Connect with us

News

Firing of National Security Agency Chief Rattles Lawmakers

Published

on

Firing of National Security Agency Chief Rattles Lawmakers

As soon as word spread that President Trump had fired Gen. Timothy D. Haugh, the head of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command, current and former administration officials began floating theories about why he had been let go.

Had General Haugh opposed one of Mr. Trump’s initiatives, perhaps moved too slowly on purging officers who had worked on diversity issues? Or was he a casualty of the administration’s shifting priorities to counter narcotics?

Whether any of that was true, it had little, if anything, to do with why he was fired.

General Haugh was ousted because Laura Loomer, a far-right wing conspiracy theorist and Trump adviser, had accused him and his deputy of disloyalty, according to U.S. officials and Ms. Loomer’s social media post early Friday. He was one of several national security officials fired this past week on her advice.

“I predict you are going to see some nonsense statement about some policy difference or something General Haugh wasn’t doing, but we all know what happened,” said Senator Angus King, a Maine independent who is on the intelligence and armed services committees. “Laura Loomer said it. She is the one who told Trump to fire him.”

Advertisement

Senator Mitch McConnell, the Kentucky Republican and former majority leader, lamented that the Trump White House had ousted General Haugh and was appointing people to Pentagon posts who were skeptical of America’s engagement with allies and the world.

“If decades of experience in uniform isn’t enough to lead the N.S.A. but amateur isolationists can hold senior policy jobs at the Pentagon, then what exactly are the criteria for working on this administration’s national security staff?” Mr. McConnell said. “I can’t figure it out.”

The criteria Ms. Loomer appears to be using as she looks to oust people she sees as disloyal is their connections to critics of the Trump administration.

In her social media post, Ms. Loomer said General Haugh had been chosen by Gen. Mark Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, whom she called a traitor.

Ms. Loomer said General Haugh’s deputy at the National Security Agency, Wendy Noble, was close to James Clapper, a former director of national intelligence and fierce critic of Mr. Trump.

Advertisement

As chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Milley reviewed the appointments of hundreds of officers to key positions. Mr. Clapper, the longest-serving director of national intelligence in the Obama administration and a senior defense intelligence official under George W. Bush, has ties to officials throughout the spy agencies.

Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, said he had worked closely with General Haugh and never saw anything to suggest disloyalty or a lack of competence.

“I fear this is just the hourly installment in the Laura Loomer clown car aspect of this administration,” Mr. Himes said.

He said that it was important to have a detail-oriented leader at the top of the N.S.A., and that he was concerned General Haugh’s ouster could lead to policy changes.

Mr. Himes also said he was concerned that the Trump administration could try to split the jobs of N.S.A. director and head of Cyber Command.

Advertisement

Since U.S. Cyber Command was created, the director of the National Security Agency has led that organization. Some within the Trump administration, and veterans of his first term, want the two jobs separated. That would allow a military officer to lead Cyber Command but give the president or the defense secretary the license to name a civilian to lead the agency.

The two agencies work closely together, but have different roles. The National Security Agency penetrates telecom and computer networks overseas, collecting communications intercepts. Cyber Command conducts offensive and defensive operations on computer networks overseas. The command helps allied countries defend their networks and hunts for malware and breaches by Russia and other adversaries.

It also conducts offensive operations against the networks of adversaries to disrupt their ability to attack the United States.

A succession of N.S.A. directors have argued that one military officer should lead both agencies to improve coordination. But some Trump administration officials believe that it is important to have a civilian in charge one of the most important spy agencies.

Some Trump administration officials have been critical of the N.S.A.’s broad power to intercept phone calls overseas, because some Americans have been caught up in those efforts.

Advertisement

Mr. Himes said he opposed splitting the jobs. While there is an argument for separating them if done carefully, Mr. Himes said he doubted the Trump administration would proceed in such a manner. The administration was already imposing irrational cuts on the N.S.A. that were costing the agency skilled people, he said.

“Given this administration’s break-it-first-then-fix-it style of operating, I am concerned,” Mr. Himes said. “It is not the low performers or obsolete skill sets that are being fired. In many cases it is some of our most valuable people. And this very directly makes us less safe.”

Beyond the structure of the commands, some Trump administration officials want the N.S.A. to move faster on White House initiatives.

But Mr. Himes said there was no evidence the N.S.A. was slow rolling administration priorities, and he added that General Haugh was working to step up collection on drug cartels.

“I can say with certainty that the N.S.A. was reorienting its priorities,” Mr. Himes said. “In fact in some ways they were shifting in ways that made me a little concerned that the pivot to Asia and counterterrorism collection would get short-shrifted.”

Advertisement

Mr. King said it was deeply dangerous to remove General Haugh at a time when Chinese intelligence agencies were penetrating telecom networks and ransomware attacks backed by Russia on hospitals were continuing.

“Our country is under attack right now in cyberspace, and the president has just removed our top general from the field for no reason at the recommendation of someone who knows nothing about national security or even the job this general does,” Mr. King said.

News

End of The Line: how Saudi Arabia’s Neom dream unravelled

Published

on

End of The Line: how Saudi Arabia’s Neom dream unravelled

Executives raised myriad questions with management. From the outset, “we did a fair amount of warnings to make sure that the leadership, especially at the board level, were aware of these risks”, said the senior executive.

Where would the 9mn people due to populate The Line come from? How quickly could they be reasonably expected to arrive? Could construction and manufacturing start quickly enough? Would the levels of imports required overheat the economy? What if oil prices sank, drying up Saudi Arabia’s key source of revenue? What if the necessary materials could not be found? And did the Gulf nation really have the scientific and technical expertise to execute such a vast scheme?

Yet the pressure to deliver was relentless. The board expected the chief executive to “move things very quickly”, said the senior executive. “Dates had been given to the crown prince about what was achievable, but without the detail of knowing how it could be done,” said the senior design manager. When those dates were made public, there would be a loss of face if they weren’t met. “That’s where tensions grew.”

Staff were “being put into a position of effectively having to lie about the timescales and the cost of delivering the vision”, they added.

What remains

Advertisement

The Line — or at least its beginnings — can already be seen from space. Satellite imagery shows excavation and tunnelling work for the railway system, the “spine” connecting The Line to Neom International Airport, stretching for 150km — from the coast into the Hejaz mountains.

In a valley between two mountain ranges, levelling work is evident for the airport and its runways. “In true Neom fashion, there’s a mountain at the end of the runway that had to be blown up,” said the senior architect. Construction work has now stopped on both the spine and the airport. No new target for the airport has been set.

Construction of a water pipeline near The Line is shown in an August 2025 video © AL_khaldi_SA/X
Advertisement

The foundations for The Line’s first modules — perhaps the largest piles ever laid by man — are also visible, waiting to support the world’s largest occupied building, if it ever arrives. The village of Qayal, which was a few kilometres from the “hidden marina”, has been razed. Fifteen members of the Huwaitat tribe who protested against their eviction were sent to prison, some for up to 50 years, and three others were sentenced to death, according to human rights observers.

Construction of a water pipeline near The Line is shown in an August 2025 video © AL_khaldi_SA/X

At the marina, excavations by late last year had dug out 100mn cubic metres of soil, the equivalent of 40 Great Pyramids of Giza. Ships will access it via a canal leading more than a kilometre inland from the coast.

The chandelier, the upside-down office building hanging from the giant arch above the marina, remains in the plans. But Neom no longer intends to base its headquarters there. Neom’s deputy chief executive Rayan Fayez acknowledged last month that the project’s budget “evolves every day”, adding that it was a good point to “reassess what worked and what hasn’t worked”.

Advertisement

With the goal now to build just three of the 20 modules originally planned, the ambition for The Line’s first phase is a faint echo of what it once was. One person familiar with the project said work had effectively stopped, with efforts now focused on completing a few small buildings around the marina. Some of the earlier piling work has been covered with sand.

“I think as a thought experiment, great,” said one urban planning expert who works in Saudi Arabia. “But don’t build thought experiments.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump urges GOP to end shutdown. And, SCOTUS skeptical of reasoning behind tariffs

Published

on

Trump urges GOP to end shutdown. And, SCOTUS skeptical of reasoning behind tariffs

Good morning. You’re reading the Up First newsletter. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to the Up First podcast for all the news you need to start your day.

Today’s top stories

The government shutdown is now in its 37th day, and President Trump has been urging Republicans to end it by eliminating the Senate filibuster. Earlier this week, some Democrats expressed their interest in finding a way to resolve the shutdown, but their victories at the ballot box on Tuesday have emboldened many to hold firm. Meanwhile, the president acknowledged that the shutdown hurt Republicans on election night.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a news conference on Nov. 5, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. The record for the longest shutdown in the U.S. Government was broken on Wednesday as it entered its 36th day.

Tom Brenner/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Tom Brenner/Getty Images

  • 🎧 Most Republicans are not in favor of ditching the filibuster, as Trump has sought, but some bipartisan talks appear to have picked up steam this week, NPR’s Sam Gringlas tells Up First. The solution that Senate Democrats and Republicans could be discussing is a short-term funding measure until December or later, along with votes on a small package of regular appropriations bills. Republicans would need eight Democrats to sign onto a deal to reopen the government. However, the expiring health care subsidies remain a sticking point during these talks.

The Supreme Court has heard arguments in a case about Trump’s tariffs, but has not yet issued a major ruling. Trump utilized a 1977 law, known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, to impose the tariffs. The central question of the case is whether the law gives the president the authority to impose tariffs on products from countries worldwide. The justices’ opinions are not yet known, but their questions yesterday indicate that they were skeptical of Trump’s position.

  • 🎧 If the court rules against Trump, the ultimate impact on tariffs is unclear. NPR’s Danielle Kurtzleben says the ruling would make a bunch of his tariffs illegal. Tariffs like the ones he’s imposed on goods like steel and aluminum, however, would remain in place. The president has stated that this is the most important Supreme Court case ever. If the high court ruled against the president, it would be the first time they have tried to rein in his power.

In Chicago this week, the Trump administration has been taken to court by city residents who oppose the aggressive immigration campaign there. Judge Sara Ellis has listened to hours of testimony from citizens’ accounts of jarring encounters with federal agents. Another judge, Robert Gettleman, presided over a hearing on Tuesday on the conditions inside an immigration holding facility in a Chicago suburb.

  • 🎧 Ellis is preparing to hand down her ruling today in the preliminary injunction, according to Jon Seidel with Chicago Public Media and the Chicago Sun-Times. It would essentially extend the order she issued last month, limiting the use of force by federal agents against protesters. During yesterday’s eight-hour hearing, Ellis heard from a woman who found herself staring down the barrel of a gun for filming the arrest of day laborers. She also listened to the video testimony of U.S. Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino, who stated that the use of force has been “more than exemplary.”

Deep dive

GettyImages-2228559366.png

Natalya Kosarevich/Getty Images

Advertisement

Tax season is approaching. The tax breaks extended under President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” primarily benefit high-net-worth individuals and high-income earners. While middle-income households may experience modest relief, the majority of benefits will be allocated to those with substantial earnings, investment income, or large estates. Here are some provisions in the bill that favor upper-income individuals and families:

  • 💰 Starting next year, Americans will have a permanent lifetime exemption for estate and gift taxes set at $15 million per individual and $30 million per married couple, up from $13.99 million and $27.98 million limits.
  • 💰 The exclusion for capital gains from sold qualified small business stock issued after July 4, 2025, has increased from $10 million to $15 million for companies with assets up to $75 million.
  • 💰 Bonus depreciation has been extended. This tax incentive enables businesses to immediately deduct 100% of the cost of qualifying assets, such as machinery and vehicles, rather than spreading the deduction over several years.

Read about three other tax changes that will benefit the wealthy here.

Today’s listen

Misty Copeland was the first Black female principal dancer in the history of American Ballet Theatre. She took a final bow at Lincoln Center on Oct. 22, 2025

Misty Copeland was the first Black female principal dancer in the history of American Ballet Theatre. She took a final bow at Lincoln Center on Oct. 22, 2025

Taylor Jewell/Invision/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Taylor Jewell/Invision/AP

Misty Copeland, who made history as the first Black woman to become a principal dancer at American Ballet Theatre, took her final bow last month. For Copeland, it had been over five years since she last performed on stage. To prepare for her farewell performance with ABT, she began getting her body back in shape a year ago. She says the performance was a way to express gratitude to the communities that supported her throughout her journey. At the end of her dance, Copeland was greeted with a 15-minute standing ovation. NPR’s Fresh Air caught up with Copeland to discuss the farewell show and what comes next for her. Listen to what she had to say or read highlights from the interview.

3 things to know before you go

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt takes questions from reporters during a press briefing at the White House in June 2025.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt takes questions from reporters during a press briefing at the White House in June 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Advertisement
  1. A federal judge has ordered the White House to immediately start providing American Sign Language interpretation at its briefings held by the press secretary or the president.
  2. In October, Johannesburg, South Africa, is bursting with violet Jacaranda blooms for the country’s spring season. This week, NPR’s Far-Flung Postcard series provides a peek at the beautiful plant.
  3. From whether brain rot is real to why female politicians might underperform in elections, check out these five recent economic papers that Planet Money says are worth examining.

This newsletter was edited by Yvonne Dennis.

Continue Reading

News

Read the Judge’s Order

Published

on

Read the Judge’s Order

Case: 1:25-cv-13323 Document #: 49 Filed: 11/05/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:838

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

)

PABLO MORENO GONZALEZ, FELIPE AGUSTIN ZAMACONA, and a class of similarly ) situated people,

V.

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 25 C 13323

KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of the U.S. Department ) of Homeland Security, in her official capacity; ) TODD LYONS, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration ) and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity; ) MARCOS CHARLES, Acting Executive Associate ) Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations, in his official capacity; SAMUEL OLSON, Interim Chicago Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity; ) GREGORY BOVINO, Commander-at-Large, U.S. ) Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ) ENFORCEMENT; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; and the DEPARTMENT) OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

)

)

)

Judge Robert W. Gettleman

Defendants.

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

This matter came before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order. On November 4, 2025, the court heard argument and considered the written filings by both sides, along with testimony presented by plaintiffs. Based on the record currently before it, the court finds that plaintiffs and members of the putative class have suffered, and are likely to suffer, irreparable harm absent the temporary relief granted herein, that they are likely to prevail on the merits of their claims, that the balance of the equities tips in their favor, and that the public

1

Continue Reading

Trending