Within the fall of 2020, after Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump within the presidential election, Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the spouse of Supreme Courtroom Justice Clarence Thomas, repeatedly urged White Home Chief of Workers Mark Meadows to try to overturn the election outcomes, in keeping with textual content messages obtained by congressional investigators.

“Assist This Nice President stand agency, Mark!!!” Thomas wrote to Meadows on Nov. 10 after the election was formally known as for Biden. “You’re the chief, with him, who’s standing for America’s constitutional governance on the precipice. The bulk is aware of Biden and the Left is trying the best Heist of our Historical past.”

Sources acquainted with the textual content messages, which had been obtained by the Home choose committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol assault, confirmed their authenticity to ABC Information. The content material of the messages was first reported by The Washington Publish and CBS Information.

Meadows, who didn’t reply to all of Thomas’ missives, texted in late November that Trump’s problem of the election outcomes was “a battle of excellent versus evil.”

“Evil at all times appears just like the victor till the King of Kings triumphs,” he wrote. “Don’t develop weary in nicely doing. The battle continues. I’ve staked my profession on it. Effectively a minimum of my time in DC on it.”

“Thanks!! Wanted that! This plus a dialog with my greatest buddy simply now … I’ll attempt to maintain holding on. America is price it,” Thomas replied.

The messages — greater than two dozen between Thomas and Meadows in November of 2020, and one from Jan. 10 — had been among the many 1000’s of pages of textual content messages, emails and paperwork Meadows voluntarily turned over to the committee final 12 months, earlier than he reversed course and determined to not cooperate with the inquiry.

Thomas didn’t reply to a request for remark from ABC Information. A spokesman for the committee declined to touch upon the messages or their contents.

Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, informed the Washington Free Beacon in March that she and her husband do not speak to one another about their work.

WATCH: What do texts imply for Justice Thomas?

“Like so many married {couples}, we share most of the identical beliefs, ideas, and aspirations for America,” Thomas informed the conservative information outlet. “However now we have our personal separate careers, and our personal concepts and opinions too. Clarence would not talk about his work with me, and I do not contain him in my work.”

Thomas stated that she attended the “Cease the Steal” rally exterior the White Home on Jan. 6, however left early as a result of it was chilly. She stated she had no function in planning the occasion.

Concerning the assault on the Capitol, Thomas informed the Free Beacon she was “disenchanted and pissed off that there was violence that occurred following a peaceable gathering.”

Ethics consultants have raised questions on Thomas’ work on main points that come earlier than the Supreme Courtroom, on which her husband sits.

In January, the courtroom declined to dam the Jan. 6 committee from acquiring Trump White Home information over the objection of just one justice: Clarence Thomas.

“There have been some eyebrows raised when Justice Thomas was that lone vote,” stated Kate Shaw, ABC Information Supreme Courtroom analyst and Cardozo Legislation professor. “However he didn’t clarify himself, so we do not truly know why he wished to take up the case.”

There aren’t any specific ethics tips that govern the actions of a justice’s partner, consultants say, however there are guidelines about justices avoiding conflicts of curiosity. Federal legislation requires that federal judges recuse themselves from circumstances at any time when their “impartiality may moderately be questioned.”