Connect with us

Utah

Ex-Utah State football player gets $150K after alleged retaliation for recording coach, police chief talking about sex assault

Published

on

Ex-Utah State football player gets 0K after alleged retaliation for recording coach, police chief talking about sex assault


A former Utah State University football player — who blew the whistle with his damning footage of the team’s head coach and the campus police chief smearing sex assault victims — will get $150,000 from the school in a settlement.

The agreement signed Wednesday ends the high-profile lawsuit filed by Patrick Maddox last year. The recordings that he made and quietly shared of team meetings brought renewed attention to concerns that USU has continued to not take reported cases of sexual assault seriously, even after a federal investigation and especially within its athletics department.

Once staff and football players in the school’s program discovered he was the one who released the audio, Maddox said he faced retaliation so intense he felt forced to quit the team.

In his lawsuit against the school in the fallout of the recordings going public, Maddox alleged he was threatened by his teammates and had his gear stolen and destroyed. He also said he was forced to apologize to the team by head football coach Blake Anderson — who was also named in the suit. Maddox said that Anderson told the team that Maddox “made a mistake,” and the players could punish him however they “saw fit.”

Advertisement

When he tried to report the conduct to other university employees, Maddox said, he was ignored or told he deserved it.

Maddox said Friday that he’s ready to move on and “put this chapter behind me.” He hopes that his speaking out will also prompt a change in college athletics, with schools bringing in experts to talk to teams about preventing sexual assault and supporting victims.

“Football players have tremendous influence in the community,” Maddox said. “We are looked up to by so many. It’s important to use that influence in a positive way, and I hope we see a cultural shift in that direction from USU going forward. And from a personal note, I want to be a resource for victims and help in any way I can.”

The Salt Lake Tribune obtained a copy of his settlement through a public records request. It’s one of at least four high-cost settlements paid out by the school in the past five years. Together, those total just shy of $1 million.

That ultimately comes out of taxpayer funds, as Utah State is a public university.

Advertisement

The Logan school issued a statement Friday, saying it still “disputes the allegations made in Mr. Maddox’s lawsuit,” but has agreed to resolve the case to “move forward with continued efforts to strengthen the culture in the USU football program.” The settlement specifically states the school is not admitting fault.

The university also said as a result it has provided training to Anderson, the football coaching staff and executive leadership in athletics about “effective communication strategies for addressing sexual misconduct and how to avoid victim blaming language.”

Maddox’s case follows other reported issues at USU

USU has continued to stay in the spotlight in recent months with continued allegations of misconduct, abuse and a toxic environment among its players and staff. That includes a Utah State football player being charged this week with rape and aggravated kidnapping.

In the school’s statement, interim Athletic Director Jerry Bovee mentioned that case specifically and said it is “deeply concerning and is not in line with our values and the overall culture of USU Athletics.”

But Bovee is in the position after the previous athletic director of the school, John Hartwell, resigned just days after Maddox filed his lawsuit. At the time Hartwell had said it was to prioritize his family; shortly after, a video came to light showing Hartwell repeating part of a vulgar joke while he was away at a football bowl game for the school. He apologized for that.

Advertisement

In the wake of that, too, then-USU President Noelle Cockett announced she would also be stepping down.

Those resignations followed a lengthy list of allegations around mishandled sexual assault reports that have dogged the school for years — in its piano department, fraternities and sororities, and repeatedly on the football team.

That includes the 2021 case filed by USU student Kaytriauna Flint that then led to Maddox’s filing.

Flint is a friend of Maddox’s who alleged she was raped by another member of the football team in 2019. She said the school protected its players and brushed off her case. The recordings that Maddox made of coach Anderson and Earl Morris, then the university’s police chief, were first cited in her lawsuit as evidence of the culture within athletics that has persisted.

Maddox said he hoped the audio would bolster Flint’s case and expose what he saw as troubling attitudes toward women. It drew national attention.

Advertisement

In one clip, the police chief can be heard telling players to beware of having sex with Latter-day Saint women because they might later feel “regret” and report it as nonconsensual. He resigned.

In one clip, Anderson can be heard telling his players it “has never been more glamorized to be a victim” of sexual assault. He has since apologized.

But Anderson has adamantly denied that he was ever told that Maddox was experiencing retaliation after the player released the recordings. He reiterated that in a statement also released by USU on Friday.

“Since becoming the head football coach at Utah State and throughout my career, any misconduct I have learned about, I dealt with swiftly and immediately,” Anderson said. “I have zero tolerance for sexual misconduct, and I look for frequent opportunities to educate my coaching staff and team on preventing sexual assault and relationship violence.”

Other settlements

Like Maddox, Flint signed a settlement to end her case. She received a $500,000 payout from the school last year.

Advertisement

Also this week, USU graduate Greg Noel settled his lawsuit against the university for $45,000. Noel, who is Black, had alleged that his professor drew a racist “coon caricature” of him and also made comments about Noel’s Haitian background. Noel said the school did little to investigate.

Prior to that, in 2018, USU student Victoria Hewlett received $250,000 from the university after she was raped at a fraternity. Her lawsuit claimed that five other women had reported to the school that the same man sexually assaulted them before Hewlett’s attack and before administrators did much to act on that knowledge. The school said the man had been on its “radar” but denied receiving five previous assault reports.

Hewlett’s case — along with the women who reported to USU that they had been raped by former USU football player Torrey Green, who was convicted in 2019 of sexual assault — prompted the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate USU and how it handles sexual assault cases.

Federal investigators released their findings in January 2020, concluding that the school often failed to investigate when it knew about misconduct and, as a result, “rendered additional students vulnerable.”

On Friday, in response to Maddox’s lawsuit, the school said all students receive mandatory annual sexual assault prevention training. Student-athletes are additionally required to attend an in-person training on preventing sexual misconduct and relationship violence.

Advertisement

The school said its incoming president, Elizabeth Caldwell, is “already engaged in these issues, and university leaders look forward to working with her to continue USU’s efforts to build a model program for preventing and responding to issues of sexual misconduct.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Judge hears arguments in case alleging Utah’s ‘school choice’ program is unconstitutional • Utah News Dispatch

Published

on

Judge hears arguments in case alleging Utah’s ‘school choice’ program is unconstitutional • Utah News Dispatch


Should Utah’s “school choice” program be allowed to stay put — or is it unconstitutional?

That’s the question that a judge is now weighing after spending several hours listening to oral arguments Thursday.

In the hearing, 3rd District Court Judge Laura Scott grilled attorneys for both the state and for Utah’s largest teacher union, the Utah Education Association, on the complex constitutional questions she must now unravel before issuing a ruling in the case — which she said she expects to hand down sometime in mid-to-late January. 

Earlier this year, the Utah Education Association filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Utah Fits All “scholarship program,” which the 2023 Utah Legislature created as an effort to offer “school choice” options by setting up a fund from which eligible K-12 students can receive up to $8,000 for education expenses including private school tuition and fees, homeschooling, tutoring services, testing fees, materials and other expenses. 

Advertisement

Utah’s largest teacher union files lawsuit against Utah Fits All school choice voucher program

In 2023, lawmakers appropriated about $42.5 million in ongoing income tax revenue to the program. Then this year they nearly doubled that ongoing funding by adding an additional $40 million. In total, the program uses about $82.5 million in taxpayer funding a year. 

That is, if the courts allow it to continue to exist. 

In its lawsuit, the Utah Education Association alleges it’s an unconstitutional “voucher” program that diverts money from Utah’s public school system — using income tax dollars that they contend are earmarked under the Utah Constitution for the public education system and should not be funneled to private schools or homeschooling in the form of the Utah Fits All scholarship program.

The Utah Constitution has historically required the state’s income tax revenue be used only for public education, though that constitutional earmark has been loosened twice — once in 1996 to allow income tax revenue to be spent on public higher education, and once in 2020 with voter-approved Amendment G, which opened income tax revenue to be used to “support children and to support individuals with a disability.” 

Advertisement
Scott Ryther during a hearing on Utah Education Association’s lawsuit against the Utah Fits All Scholarship (voucher) program, in Salt Lake City on Dec. 19, 2024. (Pool photo by Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune)

This year the Utah Legislature tried to remove that education earmark completely by putting Amendment A on the Nov. 5 ballot — but that effort failed after a judge voided the question because lawmakers failed to properly publish the proposed constitutional amendment in newspapers across the state. 

Attorneys representing state officials, the Alliance for Choice in Education (a group that the Utah State Board of Education chose to administer the program), and parents of students benefiting from the program urged the judge to dismiss the lawsuit. 

They argued the Utah Legislature acted within its constitutional constraints when it created the program. They contended that when Amendment G added to the Utah Constitution the word “children” as an allowable use for income tax dollars, that created a “broad” yet “not ambiguous” category that allowed Utah lawmakers to use the revenue for the Utah Fits All scholarship fund. 

Attorneys for the Utah Education Association, however, argued that when legislators put Amendment G on the ballot and pitched it to voters, their stated intentions did not include using the funding for private school vouchers. Rather, they argued it was characterized as an effort to narrowly open the revenue up to “social services” for children and people with disabilities. 

Ramya Ravindran during a hearing on Utah Education Association’s lawsuit against the Utah Fits All Scholarship (voucher) program, in Salt Lake City on Dec. 19, 2024. (Pool photo by Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune)

The judge repeatedly questioned state attorneys about their position, asking for clarity on the state’s interpretation of the Utah Constitution and whether it would allow Utah lawmakers the power to create a “shadow” or “parallel” education system that could funnel public dollars to private schools, which can select students based on religion, political beliefs, family makeup or other criteria. In contrast, Utah’s public school system must be free and open to all. 

Arif Panju, an attorney representing parents who intervened in the case to argue in favor of protecting the Utah Fits All program, argued parents have a “fundamental right” to exercise their “school choice” options. 

Advertisement

“The mere fact that they can use a private scholarship … does not transform those options into a shadow system,” Panju argued. 

But to Scott, that still didn’t answer her question. 

“I’m getting a little frustrated,” Scott said, adding that she wasn’t trying to debate school choice but rather she was trying to conduct a constitutional analysis. 

Ultimately, state attorneys conceded their position could open the door to a “parallel” or “shadow” system — however, they argued that’s not what is being debated in this case. They argued the Utah Fits All program was funded only after the Utah Legislature appropriately funded its education system, as required by the Utah Constitution (which does not set a specific threshold). 

When the hearing’s time ran out at about 4:30 p.m., Scott said she would take the issue under advisement, and she would not be ruling from the bench. 

Advertisement

“I’m hopeful for mid-to-late January,” she said, “but I’m not making any promises I won’t take the entirety of the 60 days” that she has to make a decision. 

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Green Beret calls for more to be done in search for missing Utah National Guardsman

Published

on

Green Beret calls for more to be done in search for missing Utah National Guardsman


SALT LAKE CITY — There’s frustration in the search to find the body of a missing member of the Utah National Guard, presumed murdered by his wife.

Matthew Johnson has been missing for nearly three months, and one of his fellow Green Berets said more should be done to find him.

“I think more can be done,” said John Hash, Utah Army National Guard 19th Special Forces Group.

Hash served with Johnson for 12 years in the Utah Guard’s 19th Special Forces Group and became friends outside of work. He was stunned to learn Johnson’s wife, Jennifer Gledhill, was arrested and charged for his murder.

Advertisement

Cottonwood Heights police officers escort Jennifer Gledhill into a police car on Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2024. Police say she shot and killed her husband as he slept. (Ed Collins, KSL TV)

“Having had Jen in our home before, you know, breaking bread with them, it turned out she’s responsible for his death; it was shocking, frankly,” Hash said.

That pain made it worse that Johnson’s body is still out there somewhere. Hash would like Utah Gov. Spencer Cox to get the National Guard out looking.

“I’d like to see the Governor commit openly to finding Matt, to bringing him home and giving him a proper burial,” he said.

A photo of Matthew Johnson and John Hash.

A photo of Matthew Johnson and John Hash. (Courtesy John Hash)

Advertisement

While the governor can call them out, the National Guard said that’s not what they do.

“This is a local law enforcement issue and not a National Guard or a state level issue. Human recovery is not a mission that’s specifically a National Guard mission or something that we specifically train for,” said Lt. Col. Chris Kroeber, Public Affairs Officer for the Utah Army National Guard.

It’s not necessarily an answer Hash wants to hear.

“You don’t give up, you leave no one behind, you bring him home, and he’s home, we just can’t find him, let’s find him,” Hash said.

Cottonwood Heights police, the agency in charge of the search for Johnson, said they didn’t have an update and are doing all they can to find him.

Advertisement

KSL TV contacted the Governor’s Office Thursday night but didn’t immediately hear back.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Liquor licenses go to 7 Utah restaurants and 3 bars, including Kiitos’ Sugar House location

Published

on

Liquor licenses go to 7 Utah restaurants and 3 bars, including Kiitos’ Sugar House location


Utah’s liquor commission approved licenses for three bars and and seven restaurants Thursday, including the long-awaited second location of Kiitos Brewing.

The commission for the Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Services’ (DABS) also learned that a program to allow customers to “round up” purchases to the nearest dollar — and donate the difference to help unsheltered Utahns — has been successful in its first weeks.

During the board’s monthly meeting Thursday, Todd Darrington, DABS’ director of finance, said $87,989 had been raised so far for the Pamela Atkinson Homeless Account, to support its homelessness services.

Commissioner Jacquelyn Orton said she found that number to be “extraordinary.”

Advertisement

Through Feb. 28, shoppers at Utah’s state-run liquor stores will also find donation boxes, each supporting a different local charity. With the donation of coats, canned goods, pet food and more, customers can help organizations (see a full list at ABS.utah.gov) that support people and animals across the state.

DABS director Tiffany Clason spoke about the importance of having a plan for a safe ride home when people go out to drink. That’s why DABS has partnered with WCF Insurance and the Utah Department of Public Safety, she said, to have WCF offer $10 rideshare vouchers for bar patrons needing a ride home. People can get the vouchers by scanning a QR code at the door of the bar they’re visiting.

The bars that received their licenses Thursday are:

• SnowmoBAR, 877 S. 200 West, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 1, 2025). This bar will be a rebrand of Snowmobile Pizza, which has been closed since August for a remodel.

• Eleven Nightclub, downtown Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 10, 2025).

Advertisement

• Kiitos Brewing, 1533 S. 1100 East, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 28, 2025). Business manager Jamie Kearns said February is looking more likely for the opening of this second Kiitos location, in Sugar House.

The restaurants that received their licenses are:

• Don Miguel’s, 453 S. Main St., Cedar City.

• The Hub, 1165 S. Main St., Heber City.

• Cody’s Gastro Garage, 2100 S. Main St., Nephi (conditional).

Advertisement

• Back Spin Bistro, St. George (conditional, projected opening Jan. 1, 2025).

• Cosmica, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 15, 2025).

• Lucky Slice Pizza, 37 W. Center Street, Logan (conditional, projected opening Feb. 1, 2025; this is a new location).

• Hash Kitchen, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Feb. 14, 2025).





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending