Connect with us

News

This invisible Covid-19 mitigation measure is finally getting the attention it deserves | CNN

Published

on



CNN
 — 

Two-plus years into the Covid-19 pandemic, you in all probability know the fundamentals of safety: vaccines, boosters, correct handwashing and masks. However one of the crucial highly effective instruments in opposition to the coronavirus is one which consultants consider is simply beginning to get the eye it deserves: air flow.

“The problem for organizations that enhance air high quality is that it’s invisible,” mentioned Joseph Allen, director of the Wholesome Buildings Program on the Harvard T.H. Chan College of Public Well being.

It’s true: Different Covid instruments are extra tangible. However visualizing how the virus may behave in poorly ventilated areas may also help individuals higher perceive this mitigation measure.

Advertisement

Allen likens it to cigarette smoke. “If I’m smoking within the nook of a classroom and you’ve got low air flow/filtration, that room goes to refill with smoke, and everyone seems to be respiration that very same air.”

Then apply that to the outside.

“I could possibly be smoking a cigarette, you possibly can be a few ft from me, relying which manner the wind was blowing, chances are you’ll not even know I’m smoking.”

For those who’re indoors, you possibly can be inhaling much less recent air than you suppose.

“Everyone in a room collectively is consistently respiration air that simply got here out of the lungs of different individuals in that room. And relying on the air flow fee, it could possibly be as a lot as 3% or 4% of the air you’re respiration simply got here out of the lungs of different individuals in that room,” Allen mentioned.

Advertisement

He describes this as respiratory backwash.

“Usually, that’s not an issue, proper? We do that on a regular basis. We’re all the time exchanging our respiratory microbiomes with one another. But when somebody’s sick and infectious … these aerosols can carry the virus. That’s an issue.”

“We’ve identified for many years the best way to preserve individuals protected in buildings from an infection, from airborne infectious illnesses like this one,” Allen mentioned.

From the start of the pandemic, Allen and different consultants have waved pink flags, saying that the way in which we had been desirous about transmission of Covid-19 – surfaces, massive respiratory droplets – was lacking the purpose.

“Hand washing and social distancing are applicable however, in our view, inadequate to supply safety from virus-carrying respiratory microdroplets launched into the air by contaminated individuals. This drawback is particularly acute in indoor or enclosed environments, notably these which are crowded and have insufficient air flow,” a whole bunch of scientists said in an open letter in July 2020.

Advertisement

Finally, the World Well being Group and the US Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention acknowledged what the consultants had been saying all alongside: that Covid-19 may additionally unfold by small aerosolized particles that may journey greater than 6 ft.

The coronavirus itself may be very small – about 0.1 microns – however that doesn’t have an effect on how far it will possibly journey.

“The scale of the virus itself doesn’t matter as a result of, as we are saying, the virus isn’t bare in air. In different phrases, the virus is all the time touring in respiratory particles that develop in our lungs. And people are all completely different sizes,” Allen mentioned.

Singing or coughing can emit particles as massive as 100 microns (virtually the width of a human hair), he mentioned, however the virus tends to journey in smaller particles – between 1 and 5 microns.

The scale of those particles impacts not solely how far it will possibly journey however how deeply we will breathe it into our lungs, and the way we should always strategy defending ourselves from this virus.

Advertisement

“While you’re speaking about an airborne illness, there’s the what’s proper round you, you recognize, the form of the individuals who you recognize can cough in your face, the 6 ft factor, after which there’s the broader indoor air, as a result of indoor air is recirculated,” mentioned Max Sherman, a pacesetter on the Epidemic Activity Drive for the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

“Outside is safer than indoors” has grow to be an accepted mantra with Covid-19. Allen factors out that defending ourselves indoors is the place our focus ought to all the time be, even past the pandemic.

“We’re [an] indoors species. We spend 90% of our time indoors. The air we breathe indoors has an enormous impression on our well being, whether or not you consider infectious illness or the rest, nevertheless it simply has escaped the general public consciousness for a very long time,” he mentioned.

Ensuring our indoor air is wholesome isn’t that sophisticated, Sherman mentioned. “You simply wish to cut back the variety of particles that may be carrying Covid or another nasty [virus].”

The best way you do that’s by means of air flow and filtration.

Advertisement

Filtration – similar to it sounds – is filtering or cleansing the air, eradicating the contaminated particles. However consider air flow as diluting the air. You’re bringing extra recent air in to cut back the focus of these particles.

Dilution is precisely why we haven’t seen superspreader occasions open air, Allen says.

“Now we have hardly any transmission open air. Why is that? Limitless dilution, as a result of you’ve limitless air flow. And so, even in crowded protests or out of doors sporting occasions just like the Tremendous Bowl, we simply don’t see superspreading taking place. But when we did, we’d have the sign be loud and clear. We simply don’t see it. It’s all indoors in these underperforming, unhealthy areas.”

Even earlier than the appearance of HVAC programs, air flow was built-in into many constructing designs.

The 1901 Tenement Housing Act of New York required each tenement constructing – a constructing with multifamily households – to have air flow, operating water and gasoline gentle.

Advertisement

Builders added air flow to many of those buildings with a shaft within the center that runs from the roof to the bottom, permitting extra airflow.

“Within the late nineteenth century, individuals are lastly beginning to perceive how illness spreads. So airshafts and the accompanying air flow had been seen as an answer to the general public well being crises that had been taking place in tenement buildings,” mentioned Katheryn Lloyd, director of programming on the Tenement Museum. “There have been excessive instances of tuberculosis, diphtheria and different illnesses that unfold. Now we all know that unfold form of by means of the air.”

Immediately, we’re dealing with the identical problem.

“Getting fundamental air flow in your house is vital, full cease,” Sherman mentioned.

One of many best, least expensive methods to try this is to open your home windows.

Advertisement

Open doorways or home windows at reverse ends of your property to create cross-ventilation, the Environmental Safety Company advises. Opening the very best and lowest home windows – particularly if on completely different flooring – of a house may enhance air flow. Including an indoor fan can take it even additional.

“If a single fan is used, it ought to be dealing with (and blowing air) in the identical route the air is of course shifting. You may decide the route the air is of course shifting by observing the motion of drapes or by holding a lightweight material or dropping paper clippings and noting which route they transfer,” the EPA says.

Simply cracking a window may also help rather a lot, Allen says: “Even propping a window open a pair inches to actually facilitate greater air modifications, particularly in the event you do it in a number of locations in the home, so you possibly can create some stress differentials.”

It’s vital to notice that in case you have an HVAC system, it should be operating to really flow into or filter the air. The EPA says that these programs run lower than 25% of the time throughout heating and cooling seasons.

“A lot of the controls lately have a setting the place you possibly can run the fan on low on a regular basis. And that’s normally the perfect factor to do as a result of that makes certain you’re getting you’re pushing air by means of the filter on a regular basis and mixing the air up in your in your house,” Sherman suggested.

Advertisement

This could possibly be one thing to remember in the event you’re going to have guests or if somebody within the family is at greater danger for extreme sickness.

Select essentially the most environment friendly filter your HVAC system can deal with, and be sure to routinely change the filters.

Filters have a minimal effectivity reporting worth, or MERV, score that signifies how nicely they seize small particles. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends utilizing at the very least a MERV-13 filter, which it says is at the very least 85% environment friendly at capturing particles from 1 to three microns.

If that’s not an choice, transportable air filters may work nicely, however the EPA says to make use of one that’s made for the supposed room dimension and meets at the very least considered one of these standards:

  • Designed as high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)
  • CADR rated
  • Producer says the gadget will take away most particles beneath 1 micron

While you stroll into an area, there’s no good rule of thumb to go searching and gauge how well-ventilated it may be, and that may be a problem when individuals have been tasked with assessing their very own danger.

Allen suggests beginning with the fundamentals: Ensure you’re updated with vaccinations and conscious of the place Covid-19 numbers stand in your group.

Advertisement

However then it will get more durable. Even the variety of individuals in an area isn’t a giveaway of a higher-risk scenario.

“The extra individuals in there could possibly be higher-risk since you’re extra more likely to have somebody who’s infectious, but when the air flow is nice, it actually doesn’t matter.”

Air flow requirements are based mostly on “an quantity of recent air per individual, plus the quantity of recent air per sq. foot,” Allen defined. “So in case you have an excellent system, the extra folks that enter the room, the extra air flow is introduced in to the room.”

One device that may aid you assess air flow in a room is a CO2 monitor, one thing Allen needs he noticed extra in public areas. He likes to hold a transportable one, which you’ll be able to order on-line for between $100 and $200.

“For those who see below 1,000 components per million, usually, you’re hitting the air flow targets which are the design commonplace. However bear in mind, these should not health-based requirements. So we wish to see greater air flow charges.”

Advertisement

Allen prefers to see CO2 at or below 800 components per million. He additionally notes that simply because an area has low CO2 ranges, it won’t be unsafe if filtration is excessive, like on an airplane.

Atlanta Public Colleges Superintendent Lisa Herring says the set up of 5,000 air filtration items – sufficient for each classroom – in her faculty district is “a gamechanger.”

The district had begun upgrading HVAC programs in a number of faculties even earlier than the pandemic, however federal funding allowed it so as to add filtration items throughout a vital time when masks have grow to be elective.

“It provides a higher stage of confidence for us as a system to know that our air filtration programs are in place,” Herring mentioned.

College districts everywhere in the nation have been leaping on the alternative for air flow upgrades made attainable by an inflow of federal funding.

Advertisement

An evaluation in February by FutureEd, a suppose tank at Georgetown College’s McCourt College of Public Coverage, discovered that public faculties had earmarked $4.4 billion for HVAC tasks, which may develop to virtually $10 billion if tendencies continued.

New Hampshire’s Manchester College District is pouring virtually $35 million into upgrading HVAC programs, and interim Superintendent Jennifer Gillis says federal funding is “completely key.”

“You consider a district of our dimension with all of the competing calls for and the have to be fiscally accountable, a $35 million venture, that’s a big venture to introduce to our price range. Having these funds accessible to us lets us do 19 tasks – and 19 tasks in a really quick span of time.”

For Gillis, air flow has been an vital mitigation technique and an unobtrusive option to preserve individuals protected.

“It’s one thing that the majority within the constructing don’t take into consideration, nevertheless it’s a really passive manner for us to create security throughout the faculties. Because the starting, the aim was all the time ‘let’s get our youngsters in, let’s get our employees in, however let’s do it in a manner that’s protected for all of them.’ “

Advertisement

Good air flow isn’t solely about retaining college students protected from Covid-19, Sherman says. It could additionally enhance their efficiency at school.

“They’re going to study higher; they’re going to be awake extra; they’re going to be extra receptive. They’re going to be more healthy in the event that they’ve received good indoor air high quality,” he mentioned.

Serving to solidify air flow’s function within the Covid-19 battle, the Biden administration introduced a Clear Air in Buildings Problem final month.

The problem calls on constructing operators and house owners to enhance air flow by following tips laid out by the EPA.

The principle actions embrace making a clear indoor air motion plan, optimizing recent air air flow, enhancing air filtration and cleansing, and fascinating the constructing group by speaking with occupants to extend consciousness, dedication and participation.

Advertisement

The message could seem overdue, nevertheless it’s one which Allen enthusiastically welcomed.

“The White Home used its pulpit to say unequivocally that clear air and buildings matter. That’s large. No matter what you consider what is going to occur subsequent with implementation or what occurs with the funding. That may be a crystal-clear message that’s already being heard by companies, nonprofits, universities and state leaders. I see these modifications taking place already.”

News

Sanofi licensing deal doubles value of vaccine group Novavax

Published

on

Sanofi licensing deal doubles value of vaccine group Novavax

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Shares in Novavax doubled after Sanofi struck a licensing deal worth up to $1.2bn to commercialise the struggling Covid-19 vaccine maker’s coronavirus jab and use the technology to develop its own combined shot with flu.

Novavax shares were up about 100 per cent in Friday afternoon trading in New York at $8.86, moderating from a gain of as much as 146 per cent earlier in the session, following the announcement. The agreement also prompted the US biotech to remove a “going concern” notice that was issued a year ago and had put pressure on the stock.

The partnership strengthens Sanofi, one of the world’s largest vaccine makers by sales, in the post-pandemic Covid jab market, where pharmaceutical groups are increasingly focused on combined shots against two or more infectious diseases.

Advertisement

Under the agreement, Paris-based Sanofi would lead the sales push of Novavax’s Covid jab from next year in most countries and have the rights to combine the US biotech’s protein-based vaccine technology with its flu shots and other infectious disease jabs, the companies said on Friday.

Novavax will receive an upfront payment of $500mn in cash and an equity investment, and will stand to receive the remaining $700mn upon the completion of certain regulatory and development milestones.

Sanofi will take a roughly 5 per cent stake in Novavax. Novavax will also benefit from a double-digit percentage of royalties from the sales of its Covid jab as well as any combined shot using its technology, but Sanofi will take the majority of revenues.

“We’re excited by the prospect of combining Novavax’s adjuvanted Covid-19 vaccine that has shown high efficacy and favourable tolerability, with our rich portfolio of differentiated flu vaccines that have demonstrated superior protection against flu and its serious complications,” said Jean-François Toussaint, who heads Sanofi’s vaccine research and development.

Touissant said the combined shot would offer patients “enhanced convenience and protection against two serious respiratory viruses”. Sanofi had a Covid booster vaccine approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2022 but it has struggled to make a dent in the market.

Advertisement

The licensing agreement caps a tumultuous period for Novavax, whose market value boomed to more than $40bn at the height of the pandemic, propelled by investor excitement over its Covid shot. But it has since had most of its value wiped out.

The vaccine maker has undertaken a $1.1bn cost-cutting drive in the past year to stave off a possible bankruptcy and has faced pressure from an activist investor for a board shake-up.

Novavax suffered from a series of mis-steps with the launch of its Covid vaccine, which was late to market because of a sluggish approval process. It then faced collapsing demand as governments withdrew from procurement deals.

Its vaccine, a more traditional protein-based formulation combined with an adjuvant to boost its effectiveness, has been pitched to patients as a counterpoint to mRNA jabs from BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna that have inspired vaccine scepticism over rare side effects. But sales have lagged.

“Novavax is now in a stronger position to refocus our efforts on leveraging our technology platform and novel adjuvant,” said John Jacobs, Novavax chief executive.

Advertisement

Novavax will still be allowed to press ahead with the development of its combined Covid-flu shot, which is set to enter late-stage trials in the second half of this year.

Continue Reading

News

What Arizona's Mexico-born Republican congressman thinks of the border situation

Published

on

What Arizona's Mexico-born Republican congressman thinks of the border situation

Friday, March 29, 2024 Tucson, Arizona —Juan Ciscomani poses for a portrait at his offices in Tucson, Arizona on Friday, March 29, 2024. CREDIT: Ash Ponders for NPR MEArizona—

Ash Ponders/Ash Ponders for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Ash Ponders/Ash Ponders for NPR


Friday, March 29, 2024 Tucson, Arizona —Juan Ciscomani poses for a portrait at his offices in Tucson, Arizona on Friday, March 29, 2024. CREDIT: Ash Ponders for NPR MEArizona—

Ash Ponders/Ash Ponders for NPR

Juan Ciscomani made history in 2022, when he became the first naturalized U.S. citizen born in Mexico to represent Arizona in Congress.

He became a citizen in 2006 after moving to the U.S. with his family when he was 11 years old.

Advertisement

“I’m proud to be an immigrant,” Ciscomani told NPR’s Steve Inskeep during an interview with Morning Edition. “I’m proud of the journey that we traveled, to be here.”

Ciscomani, a Republican, represents Arizona’s 6th Congressional District. His district sits at the border between Mexico and the United States. The border, and the hundreds of thousands of migrants arriving there, many requesting asylum, is a key issue for his district.

Ciscomani said he speaks to people every day who have been frustrated by trying to get some form of legal status in the U.S. that isn’t asylum and how long it takes.

“They’re desperate because of how long it’s taking, ” Ciscomani said. “While the border seems to be or actually is wide open for people to just cross it illegally.”

Here’s what he had to say about Biden’s border policies, his own beliefs about immigration, and why he stands with the Republican policies for fixing the crisis at the border.

Advertisement

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity

Steve Inskeep: When did you become a Republican?

Juan Ciscomani: The moment that I registered to vote at 26, that’s the day that I signed the paperwork to become a Republican. I knew beforehand that I was conservative. I knew my values.

Inskeep: You’re hardly the only Latino Republican there. Lots. But what do you make of the fact that most people of your background vote for Democrats?

Ciscomani: Well, you’re right. It’s a growing number. The first time that I interned on Capitol Hill, there were three Hispanic Republicans in Congress. Now there’s now we have an organization of 18 of us that are Hispanic Republicans in the United States Congress. That number is growing. It should grow even more.

Advertisement

What I’m seeing, though, is an acknowledgement that those policies aren’t working for us. If you think about why people come here, if you ask my parents, it’s like, hey, why did you make the move? They’ll probably give you three main reasons. They’ll say a better job for us, the parents, better education for the kids, and safe streets. That hasn’t been the focus of many in the Democratic Party.

Friday, March 29, 2024 Tucson, Arizona —Juan Ciscomani poses for a portrait at his offices in Tucson, Arizona on Friday, March 29, 2024.

Ash Ponders/Ash Ponders for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Ash Ponders/Ash Ponders for NPR


Friday, March 29, 2024 Tucson, Arizona —Juan Ciscomani poses for a portrait at his offices in Tucson, Arizona on Friday, March 29, 2024.

Ash Ponders/Ash Ponders for NPR

Inskeep: Immigration is one of the issues that are on people’s minds in 2024. Do you assume that in your district, immigration policy will be decisive for at least some voters?

I’m not assuming. We know that for a fact. Wherever I go, this is the issue that’s on top of people’s minds. And it wasn’t always the case. Even though we’re a border district, a border state and immigration and border security has always been of interest and a priority for my district, It wasn’t always top. You know, you have other issues. Obviously, the economy, you have education, many other issues that are still important. But with the rise of the crisis and what’s happening, it’s just become a reality for people that are now impacting their daily lives. Issues like street releases of migrants wasn’t something that kept people up at night a few years ago. Now, if you talk to county officials, that is the issue. And having funding for that and and making sure that that we don’t have 1000 releases a day is what keeps them up.

Advertisement

Inskeep: As you probably know, there are a number of Republicans and people on the right who will offer a theory that Democrats are encouraging immigration, including illegal immigration, because they want them to become voters for them someday. Do you believe that?

You know the reasons why the Democrats have allowed this and why Joe Biden has allowed this? I can’t answer that. I wish I could because it’s so mind boggling to me why someone would allow this. Initially, you could think that it’s incompetence, but honestly, that claim can only go so far. You can be this incompetent to not realize what’s happening. This is an election year and even in an election year when President Biden is facing the lowest approval numbers ever and border security and immigration is the number one issue, that issue has failed at the hands of Democrats. He’s still not doing anything about it.

It’s unprecedented what has happened. Even Barack Obama at least pretended to care about border security. We thought President Obama was lagging on the enforcement side until, of course, came Biden. And he showed what really not caring about the border looks like. So the reasons and the theories and the speculations can be out there, but you just got to see where they’re going. They’re going to states where people are leaving those states like, you know, California or Illinois or New York. That’s where the majority of these migrants ended up landing. Which is bad for the communities there, but it’s bad for the country overall.

Inskeep: Trump has even connected immigrants in this country to his election difficulties. He had a theory that he lost the popular vote in 2016 because illegal immigrants voted no evidence of that whatsoever. Is he scapegoating immigrants?

Listen, I’m not going to speculate on the comments of the president or even try to interpret what he meant by those things. My border state is seeing the consequences of that and we need to stop it. The policies that President Trump had three years ago, three and a half years ago, did not cause any of this. Not one legislative law has changed now. Every change that Joe Biden has done, he’s done it through executive order. And those changes have cost where we are today. So what we cannot do is continue to govern this country by executive order. I am glad that President Trump did what he had to do on the border by executive order because he didn’t have the support of Congress to make sure that we supported the border. But he did it by executive order, which we learned is not sustainable because the next president can come in and change everything on day one, which is what Joe Biden did. And cost is the worst crisis in American history on the border.

Advertisement

The audio version of this story was produced by Lilly Quiroz. The digital version was edited by Obed Manuel.

Continue Reading

News

Eurovision’s unity message tested by backlash over Israel

Published

on

Eurovision’s unity message tested by backlash over Israel

Eurovision organisers are braced for thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters to flood the Swedish city of Malmö this weekend to protest against Israel’s participation in the song contest.

This year will be the most politically charged event in its history after Israel’s contestant Eden Golan qualified for Saturday’s final.

The broadcasting union that runs the contest maintains Eurovision is “a unifying force, bringing together nations and cultures through the power of music”. But while the annual party often carries an undertone of geopolitics — and has included Israel for half a century — Israel’s involvement this year has increased tensions amid the country’s offensive in Gaza.

Heavily armed police have been deployed to monitor the pro-Palestinian protests in the Eurovision Village, which serves the 100,000 fans expected to descend on Sweden’s third-largest city for the event.

On Thursday, ahead of Golan’s semi-final performance, thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters — including climate activist Greta Thunberg — staged demonstrations in the city. Golan, who was booed by audience members during dress rehearsals, said she was focused on “giving the best performance”.

Advertisement

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement that the singer had “already succeeded . . . you face a wave of antisemitism while standing and representing the State of Israel with respect”.

The tensions have already coloured the competition. Ireland’s contestant, nonbinary “goth gremlin” Bambie Thug who has already qualified for the final, said on Instagram they had been asked to remove pro-Palestinian body paint from their costume. The writing in a medieval script had included the words “Free Palestine” and “ceasefire”.

Ireland’s Bambie Thug performing at the Eurovision semi-final on Tuesday © Jens Büttner/dpa

The European Broadcasting Union, which runs the event, has said it will bar flags and symbols apart from those of participating countries and the LGBT+ community.

Bambie Thug added in the post: “My heart and prayers are with the people of Palestine . . . I am anti-war, anti-occupation, anti-oppression and anti-killing of innocent civilians and children!!”

Hundreds of artists in each of the five Nordic countries including Sweden signed separate petitions earlier this year urging Eurovision to ban Israel from the competition, while many of the 26 artists performing in Malmö have faced social media abuse for taking part alongside the Israeli act.

Advertisement

Britain’s Eurovision artist Olly Alexander was among those who signed a letter in response to calls for a boycott, arguing instead for the “unifying power of music”.

Israel’s national security council urged its citizens not to travel to Malmö, calling it “an anti-Israel protest hub”. Israeli media reported that the Shin Bet security service advised Golan not to leave her hotel room for anything other than her performances.

She has already changed the words of the song “Hurricane”, initially called “October Rain”, after it was seen to refer to the devastating October 7 attacks by Hamas last year that killed 1,200 people and sparked the war in Gaza. Almost 35,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel’s retaliatory offensive.

Earlier in the contest, Swedish singer Eric Saade was reprimanded by organisers after he wore a Palestinian keffiyeh scarf around his wrist during a performance.

Jean Philip De Tender, deputy director-general of the EBU, said the organiser acknowledged “the depth of feeling and the strong opinions that this year’s Eurovision Song Contest — set against the backdrop of a terrible war in the Middle East — has provoked”. 

Advertisement

But De Tender said online abuse and harassment of artists was “unacceptable and totally unfair, given the artists have no role” in deciding which broadcasters take part.

Eric Saade performing his song during the Eurovision semi-final
Swedish singer Eric Saade at the Eurovision semi-final © Martin Meissner/AP

The EBU represents Europe’s broadcasters, including Israeli’s Kan, a member since 1957 and a participant in the song contest since 1973.

Eurovision is the latest cultural event to face controversy over the inclusion of Israel, with similar calls for a boycott at the Venice Biennale late last year and clashes over other film and artistic events in Europe.

The singing competition, which is broadcast to more than 200mn people worldwide, maintains it is “non-political” but is no stranger to being used for political motives. Pacts between groups of similarly minded or geographically close nations often ensure that their acts progress, while rivals are handed “nul points”.

Russia, a former participant, was banned a day after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Ukraine won the contest the following year, an outcome seen as an outpouring of support for the war-torn nation rather than the quality of its musical offering. Another political flashpoint was the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

In 2009, Georgia tried to submit a song “We Don’t Wanna Put In”, widely interpreted as a criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Organisers rejected the song.

Advertisement

After Israel was included in the 1970s, Arabic broadcasters refused to show Israeli artists and threatened not to show the contest at all in years when it was hosted by the Jewish state. Israel has won several times, including with transgender singer Dana International in 1998.

Dana International performing
Israel’s Dana International won in 1998 © Peter Bischoff/Getty Images

Local dynamics have compounded the pressure this year. Home to one of Sweden’s largest immigrant populations, many of them Muslims, Malmö has suffered from a reputation for antisemitic incidents. That culminated in videos of cars driving around the city celebrating Hamas’s attack on Israel in October, as well as protesters burning an Israeli flag next to Malmö’s synagogue in November.

Tensions have risen further since Swedish police allowed a couple — one of them wrapped in an Israeli flag — to burn a Koran at the weekend. Sweden’s successful bid to join Nato was delayed for more than a year over multiple incidents involving Koran burning by anti-Islam activists.

Malmö officials apologised this week after cleaning away pro-Palestinian graffiti ahead of the competition, saying it was “an unfortunate mistake”.

Protesters marching in Stockholm
Pro-Palestinian protesters holding a rally in Stockholm in February © Fredrik Persson/TT NEWS AGENCY/AFP/Getty Images

The contest’s organisers have also sought to defuse the situation. EBU boss Noel Curran said it was a “competition between public service broadcasters who are members of the EBU. It is not a contest between governments.”

Curran said the EBU had been aware “of the many voices calling to exclude Israel in the same way as we excluded the Russian broadcaster in 2022 “.

But he added: “Comparisons between wars and conflicts are complex and difficult and . . . not ours to make. In the case of Russia, the Russian broadcasters themselves were suspended from the EBU due to their persistent breaches of membership obligations and the violation of public service values.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending