Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Stephen King's Wild New Horror Movie Is Getting Very Strong Reviews

Published

on

Stephen King's Wild New Horror Movie Is Getting Very Strong Reviews

The Monkey, the latest film adaptation from one of hit author Stephen King’s novels, is receiving rave reviews after its first critic screenings.

Coming mere months after Salem’s Lot (based on another King novel), The Monkey is set to tell a horrifying story centered on a vintage toy monkey. This toy winds up being cursed, leading to a string of deaths unfolding around a pair of twin brothers as they have to find a way to eliminate the toy for good.

Led by Theo James, The Monkey is due to drop in theaters for the first time on February 21, marking the latest in a long list of 2025 horror outings.

First Critics Reactions to Stephen King’s The Monkey

NEON

Critics shared their first reactions to the film adaptation of Stephen King’s The Monkey following the first official press screenings.

Collider’s Perri Nemiroff called the film “a super bloody blast,” giving director Oz Perkins credit for sharing his own unique perspective on the Stephen King short story:

Advertisement

“‘The Monkey’ is a super bloody blast! A nearly non-stop series of gleefully violent kill scenes that well earn every ‘holy sh*t’ response they got out of me. Loved how quickly Oz Perkins cements that this is a version of the Stephen King short story that’s uniquely his own. I like some of his films more than others, but that’s something I often appreciate about his work in general. He always appears to have a clear, bold vision that’s been executed unapologetically.”

Nemiroff continued, telling fans not to compare the movie to something like Longlegs (see more on spoilers from Longlegs here). She detailed how this movie has a “particular style and energy,” which Perkins conveys to perfection:

“For anyone going straight from ‘Longlegs’ to ‘The Monkey’ and expecting more of the same, I’d let those expectations go. And that’s a good thing! As a horror lover, I can’t imagine a bigger treat than getting two movies from a filmmaker within a single year that well highlight his skills and confidence behind the lens in such drastically different ways. The Monkey rocks a *very* particular style and energy, and Perkins knew precisely how to make that vibe soar. Same goes for Theo James, Christian Convery and Tatiana Maslany. They knew exactly the type of movie they were making and don’t hold back while playing in that space.”

The Monkey is a bloody blast,” declared critic Eric Goldman, who felt the film took “a big shift away from Longlegswhile comparing it to movies like Final Destination:

“‘The Monkey’ is a bloody blast. A big shift away from the feel of ‘Longlegs,’ the movie is a full on horror-comedy with Osgood Perkins having a ton of fun going into ‘Final Destination’ territory with one crazy-gory-twisted death after another.”

Awards Radar’s Joey Magidson thoroughly enjoyed The Monkey, describing it as “savagely funny and savagely gory” while calling it the movie that “establishes Osgood Perkins as a horror master:”

“‘The Monkey’ absolutely rules. Savagely funny and savagely gory in equal measure, it’s a bloody good time that establishes Osgood Perkins as a horror master. You’ll be howling with laughter and covering your eyes in equal measure. I loved it.”

According to The Wrap senior writer Drew Taylor, Perkins’ latest effort is “about as good a time as you can have at the movies” due to its humor and how scary it is:

“Adored ‘The Monkey.’ Oz Perkins has been one of the most exciting genre filmmakers since he started and his latest is about as good a time as you can have at the movies – funny, scary, poignant and so, so fun. A rare movie that can be compared to ‘Gremlins’ in terms of giddy chaos”

Reel Blend’s Jake Hamilton feels The Monkey will be a horror movie he watches “over and over for the rest of [his] life,” praising the horror aspect while noting he had not laughed harder at a movie in years:

Advertisement

“‘The Monkey’ is going to be one of those horror movies I watch over and over for the rest of my life. Dark and brutal enough so that calling it a ‘horror comedy’ feels wrong, but it’s also the hardest I’ve laughed in a movie theater in years. A new classic King adaption is born.”

Fandango’s Erik Davis praised the comedy aspects of this film, recalling it being “incredibly funny to the point people were cackling in [his] theater” while urging people to enjoy it “with a crowd:”

“2025 is all about horror out of the gate, and Oz Perkins’ ‘The Monkey’ is a very good time – incredibly funny to the point people were cackling in my theater, but also dark, gory & brutal with some amazing kills. Very different from ‘Longlegs’ – Perkins flexing his range, tonally, delivering a film that very much enjoys monkeying around. You’ll jump and yell and cover your eyes, but you’ll definitely walk out smiling. No doubt you should watch this with a crowd.”

Davis continued, heaping praise on Theo James while wishing “there was more Elijah Wood” throughout the film:

“Theo James definitely brings it, the film asks a lot of him and he delivers. Wish there was more Elijah Wood, but not saying too much because I don’t want to spoil the film.”

Horror News’ Jacob Davison echoed Davis’ sentiments telling fans to “see it with a really big crowd to laugh and scream along with,” noting how it sets the stage for a great year of movies:

“Just saw ‘The Monkey’ and it was one mean but funny as hell horror comedy and Stephen King adaptation! You’ll want to see it with a big crowd to laugh and scream along with… Really sets the tone for 2025!”

The Monkey is Osgood Perkins’ lightest film yet,” opined Guy at the Movies’ Jeff Nelson, although he lamented the fact that its “dramatic underpinnings fall short:”

“‘The Monkey’ is Osgood Perkins’ lightest film yet, despite the heavy helping of gory monkey business. Genuinely funny when the comedy lands, but its dramatic underpinnings fall short.”

After a couple of viewings, slashfilm’s Bill Bria feels the film “keeps getting funnier” with each viewing:

Advertisement

“I’ve been lucky enough to see ‘The Monkey’ a couple times now, and it keeps getting funnier every time I see it. Oz Perkins shifts into a ‘Tales From the Crypt,’ ‘Creepshow’ mode by way of Morgan & Wong: a mean, grisly horror comedy riff on the impersonal fate which awaits us all.”

Describing The Monkey as “one of the most bat shit horror films” he’s seen in a long time, That Hashtag Show’s Junior Felix gave Perkins credit for going “full throttle” and bringing real consequences:

“‘The Monkey’ is one of the most Bat Shit crazy horror films I’ve seen in YEARS! Osgood Perkins goes full throttle in a demented film about facing consequences. A bloody, grizzly, hilariously bonkers film that tries to out do itself kill after kill.”

The Direct’s Russ Milheim called the new horror outing “an absolutely wild, brutal dark comedy” with creative deaths, saying that fans of Final Destination “will feel right at home:”

“‘The Monkey’ is an absolutely wild, brutal dark comedy filled with aggressively creative deaths that’ll keep audiences glued to their seats laughing the whole time. Fans of ‘Final Destination’ will feel right at home.”

Tessa Smith of Mama’s Geeky also compared The Monkey to Final Destination, describing the movie as “over the top in the very best way:”

“I can’t stop thinking about ‘The Monkey.’ It’s like ‘Final Destination’ on crack. Over the top in the very best way. I can’t wait to watch my friends watch it…”

What To Think of Strong Reviews for The Monkey

The Monkey will mark the first of a new round of horror movies coming in 2025, which is expected to be joined by movies like Five Nights at Freddy’s 2. It also has the advantage of getting to enjoy a theatrical release, which Salem’s Lot (the last King movie adaptation) did not.

While horror movies do not often perform well financially in theaters, King has a reputation as one of the great horror writers in history. With dozens of movie adaptations of books credited to him, he remains as popular a figure as any in the genre.

Advertisement

However, it will be challenged by heavy competition from other movies coming out close to that same release date. Most prominent from that perspective are Paddington in Peru and Captain America: Brave New World (and its popcorn buckets), both of which hit theaters one week prior to The Monkey

While movies of that caliber may keep The Monkey from reaching its highest potential, it should still be able to stand strong in the horror genre for those in search of a spook.


The Monkey is due to be released in theaters on February 21.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

‘Only Beautiful Things to Look At’ Review: A Handsome but Muffled Portrait of State-Sanctioned Cruelty

Published

on

‘Only Beautiful Things to Look At’ Review: A Handsome but Muffled Portrait of State-Sanctioned Cruelty

The fashions and furnishings of Czechoslovakia in the 1980s — the height of the state’s racist program of suppressing the Roma population through coerced sterilization — are painstakingly evoked in Slovakian filmmaker Ivan Ostrochovský’s “Only Beautiful Things to Look At.” But the film’s attractive yet oddly bloodless presentation gives the impression of a period drama set much farther back, as though we’re peering at the prettily mounted arrowheads and artifacts of a long-gone atrocity through museum glass. Alongside the decision to centralize the perspective of a white female doctor, this old-school, soft-focus approach robs an undeniably well-intentioned movie of a vital edge of urgency and discomfort, allowing viewers to consign the cruelties it outlines to some imaginary distant past, when in truth, the sterilization policy continued well into the 21st century in both the Czech and Slovak Republics. 

The film begins with a montage of young Roma women, each shot as though for a studio portrait, impassively absorbing an offscreen voice lecturing them about family planning. “Sterilization,” the voice concludes disingenuously, “allows Gypsy women to improve their family’s quality of life.” The intention behind the portraiture is noble: to put faces to a crime more often recounted in impersonal statistics, when it is acknowledged at all. But although framed and lit with dignity by cinematographer Juraj Chlpík, none of these Roma women speak. The first words of argument or protest we hear are from Ingrid (Anna Geislerová), the film’s white protagonist, and she is not talking about reproductive rights at all. Instead, she is facing an all-male panel of her peers as she interviews for the role of head doctor at the hospital where she works. Ingrid knows the position will very likely go to one of her male colleagues, but that doesn’t stop her being angry and disappointed when it actually does.

Outside her work at the hospital, which in large part comprises assessing and performing the sterilizations in a procedure that leaves patients with a small scar beneath the navel nicknamed “the bow,” Ingrid has what can only be described as a beautiful life. With her music teacher husband Maros (Vlad Ivanov), she lives in a gorgeous house in the countryside, where her bedroom, glass-paned on two sides overlooking a lush forest, looks almost like a fairytale princess’ lair. In the warm-lit evenings she and Maros read and drink wine and listen to classical music; on her days off she goes for walks in the forest or, when it’s hot, visits the nearby river and looks on benignly as Roma children bob along playfully on tire tubes.

It is only through her burgeoning friendship with Agata (a radiant Simona Boledovičová), a sweet-natured orderly who is reticent about her Romani idenitity, that Ingrid eventually starts to become uncomfortable with the work she does helping the hospital meet its government-recommended quotas for sterilizations. Ostrochovský’s film, co-written with Marek Leščák, is not anything quite as crude as a white savior narrative, but it is certainly one that assumes the best conduit for a wide audience to understand the cruelty visited on Czechoslovakian Roma families, is the moral awakening of a white woman. 

This faulty focus is particularly frustrating because Agata’s own story, and the manner in which she comes to reconcile herself with her Roma background, is by far the more intriguing narrative strand. As an orphan, Agata was separated from her sister Jula (an excellent Eva Mores), with each then going on to lead very different lives. Jula married within the Roma community, has had two children and is pregnant with an unwanted third. Agata, who at first barely acknowledges their connection, has been more independent, living with a roommate and working at the hospital, and recently getting serious with a boyfriend. “He’s white?” queries Jula in surprise when she hears that he’s a soldier. “Good for you.”

Advertisement

The tides of unspoken resentment and disapproval that flow between the sisters are fascinating, with Agata able to move between Jula’s world, in a cramped flat in a crumbling building where kids play in dirty stairwells, and Ingrid’s enviably refined domestic environment. Eventually, just like Chlpík’s limpid camera, Agata comes to see the beauty in both, when in the film’s most moving moment, the sisters tacitly reconcile while Jula’s kids splash about in the tub at bathtime. There would have been the opportunity here to probe the long-term consequences for the Roma women bearing “the bow,” many of whom had been conned into a procedure that was misrepresented to them, in a language they did not speak, or in documentation they could not read.

Instead, the film insistently returns us to Ingrid. As she’s kept awake by the first stirrings of her conscience, as she lazes in rumpled white bedsheets watching a beetle trundle across her pillow, as she’s depicted in macro close-ups that emphasize the blondeness of her hair, the fairness of her skin, the blueness of her eyes. Indeed, right up to a finale which resolves the remaining conflict with a rather glib miracle, the film’s loveliness practically becomes a liability, placing the real plight of the Roma several removes of perspective and aesthetic manipulation away, until you begin to wonder why we’re being given only beautiful things to look at, when there are so many ugly things that better warrant the attention. 

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie review: ‘Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass’ not quite ‘Wet Hot’ fun

Published

on

Movie review: ‘Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass’ not quite ‘Wet Hot’ fun

Comedy is a matter of taste and preference — it’s a deeply personal thing. Which makes it hard for a critic to give a blanket assessment of a specific kind of comedy, especially if it didn’t work for them, but clearly worked for others (the laughter or lack thereof is the indication). “It’s not funny,” the critic says, “well I had fun,” someone else can reply, and then we’re at an impasse.

Which is the dilemma one finds oneself in with “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass,” a very strange and shaggy Hollywood satire of sorts from David Wain and The State crew, still riding the goodwill of “Wet Hot American Summer” after all these years. If only this were as funny.

“Gail Daughtry” lives in the same world as that iconic summer camp spoof, as well as Wain’s 2014 rom-com parody, “They Came Together,” in that he’s playing with genre convention and expectation, taking well-known norms to the goofiest extremes. But those films hewed more closely to their respective genres, while “Gail Daughtry” is totally scattered, combining crime and spy movie tropes with a fish-out-of-water comedy and a Hollywood send-up. It has far too many ideas for its own good, and yet no ideas that are good enough to sustain this bizarre curio of a comedy.

What’s ironic is that one of the problems driving this wacky plot forward is the characters have to come up with a movie idea to pitch to star Jon Hamm (playing himself of course), leading them to do some pretty inane and shockingly violent things. It’s almost as if Wain and co-writer and co-star Ken Marino had no idea for a movie, then baked their search for an idea into their script, and then turned it into a madcap adventure about a woman on a quest to have sex with Jon Hamm. What an ouroboros!

OK, about the sex quest. Gail Daughtry (Zoey Deutch) is a chipper hairdresser from Kansas born without the part of the brain that recognizes sarcasm or irony. She’s a cheerful, Pollyanna-ish naïf whose literal-mindedness is almost as extreme as Amelia Bedelia. Her childhood sweetheart and fiancé Tom (Michael Cassidy) is the same. She tells him about the concept of the “celebrity sex pass” as a joke, and he promptly boinks Jennifer Aniston at local book reading.

Advertisement

(Nitpicky aside: why didn’t they use the common nomenclature “hall pass”? Is it copyrighted? “Celebrity sex pass” is clunky and sounds like an off-brand version of the well-known slang.)

That infidelity crisis is how Gail ends up in Los Angeles determined to bang Hamm, collecting a motley crew of similarly clueless helpers along the way. There’s her best friend Otto (Miles Guttierez-Riley), her salon bestie; Caleb (Ben Wang), an overly ambitious intern at Creative Artists Agency; Vince (Marino), a screenwriter turned paparazzo with a heart of gold; and John Slattery, as John Slattery, down on his luck. An accidental briefcase swap has a pair of thugs on their tail, in a forgettable and underdeveloped B-plot.

With a parade of celebrity cameos and collaborators in bit parts, “Gail Daughtry” at times feels like an excuse for Wain and co. to make something at home with all of their friends. Fair enough, it’s great to see all these people employed, but what about what we’re watching? Behold, the Los Angeles of the middle-aged working comedian: the CAA lobby, the Chateau Marmont, Griffith Park, etc. And the plot is as half-baked as the pitch they present to Hamm.

What’s actually interesting about this comedy is the distinct streak of despair and even resentment that reveals itself at the climax, a feeling of helplessness and uselessness. Everyone’s been striving to make it in this crazy town: the intern, the actor, the paparazzo. But not even Jon Hamm can help them get a movie made; even he feels inherently powerless. There’s an unexplored anxiety vibrating there that feels the most thematically fruitful, about what it means, some 25 years after bursting onto the scene with a generation-defining comedy, about maintaining the work, the drive, a sense of purpose, after years of strikes, and in the face of a constricting industry. Do they still have it? Is the dream still alive?

Maybe that’s why Wain and Marino need to invent a dreamer stand-in with Gail, a guileless eternal optimist who knows nothing of the craven Los Angeles and accepts everything at face value (though she is filled with a scary bit of rage too). She might behave like she has a head injury, but she’s going to achieve her goal, dammit. “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” might not be as funny as “Wet Hot American Summer” (for this critic), but reframed, it serves as a fascinating status update on life in La La Land for this troupe.

Advertisement

‘Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass’

2 stars (out of 4)

MPA rating: R (for sexual content, violence/bloody images and language)

Running time: 1:33

How to watch: In theaters July 10

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass’ Review: We’re Off to Hump the Wizard

Published

on

‘Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass’ Review: We’re Off to Hump the Wizard

Wainheads will be delighted to see his alums in cameos: Kerri Kenney-Silver, Michael Ian Black, Thomas Lennon, and supporting roles for Zickel and Truglio. A large portion of the cast are his homies. But with Deutch, Gutierrez-Riley, Wang, Slattery, Impacciatore, and yes, Hamm, it’s as if they’re being inducted into a new mad family. Wain and Marino are basically catching Pokémon and hoping they can hold onto the roster (by that logic, yes, Paul Rudd is a legendary Pokémon). The film is anchored by Zoey — everything everywhere all this summer with Voicemails From Isabelle to Minions & Monsters — Deutch in the Dorothy Gale role, exuding a high level of perkiness consistent with the character’s can-do, wide-eyed, midwestern charm and heart.  

A major standout, Ben Wang finally gets to show off his comedic abilities, portraying a self-assured, quick-witted agent who makes me laugh every time he reveals his sheltered upbringing in snappy whines at every inconvenience. Sabrina Impacciatore, who has proven to be a comedic juggernaut in The Paper, is having so much fun hamming it up as the mob boss-esque wicked witch counterpart, torturing her henchmen and deliciously chewing up the scenery whenever onscreen. I don’t think they use her to the height of her comedic prowess, but she’s a delight nonetheless.  John Slattery is the film’s comedic MVP. The way the writers use his over-the-top character for comedy is downright hilarious every time. They use him as either a punchline or a force of nature, and he’s great. This movie is like Mad Men propaganda, and by God, it works. As someone who’s never seen it, Gail allowed me a better appreciation for Slattery and Hamm. 

Man, we don’t deserve Jon Hamm. This is the second time I’ve seen him play a silly, fictionalized version of himself this year (the other being the SXSW crowd-pleasing rom-com Wishful Thinking, which Gail distributor Sony Pictures Classics acquired), and he also voice-acted in his comedic Mayor Jerry role in Hoppers. Maybe working with Wain in 2007’s The Ten was the canon event, but I consider his weird little sex scene with Kristen Wiig in Bridesmaids his awakening. Since then, I’ve only seen him as unserious, and it’s delightful. Oz-like in appearance, he’s funny and befitting the film’s overall light, joyful nature.

LAST STATEMENT

Ultimately, Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass is a campy, delightful romp that succeeds as both a distinctive Hollywood‑centric riff and a Wizard of Oz reimagining, retaining a loving, twisted, demented charm. It’s a weird description, but it’s so high‑spirited and light‑hearted despite being strangely ultraviolent. It might as well be a live‑action episode of Smiling Friends (RIP), yet it’s everything the theatrical market needs today. Ten years ago, this would’ve been a studio production rather than an indie Sundance acquisition, but thank God it exists for the big screen. More absurdist Gail Daughtrys for cinemas (not streaming), please, because this is the most fun to be had in a theater all summer, if not the year thus far.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending