Connect with us

California

Garnet Blows Up, and Making California Forestry More Wildfire Resilient. – The Lookout

Published

on

Garnet Blows Up, and Making California Forestry More Wildfire Resilient. – The Lookout


The Garnet Fire has gobbled about 20 square miles in the past 12 hours. We’ll catch you up on where this new growth is happening.

Also, a meandering conversation about the complicated world of California forestry, and the many economic obstacles of pivoting the industry to more wildfire resilient practices.

Lookout Livestream

AI Summary, edited by Zeke.

The Garnet fire in Fresno expanded by 20 square miles, crossing Dinkey Creek and threatening McKinley Grove. The fire is being driven by extreme fuel loading, inaccessible terrain, and long-range spotting. The fire’s intensity is attributed to the lack of recent fire history, and heavy drought-induced tree mortality, which has left extremely loading of dead and down fuels. The fire’s progression was monitored via Delilah and Fence Meadow cameras, and by IR mapping of the fire from the night of 9/6, an IR satelliteimage taken at noon on 9/7, and IR flights at 13:30 and 16:30 on 9/7.

Advertisement

The discussion also covered the broader implications of fire management, including the role of private timberland owners, the impact of climate change, and the challenges of prescribed fire implementation. The conversation highlighted the need for comprehensive forest management strategies that are focused on what the fuels look like after the logging is complete. Zeke Lunder discusses the complexities of forestry and biomass energy, highlighting the economic challenges of financing new power plants, and the need for long-term sources of fuels to keep the plants running over the life of the investment in the plant. He notes that biomass power plants don’t pencil out without subsidies being paid to the operators. Lunder emphasizes the need for sustainable logging practices to manage fuel loads and reduce fire hazards. He mentions the historical role of logging in creating today’s overstocked forests, and how the removal of the largest trees has created more fire-prone forest structures. Lunder also highlights the need for community involvement in forest management and advocates for better education on sustainable practices. He promotes his website for more in-depth discussions on forest management and ecology.

Garnet Fire Overview and Initial Discussion

  • Zeke Lunder introduces the Lookout Sunday edition, focusing on the Garnet Fire in Fresno.
  • The Garnet fire has significantly increased in size, adding about 20 square miles today.
  • Zeke discusses the geography of the central and southern Sierra, including the Kings River and Dinkey Creek.
  • The fire has been active near Dinky Creek, with significant burning observed from the Delilah camera.

Fire Operations and Geographic Context

  • Zeke explains the firing operations along the road and the north end of the fire.
  • The current fire spread is aided by long-range spotting. The biggest obstacle to containment of the fire is the lack of access.
  • The fire has made a significant run into the area below McKinley Grove.

Fire Behavior and Contingency Lines

  • The fire crossed Dinkey Creek and a large area has burned burn up the slope towards and around Oak Flat campground.
  • The fire has been dramatic to watch on the Fence Meadow camera, with significant burning observed.
  • A contingency line has been built to try to hold the fire, with infrared flights showing the fire hasn’t crossed it in a big way.
  • The fire is likely to burn all the way to Camp Fresno, with no significant structures in the immediate area.

Private Industry and Fire Management

  • Zeke discusses the role of private industry in managing forests and the challenges they face.
  • The timber industry has been doing significant work in salvage logging and replanting after large fires in the past 15 years.
  • The industry is facing challenges in managing forests due to the impact of climate change and their inability to use fire as a management tool.
  • The industry is receiving more grant money to do fuel breaks and replanting in recently burned areas.

Historical Context and Legal Challenges

  • The Moonlight Fire in 2007 led to significant legal wrangling between Sierra Pacific Industries and Federal government.
  • The fire started on private land and burned federal land, leading to a $100 million fine for Sierra Pacific Industries.
  • The legal precedent has made private timber companies hesitant to burn on their land.
  • The industry has been largely-focused on cutting dead trees killed by the fires of the past decade, leaving limited capacity to actively manage unburned lands, especially on smaller landholdings.

Prioritizing Suppression over Land Management

Zeke argues that firefighting receives far more resources, flexibility, and funding compared to hazard mitigation. Specifically, he points out:

  1. Suppression Budget
  • Firefighting never has to justify its budget during an active incident
  • Agencies spend massive amounts (like $5 million in retardant in a single day on a large fire)
  • No environmental documentation required for emergency actions – bulldozers can do whatever they want.
  1. Regulatory Constraints on Mitigation
  • Prescribed fire and forest thinning require:- Years of studies and environmental surveys – Extensive rare plant reviews – Strict regulatory hurdles
  1. Resource Allocation
  • During wildfires, agencies get:- Unlimited resources – Flexible regulations – Catering – Full contractor support
  1. Mitigation Challenges
  • Prescribed fire and thinning face significant bureaucratic obstacles
  • Limited funding and regulatory support
  • Difficult to implement large-scale projects

His key argument is: “Until we give prescribed fire and fuels management the same leeway, environmentally, budget-wise, and resources as suppression, we’re just talking.” Zeke suggests agencies should “take off the gloves” and apply the same aggressive, well-resourced approach to forest management that they use during firefighting.

Future of Fire Management and Prescribed Fire

  • Zeke discusses the need for prescribed fire and thinning to manage forests, he posits that one of the only good reasons to do large fuel breaks in remote areas is to be able to burn the lands adjacent to them.

On ‘Environmentalism’

Zeke strongly criticizes national environmental groups like Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) for their simplistic approach to forest policy. He argues they:

  1. Pander to donors with oversimplified messaging like “logging is bad”
  2. Lack understanding of regional forest management nuances
  3. Want sound-bite management strategies
  4. Aim to stop commercial timber sales without considering local complexities
  5. Equate logging with tropical deforestation, and little else
  6. Are not interested in nuanced forest management solutions

He specifically advises people to stop donating to these national groups and instead support local organizations like prescribed burn associations that understand local forest management needs.

Biomass Power Plants and Carbon Emissions

According to Zeke, national environmental groups like NRDC oppose biomass thinning primarily because they argue it’s not carbon neutral, and contributes to global warming. Zeke disagrees with this stance, suggesting that biomass harvesting can actually help preserve healthy forests by creating economic incentives for thinning and removing sub-merchantable wood that could fuel wildfires.
He criticizes these groups for taking a blanket position against biomass without considering the potential forest management benefits, especially in areas which are exposed to extreme fire hazards that still have green forests.

  • Zeke Lunder discusses the survival of certain plants post-Dixie and the need for a comprehensive plan.
  • He mentions the environmental impact of biomass power plants, which emit carbon dioxide.
  • Zeke highlights the economic challenges of building and maintaining biomass power plants.
  • The discussion includes the reliance on sub-merchantable wood and the impact of natural disasters like the Dixie fire on biomass plant operations.

Economic Feasibility of Biomass Plants

  • Zeke explains that large biomass-energy plants in California were initially subsidized by utilities to make them economically viable.
  • He emphasizes the high costs of moving and processing wood for biomass plants.
  • The conversation touches on the need for subsidies to support biomass energy production.
  • Zeke mentions the role of local plants in creating local power and reducing the need for high-voltage transmission lines.

Zeke highlights several key economic constraints for building biomass power plants:

  1. High Initial Cost
  • Costs $50-200 million to build a biomass plant
  • Requires long-term investment (40-50 years)
  1. Fuel Supply Challenges
  • Requires consistent supply of sub-merchantable wood
  • Fires or forest destruction can disrupt local wood supply
  • May require expensive wood transportation from distant areas
  1. Lack of Economic Viability
  • Without government subsidies, plants are not financially sustainable
  • Cost of moving, chipping, and hauling wood is prohibitively expensive
  • Utilities need financial incentives to purchase biomass-generated energy
  1. Market Uncertainty
  • Climate change and mega fires create unpredictability in wood supply
  • Investors are hesitant to commit to long-term infrastructure with uncertain future forest conditions
  1. Operational Risks
  • A major fire destroying local forests can quickly make a biomass plant’s wood supply unsustainable
  • High operational costs compared to traditional energy generation

Zeke suggests that without consistent government subsidies and a stable wood supply, biomass power plants are economically challenging to develop and maintain.

Logging and Fire Management

  • Zeke Lunder discusses the historical role of logging in reducing fire hazards.
  • He explains the impact of climate change and fire suppression on modern fire risks on lands which were heavily logged in the 20th century.
  • The conversation includes the need for sustainable logging practices to manage fuel loads.
  • Zeke highlights the high costs of cleaning up slash and the reluctance of timber companies to invest in this process.

Community Involvement in Forest Management

  • Zeke suggests encouraging public participation in forest management through activities like cutting small trees around campgrounds.
  • He discusses the potential for community members to manage small-scale forest thinning.
  • The conversation includes the need for basic knowledge and guidelines for public forest management.
  • Zeke emphasizes the importance of active forest management to prevent fire hazards.
  • Zeke suggests bringing back the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) or similar programs for forest management.

Promoting Forest Management Knowledge

  • Zeke encourages people to visit the Lookout website for more information on forest management.
  • He highlights the various topics covered on the website, including forest ecology and management history.
  • The conversation includes a call for subscribers to support the Lookout’s work.
  • Zeke mentions upcoming interviews and projects focused on forest management and ecology.

 



Source link

Advertisement

California

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly

Published

on

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:43AM

CA bill to keep police from moonlighting with ICE advances

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KABC) — A bill that would prevent police officers from moonlighting with federal immigration enforcement agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is advancing through the California State Assembly.

AB 1537 passed the State Assembly’s committee on public safety on Tuesday.

The bill also requires that officers report any offers for secondary employment related to immigration enforcement to their place of work.

Those failing to comply could face decertification as a peace officer in California.

Advertisement

The bill was introduced by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, whose district includes Mar Vista, Ladera Heights, Mid-Wilshire and parts of South Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say

Published

on

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say


play

California Democrats running for governor, your party has a message for you. Think carefully about your candidacy and campaign ahead of the swiftly approaching filing deadline.

California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks urged candidates looking to assume the state’s highest office to “honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign” as March 6, the final day to declare candidacy, nears. Hicks said that concerns about the crowded field of Democrat candidates “persist” in an open letter on Tuesday, March 3.

Advertisement

It comes as five leading candidates, several of which are Democrats — Katie Porter, Eric Swalwell, and Tom Steyer — are in a “virtual tie” per a recent poll, the Desert Sun reported, which is part of the USA TODAY Network.

Two Republican candidates pushing out California democrats in the gubernatorial bid may be “implausible,” but “it is not impossible,” Hicks said of the reasoning behind his latest message. Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, both Republicans, lead in RealClear Polling’s average of various polls.

The party chair spotlighted the need for California Democrats’ leadership, particularly over Proposition 50, the voter-approved measure that will temporarily implement new congressional district maps, paving the way for Democrats to secure more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“If in the unlikely event a Democrat failed to proceed to the general election for governor, there could be the potential for depressed Democratic turnout in California in November,” Hicks said. “The result would present a real risk to winning the congressional seats required and imperil Democrats’ chances to retake the House, cut Donald Trump’s term in half, and spare our nation from the pain many have endured since January 2025.”

Advertisement

During a press conference on March 2, Gov. Gavin Newsom said that when he is out in communities, people aren’t talking about the governor’s race. It’s an observation he called “interesting,” considering voting in the primary election starts in May.

“It’s been hard, I think, to focus on that race,” Newsom said, pointing to the attention on President Donald Trump, redistricting, and other matters.

What exactly is California Democratic Party asking of candidates?

In his open letter, Hicks gave directions to candidates.

First, assess your candidacy and campaign. If you don’t have a viable path to the general election, don’t file to get your name on the ballot for the primary election in June. Also, be prepared to suspend your campaign and endorse another candidate by April 15 if you decide to file but can’t show “meaningful progress towards winning the primary election.”

Advertisement

When is the next California election? Primary election in 2026

California voters will trim the field of candidates for governor on June 2. Only the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party preference, will move on to the November election.  

Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at pbarraza@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Supreme Court blocks California law limiting schools from telling parents about trans students

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks California law limiting schools from telling parents about trans students


The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a California law that limited when schools could require staff to disclose a student’s gender identity, clearing the way for schools to tell parents if their children identify as transgender without getting the students’ approval.

Rear view of multiracial students with hands raised in classroom at high school

The decision came after religious parents and educators, represented by the Thomas More Society, challenged California school policies aimed at preventing staff from disclosing a student’s gender identity.

Erwin Chemerinsky, dean and professor of law at the University of California Berkeley School of Law, said the ruling favors parents’ ability to be informed. “The Supreme Court today rules in favor of the claim of parents to be able to know the gender identity and gender pronoun of the children,” Chemerinsky said.

Advertisement
FILE:{ }transgender flag against blue sky background { }(Photo: AdobeStock)

FILE:{ }transgender flag against blue sky background { }(Photo: AdobeStock)

The decision temporarily blocks a state law that bans automatic parental notification requirements if students change their pronouns or gender expression at school. The Thomas More Society called the decision a major victory for parents, saying the court found California’s policy likely violates constitutional rights.

Chemerinsky said the Supreme Court’s action is an emergency ruling. “This law is now put on hold. So what this means is that schools can require that teachers and other staff inform parents of the gender identity or gender pronouns of children,” he said.

scotus.PNG

Kathie Moehlig, founder and executive director of Trans Family Support Services, said she is concerned about how the ruling could affect students who do not have supportive families.

“I am really concerned about our kids that do come from these non affirming homes, that they know that they’re going to get in trouble, that they’re going to possibly have violence brought against them possibly kicked out of their homes,” Moehlig said.

Moehlig said parents should eventually know, but that the conversation should happen when a student feels safe. “Our students are going to be less inclined to confide in any adults that might be able to help to get them access to mental healthcare, to a support system. They may still tell their peers but they’re certainly not going to tell any other adult,” she said.

Advertisement

Equality California, a LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, shared a statement:

Equality California, the nation’s largest statewide LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, released the following statement from Executive Director Tony Hoang in response to today’s U.S. Supreme Court shadow docket ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta regarding California’s student privacy protections for transgender youth. Today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in this case is deeply disturbing. By stepping in on an emergency basis, the Court has effectively upended California’s student privacy protections without hearing full arguments and before the judicial process has run its course. While not surprising, this move reflects a dangerous willingness to short-circuit the established judicial process to dismantle protections for transgender youth. While this case continues to be litigated, the ruling revives Judge Benitez’s prior decision, which broadly targets numerous California laws protecting transgender and gender-nonconforming students — threatening critical safeguards that prevent forced outing and allow educators to respect a student’s affirmed name and pronouns at school. These protections exist for one reason: to keep students safe and ensure schools remain places where young people can learn and thrive without fear. To be clear: today’s decision does not impact California’s SAFETY Act, which prohibits school districts from adopting policies that forcibly out transgender students. The SAFETY Act remains in full effect, and we will continue defending it. Transgender youth deserve dignity, safety, and the freedom to learn without fear. We will never stop fighting for transgender youth and their families. Equality California will continue working with parents, educators, and advocates to ensure schools remain safe, welcoming, and focused on the success and well-being of every student.

The case now returns to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which will decide whether the California law is constitutional.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending