Connect with us

Science

Trump Administration Orders Rapid End to Hunting Regulations on Federal Lands

Published

on

Trump Administration Orders Rapid End to Hunting Regulations on Federal Lands

The Trump administration has directed national recreation areas, seashores, wildlife refuges and other public lands to immediately lift dozens of restrictions on hunting and trapping, internal Interior Department documents show.

The order, which takes effect on Monday, applies to some 76 federal lands that allow hunting but have rules to protect habitats or people. Curecanti National Recreation Area in Colorado had prohibited firing weapons from, toward or across trails. At Lake Meredith National Recreation Area in Texas, hunters had been barred from cleaning and processing game animals in restrooms. And at the Ozark National Scenic Riverways in Missouri, hunting dogs were required to have tags for safety.

Those and many other requirements are now deleted.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum ordered the changes, according to an April 21 memo to park officials and a spreadsheet of changes at individual parks, both of which were reviewed by The New York Times.

“Closures and restrictions not required by law must be the minimum necessary for public safety or resource protection,” the memo said.

Advertisement

Major national parks like Yellowstone, the Everglades and the Grand Canyon are permanently closed to hunting by statute and will not be affected by the order.

Critics said the changes were made without studies or wide consultation about how they might affect public lands. They warned of unintended consequences for animals and habitats. The Interior Department said in a statement that each change had been carefully reviewed and that any restrictions necessary for public safety or legal compliance would not be lifted.

Mr. Burgum has shown an eagerness to expand hunting and fishing on federal lands. Last year, the Interior Department allowed hunting across 87,000 new acres at national wildlife refuges and hatcheries. And in January, Mr. Burgum issued a secretarial order directing the National Park Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of Reclamation to review “outdated” restrictions that may pose an “unnecessary regulatory burden.”

Aubrie Spady, a spokeswoman for the Interior Department, said in a statement that Mr. Burgum’s order was a common-sense approach to managing public lands and said the agency was expanding access to hunting and fishing where it can be done safely and responsibly.

“For decades, sportsmen and women have been some of the strongest stewards of our public lands, and this order ensures their access is not unnecessarily restricted by outdated or overly broad limitations that are not required by law,” Ms. Spady said. She added that the agency does not comment on leaked or unofficial documents, but said internal deliberative materials did not reflect how the decisions were made.

Advertisement

According to the spreadsheet of changes that the Trump administration has requested at specific locations, park officials have pushed back in some places.

For example, Cape Cod National Seashore in Massachusetts said it could not allow hunting or carrying loaded weapons near trails and certain buildings because about 4 million people visit the park each year. And at New River Gorge National River in West Virginia, officials said they were not planning to change prohibitions on discharging firearms within 500 feet of visitors centers and campgrounds, calling it “a basic safety measure.”

But parks have already made dozens of other changes. Several have agreed to repeal restrictions on the use of artificial lights when hunting and allow permanent hunting stands. Conservation groups have argued that lights may affect wildlife and that stands can harm vegetation.

Other changes include an end to restrictions on transporting wildlife as well as rules restricting where animal carcasses can be left.

And in some cases, compendiums — the written compilation of closures, permit requirements and other restrictions at parks — have already been altered. For example, as of May 1, the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve in Louisiana eliminated a section that declared that all reptile species, including turtles and alligators, are protected in the park.

Compendiums have typically been designed at the discretionary authority of park superintendents.

“Those things were put into place by park superintendents over a period of time for very good reasons,” said Daniel Wenk, the former National Park Service superintendent of Yellowstone National Park, said of the changes, adding, “this is very concerning.”

Advertisement

Advocates for park protection who were shown the memo said they supported hunting in parks where Congress has authorized the activity. But some accused the Trump administration of acting irresponsibly and imposing a one-size-fits-all deregulatory agenda on parks with specific needs. Many said the administration was rushing through changes that could put hikers and campers in danger or harm vulnerable wildlife.

