Connect with us

Northeast

Democrats in this blue state double down on protecting criminal migrants. For one silly reason

Published

on

Democrats in this blue state double down on protecting criminal migrants. For one silly reason

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

During the last four years, Massachusetts has been overwhelmed by the migrant surge coming across the southern border. Last year, Gov. Maura Healey declared a state of emergency, citing the rapid increase in migrant families seeking shelter and the state’s inability to adequately accommodate them.

Advertisement

Before the November 5th election, Healey was sending top deputies to the southern border to deliver a message that Massachusetts had no more vacancies. Healey, along with eight other Democratic governors, pleaded for federal action, including asking for funding to support states that had spent billions of dollars on housing and feeding the migrants. 

Massachusetts was hit so hard democratic lawmakers condemned Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey for opposing bipartisan immigration reform. Two years of unrelenting waves of migrants continue to cost Massachusetts taxpayers between $1 and $2 billion annually – with no end in sight. Gov. Healey, herself, took aim at the Biden/Harris administration, stating: “This is not a problem that Massachusetts created.”

BLUE STATE FACES SPIKE IN MIGRANT SEX CRIMES AS TOP CITY PLEDGES RESISTANCE TO TRUMP DEPORTATIONS

Yet when relief is being offered, Massachusetts Democrats are not only rejecting that relief, but they’re also pledging to fight it to protect illegal migrants, even ones accused of abhorrent crimes, at the expense of taxpayers and public safety.

Why? Because it involves President Trump. Democrats fighting Trump, when it comes to reasonable common-sense deportations, will prove short-sighted, even in blue Massachusetts. Without question, Trump’s position on illegal immigration played a major role in why Trump improved his standing with voters in practically every city and town across Massachusetts. 

Advertisement

Ignoring those results, after President Trump won, Healey restated her order that the State Police stand down if ICE asks for cooperation in apprehending violent migrants. According to Healey, she intends to use “every tool in the toolbox” to “protect” migrants from any deportation efforts made by the Trump administration.

Additionally, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu vowed to defy federal mass deportation efforts. And just last week, the Boston City Council voted unanimously to reaffirm its status as a sanctuary city. Ironically, the following day, the DOJ charged twenty-five people in a fentanyl trafficking conspiracy in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Nineteen targets were arrested in an ICE/DEA operation. Fourteen of the nineteen migrants are illegal. Ten of those illegal migrants were arrested in Boston the day after the 13-0 vote, affirming Boston’s sanctuary status. You literally, can’t make this stuff up.

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu vowed to defy federal mass deportation efforts. (AP Photo/Mary Schwalm, File)

In November 2024, ICE arrested three individuals in Massachusetts on multiple charges related to child rape. Authorities also arrested a Brazilian national who allegedly raped a young woman behind a bar in Plymouth. Earlier this year, another migrant was arrested at the Chelmsford shelter on charges of raping a 12-year-old girl and just last year, ICE officials on Cape Cod located and arrested a Venezuelan national on the run from murder charges. When a disabled 15-year-old girl was raped by an illegal migrant, Gov. Healey disgracefully declared, “Things will happen.” In Massachusetts, it’s happening way too much.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Advertisement

Last week, Jon Fetherston, a former director at a migrant shelter, explained that in Massachusetts, undocumented migrants, including those accused of child rape, receive food stamps and government health insurance. The migrants are all given three meals a day from catering companies and provided essential items such as toiletries, diapers, strollers and baby wipes. Migrants also received state-paid, same-day dry cleaning and taxpayer-funded Uber rides to appointments when needed. 

He also exposed incidents of widespread violence, child sexual assault, and rape at shelters throughout the state, including an incident where a father impregnated his own 14-year-old daughter. Instead of alerting ICE and detaining him in a Middlesex County jail, authorities shipped this heinous individual to neighboring Worcester County, where he was placed in another taxpayer-funded shelter. Fetherston stated that a 16-year-old female student was also raped multiple times inside the shelter by a 29-year-old illegal migrant.

Gov. Healey has a crisis on her hands. More than 300 “serious incidents” have been recorded at state-run migrant facilities this year, but officials refuse to provide further details about why police or firefighters responded and what crimes may have occurred. Calls for police and emergency services to hotels and shelters housing migrants have skyrocketed. 

And yet the elected leaders of Massachusetts are vowing to protect such violent criminals from being lawfully deported. By opposing Trump at every turn and burying their heads in the sand, Massachusetts Democrats like Healy, Warren and Wu have virtually guaranteed we will be left alone to clean up – and pay for – a mess created by them and their fellow Democrats. If those actions lead to attempts to disperse migrants and offer monthly stipends to hide them from ICE, Gov. Healey and her co-conspirators could be guilty of violating Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) of federal law (harboring or concealing an illegal alien). 

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey pauses to look at the Army cots set up on the gym floor as State and local officials toured the Melnea A. Cass Recreational Complex. (Getty Images)

Advertisement

Massachusetts was among one of the Democratic-leaning states that shifted to the right this year; in Bristol County, a hub of working-class immigrants for decades, Trump nearly defeated Harris and outright won the city of Fall River, the first time a Republican has done so in roughly 100 years. 

The impact of illegal immigration in Massachusetts has no party affiliation and even traditional blue state voters realize something must change. Gov. Healey’s approval rating has slipped below 50%, indicating that virtue-signaling alone won’t guarantee her a second term in 2026.

If Massachusetts Democrats continue to sacrifice public safety, taxpayers’ dollars and commonsense for their political party’s agenda, they may see voters elect Republicans to do the job instead. 

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Sen. Collins tours Mid-Maine Technical Center

Published

on

Sen. Collins tours Mid-Maine Technical Center


WATERVILLE, Maine (WABI) – Sen. Susan Collins, R-ME, traveled to Waterville Monday to tour the Mid-Maine Technical Center.

At MMTC, high school students from four districts get hands-on experience in job-focused classrooms across 15 different programs.

Collins toured several of those programs, including nursing, media, and culinary arts.

She highlighted the more than seven hundred thousand dollars she secured in federal funding in 2024 for machine tooling and 3D printing equipment.

Advertisement

Also adding the importance of schools like this to not only fill critical workforce gaps, but do so right here in the state.

“Programs like this help encourage students to stay in the state of Maine once they’ve finished their education,” answered Collins. “It gives them a real boost if they’re going on to higher education, but it also equips them with the skills that they need if they’re going directly into the workforce.”

Collins also mentioned cooperative agreements in some programs that allow students to start earning college credit. Many students she spoke with also spend part of the week working for local businesses in their field.

Copyright 2026 WABI. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Will Minogue’s Trump ties, abortion stance make him unelectable in Mass.? – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Will Minogue’s Trump ties, abortion stance make him unelectable in Mass.? – The Boston Globe


Mike Minogue spoke to the media briefly at the Massachusetts GOP Convention in Worcester on April, 25 2026.Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff

Minogue’s words during a recent appearance on WCVB’s “On The Record” — “I’m a Catholic and I am pro-life” — certainly run counter to the careful abortion rights positioning of other Massachusetts Republicans who won the governor’s office over the past three-plus decades.

When Charlie Baker ran for governor in 2014, his first general election campaign ad featured his then-17-year-old daughter saying, “You’re totally pro-choice and bipartisan.” When Mitt Romney ran for governor in 2002, he stated in a debate, “I will preserve and protect a women’s right to choose.” When Bill Weld ran for governor in 1990, he told the Globe, “Count me as ‘modified pro-choice.’”

Advertisement

Over time, these positions evolved in different ways.

Weld went from “modified pro-choice” to showing up at a national GOP convention to lobby against the party’s antiabortion platform. When Romney ran for president, he retreated completely from the stance he’d taken in Massachusetts. Despite Baker’s “totally pro-choice” positioning, he ultimately vetoed a bill that expanded access to abortion, including a provision that would have allowed 16- and 17-year-olds to get an abortion without parental consent. The Legislature overturned that veto, and the measure became law in 2020.

As reported by WBUR, the Minogue campaign put out a statement that said, “Mike Minogue cannot and will not change the law,” without elaborating beyond that.

In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned abortion as a national right, making state law even more critical. Since then, Governor Maura Healey has made the strengthening of abortion protections for patients and providers even more of a signature cause.

Last week’s ruling by a federal appeals court in New Orleans, which halted access to a common abortion drug, mifepristone, through the mail for telehealth patients, once again underscored the political uncertainty around abortion access. Healey, who joined other Democrat-led states in stockpiling the drug to guard against a potential ban of it, quickly issued a statement that said she would “keep standing up to efforts by President Trump and his allies to roll back reproductive rights.”

Advertisement

On Monday, the Supreme Court temporarily restored access to mifepristone. Both sides have a week to respond.

While Minogue can try to argue that abortion is protected in Massachusetts, and there’s nothing he can or would do to change that, these are unpredictable times for reproductive rights. It’s a key issue that puts him at odds with many Massachusetts voters.

His first campaign ad since the GOP convention that endorsed him introduces him as “a new kind of governor.”

By Massachusetts standards, he certainly would be different. He’s much closer to Trump than other recent Republican candidates, having hosted that Vance fund-raiser and donated nearly $1 million to Trump and MAGA candidates in 2024.

Of Massachusetts’ 5 million voters, 1.2 million are registered Democrats, and 423,387 are registered Republicans. Unenrolled or independent voters, who make up 3.2 million registered voters, are key to winning statewide office. Given that Trump’s overall approval rating in the state is about 33 percent, Minogue’s Trump connections are not going to help him much with that crowd.

Advertisement

Polling also shows that the vast majority of Massachusetts voters strongly support abortion rights and are more likely to support elected officials if they work to advance legislation that will prevent the government from interfering with personal decisions about pregnancy.

Minogue will no doubt want to talk about transgender athletes, illegal immigration, the cost of housing and utilities, and the overall issue of economic growth. His allies are also trying to drive Shortsleeve out of the race, and in the WCVB interview, Minogue argued that the overwhelming endorsement he got from the roughly 1,800 delegates who attended the convention shows where the Republican Party is in Massachusetts right now.

And so it does. But is that where most Massachusetts voters are?

There’s a legitimate debate to be had, for sure, about the economic direction of the state.

But to have it, Minogue will have to convince voters to look past his Trump association and his “pro-life” self-description. Meanwhile, a fellow Republican is calling him unelectable — music to Healey’s ears.

Advertisement

Joan Vennochi is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at joan.vennochi@globe.com. Follow her @joan_vennochi.





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

NH medical marijuana program added 2,100 new patients last year – Monadnock Ledger-Transcript

Published

on

NH medical marijuana program added 2,100 new patients last year – Monadnock Ledger-Transcript


More than 2,100 new patients signed up with New Hampshire’s Therapeutic Cannabis Program last year, bringing the total registry to nearly 17,000, according to new state data.

That increase — about 14.5% from the year prior — is the largest since 2021.

Likely driving the growth were changes to state law in 2024 that allowed more people to qualify for medical marijuana use. They can now join the program at doctors’ discretion — which covers any debilitating or terminal condition or symptom, as long as their medical provider agrees the benefits of cannabis could outweigh the risks — or with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder.

Advertisement

More than 900 patients list anxiety as their qualifying condition, according to the report issued this week by the state Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the program.

“There was certainly an uptick in growth after those bills took effect in late 2024. It hasn’t skyrocketed, but has somewhat accelerated the growth of the program,” said Matt Simon, a lobbyist for GraniteLeaf Cannabis, one of three licensed cannabis providers in the state. “Where we’ve been, this extremely tiny program that was tiny for years, it is steadily growing.”

With 16,846 people, about 1.2% of the population are either certified patients or designated caregivers, who are authorized to buy cannabis on behalf of a patient. That’s close to one in every 84 Granite Staters.

The data released by the state was collected in June 2025. Simon estimates roughly 1,000 more people have joined since then.

The Therapeutic Cannabis Program, established in 2013, is the only way to lawfully consume marijuana in New Hampshire, as recreational use remains illegal. Patients require a doctor’s approval to join and receive a state-issued card that licenses them to buy medical cannabis products from seven dispensaries across the state, operated by three producers: GraniteLeaf Cannabis, Sanctuary Medicinals and Temescal Wellness.

Advertisement

The new data comes as the Trump administration reclassified medical marijuana last month as a less dangerous drug, effectively legitimizing programs run in 40 states, including New Hampshire’s. The change opens the door for more cannabis research and potential tax breaks for producers.

NH Therapeutic Cannabis Program patients by municipality
NH Therapeutic Cannabis Program patients by municipality Credit: NH Department of Health and Human Services

In New Hampshire, program demographics skew older. Nearly a quarter of patients are between 55 and 65 years old, and almost 70% of patients are over the age of 45. Pain is far and away the most common condition that people aim to treat with cannabis.

Patients are concentrated in southern New Hampshire and in towns where dispensaries, also called alternative treatment centers, are located. There are seven across the state in Chichester, Conway, Dover, Keene, Lebanon, Merrimack and Plymouth.

Concord has between 300 and 734 patients, according to the state data. Manchester has the most patients out of any municipality, at 1,150.

Despite the program’s growth, cost and accessibility remain a challenge. Jerry Knirk, a retired surgeon and state representative who now chairs the state’s Therapeutic Cannabis Medical Oversight Board, said New Hampshire’s strict regulatory environment plays a role.

“Part of the issue is we have a very high-quality, highly regulated program with testing of all products and lots of restrictions and things, and that does make things more expensive, but it’s how you keep the quality to be really high,” Knirk said. “We want to have really good quality. Unfortunately, it does make it a little bit harder.

Advertisement

One family of three spent $548 after discounts on a six-week supply of their medicine, which they use for chronic pain and other ailments, the Monitor reported last year.

Limited retail locations also mean that in some parts of the North Country, patients must drive upwards of an hour to obtain their medicine.

“The lack of dispensary locations, well, yeah, that is a problem,” Knirk said.

The oversight board, joined by other advocates, has pushed for laws to alleviate those concerns. Some of the biggest include allowing patients to grow their own medicine at home and letting dispensaries use outdoor greenhouses to cut down on electricity costs.

That legislation is introduced in the State House almost every year but is often torpedoed by Republicans’ concerns over security protocols.

Advertisement

While advocates expected little movement on marijuana policy under Gov. Kelly Ayotte, who opposes legalizing recreational use, the bill to allow greenhouse cultivation is nearing the finish line this session. Former governor Chris Sununu vetoed a similar bill two years ago; Ayotte hasn’t indicated whether she’d sign it.

Simon said that while cost and accessibility are still challenges, patient satisfaction with the program is improving.

“We started in a tough place with a lot of people really not liking the law and the program,” he said. “I think it’s been steady growth and steady improvement. Prices have come down somewhat, and the vibes are better.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending