Connect with us

Alaska

As Alaskans consider a constitutional convention, advocates say it could end gridlock in Juneau. Opponents say it would open a ‘Pandora’s box.’

Published

on

As Alaskans consider a constitutional convention, advocates say it could end gridlock in Juneau. Opponents say it would open a ‘Pandora’s box.’


The main group encouraging Alaskans to vote sure for a constitutional conference this November is led by conservatives emphasizing that it may finish gridlock within the state Capitol — notably with the Everlasting Fund dividend. The main bipartisan group campaigning towards a conference argues it’s not needed and that it may result in chaos.

The constitutional conference query seems on the poll each 10 years. It has been soundly defeated in latest many years, however supporters and opponents each agree that it seems to be operating nearer this yr based mostly on polling.

Except the Legislature passes a unique guiding regulation, a conference would usually observe the principles used for the 1955 conference, which drafted Alaska’s Structure earlier than statehood. That implies that if it’s accredited within the November election, Alaskans would seemingly vote in the course of the 2024 election to decide on delegates, which might embody sitting legislators. Value estimates for a conference vary from a number of million {dollars} to upward of $20 million.

Supporters stress that any draft modifications to the structure accredited by way of a conference would then must go earlier than Alaska voters, seemingly in 2026. If a majority didn’t help them, these proposed modifications can be rejected.

Advertisement

Opponents say that’s nonetheless too dangerous and that Exterior particular pursuits would flood in main as much as the conference and in the course of the conference itself to advocate for their very own priorities.

Republican former Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell is the chair of Conference YES, a gaggle fashioned in August. Campbell, who mentioned he hasn’t supported a conference till this yr, believes the state is in “disaster” and that it’s time for a wholesale have a look at Alaska’s governing constructions.

“Our group will emphasize the truth that within the final decade the execution of the Legislature, the method of the Everlasting Fund, the actions of the courtroom system, the failure of the schooling system, have all created an atmosphere the place we have to return and have a constitutional conference,” he mentioned.

The PFD has been a spotlight for the sure marketing campaign. A number of main conference opponents have argued that’s as a result of resolving the dividend query is broadly fashionable, nevertheless it helps masks help for extra contentious conservative objectives like ending abortion entry and increasing college alternative.

Final yr, a gaggle known as Defend Our Structure fashioned to oppose a conference. The marketing campaign is stressing that there can be no restrictions on the draft constitutional modifications it would approve.

Advertisement

“We simply don’t know what’s in Pandora’s field and there’s no cause to open it,” mentioned marketing campaign chair Bruce Botelho, a former state legal professional normal who served beneath Democratic Alaska Gov. Tony Knowles. “There are not any imminent threats to the social, financial or governmental framework that necessitates a conference.”

The perceived dangers of a conference have led a bipartisan group of lots of of distinguished Alaskans to signal on to oppose a conference, together with 98-year-old Vic Fischer, the final surviving delegate of the 1955 conference.

constitutionl

The group has an inventory of greater than 40 organizations against a conference from the Alaska Miners Affiliation, which is all for defending entry to assets, to 5 chambers of commerce, which argue that it will carry uncertainty to Alaska’s enterprise local weather.

[Alaska Public Media and the UAA Debate Team is set to a host constitutional convention debate, joined by moderators from the ADN and the Alaska Beacon, on Thursday Sep. 29 at 7 p.m. in the Wendy Williamson Auditorium at UAA. It will also be livestreamed.]

The no marketing campaign is emphasizing potential impacts to public lands entry, taxation and useful resource improvement whereas highlighting that the Alaska Structure can already be modified with no conference. Two-thirds of the Alaska Home of Representatives and the Senate can vote for an modification and it will be adopted if a easy majority of voters then supported it. The Alaska Structure has been amended 28 occasions that means, the final time in 2004.

Advertisement

The query doesn’t break up alongside get together traces, however it might break up administrations. Former Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski is towards a conference, however his lieutenant governor, fellow Republican Loren Leman, needs one.

The Alaska Democratic Occasion is against a conference. The Alaska Republican Occasion’s State Central Committee debated a movement to help a conference in July. It did not cross.

The Alaska Libertarian Occasion needs some particular modifications to the structure however it’s towards a conference, saying that beneath the present political local weather, the get together doesn’t consider it will profit Alaskans or particular person liberty. The conservative Alaska Independence Occasion, headed by Bob Chicken, is strongly in favor of a constitutional conference, having campaigned for one for many years.

Among the many teams supporting the measure: the conservative Christian advocacy group the Alaska Household Council. A number of sitting conservative Republican legislators have come out publicly in favor of a conference. No sitting Democrats or unbiased legislators have indicated help for a conference.

‘Cease the steal!’

Since then-Gov. Invoice Walker vetoed half the dividend in 2016 with the Legislature deadlocked on the best way to scale back a multibillion-dollar deficit, the dimensions of the PFD has been determined annually as a part of the annual funds making course of. Political consultants say that has led to widespread dissatisfaction with the political course of and the path the state is shifting in.

Advertisement

Conference YES has made {that a} focus of its marketing campaign. It held rallies in 4 Alaska cities Tuesday when the PFD began to be distributed to say, “Cease the steal!” Marketing campaign member Jake Libbey, writer of the conservative Christian information web site the Alaska Watchman, appeared in a web based commercial on the identical day to reiterate the message.

“On Sept. 20, PFD day, state legislators placed on cloaks and snuck into your checking account and stole nearly $1,000 from you and each member of your loved ones,” he mentioned

Alaska Legislature

Regardless of that messaging suggesting help for a full statutory dividend, Sen. Shelley Hughes, R-Palmer, mentioned the marketing campaign isn’t essentially saying the 1982 dividend system needs to be put into the structure as a result of that would “paint delegates right into a nook” and require ever-increasing broad-based taxes to pay for it. As an alternative, delegates ought to talk about a “complete” fiscal plan with a state spending cap paired with a brand new dividend mannequin, she mentioned.

Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy has mentioned he’ll keep impartial on the constitutional conference query, however he has advocated for related constitutional amendments up to now. He and Conference YES have each mentioned Alaskans needs to be trusted to make the choice themselves and highlighted the safeguards in place to forestall “loopy” outcomes.

Matt Shuckerow, a former Dunleavy workers member and present spokesman for Defend Our Structure, mentioned there are not any certainties that the dividend difficulty, or another particular coverage purpose, can be resolved by way of a constitutional conference.

Advertisement

Supporters have mentioned a conference may approve a sequence of amendments that go earlier than voters for an up-or-down vote. Shuckerow mentioned that mannequin just isn’t assured; extra fashionable draft modifications could possibly be packaged along with unpopular ones as soon as horse buying and selling begins. The entire structure can be opened up and something could possibly be modified, he mentioned. Or nothing.

A number of opponents of a conference have argued that Conference YES’ deal with the dividend is getting used to masks plans to enact much less fashionable conservative insurance policies. Campbell was on conservative Christian Jim Minnery’s radio present in June and the 2 males mentioned their three priorities for holding a conference: college alternative, judicial reform, and opposition to abortion.

Campbell argues that Alaska’s public college system is resulting in poor outcomes and that it’s run by an “extremely liberal group.” If college alternative is allowed, he believes that “a majority of scholars will exit of the general public college system.”

The Alaska Structure mandates funding for a system of public colleges throughout the state, and prohibits funding in most situations for personal and spiritual colleges. Tom Klaameyer, president of the Nationwide Training Affiliation of Alaska, mentioned the ensures from that provision are why the state academics union donated $50,000 to oppose a conference.

“We do view it as one of many largest threats to public schooling proper now,” he mentioned. “We take it very severely.”

Advertisement

Final month, Campbell mentioned his private precedence is altering how judges are appointed in Alaska. The unbiased Alaska Judicial Council at present selects a number of candidates earlier than one is chosen by the governor, a system that supporters say has resulted in a nonpartisan judiciary and a merit-based judicial choice course of. However distinguished conservatives have lengthy argued it has resulted in “liberal” courtroom selections, corresponding to on abortion.

When the U.S. Supreme Courtroom overturned Roe vs. Wade in June, it had no fast influence in Alaska as a result of state courts have repeatedly dominated that the Alaska Structure’s privateness clause extends to abortion entry.

Minnery, president of the conservative Christian advocacy group the Alaska Household Council, had lengthy ready for the day and thought it was auspicious {that a} constitutional conference vote can be on the poll a number of months later.

“I’ve used the phrase fortuitous, however I might even say, ‘divinely appointed’ for these of us who consider that God controls the heavens and the earth,” he mentioned on the time.

Hughes, an abortion opponent, was the lead supporter of a constitutional modification she launched to exclude the process from the structure’s privateness protections and permit the Legislature to make abortion selections by way of statute. The modification did not cross and each side of the abortion debate say a constitutional conference is the probably means that abortion entry would change in Alaska.

Advertisement

The Alaska Household Council needs to finish abortion in Alaska whereas it stays impartial on the PFD debates as its members have a various set of opinions on the dividend. As a member of the steering committee for Conference YES, Minnery is staying centered on campaigning to finish gridlock, saying conference supporters are coming at it from all angles, like wanting to finish ranked alternative voting after Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola’s particular election victory.

“If the story is just on abortion, it’s sort of lacking the purpose as a result of there’s an entire slew of issues that may be addressed by a constitutional conference. And guaranteeing that the courts can’t manufacture a proper to abortion is simply a kind of,” Minnery mentioned just lately.

Conference YES has not centered its marketing campaign on ending abortion entry in Alaska, regardless of distinguished members having lengthy known as for that. That could possibly be as a result of polling has constantly proven round 60% of Alaskans are in favor of authorized abortion, and political consultants say it is a matter driving left-leaning Alaskans to the poll field this election cycle.

Defend Our Structure, the main group towards a conference, just isn’t campaigning on abortion both as a result of its various group of members don’t have a unified place on the process. With neither main marketing campaign centered on abortion, one other group fashioned in August is filling the void. The American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska and the Alaska Heart’s Training Fund established “Shield Our Rights: No on 1.”

The group is operating individually to Defend Our Structure, however shares its objectives to oppose a conference. A spokesperson for the Alaska Heart mentioned it will be campaigning to guard subsistence rights, entry to voting, and blocking threats to non-public privateness.

Advertisement

“Our group’s function is targeted solely on ensuring voters are knowledgeable concerning the methods a conference dangers giving the federal government the power to intrude upon Alaskans’ private lives and intrude with their private medical selections, together with abortion,” mentioned Michael Garvey, the ACLU of Alaska’s advocacy director, by way of a ready assertion.

With different excessive profile contests, Botelho mentioned it’s unsurprising that in any other case politically engaged Alaskans have been unaware that the constitutional conference query is on the poll. However the campaigns have began to ramp up.

Cash has poured into Defend Our Structure’s coffers and it had raised $834,000 by Sept.10. The Sixteen Thirty Fund, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit described by the New York Instances as a left-leaning darkish cash group, donated $500,000.

A spokesperson for the Sixteen Thirty Fund mentioned by e-mail merely, “That (it) helps campaigns and causes throughout the nation, together with the nonpartisan No on 1 Defend Our Structure marketing campaign. We’re proud to help Defend Our Structure.”

That donation has helped sparked criticism that the no marketing campaign is supported by particular pursuits interfering with Alaska’s political course of. Botelho mentioned he gained’t apologize for getting donations from Exterior because the marketing campaign has sought to make sure it might ship a message to all Alaskans why a conference can be a mistake.

Advertisement

Different main donors to the no marketing campaign are unions. The Worldwide Brotherhood of Electrical Employees’ political motion committee donated $50,000 together with $50,000 from the American Federation of Lecturers. The state’s largest union for public sector employees’ political motion committee donated $25,000 and Alaska’s nurses’ union donated $15,000.

President of the Alaska AFL-CIO Joelle Corridor, a member of Defend Our Structure’s govt committee, mentioned that opposition is as a result of the labor motion sees a conference as a risk to employees’ rights, notably to collective bargaining.

Shield Our Rights has raised simply over $76,000 with just about all of that cash coming from the Alaska Heart Training Fund, which has then gone again to the fund to pay for canvassing.

Conference YES says it has raised lower than $10,000 however it’s not required to publish a marketing campaign disclosure report till Oct. 10. Joshua Church, a Fairbanks monetary adviser, was listed till just lately as one among Conference YES’ three largest donors on ads. He mentioned that exhibits how small and grassroots the marketing campaign is.

“I feel I gave 600 bucks to make it on there,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

Tom Lucas, marketing campaign disclosure coordinator with the Alaska Public Places of work Fee, mentioned expenditures needs to be reported inside 10 days of them being made. Regardless of forming six weeks in the past, Conference YES has to this point filed none, Lucas mentioned.

The sure marketing campaign is being dwarfed by way of funding and supporters who’ve signed on, however Shuckerow can also be involved about particular pursuits. If a state constitutional conference is accredited, it will be the primary since Rhode Island held one in 1986. He mentioned it may flip Alaska into “a playground” for Exterior teams flooding in throughout debates, attempting to show the state’s foundational doc right into a check case for their very own coverage objectives.

Hughes mentioned the state’s founders deliberate for a constitutional conference query to seem on the poll as soon as in a decade with a particular course of, which permits for a easy majority of voters and a easy majority of delegates to alter the structure whereas bypassing the two-thirds majority threshold of the Legislature required to advance a constitutional modification. Possibly that was deliberate to unravel seemingly unsolvable issues, she mentioned.

Corridor mentioned it’s comprehensible why a conference, with its decrease bar for amending the structure, is an interesting possibility for conservatives. They’ve been annoyed after having their priorities constantly blocked within the state Capitol. Therefore, why they’re centered on ending gridlock.

“Gridlock is the time period you utilize if you don’t get your means,” she mentioned.

Advertisement

• • •





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Sullivan ‘side-deal’ not enough to save rural Alaska public broadcasting, opponents of Trump proposal to funding cut say

Published

on

Sullivan ‘side-deal’ not enough to save rural Alaska public broadcasting, opponents of Trump proposal to funding cut say


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Hours before the Senate is set to vote on President Donald Trump’s $9.4 billion proposal to cut funding for public broadcasting and foreign aid, opponents said Sen. Dan Sullivan’s negotiation with the Trump administration – which a spokesperson for Sullivan argued Tuesday night would preserve rural Alaska stations – would not be enough to save them, arguing it only amounted to a one-time check to Tribal public media stations.

“I think with a side deal like this, [with it] not in the underlying legislation, it is not going to be an amendment, so we are sort of relying on different sources both within Congress and the [Trump] administration to talk about what they’ve said they’ve agreed to,” Kate Riley, CEO and President of America’s Public Television Stations said.

But details of how the deal could potentially impact Alaska remain unclear.

Sullivan’s Tuesday night statement announcing the deal, from the senator’s spokesperson Amanda Coyne, did not clarify the framework of how the funding would be allocated.

Advertisement

“Because of the importance of public radio for rural Alaska, for years Senator Sullivan has been an advocate for funding for our rural stations, and has been working for the last number of weeks with his Senate colleagues and senior White House officials on alternative sources of funding to help keep rural radio stations on the air,” Coyne said. “Today, the administration committed to continued funding to help support our most rural stations.”

“As I understand it, there are no officially recognized ‘tribal’ stations in Alaska,” Alaska Public Media President and CEO Ed Ulman told Alaska’s News Source Wednesday. “Only Koahnic Broadcasting Corporation, which operates KNBA, is owned and operated by Alaska Natives.”

Leading up to Wednesday’s debate, last month KNBA President and CEO Jaclyn Sallee released a joint statement with 11 other Alaska public media stations explaining the potential impact.

“KNBA 90.3, could lose nearly 25% of its annual revenue, leading to cuts in service including local Alaska Native news and emergency alerts. Our award-winning national Native programs, Native America Calling and National Native News, part of daily schedules on stations across Alaska, would experience an even greater loss – one from which they might not be able to recover,“ she said. ”More than 60 tribal stations we serve would be disproportionately impacted where they offer efficient emergency alerts and vital community connections.”

The deal, according to Riley’s numbers, would potentially mean Alaska having to split $9.4 million among 28 Tribal stations in eight other states. She said those cuts would come out of reallocated programs from the Department of the Interior.

Advertisement

Senator Mike Rounds, R-South Dakota, who was also reportedly part of the negotiations with the White House, said on X yesterday that cuts from the Green New Deal would fund these Tribal stations.

“We wanted to make sure tribal broadcast services in South Dakota continued to operate which provide potentially lifesaving emergency alerts,” he said. “We worked with the Trump administration to find Green New Deal money that could be reallocated to continue grants to tribal radio stations without interruption.”

The funding, however, will not come in the way of additional legislation or an amendment to the president’s bill currently being discussed by the Senate. So far, Riley said, it only amounts to a Trump administration promise to provide support.

Though 28 Tribal stations would benefit from the promise, she added the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, where funds to local stations would be cut from, provides support to 36 Tribal stations. She did not know which 28 stations would be supported.

Riley said the “side deal” also left unanswered what happens to other rural community public media stations.

Advertisement

“Those are not the only stations that serve native populations and there are many of our local stations that are providing service in communities where there are no other local media sources and no other broadcasters,” she said. “We think it’s critically important that all of those local station services be protected.”

Following America’s Public Television Station’s statement Wednesday, Alaska’s News Source reached out to Sullivan’s office who declined an interview.

When Alaska’s News Source first informed Alaska Public Media’s Ulman about Sullivan’s negotiation Tuesday, Ulman said he was “blindsided.”

“I can tell you for a fact that multiple folks in the state of Alaska have explained to the senator and his office how [public media] works and how [the Corporation for Public Broadcasting] is essential to ensuring that the 27 public media outlets in Alaska can remain in operation,” Ulman said. “So, this isn’t even a compromise. It’s just not gonna work.”

Ulman said Alaska stands to lose more than $30 million in federal funding over the next two years, if the bill is passed.

Advertisement

″It’s a 20% cut to Alaska Public media’s operational budget. How do you run your household If you took a 20 Percent pay cut,” Ulman told Alaska’s News Source Wednesday. “Any type of cut that’s 50% or higher to an annual budget. You’re not the same organization and you can’t cut half of your operation and continue to really thrive.”

He added he’s concerned over how the promised funding to Alaska Native stations would be apportioned, and worried that hedging a bet on a promise from the Trump administration may be problematic.

“I want to see the details. If I were one of my colleagues, say in Petersburg, or in Talkeetna, (or in) Galena, I would want to know the deal. How is this really going to affect me?”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-AK, told reporters in the halls of Congress Wednesday that the public media funding bill was crucial to Alaska.

“There has been probably no issue, no single issue, that has drawn out more interest across the state of Alaksa than support for public broadcasting,” she said. “I come from a state that is extraordinarily rural. I come from a state where access to other forms of information and communication may be limited. It may just come by way of your radio. Call it old school, it’s what we live in many parts of the state.”

Advertisement

Murkowski was one of only three Republicans, including Sen. Susan Collins, R-ME, and Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY, who voted not to move forward with a vote, while Sullivan joined most other Republicans in voting to move forward on the bill.

“For years, in numerous meetings, Senator Sullivan has been consistently warning executives from public media entities, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and NPR that their biased programming and reporting, funded in part by the American taxpayer, would eventually jeopardize federal support for both national and local radio stations,” Coyne said.

As of publication, the Senate is voting on adding amendments to the legislation. If any amendments are approved by the legislature, the bill will be sent back to the House. The bill must pass Congress by Friday. Riley said she expected the vote to be close.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Attorney: $1B suit against Boeing, Alaska Airlines in door plug incident settled out of court

Published

on

Attorney: B suit against Boeing, Alaska Airlines in door plug incident settled out of court


PORTLAND Ore. (KPTV) – Three passengers who sued Boeing and Alaska Airlines for $1 billion over a door plug that flew out mid-air have settled the lawsuit with the companies out of court, according to one of the attorneys for the passengers.

Terms of the settlement were not disclosed, as part of the settlement agreement, according to the attorney.

Court documents show the suit was dismissed with prejudice on July 7, meaning the plaintiffs can not refile the same claim against the companies in the future.

PREVIOUS COVERAGE:

Advertisement
The NTSB officially faults Boeing for a door plug flying off in mid-air during an Alaska Airlines flight leaving Portland.

The lawsuit stemmed from an incident on January 5, 2024, when a door plug on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 from Portland to Ontario, Calif. flew out shortly after takeoff.

Last month, the National Transportation Safety Board found Boeing at fault for the incident following an investigation.

FOX 12 has reached out to Boeing and Alaska Airlines for comment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around, does it make a buck?

Published

on

If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around, does it make a buck?


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The Trump Administration’s announcement to rescind the National Forest’s ‘Roadless Rule’ in June has sparked outrage from some, and support from others. With the two largest National forests in the country, the announcement has caught the attention of Alaska businesses.

The rule, adopted in 2001, essentially prevents new roads from being built in a little over 58 million acres of National Forest, including the Tongass and Chugach National forests in Alaska. In an area that relies heavily on tourism, some fear its natural beauty could be compromised.

“Those magical places could become few and far between, and that’s a major problem,” said Hunter McIntosh, president of the Boat Company, a southeast Alaska non-profit that gives boat tours throughout the region.

Fewer roads means less timber harvest, and that reason, alongside wildfire prevention and others, was given by Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, who announced the USDA would be rescinding the Roadless Rule last month.

Advertisement

Greater access to the forests by roads has local environmental advocates and business owners like McIntosh concerned that logging and mining interests will be renewed.

“All these things potentially have a significant environmental impact on the fisheries and the wildlife, the hunting, subsistence and whatnot,” McIntosh said. “But then along with that also major impact on the largest economic driver of Southeast Alaska being tourism.”

Not only does McIntosh believe rescinding the rule will damage the environment, but he believes that the timber industry in Southeast Alaska is not economically feasible.

“The economics and what we do are really intertwined, in that — the timber industry is a heavily subsidized industry — and the tourism industry is not subsidized at all,” McIntosh said.

According to a report by the Southeast Conference, timber made up 4% of jobs and employment earnings in 2024.

Advertisement

For those who rely on timber for income, like Viking Lumber Mill in Klawock on Prince of Wales Island, they’d like to see growth in the industry. While the repeal of the roadless rule is a “step forward,” they say the forest service needs to better meet market demand.

“What the timber industry needs in order to survive is for the Forest Service to provide a continuous and ample supply,” said Sarah Dahlstrom, spokesperson for Viking Lumber.

“It is their obligation to do that. They are the largest landowner, and our industry relies on the largest landowner to supply our mill and all of the other micro mills, or mom-and-pop mills on our island.”

”State land is very limited and so we are relying on the Forest Service and the federal government to put timber sales out and it’s been a major struggle.”

Viking Lumber is Alaska’s largest mill, and nearly all of the finished lumber gets shipped to the Lower 48, or internationally.

Advertisement

Dahlstrom’s father, Kirk, bought the bankrupt mill in 1994, returning it to a profitable operation, but says they’re not quite out of the woods yet.

“For decades the Forest Service has failed to provide a sufficient timber supply to the entire industry,” Dahlstrom said.

Dahlstrom said that Viking is largely open because of a legislated land exchange between the Alaska Mental Health Trust and the U.S. Forest Service. For about a decade, the Forest Service has harvested off the land they received, but Dahlstrom said their sale agreement with them will be complete by August of this year.

In a local economy that Dahlstrom said benefits from roads built for timber harvest and wood by-products used to heat schools and public buildings, they hope to stay in business.

“We don’t want to take more than what we need,” Dahlstrom said.

Advertisement

“We want what we’ve been doing. It is a sustainable and renewable business.”

Meanwhile, McIntosh said the Boat Company generally avoids Prince of Wales Island on their tours because of the large swathes of clear-cut forest.

“People from the lower 48, guests and clients, they don’t want to see clear-cut,” McIntosh said. “They want to see wilderness. They want to see, you know, old growth trees. They want to be able to fish for salmon. They want to see bears and whales, and seeing huge swaths of sides of mountains completely clear-cut and then left is not something that that most tourists expect or want to see.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending