Connect with us

News

In Hong Kong, memories of China’s Tiananmen Square massacre are being erased | CNN

Published

on

In Hong Kong, memories of China’s Tiananmen Square massacre are being erased | CNN

Editor’s Be aware: A model of this story appeared in CNN’s In the meantime in China e-newsletter, a three-times-a-week replace exploring what you have to know in regards to the nation’s rise and the way it impacts the world. Join right here.


Hong Kong
CNN
 — 

For many years it was an emblem of freedom on Chinese language managed soil: each June 4, come rain or shine, tens of hundreds of individuals would descend on Victoria Park in Hong Kong to commemorate the victims of the 1989 Tiananmen Sq. bloodbath.

The environment can be directly defiant and somber. Audio system would demand accountability from the Chinese language Communist Celebration for ordering the bloody navy crackdown that value the lives of tons of, if not hundreds, of unarmed pro-democracy protesters on that fateful day in Beijing greater than 30 years in the past.

In reminiscence of the useless, at 8 p.m. yearly the park would flip right into a sea of candles, held excessive by folks vowing by no means to neglect.

Advertisement

This yr, whether or not these candles mild up as soon as once more will provide a litmus check for Hong Kong, its freedoms and aspirations, and its relationships to each the remainder of China and the remainder of the world.

Authorities in mainland China have at all times carried out their finest to erase all reminiscence of the bloodbath: Censoring information stories, scrubbing all mentions from the web, arresting and chasing into exile the organizers of the protests, and preserving the kin of those that died below tight surveillance. Consequently, generations of mainland Chinese language have grown up with out information of the occasions of June 4.

However Hong Kong has at all times had the flexibility to recollect. Within the years instantly after the bloodbath, Hong Kong was nonetheless a British colony past the attain of China’s censors. And even after Britain handed sovereignty to China in 1997, the town loved a semi-autonomous standing that allowed the vigil to proceed.

Not too long ago although, the candles in Victoria Park have been dimmed. Authorities banned the vigil in 2020 and 2021 citing coronavirus well being restrictions – although many Hongkongers imagine that was simply an excuse to clamp down on exhibits of public dissent following pro-democracy protests that swept the town in 2019.

Advertisement

In 2020, regardless of the shortage of an organized vigil, hundreds of Hongkongers went to the park anyway in defiance of the authorities. However final yr, the federal government put greater than 3,000 riot police on standby to stop unauthorized gatherings – and the park remained in darkness for the primary time in additional than three many years.

With Hong Kong now easing lots of its Covid restrictions, all eyes might be on this yr’s “six 4” – because the date is understood domestically – as a barometer of not solely the political environment, however Hongkongers’ urge for food for defiance and the federal government’s tolerance of dissent.

For supporters of the vigil, the early indicators aren’t good.

Critics say Hong Kong has taken an authoritarian flip ever since its personal pro-democracy protests emerged. Certainly, its subsequent chief, simply weeks from energy, has been named as John Lee – who rose to prominence because the safety chief who helped to subdue these protests.

Many critics say the Hong Kong authorities can be stretching credulity if it once more bans the occasion on the grounds of Covid. But that seems to be what the outgoing Chief Govt Carrie Lam has urged. On the finish of Might, Lam gave an equivocal response when requested whether or not individuals who gathered at Victoria Park on June 4 would face authorized repercussions.

Advertisement

“So far as any gathering is anxious, there are a variety of authorized necessities,” Lam informed reporters. “There’s a nationwide safety regulation, there are the social-distancing restrictions, and there may be additionally a venue query… whether or not a selected exercise has obtained authorization to happen in a selected venue needs to be determined by the proprietor of the venue.”

Underlining the federal government’s opposition to the vigil, Hong Kong police on Thursday mentioned it had observed folks “selling, advocating and inciting others to take part in unauthorized meeting within the space of Victoria Park” on June 4 and suggested the general public to not attend. The police cited Covid measures and a public order ordinance and warned those that marketed or organized illegal assemblies could possibly be charged and jailed. There can be a “enough deployment” of cops within the space on that day, mentioned Senior Superintendent Liauw Ka Kei, who mentioned that the police haven’t obtained any purposes for public memorials.

Pro-democracy demonstrators surround a truck filled with Chinese soldiers on their way to Tiananmen Square, May 20, 1989.

Requested whether or not folks there could possibly be arrested for carrying flowers or carrying black, the colour of protest in Hong Kong, Liauw mentioned those that appeared to incite others to affix illegal assemblies can be stopped and searched, and reiterated unlawful meeting carries a five-year most jail time period, whereas these discovered responsible of incitement might obtain as much as 12-months.

The police will even goal on-line incitement to assemble, Liauw mentioned.

Whether or not residents will dare to name the federal government’s bluff and end up in Victoria Park anyway is but to be seen, however the nationwide safety laws cited by Lam is a potent deterrent. The Hong Kong Catholic diocese cited issues over the regulation when it introduced not too long ago that for the primary time in three many years its church buildings wouldn’t maintain their annual Tiananmen plenty.

Advertisement

It’s a sweeping piece of laws that was launched in Hong Kong by the central Chinese language authorities and got here into pressure on the finish of June 2020 – simply weeks after Hongkongers had defied the ban on the 2020 vigil.

The central and native governments mentioned the regulation was wanted to revive order to the town after the pro-democracy protests, which they claimed have been being fueled by international components. It outlaws acts of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with international forces; authorities proceed to insist it doesn’t infringe on freedoms of press or speech.

“Following the implementation of the nationwide safety regulation, chaos stopped and order has been restored in Hong Kong,” the Hong Kong authorities mentioned on Might 20.

People hold candles during a vigil in Hong Kong on June 4, 2018.

However, many Hongkongers say the regulation has extinguished their desires of a freer, extra democratic metropolis.

For the reason that regulation got here into impact, pro-democracy activists, former elected lawmakers and journalists have been arrested. Tens of hundreds of Hongkongers have left the town, some fleeing persecution and searching for asylum abroad.

Advertisement

The organizers of the Tiananmen vigil have disbanded and a few of them have been jailed. Amongst their alleged transgressions: performing as “international brokers” and urging folks to commemorate the anniversary of the bloodbath.

The fates of Tiananmen Sq. and Hong Kong have lengthy been intertwined.

Even earlier than the bloodbath, when scholar protesters in Beijing would use the sq. as a base to push for governmental reform and larger democracy, Hong Kong residents would maintain rallies in solidarity. Many would even journey to the Chinese language capital to supply help.

And when Beijing determined to ship in Folks’s Liberation Military troops armed with rifles and accompanied by tanks to forcibly clear the sq. of 1 such protest – that had attracted tens of hundreds of scholars – within the early hours of June 4, 1989, Hongkongers have been among the many first to supply help.

There isn’t a official demise toll for a way lots of the largely scholar protesters have been killed that day, however estimates vary from a number of hundred to hundreds, with many extra injured. It has additionally been estimated that as many as 10,000 folks have been arrested throughout and after the protests. A number of dozen protesters have been executed.

Advertisement
A lone man with shopping bags temporarily stops the advance of Chinese tanks after the bloody crackdown against protesters, Beijing,  June 5, 1989.

Of those that escaped, some 500 have been saved by an underground community dubbed “Operation Yellow Chicken,” which helped smuggle the organizers and others vulnerable to arrest into Hong Kong, nonetheless a British territory on the time.

The next yr the Hong Kong Alliance in Help of Patriotic Democratic Actions of China started organizing the annual vigil in Victoria Park, and regardless of fears that Beijing would possibly clamp down on the occasion following the 1997 handover of sovereignty, it continued to flourish lengthy after Hong Kong’s new incarnation as a Particular Administrative Area of China.

The final time the vigil was held, in 2019, greater than 180,000 folks attended, in response to organizer estimates.

Since that final vigil, there have been many symbolic erasures of the town’s means to publicly keep in mind, protest and mourn the bloodbath.

In September 2021, the Hong Kong Alliance – the organizer of the vigil – determined to disband, citing the nationwide safety regulation.

Advertisement

A number of of its members have been charged with subversion below the safety regulation and a few of its core figures, together with former lawmakers, have been given jail sentences over fees of unauthorized meeting.

Thousands of Hong Kongers gather in the city's Victoria Park to mark the 31st anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown, 2020.

After asserting the group’s dissolution, Richard Tsoi, a former vice-chairman of the alliance, mentioned: “I do imagine that Hong Kong folks – irrespective of in particular person capability or different capability – will proceed to commemorate June 4 as earlier than.”

But since Tsoi spoke, extra reminders of what occurred on June 4, 1989, have slipped from sight.

Final December Hong Kong College eliminated its “Pillar of Disgrace,” an iconic sculpture commemorating the Tiananmen victims, which had stood on its campus for greater than 20 years. A number of different native universities have additionally taken down memorials.

Two children look at the

In April, a controversial Tiananmen portray was amongst a number of works containing political content material faraway from Hong Kong’s main new artwork museum M+, although the establishment mentioned the removing was a part of a routine “rotation” of exhibited artwork.

Advertisement

And the Catholic diocese’s resolution to not mark the date got here simply weeks after 90-year-old Cardinal Joseph Zen, one in every of Asia’s most senior Catholic clerics and an outspoken critic of China’s Communist Celebration, was arrested together with three different pro-democracy activists.

Nonetheless, there are those that say they may proceed to talk out in no matter methods they’ll to maintain alive the reminiscence of Tiananmen.

After former Hong Kong Alliance chief Chow Hold-tung was arrested final yr, she delivered an impassioned protection in courtroom, condemning what she mentioned was “one step within the systemic erasure of historical past, each of the Tiananmen bloodbath and Hong Kong’s personal historical past of civic resistance.”

Even because the courtroom ready handy down a 15-month sentence, she remained defiant. “It doesn’t matter what the penalty is, I’ll proceed to talk what I need to,” she mentioned in feedback posted on-line this January.

“Even when candlelight is criminalized, I’ll nonetheless name on folks to make a stand, whether or not on June 4 this yr or each June 4 in years to return.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Netflix hopes Mike Tyson-Jake Paul fight will deliver a streaming knockout

Published

on

Netflix hopes Mike Tyson-Jake Paul fight will deliver a streaming knockout

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Mike Tyson, left, and Jake Paul faced off in the live bout on FridayNetflix’s push into streaming live events was put to its biggest test on Friday with the boxing match-up between former heavyweight champion Mike Tyson and Jake Paul, a YouTube influencer who became a professional fighter in 2020.

The bout, which was won by Paul, 27, who beat Tyson, 58, on points, was available to all of Netflix’s 280mn subscribers at no extra charge, a departure from the expensive pay-per-view or premium TV packages that have long been associated with professional boxing. 

Boxing used to be a lucrative business for the pay-TV networks HBO and Showtime, but both exited the sport as its popularity declined. 

Advertisement

For Netflix, the Tyson-Paul bout was aimed at attracting new subscribers — particularly to its advertising-supported service, analysts say. The company’s ad tier, launched in late 2022, has about 70mn subscribers. 

The boxing “megaevent . . . should boost audience engagement and attract advertising-tier subscribers, viewers and dollars”, analysts at JPMorgan said.  

On social media, some fans complained about buffering problems during the fight. The website Down Detector reported that more than 84,000 viewers reported problems.

The unusual bout featuring Tyson, the fiercest and most controversial boxer of his generation, and Paul, a brash social media star, appeared to be part of a strategy to target younger male viewers. In January, Netflix signed a $5bn, 10-year deal with World Wrestling Entertainment’s weekly Raw programme in the US, by far the group’s biggest foray into streaming live events. 

Netflix has had success with what it calls “sports-adjacent” programming, including documentaries such as Formula 1: Drive to Survive and Beckham. But it is starting to feature more live sporting events, including a planned National Football League game on Christmas Day — prompting speculation on Wall Street that it plans to eventually secure a rights deal with a major sports league.

Advertisement

Ted Sarandos, co-chief executive, has tried to damp the speculation, saying Netflix does not want to enter a typical sports rights deal in which most of the financial benefit goes to a league.  

“Where we can really differentiate and outcompete everybody is in the storytelling of sports, the drama of sports,” Sarandos said on an earnings call earlier this year. 

Netflix’s position contrasts with its streaming rivals, including Amazon Prime, Apple TV and Google’s YouTube, which gobbled up sports professional sports rights — Amazon has NFL’s Thursday Night Football, Apple hosts Major League Baseball’s Friday Night Baseball and YouTube is the home of the NFL’s Sunday Ticket roster of games. But analysts at Morgan Stanley have said they expect Netflix to eventually enter the competition for sports rights as traditional TV networks decline and existing deals with major US sports leagues expire by 2030. 

Netflix began experimenting with live programming last year with a comedy special by Chris Rock, which faced technical problems. It has also live-streamed the SAG awards and a “roast” of retired American football star Tom Brady.  

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump defense pick Hegseth accused of 2017 sexual assault

Published

on

Trump defense pick Hegseth accused of 2017 sexual assault

One of Donald Trump’s most controversial cabinet picks just became even more so: Pete Hegseth, tapped for defense secretary earlier this week, was accused of sexual assault in 2017, according to police.

No charges were filed in the case, but shocked Trump transition team officials are nonetheless reportedly weighing next steps for the Fox News host, whose nomination took many in Washington by surprise.

President-elect Trump nominated the 44-year-old National Guard veteran on Tuesday to run the world’s most powerful military, despite having never managed a large organization.

Police in Monterey, California confirmed Thursday that they had investigated “an alleged sexual assault” at a hotel involving Hegseth that included bruising to the victim’s right thigh, in early October 2017.

News of the woman’s accusations caught the Trump team off guard, according to Vanity Fair, which first reported the story.

Advertisement

Hegseth’s lawyer Timothy Parlatore told the publication that the allegation “was already investigated by the Monterey police department and they found no evidence for it.”

And Trump’s communications director Steven Cheung said that Hegseth “has vigorously denied any and all accusations, and no charges were filed.

“We look forward to his confirmation as United States Secretary of Defense so he can get started on Day One to Make America Safe and Great Again,” Cheung said.

Hegseth’s hearing in the Senate is likely to be among the more fraught, not only due to his lack of experience but also other controversies, such as his lobbying of Trump during his first term to pardon service members accused of war crimes.

Hegseth joined Fox News as a contributor in 2014 and now co-hosts “Fox and Friends Weekend” and serves as a host for “Fox Nation.”

Advertisement

He additionally served as an infantry officer in the National Guard, deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan.

The accusations against Hegseth come as Trump’s pick for attorney general, far-right former congressman Matt Gaetz, stunned many following his lengthy embroilment in sexual misconduct allegations.

And Trump himself was convicted of financial wrongdoing for covering up payments to a former porn star and found liable for defaming and sexually abusing an author.

Hegseth has been married three times, divorcing his first wife in 2009 following an “irretrievable breakdown” and “infidelity,” according to the Washington Post.

His second wife filed for divorce in September 2017, one month after he had a baby with a Fox News producer whom he subsequently married, according to US media.

Advertisement

bfm/jgc

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump’s cabinet picks: key players in the president-elect’s administration

Published

on

Donald Trump’s cabinet picks: key players in the president-elect’s administration

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump has moved quickly to name candidates for the top jobs in his incoming administration. The picks show that loyalty appears to have been a crucial criteria for a post — and in many cases, the president-elect’s picks have shocked Washington’s political establishment.

Many of the nominees could face gruelling Senate confirmation hearings in the new year before they are confirmed, but here is a handy guide to those likely to be among the most powerful players in the second Trump White House.

Marco Rubio

Secretary of state

Florida senator Marco Rubio, 53, is set to become America’s chief diplomat in Trump’s second administration. Rubio, a former political rival to Trump, is known for his hawkish views on China and Iran — and is not as isolationist as some other Trump allies.

Advertisement

Pete Hegseth

Secretary of defence
Pete Hegseth

Pete Hegseth is a 44-year-old army veteran and Fox News host with no government experience who has been asked to lead an organisation with almost 3mn military and civilian employees. Hegseth’s views of the US military align with Trump’s instincts, including rooting out “socially correct garbage”.

Susie Wiles

White House chief of staff
Susie Wiles

Trump’s first decision after winning the 2024 presidential election was to pick his campaign manager, Susie Wiles, as chief of staff. Wiles, 67, is a seasoned Republican campaign operative who has established herself inside Trump’s orbit, in part by keeping the public spotlight on others.

John Ratcliffe

CIA director
John Ratcliffe

John Ratcliffe, 59, director of national intelligence in the final year of Trump’s first term, is a staunch ally who sharply criticised special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election when he was a congressman.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy

Government efficiency
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy

Elon Musk, 53, and Vivek Ramaswamy, 39, are being put in charge of a promised effort to slash rules, bureaucracy and spending throughout government. They will lead a yet to be established “department of government efficiency”.

Mike Waltz

National security adviser
Mike Waltz

Mike Waltz, 50, is a decorated military veteran, Nato critic and China sceptic. The Florida congressman and retired Army Special Forces officer has called China an “existential” threat. He served several tours in Afghanistan, the Middle East and Africa.

Kristi Noem

Homeland security secretary
Kristi Noem

Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem, 52, has been nominated to lead the Department of Homeland Security with a mandate to stem immigration. Her autobiography, which recounted how she shot her puppy Cricket for misbehaviour, became a national talking point earlier this year.

Tom Homan

Border tsar
Tom Homan

Tom Homan, 62, previously served as Trump’s immigration and customs enforcement director, backing the policy of separating parents from their children to discourage irregular migration. He has been asked to crack down on undocumented immigrants crossing the US-Mexico border and deport those already in the US.

Elise Stefanik

US ambassador to UN

Republican New York congresswoman Elise Stefanik, 40, is a former White House aide to George W Bush who rose to prominence for questioning the presidents of Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania about antisemitism on their campuses, leading to their resignations.

Mike Huckabee

US ambassador to Israel
Mike Huckabee

Mike Huckabee, 69, is the former governor of Arkansas and a prominent evangelical Christian. He is adored by the Israeli right for unflinching support of Israel’s military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon, and his support for their desire to annex the occupied West Bank.

Stephen Miller

Deputy chief of staff for policy
Stephen Miller

Stephen Miller is among the most vocal and influential immigration hawks in Trump’s inner circle. The appointment of the 39-year-old will put the conservative firebrand and longtime adviser at the heart of the president-elect’s effort to reduce illegal immigration.

Tulsi Gabbard

Director of national intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard

The former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii is known for her pro-Russian views, including blaming Nato and President Joe Biden’s administration for Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Tulsi Gabbard, 43, ran for president in 2020 from the far left of the Democratic party but has since embraced Trump and the Republicans.

Matt Gaetz

Attorney-general
Matt Gaetz,

The nomination of Republican congressman Matt Gaetz, 42, to run the Department of Justice has stunned Washington. Gaetz, a loyal Trump backer, was previously under investigation by the House of Representatives for alleged ethics breaches. Trump wants him to overhaul the department in retaliation for criminal investigations launched against the president-elect.

Robert F Kennedy Jr

Health secretary
Robert F Kennedy Jr,

Robert F Kennedy Jr, known as RFK, dropped his independent presidential campaign in August and backed Trump despite coming from the Democratic dynasty. Trump said he would allow 70-year-old Kennedy, a vocal vaccine sceptic and critic of the pharmaceutical industry, to “go wild” in reforming the US health and food system.

Reporting by Alex Rogers, Lauren Fedor, Oliver Barnes and Sophie Spiegelberger

Continue Reading

Trending