Connect with us

Northeast

Trump assassination attempt: Suspicious persons common, but police testimony raises new questions

Published

on

Trump assassination attempt: Suspicious persons common, but police testimony raises new questions

After Pennsylvania police leaders revealed there were at least two other suspicious individuals besides would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks spotted at the July 13 Trump rally, experts tell Fox News Digital that reports of “suspicious” or “unusual” people at Secret Service events are common.

Pennsylvania’s State Police commissioner, Col. Christopher Paris, testified before the House Homeland Security Committee this week that at least two other suspicious individuals were identified at the rally before Crooks launched his attempt on the life of former President Trump. 

Actual “threats” are rare, and the gunman is believed to have acted alone. But the state police commissioner’s testimony raised new questions about different aspects of the attempted assassination of Trump.

TRUMP SHOOTER WAS NOT ONLY SUSPICIOUS PERSON AT BUTLER RALLY: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE COMMISSIONER

Kevin Rojek, special agent in charge of the FBI Pittsburgh field office, left, speaks as Pennsylvania State Police Col. Christopher Paris looks on during a press conference at a police station in Butler, Pennsylvania, after former President Trump was injured when shots were fired during a campaign rally on July 13. (Reuters/Brendan McDermid)

Advertisement

Paris told lawmakers that before the deadly rally, he asked the Secret Service about a building where Crooks would later climb up and open fire. 

“We were told that Butler [Emergency Services Unit] ESU was responsible for that area, by several Secret Service agents on that walk-through,” he said. County leaders have disputed that statement.

Legislators spent days grilling law enforcement leaders on the rally’s security failures and several have visited the scene, about an hour’s drive north of Pittsburgh, in person. Within days of testifying Monday, U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle resigned.

WATCH: Butler Township commissioner says Trump rally police were ‘strictly for traffic control’

Paris testified in front of the House Homeland Security Committee this week that at least two other people had been deemed suspicious in addition to Crooks. The would-be assassin became “even more suspicious” after authorities saw him with a range finder, he said.

Advertisement

“The [counter-sniper] teams were not focused in that area because they believed that the building’s rooftop/roof access was covered. It wasn’t till he started firing that they then turn their attention over there.”

— Bill Gage, retired Secret Service agent

He was also wearing a backpack and moving around outside the perimeter, prompting police to keep an eye on him. Officers approached but he ran off.

“There was a text thread that was going — they took a photo of him at some point when he utilized the range finder,” he told lawmakers. “The suspicion was heightened… I know from an interview that was immediately relayed in the command post to the Secret Service.”

TRUMP SHOOTING: TIMELINE OF ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

Thomas Matthew Crooks is alleged to be the shooter in the assassination attempt on former President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. (Obtained by Fox News Digital)

Advertisement

A person can be flagged as suspicious or unusual for a number of reasons, and the Secret Service has investigators in the field to rapidly assess such an individual, experts say.

“‘Suspicious person’? Not uncommon. Very low bar. ‘Genuine threat’? Much rarer, and Crooks progressed to the latter,” said Paul Mauro, a retired NYPD inspector. 

Crooks was initially seen without a weapon, so authorities deemed him suspicious at that time, but not a full-blown threat, Paris testified.

“They were out looking for him when he began shooting. They were just a few seconds too late.”

— Bill Gage, retired Secret Service agent

“Every single event I worked, which is thousands, there were suspicious people and events that have to be investigated,” said Bill Gage, a retired Secret Service agent and a consultant at Safehaven Security Group.

Advertisement

Authorities approach the suspected gunman where he fell after the U.S. Secret Service returned fire after an apparent assassination attempt on former President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. (Obtained by Fox News Digital)

WHISTLEBLOWER REVEALS WHY TRUMP RALLY OFFICER ASSIGNED TO SHOOTER’S PERCH MOVED

Police and the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) also may have differing definitions of what exactly constitutes a suspicious person, he said.

“Why did the director of PSP [Pennsylvania State Police] label them as suspicious? Did they approach an officer and ask for Trump’s autograph? A local might think that’s suspicious, but to USSS it’s kinda normal,” he said. “Or was someone sort of the proverbial long trench coat on a hot day?” 

Gage said that while Paris was forthcoming in his testimony, the answers he gave raise entirely new questions.

Advertisement

“Crooks ‘ran off’ from the officer when confronted? That’s very odd behavior at an event,” he said. “Running from the police and you have a backpack? Was that info relayed to the command post? What was the command post told?”

A law enforcement officer reacts during former President Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Gage also wanted to know more about the “text thread” that law enforcement officers were said to be using to communicate regarding Crooks’ initial sighting and disappearance.

OFFICER REPORTED MAN AT TRUMP RALLY WITH RANGE-FINDER 30 MINS BEFORE ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT: SOURCE

“And that Crooks was on the roof for three minutes? Three minutes is an eternity for a sniper,” he said. “The CS teams were not focused in that area because they believed that the building’s rooftop/roof access was covered. It wasn’t till he started firing that they then turn their attention over there.”

Advertisement

Former President Trump is surrounded by U.S. Secret Service agents at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

For Mauro, the burning question is about where county personnel were stationed as the Secret Service and local partners tried to track Crooks down once action was deemed necessary.

“Did anyone remain in that second floor observation post or not?” he pondered, referring to a vantage point near where Crooks opened fire.

Releasing the operational plan to congressional investigators would help clear up lingering confusion about who was placed where, and why the security breach was allowed to happen, he added.

During her own testimony this week, Cheatle confirmed Crooks had been spotted outside the secure perimeter prior to the shooting and said authorities had been alerted to reports of a suspicious person “somewhere between two and five times.” At another point in her testimony, she said she believed Crooks acted alone.

Advertisement

FBI Director Christopher Wray testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 5, 2023. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Crooks was elevated from a suspicious person to an actual threat “seconds before the gunfire started,” she added. Cheatle later stepped down after bipartisan calls for her resignation.

FBI Director Christopher Wray also testified on Capitol Hill, revealing some of the information investigators have been able to glean off of Crooks’ phone and laptop.

Crooks was researching prior presidential assassinations — including by searching Google for the phrase, “how far away was Oswald from Kennedy?” — on the same day he registered to attend the rally.

“Starting somewhere around July 6 or so, he became very focused on former President Trump and this rally,” he said. 

Advertisement

In a statement, the FBI later said the investigation into Crooks was a top priority.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Since the day of the attack, the FBI has been consistent and clear that the shooting was an attempted assassination of former President Trump which resulted in his injury, as well as the death of a heroic father and the injuries of several other victims,” a spokesperson said. “This was a heinous attack and the FBI is devoting enormous resources to learn everything possible about the shooter and what led to his act of violence. The FBI’s Shooting Reconstruction Team continues to examine evidence from the scene, including bullet fragments, and the investigation remains ongoing.”

While the 20-year-old failed to kill the GOP presidential candidate, he did kill a bystander named Corey Comperatore, 50, and wound at least two others in the audience, David Dutch, 57, and James Copenhaver, 74. Trump, who ducked for cover and was later pictured with blood on the right side of his head, said he had been struck in the ear.

Trump told Fox News’ “Jesse Watters Primetime” this week that the Secret Service allowed him to walk out on stage without warning him there was anyone suspicious lurking on the outskirts of the rally.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Christina Coulter and Sarah Rumpf-Whitten contributed to this report.

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

Man Sentenced to 115 Years for Killing N.Y.P.D. Officer in Queens

Published

on

Man Sentenced to 115 Years for Killing N.Y.P.D. Officer in Queens

A man was sentenced to 115 years in prison on Monday for the fatal shooting of a New York City police officer who had ordered him to step out of a car in Queens in 2024.

More than 200 people, mostly police officers, packed a courtroom in State Supreme Court in Queens to hear Justice Michael Aloise sentence Guy Rivera in the killing of Jonathan Diller, 31, who was promoted to the rank of detective after his death.

“It took me five minutes to calculate these numbers,” Justice Aloise said. “It’s going to take you a lifetime to calculate the damage you did and the grief that you caused.”

He said that Mr. Rivera had determined his own fate “the second you pulled that trigger.”

Detective Diller’s wife, Stephanie, who sat among the officers in the courtroom, read a statement in court just before the sentencing, speaking of the pain and loss that she and her son, Ryan, now 3, have suffered. Ms. Diller, who testified during the trial, spoke directly to Mr. Rivera as he sat at the defense table.

Advertisement

“This is the last moment I will allow you to take from me,” she said as tears rolled down her cheeks. “You took my husband, Jonathan. You took the future we planned together. The life we were building, the years we were supposed to share together.”

“What you did to Jonathan” she said, “gave me and our son a life sentence without him.”

A jury found Mr. Rivera, 36, guilty earlier this month on four charges, including aggravated manslaughter, in Detective Diller’s death, but acquitted him of the most serious charge, first-degree murder. The decision, after a three-week trial in Queens, stunned the dozens of police officers present when it was announced in the courtroom on April 1.

To find him guilty of murder, the jury had to decide whether they believed Mr. Rivera had intended to kill Detective Diller when he pointed his gun at him in the Far Rockaway section of Queens on March 25, 2024. They ultimately determined that Mr. Rivera had intentionally pulled the trigger, but did not intend to kill him.

Mr. Rivera did not speak at his sentencing at the advice of one of his lawyers, Jamal Johnson, who told Justice Aloise they would appeal the conviction.

Advertisement

Mr. Johnson, a lawyer with the Legal Aid Society, said after the hearing that Justice Aloise’s statement at sentencing showed the court “had already made up its mind about sentencing well before the trial was conducted.”

During the trial, prosecutors said that before the fatal shooting, Detective Diller’s partner, Sgt. Sasha Rosen, saw Mr. Rivera and another man, Lindy Jones, come out of a store and get into a car. Mr. Rivera had an L-shaped object in the pocket of his sweatshirt that resembled a firearm, prosecutors said.

Detective Diller approached the vehicle and asked Mr. Rivera repeatedly to comply with orders. When he did not, Sergeant Rosen reached in to pull him out of the car.

Then Mr. Rivera fired, the jury found. The defense argued that Mr. Rivera’s gun went off accidentally when Sergeant Rosen pulled him out, striking Detective Diller. Prosecutors said Mr. Rivera then turned his gun on Sergeant Rosen, but the weapon jammed.

Justice Aloise did not allow the jury to see video that, the defense contended, showed Mr. Rivera’s arm was broken during his confrontation with the police.

Advertisement

That evidence would have directly undermined the prosecution’s contention that Mr. Rivera was physically able to pull the trigger when he tried to shoot Sergeant Rosen, they said.

In all, Mr. Rivera was sentenced to 25 years to life for the aggravated manslaughter conviction; 40 years to life for the attempted murder of Sergeant Rosen; and 25 years to life for each of the gun possession counts. He was ordered to serve those sentences consecutively.

.

On Monday, after the sentencing, dozens of police officers smiled and embraced one another as they left the courtroom. The prosecutors who tried the case and Melinda Katz, the Queens district attorney, hugged several of Detective Diller’s family members.

Jessica Tisch, the police commissioner, called the sentence “obviously the right result, for him and for anyone who kills a New York City police officer.”

Advertisement

Outside the courthouse, members of the Police Benevolent Association, the police officers’ union, said they were pleased with the sentence.

“The verdict in this case did not send the right message to the Diller family and every police officer who wears the uniform,” said Patrick Hendry, the union president, who spoke at the foot of the courthouse stairwell, backed by nearly 100 police officers.

“But this sentence,” he said, “it sent the right message.”

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Disney’s “Beauty and the Beast” musical returns to Boston for first time in 25 years

Published

on

Disney’s “Beauty and the Beast” musical returns to Boston for first time in 25 years


Say bonjour to the return of “Beauty and the Beast.” The national tour has been in Boston before, but this is the first time in 25 years that Disney is behind the production.

Kyra Belle Johnson stars as Belle, the bookworm who doesn’t quite fit into her quiet village.

“I think part of treating her like a real person is finding the humor and finding the faults and breathing and being present on stage every night,” Johnson said. 

As Mrs. Potts, Kathy Voytko embodies the beloved teapot.

Advertisement

“When I was talking to my daughters about, ‘How do you feel about mom being gone for the better part of a year?’ They said, ‘Well, geez, mom, we’re gonna miss you, but it’s Mrs. Potts,’” Voytko explained. 

The actors told WBZ-TV that Disney’s involvement in this tour makes a noticeable impact, with Voytko saying, “There is nothing like a Disney-produced Disney production because the magic in the show, the attention to detail, the loving recreation of the movie that we all know and love, plus some elements of surprise.”

Johnson added, “They care about this piece of art so much… And they’re really precious with it, but at the same time, they’re open with it.”

 Book writer Linda Woolverton worked with the cast in the rehearsal room to make sure the piece felt modern.

“She literally changed some scenes and lines specifically for us and our versions of these characters to make it seem grounded and real,” Johnson explained.

Advertisement

And Johnson gained extra insight into Belle’s life by visiting the Alsace region of France, which inspired the original Disney animators.

“Walking in the town and having like a storefront and then the leaning building that was this like blue and the wooden windows and somebody leaning out of it talking to somebody on the street. These are real places, it’s not just like a made-up place in your head.”

The wonder she felt is echoed in the audience’s response.

“This is a gate for a lot of new theater lovers. We get a lot of people who this is their first show,” said Johnson.

“It’s for everybody,” added Voytko. “It’s for adults, it’s for married couples, it is for a date night, it for a pack of pals who just want to see something nostalgic from their youth and it makes it a thrill for us every single day.”

Advertisement

You can see Disney’s “Beauty and the Beast” at the Citizens Opera House in Boston through Sunday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pittsburg, PA

NFL Draft in Pittsburgh sets onsite attendance record, third-best viewership mark

Published

on

NFL Draft in Pittsburgh sets onsite attendance record, third-best viewership mark


A historic number of people flooded into Pittsburgh for the NFL Draft on Thursday.

Around 320,000 fans attended the opening round of the draft on Thursday night just outside of Acrisure Stadium in Pittsburgh, which marked an attendance record for round one of the draft, ESPN announced on Monday afternoon. In total, about 805,000 people attended the three-day event.

Advertisement

ESPN also said that about 13,2 million people tuned in to watch the first round of the NFL Draft on Thursday night, which made it the third-most watched opening round under the current format, which started back in 2010. Only the 2025 and 2020 editions of the draft drew a bigger audience on the first night.

Advertisement

The league said that a record amount of merchandise was sold throughout the NFL Draft weekend, too, though it did not provide a figure or metric there. The previous record on that front was set last season in Green Bay.

The Las Vegas Raiders used the No. 1 overall pick on Indiana quarterback and reigning Heisman Trophy winner Fernando Mendoza on Thursday night. Mendoza, who led the Hoosiers to the national championship earlier this year, was not in attendance in Pittsburgh. Instead, he celebrated with his family from home in Miami.

Advertisement

The NFL Draft will be held next spring in Washington D.C. for the first time in modern history. It’s expected to be held on the National Mall. Washington D.C. held the draft one other time back in December 1940.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending