“Roald Dahl was no angel however that is absurd censorship,” Rushdie, a Booker Prize-winning writer, wrote on Twitter, calling out the kids’s imprint of the British writer Penguin Books. “Puffin Books and the Dahl property needs to be ashamed.”

Rushdie is among the most well-known authors on the earth — whose e book “Satanic Verses” drew calls from Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1989 to assassinate him and anybody concerned within the e book. Rushdie was stabbed 10 instances final yr at an occasion in New York however survived, and his newest novel was printed this month.

The modifications in Dahl’s kids’s books had been accomplished in partnership with Inclusive Minds, a collective for people who find themselves obsessed with inclusion, variety and accessibility in kids’s literature, the Roald Dahl Story Firm mentioned.

Among the many modifications, in accordance with the Telegraph: The character of Augustus Gloop from “Charlie and the Chocolate Manufacturing facility” is now not described as “fats.” Now he’s known as “monumental.” What was described as a “bizarre African language” within the e book “The Twits” is now not bizarre. In “The BFG,” a reference to the character of the “Bloodbottler” having pores and skin that was “reddish brown” has been utterly eliminated.

Some characters at the moment are gender-neutral. The singing and dancing Oompa Loompas from “Charlie and the Chocolate Manufacturing facility” had been as soon as described as “small males”; now they’re “small individuals.” In “James and the Large Peach,” the Cloud-Males — mysterious figures who stay within the sky — at the moment are referred to as Cloud-Folks.

In some instances, new traces had been added. In “The Witches,” a paragraph that explains that the witches are bald beneath their wigs has a brand new sentence: “There are many different the explanation why ladies would possibly put on wigs and there may be definitely nothing incorrect with that.”

The Roald Dahl Story Firm mentioned in an emailed assertion Sunday that the assessment of Dahl’s writing started in 2020 — earlier than the works had been acquired by streaming big Netflix — and that tweaks had been “small and thoroughly thought of.”

The corporate mentioned it needed “to make sure that Roald Dahl’s great tales and characters proceed to be loved by all kids as we speak” and that the assessment was routine course of. “When publishing new print runs of books written years in the past, it’s common to assessment the language used alongside updating different particulars together with a e book’s cowl and web page format,” the assertion mentioned.

Suzanne Nossel, chief govt officer of PEN America, mentioned the group — a nonprofit that works to defend and have fun free expression by means of the development of literature and human rights — was “alarmed at information” of the modifications to Dahl’s works, calling the transfer “a purported effort to clean the books of that which could offend somebody.” In a series of tweets, Nossel wrote that “literature is supposed to be stunning and provocative” and that efforts to erase phrases which may trigger offense solely “dilute the ability of storytelling.”

“If we begin down the trail of making an attempt to appropriate for perceived slights as an alternative of permitting readers to obtain and react to books as written, we threat distorting the work of nice authors and clouding the important lens that literature presents on society,” she mentioned.

Nossel urged that as an alternative of revising literature and “enjoying round” with textual content, publishers and editors might maybe supply “introductory context that prepares individuals for what they’re about to learn, and helps them perceive the setting through which it was written.”

Others on social media warned of a harmful precedent. “You edit a few books with outdated attitudes, now there’s solely 400 years of literature left to go,” one consumer mentioned in a tweet. “The place do you draw the road right here?”

Critics say that Dahl’s books are bigoted, racist, sexist and larded with gratuitous violence. And a few writers thought the response to the most recent modifications had been overblown.

“It’s good to evolve with the instances,” Ashley Esqueda, a author and pop-culture skilled, tweeted. “Very uninterested in individuals demanding we stay locked into their childhoods.”

One social media consumer said they had been “fairly comfortable to have extra inclusive variations to learn to my infant … I’ve been horrified on the content material of a number of the issues I learn as a toddler, having revisited them as an grownup.”

Whereas Dahl’s writing is globally well-known — with a minimum of 300 million bought in 58 languages, in accordance with the British journal the Bookseller — Dahl himself is a polarizing determine who left an advanced legacy. In 1990, months earlier than his dying, he referred to as himself antisemitic after years of hostile public feedback about Jewish individuals in interviews.

Roald Dahl is as troubling as he’s beloved. Can’t he be each?

In 2020, Dahl’s household issued an apology for the author’s antisemitic, “prejudiced remarks,” calling a few of his language “incomprehensible.” Relations mentioned Dahl’s offensive feedback stood in “marked distinction to the person we knew.”

Ron Charles in Washington contributed reporting.