Staff would have 120 days to perform a preliminary review, though NCSBE Executive Director Sam Hayes could extend the timetable. 

“The rules allow the State Board to bury valid complaints in bureaucracy,” said Brooks Fuller, policy director for Common Cause North Carolina. “They owe it to the public and to the parties involved to handle complaints efficiently and fairly, and not let them drag on for many months.”

If the preliminary review shows someone may have engaged in conduct that could result in civil or criminal penalties, staff would open a case and launch a formal investigation. The rules don’t set out a timetable for how long a formal investigation would last.

If the investigation doesn’t uncover evidence warranting further review, staff will send a report to NCSBE members. Multiple members on the board would have five business days to request a full briefing on the matter.

If an investigation results in a civil or criminal penalty, it would be subject to public record laws, though the rules don’t lay out a timeline for disclosure.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending