Connect with us

Finance

From your 401(k) to bonds, here’s how to protect your financial well-being as debt default worries grow | CNN Business

Published

on

From your 401(k) to bonds, here’s how to protect your financial well-being as debt default worries grow | CNN Business


New York
CNN
 — 

The White House and House GOP negotiators are rushing to finalize a deal to raise the country’s debt limit.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned the department will not have enough funds to pay all of the nation’s obligations in full and on time if a deal isn’t reached by June 5. This gives lawmakers a few more days to put a package together, but the X-date is still quickly approaching.

On Wednesday night, Fitch Ratings laid out a stark warning to the US government: Raise the debt ceiling or put the world’s biggest economy at risk of a downgrade.

With that X-date only about one week away, there’s still no deal to raise the debt ceiling – putting Americans’ finances in danger.

Advertisement

Failure to lift the debt limit, the amount the US government can borrow to pay its bills, could affect countless aspects of American lives, from how much people pay for a mortgage to paychecks for federal workers and beyond.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said the House will recess following votes on Thursday as negotiators continue to work on a debt ceiling deal, although Speaker Kevin McCarthy urged lawmakers to stay close over Memorial Day weekend.

How can Americans prepare for a US default if the debt limit doesn’t get raised? Here’s how you can protect your financial well-being.

The roughly 66 million retirees, disabled workers and others who receive Social Security benefits should brace themselves for potential delays in their monthly checks.

Many of these folks depend heavily on these funds to cover their living expenses, including food, rent, utilities and health care. The average benefit for retired workers is $1,827 a month in 2023.

Advertisement

Almost two-thirds of beneficiaries rely on Social Security for half of their income, and for 40% of recipients, the payments constitute at least 90% of their income, according to the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

“Beneficiaries have earned their benefits through a lifetime of hard work and they rely on their benefits,” Max Richtman, the committee’s CEO, wrote to lawmakers last month. “These payments are at risk of not being paid on time or in full for the first time in our nation’s history.”

However, it’s possible the Treasury Department could continue making on-time payments because of the entitlement program’s trust fund, said Shai Akabas, director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

The benefits are disbursed four times a month, on the third day of the month and on three Wednesdays. Roughly $25 billion a week is sent out, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Review your equity-to-bond allocation and make any necessary adjustments, Martin advised. Stocks, which are riskier investments than bonds, will probably get more volatile as the deadline date approaches, CNN has reported.

Advertisement

If the US does default, it has to then be resolved, experts say. And when it does, there will be a “relief rally” in the market, Callie Cox, eToro US investment analyst, previously told CNN.

However, there could be an immediate correction period after a deal is reached as the Treasury replenishes the cash it burned through when it couldn’t borrow money, Michael Reynolds, vice president of investment strategy at Glenmede, told CNN.

Investors may be tempted to buy the dip, but there are “so many other pressures weighing on the economy,” Cox said.

“You don’t want to get over-invested with a recession on the horizon,” Reynolds said. In his view, it’s only worth taking advantage of a market sale if the S&P 500 dips below 16% of its current value.

Short-term investors should be even more cautious, experts said.

Advertisement

Bond investors should expect volatility even during deal negotiations. US Treasuries are considered to be the world’s safest assets because they are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, but the uncertainty over a debt ceiling deal adds risk.

With Treasuries, the key question is when investors will be repaid, not if.

Experts assume that even if the United States briefly goes past the X-date, it will be resolved quickly and the government will make good on its obligations, CNN reported.

If you invest in bonds, pay attention to when your Treasury bills are maturing.

Those who have invested in Treasury bills maturing on or right after June 1 and who definitely need their money at that time — for example, to pay their own bills — might consider selling those bills now and reinvesting in bills that mature sooner, Collin Martin, director and fixed income strategist at the Schwab Center for Financial Research, suggested in an interview with CNN.

Advertisement

And for those into bond funds, check to see that the bond portion of your portfolio has adequate exposure to intermediate and longer-term bonds, rather than being too heavily weighted toward short-term higher yielding bonds.

Steer clear of corporate junk bonds or emerging market bonds, CNN has previously reported. That’s because if the US does default, high-risk debt instruments will come under the most pressure.

“If you need to borrow money, you need the confidence of the markets to lend to you,” Martin said.

“Our general guidance is for investors to maintain a balanced portfolio in keeping with their goals and to remain disciplined. A long-term view is especially important during periods of uncertainty,” Vanguard spokesperson Jessica Schifalacqua previously told CNN.

Stocks could shed as much as a third of their value even if an agreement is reached, erasing $12 trillion in household debt, Moody’s Analytics said.

Advertisement

Some Department of Defense workers may see their paychecks delayed — including 1.4 million active-duty members of the military and more than 2 million federal civilian workers. Federal government contractors could also see a lag in payments, which could affect their ability to compensate their workers, CNN previously reported.

Military families should make sure they have extra money and that their emergency funds are topped off to weather a missed paycheck, Mike Hunsberger, owner of Next Mission Financial Planning and an Air Force veteran, told CNN. For those with thin budgets, Hunsberger suggested looking again to see if there’s anything else to cut back on, at least temporarily.

Every military service has an organization that can help with temporary loans for those who could be in a crunch — think a car breaking down or an emergency ticket home for a family death, Hunsberger said. Some military-facing banks could also be of assistance.

Those who receive veterans benefits should also have an emergency stockpile prepared — disability payments and pensions for some low-income veterans and their surviving families could be affected by a default.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Leaders discuss sustainable finance and green investment | India News – The Times of India

Published

on

Leaders discuss sustainable finance and green investment | India News – The Times of India

Industry leaders, policymakers, and financial institutions gathered to discuss sustainable finance and investment strategies aimed at integrating environmental considerations into economic decision-making. The discussions, held at AFAI national summit and Indian climate leader awards 2025, focused on improving access to green finance, strengthening regulatory frameworks, and fostering private sector participation in sustainable projects.
Speakers included Vivek Kumar Dewangan (CMD, REC Ltd.), Dr Padmanabhan Raja Jaishankar (MD, IIFCL), Sudhendu J Sinha (Advisor, NITI Aayog), and other industry leaders. They stressed the need for green bonds and credit enhancements to support low-impact infrastructure projects.
Panelists highlighted the role of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) in funding sustainable projects. While the government is the main source of green financing, they emphasized the need for more private investment for long-term sustainability.
Experts also called for businesses to follow environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards to ensure transparency in green investments.

Continue Reading

Finance

The Home Equity Partners Completes First Round of Financing

Published

on

The Home Equity Partners Completes First Round of Financing

“Funding will introduce a new equity solution for homeowners that want to unlock equity in their homes.”

TORONTO, March 6, 2025 /CNW/ – The Home Equity Partners (HEQ), a Toronto-based financial solutions provider, has successfully completed its first round of financing. This milestone marks HEQ’s official debut, allowing the company to help homeowners across the Greater Toronto Area access their home equity without taking on new debt.

Unlock your home’s value with a home equity sharing agreement. No monthly payments, no interest charges, no surprises. (CNW Group/The Home Equity Partners)

HEQ specializes in Home Equity Sharing Agreements (HESA)—an innovative solution that enables homeowners to unlock a portion of their home equity without monthly payments or interest charges. A proven model in the United States since the early 2000s, a HESA provides homeowners with immediate financial flexibility by exchanging a share of their property’s future change in value for upfront cash.

“Rising property taxes, increasing cost-of-living pressures, and stagnant wage growth have made it harder for families to stay ahead financially,” said Shael Weinreb, CEO and Founder of The Home Equity Partners. “This financing round allows us to introduce HESA financing, giving Canadian homeowners a debt-free way to access their home equity. We look forward to educating homeowners, addressing growing demand, and building strategic partnerships to maximize our impact.”

Since its inception, HEQ has built a strong pipeline of interested homeowners, demonstrating a significant demand for alternative financial solutions. By offering a debt-free way to tap into home equity, a HESA empowers homeowners to consolidate high-interest debt, fund home renovations, provide a post-secondary education for a child or grandchild, start a business or achieve other financial goals.

Advertisement

Opportunities for Collaboration

  • For Strategic Partners: HEQ is seeking collaborations with real estate professionals, investors, and home improvement companies to expand its impact.

  • For Homeowners: To learn more about HESA and how The Home Equity Partners can help you unlock your home equity, visit The Home Equity Partners to register today or contact info@theheqpartners.com

About The Home Equity Partners

The Home Equity Partners is a Toronto-based financial solutions company dedicated to helping homeowners access their home equity with transparency and flexibility. Through its signature Home Equity Sharing Agreement (HESA), HEQ provides homeowners with a unique opportunity to achieve their financial goals while securing a brighter, debt-free future.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Gender bias in access to finance and implications for capital misallocation

Published

on

Access to finance is essential for firm growth, yet women-led businesses often face significant barriers. Both demand-side barriers, such as social and cultural norms affecting female entrepreneurs’ ability to apply for credit, and supply-side barriers, including loan officers’ implicit biases against women, contribute to these gender gaps (Asiedu et al. 2013, Alesina et al. 2013). Additionally, contextual factors such as regulatory and legal restrictions, social perceptions, and gender-based violence further constrain the growth of women-led firms (Ubfal 2023). This column summarises the findings of our recent paper (Grover and Viollaz 2025) that systematically documents the financial constraints faced by women-managed firms and their broader implications for capital misallocation.

Using micro-data from the World Bank Enterprise Surveys (2008–2023) covering 61 countries, our analysis examines formal firms with at least five employees, focusing on both extensive and intensive margins of credit access. Countries are classified as ‘more traditional’ or ‘less traditional’ based on social perceptions about women’s roles from the World Values Survey. Specifically, countries where more adults agree that “[w]hen jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women” are deemed more traditional.

Gender differences in opportunities and constraints breed inequalities, which have significant implications for allocative efficiency (Pan et al. 2025), capital misallocation (Morazzoni and Sy 2022, Ranasinghe 2024), and aggregate productivity (Goldberg and Chiplunker 2021). Following this literature, we construct two empirical indicators of capital misallocation – average return to capital and a measure based on the marginal revenue product of capital – to help assess whether women-led firms operate with sub-optimal levels of capital compared to their male counterparts.

There are no gender gaps in financial access on the extensive margin

Women-managed formal firms do not face credit constraints on the extensive margin, as they are equally likely to apply for credit and are 5 percentage points less likely to have their applications rejected compared to firms mamanged by men (Panel A of Figure 1). This lack of a gender gap in the likelihood of applying for credit holds across different social and cultural norms. However, in traditional countries, women-led firms are 12 percentage points less likely to face credit application rejection.

Prima facie, this is a surprising finding. However, this may be the result of a stronger selection process, where only the most capable women in traditional countries become managers of formal firms. This aligns with the findings of Morazzoni and Sy (2022) for the US, who show that only the most capable women enter entrepreneurship.

Advertisement

Figure 1 Gender gaps in financial access

Notes: Panel A shows the estimated gender gap in credit application and credit rejection in percentage points, while Panel B shows the gender gap in the amount of debt in percentages. Dark colours reflect results that are statistically significant at the 10% or lower level; light colours, those that are not.

Gender gaps in financial access are significant on the intensive margin, especially in countries with stringent social norms

Women-managed firms are credit-constrained on the intensive margin, receiving 39% lower loan amounts than firms managed by men, conditional on credit applications being approved (Panel B of Figure 1). In traditional countries with stricter social and cultural norms, this gender gap increases to 54%, while in less traditional countries, the gap is 32%. Cultural barriers, including explicit discrimination in credit allocation and implicit biases that demand additional guarantors (e.g. Brock and De Haas 2023) or limit access to information and networks, may explain these results.

These differences are not explained by underlying performance metrics or risk profile

This disparity in the amount of credit received is not explained by gender differences in firms’ risk profiles, profitability, or productivity. In fact, women-managed firms are, on average, more profitable than those managed by men, which may help explain the lower credit-application rejection rates for women-managed firms (Figure 2). Women-managed firms do have lower sales per worker, thereby suggesting higher friction in accessing product and labour markets for better firm-to-worker matches.

Figure 2 Gender gaps in risk appetite and performance

Notes: Estimated gender gaps in leverage and profits-to-revenue ratio, in standard deviations from each country’s mean value. Estimated gender gap in sales per worker in percentages. Dark colours reflect results that are statistically significant at the 10% or lower level; light colours, those that are not.

Gender gaps in credit may breed capital misallocation

Despite women-managed firms being comparably risky and productive and, in fact, more profitable than their counterparts managed by men, they operate with lower credit levels, indicating potential sub-optimal credit allocation. While our data do not allow us to precisely identify the source of sub-optimal credit allocation, they suggest a potential misallocation of capital, particularly when considering the higher profitability of firms managed by females compared to male-managed firms.

Advertisement

We examine empirical indicators of capital misallocation to test whether accessing lower amounts of credit has an impact on the allocation of resources between firms managed by women and men. Our results show that women-managed firms have a 14.7% higher average return to capital, an empirical measure of capital misallocation (Figure 3). By comparison, Morazzoni and Sy (2022) estimate this difference to be 12% for the US.

Figure 3 Gender gaps in capital misallocation

Notes: The figure shows the estimated gender gap in the average return to capital in percentages. Dark colours reflect results that are statistically significant at the 10% or lower level; light colours, those that are not.

The gender difference in the average return to capital is heightened in more traditional countries, where women-managed firms have a 29.6% higher return to capital compared firms managed by men. Our findings may be interpreted as a sign of capital misallocation; that is, women-managed firms could potentially benefit from increased levels of capital to align their relative returns with those of firms managed by men.

If discrimination on the intensive margin partly explains the extent of capital misallocation, then the difference in the empirical indicator would be stronger for firms that receive credit. In fact, this appears to be particularly true for traditional countries (Figure 3). We show that being able to borrow more could relax the credit constraint of firms and reduce capital misallocation for women-managed firms in more traditional countries.

Discussion

Our results show that women-led firms are not any less profitable or riskier than firms managed by men and yet are discriminated in allocation to credit. Policy options to address these disparities include blended finance solutions that mitigate inequalities in lending to female entrepreneurs (Aydin et al. 2024), gender-inclusive financial products, enhanced market access for women entrepreneurs, and fair lending practices. Legal and regulatory reforms that address the barriers women entrepreneurs face are also crucial. Fostering an inclusive financial environment can unlock the full potential of women-led firms, contributing to more efficient resource allocation.

Advertisement

Editors’ note: This column is published in collaboration with the International Economic Associations’ Women in Leadership in Economics initiative, which aims to enhance the role of women in economics through research, building partnerships, and amplifying voices.

References

Alesina, A, F Lotti, and P Mistrulli (2013), “Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy”, Journal of the European Economic Association 11: 45–66.

Asiedu, E, I Kalonda-Kanyama, N Leonce, and A Nti-Addae (2013), “Access to credit by firms in sub-Saharan Africa: How relevant is gender?”, American Economic Review 103: 293–97.

Aydin, H I, C Bircan, and R De Haas (2024), “Blended finance and female entrepreneurs”, VoxEU.org, 30 January.

Brock, J M, and R De Haas (2023), “Discriminatory lending: Evidence from bankers in the lab”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 15: 31–68.

Advertisement

Goldberg, P, and G Chiplunkar (2021), “Aggregate implications of barriers to female entrepreneurship”, VoxEU.org, 19 April.

Grover, A, and M Viollaz (2025), “The gendered impact of social norms on financial access and capital misallocation”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 11041.

Morazzoni, M, and A Sy (2022), “Female entrepreneurship, financial frictions and capital misallocation in the US”, Journal of Monetary Economics 129: 93–118.

Pan, J, C Olivetti, and B Petrangolo (2025), “The evolution of gender in the labour market”, VoxEU.org, 20 January.

Ranasinghe, A (2024), “Misallocation across establishment gender”, Journal of Comparative Economics.

Advertisement

Ubfal, D J (2023), “What works in supporting women-led businesses?”, World Bank Gender Thematic Policy Notes Series: Evidence and Practice Note.

Continue Reading

Trending