Connect with us

Education

Opinion | There’s Still One Big Trick for Getting Into an Elite College

Published

on

Opinion | There’s Still One Big Trick for Getting Into an Elite College

Each American excessive schooler is aware of the supposed secret to a lifetime of success: admission to an elite college. Competitors for coveted spots is so fierce that whereas an admission victory can’t be assured, it may be gamed, if you know the way to play. ‌

It labored for me: I attend a prestigious college, Stanford, which accepted fewer than 4 % of candidates final yr. There, over 1 / 4 of the present undergraduate inhabitants got here from non-public faculties, although solely 14 % of U.S. excessive schoolers attend one. The numbers are reportedly related at most Ivy League universities. Harvard is likely one of the worst of them: A survey of its class of 2019 noticed 35 % of respondents hail from non-public faculties.

A few of these college students presumably attended parochial faculties. Nevertheless, lots of my friends and I attended elite non-public faculties: nationally ranked overachiever factories designed to churn out catnip for faculty admission places of work.

These faculties are so efficient at influencing the admission course of that they additional benefit our society’s privileged few and go away everybody else free to consider that solely probably the most completed, most good college students get into prestigious universities. The concept that admission to probably the most selective schools and universities is predicated on benefit presumes {that a} quick monitor to consolation, standing and wealth doesn’t exist. However that’s simply an phantasm.

I grew up within the Bay Space, the place, in keeping with an evaluation by Area of interest, a college score database, non-public excessive faculties outrank even the state’s best public faculties. Area of interest compiles knowledge from the Division of Schooling, the Census Bureau and opinions from college students, mother and father and academics to find out college rankings. Entry to the excessive faculties it places on the high of its record typically comes with a college-size price ticket. In the US, the common non-public highschool prices $16,040 a yr, and tuition at the very best ones typically exceeds $50,000.

Advertisement

(There is no such thing as a federal pupil support program for highschool; faculties can provide monetary support, however many households pay sticker worth.)

Given rising tuition prices, the variety of middle-income households that ship their kids to non-public faculties has declined for the reason that Nineteen Sixties, whereas the variety of college students from high-income households has stayed comparatively fixed.

States like Massachusetts and New York, which have high-ranking non-public faculties, additionally provide top-notch public choices; non-public faculties working there should show their worth in a aggressive market. However in California, a few of the finest non-public excessive faculties within the nation compete in a state the place public ones rank within the backside half of the nation. Personal excessive faculties assist the wealthy insulate their kids and supply them with the very best secondary schooling doable — whereas everybody else struggles to maintain up.

Pursuing the very best secondary schooling accessible has an apparent goal: getting right into a prestigious college. Personal excessive faculties brazenly market themselves on this aim; many high faculties’ web sites boast school matriculation lists that present dozens of alumni at the very best universities within the nation. I’m sure that my highschool’s obsessive concentrate on educational success derived, on some degree, from the necessity to inform potential mother and father that yet one more senior obtained into Stanford that yr.

Even the construction of those faculties appears designed to service the school admission course of. They typically bestow entry to extra superior courses than a typical college and provide a wealth of extracurriculars. At my highschool, a membership interval was‌ even constructed into ‌our class schedule in order that robotics or mannequin United Nations might meet in the course of the college day, presumably to assist burnish the actions part of our Widespread Utility. After college, we had time to tack on much more actions, like sports activities follow and theater rehearsal.

Advertisement

The place I grew up, attending a non-public college was more likely to facilitate a big bump in check scores. College students at non-public faculties in my space will probably rating 33 or 34 on their ACTs (out of a doable 36), versus high public college college students’ 31 or 32. On the high of the pecking order, that slight improve may help snag an acceptance from a college like Stanford or Harvard. In any case, elite universities are alleged to search for perfection — or three factors from it.

However wanting good on paper is however one drop within the inscrutable bucket we name school admissions.

Counselors at elite non-public excessive faculties have behind-the-scenes entry to demystify admissions for his or her college students. After I was deferred from a college I utilized to early motion, I used to be instructed that my highschool counselor referred to as the admission officer on the school to ask why, and the individual merely responded that I ought to hold my A in honors calculus, implying that if I did, I’d get in throughout common resolution.

These counselors continuously ring elite universities’ admission places of work to make the case for his or her favourite college students. In 2020, Swarthmore School ended this follow after it discovered that over 90 % of counselors calling represented non-public excessive faculties. College students at non-public faculties have private connections with their counselors, who typically in flip have the ears of admission officers at elite universities throughout the nation.

Personal excessive faculties systematize the creation of the consummate school applicant. When the American academic panorama is so clearly a pay-to-win sport, how can we dare to name it a meritocracy?

Advertisement

Admitting a excessive proportion of personal college college students serves elite universities’ pursuits. Throughout and after school, graduates from non-public faculties are more likely to outperform their public college friends. For instance, in 2020, The Each day Princetonian reported, two-thirds of Princeton’s American Rhodes students attended non-public excessive faculties, and the Affiliation of Boarding Colleges bragged in 2010 that its alumni are “3,000 % extra probably” to grow to be Rhodes students than the common pupil. Prestigious postgraduate scholarships — or fancy postgraduation jobs — may help make a university extra engaging to its deep-pocketed alumni and the following crop of potential college students.

On high of that, these distinctive college students are sometimes extra more likely to pay full tuition. When schools see non-public college college students, they absolutely see high-performing baggage of cash with check scores that can bump these candy, candy U.S. Information and World Report rankings.

Personal excessive faculties operate to perpetuate cycles of privilege. Additionally they work. In the event you had the monetary assets, would you deny your children the schooling and alternatives that personal excessive faculties may give them?

“Don’t complain; you bought into Stanford” resounds in my head any time I replicate on my highschool expertise. I’m, in spite of everything, an instance of the scholar these non-public faculties try to create: a excessive achiever at an elite college with a paralyzing concern of failure.

However after I look again, my highschool’s tradition of feat was actually extra a endless competitors created by the distinguished universities that reap the rewards from it, the directors who facilitate it and the mother and father who fund it.

Advertisement

The pursuit of status — in highschool, school and past, eternally and at all times — makes college students like me willfully ignore the psychological and bodily toll that every step of our “meritocracy” exacts. In any case, we’ve earned it.

Sophie Callcott is a junior at Stanford College, the place she research historical past. She has written about schooling for The Stanford Each day, a pupil newspaper there.

The Instances is dedicated to publishing a range of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed here are some suggestions. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.

Observe The New York Instances Opinion part on Fb, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Video: Johnson Condemns Pro-Palestinian Protests at Columbia University

Published

on

Video: Johnson Condemns Pro-Palestinian Protests at Columbia University

new video loaded: Johnson Condemns Pro-Palestinian Protests at Columbia University

transcript

transcript

Johnson Condemns Pro-Palestinian Protests at Columbia University

House Speaker Mike Johnson delivered brief remarks at Columbia University on Wednesday, demanding White House action and invoking the possibility of bringing in the National Guard to quell the pro-Palestinian protests. Students interrupted his speech with jeers.

“A growing number of students have chanted in support of terrorists. They have chased down Jewish students. They have mocked them and reviled them. They have shouted racial epithets. They have screamed at those who bear the Star of David.” [Crowd chanting] “We can’t hear you.” [clapping] We can’t hear you.” “Enjoy your free speech. My message to the students inside the encampment is get — go back to class and stop the nonsense. My intention is to call President Biden after we leave here and share with him what we have seen with our own two eyes and demand that he take action. There is executive authority that would be appropriate. If this is not contained quickly, and if these threats and intimidation are not stopped, there is an appropriate time for the National Guard. We have to bring order to these campuses. We cannot allow this to happen around the country.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in U.S. & Politics

Continue Reading

Education

Video: Dozens of Yale Students Arrested as Campus Protests Spread

Published

on

Video: Dozens of Yale Students Arrested as Campus Protests Spread

new video loaded: Dozens of Yale Students Arrested as Campus Protests Spread

transcript

transcript

Dozens of Yale Students Arrested as Campus Protests Spread

The police arrested students at a pro-Palestinian protest encampment at Yale University, days after more than 100 student demonstrators were arrested on the campus of Columbia University.

Crowd: “Free, free Palestine.” [chanting] “We will not stop, we will not rest. Disclose, divest.” “We will not stop, we will not rest. Disclose, divest.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Israel-Hamas War

Continue Reading

Education

​Why School Absences Have ‘Exploded’ Almost Everywhere

Published

on

​Why School Absences Have ‘Exploded’ Almost Everywhere

In Anchorage, affluent families set off on ski trips and other lengthy vacations, with the assumption that their children can keep up with schoolwork online.

In a working-class pocket of Michigan, school administrators have tried almost everything, including pajama day, to boost student attendance.

And across the country, students with heightened anxiety are opting to stay home rather than face the classroom.

In the four years since the pandemic closed schools, U.S. education has struggled to recover on a number of fronts, from learning loss, to enrollment, to student behavior.

But perhaps no issue has been as stubborn and pervasive as a sharp increase in student absenteeism, a problem that cuts across demographics and has continued long after schools reopened.

Advertisement

Nationally, an estimated 26 percent of public school students were considered chronically absent last school year, up from 15 percent before the pandemic, according to the most recent data, from 40 states and Washington, D.C., compiled by the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute. Chronic absence is typically defined as missing at least 10 percent of the school year, or about 18 days, for any reason.

Increase in chronic absenteeism, 2019–23

By local child poverty rates

By length of school closures

Advertisement

By district racial makeup

Source: Upshot analysis of data from Nat Malkus, American Enterprise Institute. Districts are grouped into highest, middle and lowest third.

Advertisement

The increases have occurred in districts big and small, and across income and race. For districts in wealthier areas, chronic absenteeism rates have about doubled, to 19 percent in the 2022-23 school year from 10 percent before the pandemic, a New York Times analysis of the data found.

Poor communities, which started with elevated rates of student absenteeism, are facing an even bigger crisis: Around 32 percent of students in the poorest districts were chronically absent in the 2022-23 school year, up from 19 percent before the pandemic.

Even districts that reopened quickly during the pandemic, in fall 2020, have seen vast increases.

“The problem got worse for everybody in the same proportional way,” said Nat Malkus, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, who collected and studied the data.

Advertisement

Victoria, Texas reopened schools in August 2020, earlier than many other districts. Even so, student absenteeism in the district has doubled.

Kaylee Greenlee for The New York Times

The trends suggest that something fundamental has shifted in American childhood and the culture of school, in ways that may be long lasting. What was once a deeply ingrained habit — wake up, catch the bus, report to class — is now something far more tenuous.

“Our relationship with school became optional,” said Katie Rosanbalm, a psychologist and associate research professor with the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University.

Advertisement

The habit of daily attendance — and many families’ trust — was severed when schools shuttered in spring 2020. Even after schools reopened, things hardly snapped back to normal. Districts offered remote options, required Covid-19 quarantines and relaxed policies around attendance and grading.

Today, student absenteeism is a leading factor hindering the nation’s recovery from pandemic learning losses, educational experts say. Students can’t learn if they aren’t in school. And a rotating cast of absent classmates can negatively affect the achievement of even students who do show up, because teachers must slow down and adjust their approach to keep everyone on track.

“If we don’t address the absenteeism, then all is naught,” said Adam Clark, the superintendent of Mt. Diablo Unified, a socioeconomically and racially diverse district of 29,000 students in Northern California, where he said absenteeism has “exploded” to about 25 percent of students. That’s up from 12 percent before the pandemic.

U.S. students, overall, are not caught up from their pandemic losses. Absenteeism is one key reason.

Kaylee Greenlee for The New York Times

Advertisement

Why Students Are Missing School

Schools everywhere are scrambling to improve attendance, but the new calculus among families is complex and multifaceted.

At South Anchorage High School in Anchorage, where students are largely white and middle-to-upper income, some families now go on ski trips during the school year, or take advantage of off-peak travel deals to vacation for two weeks in Hawaii, said Sara Miller, a counselor at the school.

For a smaller number of students at the school who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, the reasons are different, and more intractable. They often have to stay home to care for younger siblings, Ms. Miller said. On days they miss the bus, their parents are busy working or do not have a car to take them to school.

And because teachers are still expected to post class work online, often nothing more than a skeleton version of an assignment, families incorrectly think students are keeping up, Ms. Miller said.

Advertisement

Sara Miller, a counselor at South Anchorage High School for 20 years, now sees more absences from students across the socioeconomic spectrum.

Ash Adams for The New York Times

Across the country, students are staying home when sick, not only with Covid-19, but also with more routine colds and viruses.

And more students are struggling with their mental health, one reason for increased absenteeism in Mason, Ohio, an affluent suburb of Cincinnati, said Tracey Carson, a district spokeswoman. Because many parents can work remotely, their children can also stay home.

Advertisement

For Ashley Cooper, 31, of San Marcos, Texas, the pandemic fractured her trust in an education system that she said left her daughter to learn online, with little support, and then expected her to perform on grade level upon her return. Her daughter, who fell behind in math, has struggled with anxiety ever since, she said.

“There have been days where she’s been absolutely in tears — ‘Can’t do it. Mom, I don’t want to go,’” said Ms. Cooper, who has worked with the nonprofit Communities in Schools to improve her children’s school attendance. But she added, “as a mom, I feel like it’s OK to have a mental health day, to say, ‘I hear you and I listen. You are important.’”

Experts say missing school is both a symptom of pandemic-related challenges, and also a cause. Students who are behind academically may not want to attend, but being absent sets them further back. Anxious students may avoid school, but hiding out can fuel their anxiety.

And schools have also seen a rise in discipline problems since the pandemic, an issue intertwined with absenteeism.

Dr. Rosanbalm, the Duke psychologist, said both absenteeism and behavioral outbursts are examples of the human stress response, now playing out en masse in schools: fight (verbal or physical aggression) or flight (absenteeism).

Advertisement

“If kids are not here, they are not forming relationships,” said Quintin Shepherd, the superintendent in Victoria, Texas.

Kaylee Greenlee for The New York Times

Quintin Shepherd, the superintendent in Victoria, Texas, first put his focus on student behavior, which he described as a “fire in the kitchen” after schools reopened in August 2020.

The district, which serves a mostly low-income and Hispanic student body of around 13,000, found success with a one-on-one coaching program that teaches coping strategies to the most disruptive students. In some cases, students went from having 20 classroom outbursts per year to fewer than five, Dr. Shepherd said.

Advertisement

But chronic absenteeism is yet to be conquered. About 30 percent of students are chronically absent this year, roughly double the rate before the pandemic.

Dr. Shepherd, who originally hoped student absenteeism would improve naturally with time, has begun to think that it is, in fact, at the root of many issues.

“If kids are not here, they are not forming relationships,” he said. “If they are not forming relationships, we should expect there will be behavior and discipline issues. If they are not here, they will not be academically learning and they will struggle. If they struggle with their coursework, you can expect violent behaviors.”

Teacher absences have also increased since the pandemic, and student absences mean less certainty about which friends and classmates will be there. That can lead to more absenteeism, said Michael A. Gottfried, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education. His research has found that when 10 percent of a student’s classmates are absent on a given day, that student is more likely to be absent the following day.

Absent classmates can have a negative impact on the achievement and attendance of even the students who do show up.

Advertisement

Ash Adams for The New York Times

Is This the New Normal?

In many ways, the challenge facing schools is one felt more broadly in American society: Have the cultural shifts from the pandemic become permanent?

In the work force, U.S. employees are still working from home at a rate that has remained largely unchanged since late 2022. Companies have managed to “put the genie back in the bottle” to some extent by requiring a return to office a few days a week, said Nicholas Bloom, an economist at Stanford University who studies remote work. But hybrid office culture, he said, appears here to stay.

Some wonder whether it is time for schools to be more pragmatic.

Advertisement

Lakisha Young, the chief executive of the Oakland REACH, a parent advocacy group that works with low-income families in California, suggested a rigorous online option that students could use in emergencies, such as when a student misses the bus or has to care for a family member. “The goal should be, how do I ensure this kid is educated?” she said.

Relationships with adults at school and other classmates are crucial for attendance.

Kaylee Greenlee for The New York Times

In the corporate world, companies have found some success appealing to a sense of social responsibility, where colleagues rely on each other to show up on the agreed-upon days.

Advertisement

A similar dynamic may be at play in schools, where experts say strong relationships are critical for attendance.

There is a sense of: “If I don’t show up, would people even miss the fact that I’m not there?” said Charlene M. Russell-Tucker, the commissioner of education in Connecticut.

In her state, a home visit program has yielded positive results, in part by working with families to address the specific reasons a student is missing school, but also by establishing a relationship with a caring adult. Other efforts — such as sending text messages or postcards to parents informing them of the number of accumulated absences — can also be effective.

Regina Murff has worked to re-establish the daily habit of school attendance for her sons, who are 6 and 12.

Sylvia Jarrus for The New York Times

Advertisement

In Ypsilanti, Mich., outside of Ann Arbor, a home visit helped Regina Murff, 44, feel less alone when she was struggling to get her children to school each morning.

After working at a nursing home during the pandemic, and later losing her sister to Covid-19, she said, there were days she found it difficult to get out of bed. Ms. Murff was also more willing to keep her children home when they were sick, for fear of accidentally spreading the virus.

But after a visit from her school district, and starting therapy herself, she has settled into a new routine. She helps her sons, 6 and 12, set out their outfits at night and she wakes up at 6 a.m. to ensure they get on the bus. If they are sick, she said, she knows to call the absence into school. “I’ve done a huge turnaround in my life,” she said.

But bringing about meaningful change for large numbers of students remains slow, difficult work.

Advertisement

Nationally, about 26 percent of students were considered chronically absent last school year, up from 15 percent before the pandemic.

Kaylee Greenlee for The New York Times

The Ypsilanti school district has tried a bit of everything, said the superintendent, Alena Zachery-Ross. In addition to door knocks, officials are looking for ways to make school more appealing for the district’s 3,800 students, including more than 80 percent who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. They held themed dress-up days — ’70s day, pajama day — and gave away warm clothes after noticing a dip in attendance during winter months.

“We wondered, is it because you don’t have a coat, you don’t have boots?” said Dr. Zachery-Ross.

Advertisement

Still, absenteeism overall remains higher than it was before the pandemic. “We haven’t seen an answer,” she said.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending