Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

SF mom says legal aid helped keep her family housed, but budget cuts could eliminate program

Published

on

SF mom says legal aid helped keep her family housed, but budget cuts could eliminate program


A program offering free legal representation to low-income San Franciscans could soon fall victim to looming budget cuts and the city’s sluggish post-Covid economic recovery. 

Slow financial recovery post-Covid forces San Francisco to make deep cuts

As city department heads look to slash costs at the direction of Mayor Daniel Lurie, San Francisco’s General Civil Legal Services program has been flagged for potential elimination, according to a letter sent to legal aid groups from the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD).

“Due to budget constraints and funding reprioritization, MOHCD made the difficult decision to discontinue funding,” the letter noted.

A program offering free legal representation to low-income San Franciscans could soon fall victim to looming budget cuts and the city’s sluggish post-Covid economic recovery. NBC Bay Area’s Raj Mathai spoke with Investigative Reporter Bigad Shaban to understand the details.

Advertisement

The program, which served more than 2,600 people last year at a cost of $4.2 million, funds pro-bono legal representation for a wide range of issues in civil court, including family law, discrimination, and habitability complaints. Advocates say, in most cases, their clients would be unlikely to prevail on their own without the help of city-funded attorneys.

The city also pays for separate legal services programs focusing on eviction defense, gender-based violence, and immigration services. But so far, there’s no indication the existence of those programs will be impacted by the recommended cuts. Funding for General Legal Services funding is designed to offer free legal help for any issues that don’t fall within those three other specific categories.

Adrian Tirtanadi is the executive director and founder of Open Door Legal, which provides free legal representation to low-income families for a wide range of non-criminal issues, such as cases involving family law, discrimination, and habitability complaints.


This isn’t just cuts — this is the elimination of the entire program category.

Adrian Tirtanadi, founder and Executive Director of Open Door Legal

Advertisement

“This isn’t just cuts,” said Adrian Tirtanadi, the founder and Executive Director of Open Door Legal, one of 13 San Francisco legal aid nonprofits funded by the program. “This is the elimination of the entire program category.” 

Open Door Legal was among the groups who received the city’s letter announcing the proposed cuts due to “budget constraints and funding reprioritization.”

“The ramifications are catastrophic,” Tirtanadi said. “There will be nowhere for low-income people in San Francisco to get legal assistance on these matters.”

Sienna Dunn says if it wasn't for the free legal representation she received through San Francisco's Civil Legal Services Program, she and her two children would have been evicted from their long-time home in the city.

Sienna Dunn says if it wasn’t for the free legal representation she received through San Francisco’s Civil Legal Services Program, she and her two children would have been evicted from their long-time home in the city.

San Francisco native Sienna Dunn turned to Open Door Legal and the city’s Civil Legal Services program when her ex-partner stopped supporting her and her two children financially. The single mother was at risk of losing the apartment she’s lived in for more than two decades but says she “failed miserably” when she tried taking her financial fight to court by herself. 

Advertisement

“It’s extremely challenging for somebody who doesn’t have the legal background in order to understand all the pertinent information that’s needed in order for it to actually go before a judge,” said Dunn, a supervisor in the city’s transportation department. 

Once Open Door Legal intervened, however, Dunn said her attorney was able to get a judge to order monthly child support payments within just a few weeks of taking on the case. 

“I would have been evicted,” Dunn said. “I had paperwork that was in the process.”

City moves forward to eliminate program, but not yet a done deal

Tirtanadi is now trying to convince city officials that cutting the Civil Legal Services program will wind up costing the city a lot more in the long run if people like Dunn lose their homes over legal struggles they can’t overcome themselves.

The decision to cut the program will ultimately come down to whether Mayor Daniel Lurie follows the advice of his department when presenting his full city budget in June. 

Advertisement

As of now, Lurie said he hasn’t made any decisions.

“There are lots of recommendations out there right now and we are in the process of working with our department heads,” Lurie said. “This is an ongoing negotiation.”

San Francisco Supervisor Rafael Mandelman said the city’s budget predicament is forcing city leaders to make painful choices that will ultimately hurt San Franciscans. 

“We’re going to see many more cuts that should not be made and that we do not want to make,” Mandelman said. “We also have to balance our budget.”


We’re going to see many more cuts that should not be made and that we do not want to make.

Rafael Mandelman, president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors

Advertisement

Rafael Mandelman, president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, says a sluggish financial recovery will likely force the city to make deep budget cuts that "will hurt real San Franciscans."

Rafael Mandelman, president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, says a sluggish financial recovery will likely force the city to make deep budget cuts that “will hurt real San Franciscans.”

What pushed the city into these dire financial conditions?

The number of tourists visiting San Francisco last year was still down by about 3 million people compared to pre-Covid.  In addition, parts of downtown remain shuttered.

“You may recall there was a pandemic, and San Francisco has had among the slowest recoveries of any significant American city,” Mandelman explained.

Before the pandemic, San Francisco’s office vacancy rate was the lowest in the nation, at roughly 4 percent. Today, about 37 percent of office space remains empty.

The city is now projecting a budget shortfall in excess of $800 million over the next two years. 

Advertisement

While city leaders have tough choices ahead, it’s residents like Dunn who could feel the impact most directly. She hopes the reduction in city services won’t force native San Franciscans like her out of the city.

“Being a native of San Francisco is like finding a needle in a haystack these days,” Dunn said. “So, for people to be able to stay and raise a family here, I think it not only does the city a benefit, but it does the family one as well.”


Contact The Investigative Unit

submit tips | 1-888-996-TIPS | e-mail Bigad



Source link

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA

Retired San Francisco firefighter dies from lung cancer after Blue Shield denies treatment claims

Published

on

Retired San Francisco firefighter dies from lung cancer after Blue Shield denies treatment claims


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — The retired San Francisco firefighter at the center of a bitter insurance fight has lost his battle against cancer.

Ken Jones passed away Saturday, 14 months after being diagnosed with stage four lung cancer.

PREVIOUS REPORT: City asked to intervene after SF firefighter’s stage 4 lung cancer treatment denied by Blue Shield

We first told you about Jones in January — when the 17-year veteran and supporters asked the City Commission for help.

Advertisement

The Fire Department’s insurance carrier, Blue Shield, denied coverage for some of his recommended treatments.

Ken Jones was 70 years old.

SF firefighters rally for retiree denied cancer treatment by Blue Shield as more come forward

“After we got some publicity, thank you, a Blue Shield physician reached out to Ken’s physician, and they worked out a different plan that Blue Shield would cover. It’s still an incomplete plan,” said Helen Horvath, Jones’ wife when ABC7 Eyewitness News spoke to her in January, 2026.

Since then, Jones’ story has led to an investigation into other cases, with the city’s mayor vowing to support firefighters.

Advertisement

According to San Francisco’s Health Service Board, about 5,000 city employees and retirees are insured by Blue Shield. Now, city leaders are asking anyone who has been denied cancer treatment to speak up.

Tony Stefani with the Cancer Prevention Foundation said firefighters with a cancer diagnosis have a 14% higher chance of dying than other cancer patients in the general population.

“Current statistics tell us that 65% of the men and women in our profession are going to contract some form of cancer in their lifetime. Some of them will be fatal,” Stefani said.

In a Statement Blue Shield said, in part: “For Medicare members, health plans must follow medical policy established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”


Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock

Published

on

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock


Few things are more valuable in the Bay Area than real estate. In San Francisco, the median house price is now over $2 million. Last month, at least seven houses in the city sold for $1 million over the asking price, and buyers regularly offer to pay in cash or waive contingencies to stay competitive. Yet there is one thing that remains even more valuable than a house, and possibly more valuable than money itself: stock in Anthropic or OpenAI.

Last week, 160 Noe Street, an Edwardian home in San Francisco’s desirable Duboce Triangle neighborhood, was listed for sale at $2.9 million—or the equivalent amount in Anthropic or OpenAI shares, as based on those companies’ current valuations. Rachel Swann, the listing agent, says she was inspired to set these unusual terms after meeting several Anthropic employees at an open house for a different property. “These people have a lot of paper wealth, but they don’t always have the liquidity to do things they want,” Swann says. Some of these employees were expecting to come into as much as $50 million from their Anthropic shares, and wondered if they could use that as leverage to buy a house, according to Swann. “This kept coming up over and over again.”

Swann’s listing is unconventional, but not singular. In April, an investment banker named Storm Duncan offered to exchange his Mill Valley home and an adjacent parcel of land for Anthropic shares. And in May, Vijay Chattha, who owns an agency that does PR for tech companies, listed his Healdsburg home for $2.5 million, or $2 million in Anthropic stock. “I want to sell my house, and I want to invest in Anthropic,” Chattha says. “Why not combine the two?

Chattha’s house—a three bed, three bath with a pool and a bocce court in a part of Sonoma County that abuts some of the region’s most famous wineries—also comes with coveted short-term rental status, allowing the owner to list it on platforms like Airbnb. Only a handful of properties in Healdsburg come with that status, and only about a dozen come up for sale in a given year.

Advertisement

Chattha is offering a $500,000 discount to Anthropic employees because he believes the value of Anthropic shares will grow faster than any other investment, and his vacation home in wine country is the best bargaining chip he has to try to access them. “If you look at Anthropic’s growth last year, it’s insane,” he says, noting the $380 billion valuation the company claimed in February. “Now they’re raising at $965 billion. That’s three X in like three months.” He added that he was open to exchanging the house for shares in Anthropic, but not OpenAI, because he prefers using Anthropic’s products.

The real estate listings come at a time when investors are salivating at the record-high valuations of Anthropic and OpenAI, and even those considered wealthy by Bay Area standards are feeling FOMO about the affluence that could come from these companies’ debuts on the stock market. (On Monday, Anthropic submitted paperwork for its initial public offering; OpenAI is also reportedly preparing to file in the coming months.) Despite the unprecedented valuations of these companies, many people believe their stock prices will only go up, and that anyone who gets a piece now could win the jackpot.

People are clamoring to buy equity in OpenAI and Anthropic on the secondary market, leading to a frenzy of transactions that may or may not be legitimate. As a result, Anthropic updated its policy around “unauthorized Anthropic stock sales” this spring, which notes that “if someone purports to sell Anthropic shares without proper board approval, that transaction is invalid.” A spokesperson for Anthropic pointed back to this policy when asked about the possibility of exchanging company shares for real estate.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026

Published

on

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026


Welcome to our running tally of Election Night results. Or, as this is California, well beyond tonight, as results continue to trickle in.

The first batch of results should arrive at 8:45 p.m., with three more to follow tonight. The Department of Elections has the breakdown.

San Francisco is voting in three special elections, for District 2 and District 4 supervisors and for a Board of Education member. Both supervisor races are referendums on housing, especially District 2, while the main backdrop of the D4 race is all the hot feelings around the fate of the Sunset Dunes Park (nee Great Highway).

The winners of all three special races will have to compete again in November for their seats.

Advertisement

Keeping it local, SF is also voting on four ballot measures. Prop A is for a bond to pay for an emergency water-system. B is for term limits. C and D are dueling measures related to the “overpaid CEO” tax. (Links go to our reporting on each race or issue; or click here for our Election 2026 page.)

Vote local, think national: Which two candidates will advance to the November election to replace Nancy Pelosi?

Statewide races include the primaries for governor, education superintendent, lieutenant governor, and much more.

Polls close soon. If you haven’t voted yet, find your polling station here.

Tuesday, June 2, 5:40 p.m.

Two and a half hours until our polls close. Before we go down the local rabbit hole, a reminder that other states have primary action today: New Jersey, Iowa, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Montana.

Advertisement

Why does it take so long to get results in California? CalMatters has you covered on that story. We shouldn’t expect a call tonight on the governor’s race.

The last big election was November 5, 2024. (Remember?) Ten days later, there were still races to call in San Francisco.


Advertisement

So if you’re waiting for the pundits (and maybe even us) to tell you What It All Means, you might have to wait a while.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending