California
Who’s dying now? Here’s how recent COVID deaths compare to the early months of the pandemic in California
Four years after the start of the COVID pandemic, the age and race of its victims in California have dramatically shifted: Now, a Bay Area News Group analysis finds, those who are dying from the virus are much older, and more often White than Latino, a notable switch.
While COVID deaths in California have plunged across all race and age groups, a comparison of deaths from the first six months of the pandemic to the most recent six months of data compiled by the California Department of Public Health shows 70% of those dying nowadays are 75 or older — up from just over half in early 2020.
And while Latinos made up nearly half of all Californians killed by COVID in the first six months of the pandemic, White residents now account for nearly 60% of all deaths.
The changing demographics and plummeting overall death toll exhibit how Californians built up immunity to the virus, experts say, through exposures and vaccines, and which groups are now the most vulnerable to the worst outcomes.
After four years of living with the virus, life is largely back to pre-pandemic normal. But when the virus first shut down our lives in 2020, face masks and working from home were foreign concepts to most. And while the speed of developing the first COVD vaccines was unprecedented in science, it took until early 2021 — the heart of the pandemic’s deadliest wave — for the public to get immunized. While COVID’s risk has certainly diminished, how much has its deadly wake actually changed in that time?
First, the virus is much less deadly. In the most recent six months for which data is available, from Sept. 1, 2023, through Feb. 29, 2024, there were 3,472 deaths attributed to the virus in California. But in the first six months of the pandemic, Feb. 1 through Aug. 31, 2020, more than four times that number of Californians died from COVID — 14,648.
“Wow, we are doing so much better than we were,” said Dr. John Swartzberg, clinical professor emeritus at the UC Berkeley School of Public Health, his first reaction when looking at the data.
The total number of people dying has dropped across the board in nearly every category. More people over 85 died in the first six months of the pandemic, 4,209, than the number of deaths across all age groups in the past six months.
Second, your age is a factor. While older people have always been more vulnerable, they account for an even higher proportion of COVID deaths now.
The proportion of all COVID deaths among those 85 and older has grown from 29% to 42%. But that doesn’t mean the virus is deadlier for our elders: In the first six months of the pandemic, there were three times more deaths from the virus in that 85-and-older age group than there were in the most recent six-month period.
However small the number, there is one statistical peculiarity: The two youngest age groups are the only ones that saw more deaths in the past six months than early in the pandemic.
No deaths were reported among children younger than 14 in the Golden State through Aug. 31, 2020, but three young children have died from COVID, including two children under 5, in the last six months.
While deaths have become more concentrated among older Californians, another factor has changed dramatically: the racial breakdown of the people dying.
Early in the pandemic, “Blacks and Latinos struggled much more … in terms of mortality rates than any other population, primarily compared to Asian and White populations,” Swartzberg noted. “But that has flipped.”
The percentage of Californians who died who are White has nearly doubled, from 30% to 60% of all COVID deaths, from 4,332 deaths through August 2020, to 2,065 deaths in the most recent period. White people make up 37% of the state’s residents.
Moving in the other direction, the proportion of Latino deaths among those who died from COVID has shrunk from 49% of the first six months to just 20% of recent deaths. Latino people make up 39% of the state’s residents.
California’s Latino population is younger and therefore less at risk, Swartzberg said.
And he has some more educated guesses as to why the early pandemic death trends among racial groups have flipped so dramatically: In the first years of the pandemic, many Black and Latino communities were not getting vaccinated as quickly as their White counterparts, a combination of lack of access and insufficient outreach, but that has changed as the pandemic has evolved.
A November 2023 poll by KFF, a nonprofit health care research foundation, found a slightly higher percentage of Black and Hispanic adults reported getting an updated vaccine, compared to 19% of White adults. And the gap grew when adding those who planned on getting the new vaccine but hadn’t yet, 59% of Black and Hispanic adults and just 42% of White adults. The poll also found White adults were less likely to take precautions against catching and spreading the virus during this past holiday season.
Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, a UCSF professor of medicine who specializes in infectious diseases, also points to political influence on vaccine uptake as “one of the most compelling trends.”
The KFF poll found Democrats were twice as likely as Republicans to say they had already gotten the updated vaccine, while 55% of Republicans said they would “definitely not get” the new vaccine compared to 12% of Democrats and 40% of independents.
“In the beginning, none of this was political … we were all in this together,” said Chin-Hong. “The differential in mortality was based on structural racism and lack of access, underlying medical problems. But then it became a very polarizing issue, like everything regarding COVID.”
California
Nature: Cormorants in California
California
Raman closes in on Pratt as more votes in L.A. mayor’s race are tallied
Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman cut deeper into the lead of reality television personality Spencer Pratt on Saturday, as his lead slimmed to just a single percentage point.
Pratt fell to just over 27% of the vote while Raman jumped up to slightly over 26%, according to the results from the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder. Pratt now leads Raman by just 7,494 votes.
“We’ve seen Nithya Raman catching up on every update and the last two in particular she’s accelerated,” said Paul Mitchell, vice president of the bipartisan voter data firm Political Data Inc. “She’s continued to gain at a rate that means she will eventually catch up unless Pratt starts getting some ballots coming in that are either geographically or demographically better for him.”
Democratic consultant Michael Trujillo, who doesn’t represent anyone in the mayoral race, said the results suggest Raman will surpass Pratt as more votes are counted.
“I think it’s over,” Trujillo said. “It appears Nithya will be in the runoff. Pratt doesn’t appear to be growing much more.”
The second-place finisher in the mayoral primary will face Mayor Karen Bass in a Nov. 3 runoff. On election night Tuesday, the Associated Press determined that Bass had secured enough votes to qualify for the runoff.
Pratt has been in second place since then, but Raman has gradually eroded his lead as mail-in ballots have been counted. The updated vote tally released Thursday showed Pratt with 29% of the vote and Raman with 23%.
With Friday’s update, Raman’s share had risen to 25% and Pratt’s shrank to 28%, for a 3 percentage point gap.
In the most recent batch of mail-in ballots counted, Raman received 23,514 votes, while Pratt gained 10,336.
Election analysts expected Raman to gain ground as the mail-in ballots were tallied, reasoning that many left-of-center voters — Raman’s base — held onto their mail-in ballots until the last minute as they waited to choose between Democratic gubernatorial candidates. They also say younger, more progressive voters tend to hold onto their ballots longer generally.
Although the mayor’s race is nonpartisan, Pratt is a Republican in a city that is overwhelmingly dominated by Democratic voters and elected officials.
A poll by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, which was co-sponsored by The Times, had Pratt running in third place behind Bass and Raman.
The poll of 1,351 likely voters conducted May 19-24 had Bass with 26% support, Raman with 25% support and Pratt with 22% support, with a 3% margin of error.
Los Angeles voters have become accustomed to seeing election results change as late-arriving ballots are tabulated. In the 2022 mayoral primary, real estate developer Rick Caruso led the pack for about a week before Bass pulled ahead.
Pratt was favored in many of the same neighborhoods that voted for Caruso, according to a Times analysis of precinct-level returns provided by the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder on Wednesday, when an estimated 62% of the projected vote had been counted. Raman, by comparison, made inroads in progressive areas dominated by Bass four years ago.
Pratt, whose Pacific Palisades fire home burned in the January 2025 fire, was strong there and on the Westside, as well as in the San Fernando Valley communities of Encino, Woodland Hills, Chatsworth and Sunland-Tujunga.
Raman dominated precincts known for their progressive politics, particularly those with younger people in renter-heavy neighborhoods stretching from Hollywood to Highland Park, including her home base of Silver Lake.
Mail-in ballots with an election day postmark will continue to be accepted by county election officials through Tuesday.
California
Kars4Kids jingle can stay on California airwaves, court rules
The familiar Kars4Kids jingle will continue playing across California for now after a state appeals court sided with the charity in its ongoing legal fight over the ads.
On June 4, a California appeals court ruled that Kars4Kids can keep airing its advertisements in the state while it challenges a lower court decision that found the commercials deceptive.
The order temporarily pauses a judge’s ruling that would have prohibited the New Jersey-based vehicle donation charity from running the ads in their current form. The appeals court did not address the merits of the case, which remains under review.
The decision marks an important victory for Kars4Kids, whose fundraising operation relies heavily on the nationally recognized “1-877-Kars4Kids” advertising campaign. For now, the well-known jingle will remain on California airwaves as the nonprofit pursues its appeal.
Kars4Kids welcomes ruling
“Kars4Kids applauds (the) court ruling allowing its ads to continue airing in California while the appeals process continues,” the organization said in a statement provided to USA TODAY.
“Kars4Kids’ programs benefit a wide array of children and teenagers in California and beyond. The uninterrupted airing of its ads will enable the charity to continue funding its programs for children and families.”
The organization said it believes the trial court’s findings were flawed and intends to pursue a broad appeal.
What the lawsuit alleged
The case was brought by California resident Bruce Puterbaugh, who said he donated a vehicle believing the charity primarily benefited needy children, and was unaware of its ties to Oorah, an Orthodox Jewish outreach organization based in New Jersey.
In May 2026, Orange County Superior Court Judge Gassia Apkarian ruled that Kars4Kids’ advertising violated California’s false advertising and unfair competition laws because it failed to adequately disclose the organization’s religious affiliation and where donated funds ultimately go. The judge ordered the ads removed in their current form and awarded Puterbaugh $250 in restitution.
Broader debate over the charity
Kars4Kids has rejected the ruling, arguing on its website that the court overlooked evidence showing that donations support mentoring programs, educational assistance, summer camps and grants to nonprofit organizations, including some in California.
The dispute has renewed scrutiny of Kars4Kids’ fundraising practices. A recent investigation by the Asbury Park Press, part of the USA TODAY Network, found that the charity has faced scrutiny in multiple states over disclosure practices and spent $41.5 million on advertising in 2024, more than it distributed to Oorah that year. Charity officials have defended those expenses as necessary to generate vehicle donations that fund their programs.
Contributing: Joe Strupp, Asbury Park Press, part of the USA TODAY Network; USA TODAY reporter Drew Pittock
Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com, or on X @athompsonUSAT.
-
Lifestyle16 seconds agoSunday Puzzle: NBA Team Names
-
Technology10 minutes agoThe 7 biggest storylines from Summer Game Fest 2026
-
World15 minutes agoSuspected Hamas terrorist arrested in Greece for allegedly plotting attack on Israeli cruise ship
-
Politics22 minutes agoSpencer Pratt’s runner-up edge over Democrat Raman down to 1%, few thousand ballots
-
Health25 minutes agoThis exercise habit may slash dementia risk and help you live longer, study finds
-
Sports30 minutes agoDanish soccer star suffers medical scare during match years after on-field cardiac arrest
-
Technology37 minutes agoIs Apple Intelligence on your iPhone really secure?
-
Business40 minutes agoMore airlines suspend LAX routes due to high fuel costs