Connect with us

Denver, CO

Owner-opposed landmark application filed for South Park Hill home

Published

on

Owner-opposed landmark application filed for South Park Hill home


In September 2022, a nearly century-old home in South Park Hill sold for the first time since the 1950s.

The new owners paid $2.5 million, records show — for the land. They’d like to demolish the structure and build something much larger, plans indicate.

But a handful of Denver residents are pushing to mandate preservation of the home.

The property in the 5000 block of E. Montview Blvd., along one of the neighborhood’s stately corridors, is Denver’s latest setting for an owner-opposed landmark application. Three women who live nearby, with the help of the nonprofit Historic Denver, submitted the application earlier this month.

Advertisement

“If this home is capable of being designated as a landmark, anyone buying or selling a home in Denver should be concerned,” said Mark Rinehart, who owns the home with his wife.

The application comes months after the Denver City Council approved an owner-opposed landmark application for just the second time ever. A subsequent lawsuit filed by the owner of that home in City Park West, a developer who hoped to build apartments, was recently paused.

Records show that Mark and Marianne Rinehart bought the two-story, 3,200-square-fot Park Hill home through a trust last year. Prior to that, another couple, now deceased, had owned it since 1959. The home is fenced off and unoccupied.

Mark Rinehart is a founder of Legal TV Leads, which helps personal injury attorneys with television advertising, according to his LinkedIn profile. He previously worked in advertising for Denver’s Fox31/KDVR.

A contractor working for the couple requested a demolition permit over the summer, records show. Following a regular process, city staff that reviewed the demolition request set aside time in case anyone wanted to lobby the city to name the structure a landmark.

Advertisement

Landmark designation effectively prevents demolition of a structure. The city generally sees a handful of owner-opposed landmark applications a year. Most don’t result in designation, but in some cases the owners and preservationists reach some sort of compromise, like in the case of the Tom’s Diner building along Colfax.

Owner-opposed landmark designation applications must be filed by at least three Denver residents. The one in Park Hill was filed by Margaret McRoberts, Trish Leary and Bernadette Kelly. Each indicated they live within a mile. Kelly and the CEO of Historic Denver, which helped draft the application, did not respond to separate requests for comment Friday.

The home dates to the mid-1930s. The applicants pointed to the home’s previous occupants, prominent location, architectural style and original homebuilder as reasons to preserve it.

The original residents were Harry Eugene Huffman and his wife Christina Mae. Huffman owned and managed movie theaters in the Denver area, according to the applicants. He later moved to the “Shangri-La” mansion he built at 150 S. Bellaire St. in Hilltop.

The Park Hill house was then owned by Robert and Betty McClennan Hawley. He was a lawyer, and she was a socialite and philanthropist, according to the applicants. Then came Universal Tractor Co. owners Alston McCarty and his wife Ann, who had the property for more than 60 years. The home was sold to the Rineharts after their deaths.

Advertisement

The home exemplifies the “simplified Italian Renaissance Revival” style, and was built by Douglas M. Sugg, according to the applicants.

“The home has been a prominent and familiar building along Montview Boulevard for over 89 years,” they wrote.

Denver’s landmark process only takes into account the exterior of a structure. Reached by BusinessDen, however, the first thing Rinehart did was email photos of the interior of 5013 E. Montview.

The photos show cracked walls and stained, deteriorating ceilings. The roof was not properly maintained, Rinehart said, which resulted in leaks and mold. The electrical system needs to be replaced, he said. The foundation has settled. An addition isn’t level with the rest of the home.

“As you can see from the pictures, it would take considerable work and expense to make the home safe to live in, much less structurally sound,” Rinehart said by email. “Because of the roof issues and water damage, I don’t even know how much of the original structure could even be salvaged.”

Advertisement

Plans submitted to the city earlier this year indicate the Rineharts want to build a new two-story brick home on the 0.43-acre lot. It would be about 7,500 square feet counting finished basement space, plans show. An outdoor pool was initially proposed, but later nixed.

Rinehart said nothing has been finalized, but the goal is to build a “forever family home” that “fits the character of the neighborhood and is consistent with the beautiful homes around it.” The family has lived elsewhere in Park Hill for over a decade.

Denver’s process for owner-opposed landmark applications requires those seeking preservation to attend mediation sessions with the property owner before filing. Three sessions were held, but the two sides “were unable to come to an agreement on a compromise between complete demolition and preservation of the original contributing structure,” according to the application.

Even if the physical condition of the home isn’t considered, Rinehart said he doesn’t think the home is worthy of being a landmark.

“It was built as a spec home by a home builder who was not well known for any style of architecture or unique home building qualities, and was lived in for a brief moment in time by someone who ultimately built a much more notable home in Denver: the Shangri La house,” he said.

Advertisement

The application will be reviewed by Denver’s Landmark Preservation Commission, which will decide whether to send it to the City Council for a vote.

Another owner-opposed landmark application could come in soon. Three individuals, including a Historic Denver employee, have signaled they might submit one for the home at 3601 E. 26th Ave., which faces City Park Golf Course in the Skyland neighborhood. They have until Nov. 27 to do so.

This story was reported by our partner BusinessDen.

Get more real estate and business news by signing up for our weekly newsletter, On the Block.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Denver, CO

Alexandar Georgiev reflects on trade, his time with Avalanche: “A lot of positivity”

Published

on

Alexandar Georgiev reflects on trade, his time with Avalanche: “A lot of positivity”


SAN JOSE — Alexandar Georgiev was traded on a Monday and he was in net for his new team barely more than 72 hours later.

It’s just a blur of logistics and text messages for anyone who gets traded in the middle of an NHL season. So much to figure out in such a short period of time.

Georgiev spent two-plus seasons as the starting goaltender for the Colorado Avalanche. Then, in an instant, he wasn’t. During all of the welcomes, goodbyes and “OK, what do I need to focus on next?” conversations, Georgiev did have some time to reflect on what just happened.

“I thought about it the evening after I got traded,” Georgiev told The Denver Post on Wednesday, a day before his new team, the San Jose Sharks, will face his former club. “The number that stood out for me was probably 95 wins in two years and two months. That’s a lot of good hockey.”

Advertisement

The Avalanche acquired Georgiev shortly after winning the Stanley Cup in 2022. Colorado has an established pattern of not expending a lot of salary cap space on its goaltenders, so after Darcy Kuemper helped the club to a championship and earned a big contract, it was with someone else.

The Avs signed Georgiev to a three-year contract. For the first two seasons, he provided a strong return on investment. Great first season, up-and-down second year, but a strong finish during the 2024 Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Then, in his contract year, things went off the rails. Georgiev started poorly, improved his play and then had more stumbles. His last two starts for the Avs were a snapshot of this season — pulled in the first period in Buffalo, then lights-out great in Detroit.

Colorado overhauled the positions in 10 days, first trading backup Justus Annunen for Scott Wedgewood, then flipping Georgiev, Nikolai Kovalenko and a second-round pick to San Jose for Mackenzie Blackwood and Givani Smith.

“Yeah, honestly not too much emotions, I would say,” Georgiev said. “It just happened. Management just made decisions. You do your job. They do theirs. You have to accept it.

Advertisement

“Obviously I was planning to keep going, to help get us in a playoff spot and fight for the (Stanley) Cup. But this is how it developed and I’m excited for a new chapter here.”

When the Avs made the second trade, Georgiev was ranked 79th out of 80 goaltenders in goals saved above expected, according to Money Puck. He has shown the ability to snap back from a deep funk before — just refer to the end of last season and Game 1 of the playoffs in Winnipeg, followed by his work the rest of that postseason. But Colorado’s decision-makers decided it was time to move on.

Georgiev has made two starts for the Sharks — a win in St. Louis three days after the trade, and a last-minute loss Tuesday night to Winnipeg.

“(Georgiev) has been good,” Sharks coach Ryan Warsofsky said. “He competes in there. He’s quick. I think he made some big saves when we needed them (Tuesday night). They had some really good chances before the tying goal and they could have easily gone up earlier than that. I thought he gave us a chance to win.”

This will be a new challenge for Georgiev. The Sharks have rebounded from a horrible start and appear to have a young, fun team on the rise. But that rise isn’t really expected to kick into high gear for another year or two. There are probably going to be some long nights and a lot of shots to face.

Advertisement

They also have a clear-cut goalie of the future. Yaroslav Askarov, just up from the AHL, was sitting about 15 feet to Georgiev’s left in the Sharks’ locker room after practice. Also in the room was Evgeni Nabokov, one of the greatest Russian goalies ever and part of San Jose’s front office.

Just like Blackwood, the future is very uncertain for Georgiev. Both goalies can be unrestricted free agents after this season. Georgiev should have a chance to rebuild his value with the Sharks, and getting to work with both Nabokov and Askarov could help determine if his future can be in San Jose.

The future is what’s most important now. There will be more time to reflect on the past once the future is settled.

“A lot of positivity,” Georgiev said of how he’d sum up his time in Denver. “It was a great group of guys. That was so awesome. The expectations were so high. That’s what I loved about it. It felt like we were fighting for something special. It’s all about the final goal, the Cup there. That was a lot of fun. I learned a ton.

“Winning is so much fun. Being in a position with a really, really good team and having that opportunity every night is just incredible. I’m happy I got to experience that, and I will experience that on another team again.”

Advertisement

Want more Avalanche news? Sign up for the Avalanche Insider to get all our NHL analysis.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Bo Nix talking Super Bowl as the Denver Broncos try to earn a playoff berth

Published

on

Bo Nix talking Super Bowl as the Denver Broncos try to earn a playoff berth


The Denver Broncos are one win away from earning a playoff berth. The Broncos (9-5) can clinch their first playoff berth since the 2015 season with a win Thursday against the Los Angeles Chargers.

Peyton Manning was the quarterback the last time the Broncos reached the playoffs.

Denver quarterback Bo Nix knows what’s a stake in the game against the Chargers (8-6), but he doesn’t want his teammates to view the game as a one-and-done in terms of earning a playoff berth. The rookie is thinking big.

“We’ve got three games to win three and go into the playoffs and win a Super Bowl,” Nix told reporters on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The Broncos have won four consecutive games, their longest winning streak since the 2023 season, when they won five consecutive games. Nix wants the Broncos to win their final three games of the regular season and enter the playoffs riding a seven-game winning streak.

However, if the Broncos want to extend their current streak and earn a playoff berth, they must defeat the Chargers.

“We’ve talked about it all year, ‘The next game is the most important game. Right now, this is what’s important to us. It’s the most important,” Nix told reporters on Tuesday. I think this next one would put us on track for where we want to go. So, we have a lot of work to do. The job’s not finished, so that’s what we’re going to do.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Economic hardship applications granted for Denver historic homeowners

Published

on

Economic hardship applications granted for Denver historic homeowners


Historic Denver buildings cause headache for owner

Advertisement


Historic Denver buildings cause headache for owner

00:33

Advertisement

The Denver Landmark Preservation Commission approved owners’ applications for economic hardship regarding two damaged historic homes.

This decision came after the owners requested the buildings to be demolished in June. A request that was denied.

The historic homes at 1600 Colfax Ave. and 1618 Colfax Ave. were built in 1895. Both buildings are located in the Wyman historic district.

Annie Levinsky, Executive Director of Historic Denver, Inc. explained their importance to the Denverite in a 2018 interview, stating the homes are some of the last of their kind along Colfax Ave.

The discussion on the fate of the structures has been ongoing. Community groups pushed back against the idea of demolition in 2018. At that point, the owners developed plans to restore and preserve the structures. However, they were never implemented. Construction costs increased from the beginning of the project planning in 2019 through 2022, the owners said, making the plan no longer feasible.

Advertisement

A fire at 1600 E Colfax Ave. in March 2024 caused significant damage to the structure. The owners said the structure was already deteriorating prior to the fire and the costs of restoration were too high.

The owners submitted applications to demolish the buildings in April 2024. After the commission denied their request, they filed appeals arguing that the cost to repair the homes outweighs the potential value after they’re restored. They claimed that the inability to demolish the buildings would cause economic hardship.

Estimates provided in the appeals state the rehabilitation of the 1600 structure reflects a negative value of $6 million, while the 1618 structure reflects a negative value of $4.1 million.

Both appeals were approved at the Commission’s Dec. 17, 2024 meeting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending