News
Hormones for menopause are safe, study finds. Here's what changed
Low-dose estrogen can be taken orally, but it’s also now available in patches, gels and creams.
svetikd/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
svetikd/Getty Images
Low-dose estrogen can be taken orally, but it’s also now available in patches, gels and creams.
svetikd/Getty Images
The benefits of hormone therapy for the treatment of menopause symptoms outweigh the risks. That’s the conclusion of a new study published in the medical journal JAMA.
“Among women below the age of 60, we found hormone therapy has low risk of adverse events and [is] safe for treating bothersome hot flashes, night sweats and other menopausal symptoms, ” says study author Dr. JoAnn Manson, chief of preventive medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. This is a departure from the advice many women have been given in the past.
The new analysis is based on two decades of follow-up data from the Women’s Health Initiative study, which followed thousands of women taking hormone replacement therapy. The study was halted after it was found that women taking Prempro, which is a combination of estrogen and progestin, had higher risks of breast cancer and stroke.
“The findings were surprising,” Manson says, pointing out that the reason the randomized trial was conducted was because scientists were trying to determine if hormone therapy decreased the risk of heart disease and other conditions.
After the initial findings came out, many women abruptly stopped the therapy. Prescriptions plummeted, and many healthcare providers still hesitate to recommend hormone therapy. But menopause experts say it’s time to reconsider hormone therapy, because there’s a lot known now that wasn’t known two decades ago.
Most significantly, there are now different types of hormones — delivered at lower doses — that are shown to be safer.
“Women should know that hormone therapy is safe and beneficial,” says Dr. Lauren Streicher, a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Looking back, Dr. Streicher says, it’s clear the Women’s Health Initiative study was flawed and that some of the risks that were identified were linked to the type of hormones that women were given.
“We learned what not to do,” Streicher says. The type of progestin used, known as medroxyprogesterone acetate, was “highly problematic,” she says. This was likely responsible for the increase in breast cancer seen among women in the study. “So we don’t prescribe that anymore,” Streicher says.
Increasingly, other types of hormones are used, such as micronized progesterone which does not increase the risk of breast cancer, ” Streicher says. Micronized progesterone is a bioidentical hormone that has a molecular structure identical to the progesterone produced by womens’ ovaries, and tends to have fewer side effects.
Another problem with the study was the age of the women enrolled. Most of the women were over the age of 60, Streicher says .” And we know that there is a window of opportunity when it is the safest to start hormone therapy and that you get the most benefit.” That window is typically between ages 50 and 60, she says.
Another risk identified in the Women’s Health Initiative study, was an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism among women taking hormones. A pulmonary embolism is a blood clot that blocks blood flow to the lungs.
Since women in the study were taking estrogen orally, by pill, this may have increased their risk, Streicher says. A better option for people at risk of clots is to take estrogen through the skin, via a patch, a cream or gel.
“The advantage of a transdermal estrogen is that it is not metabolized by the liver,” Streicher says. “And because it’s not metabolized by the liver, we don’t see that increase in blood clots.”
With a range of hormone therapies available now, Dr Streicher says there’s not a one-size fits all approach. “Hormone therapy is beneficial way beyond the benefits to just helping with hot flashes,” she says. Ongoing research points to protection against bone loss and heart disease, too.
Streicher says women should talk to their healthcare providers about what options may best suit their needs.
This story was edited by Jane Greenhalgh
News
Woman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified
Crime scene tape surrounds a bicycle in front of St. Lukes Episcopal Church in Atlanta on May 14, 2026. (SKYFOX 5)
ATLANTA – The woman stabbed to death on the Beltline has been identified as 23-year-old Alyssa Paige, according to the Fulton County Medical Examiner.
The backstory:
Paige was killed by a 21-year-old man Thursday afternoon while she was on the Beltline. Officials confirmed to FOX 5 that the stabbing happened near the 1700 block of Flagler Avenue NE.
Atlanta Police Chief Darin Schierbaum said the department was alerted around 12:10 p.m. that a woman had been stabbed just north of the Montgomery Ferry Drive overpass. She was rushed to Grady Memorial Hospital where she later died. Another person was also stabbed during the incident, but their condition remains unknown.
According to officers, the man responsible attacked a U.S. Postal worker prior to the stabbing before getting away on a bike. He then used that bike to flee the scene of the stabbing as well.
The suspect was arrested near St. Luke’s Episcopal Church on Peachtree Street in Midtown around 5:25 p.m.
What we don’t know:
While officials haven’t released an official motive, they noted the man may have been suffering a mental health crisis.
The Source: Information in this article came from the Fulton County Medical Examiner’s Office and previous FOX 5 reporting.
News
Man Charged With Posting Bomb Instructions Used in New Orleans Attack
Federal prosecutors have filed charges against a former Army serviceman they accused of distributing instructions on how to build explosives that were used by a man who conducted a deadly attack in New Orleans on New Year’s Day last year.
The former serviceman, Jordan A. Derrick, a 40-year-old from Missouri, was charged with one count of engaging in the business of manufacturing explosive materials without a license; one count of unlawful possession of an unregistered destructive device; and one count of distributing information relating to manufacturing explosives, according to a criminal complaint unsealed on Wednesday. The three charges together carry a maximum sentence of 40 years in federal prison.
Starting in September 2023, the authorities said, Mr. Derrick was using various social media sites to share videos of himself making explosive materials, including detonators. His videos provided step-by-step instructions, and he often engaged with viewers in comments, sometimes answering their questions about the chemistry behind the explosives.
The authorities said that Mr. Derrick’s videos were downloaded by Shamsud-Din Bahar Jabbar, 42, who was accused of ramming a pickup truck into a crowd on Bourbon Street in New Orleans on Jan. 1, 2025, in a terrorist attack that killed 14 people and injured dozens. Mr. Jabbar was killed in a shootout with the police. Before the attack, Mr. Jabbar had placed two explosives on Bourbon Street, the authorities said, but they did not detonate.
The authorities later recovered two laptops and a USB drive in a house that Mr. Jabbar had rented. The USB drive contained several videos created by Mr. Derrick that provided instructions on making explosives. The authorities said the explosives they recovered were consistent with the ones Mr. Derrick had posted about.
Mr. Derrick’s lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.
Mr. Derrick was a combat engineer in the Army, where he provided personnel and vehicle support, the authorities said. He also helped supervise safety personnel during demolitions and various operations. He was honorably discharged in February 2013.
The authorities did not say whether Mr. Derrick had any communication with Mr. Jabbar, or whether the men had known each other. In some of Mr. Derrick’s videos and comments, he indicated that he was aware that his videos could be misused.
“There are a plethora of uh, moral, you know, entanglements with topics, any topic of teaching explosives, right?” he asked in one video, according to the affidavit. “Of course, the wrong people could get it.”
The authorities also said that an explosion occurred at a private residence in Odessa, Mo., on May 4, and the occupant of the residence told investigators that he had manufactured explosives after watching online tutorials from Mr. Derrick.
Mr. Derrick’s YouTube account had more than 15,000 subscribers and 20 published videos, the affidavit said. He had also posted content on other platforms, including Odysee and Patreon. Some videos were accessible to the public for free, while others required a paid subscription to view.
“My responsibility to my countrymen is to make sure that I serve the function of the Second Amendment to strengthen it,” Mr. Derrick said in one of his videos, according to the affidavit. “This is how I serve my country for real.”
Outside of the income he received through content creation, Mr. Derrick did not have any known employment. He did receive a monthly disability check from Veterans Affairs, the affidavit stated.
News
The Girls: “This isn’t ringing alarms to y’all?” : Embedded
-
News17 minutes agoWoman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified
-
New York2 hours agoQuestions Arise About Jack Schlossberg’s Readiness for Congress
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoLos Angeles releases searchable list of worst rental properties
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoMLB News & Moments: Mets Gain Much-Needed Momentum by Sweeping Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoWhere to Find Free Street Parking for Shows in San Francisco | KQED
-
Dallas, TX3 hours agoDallas Stars Forward Would Be Perfect Trade Target for NY Rangers
-
Boston, MA3 hours ago
JetBlue to pull out of N.H.’s largest airport amid capacity crisis, officials announce – The Boston Globe
-
Denver, CO3 hours agoDenver area events for May 15