Connect with us

World

Fijians set to vote in ‘toughest election yet’ for Bainimarama

Published

on

Fijians set to vote in ‘toughest election yet’ for Bainimarama

Voters in Fiji will head to the polls on Wednesday to elect a brand new parliament after a bitter race between two former coup leaders.

The overall election pits Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama, who seized energy in a cold coup in 2006, in opposition to longtime rival Sitiveni Rabuka, a navy commander who himself led two energy grabs within the late Nineteen Eighties.

Bainimarama, 68, who has sought to handle the China-United States rivalry within the Pacific area and has championed efforts to sort out local weather change, is looking for a 3rd time period in workplace by way of the poll field.

His FijiFirst occasion comfortably received democratic elections in 2014 however fought to carry on to its majority within the following election in 2018.

Analysts say it’s now dealing with its “hardest election but”, with voters more and more involved concerning the rising prices of dwelling.

Advertisement

Inflation is hovering at 5 % in Fiji, a tourism-reliant nation that has additionally been hit arduous by the COVID-19 pandemic.

A few quarter of the nation’s inhabitants of 900,000 individuals stay in poverty, in keeping with official figures.

Shailendra Singh from the College of the South Pacific informed the AFP information company that the excessive price of dwelling will weigh on voters minds.

“Rightly or wrongly, the federal government will get many of the blame for it, so I consider will probably be a significant figuring out consider how individuals vote,” he stated.

Fiji’s Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama has been in energy since 2006 when he orchestrated a cold coup  [File: Phil Noble/Pool via Reuters]

‘Most vital election ever’

Voters are additionally petrified of a possible return to instability in a nation that has seen 4 coups in 35 years.

Advertisement

The coups had been racially fuelled, with Indigenous Fijians petrified of dropping political management to the economically highly effective Indo-Fijian minority, who make up 35 % of the nation’s inhabitants and are descended from the ethnic Indians who had been introduced there to work within the sugarcane fields in the course of the time when Britain colonised Fiji.

Rabuka, a former navy chief, staged the primary two of the ability grabs in 1987 after a coalition dominated by Indo-Fijians received a basic election. He went on to introduce a structure enshrining political dominance for Indigenous Fijians in 1990 and to turn into prime minister after a basic election in 1992.

Fiji later scrapped the 1990 structure and launched a non-discriminatory constitution in 1997.

However the election of an Indo-Fijian as prime minister two years later reignited tensions and resulted in a 3rd coup in 2000.

Bainimarama seized on the simmering tensions to justify his energy seize in 2006. After assuming energy, he moved shortly to abolish conventional, rival energy bases, such because the ethnic Fijian Nice Council of Chiefs, and pushed for equal rights for all Fijians. This culminated in a brand new structure in 2013 that eliminated the nation’s race-based electoral system, a transfer that received the previous navy chief help from the Indo-Fijian neighborhood.

Advertisement
A group of election observers getting in a boat on an island in Fiji. The sky is cloudy and they are wearing lifejackets
A multinational observer group is in Fiji to look at Wednesday’s polls [Multinational Observer Group via Reuters]

However this yr, Bainimarama’s foremost opponent, Rabuka has been attempting to make inroads into the Indo-Fijian neighborhood by forming an alliance with the Nationwide Federation Celebration, which attracts a powerful multi-racial vote.

“That is set to be the hardest election but for Bainimarama,” wrote analysts Lucy Albiston and Blake Johnson in a latest weblog publish for the Australian Strategic Coverage Institute.

“Though there are not any dependable pre-election polls, it’s wanting like Rabuka would possibly win, forming a coalition with Fiji’s Nationwide Federation Celebration. The divide between Bainimarama and Rabuka was once all about race, however Rabuka has persistently tried to exhibit a change in his stance on Indo-Fijian rights because the 1987 coup. This yr, it’s about social points and authorities companies,” they wrote.

Bainimarama, who has painted the election because the “most vital election ever”, has sought to reassure Fijians of progress and prosperity.

“We all know the stakes: our restoration, our jobs, household help, sturdy management that serves everybody equally,” stated Bainimarama in a marketing campaign cease forward of a pre-election media blackout.

Rabuka, in the meantime, stated Fijians had been prepared for change and predicted victory was at hand.

Advertisement

“After 16 years of disastrous dictatorial rule, we’re coming very near the top of it,” he informed supporters. “We shall be consigning them to the dustbin of historical past the place they rightly belong.”

Observers say the navy’s function shall be key following Wednesday’s vote.

For now, the navy has sought to allay fears of a navy led-intervention, with Main Normal Jone Kalouniwai insisting that his forces will “honour the democratic course of by respecting the end result”.

A multinational observer group led by Australia, India and Indonesia will see about 90 election observers monitor polling cubicles and the nationwide vote-counting centre.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Arizona Senate repeals near-total 1864 abortion ban in divisive vote

Published

on

Arizona Senate repeals near-total 1864 abortion ban in divisive vote

The repeal of abortion ban was passed 16 to 14 and is expected to be signed into law by Governor Katie Hobbs.

The Arizona Senate has voted to repeal the state’s 1864 ban on abortion, which would otherwise have taken effect within weeks.

The repeal was passed by the Senate in a 16-14 vote on Wednesday and is expected to be signed swiftly by Governor Katie Hobbs, a Democrat. Two Republican senators crossed party lines to vote in favour of repealing the ban.

The Arizona House last week passed the measure after a handful of Republicans broke party ranks and voted with Democrats to send it to the Senate.

“We’re here to repeal a bad law,” Senator Eva Burch, a Democrat, said from the floor. “I don’t want us honouring laws about women, written during a time when women were forbidden from voting.”

Advertisement

Republican Senator Wendy Rogers said in casting her vote to maintain the 1864 ban that repealing the law went against the conservative values of Arizona.

“Life starts at conception. They got it right in 1864. We need to continue to get it right in 2024,” Rogers said.

The fight over the Civil War-era abortion ban in Arizona, a state sharply split between Democrats and Republicans, is the latest flashpoint on women’s reproductive rights in the United States. In 2022, the country’s Supreme Court ended the constitutional right to abortion, leaving it up to states to decide the issue. Conservative-led states quickly invoked strict bans on the procedure within their borders.

Democrats across the US, confident that public opinion is on their side in supporting abortion rights, have sought to elevate the issue ahead of November’s presidential election. Arizona is a key battleground state.

Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee that works to elect Democrats to state legislatures, said her party would capitalise on the “extreme nature of MAGA Arizona Republicans” who voted to maintain the 1864 law as Democrats try to flip the state’s House and Senate in November’s elections.

Advertisement

Rogers, the Republican state senator, acknowledged the political risks.

“Some colleagues would say it’s politically pragmatic for us to find middle ground,” she said. “We might lose the legislature, we might lose the presidential election. But it’s more important to do what’s right.”

Near-total ban on abortions

The 1864 law was revived by a state Supreme Court ruling on April 9, and unless the legislature intervened, it would have taken effect within 60 days of that ruling, according to state Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat.

If the repeal bill is signed, a 2022 statute banning the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy would become Arizona’s prevailing abortion law. Still, there would probably be a period when nearly all abortions would be outlawed because the repeal would not take effect until 90 days after the end of the legislative session, which is expected to be in June or July.

Planned Parenthood Arizona, a sexual health organisation in the state, announced it filed a motion on Wednesday afternoon asking the state Supreme Court to prevent a pause in abortion services until the repeal takes effect.

Advertisement

The near-total ban on abortions predates Arizona becoming a state.

Under the 1864 law, “every person” who participates in conducting an abortion can be held criminally liable and face a minimum sentence of two years in prison.

There are no exceptions for cases of rape or incest, although there is an exception when the pregnancy puts a woman’s life at risk.

Continue Reading

World

Dan Schneider Files Defamation Suit Against Quiet on Set Producers, Says Docuseries Is a ‘Hit Job’

Published

on

Dan Schneider Files Defamation Suit Against Quiet on Set Producers, Says Docuseries Is a ‘Hit Job’


Dan Schneider Sues ‘Quiet on Set’ Producers — Lawsuit Details



Advertisement



















Advertisement





















Advertisement



Advertisement

ad


Advertisement





Advertisement


Quantcast



Continue Reading

World

University of Tehran professor says protesters at US colleges will support Iran in American conflict

Published

on

University of Tehran professor says protesters at US colleges will support Iran in American conflict

A University of Tehran professor said in an interview that Iran likes seeing protests on U.S. college campuses, adding those are their supporters if there is ever a conflict between the two countries.

Professor Foad Izadi, who, according to the University of Southern California Center on Public Diplomacy, earned his master’s degree from the University of Houston, was seen in a video being interviewed about the protests in the U.S.

“Sooner or later, this kind of support for the Zionist regime by the American regime will diminish. It might not stop completely, but its diminishing is important,” he said. “This is why the demonstrations [on U.S. campuses] are important.”

Izadi spoke as a member of the Islamic Republic, and oftentimes said, “we,” referring to him and the republic.

Advertisement

TRUMP SAYS 4 WORDS ABOUT ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTS ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES AS ARRESTS SKYROCKET

State troopers in riot gear try to beak up an anti-Israel protest at the University of Texas on Wednesday, April 24, 2024. (Jay Janner/American-Statesman)

“We are watching the demonstrations and like what we see, but it should not end with this,” Izadi said. “If not for the Islamic Republic, the case of the Palestinian idea would have been closed years ago. The idea of resistance belongs to Iran, but on the operational level, when it comes to recruiting connections and building networks, the [Iranian] state has not been involved in a sufficient level.

“These (American students) are our people,” he continued. “If tensions between America and Iran rise tomorrow or the day after, these are the people who will have to take to the streets to support Iran.”

Izadi said there are Hezbollah-style groups in the U.S. that are much larger than those in Lebanon.

Advertisement

VIDEO SHOWS ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTERS BLOCK JEWISH STUDENT FROM GETTING TO CLASS; UCLA RESPONDS

“America is the Great Satan and our main enemy, but we have hope in these areas,” he said.

Iran expert and Foreign Desk Editor-in-Chief Lisa Daftari provided insight on Izadi’s comments.

“Quite rich to see the same regime that is fixated on torturing, raping, blinding, executing its own college students, is applauding the ignorant college students on American campuses,” she said. “It speaks to their focus on growing their influence outside of Iran.”

UCL ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTERS ASK SUPPORTERS FOR VEGAN AND GLUTEN-FREE FOOD, ZIP TIES, SHIELDS AND EPIPENS

Advertisement
A protester holds a sign during a march on Columbia University campus in support of a protest encampment supporting Palestinians

A protester holds a sign during a march on Columbia University campus in support of a protest encampment supporting Palestinians in New York City, April 29, 2024.  (REUTERS/David Dee Delgado)

Daftari explained that Iran has been beefing up terror proxies in the region and paying their way into American universities.

But at the same time, she said, the Iranian people have suffered under the rule of their “barbaric” leaders.

After watching the comments, Daftari also said it was interesting to hear Izadi say they have more Hezbollah followers in the U.S. than in Lebanon.

“Regardless of when these pro-Hamas protests quiet down here in the U.S., it’s apparent the regime has its sights set on manipulating this momentum to launch more attacks here in the West,” she said. “The question then remains will they focus on a physical attack or just the information war, or both?”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending