Connect with us

News

NASA set to unveil the crew of astronauts for moon flyby mission | CNN

Published

on

NASA set to unveil the crew of astronauts for moon flyby mission | CNN

Join CNN’s Surprise Concept science publication. Discover the universe with information on fascinating discoveries, scientific developments and extra.



CNN
 — 

4 astronauts — together with three People and one Canadian — can be tapped by NASA to finish a generation-defining mission to the moon’s orbit, returning people to deeper into the photo voltaic system than has been reached in 5 a long time.

On Monday, the general public will lastly study the crew members’ names.

Scheduled to launch in 2024, Artemis II would be the program’s first crewed mission to orbit the moon, flying farther into house than any people for the reason that Apollo program. It is going to pave the way in which for the Artemis III crew to stroll on the moon in 2025, all aboard the world’s strongest rocket and at a price ticket that by then will method $100 billion.

Advertisement

Following months of closed-door determination making, NASA officers plan to unveil the names of the crew members in a ceremony scheduled for Monday at 11 am ET.

Although officers have remained tight-lipped about their decisions, CNN beforehand spoke with practically a dozen present and former NASA officers and astronauts to drag again the curtain on the secretive choice course of.

Reid Wiseman, a 47-year-old adorned naval aviator and take a look at pilot who was first chosen to be a NASA astronaut in 2009, is on the high of the listing, in response to CNN’s prior reporting.

Wiseman served as chief of the astronaut workplace till November 2022. Whereas the chief isn’t permitted to fly whereas holding the publish, they’re able to wrangle one of the best flight assignments upon stepping down, an “acknowledged perk” of the job, in response to former NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman.

Advertisement

Earlier than stepping down as astronaut chief, Wiseman was additionally accountable for the choice to broaden the pool of astronauts eligible to fly with a view to embody himself. Whereas NASA had initially deemed 18 astronauts to be the “Artemis Crew” and eligible to fly on moon missions, Wiseman expanded the group of candidates to all 41 lively NASA astronauts.

Individuals accustomed to the method additionally instructed CNN that together with Wiseman, there are a handful of different candidates atop the listing:

  • Randy Bresnik, 55, can also be a adorned naval aviator and take a look at pilot who flew fight missions in assist of Operation Iraqi Freedom. He has flown two missions to the Worldwide House Station: one on the House Shuttle, one other on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft. Bresnik is usually talked about as a high contender for Artemis as a result of, since 2018, he has overseen the astronaut workplace’s improvement and testing of all rockets and spacecraft that can be used within the Artemis missions.
  • Anne McClain, 43, is a adorned military pilot and West Level graduate who flew greater than 200 fight missions in assist of Operation Iraqi Freedom and went on to graduate from the US Naval Check Pilot College in 2013, the identical 12 months she was chosen to be a NASA astronaut. After launching on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft in 2018, she spent greater than 200 days on the Worldwide House Station and served because the lead of two spacewalks.
  • Stephanie Wilson is essentially the most senior astronaut on this listing. The 56-year-old joined NASA’s 1996 astronaut class, and she or he served as a mission specialist on three House Shuttle flights, together with the primary flight after the 2003 Columbia catastrophe, which killed seven astronauts.
  • Christina Koch, 44, is a veteran of six spacewalks. She holds the file for the longest single spaceflight by a girl, with a complete of 328 days in house. Koch can also be an {an electrical} engineer who helped develop scientific devices for a number of NASA mission. She’s additionally spent a 12 months on the South Pole, an arduous keep that would properly put together her for the depth of a moon mission.
  • Jessica Meir is 45-year-old biologist with a doctorate from the Scripps Establishment of Oceanography. She was a member of a NASA Excessive Surroundings Mission Operations (NEEMO) mission in 2002, which concerned spending days in an underwater analysis facility, and, in 2016, accomplished a two-week caving mission in Italy.

Koch and Meir collectively performed the primary three all-female spacewalks in 2019 and 2020.

Rounding out the Artemis II crew can be one astronaut from Canada, phrases that have been cemented in a 2020 treaty between the 2 international locations.

The Canadian House Company’s at present has a cadre of simply 4 astronauts, however amongst them, Jeremy Hansen has generated essentially the most buzz, in response to CNN’s reporting. Hansen was chosen to be an astronaut nearly 14 years in the past, however he’s nonetheless ready for his first flight project. The 47-year-old fighter pilot lately grew to become the primary Canadian to be put answerable for coaching for a brand new class of NASA astronauts.

NASA has additionally beforehand dedicated to deciding on a crew with racial, gender {and professional} variety.

Advertisement

These standards haven’t traditionally been the case for high-profile missions. Going again to the Gemini period, astronauts chosen for inaugural crewed missions have been solely White and male, and sometimes come from a background as a army take a look at pilot — a profile notably characterised within the 1979 guide “The Proper Stuff” by Tom Wolfe.

That has held true by means of NASA’s most up-to-date inaugural crewed flight, of SpaceX’s Crew Dragon capsule to the Worldwide House Station in 2020, which included former army take a look at pilots Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley.

And it might maintain largely true for the Artemis II mission as properly: Almost a dozen present and former NASA officers and astronauts instructed CNN they anticipated a number of take a look at pilots being named.

Nonetheless, if Wiseman, a White man, is chosen, which means the opposite spots will nearly definitely have to go to at the very least one lady and at the very least one individual of coloration.

The Artemis II mission will construct on Artemis I, an uncrewed take a look at mission that despatched NASA’s Orion capsule on a 1.4 million-mile voyage to lap the moon that concluded in December. The house company deemed that mission a hit and continues to be working to evaluate all the information collected.

Advertisement

If all goes to plan, Artemis II will take off round November 2024. The crew members, strapped contained in the Orion spacecraft, will launch atop a NASA-developed House Launch System rocket from NASA’s Kennedy House Heart in Florida.

The journey is predicted to final about 10 days and can ship the crew out past the moon, doubtlessly additional than any human has traveled in historical past, although the precise distance is but to be decided.

The “actual distance past the Moon will depend upon the day of liftoff and the relative distance of the Moon from the Earth on the time of the mission,” NASA spokesperson Kathryn Hambleton stated by way of electronic mail.

After circling the moon, the spacecraft will return to Earth for a splashdown touchdown within the Pacific Ocean.

Artemis II is predicted to pave the way in which for the Artemis III mission later this decade, which NASA has vowed will put the primary lady and individual of coloration on the lunar floor. It is going to additionally mark the primary time people have touched down on the moon for the reason that Apollo program led to 1972.

Advertisement

The Artemis III mission is predicted to take off later this decade. However a lot of the expertise the mission would require, together with spacesuits for strolling on the moon and a lunar lander to ferry the astronauts to the moon’s floor, continues to be in improvement.

NASA is focusing on a 2025 launch date for Artemis III, although the house company’s inspector normal has already stated delays will probably push the mission to 2026 or later.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

What does Elon Musk’s China trip mean for Tesla?

Published

on

What does Elon Musk’s China trip mean for Tesla?

Elon Musk appears to be on the cusp of deploying Tesla’s “full self-driving” system in the world’s biggest car market.

Musk flew out of Beijing on Monday after meeting China’s premier, Li Qiang, on Sunday and sealing a deal with Chinese tech giant Baidu to use the group’s mapping and navigation systems. Hours earlier, a Chinese industry group said Tesla’s EVs were among more than 70 cars that had been successfully tested for data security compliance.

Taken together, Musk appears to have smoothed the path for the US company’s semi-autonomous driving technology to be rolled out in China. Tesla’s share price closed 15.3 per cent higher on Monday at $194.05 on reports of the Baidu deal but remains at half of its 2022 peak.

Here is what the billionaire’s trip to China means for Tesla and the government in Beijing.

How much is Chinese approval worth to Tesla?

As sales fall and competition grows fiercer, Tesla has increasingly talked up the commercial opportunities that its self-driving technology offers.

Advertisement

“Going balls to the wall on autonomy is a blindingly obvious move,” Musk wrote on X, his social media platform, this month.

Tom Narayan, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said income from autonomous driving accounted for a fifth of his share price target for Tesla. The carmaker charges US drivers $99 a month to activate “full self-driving”, a partially autonomous system that ostensibly chauffeurs drivers but still requires motorists to pay attention.

Being allowed to offer the same service in China, where the company has about 1.6mn cars on the road, “would unlock a significant fleet of Tesla vehicles able to charge subscription fees”, said Narayan.

The move into China would also “push Tesla further to be an industry standard for software,” he added, and encourage other carmakers to license its technology.

Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush, said Musk’s trip resulted in the “long-awaited FSD approval”, which amounted to a “watershed moment” for the company. Tesla’s long-term valuation “hinges” on income from autonomy, he said, and China had been a “missing piece of the puzzle”.

Advertisement

“This is a key moment for Musk as well as Beijing at a time that Tesla has faced massive domestic EV competition in China along with softer demand,” he added.

Will new technology turn around slowing sales growth at Tesla? 

Tesla has put significant stock in the value of globalising its self-driving technology as its core EV line-up ages compared with newer products from its Chinese rivals.

While arch-rival BYD aims to launch cars within 18 months of conception, it has been four years since Tesla released the Model Y, its best-selling car. The company announced the Roadster sports car in 2017 but has yet to begin production.

Musk last week promised that a new lower-cost model was coming next year. But despite a “refreshed” Model 3 entering production this year, the company is still nurturing a product offering that is significantly older than that of its competitors.

“The Tesla range is looking quite old,” said one former Tesla executive. “The [battery] tech is fine, but there are others out there, especially the Chinese, who are arguably better. The question [if he deploys FSD], is how much longer does he have a technology advantage on that?”

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Expansion in China will be a test of how Tesla’s self-driving technology stacks up against local rivals. “They are betting it is the tech that makes or breaks a purchase decision,” said the former executive. 

But it is not clear how confident consumers outside of urban areas are in the technology. “FSD works in Silicon Valley but not in Illinois,” added the former executive. “For the mass market it is still witchcraft.”

Why is helping Tesla important to China?

Under President Xi Jinping, many experts believe China has prioritised security over economic growth and domestic technology independence over integration with the outside world.

Angela Zhang, a professor of law at the University of Hong Kong and author of two books on Chinese technology regulation, said there were signs that Beijing was “easing” its approach as it needed foreign investment to shore up an economy in “deep trouble”.

Chinese EV producers want to dominate global markets and Beijing has a “strong incentive” to show the world that data security issues are not a barrier to international trade for Chinese EVs, she said.

Advertisement

Feng Chucheng, a partner at China-focused Hutong Research, said allowing Tesla’s self-driving technology had “strategic value” to Beijing.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

The Cyberspace Administration of China has for several years been rolling out a sweeping legal framework for how businesses collect and use data, with strict rules on cross-border data flows and data viewed as a risk to Chinese security or citizens.

Despite western concerns about “over-securitisation”, the recent development of China’s data rules has been more “pro-growth”, Feng said. Beijing has been aligning its rules on outbound data transfer in line with the CPTPP and DEPA, two key regional trade pacts.

“Tesla’s rollout in China will be much desired for Beijing to prove that its data regulatory regime is gaining traction,” he said.

Can Tesla win back the Chinese market?

China is Tesla’s biggest market outside the US, a vital part of the supply chain for its electric vehicles and of growing importance as a regional export hub. Musk’s decision in 2018 to build a multibillion-dollar factory in Shanghai is credited with helping to spearhead the rapid growth of China’s EV industry.

Advertisement

But since then, the Chinese EV industry has stormed ahead. Tesla’s share of new electric vehicle sales stands at 7.5 per cent compared with 33 per cent for Warren Buffett-backed BYD. A core complaint from Chinese consumers has been the dearth of new Tesla models and high-tech features.

Despite the share price jump on Monday, analysts in China voiced caution.

Tom Nunlist, an expert in Chinese technology regulation with Beijing-based consultancy Trivium, said China’s regulatory environment was “still emerging”. “The folks that are overseeing the safety of automatic driving on highways are highly professional. They’re not going to relax their standards because of this [Musk’s visit],” he said.

Tu Le, founder of the Sino Auto Insights consultancy, said local rivals including Xpeng, Nio and Li Auto had their own self-driving systems and would drop their prices “the second” they thought consumers favoured Tesla’s technology. “Western analysts think Tesla automatically wins,” he said. “There are no guarantees.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

How today's college protests echo history : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

How today's college protests echo history : Consider This from NPR

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

A pro-Palestinian protester stands among tents and a Palestinian flag at an encampment at Columbia University campus in New York earlier this month.

LEONARDO MUNOZ/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

LEONARDO MUNOZ/AFP via Getty Images


A pro-Palestinian protester stands among tents and a Palestinian flag at an encampment at Columbia University campus in New York earlier this month.

LEONARDO MUNOZ/AFP via Getty Images

1. The 2024 protests have an “uncanny” resemblance to the 1968 student protests.

From coast to coast, dozens of universities are seeing pro-Palestinian protests and encampments on campuses across the U.S.:

Advertisement
  • Boston police took down a pro-Palestinian encampment at Emerson College, clashing with protesters and taking more than 100 into custody.
  • In just the past two weeks, at least 800 people have been arrested on college campuses, with some students facing suspension. Some universities are grappling with whether to proceed with upcoming graduation ceremonies.
  • The University of Southern California put out a statement recently canceling its main graduation ceremony due to “safety measures.”

The last time the U.S. saw such fervor over protests on college campuses was some five decades ago.

Frank Guridy is a professor of history at Columbia University, where roughly a hundred students have been arrested.

Guridy teaches a class about the 1968 protests against the Vietnam war that took place on Columbia’s campus. He teaches in one of the buildings that students occupied in 1968 – Fayerweather Hall.

“As in 1968, the Columbia students of 2024 are absolutely galvanized by what’s transpiring in Gaza, in the Middle East,” Guridy said in an interview with NPR.

“In that sense, it is an uncanny resemblance to what transpired in the late sixties in this country, where U.S. students and other people in this country were inspired to speak out and mobilize against what they saw as an unjust war in Vietnam.”

2. Parallels and differences.

In Guridy’s class, students read historical texts that put the 1968 protests in a larger historical context. Students visit archives at Columbia and other parts of the city. At the end of the semester, they complete a research paper on what they’ve learned about the 1968 student protests.

Advertisement

“Students on this campus, a generation of students who have no direct connection to ’68. Yet what they see in it is as a source of inspiration,” Guridy said.

A key similarity between the protests of 1968 and 2024 are the calls for divestment. In the ’60s, students at college campuses tried to get their administrations to divest from the defense industry or anything connected to the war in Vietnam.

Guridy adds that the strategy of divestment has a long history that can even be traced back to the 1930s, when people were calling for the boycotting of Nazi Germany.

Today’s students are also targeting the financial choices made by their administrations.

Two of the main differences: the U.S. doesn’t have boots on the ground in Gaza, and American college students aren’t facing the draft.

Advertisement

“The draft was a real reality, including for privileged college students in the late 1960s. And so the sense of urgency was slightly different for the college students and the antiwar movement at that time,” says Guridy.

3. Lessons learned from 1968 protests.

Several student activists who spoke to NPR cited the organizing of students in 1968 as inspiration for their own movements.

Matthew Vickers, a junior at Occidental College in Los Angeles is one of the many students to set up encampments protesting Israel’s war in Gaza.

“Most of the Palestinian solidarity movement has taken direct tactical and moral inspiration from the movements of the sixties. I think the parallels cannot be more obvious,” said Vickers.

Alifa Chowdhury is a junior at the University of Michigan, and one of the protest organizers on her campus. Their encampment on the Diag is on the exact spot where students in the Sixties marched against the Vietnam War.

Advertisement

“So we’re building on things that have been done before, this is not a new phenomenon. We stand on that protest history today,said Chowdhury.

This episode was produced by Noah Cadwell and Brianna Scott. It was edited by Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.

Continue Reading

News

Skydance sweetens Paramount bid with $3bn cash infusion

Published

on

Skydance sweetens Paramount bid with $3bn cash infusion

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Skydance and Shari Redstone’s holding company are offering a $3bn investment in Paramount in an effort to win support for a complex merger that has frustrated investors and led to the departure of the Hollywood group’s chief executive.

The offer, which includes $2bn in cash to common shareholders, came as Paramount chief executive Bob Bakish resigned on Monday, raising new questions about the future of the Hollywood group behind The Godfather

Redstone said on Monday: “The board and I thank Bob for his many contributions over his long career . . . we wish him all the best.”

Advertisement

Redstone and Paramount’s board, which she chairs, have been trying to agree a deal to merge the company with David Ellison’s Skydance, the production company backed by his billionaire father, Larry Ellison, as well as RedBird Capital and KKR. 

Under the latest terms of the deal, Skydance would buy Redstone’s National Amusements for less than $2bn, not as much as previously discussed between the two sides, said people briefed about the matter.

Those people added that Paramount would then merge with Skydance, valuing Ellison’s company at about $5bn in an all-stock deal. The combination would value the existing common shares of Paramount about 30 per cent above its current trading share price.

The Ellison-led consortium would also invest a further $3bn in the combined company, the people said. Two-thirds of the investment would pay cash to holders of common shares by buying back their stock, with the remainder used to reduce Paramount’s debt.

Shareholders would have the option to either sell their shares in Paramount or keep the stock of the combined company, or a combination of the two, as the buyback would be limited to a maximum amount of $2bn. Paramount’s Class B common shares have a current market capitalisation of about $7bn.

Advertisement

Paramount has a dual-class shareholding structure. Redstone’s NAI controls nearly 80 per cent of voting rights, but holds only 10 per cent of equity ownership. Many Paramount shareholders baulked at a previously proposed merger structure, which they argued would benefit Redstone at the cost of common shareholders. 

Redstone would remain an investor in the combined Paramount-Skydance, a move that aims to show her conviction that the Ellison-led group would turn round the fortunes of Paramount, which has struggled to compete with larger rivals such as Netflix in an expensive “streaming war”.

“There will be more alignment between [Redstone’s] interest and shareholders than before,” said one person familiar with the arrangement.

The Paramount board has set up a special committee to evaluate the plan.  

Paramount on Monday said a team of three executives — George Cheeks, Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins — would replace Bakish, establishing an “office of the CEO”.

Advertisement

Bakish, who had worked at the company and its predecessor Viacom for a quarter of a century, had previously been an ally of Redstone, who promoted him to chief executive of Viacom in 2016. But their relationship has deteriorated in recent months, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Bakish was paid a total of $31.5mn in 2023, according to a regulatory filing. 

Private equity group Apollo, in partnership with rival studio Sony, is also preparing to bid on Paramount as soon as this week, according to people familiar with the situation. Paramount recently rejected Apollo’s $26bn all-cash offer, and four members of the Paramount board have since withdrawn their names for re-election in June.

Paramount on Monday reported a net loss of $554mn on $7.7bn in revenue in the first quarter. The company did not take questions on its earnings call, which lasted less than 10 minutes.

“There’s no dressing this up — looks like a car crash with clear divisions among key stakeholders,” said analyst Paolo Pescatore at PP Insights.

Advertisement

“The latest chapter in this ongoing saga looks to be taking another turn for the worse.”

Continue Reading

Trending