Connect with us

World

MEPs back drastic cut in packaging waste but NGOs say law watered down

Published

on

MEPs back drastic cut in packaging waste but NGOs say law watered down

The European Parliament approved on Wednesday new rules aiming to dramatically reduce packaging waste in the EU by several million tonnes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Once the legislation is in place, it will enhance the reuse, collection and recycling of packaging and many single-use packaging items will cease to be used, such as lightweight plastic bags but some NGOs have decried what they say is a watering down of the initial proposed bill.

According to the Parliament’s environment committee chair, Pascal Canfin, the law will change the mindset of the packaging industries and could cut 20% or 30% of the 80 billion tonnes of packaging waste produced every year in Europe. 

“It is probably one of the texts which has been the most lobbied,” the French MEP told Euronews.

“I give you one example, McDonald’s is lobbying to keep the single-use model. The single-use model is that you use just once all that is necessary to have your food. 

Advertisement

“The alternative to this is precisely the proposal we pushed for, meaning that when you are in a McDonald’s, or KFC, or Burger King restaurant on site, not takeaway, then why should you use, to drink your coke, a single use cup? And not just a glass. Why?”

The legislation bans unnecessary packaging and will force industries to make all packaging recyclable by 2030.

Additionally, by 2035 all packaging must be recycled in Europe. 

The EU will also set mandatory quotas for the reuse of different packaging, including for beverage bottles.

Some member states asked for derogations to defend the interests of their packaging industries. In France, many feared the law would ban traditional wooden containers used to hold camembert cheese and oysters.

Advertisement

“Camembert packaging as it stands is biodegradable. It’s made of light wood and therefore poses no problem to the environment,” French MEP Jean-Paul Garraud said in an interview.

“And behind all this, there is a whole food tradition, there is a whole, naturally, important sector. For France, it represents thousands of jobs.”

But some critics have complained the Parliament’s position doesn’t go nearly far enough.

Sergio Baffoni, Senior Paper Packaging Campaigner at the Environmental Paper Network, said the outcome of the vote is “beyond outrageous: all meaningful restrictions were removed.”

“The very few that remain will actually increase paper packaging, as they are only aimed at curtailing plastic. This spells disaster for forests not only in Europe but all over the world. We already cut down 3 billion trees for packaging alone. Thanks to the European Parliament, the grotesque paper packaging demand will continue to grow. It’s utterly unsustainable,” he added. 

Advertisement

The Environmental Coalition on Standards (ECOS) accused Parliament of giving in to “throwaway culture”, arguing it will not sufficiently address rising plastic and packaging waste. 

“The European Parliament has just weakened a perfectly feasible solution to tackle throwaway culture, without offering an alternative. It is very frustrating that the European Commission’s progressive prevention and reuse agenda has not received full support from the Parliament today,” Mathias Falkenberg, Programme Manager at ECOS, said in a statement.

“The few improvements from MEPs, such as minimum durability standards for reusable packaging, do little to make up for the overall lack of ambition,” he also said. 

The European Parliament will now enter negotiations with the Council of the EU in order to find a common position on the law.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Arizona Senate repeals near-total 1864 abortion ban in divisive vote

Published

on

Arizona Senate repeals near-total 1864 abortion ban in divisive vote

The repeal of abortion ban was passed 16 to 14 and is expected to be signed into law by Governor Katie Hobbs.

The Arizona Senate has voted to repeal the state’s 1864 ban on abortion, which would otherwise have taken effect within weeks.

The repeal was passed by the Senate in a 16-14 vote on Wednesday and is expected to be signed swiftly by Governor Katie Hobbs, a Democrat. Two Republican senators crossed party lines to vote in favour of repealing the ban.

The Arizona House last week passed the measure after a handful of Republicans broke party ranks and voted with Democrats to send it to the Senate.

“We’re here to repeal a bad law,” Senator Eva Burch, a Democrat, said from the floor. “I don’t want us honouring laws about women, written during a time when women were forbidden from voting.”

Advertisement

Republican Senator Wendy Rogers said in casting her vote to maintain the 1864 ban that repealing the law went against the conservative values of Arizona.

“Life starts at conception. They got it right in 1864. We need to continue to get it right in 2024,” Rogers said.

The fight over the Civil War-era abortion ban in Arizona, a state sharply split between Democrats and Republicans, is the latest flashpoint on women’s reproductive rights in the United States. In 2022, the country’s Supreme Court ended the constitutional right to abortion, leaving it up to states to decide the issue. Conservative-led states quickly invoked strict bans on the procedure within their borders.

Democrats across the US, confident that public opinion is on their side in supporting abortion rights, have sought to elevate the issue ahead of November’s presidential election. Arizona is a key battleground state.

Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee that works to elect Democrats to state legislatures, said her party would capitalise on the “extreme nature of MAGA Arizona Republicans” who voted to maintain the 1864 law as Democrats try to flip the state’s House and Senate in November’s elections.

Advertisement

Rogers, the Republican state senator, acknowledged the political risks.

“Some colleagues would say it’s politically pragmatic for us to find middle ground,” she said. “We might lose the legislature, we might lose the presidential election. But it’s more important to do what’s right.”

Near-total ban on abortions

The 1864 law was revived by a state Supreme Court ruling on April 9, and unless the legislature intervened, it would have taken effect within 60 days of that ruling, according to state Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat.

If the repeal bill is signed, a 2022 statute banning the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy would become Arizona’s prevailing abortion law. Still, there would probably be a period when nearly all abortions would be outlawed because the repeal would not take effect until 90 days after the end of the legislative session, which is expected to be in June or July.

Planned Parenthood Arizona, a sexual health organisation in the state, announced it filed a motion on Wednesday afternoon asking the state Supreme Court to prevent a pause in abortion services until the repeal takes effect.

Advertisement

The near-total ban on abortions predates Arizona becoming a state.

Under the 1864 law, “every person” who participates in conducting an abortion can be held criminally liable and face a minimum sentence of two years in prison.

There are no exceptions for cases of rape or incest, although there is an exception when the pregnancy puts a woman’s life at risk.

Continue Reading

World

Dan Schneider Files Defamation Suit Against Quiet on Set Producers, Says Docuseries Is a ‘Hit Job’

Published

on

Dan Schneider Files Defamation Suit Against Quiet on Set Producers, Says Docuseries Is a ‘Hit Job’


Dan Schneider Sues ‘Quiet on Set’ Producers — Lawsuit Details



Advertisement



















Advertisement





















Advertisement



Advertisement

ad


Advertisement





Advertisement


Quantcast



Continue Reading

World

University of Tehran professor says protesters at US colleges will support Iran in American conflict

Published

on

University of Tehran professor says protesters at US colleges will support Iran in American conflict

A University of Tehran professor said in an interview that Iran likes seeing protests on U.S. college campuses, adding those are their supporters if there is ever a conflict between the two countries.

Professor Foad Izadi, who, according to the University of Southern California Center on Public Diplomacy, earned his master’s degree from the University of Houston, was seen in a video being interviewed about the protests in the U.S.

“Sooner or later, this kind of support for the Zionist regime by the American regime will diminish. It might not stop completely, but its diminishing is important,” he said. “This is why the demonstrations [on U.S. campuses] are important.”

Izadi spoke as a member of the Islamic Republic, and oftentimes said, “we,” referring to him and the republic.

Advertisement

TRUMP SAYS 4 WORDS ABOUT ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTS ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES AS ARRESTS SKYROCKET

State troopers in riot gear try to beak up an anti-Israel protest at the University of Texas on Wednesday, April 24, 2024. (Jay Janner/American-Statesman)

“We are watching the demonstrations and like what we see, but it should not end with this,” Izadi said. “If not for the Islamic Republic, the case of the Palestinian idea would have been closed years ago. The idea of resistance belongs to Iran, but on the operational level, when it comes to recruiting connections and building networks, the [Iranian] state has not been involved in a sufficient level.

“These (American students) are our people,” he continued. “If tensions between America and Iran rise tomorrow or the day after, these are the people who will have to take to the streets to support Iran.”

Izadi said there are Hezbollah-style groups in the U.S. that are much larger than those in Lebanon.

Advertisement

VIDEO SHOWS ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTERS BLOCK JEWISH STUDENT FROM GETTING TO CLASS; UCLA RESPONDS

“America is the Great Satan and our main enemy, but we have hope in these areas,” he said.

Iran expert and Foreign Desk Editor-in-Chief Lisa Daftari provided insight on Izadi’s comments.

“Quite rich to see the same regime that is fixated on torturing, raping, blinding, executing its own college students, is applauding the ignorant college students on American campuses,” she said. “It speaks to their focus on growing their influence outside of Iran.”

UCL ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTERS ASK SUPPORTERS FOR VEGAN AND GLUTEN-FREE FOOD, ZIP TIES, SHIELDS AND EPIPENS

Advertisement
A protester holds a sign during a march on Columbia University campus in support of a protest encampment supporting Palestinians

A protester holds a sign during a march on Columbia University campus in support of a protest encampment supporting Palestinians in New York City, April 29, 2024.  (REUTERS/David Dee Delgado)

Daftari explained that Iran has been beefing up terror proxies in the region and paying their way into American universities.

But at the same time, she said, the Iranian people have suffered under the rule of their “barbaric” leaders.

After watching the comments, Daftari also said it was interesting to hear Izadi say they have more Hezbollah followers in the U.S. than in Lebanon.

“Regardless of when these pro-Hamas protests quiet down here in the U.S., it’s apparent the regime has its sights set on manipulating this momentum to launch more attacks here in the West,” she said. “The question then remains will they focus on a physical attack or just the information war, or both?”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending