Connect with us

News

Inside the long and winding road to Trump’s historic indictment | CNN Politics

Published

on

Inside the long and winding road to Trump’s historic indictment | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

The New York grand jury listening to the case in opposition to Donald Trump was set to interrupt for a number of weeks. The previous president’s legal professionals believed on Wednesday afternoon they’d at the very least a small reprieve from a potential indictment. Trump praised the perceived delay.

Manhattan District Legal professional Alvin Bragg had different plans.

Thursday afternoon, Bragg requested the grand jury to return an historic indictment in opposition to Trump, the primary time {that a} present or former US president has been indicted. The shock transfer was the ultimate twist in an investigation that’s taken a protracted and winding street to the history-making costs that had been returned this week.

Advertisement

An indictment had been anticipated early final week – together with by Trump himself, who promoted a idea he could be “arrested” – as legislation enforcement businesses ready for the logistics of arraigning a former president. However after the testimony of Robert Costello – a lawyer who appeared on Trump’s behalf in search of to undercut the credibility of Trump’s former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen – Bragg appeared to hit the pause button.

Costello’s testimony brought on the district lawyer’s workplace to reassess whether or not Costello must be the final witness the grand jury heard earlier than prosecutors requested them to vote on an indictment, a number of sources instructed CNN.

In order that they waited. The subsequent day the grand jury was scheduled to fulfill, jurors had been instructed to not are available in. Bragg and his high prosecutors huddled the remainder of the week and over the weekend to find out a method that might successfully counter Costello’s testimony within the grand jury.

They referred to as two extra witnesses. David Pecker, the previous head of the corporate that publishes the Nationwide Enquirer, appeared on Monday. The opposite witness, who has nonetheless not been recognized, testified on Thursday for 35 minutes in entrance of the grand jury – simply earlier than prosecutors requested them to vote on the indictment of greater than 30 counts, the sources mentioned.

Trump and his attorneys, considering Bragg may be reconsidering a possible indictment, had been all caught off-guard, sources mentioned. A few of Trump’s advisers had even left Palm Seaside on Wednesday following information studies that the grand jury was taking a break, the sources added.

Advertisement

After the indictment, Trump ate dinner together with his spouse, Melania, Thursday night and smiled whereas he greeted friends at his Mar-a-Lago membership, in line with a supply conversant in the occasion.

The Manhattan district lawyer’s investigation into Trump has been ongoing for years, courting again to Bragg’s predecessor, Cy Vance. Its focus shifted by mid-2020 to the accuracy of the Trump Org.’s monetary statements. On the time, prosecutors debated authorized theories across the hush cash funds and thought they had been a protracted shot. At a number of factors, the wide-ranging investigation appeared to have been winding down – to the purpose that prosecutors resigned in protest final 12 months. One even wrote a e-book important of Bragg for not pursuing costs in opposition to Trump launched simply final month.

The particular costs in opposition to nonetheless Trump stay below seal and are anticipated to be unveiled Tuesday when Trump is ready to be arraigned.

There are questions swirling even amongst Trump critics over whether or not the Manhattan district lawyer’s case is the strongest in opposition to the previous president amid extra investigations in Washington, DC, and Georgia over each his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his dealing with of categorised paperwork at his Florida resort.

Trump may nonetheless face costs in these probes, too, that are separate from the New York indictment.

Advertisement

Nevertheless it’s the Manhattan indictment, courting again to a cost made earlier than the 2016 presidential election, that now sees Trump going through down prison costs for the primary time as he runs once more for the White Home in 2024.

It was simply weeks earlier than the 2016 election when Cohen, Trump’s then-lawyer, paid grownup movie actress Stormy Daniels $130,000 to maintain silent about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Cohen was later reimbursed $420,000 by the Trump Group to cowl the unique cost and tax liabilities and to reward him with a bonus.

That cost and reimbursement are keys at challenge within the investigation.

Cohen additionally helped prepare a $150,000 cost from the writer of the Nationwide Enquirer to Karen McDougal to kill her story claiming a 10-month affair with Trump. Trump additionally denies an affair with McDougal. Through the grand jury proceedings, the district lawyer’s workplace has requested questions concerning the “catch and kill” take care of McDougal.

When Cohen was charged by federal prosecutors in New York in 2018 and pleaded responsible, he mentioned he was appearing on the route of Trump when he made the cost.

Advertisement

On the time, federal prosecutors had decided they may not search to indict Trump within the scheme due to US Justice Division rules in opposition to charging a sitting president. In 2021, after Trump left the White Home, prosecutors within the Southern District of New York determined to not pursue a case in opposition to Trump, in line with a current e-book from CNN senior authorized analyst Elie Honig.

However then-Manhattan District Legal professional Vance’s workforce had already picked up the investigation into the hush cash funds and begun taking a look at potential state legislation violations. By summer season 2019, they despatched subpoenas to the Trump Org., different witnesses, and met with Cohen, who was serving a three-year jail sentence.

Vance’s investigation broadened to the Trump Org.’s funds. New York prosecutors went to the Supreme Courtroom twice to implement a subpoena for Trump’s tax information from his long-time accounting agency Mazars USA. The Trump Org. and its long-time chief monetary officer Allen Weisselberg had been indicted on tax fraud and different costs in June 2021 for allegedly operating an off-the-books compensation scheme for greater than a decade.

Weisselberg pleaded responsible to the fees final 12 months and is at the moment serving a five-month sentence at Rikers Island. Prosecutors had hoped to flip Weisselberg to cooperate in opposition to Trump, however he wouldn’t tie Trump to any wrongdoing.

Disagreements concerning the tempo of the investigation had brought on at the very least three profession prosecutors to maneuver off the investigation. They had been involved that the investigation was shifting too shortly, with out clear proof to help potential costs, CNN and others reported final 12 months.

Advertisement

Vance licensed the attorneys on the workforce to current proof to the grand jury close to the tip of 2021, however he didn’t search an indictment. These near Vance say he wished to depart the choice to Bragg, the newly elected district lawyer.

Bragg, a Democrat, took workplace in January 2022. Lower than two months into his tenure, two high prosecutors who had labored on the Trump case below Vance abruptly resigned amid a disagreement within the workplace over the power of the case in opposition to Trump.

On February 22, 2022, Bragg knowledgeable the prosecution workforce that he was not ready to authorize costs in opposition to Trump, CNN reported. The prosecutors, Carey Dunne and Mark Pomerantz, resigned the subsequent day.

In his resignation letter, Pomerantz mentioned he believed Trump was responsible of quite a few felonies and mentioned that Bragg’s resolution to not transfer ahead with an indictment on the time was “mistaken” and a “grave failure of justice.”

“I and others consider that your resolution to not authorize prosecution now will doom any future prospects that Mr. Trump can be prosecuted for the prison conduct we now have been investigating,” Pomerantz wrote within the letter, which was reviewed by CNN.

Advertisement

At that time, the investigation was targeted on Trump’s monetary statements and whether or not he knowingly misled lenders, insurers, and others by offering them false or deceptive details about the worth of his properties.

Prosecutors had been constructing a wide-ranging falsified enterprise information case to incorporate years of monetary statements and the hush cash funds, individuals with direct information of the investigation instructed CNN. However on the time, these prosecutors believed there was a superb likelihood a felony cost associated to the hush cash cost could be dismissed by a decide as a result of it was a novel authorized idea.

Dunne and Pomerantz pushed to hunt an indictment of Trump tied to the sweeping falsified enterprise information case, however others, together with some profession prosecutors, had been skeptical that they may win a conviction at trial, partly due to the issue in proving Trump’s prison intent.

Regardless of the resignations of the prosecutors on the Trump case, Bragg’s workplace reiterated on the time that the investigation was ongoing.

“Investigations will not be linear so we’re following the leads in entrance of us. That’s what we’re doing,” Bragg instructed CNN in April 2022. “The investigation could be very a lot ongoing.”

Advertisement

On the identical time that Bragg’s prison investigation into Trump lingered final 12 months, one other prosecution in opposition to the Trump Org. moved ahead. In December, two Trump Org. entities had been convicted at trial on 17 counts and had been ordered to pay $1.6 million, the utmost penalty, the next month.

Trump was not personally charged in that case. Nevertheless it appeared to embolden Bragg’s workforce to sharpen their focus again to Trump and the hush cash cost.

Cohen was introduced again in to fulfill with Manhattan prosecutors. Cohen had beforehand met with prosecutors within the district lawyer’s workplace 13 instances over the course of the investigation. However the January assembly was the primary in additional than a 12 months – and a transparent signal of the route prosecutors had been taking.

As investigators inched nearer to a charging resolution, Bragg was confronted with extra public stress to indict Trump: Pomerantz, the prosecutor who had resigned a 12 months prior, launched a e-book concerning the investigation that argued Trump must be charged and criticized Bragg for failing to take action.

“Each single member of the prosecution workforce thought that his guilt was established,” Pomerantz mentioned in a February interview on “CNN This Morning.”

Advertisement

Requested about Bragg’s hesitance, Pomerantz mentioned: “I can’t converse intimately about what went by his thoughts. I can surmise from what occurred on the time and statements that he’s made since that he had misgivings concerning the power of the case.”

Bragg responded in an announcement saying that extra work was wanted on the case. “Mr. Pomerantz’s aircraft wasn’t prepared for takeoff,” Bragg mentioned.

Prosecutors continued bringing in witnesses, together with Pecker, the previous head of American Media Inc., which publishes the Nationwide Enquirer. In February, Trump Org. controller Jeffrey McConney testified earlier than the grand jury. Members of Trump’s 2016 marketing campaign, together with Kellyanne Conway and Hope Hicks, additionally appeared. In March, Daniels met with prosecutors, her lawyer mentioned.

And Cohen, after his quite a few conferences with prosecutors, lastly testified earlier than the grand jury in March.

The second week of March, prosecutors gave the clearest signal thus far that the investigation was nearing its conclusion – they invited Trump to seem earlier than the grand jury.

Advertisement

Potential defendants in New York are required by legislation to be notified and invited to seem earlier than a grand jury weighing costs.

Behind the scenes, Trump lawyer Susan Necheles instructed CNN she met with New York prosecutors to argue why Trump shouldn’t be indicted and that prosecutors didn’t articulate the precise costs they’re contemplating.

Trump, in the meantime, took to his social media to foretell his impending indictment. In a put up attacking Bragg on March 18, Trump mentioned the “main Republican candidate and former president of the US can be arrested on Tuesday of subsequent week.”

“Protest, take our nation again,” Trump added, echoing the calls he made whereas he tried to overturn the 2020 election.

Trump’s prediction would grow to be untimely.

Advertisement

Trump’s name for protests after a possible indictment led to conferences between senior employees members from the district lawyer’s workplace, the New York Police Division and the New York State Courtroom Officers – who present safety on the prison courtroom constructing in decrease Manhattan.

Trump’s legal professionals additionally made a last-ditch effort to fend off an indictment. On the behest of Trump’s workforce, Costello, who suggested Cohen in 2018, supplied emails and testified to the grand jury on Monday, March 20, alleging that Cohen had mentioned in 2018 that he had selected his personal to make the cost to Daniels.

Costello’s testimony appeared to delay a potential indictment – for a short time at the very least.

Through the void, Trump continued to launch verbal insults in opposition to Bragg, calling him a “degenerate psychopath.” And 4 Republican chairmen of essentially the most highly effective Home committees wrote to Bragg asking him to testify, which Bragg’s workplace mentioned was unprecedented interference in a neighborhood investigation. An envelope containing a suspicious white powder and a demise menace to Bragg was to delivered to the constructing the place the grand jury meets – the powder was deemed nonhazardous.

The grand jury wouldn’t meet once more till Monday, March 27, when Pecker was ushered again to the grand jury in a authorities car with tinted home windows in a failed effort to evade detection by the media camped exterior of the constructing the place the grand jury meets.

Advertisement

Pecker, a longtime good friend of Trump’s who had a historical past of orchestrating so-called “catch and kill” offers whereas on the Nationwide Enquirer, was concerned with the Daniels’ deal from the start.

Two days after Pecker’s testimony, there have been a number of studies that the grand jury was going right into a pre-planned break in April. The grand jury was set to fulfill Thursday nevertheless it was not anticipated to listen to the Trump case.

As a substitute, the grand jury heard from one final witness within the Trump case on Thursday, whose id continues to be unknown. After which the grand jury shook up the American political system by voting to indict a former president and 2024 candidate for the White Home.

Advertisement

News

Corporate Japan’s $77bn in property gains offer target for activists

Published

on

Corporate Japan’s $77bn in property gains offer target for activists

Stay informed with free updates

Japanese companies outside the real estate sector generated more than $77bn in paper profits last year from their non-core property portfolios, increasing pressure on them as investors demand asset sales to unlock value. 

The paper profits were spread across more than 250 companies in industries ranging from food production and glass manufacturing to advertising and financial services — many of them businesses that built property empires in the 1980s and have never needed to sell them.

The calculation of their 2023 gains by analysts at Goldman Sachs has emerged ahead of the June annual meeting season — the 10-day stint at the end of next month during which more than 2,000 listed companies meet shareholders.

Advertisement

Legal and banking advisers said the season would probably generate more friction than previous years, in part because of pressure on companies from the Tokyo Stock Exchange to focus on capital efficiency and valuations.

The glut of unrealised property gains last year follows 10 years in which prices of Japanese commercial property and condominiums have risen, and where, unlike London, New York and Hong Kong, remote working has not taken hold and Tokyo office vacancies remain low post-pandemic.

Actual real estate companies, such as Mitsubishi Estate and Tokyo Tatemono, have performed strongly, with shares for the sector up more than 20 per cent since January.

But Goldman’s Japan equity strategist, Bruce Kirk, said companies were under pressure from shareholders to justify their non-core businesses, and the vast property portfolios looked anomalous. 

Bankers who have advised Japanese companies on dealing with activists said that where investors once saw the property portfolios as a peculiarity, their existence now painted a target on companies and made them vulnerable to shareholder campaigns.

Advertisement

Goldman’s report focused on about 250 companies in the Topix index that were not real estate specialists but had business segments operating their real estate assets. 

Accounting changes made in 2010 obliged companies to disclose the book value of properties held for investment or rental, along with an estimate of market value. The difference between those two figures produces an annual reckoning of unrealised gains or losses on the property, which in many cases is office space.

Between them, those companies declared $77bn of paper gains in 2023 — not far off the $89bn of paper gains declared by the Japanese real estate industry itself.

Recent high-profile activist fund engagements with Japanese companies, including Elliott Management’s tussle with Dai Nippon Printing, have focused on non-core property assets.

“The potential value unlock from undervalued non-core real estate provides investors with yet another pressure point to focus on during their discussions with Japanese corporate management,” said Kirk.

Advertisement

He added there was likely to be some debate around the definition of core versus non-core, and his screening of companies with large non-core real estate portfolios deliberately omitted Japan’s railway companies, which hold significant properties around their stations.

“The corporate governance momentum is definitely on the side of investors at the moment,” said Kirk. “This could encourage a lot more scrutiny of the reasons why non-real estate companies have such extensive portfolios of real estate assets during this year’s AGM season.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump's social media account shares a campaign video with a headline about a 'unified Reich'

Published

on

Trump's social media account shares a campaign video with a headline about a 'unified Reich'

NEW YORK (AP) — A video posted to Donald Trump’s account on his social media network Monday included references to a “unified Reich” among hypothetical news headlines if he wins the election in November.

The headline appears among messages flashing across the screen such as “Trump wins!!” and “Economy booms!” Other headlines appear to be references to World War I.

The word “Reich” is often largely associated with Nazi Germany’s Third Reich, though the references in the video Trump shared appear to be a reference to the formation of the modern pan-German nation, unifying smaller states into a single Reich, or empire, in 1871.

The 30-second video appeared on Trump’s account at a time when the presumptive Republican nominee for president, while seeking to portray President Joe Biden as soft on antisemitism, has himself repeatedly faced criticism for using language and rhetoric associated with Nazi Germany.

It was posted and shared on the former president’s Truth Social account while he was on a lunch break from his Manhattan hush money trial.

Advertisement

“This was not a campaign video, it was created by a random account online and reposted by a staffer who clearly did not see the word, while the President was in court,” Karoline Leavitt, the campaign press secretary, said in a statement.

Earlier this month, Trump said at a fundraiser that Biden is running a “Gestapo administration,” referring to the secret Nazi police force.

What to know about the 2024 Election

Trump previously used rhetoric echoing Adolf Hitler when he said immigrants entering the U.S. illegally are “poisoning the blood of our country,” and called his opponents “vermin.”

The former president has also drawn wide backlash for having dined with a Holocaust-denying white nationalist in 2022 and for downplaying the 2017 rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where white nationalists chanted “Jews will not replace us!”

Advertisement

At least one of the headlines flashing in the video appears to be text that is copied verbatim from a Wikipedia entry on World War I: “German industrial strength and production had significantly increased after 1871, driven by the creation of a unified Reich.”

In one image, the headlines “Border Is Closed” and “15 Million Illegal Aliens Deported” appear above smaller text with the start and end dates of World War I.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Democrat donors warn Joe Biden that stance on Gaza could threaten re-election

Published

on

Democrat donors warn Joe Biden that stance on Gaza could threaten re-election

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

A top donor to US President Joe Biden has called on him to halt arms shipments to Israel, warning that the “catastrophe” of the Israel-Hamas war has imperilled his re-election bid.

George Krupp, who expects to raise $2.5mn at a fundraiser he is co-hosting in Boston on Tuesday, urged Biden to take the issue “off the table” by suspending arms shipments to Israel. 

“I think this Israel thing has been a catastrophe for him,” Krupp told the Financial Times. “I absolutely think that Biden needs to suspend arms shipments both for humanitarian and political reasons.”

Advertisement

The president’s stance on the war has divided Democrats across religious and generational lines. He has strongly supported Israel’s right to defend itself in response to the October 7 Hamas attacks.

On Monday he described the International Criminal Court’s application for arrest warrants against Israeli leaders as “outrageous”, adding: “We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security.”

But there has been growing criticism within the party over his failure to rein in the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the death toll in its war against Hamas has soared to more than 34,000, according to Palestinian officials.

The president this month paused a shipment of bombs to Israel over Netanyahu’s refusal to rule out an invasion of the Gazan city of Rafah, but last week he approved a $1bn package of military aid to the country. In April the US vetoed of a Security Council resolution that would have granted a Palestinian state full membership of the UN.

There are fears that young voters opposed to Israel’s military offensive in Gaza could desert Biden over the issue, while pro-Israeli Democrats could turn to Donald Trump.

Advertisement

More than 100,000 Democrats — or 13 per cent of the total vote — in Michigan, which has a large Arab-American community, voted “uncommitted” in the March 15 Democratic presidential primary over Biden’s stance.

Krupp, who signed a letter in March along with dozens of other donors and activists expressing their concern about “the crisis in Gaza”, told the FT that Biden’s “equivocation” over the war is “hurting” his re-election campaign. He added that the president needs a clear “doctrine” that “gets Israel out of Gaza and lays out a path to a two state solution”.

Krupp’s comments came after Democratic mega donor Haim Saban criticised Biden’s decision to halt the heavy weapons shipment to Israel. 

“Bad, Bad, Bad, decision, on all levels, Pls reconsider,” Saban wrote in an email to White House senior officials last week. “There are more Jewish voters, who care about Israel, than Muslim voters that care about Hamas,” he added in comments that were criticised by the Council on American-Islamic Relations and other civil rights groups. A representative for Saban declined to comment.

Democrats hope the party will unite to prevent a Trump victory. They point out that the former president called for a ban on Muslim immigrants in 2015. Biden has also been far more successful at raising funds, attracting $66mn more than Trump by the end of March.

Advertisement

“Donald Trump’s actions against the Muslim community as president are abhorrent,” New York Governor Kathy Hochul told the FT. “I support the president, how he’s handling this . . . [Israel needs] to eradicate Hamas but we also need to make sure the loss of innocent lives is mitigated.”

Patricia Gordon, a board member of the liberal, pro-Israel group J Street, who has hosted a fundraiser with first lady Jill Biden, said she also supported Biden’s approach to Israel and was confident that he would prevail.

“The president will always defend Israel, but recently took the difficult step to prevent the misuse of American resources in an offensive way,” Gordon said.

But with opinion polls favouring Trump, Krupp and many Democrats fear that the Gaza war could tip the balance against the president.

“I think if the election were held today, I think he’d lose,” said Krupp.

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Jude Webber in Dublin

Continue Reading

Trending