Several said the move appeared to violate the 1916 Organic Act, which created the National Park Service. It allows hunting where federally mandated but also directs the agency to conserve park resources so they are “unimpaired” for the enjoyment of future generations.

“What we’re really concerned about is, that memo didn’t say, ‘do analysis,’” said Stephanie Adams, who leads the wildlife program at the National Parks Conservation Association, a nonprofit group.

“It didn’t say ‘engage the public,’ and it didn’t say to be sure to focus on that key part of the Organic Act, which is to manage in a way that leaves the parks unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generation,” Ms. Adams said.

Hunting and outdoor sporting groups have praised the Trump administration’s efforts so far.

Advertisement

Aaron Kindle, the director of sporting advocacy at the National Wildlife Federation, a conservation nonprofit that supports hunting, said wildlife refuges often have different regulations than the states, creating confusion for hunters.

Rob Sexton, the senior vice president of the Sportsmen Alliance, a hunting advocacy group, said national park sites have had a “closed until open” attitude toward hunting that needs to be reversed. He said restrictions that are not grounded in state law or “compelling scientific evidence” showing harm to wildlife and habitat should be eliminated to help encourage more hunting and fishing.

Both Mr. Kindle and Mr. Sexton declined to comment on specific rules because they had not seen the documents.

“The number one reason why people give up hunting and fishing is the lack of opportunity and access,” Mr. Sexton said.

Federal land managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs inside reservations also is expected to be unaffected by the order.

Advertisement

Science

New MLK hospital program brings amputations to zero for at-risk diabetic patients

Published

on

New MLK hospital program brings amputations to zero for at-risk diabetic patients

More than three decades after a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, Michelle Caldwell says her disease is better controlled than ever.

She keeps regular appointments with her endocrinologist, primary care provider, dietician and pharmacist at MLK Community Medical Group, the outpatient arm of MLK Community Healthcare.

She picks up weekly produce deliveries in the South Los Angeles hospital’s cafeteria and attends its occasional cooking classes. She has learned to decode nutrition labels and developed a taste for salads and nuts.

Just one hurdle remains: the shoes.

Diabetes can damage foot nerves, making it easier for patients to miss small scratches and wounds that could lead to serious infections. Her care team was gently urging her to switch to supportive, closed-toe footwear.

Advertisement

But Caldwell loves a sandal, and the podiatrist-approved options were crimping her style.

“It doesn’t have to be, like, fashion fashion,” she said with a laugh during a recent visit with primary care provider Dr. Edward Cardenas at his East Compton office. But were there any options that didn’t look like “Frankenstein feet”?

That down-to-the-toes level of care is a feature of a program that has transformed the way MLK Community Healthcare treats diabetes, a chronic condition that affects one in every six South Los Angeles residents and nearly a quarter of MLK’s outpatients.

Four years after MLK launched an intensive management program for the most at-risk patients, more than 80% of enrollees have seen blood sugar levels decline. More than 70% have brought their blood pressure under control.

And diabetic-related amputations — which are painful and life-altering procedure that were the hospital’s most common surgery for years — have plummeted to zero for program patients.

Advertisement

No novel medications or treatments are behind these results, said Dr. Jorge Reyno, MLK’s senior vice president for population health.

Dr. Edward Cardenas examines a patient with diabetes.

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

Rather, a relatively modest one-time grant has allowed the hospital system — whose service area includes some of L.A.’s poorest and most disadvantaged neighborhoods — to provide the same level of care for its diabetic patients that people in wealthier areas would expect as standard.

Advertisement

“What we’ve demonstrated here is that we can get best-in-class care — we can even beat national benchmarks for care — if there’s the appropriate commitment and investment. And that people’s health doesn’t have to be determined just by their zip code,” Reyno said. “Because what we’ve created here is not necessarily incredibly innovative. It’s just what needs to be available — and is available in other locations.”

Some 1.3 million people live in MLK’s South Los Angeles service area. More than 90% are Black or Latino, and nearly 70% are either uninsured or have health coverage through Medi-Cal, Medicare or both.

Medi-Cal’s low provider payment rates is one reason South L.A. has only one-third of the full-time physicians necessary to treat a population of its size — a 1,500-doctor shortage, according to MLK’s research.

For many locals, MLK’s emergency department is about the only place they can see a doctor, given the challenge they face securing a timely appointment with a physician who accepts their health coverage.

Roughly 123,000 patients arrived last year at the hospital’s emergency department, which was designed to treat 40,000 people annually. About 40% were seeking primary care.

Advertisement

Emergency room physicians were diagnosing diabetes in severely ill people who did not know they had the disease and treating life-threatening complications for those whose disease had long gone unmanaged.

Patients arrived with gangrenous foot wounds that harried providers elsewhere brushed off as athlete’s foot. Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis, a life-threatening complication that occurs when insulin levels are so low that cells can no longer convert glucose into energy, were three times that of the rest of Los Angeles County.

For many, care arrived too late to prevent one of the disease’s most serious complications: amputation.

Nerve damage means a blister or pebble in the shoe can go unnoticed until it creates a serious wound. High blood sugar impairs immune function and narrows vessels that carry oxygen-rich blood, making it harder for skin to heal. Once serious infection sets in, amputating a foot or limb may be the only option to save a patient’s life. Across the U.S., diabetes complications are responsible for roughly 80% of all non-trauma related amputations, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Broaching amputation with a patient “is really tough,” Cardenas said. “You’re taking such a big part of them away. It’s identity, it’s confidence, it’s [the] ability to walk and do things for themselves. It’s a huge, huge thing.”

Advertisement

It’s also costly. Diabetes cost $306.6 billion in U.S. direct medical spending in 2022, the most recent year for which numbers are available, and foot ulcer-related issues were responsible for about one-third of that, said Dr. David G. Armstrong, director of USC’s limb preservation program and the Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance.

Indirect costs are also steep. One study of post-surgery outcomes found that only about one-third of patients were able to return to work after the amputation surgery, despite an average age of 54.

“The economic ramifications aren’t just the fact that you’re not working. It’s also that people in your family are taking off of work to be able to help accommodate this, or having to provide extra resources that they previously weren’t having to, so it has sort of a multi-generational effect,” said Dr. Caitlin Hicks, a vascular surgeon and director of research at Johns Hopkins University’s Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot and Wound Clinic.

In California, the households most likely to bear that cost are those that can least afford it.

Diabetic residents in MLK’s service area and other economically impoverished parts of California were more than 10 times more likely to have a toe, foot or leg amputated than diabetic people in more affluent areas, according to one 2014 UCLA study.

Advertisement

“The finding that residents living in lower income areas bear a disproportionate share of disability and disfigurement from amputations is deeply disturbing in a society that espouses equality and outspends all other nations on health care for its more affluent citizens,” the paper’s authors wrote.

It was a problem MLK decided to do something about.

A health worker in a white lab coat talks with a patient.

Clinical Nutrition Manager Jackie Juarez, left, chats with Claudette Meeks, a member of the community and a hospital patient, following a cooking class at MLK Community Hospital.

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

The hospital secured a $2 million grant from the Good Hope Medical Foundation, a private foundation based in Pasadena, with additional funding from the Rose Hills Foundation and L.A. Care Health Plan.

Advertisement

In October 2021, it began officially enrolling patients in its Diabetes Management Center of Excellence. Within this was an intensive-management program for a subset of high-risk patients, including those with Type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes or hemoglobin A1C levels — an indicator of blood sugar — at 9.0% or more. (For people without diabetes, a level below 5.7% is considered normal.)

For the most part, the system already had the endocrinologists, nephrologists and primary care physicians it needed. The money let MLK build a network of dedicated support staff who could take care of diabetic patients outside the exam room.

Between visits, patients in the intensive-management program had access to a clinical care pharmacist who reviewed and coordinated medications; a diabetes educator who walked them through blood sugar monitoring, meal planning and other daily concerns; community health workers who could make home visits; and a nurse care manager who served as their primary advocate and point of contact.

Through the hospital’s Recipes for Health program, they could pick up weekly bundles of fresh produce and take bimonthly classes on diabetic-friendly recipes.

They were more likely to stick to their treatment plan, and had more time at doctor visits to discuss medical issues.

Advertisement
A man holds a slice of cake on a plate.

Diabetes patient Jose Magallanes tries a cheesecake during a cooking class at MLK Community Hospital.

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

“We have multiple people reaching out and interacting with the patients in between physician visits,” said MLK endocrinologist Dr. Megan Jacobs. “They have someone reaching out to them [and] talking to them about the social aspects of things — how they have to take into account their diabetes when they go out to dinner and when they’re at a party.”

By year three, 66% of patients in the intensive-management program had lower blood sugar levels than they did at enrollment; by the fourth year, 81% did. In the third year 63% of patients had brought their blood pressure under control, rising to 71% the following year.

Four years after the program started, appointment compliance hit 84%, up from 50% at baseline. The hospital’s most severely diabetic patients were hospitalized for diabetes at less than half the rate of the area’s general population.

Advertisement

Most significantly, amputations among the intensive-management group dropped to virtually zero.

Over the course of four years, only one of the 1,165 patients in the high-risk group required an amputation. The surgery took place less than a month after their enrollment, indicating they likely entered the program with a wound at critical levels.

Diabetic-related amputations and wound care are now MLK’s third-most common type of surgical procedures, after holding the top spot since the hospital’s 2015 opening.

“This is absolutely, positively spectacular,” USC’s Armstrong said of MLK’s results. “This is life affirming stuff.”

The primary grant ends next year. After that, the program’s future is uncertain.

Advertisement

MLK is eligible to reapply to the Good Hope Medical Foundation, which has been “very happy” with the program’s outcomes, said Howard A. Kahn, the foundation’s chair.

The hospital is also talking to L.A. Care, the largest publicly operated health plan in the U.S., about a potential partnership, Reyno said. It could be a win for both sides.

“The benefit of cost savings usually goes to the state Medicaid plan or to the insurance carrier, who doesn’t have as high a cost to pay,” Reyno said. “If a program like this could be replicated in other safety net communities and have a wider impact, then certainly the return on investment would be even greater.”

Care providers also said they see improvements the data doesn’t capture.

“I hear [patients] say, ‘Oh, I walked to the park with my grandchildren,’ or ‘I was able to move around because I’ve lost the weight’ … maybe they had a sore on their foot that was kind of questionable, [and] ‘Now it’s healed because my sugars are under control,” said nurse care manager Monica Garcia. “Just seeing the benefits when they are compliant is the satisfaction.”

Advertisement

Back at the clinic office in East Compton — the shoe issue set aside for now — Cardenas examined Caldwell’s feet and lower limbs.

The doctor was optimistic that Caldwell’s recent discomfort came from tight muscles, rather than nerve damage, and recommended a stretching and strengthening regimen.

“It shouldn’t be painful, just like a tug,” he said, demonstrating a standing calf stretch. “If you like, I can refer you to physical therapy as well.”

Having providers take the time to explain her disease, rather than just scribbling out prescriptions, has made a world of difference for Caldwell, she said.

“It’s an awesome experience. I’ve changed my eating habits, I’m learning to read labels more clearly,” she said. “Even at my age, you think you know, but you don’t know.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

NorCal braces for dry, dangerous fire season as SoCal faces typical conditions

Published

on

NorCal braces for dry, dangerous fire season as SoCal faces typical conditions

Southern California’s top fire officials met behind closed doors in East Los Angeles Friday to discuss the outlook for this year’s peak fire season and how to coordinate the region’s world-class firefighters to keep communities safe.

At a press conference afterward, officials stressed that even though coastal Southern California is not expected to have an exceptionally dangerous fire season, they are doing everything they can to protect Californians. They urged residents to do the same.

“It is clear that wildfires are no longer solely a fire-service problem. They are an all-of-us problem,” said Orange County Fire Authority Interim Chief T.J. McGovern, standing in front of a suite of emergency response vehicles at L.A. County Fire Department’s headquarters. “They can only be mitigated by all of us working together.”

Coastal Southern California, which had the third-wettest season in record within the last 15 years, can expect a typical wildfire season, fire weather analysts predict. That’s in sharp contrast to Northern California, which saw a record-breaking March heat wave melt mountain snowpack early. Fire officials typically rely on the snowpack to keep vegetation green and moist into summer.

Advertisement

“The interesting thing about last year is that it was the southern half of the state that was significantly drier,” said Cal Fire Director Joe Tyler at a wildfire season outlook briefing last month. This year, he said, “we’re seeing that critical condition really spreading across Northern California.”

Coastal Southern California must still endure a particularly dry June before reaching typical conditions July through September — and even “typical” conditions remain dangerous, which is why officials urged Southern Californians Friday to remain vigilant.

A series of fires mid-May served as a warning shot for the region. The Sandy fire in Ventura County destroyed one home and damaged two more structures. The Santa Rosa Island fire burned through a third of the second-largest Channel island.

Officials at Friday’s Southern California meeting urged homeowners to do what they can to harden their homes against wildfire — including covering vents with mesh to prevent embers from entering the home and using multi-paned tempered windows that are less likely to shatter in extreme heat.

They also asked homeowners to maintain defensible space around homes by clearing dead vegetation in their yards, making sure there is space between shrubs and trees and creating a 5-foot buffer around homes with nothing combustible, including plants.

Advertisement

Homeowners should also make sure they’re signed up for evacuation alerts from their local fire department, the chiefs added, and should not hesitate to evacuate at the sight or smell of smoke — regardless of whether an official evacuation has been ordered.

As for their part, Southern California fire departments have been working to thin out hazardous vegetation surrounding communities and remain at the ready to respond to fires.

“We will show up. We show up every time, across every jurisdiction … That’s not a question,” said Los Angeles City Fire Department Chief Jaime Moore. However, without defensible space at individual homes, it is “very difficult for us to be able to combat those fires.”

The Los Angeles and Ventura county fire departments have been working to remove flammable vegetation surrounding communities in the Santa Monica Mountains with fire department crews, goats and prescribed fire. The U.S. Forest Service has been doing similar work in the San Gabriel Mountains.

The crews are working to create a network of vegetation-free pathways, called fuel breaks, that can slow fires and give firefighters strategic access to wildlands to combat blazes. They are also working to remove particularly flammable invasive grasses.

Advertisement

“As we share our preparation to defend communities and build wildfire resilience, it’s a call to action,” Angeles National Forest Fire Chief Robert Garcia said. “It’s now a shift to individual homeowners and communities to start leveraging some of that work that your agencies are doing.”

While this kind of landscape-wide work has significantly increased in the state over the past five years, California is running out of money to complete such projects.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Forest Service saw a decrease in how much work it could complete after the Trump administration significantly reduced the size of the service’s workforce.

Neither the state’s funding woes nor the shrinking of the federal workforce are expected to impact firefighting ability.

“It is absolutely as strong as ever,” Tyler said last month of the federal and state government’s ability to respond to fires.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Video: Can the Artemis III Mission Go on as Planned?

Published

on

Video: Can the Artemis III Mission Go on as Planned?

new video loaded: Can the Artemis III Mission Go on as Planned?

NASA has chosen four astronauts for the Artemis III mission, but there has been a major setback: the destruction of a Blue Origin rocket and its only launchpad. Our science reporter Katrina Miller describes what this event might mean for the U.S. goal of landing on the moon by 2028.

By Katrina Miller, Melanie Bencosme, Joey Sendaydiego, Lauren Pruitt and Kenneth Chang

June 13, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending