Connect with us

World

Scandals risk shattering people’s trust in the EU, warns Ombudsman

Published

on

Scandals risk shattering people’s trust in the EU, warns Ombudsman

The mounting political scandal besieging the European Union threat having a “shattering impact” on how folks understand and belief the whole challenge of European integration, Emily O’Reilly has warned.

“You can not have political legitimacy with out ethical authority. You may’t have political legitimacy both except the folks (have) belief in you,” the European Ombudsman informed Euronews.

“Brussels, for most individuals, is an concept. And it is an concept that may be very far-off,” she went on.

“They’re virtually predestined to mistrust it as a result of they do not perceive it. So, due to this fact, it is fairly fragile the belief that there could be between the European Union and its residents. And due to this fact, when the EU does issues which injury that belief, it could possibly have virtually a shattering impact on folks’s perception within the EU.”

In current months Brussels has been on the centre of an unusually massive variety of controversies which have attracted quite a lot of criticism and scrutiny over how European policymakers conduct their each day work.

Advertisement

The scandals embrace the unreleased textual content messages between European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla round vaccine procurement, the free flights paid by Qatar to a prime EU official, a backroom deal to nominate the European Parliament’s secretary normal and the revolving doorways uncovered by an aggressive lobbying marketing campaign by Uber.

As the primary workplace in command of investigating maladministration circumstances throughout the EU establishments, the European Ombudsman has change into concerned in all these polemics, pointing the finger on the wrongdoing, requesting clarifications and issuing suggestions.

“You need to draw the dots between the small little incidents that you just may not suppose are notably necessary and the larger image – the way in which that they result in or can result in mistrust by the residents on the whole European Union challenge,” O’Reilly informed Euronews.

“It is also utilized by people who find themselves sceptical of the EU and people who find themselves hostile to the EU,” she added.

“It is crucial that the EU acts to the very best doable moral requirements as a way to shield its political legitimacy.”

Advertisement

Among the many myriad of headlines, no different scandal has captured extra consideration and censure than the European Parliament’s corruption scandal.

The intricate saga focuses on a cash-for-favours scheme that allegedly noticed Qatar and Morocco pay massive sums of cash and substantial presents to lawmakers in an try and affect the decision-making course of contained in the hemicycle.

Each nations deny any wrongdoing.

5 people, together with two sitting MEPs, have been criminally charged as a part of the continuing investigation. A 3rd lawmaker is preventing extradition from Italy to Belgium.

Over €1.5 million in money have been seized by the Belgian police throughout dozens of residence and workplace searches, along with the requisitioning of parliamentary computer systems to forestall the erasure of key information.

Advertisement

“The graphics have been fairly dramatic. We noticed actually euro notes, we noticed suitcases. So all people’s type of cartoon-like concept of corruption was served as much as them,” O’Reilly stated when requested in regards to the so-called Qatargate.

The Ombudsman, nonetheless, didn’t look like notably stunned in regards to the alleged money exchanges. In her view, the anti-corruption guidelines put in place by the European Parliament are “not likely enforced and monitored,” opening up a loophole that may make misdeeds simpler to hide.

“I suppose, in a method, this was a type of a scandal or an accident ready to occur,” she famous.

Within the instant aftermath of the scandal, European Parliament President Roberta Metsola put ahead a sequence of measures to crack down on misconduct, reminiscent of new guidelines of entry to parliamentary premises and extra detailed declarations on conflicts of pursuits.

Because the reforms aren’t but ultimate, O’Reilly averted drawing any clear-cut conclusions however stated her workplace had given concepts to Metsola’s workplace on find out how to design a “good ethics framework.”

Advertisement

“Issues are inclined to occur very quick and fairly dramatically when there is a scandal,” O’Reilly stated.

“Every part goes alongside at a sure complacent vary for a lot of, a few years, even a long time. After which there is a scandal and out of the blue all people desires to do one thing to repair this factor, though it has been in plain sight for fairly some time.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Trial Starts for Nicolas Sarkozy in Libya Election Case

Published

on

Trial Starts for Nicolas Sarkozy in Libya Election Case

Former President Nicolas Sarkozy of France on Monday went on trial in Paris over accusations that his 2007 campaign received illegal financing from the Libyan government of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

The trial, which is scheduled to last three months, is far from the first for Mr. Sarkozy, 69, a conservative politician who led France from 2007 to 2012, but it represents one of the most serious legal threats to the French politician since he left office.

Just last month, Mr. Sarkozy exhausted his final appeal in a separate corruption and influence peddling case, making him the first former French president sentenced to actual detention, though he will serve his time under house arrest with an electronic bracelet.

But of all the legal cases against Mr. Sarkozy, the Libya one is among the most sprawling, convoluted and explosive. It involves accusations that his campaign illegally accepted vast sums of money from Colonel Qaddafi, the former Libyan strongman who was killed by opposition fighters in 2011.

Mr. Sarkozy, who arrived in court without making any comments, has denied wrongdoing. He could face up to 10 years in prison and be fined nearly $400,000.

Advertisement

Here is what you need to know about the case.

Mr. Sarkozy is facing charges of illegal campaign financing, criminal conspiracy, concealing the misappropriation of public funds and passive corruption (a charge that applies to people suspected of receiving money or favors).

The case against him involves a complex web of political and financial ties between Mr. Sarkozy’s advisers, officials who were part of Colonel Qaddafi’s government, and businessmen or bankers who acted as intermediaries.

Twelve other people were also ordered to stand trial on similar corruption, embezzlement or illegal campaign financing charges.

“Our thesis is that of a corruption pact,” Jean-François Bohnert, France’s top financial prosecutor, told RMC radio on Monday.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say that Mr. Sarkozy and his allies sought financing from Libya, in violation of election funding rules, and that the Libyan government promised to provide it. In return, they said, it wanted economic deals, diplomatic recognition and possibly assistance from France in rescinding an arrest warrant against a top Libyan official.

Mr. Sarkozy visited Libya shortly after he was elected, then welcomed Colonel Qaddafi for a widely-criticized state visit in Paris, where the Libyan strongman memorably pitched his Bedouin-style tent.

In 2011, as Libya was roiled by fighting between the army and rebels, Colonel Qaddafi and his son said in media interviews that Mr. Sarkozy’s 2007 presidential campaign had taken Libyan money.

Then, in 2012, the investigative news website Mediapart published a document, presented as a note by Libya’s secret services, that mentioned a deal to fund Mr. Sarkozy’s campaign with up to 50 million euros, or about $52 million. That same year, as part of a separate investigation, Ziad Takieddine, a French-Lebanese businessman, made a similar allegation.

In 2013, prosecutors opened an investigation. It lasted a decade and involvedover 20 countries, 50 police raids and 70 volumes of case files.

Advertisement

Mr. Sarkozy has repeatedly and strenuously denied the accusations, which he argues were driven mostly by allies of Colonel Qaddafi seeking revenge.

Under Mr. Sarkozy’s leadership, France played a prominent role in the NATO-led campaign of airstrikes that ultimately led to the toppling of Colonel Qaddafi and his death at the hands of Libyan rebels.

There have been conflicting accounts about the sequence of events and the amounts of money involved, and some of the defendants have shifted their versions of what happened.

Some Libyan officials have even denied that Mr. Sarkozy’s campaign received any funding, and Mr. Sarkozy’s legal team has seized on the vagaries of the case.

“We don’t even have the amount of this alleged illegal financing,” Christophe Ingrain, Mr. Sarkozy’s lawyer, told RTL radio on Sunday. “Sometimes it’s in euros, sometimes in dollars, sometimes in dinars, sometimes 2 million, 3 million, 50 million, 400 million. This isn’t serious.”

Advertisement

Mr. Sarkozy’s official records for the 2007 campaign indicated that he spent over €21 million, and any illicit financing from Libya would have enabled him to skirt France’s strict spending cap for presidential campaigns. Prosecutors have not clearly laid out how much Libya actually sent or how much they believe was actually spent on the campaign. But under French law, prosecutors do not have to prove that a corrupt deal was carried out to secure a conviction — only that one was agreed upon.

Mr. Sarkozy no longer holds public office. But his memoirs are best-sellers, he is still popular with the base of his conservative party and he retains some political influence.

Yes, twice. Mr. Sarkozy has faced multiple accusations of financial impropriety since he left office.

In 2021, he became the first former president in France’s recent history to be sentenced to actual detention after he was convicted of trying to obtain information from a judge about a court case against him.

Mr. Sarkozy has exhausted his appeal options in that case, but he will not be incarcerated. Instead, he will serve one year under house arrest with an electronic bracelet, although a judge has not yet ruled on the practical details.

Advertisement

Mr. Sarkozy was also convicted in 2021 to a year of house arrest for illegally financing his unsuccessful 2012 re-election campaign, which wildly exceeded France’s spending limits. An appeals court last year upheld the conviction but halved his sentence, and that case is still going through the appeals process.

Other cases against Mr. Sarkozy have been dropped, including one in which we was accused of manipulating the heiress to the L’Oréal fortune into financing his 2007 campaign.

And some cases are still being investigated, including an offshoot of the Libya case. In 2023, Mr. Sarkozy was placed under formal investigation on charges of witness tampering, after allegations that his allies pressured Mr. Takieddine, the French-Lebanese businessman, into retracting his accusations.

Continue Reading

World

Nigel Farage responds after Elon Musk declares he 'doesn't have what it takes' to lead Reform UK Party

Published

on

Nigel Farage responds after Elon Musk declares he 'doesn't have what it takes' to lead Reform UK Party

Business tycoon Elon Musk asserted in a post on X that Reform UK Party leader Nigel Farage does not “have what it takes” and should be replaced.

“The Reform Party needs a new leader. Farage doesn’t have what it takes,” Musk declared in a tweet. 

Farage, a member of the UK Parliament, disagreed.

ELON MUSK DEMANDS UK ACT ON GROOMING GANG SCANDAL AMID GROWING CALLS FOR PROBE: ‘NATIONAL INQUIRY NOW!’

Reform UK honorary president Nigel Farage, left, and Elon Musk. (Left: Carl Court/Getty Images; Right: Chesnot/Getty Images)

Advertisement

“Well, this is a surprise! Elon is a remarkable individual but on this I am afraid I disagree. My view remains that Tommy Robinson is not right for Reform and I never sell out my principles,” he tweeted.

Musk has been speaking out in support of Robinson, who is currently imprisoned. 

But Farage has noted that he does not want Robinson to join the Reform UK Party. 

MUSK RENEWS HARSH REBUKE OF DEMS WHO REJECTED DEPORTING SEX OFFENDERS: VOTE OUT ‘EVERY ONE’

Tommy Robinson

Far-right activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson, is seen on April 23, 2024, in London, United Kingdom. (Mark Kerrison/In Pictures via Getty Images)

Farage has said that Robinson is not in prison “for exposing grooming gangs,” but for “contempt of court.” 

Advertisement

“I know he’s in prison for contempt of court ffs, but there is NO justification for such a long prison sentence or for solitary confinement!” Musk wrote in a post on X.

Robinson’s real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, reports indicate.

ELON MUSK SAYS TESLA WILL GET CYBERTRUCK ‘BACK ON THE ROAD’ AFTER LAS VEGAS EXPLOSION

Musk, who strongly supported President-elect Donald Trump during America’s 2024 presidential contest, has claimed that if Trump had not won the election, “civilization would be lost.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Will 2024 fears become reality in 2025?

Published

on

Will 2024 fears become reality in 2025?

Fears and uncertainties of 2024 might come to reality in 2025, with re-election of Donald Trump as US president as a major game changer for Brussels.

ADVERTISEMENT

The first Radio Schuman episode of the new year follows significant uncertainties left behind by 2024 that Europe will have to handle.

The continent is set to experience significant political and policy shifts, with Ursula von der Leyen’s influence growing, the balance of power in the EU potentially changing due to elections in Germany, and global uncertainties like Trump’s re-election affecting relations with Russia and China.

Key policy discussions will include the upcoming EU Multiannual Financial Framework, increased defence spending and ongoing migration reforms. On top of that, there’s also competitiveness, energy security, and tackling budget deficits in EU economies, all up for debate.

Radio Schuman touches upon what’s ahead with Euronews reporter Paula Soler.

We will also explore last week’s presidential election in Croatia and look at the roster and the gameplan of the first MEP delegation of the year as it begins its work abroad.

Advertisement

Finally, are smokes vanishing into thin air only to be replaced with electronic cigarettes? We’ll check out who and how uses vapes — widely popular nicotine devices — across Europe.

Today’s Radio Schuman is hosted by senior policy reporter Gerardo Fortuna and produced by journalist Eleonora Vasques, with audio editing by Georgios Leivaditis. Music by Alexandre Jas.

Continue Reading

Trending