Connect with us

Austin, TX

Texas

Published

on

Texas


AUSTIN – A federal trial is set to begin Monday over claims that supporters of former President Donald Trump threatened and harassed a Biden-Harris campaign bus in Texas four years ago, disrupting the campaign on the last day of early voting.

Democrats on the bus said they feared for their lives as Trump supporters in dozens of trucks and cars nearly caused collisions, harassing their convoy for more than 90 minutes, hitting a Biden-Harris campaign staffer’s car and forcing the bus driver to repeatedly swerve for safety.

“For at least 90 minutes, defendants terrorized and menaced the driver and passengers,” the lawsuit alleges. “They played a madcap game of highway ‘chicken’ coming within three to four inches of the bus. They tried to run the bus off the road.”

The highway confrontation prompted an FBI investigation, which led then-President Trump to declare that in his opinion, “these patriots did nothing wrong.”

Advertisement

Among those suing is former Texas state senator from Fort Worth and Democratic nominee for governor Wendy Davis, who was on the bus that day. Davis rose to prominence in 2013 with her 13-hour filibuster of an anti-abortion bill in the state Capitol. The other three plaintiffs are a campaign volunteer, staffer and the bus driver.

Videos of the confrontation on Oct. 30, 2020, that were shared on social media, including some recorded by the Trump supporters, show a group of cars and pickup trucks — many adorned with large Trump flags — riding alongside the campaign bus as it traveled on I-35 from San Antonio to Austin. The Trump supporters at times boxed in the bus, slowed it down, kept it from exiting the highway and repeatedly forced the bus driver to make evasive maneuvers to avoid a collision, the lawsuit says.

On the two previous days, Biden-Harris supporters were subjected to death threats, with some Trump supporters displaying weapons, according to the lawsuit. These threats in combination with the highway confrontation led Democrats to cancel an event later in the day.

The lawsuit, which seeks unspecified monetary damages, accuses the six defendants of violating the “Ku Klux Klan Act,” an 1871 federal law to stop political violence and intimidation tactics. It alleges the defendants were members of local groups near San Antonio that coordinated the confrontation.

The same law was used in part to indict Trump on federal election interference charges over attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in the run-up to the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol insurrection. Enacted by Congress during the Reconstruction Era, the law was created to protect Black men’s right to vote by prohibiting political violence.

Advertisement

Francisco Canseco, an attorney for three of the defendants, said his clients acted lawfully and did not infringe on the free speech rights of those on the bus.

“It’s more of a constitutional issue,” Canseco said. “It’s more of who has the greater right to speak behind their candidate.”

Judge Robert Pitman, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, is set to preside over the trial. He denied the defendants’ pretrial motion for a summary judgment in their favor, ruling last month that the KKK Act prohibits the physical intimidation of people traveling to political rallies, even when racial bias isn’t a factor.

While one of the defendants, Eliazar Cisneros, argued his group had a First Amendment right to demonstrate support for their candidate, the judge wrote that “assaulting, intimidating, or imminently threatening others with force is not protected expression.”

“Just as the First Amendment does not protect a driver waving a political flag from running a red light, it does not protect Defendants from allegedly threatening Plaintiffs with reckless driving,” Pitman wrote.

Advertisement

A prior lawsuit filed over the “Trump Train” alleged the San Marcos Police Department violated the Ku Klux Klan Act by failing to send a police escort after multiple 911 calls were made and a bus rider said his life was threatened. It accused officers of privately laughing and joking about the emergency calls. San Marcos settled the lawsuit in 2023 for $175,000 and a requirement that law enforcement get training on responding to political violence.



Source link

Austin, TX

Luxury Austin Hilltop Estate with Panoramic Views Hits the Market – Austin Today

Published

on

Luxury Austin Hilltop Estate with Panoramic Views Hits the Market – Austin Today


This luxury Austin estate offers a private sanctuary for outdoor enthusiasts, with amenities ranging from nature trails to a hidden cave.Austin Today

A stunning 7.5-acre hilltop property in the Westlake neighborhood of Austin has hit the market, offering a rare blend of privacy, natural beauty, and proximity to the city’s vibrant urban core. The original Foster Ranch homestead at 2200 Cerca Viejo Way features a 3-bedroom, 2.5-bath main residence, an oversized 3-car garage with a guest room, and a spacious storage barn, all nestled among hundreds of mature oak trees and overlooking miles of the Barton Creek Greenbelt.

Why it matters

As Austin continues to grow rapidly, luxury properties that offer both seclusion and easy access to the city’s attractions are increasingly in demand. This unique listing provides a chance to own a piece of Austin’s history while enjoying the best of the city’s renowned outdoor lifestyle.

The details

The main residence blends rustic elegance with timeless craftsmanship, featuring limestone quarried near Barton Creek, authentic Saltillo tile flooring, and expansive picture windows framing breathtaking views. The property also includes nature trails, an agricultural-exempt bee farm, and a hidden cave, creating a private haven for exploration. The oversized garage and workshop are designed to support a potential second-story addition, transforming it into a guest house.

Advertisement
  • The property at 2200 Cerca Viejo Way in Austin, Texas was listed for sale on April 12, 2026.

What’s next

The property is currently listed for sale on PropGOLuxury.com for $5,500,000.

The takeaway

This rare Austin luxury listing offers a unique opportunity to own a piece of the city’s history while enjoying the benefits of a private, nature-filled oasis just minutes from the heart of downtown.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin Built Housing. Then Rents Fell. – Davis Vanguard

Published

on

Austin Built Housing. Then Rents Fell. – Davis Vanguard



Licensed under the Unsplash+ License

AUSTIN, Texas — As cities across the country struggle with rising rents and worsening affordability, Austin is emerging as one of the clearest real-world examples of what happens when local governments allow substantially more housing to be built: prices begin to ease.

After years of steep rent increases driven by rapid population growth, Austin’s median rent fell more than 16% between 2021 and 2026, according to a new analysis highlighted by Pew and reported by Smart Cities Dive. During roughly the same period, the city added housing at a pace that far outstripped most of the nation.

Between 2015 and 2024, Austin expanded its housing stock by 120,000 units — a 30% increase. By comparison, overall U.S. housing growth during that span was 9%, according to the report. Median rent in Austin is now 4% lower than the national average.

The data arrive at a time when housing debates in California and elsewhere often center on whether more supply can actually lower costs. In Austin, multiple independent reports suggest the answer is yes — though not without limits or remaining affordability challenges.

Advertisement

“Austin’s success serves as an important example of how regulatory barriers to building more housing are often varied and interconnected,” Pew’s report stated. “No single solution can solve a housing shortage, but Austin has taken multiple steps that have helped to unlock large amounts of housing supply in its market and reverse rent growth.”

Austin’s story did not begin with falling rents. It began with a boom.

The metro area’s population surged 33% from 2010 to 2020, creating intense demand for housing. During the prior decade, rents in Austin skyrocketed by nearly 93% from 2010 to 2019, according to the report. Then the COVID-19 era brought another wave of migration, strong job growth and additional upward pressure on prices.

But instead of freezing growth, Austin gradually changed its housing rules.

The city created a vertical mixed-use zoning category in 2007 that allowed more homes on sites while reducing minimum parking requirements by 60%. That policy alone led to more than 17,600 new units built or in progress as of 2024, according to Pew.

Advertisement

In 2015, Austin also made it easier to build accessory dwelling units, often known as ADUs, granny flats or backyard homes. The city reduced minimum lot size mandates and cut parking requirements. Between 2015 and 2024, Austin permitted nearly 3,000 ADUs, dramatically exceeding prior rates.

Then, in 2023, Austin became the largest U.S. city to eliminate parking requirements for nearly every type of property citywide, another move intended to reduce construction barriers and costs.

The city also paired deregulation with direct affordability strategies, including density bonuses and hundreds of millions of dollars in municipal bonds used to acquire land for new housing construction.

The combined result was a surge in new apartments and more competition among landlords.

Texas Tribune reported that builders in the Austin region obtained permits for 957 apartments per 100,000 residents between 2021 and 2023, outpacing other major metropolitan regions. That construction wave sent tens of thousands of units onto the market.

Advertisement

“When you introduce that many new apartments, your rental rates drop due to competition,” said Cindi Reed, director of MRI ApartmentData. “Supply and demand.”

That pressure has been visible across the market, not only in luxury buildings.

Pew found rents dropped 7% in apartment buildings with 50 or more units from 2023 to 2024 — the largest decline recorded in any large metro area. Rents in older, non-luxury buildings with lower-income renters fell about 11%.

Apartment List data cited by FOX 7 Austin similarly found Austin posted the fastest rent decline among comparably sized cities, with a 5.9% drop over the past year and a total decline of 20% from its 2022 peak.

The politics behind those changes also shifted.

Advertisement

Texas Tribune reported that Austin voters elected more pro-housing City Council members as costs worsened and frustration mounted. Councilmember José “Chito” Vela said the city’s older assumptions about limiting construction had failed.

“We were working under the premise for a couple of decades here in Austin that if we did not allow new construction, that would help preserve neighborhoods and hold down costs,” Vela said. “That has just been objectively shown to be false, and that the contrary approach is true.”

That statement captures a central divide in housing politics nationally. Many communities have long believed restricting new development protects affordability or neighborhood character. Austin’s recent experience suggests those restrictions can instead intensify scarcity and push rents upward.

Still, Austin is not a utopia, and falling rents do not mean housing is suddenly affordable for everyone.

The typical asking rent in Austin was $1,645 as of December, according to Zillow data cited by Texas Tribune. That is below recent peaks but still above pre-pandemic levels. Overall rents remain about 17% higher than before the pandemic.

Advertisement

Nearly half of renters in the Austin-Round Rock region remain cost-burdened, meaning they spend more than 30% of income on rent and utilities. Nearly a quarter spend at least half their income on housing and utilities, placing them in the severely cost-burdened category.

“Affordability has a technical definition, and it’s paying 30% or less of your income toward rent,” said Ben Martin, research director for Texas Housers. “And for many people in Austin, that was not the case before the pandemic, and it’s not the case now.”

Homeownership also remains difficult. According to the report, home prices in Austin have hovered above $500,000, and a household may need to earn more than $140,000 to afford a median-priced home in the region.

Falling rents do not erase deeper affordability problems. Austin shows that adding housing can ease price pressure, but it does not eliminate the need for subsidized affordable homes, stronger wages, tenant protections and other public policy tools.

Still, the city’s experience challenges a common assumption in housing politics: shortages do not improve when little gets built. Austin pursued multiple reforms at once, including zoning changes, parking reductions, ADU legalization, public financing for affordable housing and large-scale construction.

Advertisement

The result of those policies was that, after a major increase in housing supply, rents moved down.

Follow the Vanguard on Social Media – X, Instagram and Facebook.  Subscribe the Vanguard News letters.  To make a tax-deductible donation, please visit davisvanguard.org/donate or give directly through ActBlue.  Your support will ensure that the vital work of the Vanguard continues.

Categories:

Breaking News Housing

Tags:

Affordability Crisis Austin housing housing policy Housing Supply rent decline zoning reform





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Two IT Employees Allegedly Working for Dallas and Austin Simultaneously

Published

on

Two IT Employees Allegedly Working for Dallas and Austin Simultaneously


Authorities are investigating a tip that two IT employees worked full-time for the cities of Dallas and Austin at the same time, earning a combined $270,000 from Dallas alone. While Dallas continues its investigation, Austin recently terminated three technology staff members. Both cities report that systems remain secure with no data breaches.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending