Connect with us

News

How businesses are using designated areas to help lactating mothers

Published

on

How businesses are using designated areas to help lactating mothers

Interior of a free-standing lactation pod

Mamava


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Mamava


Interior of a free-standing lactation pod

Mamava

When Johnathan Fowler had his first child in 2014, it was the first time he realized how hard it can be for new parents to breastfeed.

“I was completely uneducated,” Fowler told Morning Edition’s Michel Martin.

Advertisement

Fowler remembers his wife nursing in her office when she went back to work after having their first child. Sometimes she’d use the bathroom to get some privacy. That’s when Fowler decided his a car dealership with locations in Oklahoma and Colorado, would offer employees a different experience.

“I think the personal became the passionate for me,” Fowler said.

Fowler installed eight designated lactation spaces in 2021 for his employees and customers to use — two years before a new law that makes designated breastfeeding stations available across American workplaces.

The PUMP Act, which went into effect April 28th, expands protections for people who chose to breastfeed. The bipartisan law passed in December as part of the omnibus bill. Previously, the 2010 Break Time for Nursing Mothers Act required businesses to provide a designated area and break times for hourly workers to nurse. The new law extends these protections to salaried workers, like nurses and teachers. It also allows workers to sue their employers if they do not abide by this rule.

The Center for American Progress estimates that this act will expand breastfeeding protections to an additional nine million women in the United States.

Advertisement

A Fowler Automotive employee standing next to one of eight the lactation pods Jonathan Fowler purchased.

Mamava


hide caption

toggle caption

Mamava

Advertisement


A Fowler Automotive employee standing next to one of eight the lactation pods Jonathan Fowler purchased.

Mamava

“This normalizes that women and women’s bodies belong in all industries, and are worthy of respect,” said Liz Morris, deputy director at the Center For WorkLife Law. She helped draft the model legislation that the PUMP Act is based on.

The U.S. has no national policy requiring paid parental leave. Through the Family and Medical Leave Act, most parents are eligible for 12 weeks of unpaid leave. But since many can’t afford to go that long without income, some parents return to work while they are still nursing.

About 83% of parents start out breastfeeding their children after birth, according to 2019 data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.. By the time kids are three months old, 69% are breastfeeding, falling to 56% at six months.

Advertisement

Morris said parents are often forced to make tough choices: follow their healthcare provider’s recommendations for giving their baby human milk, or continue to work and earn an income.

“That is an impossible and inhumane choice that no person should have to make,” she said.

Sacha Mayer, the CEO of Mamava, which creates freestanding lactation pods for businesses and public spaces said that having a designated area prevents women from pumping in unsanitary areas, like she had to do when she was a young mother.

“The default was often in a restroom, Mayer told NPR. “And that was essentially making food for a human in a place that’s being used for the opposite.”

Mayer said having these designated areas can help new parents returning to work feel like their workplace understands their needs.

Advertisement

“When you are breastfeeding, it’s like an additional job,” Mayer said. “By having a space your employer is communicating that they support you that this part of your life is important.”

Exterior of a Mamava Pod

Mamava


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Mamava


Exterior of a Mamava Pod

Mamava

Businesses are not required by the PUMP Act to buy a lactation pod. They just have to designate an area for breastfeeding, which means an empty office or supply closet could be repurposed as a nursing area. There are no size or equipment requirements for the room.

For Fowler, a lactation-specific room was what he wanted for his staff but it came with a higher cost. These pods have surfaces made of non-toxic materials, so breast milk can’t be contaminated, benches and charging stations can cost anywhere between $10,000-25,000. Fowler paid for all eight lactation pods for his businesses without federal subsidies or support. The PUMP Act does not offer grants or tax write-offs for the costs of setting up a designated nursing area.

Advertisement

“I think that it’s important that the government is trying to incentivize small, locally owned businesses that maybe can’t afford these types of things, and try to help them be able to provide these opportunities,” Fowler said.

Amra Pasic edited the audio version of this story. Erika Aguilar edited the digital version.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Standard Chartered beats profit forecasts on back of higher interest rates

Published

on

Standard Chartered beats profit forecasts on back of higher interest rates

Standard Digital

Weekend Print + Standard Digital

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

Continue Reading

News

Trump faces prospect of additional sanctions in hush money trial as key witness resumes testimony

Published

on

Trump faces prospect of additional sanctions in hush money trial as key witness resumes testimony

NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump faces the prospect of additional sanctions in his hush money trial as he returns to court Thursday for another contempt hearing followed by testimony from a lawyer who represented two women who have said they had sexual encounters with the former president.

The testimony from attorney Keith Davidson is seen as a vital building block for the prosecution’s case that Trump and his allies schemed to bury unflattering stories in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. He is one of multiple key players expected to be called to the stand in advance of prosecutors’ star witness, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and personal fixer.

What to know about Trump’s hush money trial:

Prosecutors are seeking $1,000 fines for each of four comments by Trump that they say violated a judge’s gag order barring him from attacking witnesses, jurors and others closely connected to the case. Such a penalty would be on top of a $9,000 fine that Judge Juan M. Merchan imposed on Tuesday related to nine separate gag order violations that he found.

It was not immediately clear when Merchan might rule on the request for fresh sanctions, but the prospect of further punishment underscores the challenges Trump the presidential candidate is facing in adjusting to the role of criminal defendant subject to rigid courtroom protocol that he does not control. It also remains to be seen whether any rebuke from the court will lead Trump to adjust his behavior given the campaign trail benefit he believes he derives from painting the case as politically motivated.

Advertisement

During a one-day break from the trial on Wednesday, Trump kept up his condemnation of the case, though stopped short of comments that might run afoul of the gag order.

“There is no crime,” he told supporters in Waukesha, Wisconsin. “I have a crooked judge, is a totally conflicted judge.”

Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media outside the courtroom of his trial at Manhattan criminal court, Tuesday, April 30, 2024, in New York. (Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP)

Advertisement

The trial, now in its second week of testimony, has exposed the underbelly of tabloid journalism practices and the protections, for a price, afforded to Trump during his successful run for president in 2016.

The case concerns hush money paid to squelch embarrassing stories, including from a porn actor and a former Playboy model, and reimbursements by Trump that prosecutors say were intentionally fraudulent and designed to conceal the true purpose of the payments and to interfere in the election.

The former publisher of the National Enquirer, David Pecker, testified last week that he offered to be the “eyes and ears” of the Trump campaign and described in detail his role in purchasing a sordid tale from a New York City doorman that was later determined to not be true as well as accusations of an extramarital affair with former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

Advertisement
Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Freeland, Mich., Wednesday, May 1, 2024. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
FILE - Pedestrians walk past the Nasdaq building as the stock price of Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. is displayed on screens, March 26, 2024, in New York. A Delaware judge on Tuesday, April 30, granted a request by attorneys for Donald Trump and Trump Media & Technology Group, parent company of his Truth Social platform, to slow down a lawsuit filed by two cofounders of the company. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II, File)

The goal was to prevent the stories from getting out, a concern that was especially pointed in the aftermath of the disclosure of a 2005 “Access Hollywood” recording in which he was heard describing grabbing women without their permission.

A separate $130,000 payment was made by Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and personal fixer, to porn actor Stormy Daniels, to prevent her claims of a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump from surfacing.

Trump’s company then reimbursed Cohen and logged the payments to him as legal expenses, prosecutors have said in charging the former president with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records — a charge punishable by up to four years in prison.

Returning to the stand Thursday will be Keith Davidson, a lawyer who represented both Daniels and McDougal in their negotiations with the National Enquirer and Cohen.

Advertisement

He testified that he arranged a meeting at his Los Angeles office during the summer of 2016 to see whether the tabloid’s parent company American Media, Inc. was interested in McDougal’s story. At first, they demurred, saying she “lacked documentary evidence of the interaction,” Davidson testified.

Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media outside the courtroom of his trial at Manhattan criminal court, Tuesday, April 30, 2024, in New York. (Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP)

Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media outside the courtroom of his trial at Manhattan criminal court, Tuesday, April 30, 2024, in New York. (Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP)

But the tabloid at Pecker’s behest eventually bought the rights, and Davidson testified that he understood — and McDougal preferred — it would never be published. One reason for that, he said, is that there was an “unspoken affiliation” between Pecker and Trump and a desire by the company that owned the Enquirer to not publish stories that would hurt Trump.

Advertisement

The morning will begin with another gag order hearing. The four statements at issue were made by Trump before Merchan warned on Tuesday that additional violations could result in jail time.

They include comments to reporters and in interviews assailing Cohen’s integrity.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

UCLA cancels classes as clashes over Gaza war spread across US campuses

Published

on

UCLA cancels classes as clashes over Gaza war spread across US campuses

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

University campuses from New York to Los Angeles simmered with rage and recriminations on Wednesday as they dealt with the fallout from police operations to quash protests over the war in Gaza.

The University of California, Los Angeles cancelled classes for the day after a violent night-time attack by counter-protesters on an encampment set up by pro-Palestinian student demonstrators.

In New York, mayor Eric Adams blamed “outside agitators” for escalating anti-Israel demonstrations at Columbia University as he defended his police department’s conduct. New York police made 282 arrests at Columbia and further uptown at New York’s City College on Tuesday night.

Advertisement

Columbia said its exams and classes would be remote for the remainder of the academic year, with a police presence remaining on campus until May 17 — two days after graduation.

As the situation eased at Columbia and City College, a new encampment sprung up at Fordham University’s campus in midtown Manhattan, prompting further warnings of police action.

Pepper spray and fireworks were used during the clashes on UCLA’s campus, which began just before midnight. Police arrived in riot gear at about 1.40am but the clashes continued until about 3am.

LA mayor Karen Bass called for a full investigation into the “abhorrent and inexcusable” violence. “Those involved in launching fireworks at other people, spraying chemicals and physically assaulting others will be found, arrested and prosecuted, as well as anyone involved in any form of violence or lawlessness,” she said. “Free speech will be protected. Violence and bigotry will not.”

Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, criticised the response by the university and its security guards, saying “the limited and delayed campus law enforcement response at UCLA last night was unacceptable — and it demands answers”.

Advertisement

The Jewish Federation of Los Angeles called the attack by the counter-protesters “abhorrent”, saying they “do not represent the Jewish community or our values”. But it also criticised the UCLA administration and called for the immediate closure of encampments.

“People are sad and upset,” said one UCLA faculty member. “Everybody wants freedom of speech and the right to protest but it’s getting out of hand. It was a surprise to everybody that violence broke out.”

The clashes at UCLA came after two weeks of controversy at the nearby University of Southern California, where administrators cancelled the graduation speech by the valedictorian, Asna Tabassum, a Muslim woman, citing security concerns.

In New York, officers equipped in riot gear stormed the Columbia campus late on Tuesday in a dramatic raid to oust protesters from two encampments and Hamilton Hall, a building they had seized the previous night.

Adams told MSNBC: “Many people thought that this was just a natural evolution of a protest. It was not. These were professionals that were here and I just want to send a clear message out that there are people who are harmful and trying to radicalise our children and we cannot ignore these outside influences.”

Advertisement

The NYPD did not immediately release any details about the individuals involved, but Ben Chang, a Columbia spokesperson, echoed the mayor’s comments, saying the group that seized Hamilton Hall had been “led by individuals not affiliated with the university”.

Minouche Shafik, Columbia’s president, defended the decision to call in the police, writing to the university’s staff and students that protesters had “pushed the university to the brink” and her move came only after multiple attempts to de-escalate the situation through negotiations.

“Students and outside activists breaking Hamilton Hall doors, mistreating our public safety officers and maintenance staff, and damaging property are acts of destruction, not political speech,” she wrote on Wednesday. The university also said it was limiting access to campus, calling Hamilton Hall “an active crime scene”.

Protesters at Columbia had demanded the university divest from companies that profit from Israel and cut ties with an Israeli university. Many Jewish students complained vigorous activism had often boiled over into blatant antisemitism that would not have been tolerated by the administration if directed at other minority groups.

On Wednesday morning, the neighbourhood around the university was quiet after two weeks of drumbeating protests that prompted comparisons with the anti-Vietnam war demonstrations that rocked Columbia in 1968.

Advertisement

The only sign of the previous night’s raid was the military vehicle used by the police to breach the second floor of Hamilton Hall. It was parked across the street from the campus.

Inside the gates, Columbia’s main lawn appeared to have been cleared of the dozens of tents, draped in signs and banners, that formed the “Gaza solidarity encampment”.

A student who did not want to be named said he found the occupation of Hamilton Hall to be “disruptive” but the police response “disproportionately” large nonetheless. Another student said “it was about time” to clear the encampment and that Shafik could have acted earlier to prevent the protests from escalating.

In another sign that the stand-off had ended, Columbia’s student radio station, WKCR, which became a mainstay for its round-the-clock news coverage of the protest, switched back to jazz and classical music on Wednesday morning.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending