Connect with us

Boston, MA

Boston, pro soccer team sued over White Stadium redevelopment

Published

on

Boston, pro soccer team sued over White Stadium redevelopment


Neighbors and park advocates have filed a lawsuit against the city and a professional women’s soccer team planning to restore and use Franklin Park’s White Stadium, stating that such a use would unconstitutionally privatize the land.

Mayor Michelle Wu pushed back on that claim, however, stating that any attempts to paint the redevelopment project as a privatization of White Stadium was “either a misunderstanding or a misrepresentation.”

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Suffolk Superior Court, the plaintiffs also allege that redevelopment plans would largely displace Boston Public School student-athletes and community members who regularly use the park and stadium, and were made hastily by the city and Boston Unity Soccer Partners without public input.

“We have heard from many members of the community who are deeply concerned about the proposal by Boston Unity Soccer Partners to redevelop and privatize White Stadium and 1.5 acres of surrounding public parkland in order to support the unique needs of a profit-driven professional sports team,” Karen Mauney-Brodek, president of the Emerald Necklace Conservancy, said on a Wednesday press call.

Advertisement

Mauney-Brodek said the Emerald Necklace Conservancy, a nonprofit park advocacy group joined by 15 city residents in filing the lawsuit, “shares their concerns over the unconstitutional privatization of public land.”

“We support the renovation of White Stadium and Franklin Park, but we do not support the required involvement of a professional sports team that would displace the local community for the next 30 years while privatizing and profiting from this public resource,” she said. “This major redevelopment is being fast-tracked without adequate community input or proper environmental review.”

In filing the lawsuit, Mauney-Brodek said, the plaintiffs are “asking the city to slow down and respect the public process.”

The 22-page court filing lays out a number of grievances with the plan, which, according to the plaintiffs, calls for White Stadium to be reserved exclusively for use by the new professional women’s soccer team for 20 weekend days from April to November, roughly 77% of Saturdays during the warmer months.

The lawsuit also states that the pitch will be reserved as pro soccer practice sessions for 20 Friday evenings, and that Boston Public School football games traditionally held at the stadium will be displaced.

Advertisement

It also alleges several legal violations on the city and state level.

The project, according to the lawsuit, would “illegally transfer the public trust lands” held by the beneficiaries of the White Fund Trust “to private parties, ensuring extensive, exclusive use” of those lands by a private party for the operation of a professional sports team.

The city has “failed to consider any alternatives to the project,” the lawsuit states, “all while rapidly ignoring the terms of the White Fund Trust and the requirements of Article 97,” which requires two-thirds approval from the state Legislature for other uses for land or easements taken or acquired for conservation purposes.

It also lists concerns with how the project was handled in city zoning review.

Mayor Wu pushed back on those claims, which included making a point to dispute assertions of privatization, stating, “To say that this would be privatizing White Stadium is either a misunderstanding or a misrepresentation.”

Advertisement

“It’s true that if this were any other park we couldn’t just build a stadium out of nowhere without any special process for that,” Wu told reporters at an unrelated event on Wednesday. “But this is an existing stadium. It’s been used by and dedicated to Boston Public School student-athletes. It will continue to be used that way so these legal claims are without merit.”

Renovations at the dilapidated park and stadium — where half of the grandstands are burned out from a recent fire — would triple the number of hours the stadium could be used, 90% of which would be dedicated to Boston Public School student-athletes and the community, the mayor said.

According to the lawsuit, Boston Unity will contribute $30 million and the city will put in roughly $50 million.

“I’m really excited about the opportunity this represents, bringing in a pro team, to help invest in and renovate an existing stadium,” Wu said.

Boston Unity Soccer Partners, an all-female ownership group, was the only respondent to the city’s request for proposals for White Stadium and won an expansion bid in September to become the National Women’s Soccer League’s 15th team.

Advertisement

It plans to start playing at the renovated stadium in the spring of 2026. Boston Unity pointed to its efforts to include the community in the restoration process, and emphasized its commitment to diversity and inclusion.

About 95% of the team will be invested by women and 40% by people of color, Boston Globe CEO Linda Pizzuti Henry is one of the investors. Boston Unity has said that construction, which includes adding 1,000 seats to the 10,000-seat stadium, would generate 500 jobs and that 300 jobs will be created permanently.

“Community collaboration is a core value of Boston Unity Soccer Partners because sports teams and stadiums by their very nature are community assets,” Boston Unity said in a statement, adding that it plans to continue that comprehensive engagement process to listen, address concerns and ensure input is reflected.

“Together we will continue this process to realize our shared vision to develop a beautiful facility that positively impacts the neighborhoods around Franklin Park, provides opportunities for Boston Public School student-athletes and greater access for surrounding communities,” the statement said.



Source link

Advertisement

Boston, MA

Red Sox insider hints Boston may have Pablo Sandoval problem with Masataka Yoshida

Published

on

Red Sox insider hints Boston may have Pablo Sandoval problem with Masataka Yoshida


The Boston Red Sox were expected to have a busy offseason to build on their short 2025 playoff appearance, their first in four seasons. Boston delivered, albeit not in the way many reporters and fans expected — Alex Bregman left and no one was traded from the outfield surplus.

Roster construction questions have loomed over the Red Sox since last season. They were emphasized by Masataka Yoshida’s return from surgery rehab and Roman Anthony’s arrival to the big leagues. Boston has four-six outfielders, depending where it envisions Yoshida and Kristian Campbell playing, and a designated hitter spot it likes to keep flexible — moving an outfielder makes the most sense to solve this quandary.

The best case-scenario for addressing the packed outfield would be to find a trade suitor for Yoshida, which has proven difficult-to-impossible over his first three seasons with the Red Sox. Red Sox insiders Chris Cotillo and Sean McAdam of MassLive think Boston may have to make an extremely difficult decision to free up Yoshida’s roster spot.

Advertisement

“You wonder, at what point does this become a — not Patrick Sandoval situation — but a Pablo Sandoval, where you rip the Band-Aid off and just release,” McAdam theorized on the “Fenway Rundown” podcast (subscription required).

Red Sox insiders wonder if/when Boston will release Masataka Yoshida, as it did with Pablo Sandoval in 2017

Pablo Sandoval is infamous among Red Sox fans. He signed a five-year, $90 million deal before the 2015 season and he only lasted two and a half years before the Red Sox cut him loose. His tenure was marked by career lows at the plate, injuries and a perceived lack of effort that soured things quickly with Boston. Yoshida hasn’t lived up to the expectations the Red Sox had when they signed him, but he’s no Sandoval.

McAdam postulated that the Red Sox may be waiting until there is less money remaining on Yoshida’s contract before they potentially release him. Like Sandoval, Yoshida signed a five-year, $90 million deal before the 2023 season, which has only just reached its halfway point. The Red Sox still owe him over $36 million, and by releasing him, they’d be forced to eat that money.

Advertisement

The amount of money remaining on Yoshida’s contract is just one obstacle that may be preventing the Red Sox from finding a trade partner to move him elsewhere. Yoshida has never played more than 140 games in a MLB season with 303 total over his three-year tenure, mostly because he’s dealt with so many injuries since moving stateside.

Advertisement

Maybe the Red Sox could attach a top prospect to him and eat some of his contract money to entice another team into a trade, like they already did with Jordan Hicks this winter. But that would require sacrificing a quality prospect and it would cost more money, just to move a good hitter who tries hard at his job.

There’s no easy way to fit Yoshida onto Boston’s roster, but the decision to salary dump or release him will be just as hard. Yoshida hasn’t been a bad player for the Red Sox and he doesn’t deserve the Sandoval treatment, but his trade value may only decrease if he spends another year with minimal playing time. Alex Cora and Craig Breslow have a real dilemma on their hands with this roster.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Thirteen states have adopted a simple criminal justice reform. It’s time for Mass. to join them. – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Thirteen states have adopted a simple criminal justice reform. It’s time for Mass. to join them. – The Boston Globe


That law is not just right. It’s also smart. But we have been lousy about putting it into practice.

Only 10 percent of those eligible to have their records sealed here have actually done it, according to The Clean Slate Initiative, an advocacy group. That’s because we’ve made it impossibly complicated.

Having a criminal record is an enormous obstacle for people who have done their time and are trying to rebuild their lives. A conviction, even a minor one, even from long ago, can mean being rejected by employers and denied by landlords. Cases that were dismissed, or which prosecutors dropped, and even many that ended in not guilty findings also show up on criminal background checks. That can keep someone from getting life insurance, credit, a real estate license, and other professional certifications. It also means they can’t volunteer at their kids’ schools or coach Little League.

“I have grown men in my office crying because they can’t get housing,” said Leslie Credle, who heads Justice 4 Housing, which helps move formerly incarcerated people into permanent homes. “Individuals who were once breadwinners come home and now they’re a burden to their family. It’s a lifetime sentence … even if you have done your time.”

Advertisement

Maybe you’ve gotten this far and are thinking this doesn’t affect you. It does.

Nearly half of US children have at least one parent with a criminal record. People with solid jobs and stable housing are more likely to support their families and communities. They are more likely to fill vacancies at all kinds of businesses that need more workers to thrive. They are also way less likely to reoffend, or to rely on public benefits.

So why have we made the process so much harder than it needs to be?

Right now, a person who has served her time and stayed out of trouble for the waiting period must petition the commissioner of probation in writing, or go before a judge. It’s needlessly complex, requiring time and familiarity with a backlogged and sometimes hostile system. And that’s if they know they can get their records sealed in the first place.

“It’s like double jeopardy,” said Shay, 36, who finally got hers sealed a few years ago. “You can’t try somebody twice for the same crime, but you can double punish them. In my case, I was punished triple.”

Advertisement

Shay, who asked that her last name be withheld, was 22 when she was convicted of carrying a dangerous weapon — a misdemeanor. She did six months in jail, paid thousands in fines and other costs, and had a successful probation. Since then, her record has held her back in ways big and small.

“I had to keep explaining it to people when I wanted to get a job and apply for housing,” she said. “I could not go on any field trips with my daughter, so now she had to suffer.” They had to stay on other people’s couches for months because a landlord ran a background check and gave an apartment to someone else.

Shay knew she could seal her record, thanks to Greater Boston Legal Services. But doing it, even with an attorney’s help, was a whole other thing. Her first application got lost somewhere between the post office and the probation department, which cost her a year. It took two years to process her second application, she said.

“Now here we are, years later, and it’s no longer a burden I have to worry about,” said Shay, who now works to help those with records get into the cannabis industry.

She’s doing well now, but why should it ever be this hard?

Advertisement

In 13 other states — including Oklahoma, Michigan, and Utah — they automatically seal criminal records after someone has met the conditions. It’s embarrassing that Massachusetts hasn’t joined them yet. Legislators have introduced measures to automatically seal eligible criminal records a bunch of times since 2019, but they’ve gone nowhere.

Clean Slate Massachusetts is working to make this time different, with the help of a huge coalition of community partners, including business leaders who understand we all thrive when more people can find work and stability. Yet again, legislators have proposed two bills that would require the state to automatically seal records in cases that are already eligible under the law.

So much about this country is messed up right now. Here is something we can actually fix.

What the heck are we waiting for?

—–

Advertisement

This story has been updated to correct the charge of which Shay was convicted.


Globe columnist Yvonne Abraham can be reached at yvonne.abraham@globe.com.





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Riders look forward to regular service after snow slows MBTA Commuter Rail line

Published

on

Riders look forward to regular service after snow slows MBTA Commuter Rail line


Most of the MBTA is back to regular service after Monday’s blizzard, but one commuter line remains on a modified schedule.

Riders of the Fall River/New Bedford MBTA Commuter Rail Line are hoping for things to be back to normal soon. The overwhelming amount of snow was still slowing things down Wednesday.

Ana Berahe is back in Brockton after traveling abroad. She’s never heard the word “delay” so many times in her life, from flights to train rides.

“I’m super happy, because it’s been three days that I was supposed to be home,” she said.

Advertisement

Phillip Eng, general manager of the MBTA and interim secretary of MassDOT, speaks about transportation in the wake of a major blizzard.

In Fall River, streets remained blanketed and cars buried with snow on Wednesday afternoon. Crews are working around the clock to make roads passable.

Keolis shared video of crews clearing train tracks Wednesday.

“I’m waiting on the train, or I’m waiting in the cold, out here, in the slush,” said commuter Aaliyah Alba.

“It was a little bit of a problem, just because they were doing the bus from Fall River to Taunton,” said Jeremy Williams of Brockton. “It was a little delayed, but other than that, it was fine.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending