Finance
With major change to CHSAA’s tournament and playoff finance structure, host schools now in position to make more money off postseason
LONE TREE — Colorado high schools are about to make a lot more money hosting playoff games and events.
The CHSAA Legislative Council voted to amend the association’s tournament and playoff finance structure on Tuesday at the DCSD Legacy Campus. Previously, host schools paid a percentage of their playoff gate revenue to CHSAA and also a portion to help reimburse visiting teams for traveling.
But under the new amendment — which passed overwhelmingly via a 56-14 vote — each member school will now pay an annual playoff fee to CHSAA, with the amount based on what basketball classification that school is in. With that fee paid, schools now get to keep the profits from hosting playoff games and events such as regionals, without having to share that revenue with CHSAA.
“This is a structural and fundamental change to the way that we’ve done things,” CHSAA commissioner Mike Krueger said. “This approach is more of a cost-share, because we are a membership that’s a benefit-share approach.”
The amendment came to the floor on Tuesday following months of research by CHSAA’s Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee, which found that schools hosting playoff games and tournaments (such as wrestling or volleyball regionals) were consistently finding themselves in the red.
For example, Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee chairperson Paul Cain, the athletic director for the Mesa County Valley School District, said that 85% of last year’s hosts for wrestling regionals lost money. With this change, that deficit would now be a $5,000 profit for each host school.
The association’s tournament and playoff finance reports reveal that postseason money accounts for 5-10% of CHSAA’s organizational budget, and Cain argues that “the teams that are in the playoffs are currently subsidizing this money, and now, this would go across the membership.”
CHSAA Director of Finance Sarah Vernon-Brunner said this amendment will have “no financial effect on CHSAA.”
“The committee … looked at a five-year average of playoff revenues and used that as the basis for determining the total (playoff) fees,” Vernon-Brunner wrote in an email to The Denver Post.
While CHSAA membership fees will remain the same for a third straight year in 2024-25 — each school’s membership dues are $948, plus a $161 participation fee for each sport/activity — this playoff fee will now be tacked on to schools’ costs. Class 1A schools will pay $600; 2A $800; 3A $1,000; 4A $1,400; 5A $1,900 and 6A $2,600.
Two of Colorado’s largest districts, Denver Public Schools and Aurora Public Schools, opposed the amendment.
In a statement to The Denver Post, DPS said that the amendment’s “year-over-year projections show significant financial impacts to the district,” and DPS district athletic director echoed that sentiment on Tuesday.
“We ran the models in Denver with our current structure,” Bendjy said. “We lost $2,000 over the last two months in postseason activities, but with this proposed structure and the same events, we’re now down $16,000. That’s a loss of 800%. Philosophically, this is not a financial structure we can get behind at this time.”
APS district athletic director Casey Powell also spoke out against the amendment ahead of its passing vote.
“This will create an absolute stable function for CHSAA, but it will completely flip my budget personally, upside-down, for the way I hold my budget,” Powell said. “Because I don’t get that (new) revenue, because my schools don’t regularly make the playoffs. So to say I’m going to get that (playoff) fee back is not true.”
Krueger acknowledged those concerns, but said that “for all intents and purposes, this is a membership due.”
As part of the amendment, in a head-to-head playoff game, if the host makes $1,000 or more in net income, then 25% of that gets paid to the visiting team. Cain said the 75/25 split would be done on an “honor system.”
Krueger also added that this new model would incentivize schools to host regional tournaments, rather than disincentivize them, and that districts like DPS and APS could possibly recoup their playoff fee by hosting those tournaments.
“If you host a regional, this should in some ways help, because events you wouldn’t look to currently host maybe that would change and encourage our membership to host these events,” Krueger said. “And if you deserve the right to host (based off playoff seeding), should our system be one in where it costs you significantly to host that (game or) event?”
To Krueger’s point, this fall, Cherry Creek athletic director and Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee member Jason Wilkins said the Bruins took a loss on their first-round football playoff game despite a couple thousand people in attendance at the Stutler Bowl.
Under the current model, CHSAA receives 10% of the gross receipts and 70% of the net proceeds off football playoff games from host schools. In basketball, which is traditionally the association’s biggest playoff money-maker, CHSAA’s due 20% of the adjusted gross receipts.
Wilkins said that cost structure, in addition to having to pay ticket-takers, police, security guards, officials and visiting travel expenses, “doesn’t leave a lot of opportunity for profit for hosts.”
Mead athletic director Chad Eisentrager doubled down on Wilkins’ opinion, arguing that profits from playoff games and events “should stay within those communities that are putting in the work, the time and resources.”
“Three years ago we hosted Roosevelt in the state semifinals for football,” Eisentrager explained. “We had almost $13,000 in revenue, and we lost money as a result of the security and all the other fees that went along with running that event.
“So in fact, we are losing money on these (playoff events), when my community, who had a right to host that event, got to keep zero of that revenue. This (new amendment) spreads (the cost burden) out, and if you’re successful enough to host one big basketball game, one big football game or some of these other (postseason) events like regional wrestling, (you’ll make the fee back).”
Cain also argued that the new amendment creates “some flexibility for schools on how they treat the postseason.” For instance, schools wanting to boost attendance and atmosphere can now elect to not charge their students for postseason games, so long as they let the visiting students in for free, too. Before, there was a fee for not charging a gate.
And the Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee said that in addition to increased revenues for many schools, the amendment also eliminates a lot of paperwork that was convoluting the money trail.
“One of the things (the committee) has heard is, visiting schools always don’t get their (travel) money like they’re supposed to,” Wilkins said. “Such-and-such school is supposed to pay, but it’s not always that simple, or that timely, or you have to keep asking. Different districts have different financial systems. So there’s a lot of (red tape), in conjunction to the time filling out a lot of these forms.”
The amendment will go into effect for the next two-year CHSAA cycle.
Want more sports news? Sign up for the Sports Omelette to get all our analysis on Denver’s teams.
Finance
Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath
Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers
Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers
https://lindseyhorvath.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/image003-1024×888.jpg
1024
888
Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath
//lindseyhorvath.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/horvath.light_.pink_.v3.png
Finance
How “impact accounting” can integrate sustainability with finance
Around three years ago, Charles Giancarlo, CEO of data platform Pure Storage, came back from Davos and asked his sustainability team to look into an idea he’d encountered at the meeting: Impact accounting, a method for integrating emissions and other externalities into company balance sheets.
The idea had been slowly picking up adherents in Europe for around a decade, but Pure Storage, which rebranded this month to Everpure, would go on to become the first U.S. company to join the Value Balancing Alliance (VBA), a group of 30 or so companies developing the approach. Trellis checked in last week with Everpure and the VBA for an update.
How does impact accounting work?
At the heart of the approach are a set of “valuation factors,” developed by third-party experts, that are used to convert activity data for emissions, water use, air pollution and other externalities into dollar figures that can be integrated into balance sheets. In the case of emissions, for example, the VBA uses $220 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, a figure based on the estimated social impact of rising greenhouse gases levels.
At Everpure, one long-term goal is to have cost centers be aware of the dollar impact of relevant externalities. After an initial focus on identifying and collecting the most material data, the team is now rolling out a dashboard containing several years of impact accounting numbers.
“It’s catered to different personas,” explained Adrienne Uphoff, Everpure’s ESG regulations and impact accounting manager. Finance was an initial use case, with product managers also on the roadmap. “You can compare it to financial numbers to really understand the impact intensity.”
What value does the approach bring?
“The essence of impact accounting is that you’re translating all these different metrics in the sustainability space into the language the decision makers understand,” said Christian Heller, the VBA’s CEO. “Everyone understands what you’re talking about, and you get a sense of the magnitude of your impact and the risks and opportunities.”
This has allowed Everpure to calculate what Uphoff called the “environmental costs of goods sold” and to estimate the impact of circular strategies, such as refurbishing hardware. The analysis reveals “impact savings across the full value chain across five different environmental topics all in a single dollar unit,” she said.
Analyses like that can then be shared with customers and used to distinguish Everpure from competitors. “The long-term winners in this space are going to be those that can perform against sustainability goals,” said Kathy Mulvany, Everpure’s global head of sustainability. “Impact accounting gives us a way to bring comparability, so companies can understand how they’re truly stacking up.”
What does it take to implement impact accounting?
A great deal of technical work goes into creating valuation factors, but the system is designed so that outside experts create the numbers and hand them to sustainability professionals for use. Still, not every company will have the in-house environmental data that is also needed. Many companies have been collecting emissions data for five years or more, for example, but detailed datasets for water use are less common.
Internal teams also need to be familiar with the concepts. “One of the key learnings from our impact accounting implementation is that the socialization curve is longer than you expect,” said Uphoff. “Attaching monetary values on externalities introduces new metrics and mental models, and that can naturally make people a little nervous at first. It takes time and dialogue for teams to build confidence in how to interpret this new lens on performance.”
What’s next?
In the early days of impact accounting, companies and consultancies worked independently on different methodologies. Now that work is coalescing, said Heller. The International Standards Organization will start work on a standard this summer, he added, and the VBA is having conversations with the IFRS Foundation, which creates international financial reporting standards.
The approach may also be integrated into mandatory disclosure standards. Heller noted that the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive mentions the potential benefits of companies putting a dollar figure on some environmental impacts. “It’s the next evolutionary step of any kind of sustainability disclosure regulations,” he said.
.
Finance
2 Aspira charter high schools to close by April due to financial issues
Chicago Public Schools is shutting down two Aspira charter high schools by the middle of the year, following financial issues over the past year.
School leaders are calling the move “unprecedented.”
Students at the Aspira Business and Finance High School at 2989 N. Milwaukee Ave. in Avondale held a walkout right outside of Aspira after the CEO said they only have enough money to stay open for the next four to five weeks.
Students wanted their questions answered as to why they’re being transferred to other schools.
Angelina Mota is a senior at the high school and said she is concerned about her future.
“It’s very difficult, especially for us, hearing that credits might not go all the way with us. That our graduation might just be taken back. It’s very disappointing,” she said.
This is the first time a CPS school will close before the end of the school year. Both Aspira and CPS said the charter network won’t have the funds to stay open past April.
“The burden on our seniors has got to be… they don’t give a damn about the kids. The seniors,” Aspira of Illinois CEO Edgar Lopez said while fighting back his emotions.
The school is facing a $2.9 million deficit, impacting 540 students and dozens of staff.
CPS said they have already given more than $2.5 million to the charter school to help sustain operations. They said under Illinois law, it reached the legal limit of funding it can provide.
This has been a year-long effort in compliance with state charter school law.
In a statement, CPS said, “Aspira has not submitted required documentation, including evidence of funding to support operations through this school year.”
The documents CPS said are overdue include the school’s fiscal year 25 financial audit, general ledger, and payroll.
“We’re not hiding nothing. The financial documents that they were asking for, Jose told them, we’ll have them to you by Friday. Then they send a letter by Thursday. They didn’t even give us a chance,” Lopez said.
CPS said they’re initiating this due to the lack of financial transparency and solvency.
“We know we don’t want to go anywhere else because we’re used to the routine we have here,” said student Arichely Molina.
“Please let us (stay) open. at least until we graduate,” Mota said.
CPS said their main goal is to ensure the kids have a safety net as they transition to another school.
The second school is located at 3986 W. Barry Ave., also in the Avondale neighborhood.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts7 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO7 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon5 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Wisconsin2 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin