Connect with us

Wyoming

Ban on abortion pills passes Wyoming Senate committee

Published

on

Ban on abortion pills passes Wyoming Senate committee


For the third yr in a row, a ban on medicine abortion has cleared Wyoming’s Senate well being committee.

However whereas earlier variations have died within the Home, the newest tried ban might see a distinct destiny amid the rise of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus and turnover within the Legislature.

The Senate Labor, Well being and Social Providers Committee voted by a 4-1 margin Wednesday to advance a invoice sponsored by Sen. Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, which might outlaw and criminalize the use, manufacture, distribution or prescription of abortion drugs in Wyoming.

Committee chairman Fred Baldwin, R-Kemmerer, was the lone no vote after supporting the identical invoice sponsored by Salazar final yr. Baldwin was additionally the lone dissenter on one other 2021 invoice to ban medicine abortions.

Advertisement

Persons are additionally studying…

Wyoming continues to be in a authorized battle over the state’s abortion ban following Roe’s demise over the summer time. However lawmakers are charging forward with extra laws to limit abortions. 

Advertisement

The invoice would bar the use of mifepristone and misoprostol, the 2 commonest medication utilized in medicine abortions, in addition to mifeprex, mifegyne and another comparable medication that might induce an abortion.

Physicians or others who violate the ban would face a misdemeanor cost and as much as a $9,000 effective and 6 months and jail.

Advertisement

Salazar’s invoice supplies exceptions for rape, incest, “pure miscarriage,” and to guard the life or well being of the mom.

In 2021, Wyoming recorded 98 abortions, 67 of which have been residents, in response to Wyoming Division of Well being knowledge.

All 98 have been “non-surgical medical abortions,” in different phrases, medicine abortions.

Greater than an hour and half of testimony yielded civil debate, with non secular teams and pro-life audio system in favor of the invoice and medical suppliers and reproductive rights advocates opposed.

“The abortion foyer will attempt to use chemical abortion drugs to avoid future abortion bans within the state of Wyoming and this regulation will ever cease that from taking place,” stated Michael Barrow, a Wyoming state motion captain for College students for Lifetime of America.

Advertisement

“We ask you to face for these girls and rise up for them and the youngsters who die from abortion every year in Wyoming,” he stated. “It’s time for our era to set an instance to different states by ending the evil of abortion. And it’s time that we set an instance by defending girls and safeguarding the subsequent era of Wyomingites.”

Bill to restrict use of abortion drugs in Wyoming returns

A invoice to limit the circulation and use of abortion drugs is up for consideration once more this session as Wyoming’s abortion ban continues to be litigated in courtroom. 

Advertisement

The testimony of medical suppliers and reproductive rights advocates was broad however centered on girls’s well being and the rights of moms and households to make their very own well being care choices. Those that testified additionally highlighted the oblique penalties of outlawing the medication.

“If Senate File 109 passes, it will really be a disaster within the follow of obstetrics and gynecology, and this has nothing to do with elective abortion,” stated Dr. Giovannina Anthony, an OB-GYN and abortion supplier in Jackson. “[The bill] does make an exception for administration of miscarriage, however the actuality of banning and criminalizing these medication is they won’t be accessible.”

Anthony objected particularly to the banning of misoprostol, which, along with medicine abortion, is used to induce labor, deal with postpartum hemorrhaging and help with miscarriages.

When requested by Sen. Anthony Bouchard, R-Cheyenne, if she learn the invoice and was conscious that it solely prohibited the medication to be used in abortions, Anthony stated pharmacists conscious of the prison penalties could be hesitant to fill prescriptions for different makes use of even when they’re authorized for worry that they could possibly be utilized in an abortion.

“Don’t you suppose that that might actually present a chilling impact?” she stated.

Advertisement

Previous makes an attempt, new panorama

Salazar introduced the identical invoice banning medicine abortion final yr.

After breezing via the Senate by a 20-10 margin, the Home by no means thought of the invoice and it failed. The identical factor occurred in 2021 throughout Salazar’s first try to outlaw medicine abortion.

The upcoming legislative session will set the stage for 2023 politics

With freshmen lawmakers taking on nearly half of Wyoming’s Home of Representatives, extra senior lawmakers have their work lower out for them to get their colleagues in control. 

Advertisement

Nevertheless, Salazar’s newest strive might be heard amid a drastically totally different panorama each nationally and within the Wyoming Legislature.

The Supreme Court docket’s ruling putting down Roe v. Wade in June paved the way in which for Wyoming’s set off ban – handed a number of months earlier – to enter impact.

Teton County Choose Melissa Owens has since blocked the ban, however the state continues to be awaiting a ruling from Owens that might decide the way forward for abortion within the state, although Owens’ choice will possible be appealed to the Wyoming Supreme Court docket.

On the similar time, the Biden administration has sought to increase entry to the medication utilized in medicine abortions, with the Meals and Drug Administration saying earlier this yr that they could possibly be bought in retail pharmacies with a prescription for the primary time.

Advertisement

CVS and Walgreens have stated that they plan to supply the drugs in states the place abortion is authorized.

Remedy abortions accounted for 53% of abortions within the U.S. 2020, in response to the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive rights analysis and advocacy group.

Rising assist

In contrast to the final two occasions, Salazar has discovered vital assist after turnover following the final election cycle, particularly within the Home.

Steep learning curve ahead for committees with new lawmakers

With a brand new slate of lawmakers, some Legislative committees are going to have a really steep studying curve going into the fast-approaching session. 

Advertisement

Freshman lawmakers account for nearly half of the Home, together with six of the 9 members who serve on the Home Labor, Well being and Social Providers Committee.

13 freshman within the Home have signed on as co-sponsors to the invoice, by themselves doubling the variety of representatives who co-sponsored the ban in 2022.

Greater than a 3rd of the Senate has co-sponsored invoice as effectively.

Advertisement

The strengthening of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, together with the election of Rep. Chip Neiman, R-Hulett, a caucus sympathizer, as majority ground chief, may even possible enhance the ban’s possibilities of passing.

Wyoming Freedom Caucus looks to push Legislature farther to the right

The Wyoming Freedom Caucus introduced its official launch Wednesday, signaling the group’s intention to take a extra aggressive method to selling hard-line conservative laws.

Advertisement

Among the many Freedom Caucus’ priorities is “bolstering Wyoming’s pro-life protections,” in response to the information launch saying the group’s official formation.

However whereas momentum is constructing amongst Wyoming lawmakers for a statewide ban on medicine abortions, suppliers stay agency of their objections.

“I perceive I’ll by no means change the minds of any of you relating to abortion, and I don’t plan to,” stated Dr. Rene Hinkle, an OB-GYN and founding companion on the Cheyenne Ladies’s Clinic. “I’m not pro-abortion. I’ve by no means executed abortions, however I’ve been caring for girls and doing reproductive girls’s well being for over 30 years and abortion is a part of girls’s well being. It’s a well being situation.”

Advertisement



Source link

Wyoming

Wyoming Senate takes step to reduce regulatory barriers to housing developments

Published

on

Wyoming Senate takes step to reduce regulatory barriers to housing developments


CHEYENNE – Communities across the state are lacking in workforce housing, defined as homes affordable to middle-income people. Experts cite many reasons for Wyoming’s housing crisis, and an overregulated environment for builders is among them. In 2023, local residents protested and ultimately derailed a plan by a Cheyenne developer who wanted to build an apartment complex with exercise …



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming and Massachusetts Join Growing List of States Considering Bitcoin Reserves – Decrypt

Published

on

Wyoming and Massachusetts Join Growing List of States Considering Bitcoin Reserves – Decrypt


Wyoming and Massachusetts have joined the expanding number of U.S. states that may soon vote on establishing Bitcoin reserves, with representatives from both states submitting draft legislation supporting the initiative on Friday. 

In Wyoming, a group of five Republican legislators submitted a bill that would permit the state treasurer to invest public funds in Bitcoin, but no other digital assets.

In recent weeks, other states have put forth slightly more permissive bills, which would in some cases allow states to invest in stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies that surpassed $500 billion in market capitalization—though as of this writing, Bitcoin is the only asset that meets that requirement.

Wyoming’s bill is also more restrictive in another regard: It would only permit its treasurer to invest 3% of a given state fund in Bitcoin. Proposed legislation in other states, such as Pennsylvania and Oklahoma, would allow for investments in digital assets to make up 10% of similar public funds. 

Advertisement

Meanwhile, in deep blue Massachusetts, a lone Republican state senator proposed a bill on Friday proposing the establishment of a Bitcoin strategic reserve. That act, submitted by Peter Durant, is more permissive than Wyoming’s, and would allow for up to 10% of Massachusetts’ rainy day fund to be comprised of Bitcoin or any manner of digital asset.  

At this point, nearly one-fifth of all U.S. state legislatures are poised to soon formally weigh whether to invest public funds in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Every such proposal has been submitted in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s re-election in November, by Republicans.

Trump, long a crypto skeptic, abruptly changed tack on the campaign trail this year after being a noted Bitcoin critic in the past. In July, onstage at a Bitcoin conference in Nashville, he called for the federal government to establish its own Bitcoin stockpile

The chorus for such initiatives is rapidly gaining momentum. On Friday afternoon, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong publicly called for the creation of a U.S. Bitcoin strategic reserve for the first time. 

The next global arms race will be in the digital economy, not space,” Armstrong said in a company blog post. “Bitcoin could be as foundational to the global economy as gold and will become central to national security in a world where holdings of Bitcoin can shift the balance of power among nation states.”

Advertisement

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wyoming

Trump's deportation agenda taking hold with Wyoming Legislature, some sheriffs – WyoFile

Published

on

Trump's deportation agenda taking hold with Wyoming Legislature, some sheriffs – WyoFile


CHEYENNE—The Legislature and some sheriffs are simultaneously pursuing programs to align Wyoming with incoming President Donald Trump’s deportation agenda, and make the state an unwelcoming place for people in the country without permission.

House lawmakers aligned with the Wyoming Freedom Caucus have brought bills to punish employers who hire undocumented immigrants and local government officials who fail to cooperate with federal authorities. They also seek to make it illegal for undocumented immigrants to drive in the state, even with a valid license from another state.

Meanwhile, a growing number of sheriffs are pursuing agreements with the federal government to position county jails more firmly in the service of federal immigration enforcement. 

Sheriffs in Laramie, Campbell and Carbon counties recently told WyoFile about discussions with U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials regarding agreements to assist with the deportation of noncitizens arrested for non-immigration offenses. Sweetwater County has had such an agreement in place since 2020. 

Advertisement

All of those counties line either Interstate 80 or Interstate 90. 

Taken together, lawmakers and the sheriffs could make Wyoming hostile territory for people who have entered the country illegally, even if they’re just passing through. If the driver’s license bill becomes law, for example, undocumented immigrants licensed to drive by other states who are traveling through Wyoming could run the risk of being jailed and slated for deportation. 

Gov. Mark Gordon has also touted immigration enforcement, noting in his State of the State address that he deployed a contingent of the Wyoming Highway Patrol to support Texas during its standoff with the federal government this past summer. 

Since then, he said, Texas’ governor sent a detachment of its law enforcement to Wyoming, to talk with local police agencies about “what we need to do in our heartland.” 

Counter lobby

Advocates for the state’s immigrant population say muddling local law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement will make communities less safe by fostering distrust between police and those they’re sworn to protect and serve. 

Advertisement

The enforcement drive will also hurt the state’s economy, advocates say, by driving off undocumented workers who came to the country to work. 

“This isn’t going after what they think it’s going after,” American Civil Liberties Union of Wyoming Advocacy Director Antonio Serrano said. 

“Wyoming is finally starting to grow. There’s a lot of construction, there’s a lot of stuff going up and immigrants are building that. They’re helping Wyoming grow. In the Wyoming I grew up in, we respected people who wanted to work and work hard.”

Antonio Serrano, who was born and raised in Wyoming to a Mexican father who achieved legal residency, today works as an organizer with the ACLU of Wyoming. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

Undocumented immigrants and their advocates are principally up against the Freedom Caucus, an ascendant political bloc committed to supporting Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda across the board.

The measure to punish errant employers, a bill brought by freshman Rep. Gary Brown, R-Cheyenne, is sparking broader opposition. Lobbyists for the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation and the Wyoming Hospitality and Travel Coalition told WyoFile their members were likely to oppose that measure. 

Advertisement

“We do not support the intentional hiring of illegal workers,” Chris Brown, executive director of the hospitality coalition, said. “We also don’t support new, heavy-handed regulations that could hurt Wyoming’s main street businesses.”

Wyoming farmers’ longtime lobbyist Brett Moline agreed. “For my agricultural guys it’s so hard to get somebody here legally,” he said. “[The federal government] has made it so difficult to get labor legally, that’s why people are coming illegally.” 

State lawmakers are wading into a federal issue, Moline cautioned. “I’m wondering if this is even appropriate for the state. This is something that needs to be settled at the federal level,” he said. 

Rep. Gary Brown listens at the House Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions meeting on Jan. 15, 2025. (Mike Vanata for WyoFile)

Whether business interests will also throw their weight against measures like the driver’s license bill remains to be seen.

House Bill 116, “Driver’s licenses-unauthorized alien restrictions,” would invalidate the licenses issued to undocumented immigrants by as many as 19 states. State legislatures like California’s created such licenses to reduce the number of unlicensed and uninsured drivers on the road, as well as embrace undocumented immigrants they consider valuable to economies and communities. 

That view isn’t shared by many lawmakers in Cheyenne. “In Wyoming, we shouldn’t provide legal privileges to those here illegally,” Rep. Pepper Ottman, a Riverton Republican and the bill’s principal sponsor, wrote in an email to WyoFile. 

Advertisement

Law enforcement chiefs interviewed by WyoFile said they weren’t entirely certain if undocumented immigrants driving with such licenses would be detained. In many cases, they said, offenders would be issued a ticket then — if someone else could take the wheel — travel on. But if not, they may end up stranded or, if there are other criminal charges, even jailed. 

“If you don’t have a driver’s license you can’t drive,” said Col. Tim Cameron, who directs the Wyoming Highway Patrol. “They would need an alternative method of transportation or another driver.” 

Community resources

Community organizers around the state are beginning to network with each other to oppose the bills, and prepare immigrants for increased policing activity by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Serrano said. But the state’s network of immigrant advocates is spread out and somewhat disconnected.

“We’re trying to bring everybody together,” Serrano said. “People are scared and they want to know their rights. [Lawmakers and law enforcement] are sending a lot of signals to immigrant folks that ‘you’re not welcome in Wyoming.’”

The state also has a dearth of attorneys practicing immigration law, both to help people pursue legal status and to defend them in deportation proceedings. 

Advertisement

Rosslyn Read, legal director of the Wyoming Immigrant Advocacy Project, estimated there are six or seven attorneys including herself dedicated to immigration law in the state. Read’s approach is even rarer since she runs a nonprofit and charges clients based on their income. 

Demand for her legal services has skyrocketed, she said, as people scramble for asylum status or to rectify expired work visas. “Supply to demand is totally out of control,” she said of immigrants seeking legal help in a system she views as stacked against them. 

“The rhetoric of ‘just get in line’ is completely false,” she said. “The system is not really designed to encourage authorized immigration.” 

Caucus agenda

Freedom Caucus members see Ottman’s driver’s license bill as another layer of protection against illegal voting. The legislation is a part of the Freedom Caucus’ leading five priorities the bloc hopes to pass out of the House within the first 10 days. It’s also backed by Secretary of State Chuck Gray. 

In a legislative meeting Wednesday, Gray cited one case of someone voting in Wyoming while in the country illegally, in 2020. In 2023 the federal government discovered the fraud and the Campbell County clerk removed the person from the voting roll.

Advertisement

Rep. Joel Guggenmos, also aligned with the caucus, has brought House Bill 133, “Sanctuary cities, counties and prohibition,” which would charge government officials who don’t cooperate with federal immigration authorities with a felony. The charge carries up to five years in prison. 

The bill would ban the passage of any “sanctuary” laws in the state that prevent local law enforcement from sharing information with federal immigration authorities (there are none today), and cut funding to counties or cities that try such legislation. 

Recent conservative attention on Teton County Sheriff Matt Carr is driving the bill, Guggenmos told WyoFile. Carr drew the ire of Wyoming’s Republican Congresswoman Harriet Hageman and conservative state lawmakers when ICE reported Carr did not hold undocumented immigrants in jail until federal agents could collect them for deportation.

“Every elected official and law enforcement agent takes an oath to protect and defend the Constitution,” Guggenmos said. “That is the number one thing that they swear an oath to.” In doing so, Guggenmos said, those officials align themselves with the federal government, whose “number one task is to protect us from foreign invaders.” 

Carr has not held people on ICE detainers — a request from the agency that jails hold people until they can be picked up for deportation — because they are not signed by a judge, according to other news reports.

Advertisement

Carr did not respond to WyoFile requests for comment. But his defenders argue that what really runs afoul of the Constitution is holding people in jail after a judge releases them. 

Federal courts have found ICE detainers to be unconstitutional in some cases, particularly when a sheriff hasn’t entered a legal agreement with the federal government to participate in immigration enforcement.

Read, the Jackson attorney, said she believes Carr does cooperate with ICE, by alerting them to undocumented immigrants who go into the jail. What Hageman and the Freedom Caucus are asking of him goes beyond the law, she said. 

“He and I disagree about this,” Read said. “I wish [Carr] wouldn’t call ICE, but I am defending him because he is doing what is legally required.”

Growing cooperation

Other sheriffs are not hesitating to hold immigrants in their jails for ICE.

Advertisement

Conservatives accuse Carr of ignoring ICE’s requests over a nearly two-year period from February 2023 to mid-December 2024. During the same period, sheriffs in the state’s six most populous counties complied with every detainer they received, according to data provided by ICE. 

A mounting number of sheriffs are now seeking to solidify their relationships with ICE through contracts called 287g agreements. Those agreements allow deputies to serve ICE warrants on people in the jail, streamlining deportations and blunting questions about the legality of holding undocumented immigrants after their release date for the local crime. 

The agreements only cover people brought to jails on suspicion of committing a non-immigration offense. Deputies could not arrest someone solely for being an undocumented immigrant, sheriffs say, and are also not supposed to ask people about their immigration status while conducting police work. But civil liberty advocates say the system is ripe for racial profiling and abuse, if motivated deputies start looking for a way to detain people they think are in the country illegally. 

“People forget how mixed-status families are,” ACLU advocate Antonio Serrano said. “Maybe some of the kids are citizens, but one of them isn’t, or one parent isn’t.”

As a consequence, opponents of the agreements like Read and Serrano say public safety degrades in communities where local law enforcement works closer with the federal government. 

“It’s not just a constitutional or jurisdictional principle,” Read said. “When immigrants don’t trust the police, it hinders the police’s ability to do their jobs and arrest people who are dangerous. If you don’t have cooperative witnesses or [you have] people who are afraid to call and report a crime because it puts their immigration status in jeopardy, it makes everyone less safe.”

Advertisement

Campbell, Carbon and Laramie counties’ sheriffs all emphasized in interviews with WyoFile that their deputies would not be checking immigration status when going about their jobs pulling people over and investigating crimes. 

Laramie County Sheriff Brian Kozak, who is pursuing the more aggressive of the two types of agreements the federal government extends to sheriffs, said he is aware that Cheyenne’s immigrant community might perceive heightened risks from his deputies. He insists that is not the case. 

“We want people to come to us to report crimes,” he said. “Our priority is to get criminals who commit crimes.” 

He will engage in continued community outreach to ensure immigrants in his jurisdiction know that “we are there to help you. If you call us we are going to help you,” he said.

But Kozak is also outspoken about his desire to aid ICE, and he’s generated headlines for his enthusiasm about engaging with federal immigration enforcement. He recently posted a splashy neon “vacancy” sign above his jail door, in the style of a roadside motel, to advertise that he has space to house more detainees, including federal ones. 

Advertisement

The pro-deportation sentiment from the Capitol and sheriffs’ departments will inevitably degrade a sense of trust in Wyoming’s communities, Serrano, the ACLU advocate, said. And if deportations do ramp up to extremes, as Trump is promising, it’s only a matter of time before people being detained and removed from the country start straining Wyoming communities, and families, he said. 

“People forget how mixed-status families are,” he said. “Maybe some of the kids are citizens, but one of them isn’t, or one parent isn’t. It’s going to cause a lot of problems.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending