Connect with us

News

Inside the long and winding road to Trump’s historic indictment | CNN Politics

Published

on

Inside the long and winding road to Trump’s historic indictment | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

The New York grand jury listening to the case in opposition to Donald Trump was set to interrupt for a number of weeks. The previous president’s legal professionals believed on Wednesday afternoon they’d at the very least a small reprieve from a potential indictment. Trump praised the perceived delay.

Manhattan District Legal professional Alvin Bragg had different plans.

Thursday afternoon, Bragg requested the grand jury to return an historic indictment in opposition to Trump, the primary time {that a} present or former US president has been indicted. The shock transfer was the ultimate twist in an investigation that’s taken a protracted and winding street to the history-making costs that had been returned this week.

Advertisement

An indictment had been anticipated early final week – together with by Trump himself, who promoted a idea he could be “arrested” – as legislation enforcement businesses ready for the logistics of arraigning a former president. However after the testimony of Robert Costello – a lawyer who appeared on Trump’s behalf in search of to undercut the credibility of Trump’s former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen – Bragg appeared to hit the pause button.

Costello’s testimony brought on the district lawyer’s workplace to reassess whether or not Costello must be the final witness the grand jury heard earlier than prosecutors requested them to vote on an indictment, a number of sources instructed CNN.

In order that they waited. The subsequent day the grand jury was scheduled to fulfill, jurors had been instructed to not are available in. Bragg and his high prosecutors huddled the remainder of the week and over the weekend to find out a method that might successfully counter Costello’s testimony within the grand jury.

They referred to as two extra witnesses. David Pecker, the previous head of the corporate that publishes the Nationwide Enquirer, appeared on Monday. The opposite witness, who has nonetheless not been recognized, testified on Thursday for 35 minutes in entrance of the grand jury – simply earlier than prosecutors requested them to vote on the indictment of greater than 30 counts, the sources mentioned.

Trump and his attorneys, considering Bragg may be reconsidering a possible indictment, had been all caught off-guard, sources mentioned. A few of Trump’s advisers had even left Palm Seaside on Wednesday following information studies that the grand jury was taking a break, the sources added.

Advertisement

After the indictment, Trump ate dinner together with his spouse, Melania, Thursday night and smiled whereas he greeted friends at his Mar-a-Lago membership, in line with a supply conversant in the occasion.

The Manhattan district lawyer’s investigation into Trump has been ongoing for years, courting again to Bragg’s predecessor, Cy Vance. Its focus shifted by mid-2020 to the accuracy of the Trump Org.’s monetary statements. On the time, prosecutors debated authorized theories across the hush cash funds and thought they had been a protracted shot. At a number of factors, the wide-ranging investigation appeared to have been winding down – to the purpose that prosecutors resigned in protest final 12 months. One even wrote a e-book important of Bragg for not pursuing costs in opposition to Trump launched simply final month.

The particular costs in opposition to nonetheless Trump stay below seal and are anticipated to be unveiled Tuesday when Trump is ready to be arraigned.

There are questions swirling even amongst Trump critics over whether or not the Manhattan district lawyer’s case is the strongest in opposition to the previous president amid extra investigations in Washington, DC, and Georgia over each his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his dealing with of categorised paperwork at his Florida resort.

Trump may nonetheless face costs in these probes, too, that are separate from the New York indictment.

Advertisement

Nevertheless it’s the Manhattan indictment, courting again to a cost made earlier than the 2016 presidential election, that now sees Trump going through down prison costs for the primary time as he runs once more for the White Home in 2024.

It was simply weeks earlier than the 2016 election when Cohen, Trump’s then-lawyer, paid grownup movie actress Stormy Daniels $130,000 to maintain silent about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Cohen was later reimbursed $420,000 by the Trump Group to cowl the unique cost and tax liabilities and to reward him with a bonus.

That cost and reimbursement are keys at challenge within the investigation.

Cohen additionally helped prepare a $150,000 cost from the writer of the Nationwide Enquirer to Karen McDougal to kill her story claiming a 10-month affair with Trump. Trump additionally denies an affair with McDougal. Through the grand jury proceedings, the district lawyer’s workplace has requested questions concerning the “catch and kill” take care of McDougal.

When Cohen was charged by federal prosecutors in New York in 2018 and pleaded responsible, he mentioned he was appearing on the route of Trump when he made the cost.

Advertisement

On the time, federal prosecutors had decided they may not search to indict Trump within the scheme due to US Justice Division rules in opposition to charging a sitting president. In 2021, after Trump left the White Home, prosecutors within the Southern District of New York determined to not pursue a case in opposition to Trump, in line with a current e-book from CNN senior authorized analyst Elie Honig.

However then-Manhattan District Legal professional Vance’s workforce had already picked up the investigation into the hush cash funds and begun taking a look at potential state legislation violations. By summer season 2019, they despatched subpoenas to the Trump Org., different witnesses, and met with Cohen, who was serving a three-year jail sentence.

Vance’s investigation broadened to the Trump Org.’s funds. New York prosecutors went to the Supreme Courtroom twice to implement a subpoena for Trump’s tax information from his long-time accounting agency Mazars USA. The Trump Org. and its long-time chief monetary officer Allen Weisselberg had been indicted on tax fraud and different costs in June 2021 for allegedly operating an off-the-books compensation scheme for greater than a decade.

Weisselberg pleaded responsible to the fees final 12 months and is at the moment serving a five-month sentence at Rikers Island. Prosecutors had hoped to flip Weisselberg to cooperate in opposition to Trump, however he wouldn’t tie Trump to any wrongdoing.

Disagreements concerning the tempo of the investigation had brought on at the very least three profession prosecutors to maneuver off the investigation. They had been involved that the investigation was shifting too shortly, with out clear proof to help potential costs, CNN and others reported final 12 months.

Advertisement

Vance licensed the attorneys on the workforce to current proof to the grand jury close to the tip of 2021, however he didn’t search an indictment. These near Vance say he wished to depart the choice to Bragg, the newly elected district lawyer.

Bragg, a Democrat, took workplace in January 2022. Lower than two months into his tenure, two high prosecutors who had labored on the Trump case below Vance abruptly resigned amid a disagreement within the workplace over the power of the case in opposition to Trump.

On February 22, 2022, Bragg knowledgeable the prosecution workforce that he was not ready to authorize costs in opposition to Trump, CNN reported. The prosecutors, Carey Dunne and Mark Pomerantz, resigned the subsequent day.

In his resignation letter, Pomerantz mentioned he believed Trump was responsible of quite a few felonies and mentioned that Bragg’s resolution to not transfer ahead with an indictment on the time was “mistaken” and a “grave failure of justice.”

“I and others consider that your resolution to not authorize prosecution now will doom any future prospects that Mr. Trump can be prosecuted for the prison conduct we now have been investigating,” Pomerantz wrote within the letter, which was reviewed by CNN.

Advertisement

At that time, the investigation was targeted on Trump’s monetary statements and whether or not he knowingly misled lenders, insurers, and others by offering them false or deceptive details about the worth of his properties.

Prosecutors had been constructing a wide-ranging falsified enterprise information case to incorporate years of monetary statements and the hush cash funds, individuals with direct information of the investigation instructed CNN. However on the time, these prosecutors believed there was a superb likelihood a felony cost associated to the hush cash cost could be dismissed by a decide as a result of it was a novel authorized idea.

Dunne and Pomerantz pushed to hunt an indictment of Trump tied to the sweeping falsified enterprise information case, however others, together with some profession prosecutors, had been skeptical that they may win a conviction at trial, partly due to the issue in proving Trump’s prison intent.

Regardless of the resignations of the prosecutors on the Trump case, Bragg’s workplace reiterated on the time that the investigation was ongoing.

“Investigations will not be linear so we’re following the leads in entrance of us. That’s what we’re doing,” Bragg instructed CNN in April 2022. “The investigation could be very a lot ongoing.”

Advertisement

On the identical time that Bragg’s prison investigation into Trump lingered final 12 months, one other prosecution in opposition to the Trump Org. moved ahead. In December, two Trump Org. entities had been convicted at trial on 17 counts and had been ordered to pay $1.6 million, the utmost penalty, the next month.

Trump was not personally charged in that case. Nevertheless it appeared to embolden Bragg’s workforce to sharpen their focus again to Trump and the hush cash cost.

Cohen was introduced again in to fulfill with Manhattan prosecutors. Cohen had beforehand met with prosecutors within the district lawyer’s workplace 13 instances over the course of the investigation. However the January assembly was the primary in additional than a 12 months – and a transparent signal of the route prosecutors had been taking.

As investigators inched nearer to a charging resolution, Bragg was confronted with extra public stress to indict Trump: Pomerantz, the prosecutor who had resigned a 12 months prior, launched a e-book concerning the investigation that argued Trump must be charged and criticized Bragg for failing to take action.

“Each single member of the prosecution workforce thought that his guilt was established,” Pomerantz mentioned in a February interview on “CNN This Morning.”

Advertisement

Requested about Bragg’s hesitance, Pomerantz mentioned: “I can’t converse intimately about what went by his thoughts. I can surmise from what occurred on the time and statements that he’s made since that he had misgivings concerning the power of the case.”

Bragg responded in an announcement saying that extra work was wanted on the case. “Mr. Pomerantz’s aircraft wasn’t prepared for takeoff,” Bragg mentioned.

Prosecutors continued bringing in witnesses, together with Pecker, the previous head of American Media Inc., which publishes the Nationwide Enquirer. In February, Trump Org. controller Jeffrey McConney testified earlier than the grand jury. Members of Trump’s 2016 marketing campaign, together with Kellyanne Conway and Hope Hicks, additionally appeared. In March, Daniels met with prosecutors, her lawyer mentioned.

And Cohen, after his quite a few conferences with prosecutors, lastly testified earlier than the grand jury in March.

The second week of March, prosecutors gave the clearest signal thus far that the investigation was nearing its conclusion – they invited Trump to seem earlier than the grand jury.

Advertisement

Potential defendants in New York are required by legislation to be notified and invited to seem earlier than a grand jury weighing costs.

Behind the scenes, Trump lawyer Susan Necheles instructed CNN she met with New York prosecutors to argue why Trump shouldn’t be indicted and that prosecutors didn’t articulate the precise costs they’re contemplating.

Trump, in the meantime, took to his social media to foretell his impending indictment. In a put up attacking Bragg on March 18, Trump mentioned the “main Republican candidate and former president of the US can be arrested on Tuesday of subsequent week.”

“Protest, take our nation again,” Trump added, echoing the calls he made whereas he tried to overturn the 2020 election.

Trump’s prediction would grow to be untimely.

Advertisement

Trump’s name for protests after a possible indictment led to conferences between senior employees members from the district lawyer’s workplace, the New York Police Division and the New York State Courtroom Officers – who present safety on the prison courtroom constructing in decrease Manhattan.

Trump’s legal professionals additionally made a last-ditch effort to fend off an indictment. On the behest of Trump’s workforce, Costello, who suggested Cohen in 2018, supplied emails and testified to the grand jury on Monday, March 20, alleging that Cohen had mentioned in 2018 that he had selected his personal to make the cost to Daniels.

Costello’s testimony appeared to delay a potential indictment – for a short time at the very least.

Through the void, Trump continued to launch verbal insults in opposition to Bragg, calling him a “degenerate psychopath.” And 4 Republican chairmen of essentially the most highly effective Home committees wrote to Bragg asking him to testify, which Bragg’s workplace mentioned was unprecedented interference in a neighborhood investigation. An envelope containing a suspicious white powder and a demise menace to Bragg was to delivered to the constructing the place the grand jury meets – the powder was deemed nonhazardous.

The grand jury wouldn’t meet once more till Monday, March 27, when Pecker was ushered again to the grand jury in a authorities car with tinted home windows in a failed effort to evade detection by the media camped exterior of the constructing the place the grand jury meets.

Advertisement

Pecker, a longtime good friend of Trump’s who had a historical past of orchestrating so-called “catch and kill” offers whereas on the Nationwide Enquirer, was concerned with the Daniels’ deal from the start.

Two days after Pecker’s testimony, there have been a number of studies that the grand jury was going right into a pre-planned break in April. The grand jury was set to fulfill Thursday nevertheless it was not anticipated to listen to the Trump case.

As a substitute, the grand jury heard from one final witness within the Trump case on Thursday, whose id continues to be unknown. After which the grand jury shook up the American political system by voting to indict a former president and 2024 candidate for the White Home.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Published

on

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Even as the Trump administration continues to slash federal jobs, a number of federal agencies have begun to reverse course — reinstating some workers and pausing plans to dismiss others, sometimes within days of the firings.

Advertisement

Note: Some dates on the chart are approximate, based on available information.

The Office of Personnel Management on Tuesday revised earlier guidance calling for probationary workers to be terminated, adding a disclaimer that agencies would have the final authority over personnel actions. It is unclear how many more workers could be reinstated as a result.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at some of the back-and-forths so far:

Rehiring Some Essential Workers

Trump-appointed officials fired, then scrambled to rehire some employees in critical jobs in health and national security.

Advertisement

Workers reviewing food safety and medical devices

Advertisement

Around Feb. 15 The Food and Drug Administration fired about 700 probationary employees, many of whom were not paid through taxpayer money.

Advertisement

Workers involved in bird flu response

Advertisement
icon Around Feb. 14 The Department of Agriculture continued plans to fire thousands of employees, including hundreds in a plant and animal inspection program.
icon Days later The agency said it was trying to reverse the firings of some employees involved in responding to the nation’s growing bird flu outbreak.

Workers who maintain the U.S. nuclear arsenal

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Energy Department began laying off 1,000 of its probationary employees, including more than 300 who worked at the National Nuclear Security Administration, which maintains and secures the country’s nuclear warheads. A spokesperson for the Energy Department disputed that number, saying fewer than 50 at the N.N.S.A. were fired.

Rehired After Political Pushback

Advertisement

Public opposition from both Democrats and Republicans has also resulted in some fired workers getting called back.

Advertisement

Workers managing a 9/11 survivors’ health program

icon Around Feb. 15 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cut hundreds of employees, including 16 probationary workers who manage the World Trade Central Health Program, which administers aid to people who were exposed to hazards from the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
icon Several days later After bipartisan pushback, the Trump administration said that fired employees would return to their jobs.

Advertisement

Scientific researchers, including military veterans

Advertisement
icon Feb. 18 The National Science Foundation fired 168 employees, or roughly 10 percent of its work force.
icon Less than two weeks later The foundation began reversing dismissals of 84 probationary employees, in response to a ruling by a federal judge and guidance from the Office of Personnel Management to retain the employment of military veterans and military spouses.

Temporary Reinstatements and Pauses on Firings

The firing spree has prompted a slew of lawsuits, which in some cases have resulted in temporary reversals.

Advertisement

Employees at a federal financial watchdog

Advertisement
icon Feb. 11 Officials fired almost 200 employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial industry watchdog, and ordered the rest to stop their work.

Advertisement

Employees at an international aid department

icon A day later A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt the layoffs.
icon Two weeks later The judge ruled that the administration could proceed with plans to lay off or put on paid leave many agency employees. U.S.A.I.D. moved to fire around 2,000 U.S.-based workers and put up to thousands of foreign service officers and others on paid leave.

Workers from multiple agencies have also filed complaints with the office of a government watchdog lawyer who himself has been targeted by Mr. Trump for termination. In response to requests from that office, an independent federal worker board has considered some of the claims and temporarily reinstated some workers.

Advertisement

Workers at the Agriculture Department

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Agriculture Department began cutting thousands of jobs, including around 3,400 in the Forest Service.
icon Three weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a stay ordering the department to reinstate fired workers while an investigation continued.

Advertisement

Six workers from six federal agencies

Advertisement
icon Feb. 14 The Office of Personnel Management sent an email ordering federal agencies to fire tens of thousands of probationary employees.
icon Less than two weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board temporarily reinstated six fired federal workers from the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs, and the Office of Personnel Management.

The back-and-forth and lack of transparency surrounding the administration’s cost-cutting moves have deepened the confusion and alarm of workers across the federal government at large, many of whom also have to interpret confusing email guidance and gauge the veracity of various circulating rumors.

“The layoffs and then rehires undermine the productivity and confidence not only of the people who left and came back but of the people who stayed,” said Stephen Goldsmith, an urban policy professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a former mayor of Indianapolis.

Advertisement

Are you a federal worker? We want to hear from you.

The Times would like to hear about your experience as a federal worker under the second Trump administration. We may reach out about your submission, but we will not publish any part of your response without contacting you first.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Published

on

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

In his first address to Congress since beginning a tumultuous second term, US President Donald Trump proudly claimed on Tuesday night that he was “just getting started”. That is a bad omen for the world’s largest economy. The optimism among companies and investors that came with the businessman’s election victory is rapidly waning. After the president confirmed tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on Monday night, the S&P 500 initially erased all the gains it had made since the November polls. Consumer confidence has plunged. Manufacturers are reporting steep declines in new orders and employment, and bearish investor sentiment has shot well above its historic average.

Uncertainty is clouding the data and forecasts. Still, it is clear that the president has squandered what was a decent economic inheritance. Not long ago price pressures were fading, the US Federal Reserve was on the cusp of a steady rate-cutting cycle into a resilient economy, and the S&P 500 was gliding upwards. This is no longer true.

The depressing turnaround is a product of the administration’s pursuit of on-and-off import duties, and a chaotic policy agenda. The White House may believe it has a plan but America’s economic exceptionalism, from its relentless consumer spending and booming stock market to its reputation for dependable economic governance, is the collateral damage.

Advertisement

Personal expenditure — a bulwark of recent US growth — fell in January, by its most in nearly four years. With pandemic-era inflation not yet fully extinguished, and the reality of Trump’s price-raising tariff plans now dawning, consumers’ expectations for inflation in the year ahead have surged. The Fed has so far responded to forthcoming price pressures by putting rate cuts on hold, leaving borrowers facing a higher cost of credit. Elon Musk’s planned clear-out of public sector employees is also set to raise joblessness in an already cooling labour market.

Animal spirits are under pressure too. Perhaps naively, many businesses and investors expected import duties to be merely a negotiating tool. But Trump also believes tariffs are about “protecting American jobs”. After the latest salvo towards North American neighbours, the president offered a one-month reprieve for automakers on Wednesday, and was moving to broaden it on Thursday.

The unpredictability of tariff carve-outs, reversals and steps against other trading partners makes it impossible for businesses to plan. Retaliatory measures will also hurt exporters. The broader deluge of policy announcements — some of which have had significant geopolitical ramifications — adds to the decision-making paralysis facing boardrooms and traders.

Faith in US economic and financial institutions is also being tested. Trump has filled regulatory bodies with his chums. The Fed’s independence is an ongoing concern. Then there are zany economic ideas, from building a cryptocurrency reserve to a rumoured “Mar-a-Lago accord” to devalue the dollar. Some analysts note that the dollar’s recent weakness amid economic turmoil suggests financial markets may be beginning to question the safe haven status of the currency.

It is true that the administration’s tax cuts and deregulation efforts are yet to get started. But since they are likely to be paired with tariffs on more trading partners, rash policymaking and a clampdown on undocumented immigrants — which make up an estimated 5 per cent of workers — optimism around near-term US economic growth feels increasingly like blind hope. The contours of Trump’s economic agenda have sharpened. It is already worse than everyone thought, and he is just six weeks in.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Published

on

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Steve Carell attends the “Despicable Me 4” New York Premiere at Jazz at Lincoln Center in June.

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Steve Carell is making amends for a memorable but painful episode of The Office.

The Golden Globe-winning actor announced in a video posted on YouTube that the charity Alice’s Kids will cover the costs of prom tickets for hundreds of high school seniors in Altadena after a series of wildfires ravaged much of Los Angeles in January.

“Attention! Attention, all seniors,” Carell said in a video posted to the charity’s YouTube channel.

Advertisement

“Alice’s Kids wanted me to let you know that they will be paying for all of your prom tickets. And if you’ve already paid for your prom tickets, they will reimburse you for your prom tickets,” he said.

“It’s a pretty good deal,” he added.

YouTube

Advertisement

The Virginia-based children’s charity said that the prom promise will support approximately 800 students across six high schools, estimating the total cost to be around $175,000.

Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of Alice’s Kids, said Carell was asked to announce the pledge because so many young people binge-watched The Office during the pandemic.

“Steve has supported us for years. When I started talking to principals about paying for the tickets, someone at some point actually mentioned Steve’s name … and he told me that Steve was actually pretty popular with high schoolers because they ‘discovered’ The Office during COVID and they saw Despicable Me,” Fitzsimmons said in an email to NPR.

“So, I came up with the idea of having Steve announce our gesture, and he agreed immediately to cut the video.”

Carell’s promotion of this charitable act calls to mind one of the most polarizing episodes of the beloved American series The Office.

Advertisement

In the season six episode “Scott’s Tots,” Carell’s character, Michael Scott, famously pledges to pay for a class of high school seniors’ college tuition, only to reveal that he lacks the funds to fulfill his promise.

In contrast, students need not worry in this real-world scenario, as Alice’s Kids is fully covering the costs.

Continue Reading

Trending