Finance
With major change to CHSAA’s tournament and playoff finance structure, host schools now in position to make more money off postseason
LONE TREE — Colorado high schools are about to make a lot more money hosting playoff games and events.
The CHSAA Legislative Council voted to amend the association’s tournament and playoff finance structure on Tuesday at the DCSD Legacy Campus. Previously, host schools paid a percentage of their playoff gate revenue to CHSAA and also a portion to help reimburse visiting teams for traveling.
But under the new amendment — which passed overwhelmingly via a 56-14 vote — each member school will now pay an annual playoff fee to CHSAA, with the amount based on what basketball classification that school is in. With that fee paid, schools now get to keep the profits from hosting playoff games and events such as regionals, without having to share that revenue with CHSAA.
“This is a structural and fundamental change to the way that we’ve done things,” CHSAA commissioner Mike Krueger said. “This approach is more of a cost-share, because we are a membership that’s a benefit-share approach.”
The amendment came to the floor on Tuesday following months of research by CHSAA’s Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee, which found that schools hosting playoff games and tournaments (such as wrestling or volleyball regionals) were consistently finding themselves in the red.
For example, Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee chairperson Paul Cain, the athletic director for the Mesa County Valley School District, said that 85% of last year’s hosts for wrestling regionals lost money. With this change, that deficit would now be a $5,000 profit for each host school.
The association’s tournament and playoff finance reports reveal that postseason money accounts for 5-10% of CHSAA’s organizational budget, and Cain argues that “the teams that are in the playoffs are currently subsidizing this money, and now, this would go across the membership.”
CHSAA Director of Finance Sarah Vernon-Brunner said this amendment will have “no financial effect on CHSAA.”
“The committee … looked at a five-year average of playoff revenues and used that as the basis for determining the total (playoff) fees,” Vernon-Brunner wrote in an email to The Denver Post.
While CHSAA membership fees will remain the same for a third straight year in 2024-25 — each school’s membership dues are $948, plus a $161 participation fee for each sport/activity — this playoff fee will now be tacked on to schools’ costs. Class 1A schools will pay $600; 2A $800; 3A $1,000; 4A $1,400; 5A $1,900 and 6A $2,600.
Two of Colorado’s largest districts, Denver Public Schools and Aurora Public Schools, opposed the amendment.
In a statement to The Denver Post, DPS said that the amendment’s “year-over-year projections show significant financial impacts to the district,” and DPS district athletic director echoed that sentiment on Tuesday.
“We ran the models in Denver with our current structure,” Bendjy said. “We lost $2,000 over the last two months in postseason activities, but with this proposed structure and the same events, we’re now down $16,000. That’s a loss of 800%. Philosophically, this is not a financial structure we can get behind at this time.”
APS district athletic director Casey Powell also spoke out against the amendment ahead of its passing vote.
“This will create an absolute stable function for CHSAA, but it will completely flip my budget personally, upside-down, for the way I hold my budget,” Powell said. “Because I don’t get that (new) revenue, because my schools don’t regularly make the playoffs. So to say I’m going to get that (playoff) fee back is not true.”
Krueger acknowledged those concerns, but said that “for all intents and purposes, this is a membership due.”
As part of the amendment, in a head-to-head playoff game, if the host makes $1,000 or more in net income, then 25% of that gets paid to the visiting team. Cain said the 75/25 split would be done on an “honor system.”
Krueger also added that this new model would incentivize schools to host regional tournaments, rather than disincentivize them, and that districts like DPS and APS could possibly recoup their playoff fee by hosting those tournaments.
“If you host a regional, this should in some ways help, because events you wouldn’t look to currently host maybe that would change and encourage our membership to host these events,” Krueger said. “And if you deserve the right to host (based off playoff seeding), should our system be one in where it costs you significantly to host that (game or) event?”
To Krueger’s point, this fall, Cherry Creek athletic director and Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee member Jason Wilkins said the Bruins took a loss on their first-round football playoff game despite a couple thousand people in attendance at the Stutler Bowl.
Under the current model, CHSAA receives 10% of the gross receipts and 70% of the net proceeds off football playoff games from host schools. In basketball, which is traditionally the association’s biggest playoff money-maker, CHSAA’s due 20% of the adjusted gross receipts.
Wilkins said that cost structure, in addition to having to pay ticket-takers, police, security guards, officials and visiting travel expenses, “doesn’t leave a lot of opportunity for profit for hosts.”
Mead athletic director Chad Eisentrager doubled down on Wilkins’ opinion, arguing that profits from playoff games and events “should stay within those communities that are putting in the work, the time and resources.”
“Three years ago we hosted Roosevelt in the state semifinals for football,” Eisentrager explained. “We had almost $13,000 in revenue, and we lost money as a result of the security and all the other fees that went along with running that event.
“So in fact, we are losing money on these (playoff events), when my community, who had a right to host that event, got to keep zero of that revenue. This (new amendment) spreads (the cost burden) out, and if you’re successful enough to host one big basketball game, one big football game or some of these other (postseason) events like regional wrestling, (you’ll make the fee back).”
Cain also argued that the new amendment creates “some flexibility for schools on how they treat the postseason.” For instance, schools wanting to boost attendance and atmosphere can now elect to not charge their students for postseason games, so long as they let the visiting students in for free, too. Before, there was a fee for not charging a gate.
And the Tournament & Playoff Finance Committee said that in addition to increased revenues for many schools, the amendment also eliminates a lot of paperwork that was convoluting the money trail.
“One of the things (the committee) has heard is, visiting schools always don’t get their (travel) money like they’re supposed to,” Wilkins said. “Such-and-such school is supposed to pay, but it’s not always that simple, or that timely, or you have to keep asking. Different districts have different financial systems. So there’s a lot of (red tape), in conjunction to the time filling out a lot of these forms.”
The amendment will go into effect for the next two-year CHSAA cycle.
Want more sports news? Sign up for the Sports Omelette to get all our analysis on Denver’s teams.
Finance
Local M&A advisory firm Matrix acquired by banking giant Citizens Financial – Richmond BizSense
Matri x Capital Markets Group is now a division of Citizens Financial Group. (Image Courtesy Citizens Financial Group)
Matrix Capital Markets Group is used to helping businesses line up mergers and acquisitions.
For its latest transaction, the Richmond-based M&A advisory and investment banking firm was itself the subject of the deal.
Matrix was acquired last week by Rhode Island-based banking giant Citizens Financial Group.
Matrix, along with its nearly three dozen employees, including 20 in Richmond, are now operating as a division of Citizens, within the $226 billion bank’s investment banking arm, Citizens JMP Securities.
Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. It involved an asset purchase that bought out Matrix’s 15 shareholders.
The deal ends Matrix’s 38-year run as an independent firm, a notable streak in an industry where consolidation of smaller firms into larger ones is common.
Matrix was founded in Richmond in 1988 by Scott Frayser and Jeff Moore and has since hit its stride by building a niche in handling deals for companies in the downstream energy and convenience retail sector.
The firm has been run in recent years by president Spencer Cavalier and Cedric Fortemps, co-head of the firm’s largest investment banking team.
Fortemps said Matrix began to search for a larger acquirer last year.
Cedric Fortemps
“The board decided to see if we could find a partner and a transaction that could build on what we’ve built thus far,” Fortemps said.
Matrix enlisted investment banking firm Houlihan Lokey to help in the search and negotiate on its behalf, along with the law firm Calfee as its legal advisor.
Fortemps said Citizen rose to the top of the pack of suitors in part due to JMP Securities’ track record of acquiring smaller firms like Matrix.
“They have acquired four other firms very similar to ours. Seeing the successes they had with those groups… the playbook is really to let the firms continue to operate the way they had,” Fortemps said.
Matrix’s Richmond office in the Gateway Plaza building downtown will continue to operate, as will its second office in Baltimore.
The Matrix brand will continue to be used for the time being but will eventually be phased out.
Fortemps said the firm’s success and particularly its growth in recent years has been fueled by its expertise in working deals for downstream energy clients – such as wholesale fuels distributors, propane and heating oil distributors – and convenience store and gas station chains.
Matrix’s rise in that sector began in 1997, when it hired Tom Kelso, who lived in Baltimore and owned a heating oil fuels distribution business. Kelso, who would eventually serve as the firm’s president prior to Cavalier, had a vision to launch an M&A firm for that industry.
“It took seven to eight years to grow it but eventually we were able to get a reputation of really high quality work and those successes on smaller transactions resulted in us being considered for larger deals,” Fortemps said.
Today, 21of the firm’s 26 investment bankers work on the team that handles deals for those industries. It controls about 40% market share for the M&A market for those sectors, Fortemps said.
The firm closes nearly two dozen transactions a year over the last five years and has closed 500 deals since its inception.
The typical value of its deals is more than $20 million, though the transactions it has closed over the last three years in the energy and convenience retail sectors have grown to $140 million per deal, Matrix said.
Its largest deal to date was closed last year, involving the $1.6 billion acquisition of convenience store chain Giant Eagle.
Matrix also works deals in other industries such as lubricants distribution, automotive after-market suppliers and car washes, as well as outdoor recreation and the marine industry.
After decades of representing buyers and sellers in M&A, Fortemps said the Citizens deal was a new experience for the Matrix team: being the target of the transaction, rather than the ones facilitating it.
“It certainly made me appreciate everything our clients have to go through on the other side of the table,” he said.
Finance
Deutsche Bank’s Expanding Sports Finance Strategy
As the business side of team sports, such as football, becomes larger and more complex, the opportunities for banks to provide financing solutions for the individuals and institutions involved proliferate. At Deutsche Bank’s private bank, it sees considerable opportunities ahead.
With American and other non-UK investors/owners buying into UK
football teams, it has highlighted that handling the
financial side of sports is now a distinct asset class that even
those uninterested in sports should consider.
Deutsche Bank’s private banking arm certainly considers sports
finance a sufficiently large area to warrant a specialist
offering, as announced
a few days ago. The business focuses on Europe and the
US.
The financing business is led by Arjun Nagarkatti, who is the
head of the private bank for the US and Europe international
business. Deutsche
Bank has appointed Sowmya Kotha in London and Joshua Frank in
New York, who report to Adam Russ, head of wealth management and
business lending.
“Sport can be a local passion project. However, it is becoming
more of a legitimate asset class. Even a non-sports person should
look at sports,” Nagarkatti told WealthBriefing in a
meeting at the German bank’s London offices in the City. “These
are big businesses and a lot of people still don’t know how big
they are.”
Family offices/ultra HNW individuals are trying to take
a “more institutional” approach to transacting in sports
teams, he said.
Setting up such a business feeds into the specialist lending and
financial advisory work that Deutsche has discussed
with this publication in recent months. (See
an example here – via Hong Kong.) This work uses the
combined private bank/investment banking connections where
private clients will also have operating business concerns.
The sports financing business shows that this area is not simply
a private banking niche. Rival Citigroup, for example,
spoke to this news service in 2025 about its work with
ultra-wealthy people wanting to buy, sell and run sports teams.
Our US correspondent recently wrote about opportunities for
wealth management arising from changes in college
sports.
The expanded capability at Deutsche on the sports side is
“significant for the bank,” Nagarkatti said. “It is a core focus
for us.”
UHNW sports owners/potential owners tend to be ideal clients –
they are internationally minded, want advice and guidance on
financial/personal wealth matters, he continued. “This is a big
opportunity for us and it is a consistent connection we have had
with clients, and we have been doing this for 10 to 15
years.”
Deutsche is initially concentrating on the English Premier
League. As its US franchise has expanded, this has led to
financing across all four major US sports leagues: National
Football League; Major League Baseball; National Basketball
Association, and National Hockey League.
Mention of cross-border owners of clubs leads to potential owners
of, say, a UK football club needing to understand that when
they buy a team, they’re also buying into hopes and dreams.
Owners raise their heads above a parapet – not always a fun
experience.
“You become a public figure,” Nagarkatti said.
One example that springs to mind is Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the
billionaire founder of INEOS, the chemical producer who took
a 27.7 per cent stake in Manchester United more than a year
ago. While well known in business circles before buying into the
“Red Devils” –
one of the most famous sports institutions in the world – his
profile has risen since, with every comment – controversial or
otherwise – analysed, not always kindly.
American owners of teams have to adjust to the risk, for example
when a football (soccer) team gets relegated, Nagarkatti
said. Anyone looking to own a club must understand risks,
including how their public profile, assuming they were very
private people, rises rapidly, and in ways that are not always
comfortable if a team has problems, he said.
There is a need for realism.
“When you buy these top assets, you must spend time and work them
and increase their value. You must be prepared to invest time,
such as on the team, stadiums, facilities,” Nagarkatti said. “It
is like buying a hotel. You cannot just sit there and think it
will go up in value by 10 times.”
For the wealth management industry in general, the business of
sports teams, as well as the individual financial affairs of
sportsmen and women, has become a distinct – and large –
specialism. For example, the Rockefeller Global Family Office has
experts who look after athletes and entertainers. Other firms
that have expertise in and around sports include Carnegie Private
Wealth, for example, and Merrill Lynch Management. In the UK, the
private banking group Coutts has a sports, media and
entertainment division for its wealthy clients. Standard
Chartered, the UK-listed bank with a significant presence in
Asia, has launched a new alternative fund focused on sports for
ultra-high net worth and high net worth clients under its Global
Private Bank. Standard Chartered is a sponsor of Liverpool
FC.
Deutsche Bank announced 2025 full-year and fourth-quarter
financial results here.
Finance
Retired Aussies facing sad $60,000 superannuation reality impacting millions: ‘Very real’
Australians now need a record amount of superannuation to afford a comfortable retirement, and one group is still lagging significantly behind. Women are approaching retirement with tens of thousands of dollars less in superannuation than men, but there are moves that can be made now to help close the gap.
By the age of 40 to 44, men have a median super balance of $108,344, compared to women with $79,445 – a gap of nearly $30,000. This gap peaks in the 55 to 59 age range, where men have $202,584 on average and women $140,662 – a difference of more than $60,000.
AustralianSuper deputy chief executive and chief member officer Rose Kerlin told Yahoo Finance while we’ve seen some improvements over time, the super gender gap is “still very real” and becomes the most obvious as women approached retirement.
RELATED
“A big part of the gap comes down to caregiving and disparities in pay. When women take time out of the workforce or move into part-time roles to care for children or family members, their super takes a hit, and that impact compounds year after year,” she said.
This gap is particularly worrying now that a single homeowner aged 67 needs a lump sum of $630,000, up from $595,000, to achieve a comfortable retirement. Couple homeowners need a balance of $730,000 in super, which is up from $690,000.
In contrast, the latest ATO data shows men at or approaching retirement at 60 to 64 have a median balance of $219,73, while women have $163,218.
The government has flagged reforms to help address the gap. Since July last year, superannuation has been paid on government parental leave payments.
From July next year, the Low Income Superannuation Tax Offset (LISTO) income threshold will increase from $37,000 to $45,000 to align with the top of the second income-tax bracket. The maximum LISTO payment will increase from $500 to $810.
While policy reform is important, Kerlin said there were also things women could do now to feel more on top of their super and more confident about where they’re headed.
“Small actions today can help build greater confidence and security for the years ahead,” she said.
One action could be making additional contributions, even small ones, whenever possible, as this could make a big difference over time.
AustralianSuper’s modelling found that someone who made after-tax contributions of $600 annually between the ages of 35 to 39 and met the eligibility criteria for the government’s co-contribution of $300 each year could retire with $9,000 more.
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts6 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Maryland1 week agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Florida1 week agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Pennsylvania4 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Oregon1 week ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
News1 week ago2 Survivors Describe the Terror and Tragedy of the Tahoe Avalanche
-
Sports4 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death