Connect with us

Wyoming

Inside the toxic battle between ‘tone deaf’ billionaire and furious Wyoming ranchers over luxury resort that locals say will destroy ‘God’s own country’

Published

on

Inside the toxic battle between ‘tone deaf’ billionaire and furious Wyoming ranchers over luxury resort that locals say will destroy ‘God’s own country’


For decades, the biggest event in the sleepy village of Bondurant, Wyoming, was the annual barbecue held every June at the local church.

So the rural community of just 156 residents was understandably perplexed when the billionaire owner of the Chicago Cubs announced plans to plant a swanky new 230,000-square-foot luxury resort in their backyards.

Wall Street trader Joe Ricketts claimed his $50million project would be a boon to the area, drawing in fistfuls of tourism dollars while strengthening conservation efforts in the Mountain West.

The 82-year-old steeped his pitch in history and culture, playing up his longtime residency at a local ranch.

Advertisement

But in a plotline straight out Kevin Costner hit Yellowstone, he has merely managed to rile up just about every single one of his neighbors, turning a once mild-mannered group of country ranchers into an angry mob.

Billionaire Joe Ricketts has sparked fury among locals in a Wyoming town who say he is trying to change its name to be more ‘marketable’ to wealthy city elites

A lodge on the 1,300-acre Jackson Fork Ranch, owned by Ricketts since the 1990s

A lodge on the 1,300-acre Jackson Fork Ranch, owned by Ricketts since the 1990s

Ricketts wants to build a 56-acre luxury resort, known as Homestead, on Jackson Fork. The 20-unit complex includes plans for an underground day spa, 90-seat fine dining restaurant, beauty shop, and horse operation

Ricketts wants to build a 56-acre luxury resort, known as Homestead, on Jackson Fork. The 20-unit complex includes plans for an underground day spa, 90-seat fine dining restaurant, beauty shop, and horse operation

All kinds of insults have been hurled in his direction. Residents say his ‘tone deaf’ plans will ‘erode’ their culture, destroy wildlife and drive up the cost of living.

He has been accused of behaving ‘like a little boy who wants all his toys’.

For a time, the man who told his neighbors he was ‘proud to be a billionaire’ did have it all his own way.

His plans for his new resort were approved and he even scooped up two other luxury properties for his Wyoming empire: a 363-acre ski resort and a 100-room hotel.

Advertisement

But now the tide appears to be turning against the TD Ameritrade founder.

Last month, officials restricted work on his new resort, doubling its expected construction time.

The setback came hot on the heels of a failed bid to roll out a second luxury resort on another of his Wyoming ranches.

Ricketts, whose net worth is estimated at $3.4billion, is now faced with increasingly determined opposition, who have come to view the matter as an existential threat to their very being.

County commissioner Doug Vickrey told a public meeting last year: ‘I would like Mr. Ricketts to know that with all his wealth there are some things in this world money cannot buy, and by God I’m one of them.’

Advertisement

So has the Major League Baseball owner finally struck out over his dreams for a slice of heaven?

The pitch

It is a battle being played out across the Mountain West.

Teton County, home to upscale Jackson Hole, in particular has become an outdoor playground for America’s elite in the wake of the pandemic.

But Bondurant, in adjacent Sublette County, has for years deliberately shunned the glitz and the glamor that has seen its better known neighbor become a tourist trap.

The village is ‘God’s country’ – as locals put it – and not for sale.

Advertisement

In hindsight, then, it was perhaps a mistake for Ricketts to propose changing Bondurant’s name to ‘Little Jackson Hole’ to promote his new resort.

The 20-unit complex, called Homestead, includes plans for an underground day spa, 90-seat fine dining restaurant, beauty shop, and horse operation.

Neighboring lodgings are expected to accommodate the resort’s 134 future employees.

It will cover 56 acres of his 1,300-acre Jackson Fork Ranch, which spans the first 9 miles of the Upper Hoback 23-174, a contiguous swathe of ranchland punctuated by the odd private residence.

Ricketts’ staff have likened his vision to the Brush Creek Ranch, a Saratoga resort that describes itself with terms like ‘unbridled luxury’, WyoFile reported.

Advertisement
Ricketts has amassed a property empire in Sublette County, Wyoming, having also acquired a luxury ski resort and hotel in the area just south of tourist hotspots in Teton County

Ricketts has amassed a property empire in Sublette County, Wyoming, having also acquired a luxury ski resort and hotel in the area just south of tourist hotspots in Teton County

Ricketts and his wife Marlene pictured on Jackson Fork. Ricketts is now trying to cash in on his real estate holdings in America's least populated state by building a ritzy ski resort on his land

Ricketts and his wife Marlene pictured on Jackson Fork. Ricketts is now trying to cash in on his real estate holdings in America’s least populated state by building a ritzy ski resort on his land

Part of the pushback against his plans stems from the fact that locals argue construction would interfere with the migratory routes of local wildlife

Part of the pushback against his plans stems from the fact that locals argue construction would interfere with the migratory routes of local wildlife

Jackson Fork spans the first 9 miles of the Upper Hoback 23-174, a contiguous swathe of ranchland punctuated by the odd private residence

Jackson Fork spans the first 9 miles of the Upper Hoback 23-174, a contiguous swathe of ranchland punctuated by the odd private residence

Unsurprisingly, that has not gone down well in Bondurant. 

‘I’m going to be sick, sick, sick if Bondurant is sacrificed as a stepping stone to Jackson,’ said Sublette Examiner reporter Joy Ufford.

Ricketts has tried to reason with them. He has claimed that calling his property ‘Little Jackson Hole’ is a more ‘charming’ way to market his resort.

‘If I was going to advertise “Bondurant” to people from Los Angeles or New York, no one would know where it is,’ he told a public hearing in nearby Pinedale in May last year.

‘But if I advertise “Little Jackson Hole”, everyone knows where it is.’

Advertisement

Despite Homestead’s footprint intersecting with crucial migration paths of mule deer, pronghorn and elk, he has also wrapped in conservation as part of his pitch.

Rather than disturb vital habitats, the resort could educate tourists about the local wildlife and attract ecotourists to invest in conservation, Ricketts claimed.

He was so keen on the idea that he invited Bondurant residents in March to a seven course meal with goodie bags for everyone to convince them.

At first mention of the renaming though, most locals got up and left in protest.

‘About 75% of the people all got up and left the dinner right then,’ longtime resident Pat Burroughs said. ‘They left the gift bags on the table and just walked out.’

Advertisement

The backlash 

The two sides have been butting heads for four years now.

In July 2020, longtime Bondurant resident Melissa Harrison, a Jackson Hole realtor, was the first to voice her concerns over the resort to the Sublette County commission.

‘It will erode our local culture, it will harm our natural resources and wildlife, it will drive up the cost of living and it will set a devastating precedent for the allowance of spot zoning in our county,’ Harrison said.

At the time, her argument seemed to have won the day.

The commission voted 4-to-1 to deny the application.

Advertisement
Ricketts has already snapped up more than 1,800 acres of land in the area including the White Pine Ski Resort (pictured)

Ricketts has already snapped up more than 1,800 acres of land in the area including the White Pine Ski Resort (pictured)

He also bought High Country Suites (above) a month after his purchase of the ski resort. The timing suggests they all form part of bigger plans to build a tourism empire in the region

He also bought High Country Suites (above) a month after his purchase of the ski resort. The timing suggests they all form part of bigger plans to build a tourism empire in the region 

But Ricketts’ team came back with an altered plan 18 months later, trimming the size of Homestead from 64 to 56 acres.

It did the trick. The commission voted 3-to-2 in favor.

Residents sued, but lost.

Then, for a while, it looked like Sublette County really was for sale.

In April this year, Ricketts’ bought the White Pine Ski & Summer resort, one of Wyoming’s oldest ski areas that boasts nearly 30 runs, rustic accommodations and miles of Nordic trails.

Advertisement

He followed that up with the purchase of High Country Suites, also in Pinedale, in May.

Timing of the sale suggests the hotel, known to locals as the Haliburton, could eventually be linked with Ricketts’ plans for the White Pine ski resort.

Locals have also speculated that it is all meant to dovetail with his plans for ‘Little Jackson Hole’.

A futile fight back? 

But it turns out Ricketts’ billions will only go so far.

In March 2023, commissioners rebuffed his request to fold another of his holdings – the 159-acre Dead Shot guest ranch – into Jackson Fork and build an 8,000-square-foot restaurant, bunkhouse, gymnasium, staff quarters and 10 guest cabins.

Advertisement

It marked a significant change in dynamics on the board, with commissioner Sam White retracting his previous support for Ricketts.

Then, last month, the ‘Little Jackson Hole’ dream suffered a blow, as the commission voted by the same 3-to-2 margin to reject the billionaire’s request to set aside seasonal construction restrictions intended to protect the 150-mile-long Sublette Mule Deer Migration Corridor.

Steve Christensen, who was representing Ricketts at the Sublette County meeting last week, proposed eliminating the seasonal restrictions with some concessions on his part. 

These included limiting construction to daylight hours, enforcing a 25 mile per hour speed limit on Upper Hoback Road and instituting a ‘wildlife friendly migration corridor’ across the ranch where construction would be getting done.

Christensen told county commissioners that without the Game and Fish Department’s restrictions, construction could get done in three years instead of six.

Advertisement

The argument resonated with Brandon Scurlock, the Pinedale regional wildlife coordinator for the Game and Fish Department, who said the ‘overall net impact to wildlife would be reduced by the shorter duration’.

Ricketts slammed a recent decision by Sublette County to enforce seasonal building restrictions to protect local wildlife, arguing it would double construction time

Ricketts slammed a recent decision by Sublette County to enforce seasonal building restrictions to protect local wildlife, arguing it would double construction time

A state conservation agency requested restrictions to protect the moose and elk populations. Steve Christensen, who was representing Ricketts, tried to offer concessions at a town meeting last week

A state conservation agency requested restrictions to protect the moose and elk populations. Steve Christensen, who was representing Ricketts, tried to offer concessions at a town meeting last week

But Bondurant and Pinedale residents were infuriated by Christensen’s plot, with Dan Bailey calling it a ‘used car salesman approach.’

‘Does anybody in this room actually believe that after three years the construction is going to stop?’ he said.

The commission’s decision to uphold restrictions means work cannot be carried out on the resort between November 15 and April 30.

The Chicago Cubs owner slammed the decision, with a spokesman for Jackson Fork telling DailyMail.com that it would be detrimental to local wildlife.

Advertisement

‘The contention that indoor construction would not have a negative impact on migratory patterns of the region’s big game was in total alignment with the Wyoming Game and Fish representative at the Board meeting,’ the spokesman said. 

‘The Wyoming Game and Fish, in fact, recommended that a reduction in total construction time would be most beneficial to big game, which proved to be in contrast to the Board of Commissioner’s decision to limit all construction to a total of only seven months a year. 

‘As a result of that decision, the proposed timeline of the project has been doubled.’

Bondurant residents were invited by Ricketts to a seven course meal in March with goodie bags for everyone. But when Ricketts mentioned changing the name of their town to Little Jackson Hole, most people got up and left in protest

Bondurant residents were invited by Ricketts to a seven course meal in March with goodie bags for everyone. But when Ricketts mentioned changing the name of their town to Little Jackson Hole, most people got up and left in protest

Ultimately, however, Ricketts is still getting what he wants, just not when he wants it.

And there is a growing feeling that local resistance to luxury development is futile.

Advertisement

In the north of the county, ranchers are already being replaced by realtors and tech investors. 

Jake Nichols, of Cowboy State Daily, mused on the consequences of the commission vote in March last year.

The conclusion was that, although a minor bump in the road for Ricketts, Bondurant may not be God’s country for much longer. 

‘The community is too charming, too unspoiled and, most importantly, too close to Jackson Hole to remain that way,’ he wrote.



Source link

Advertisement

Wyoming

Statewide candidates split on Wyoming GOP’s plans to defy state law and make endorsements 

Published

on

Statewide candidates split on Wyoming GOP’s plans to defy state law and make endorsements 


by Maggie Mullen, WyoFile

After the Wyoming GOP voted to defy a state law prohibiting the party from backing one Republican over another before the primary election, statewide candidates are split on whether they would accept such an endorsement. 

Some told WyoFile they agree with the party’s decision and will seek out an endorsement, while others said they oppose a political party breaking election law. A few said they were taking a wait-and-see approach. 

“Jury’s still out on this one for me,” Wyoming State Auditor Kristi Racines said Wednesday. 

For years, the Wyoming Republican Party has argued that because it is a private organization, state laws that govern its organizational structure and prohibit it from endorsing or financially backing candidates in opposed primary election races are unconstitutional. 

Advertisement

At its convention in Douglas last weekend, the party took things into its own hands, voting to adopt bylaws establishing a process for vetting, endorsing and spending money to support candidates ahead of the primary. 

Park County’s Tim Lasseter hydrates during the Wyoming Republican State Convention on Saturday, April 25, 2026, in Douglas. (Dan Cepeda/WyoFile)

Supporters of the new bylaws point to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from 1989, which struck down California’s ban on political party endorsements, ruling that the law violated the First Amendment’s guarantees of free speech and association. Opponents, meanwhile, raised concerns at the convention about the bylaws breaking the law, litigation costs and unintended consequences. 

The new bylaws are widely expected to spark lawsuits, while the Wyoming Republican Party has said it plans to file its own legal challenge against the state. 

In the meantime, the new bylaws lay out a process for evaluating candidates based on “commitment to the Wyoming Republican Party Platform, demonstrated loyalty to the Party’s principles, legal eligibility to hold office, and for incumbents, their voting record.” 

The state party will consider candidates running for Wyoming’s state-elected officials — including governor, secretary of state, superintendent of public instruction, treasurer and auditor — as well as congressional candidates. Otherwise, county parties “may vet all other races on their respective County Ballots,” according to the new bylaws. 

Advertisement

The state party, as well as each county party, “shall each create and oversee a Candidate Vetting Committee empowered to review and recommend approval or disapproval of candidates based on established criteria,” the bylaw states. “The Committee shall provide candidates an opportunity to respond to concerns prior to issuing a recommendation.”

Candidates 

Brent Bien, who is running for governor, told WyoFile the bylaw changes are “a long time coming,” pointing back to the 1989 ruling. 

“I think we just got to make sure we get those folks that truly believe on the Republican side of the equation, who truly believe in the platform and what Wyoming stands for,” Bien said. “And I just don’t think there’s been any enforcement mechanism to do that.” 

At the convention, Bien was a clear favorite among many attendees who wore his campaign buttons and t-shirts. Still, Bien said he wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t get the party’s endorsement. 

“I didn’t get Trump’s endorsement,” Bien said. “And some of these legislators around the state, you know, they haven’t endorsed me.”

Advertisement

Bien’s take isn’t shared by all the gubernatorial candidates. 

“Contested primaries should be decided by voters,” Gillette Sen. Eric Barlow wrote in a statement. “The role of the state party is to unite Republicans around shared values and help grow the party, not decide elections before voters have had their say.”

“Under current law, the state party should not choose sides in Republican primaries, and I will not ask them to start now,” he wrote. “My job,” running for governor, “is to earn the trust of Wyoming voters directly.”

At the convention, supporters of the bylaws said the party had tried to get the Legislature to change state statute. Barlow directly pushed back on that argument. 

Sen. Eric Barlow, R-Gillette, at the Wyoming Legislature’s 2026 budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

“As a legislator for the past 14 years, this issue has never come before us,” Barlow said. “If it had, it would have ensured all Wyomingites could weigh in and decisions would have been made openly and transparently — not in the courts and not a few months before an election.” 

Secretary of State Chuck Gray, who is running for U.S. House, told WyoFile he supports the new bylaws. 

Advertisement

“I will participate in the Party’s vetting process and will seek their support because I’m the only candidate in this race with a proven record of standing up for conservative principles — even when it wasn’t popular with the media and the insiders,” he wrote in a statement. 

As secretary of state, Gray is Wyoming’s chief election officer and oversees statewide election administration. Asked if he wanted to comment in his official capacity on the Wyoming Republican Party’s decision to defy state law, Gray did not respond by publishing time. 

U.S. House candidate David Giralt took a more cautious approach when asked for his opinion on the new bylaws. 

“I trust Wyoming Republicans to make good decisions for our party, and I’ll let the process play out,” Giralt said. “I’m focused on getting in front of as many Wyoming voters as possible and making the case for why I’m the right person to represent this state in Congress.” 

Kevin Christensen, another U.S. House candidate, said he wanted to see how fair, transparent and consistent the process played out before weighing in. 

Advertisement

“The Wyoming people are the ones that make the determination in the primary, not the party,” he said. “That being said, if this is about supporting candidates and determining who is really a Republican and who’s just putting an ‘R’ next to their name, that seems like that would be consistent with being the Republican Party.”

Jillian Balow, yet another candidate for U.S. House and former superintendent of public instruction, said she “would be honored to accept an endorsement and money from the state party only if it is in accordance with Wyoming and federal law.”

“The contingency of our party at the convention knew the changes they made defied state law and they curtailed delegate discussion to pass new by-laws anyway,” Balow wrote in a statement. “Some delegates were appalled, some were gleeful, and many were silent, because they were silenced. This is not the way Wyoming does business.”

U.S. House candidate Reid Rasner also pushed back on the new bylaws. 

“As a pro-Trump conservative, I always expected the political establishment to try and stop our campaign,” he wrote in a statement. “But, after making over 200 stops across our communities, one thing is clear: people are tired of the political games.”

Advertisement
Rep. Tom Kelly, R-Sheridan, looks over a bill from the House floor. Kelly announced his intentions to run for Wyoming superintendent of public instruction this week. (Joseph Beaudet/The Sheridan Press)

Sheridan Republican Rep. Tom Kelly, who is running for superintendent, said while he opposes “the idea of parties having the power to disallow anyone from running under their banner,” he thinks “parties should be able to express publicly which people they would like to represent them.” 

Though he’s not actively seeking endorsements, Kelly said he would accept support from the state party. 

“Financial backing? Absolutely,” Kelly said. “Contrary to a popular false narrative, I have no wealthy D.C. donors bankrolling me.”

And if the party endorsed one of his opponents, Kelly said he would tell them, “Congrats. I should have done a better job presenting myself.”

WyoFile reached out to other statewide Republican candidates, including those running for governor, secretary of state, superintendent, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. They did not respond by publishing time.


This article was originally published by WyoFile and is republished here with permission. WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming lawmakers use pro-natalist arguments to justify proposed new partial abortion ban

Published

on

Wyoming lawmakers use pro-natalist arguments to justify proposed new partial abortion ban


When the University of Wyoming’s 25,000-seat football stadium is exceeds the population of all but four cities in the state.

Jamie Schwaberow/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Jamie Schwaberow/Getty Images

At the anti-abortion March for Life rally in D.C. last year, Vice President J.D. Vance had a clear message.

“So let me say very simply, I want more babies in the United States of America,” Vance said to a cheering crowd.

Advertisement

As birth rates fall in the U.S., prominent conservatives such as Vance are encouraging Americans to have more children. They say that’s crucial to maintaining the nation’s workforce, so there will be enough caregivers for an aging population.

Now, those arguments are being cited to pass new state-level restrictions on abortion, including in Wyoming, which recently passed a law to outlaw abortions once there’s a “detectable fetal heartbeat.”

According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, it is “clinically inaccurate” to describe what can be heard via an ultrasound during very early pregnancy as a heartbeat. Cardiac cells in an embryo may exhibit electrical activity that is detectable, but there are no cardiac valves that could generate the sound that people know as a heartbeat.

The Wyoming law — which has now been temporarily blocked in court — prohibits abortions after cardiac activity can be detected, which is generally around the sixth week of pregnancy.

“We’re sending a message that children are important and that they’re the future,” said Republican state lawmaker and former nurse Evie Brennan.

Advertisement

“Without an up and coming population that grows up here that wants to stay here, then we just become a stagnant or an aging slash dying state,” she added.

Suzanne Bell, a demographer at John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said Wyoming’s tactic is unlikely to substantially grow its population.

“Imposing a ban on abortion is not going to transform the trajectory of a state’s fertility pattern,” Bell said.

She added that abortion bans can lead to a short-term population bump. Wyoming’s neighbor, Idaho, saw one after it instituted one of America’s strictest abortion bans in 2023.

“What that works out to in absolute terms is about 240 excess births,” Bell said.

Advertisement

But at the same time, researchers found Idaho was hemorrhaging healthcare workers. It now has 35% fewer OB-GYNs than before their law went into effect.

In Wyoming, population loss has been an issue for decades. Giving a tour to prospective students at the University of Wyoming in Laramie, Claire Lane said there’s not a lot of industry here.

“ I feel like a lot of students don’t see a ton of opportunities maybe necessarily in their fields to work here in Wyoming,” said Lane, a college senior with purple-tipped hair.

She said she plans to stick around for graduate school in speech language pathology, but she’ll probably leave the state to find work.

“We do have a super small population, so a lot of students know that they might need to go somewhere else to find a job,” Lane said.

Advertisement

A 2024 Harvard Kennedy School working paper said by the time Wyomingites reach their thirties, nearly two thirds have left — one of the highest rates in the country. It said a lot of young people are leaving for cities, of which Wyoming has few.

“With bigger areas, there comes more unique people and more creative people,” said Aidan Freeman, a second-year music student at the University of Wyoming.

Sitting in the student union building, Freeman said he and his partner hope to move to Fort Collins, Colorado soon.

“Wyoming is very traditionalist in some ways,” Freeman said. “It is kind of a bubble.”

Researchers from Harvard recommended Wyoming invest in its rural areas, making them more economically diverse and investing in a supply of housing for young people.

Advertisement

Brennan said she knows the partial abortion ban, which she helped pass, is not the complete answer to growing Wyoming’s population. She said the pro-life movement also needs to start focusing on more long-term solutions.

“We have to send the message that not only are you important in utero, but you’re also important on day one when you’re born, like outside of utero,” Brennan said. “And I don’t know that the legislature has had good, robust conversations on what that looks like.”

Wyoming Republic state Sen. Evie Brennan

Wyoming Republic state Sen. Evie Brennan

Dreaming Hollow Photography/Dreaming Hollow Photography


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Dreaming Hollow Photography/Dreaming Hollow Photography

Brennan said she hopes the legislature will evaluate the effects of the six-week abortion ban, but that depends on whether courts let it stand.

Pro-abortion rights groups challenged it soon after it passed. On April 24, a federal district court judge temporarily blocked the law, while litigation continues. That means abortion is once again legal in the state after six weeks.

Advertisement

Proceedings will continue at the district court level, and the judge will weigh in on the constitutionality of the law. That decision could then be appealed to the Wyoming Supreme Court. Earlier this year, that court struck down two more sweeping abortion bans in the state.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Statewide candidates split on Wyoming GOP’s plans to defy state law and make endorsements  – WyoFile

Published

on

Statewide candidates split on Wyoming GOP’s plans to defy state law and make endorsements  – WyoFile


After the Wyoming GOP voted to defy a state law prohibiting the party from backing one Republican over another before the primary election, statewide candidates are split on whether they would accept such an endorsement. 

Some told WyoFile they agree with the party’s decision and will seek out an endorsement, while others said they oppose a political party breaking election law. A few said they were taking a wait-and-see approach. 

“Jury’s still out on this one for me,” Wyoming State Auditor Kristi Racines said Wednesday. 

For years, the Wyoming Republican Party has argued that because it is a private organization, state laws that govern its organizational structure and prohibit it from endorsing or financially backing candidates in opposed primary election races are unconstitutional. 

Advertisement

At its convention in Douglas last weekend, the party took things into its own hands, voting to adopt bylaws establishing a process for vetting, endorsing and spending money to support candidates ahead of the primary. 

Park County’s Tim Lasseter hydrates during the Wyoming Republican State Convention on Saturday, April 25, 2026, in Douglas. (Dan Cepeda/WyoFile)

Supporters of the new bylaws point to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from 1989, which struck down California’s ban on political party endorsements, ruling that the law violated the First Amendment’s guarantees of free speech and association. Opponents, meanwhile, raised concerns at the convention about the bylaws breaking the law, litigation costs and unintended consequences. 

The new bylaws are widely expected to spark lawsuits, while the Wyoming Republican Party has said it plans to file its own legal challenge against the state. 

In the meantime, the new bylaws lay out a process for evaluating candidates based on “commitment to the Wyoming Republican Party Platform, demonstrated loyalty to the Party’s principles, legal eligibility to hold office, and for incumbents, their voting record.” 

The state party will consider candidates running for Wyoming’s state-elected officials — including governor, secretary of state, superintendent of public instruction, treasurer and auditor — as well as congressional candidates. Otherwise, county parties “may vet all other races on their respective County Ballots,” according to the new bylaws. 

Advertisement

The state party, as well as each county party, “shall each create and oversee a Candidate Vetting Committee empowered to review and recommend approval or disapproval of candidates based on established criteria,” the bylaw states. “The Committee shall provide candidates an opportunity to respond to concerns prior to issuing a recommendation.”

Candidates 

Brent Bien, who is running for governor, told WyoFile the bylaw changes are “a long time coming,” pointing back to the 1989 ruling. 

“I think we just got to make sure we get those folks that truly believe on the Republican side of the equation, who truly believe in the platform and what Wyoming stands for,” Bien said. “And I just don’t think there’s been any enforcement mechanism to do that.” 

At the convention, Bien was a clear favorite among many attendees who wore his campaign buttons and t-shirts. Still, Bien said he wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t get the party’s endorsement. 

“I didn’t get Trump’s endorsement,” Bien said. “And some of these legislators around the state, you know, they haven’t endorsed me.”

Advertisement

Bien’s take isn’t shared by all the gubernatorial candidates. 

“Contested primaries should be decided by voters,” Gillette Sen. Eric Barlow wrote in a statement. “The role of the state party is to unite Republicans around shared values and help grow the party, not decide elections before voters have had their say.”

“Under current law, the state party should not choose sides in Republican primaries, and I will not ask them to start now,” he wrote. “My job,” running for governor, “is to earn the trust of Wyoming voters directly.”

At the convention, supporters of the bylaws said the party had tried to get the Legislature to change state statute. Barlow directly pushed back on that argument. 

Sen. Eric Barlow, R-Gillette, at the Wyoming Legislature’s 2026 budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

“As a legislator for the past 14 years, this issue has never come before us,” Barlow said. “If it had, it would have ensured all Wyomingites could weigh in and decisions would have been made openly and transparently — not in the courts and not a few months before an election.” 

Secretary of State Chuck Gray, who is running for U.S. House, told WyoFile he supports the new bylaws. 

Advertisement

“I will participate in the Party’s vetting process and will seek their support because I’m the only candidate in this race with a proven record of standing up for conservative principles — even when it wasn’t popular with the media and the insiders,” he wrote in a statement. 

As secretary of state, Gray is Wyoming’s chief election officer and oversees statewide election administration. Asked if he wanted to comment in his official capacity on the Wyoming Republican Party’s decision to defy state law, Gray did not respond by publishing time. 

U.S. House candidate David Giralt took a more cautious approach when asked for his opinion on the new bylaws. 

“I trust Wyoming Republicans to make good decisions for our party, and I’ll let the process play out,” Giralt said. “I’m focused on getting in front of as many Wyoming voters as possible and making the case for why I’m the right person to represent this state in Congress.” 

Kevin Christensen, another U.S. House candidate, said he wanted to see how fair, transparent and consistent the process played out before weighing in. 

Advertisement

“The Wyoming people are the ones that make the determination in the primary, not the party,” he said. “That being said, if this is about supporting candidates and determining who is really a Republican and who’s just putting an ‘R’ next to their name, that seems like that would be consistent with being the Republican Party.”

Jillian Balow, yet another candidate for U.S. House and former superintendent of public instruction, said she “would be honored to accept an endorsement and money from the state party only if it is in accordance with Wyoming and federal law.”

“The contingency of our party at the convention knew the changes they made defied state law and they curtailed delegate discussion to pass new by-laws anyway,” Balow wrote in a statement. “Some delegates were appalled, some were gleeful, and many were silent, because they were silenced. This is not the way Wyoming does business.”

U.S. House candidate Reid Rasner also pushed back on the new bylaws. 

“As a pro-Trump conservative, I always expected the political establishment to try and stop our campaign,” he wrote in a statement. “But, after making over 200 stops across our communities, one thing is clear: people are tired of the political games.”

Advertisement
Rep. Tom Kelly, R-Sheridan, looks over a bill from the House floor. Kelly announced his intentions to run for Wyoming superintendent of public instruction this week. (Joseph Beaudet/The Sheridan Press)

Sheridan Republican Rep. Tom Kelly, who is running for superintendent, said while he opposes “the idea of parties having the power to disallow anyone from running under their banner,” he thinks “parties should be able to express publicly which people they would like to represent them.” 

Though he’s not actively seeking endorsements, Kelly said he would accept support from the state party. 

“Financial backing? Absolutely,” Kelly said. “Contrary to a popular false narrative, I have no wealthy D.C. donors bankrolling me.”

And if the party endorsed one of his opponents, Kelly said he would tell them, “Congrats. I should have done a better job presenting myself.”

WyoFile reached out to other statewide Republican candidates, including those running for governor, secretary of state, superintendent, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. They did not respond by publishing time.

Update: This story has been updated to include comments from Reid Rasner.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending