Connect with us

Seattle, WA

Orioles-Mariners series preview: Heading west to take on a streaking Seattle team

Published

on

Orioles-Mariners series preview: Heading west to take on a streaking Seattle team


After the first two games of the Houston series, it looked like the Orioles might be heading to Seattle with dark clouds hanging over their heads. The O’s were staring down the possibility of starting their West Coast road trip coming off their first sweep in over a year—and at the hands of a team they’re likely to see in the postseason. Instead, the O’s did what good teams do and bounced back with a scrappy victory over the Astros in the series finale. The “not swept” streak lives at 76 and the Orioles arrive in the Pacific Northwest with a renewed sunny outlook.

Both the Orioles and the Mariners come into the series with plenty riding on every win and loss. For Baltimore, the goal is the same it has been since the All-Star break: keep winning and you control your own destiny in the AL East. For Seattle, things are slightly more desperate. The Mariners are currently the first team out of the playoffs, sitting a game and a half behind the Blue Jays for the last Wild Card spot. The good news for M’s fans is they’ve been one of the best teams of the second half. They’ve won six of their last eight series after the All-Star break and come into the matchup with Baltimore on a seven-game winning streak.

The M’s and O’s met once previously this season, with the Orioles taking two out of three in Camden Yards. The highlights from that series included a Ryan McKenna walk-off HR in game two and Kyle Bradish, Danny Coloumbe and Félix Bautista combining to strike out 11 and take the Sunday rubber match.

There also seems to be a friendly rivalry of sorts that is rekindled every time these two teams meet. Seattle, for a team that is all the way across the country, share several inescapable links with the Orioles. Whether it’s Ken Griffey Jr. bouncing HRs off the warehouse in the 1993 Home Run Derby, Cal Ripken Jr. playing his last All-Star Game in Seattle, the Erik Bedard/Adam Jones trade or this year’s All-Star game, the Mariners share in some shining moments from Orioles history.

Advertisement

The O’s would like to reverse some recent history against the M’s, as they haven’t won the season series with Seattle since 2017 and have lost five of their last six series in T-Mobile Park. To take the series, the O’s will have to contend with a Mariners lineup that’s hitting much better in the second half. Over the last 25 games, the Mariners have raised their team average from a paltry .233 in the first half to a respectable .250 in the second half. The M’s have also raised their slugging percentage by 50 points since the All-Star break. That offensive revolution has been largely led by shortstop and leadoff hitter J.P. Crawford, who is slashing .307/.431/.466 since the break.

Game 1: Friday, August 11th, 10:10pm ET, MASN 2

Probable pitchers: Kyle Gibson (11-6, 4.50 ERA, 1.28 WHIP) vs. Luis Castillo (7-7, 3.21 ERA, 1.05 ERA)

Gibson comes into Game 1 after earning his 100th major league win last Saturday against the Mets. Gibson had some of his best swing and miss stuff of the season against New York, generating 17 swings and misses en route to nine strikeouts. The 12-year vet will have something to prove after struggling greatly in his home start against the Mariners. In his worst start of the season, Gibby lasted only three innings against the M’s, giving up seven hits and five earned runs.

Gibson’s sinker was hit particularly hard in the matchup as the Mariners went 5-9 with four singles and a HR against the righty’s primary pitch. Since then, the O’s veteran leader has relied more on his changeup and four-seamer—to great effect. Over his last three starts, he’s holding hitters to a .177 average with a 2.84 average. He’ll look to continue that form in a stadium where he’s often found success throughout his career. In seven career starts at T-Mobile Park, Gibson has a 3.35 ERA.

Opposing Gibson for the Mariners is their All-Star starter Luis Castillo. Since being traded from the Reds to the Mariners at last year’s trade deadline, Castillo has been worth everything Seattle paid to bring him to the Pacific Northwest. In 34 starts for the M’s, Castillo has a 3.20 ERA, 1.07 WHIP and has racked up 232 Ks in 202.2 innings. The 30-year-old has been particularly stingy at T-Mobile Park, holding opponents to a .186 BAA, striking out 11.4 batters per nine innings and posting a 2.36 ERA. Once a pitcher that relied heavily on his changeup, Castillo has become more of a traditional fastball-slider pitcher in Seattle. The slider is Castillo’s go-to out pitch, so look for Ramón Urías and Ryan Mountcastle to tee off on his breaking ball.

Advertisement

Game 2: Saturday, August 12th, 9:40pm ET, MASN 2

Probable pitchers: Cole Irvin (1-3, 5.44 ERA, 1.50 WHIP) vs. George Kirby (10-8, 3.32 ERA, 1.05 WHIP)

If the Friday pitching matchup seems lopsided against the Orioles, the Saturday matchup isn’t much better. With Brandon Hyde making the decision to push back Kyle Bradish’s next start one day, that likely means Cole Irvin gets a spot start against the Mariners.

The good news for Irvin is that he’s plenty familiar with this Seattle team, having spent the last two years playing in the same division with the A’s. The bad news is that Seattle hitters have dominated Irvin any time they’ve come up against him. In six career starts vs. the Mariners, Irvin is 0-6 with an 8.42 ERA, .357 BAA and is giving up a .944 OPS. In his two career starts at T-Mobile park, Irvin allowed nine runs over seven combined innings. If the Orioles decide to give Irvin a short leash and make things more of a bullpen game, that might be their best chance at winning.

Opposing Irvin is another 2023 All-Star in George Kirby. The good news for the Orioles here is that they’re already 1-0 against Kirby this season. The 25-year-old right hander started and lost the series finale back in Baltimore, giving up six hits and three runs (two earned) over 6.1 innings. Kirby’s calling card this season has been his incredibly low walk rate, as he ranks 1st among all qualified starters with a 0.9 BB/9. He couples that with a relatively good chase rate, particularly against his four-seamer and sinker.

Adley Rutschman and Anthony Santander have been the Orioles’ best fastball hitters all season, and Tony Taters even took Kirby deep the last time these teams faced off. The Orioles have excelled at attacking first pitch fastballs all season, so look for them to go after Kirby early. The Mariner’s second-year starter throws his fastball first pitch 35% and works his entire pitch mix off getting early strikes with that four-seamer.

Advertisement

Game 3: Sunday, August 13th, 4:10pm ET, MASN 2

Probable pitchers: Kyle Bradish (7-6, 3.19 ERA, 1.14 WHIP) vs. Bryce Miller (7-4, 4.20 ERA, 1.04 WHIP)

The Orioles would-be ace certainly showed some signs of fatigue in his last start, lasting only 4.2 innings and issuing five walks against the Mets. The hope for Bradish is that the extra day of rest will get him back to pitcher that has regularly taken over games for the Orioles since the beginning of July. In those seven starts since the beginning of last month, Bradish is sporting a 2.27 ERA while limiting opponents to a .208 average and a .616 OPS. His last outing against New York was the only time he didn’t complete 6+ innings and in only two of those seven starts has he allowed 3+ runs. If the playoffs started today, Bradish would be the pitcher most of Birdland would want to see get the ball Game 1.

Bradish has also found plenty of success in his two career starts against Seattle. Last year in Baltimore, he went 4.2 innings against the M’s, allowing only two runs and striking out six in a game Baltimore won 9-2. Then, earlier this season season in Camden Yards, Bradish outdueled Kirby by going seven innings, allowing only two hits and two runs and striking out seven. In that earlier win over the Mariners, Bradish threw the second most sliders he’s throw in any start this season. Most of the top of the Mariners lineup struggle greatly against sliders, so if Bradish can be effective with his location, he could be in for another impressive outing.

Standing in the way of a Bradish and an Orioles win on Sunday will be rookie right-hander Bryce Miller. The former 4th-round draft pick out of Texas A&M has gone through the typical ups and downs you’d expect from a 24-year-old starter in his first season. He’s had some excellent outings; across his first five starts he only allowed four runs total and had three scoreless games. He’s also had some clunkers: eight runs against the Yankees in 4.2 innings, seven runs against Texas over 2.1 innings, and back-to-back starts against Minnesota and Boston where he allowed six runs over 5.2 innings in each.

In his previous start against the O’s, Miller was in line for the loss after giving up three runs over 4.1 innings, though an Orioles bullpen malfunction saved him from taking the L. Miller—who would’ve been Grayson Rodriguez’s college teammate had Grayson honored his commitment to A&M—relies heavily on his fastball. He throws his four-seamer about 65% of the time and the Orioles took advantage of it in their first meeting. The O’s went 5-15 with five singles against Miller’s fastball and were able to put his heater in play nine times. Much like against Kirby, hitters like Rutschman, Santander and Austin Hays will look to tee off on Miller’s heaters and try and get the rookie out of the game early.

Advertisement

**

With Tampa Bay welcoming a scuffling Guardians team to St. Petersburg this weekend, there will be plenty of motivation for the Orioles to beat Seattle to try and maintain (or maybe grow) their three-game lead in the AL East. Meanwhile, for the Mariners they will look to keep up with other Wild Card contenders like Boston and Toronto who face much easier opponents this weekend. The good news for all of Birdland: the O’s still have the best road record in all of baseball and haven’t lost a road series to an AL opponent since the opening series in Boston.

Poll

How many games will the Orioles win in Seattle?

  • 0%
    Three (sweep the M’s)

    (0 votes)

  • 0%
    Zero (the streak ends)

    (0 votes)



0 votes total

Vote Now





Source link

Seattle, WA

Report: Cowboys request interview with Seattle assistant Leslie Frazier

Published

on

Report: Cowboys request interview with Seattle assistant Leslie Frazier


The Cowboys have requested an interview with Seahawks assistant head coach Leslie Frazier, Todd Archer of ESPN reports.

They have an interview scheduled with former Jets head coach Robert Saleh for later this week, per Archer.

If both interviews are in person, that would satisfy the Rooney Rule and allow the Cowboys to make a hire at any point thereafter.

Frazier was the head coach of the Vikings from 2011-13 after taking over as interim coach for the final six games of 2010. He went 21-32-1. This is his first interview request in this hiring cycle.

Advertisement

Frazier, who began his NFL coaching career in 1999, was the Bucs’ defensive coordinator (2014-15), the Ravens’ secondary coach (2016) and the Bills’ defensive coordinator (2017-22) after his stint with the Vikings. He was out of the league in 2023 before Mike Macdonald hired him in Seattle before this season.

Jerry Jones’ eight previous hires for the Cowboys have been either former head coaches and/or have a tie with Jones. Frazier and Saleh both have previous head coaching experience.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Sara Nelson Restarts the Debate About Allowing More Housing in SoDo – The Urbanist

Published

on

Sara Nelson Restarts the Debate About Allowing More Housing in SoDo – The Urbanist


The idea of encouraging more residential development around Seattle’s stadiums had been put on ice in 2023 with the adoption of a citywide maritime and industrial strategy. Nelson’s bill reignites that debate. (King County Metro)

A bill introduced by Seattle Council President Sara Nelson this week is set to reignite a debate over allowing housing on Seattle’s industrial lands and the future of the SoDo neighborhood. The industrial zone in question is immediately west and south of T-Mobile and Lumen stadiums, abutting the Port of Seattle. That debate had been seemingly put to rest with the adoption of a citywide maritime and industrial strategy in 2023 that didn’t add housing in industrial SoDo, following years of debate over the long-term future of Seattle’s industrial areas. This bill is likely going to divide advocates into familiar old camps during a critical year of much bigger citywide housing discussions.

The idea of allowing residential uses around the south downtown stadiums, creating a “Maker’s District” with capacity for around 1,000 new homes, was considered by the City in its original analysis of the environmental impact of changes to its industrial zones in 2022. But including zoning changes needed to permit residential uses within the “stadium transition overlay district,” centered around First Avenue S and Occidental Avenue S, was poised to disrupt the coalition of groups supporting the broader package.

Strongly opposed to the idea is the Port of Seattle, concerned about direct impacts of more development close to its container terminals, but also about encroachment of residential development onto industrial lands more broadly.

The makers district is envisioned as a neighborhood of small semi-industrial uses with residential development above, a type of land use that Seattle has envisioned on paper, but which hasn’t really materialized in reality. (Collinswoerman)

While the zoning change didn’t move forward then, the constituency in favor of it — advocates for the sport stadiums themselves, South Downtown neighborhood groups, and the building trades — haven’t given up on the idea, and seem to have found in Sara Nelson their champion, as the citywide councilmember heads toward a re-election fight.

“There’s an exciting opportunity to create a mixed-use district around the public stadiums, T-Mobile Park and Lumen Field, that prioritizes the development of light industrial “Makers’ Spaces” (think breweries and artisans), one that eases the transition between neighborhoods like Pioneer Square and the Chinatown-International District and the industrial areas to the south,” read a letter sent Monday signed by groups with ties to the Seattle Mariners and the Seattle Seahawks, labor unions including SEIU and IBEW, and housing providers including Plymouth Housing and the Chief Seattle Club. And while Nelson only announced that she was introducing this bill this week, a draft of that letter had been circulating for at least a month, according to meeting materials from T-Mobile Park’s public stadium district.

Advertisement
The area in question targeted by Nelson’s bill is largely focused around Occidental Avenue and First Avenue S, a major truck street. (City of Seattle)

Under city code, 50% of residential units built in Urban Industrial zones — which includes this stadium overlay — have to be maintained as affordable for households making a range of incomes from 60% to 90% of the city’s area median income (AMI) for a minimum of 75 years, depending on the number of bedrooms in each unit. And units are required to have additonal soundproofing and air filtration systems to deal with added noise and pollution of industrial areas.

But unlike in other Urban Industrial (UI) zones, under Nelson’s bill, housing within the stadium transition overlay won’t have to be at least 200 feet from a major truck street, which includes Alaskan Way S, First Avenue S, and Fourth Avenue S. Those streets are some of the most dangerous roadways in the city, and business and freight advocates have fought against redesigning them when the City has proposed doing so in the past.

The timing of the bill’s introduction now is notable, given the fact that the council’s Land Use Committee currently has no chair, after District 2 Councilmember Tammy Morales resigned earlier this month, and the council has just started to ramp up work on reviewing Mayor Bruce Harrell’s final growth strategy and housing plan. Nelson’s own Governance, Accountability, and Economic Development Committee is set to review the bill, giving her full control over her own bill’s trajectory, with Councilmembers Strauss and Rinck — the council’s left flank — left out of initial deliberations since they’re not on Nelson’s committee.

As Nelson brought up the bill in the last five minutes of Monday’s Council Briefing, D6 Councilmember Dan Strauss expressed surprise that this was being introduced and directed to Nelson’s own committee. Strauss, as previous chair of the Land Use Committee, shepherded a lot of the work around the maritime strategy forward, and seemed stunned that this was being proposed without a broader discussion.

“Did I hear you say that we’re going to be taking up the industrial and maritime lands discussion in your committee? There is a lot of work left to do around the stadium district, including the Coast Guard [base],” Strauss said. “I’m quite troubled to hear that we’re taking a one-off approach when there was a real comprehensive plan set up last year and to be kind of caught off guard here on the dais like this, without a desire to have additional discussion.”

On Tuesday, Strauss made a motion to instead send the bill to the Select Committee on the Comprehensive Plan, chaired by D3 Councilmember Joy Hollingsworth. After a long discussion of the merits of keeping the bill in Nelson’s committee, the motion was shot down 5-3, with Councilmembers Kettle and Rinck joining Strauss. During public comment, members of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters specifically asked for the bill to say in Nelson’s committee, a highly unusual move.

Advertisement

Nelson framed her bill Tuesday as being focused on economic development, intended to create more spaces that will allow small industrial-oriented businesses in the city. Nothing prevents those spaces being built now — commercial uses are allowed in the stadium overlay — but Nelson argued that they’ll only come to fruition if builders are allowed to construct housing above that ground-floor retail.

“What is motivating me is the fact that small light industrial businesses need more space in Seattle,” Nelson said. “Two to three makers businesses are leaving Seattle every month or so, simply because commercial spaces are very expensive, and there are some use restrictions for certain businesses. And when we talk about makers businesses, I’m talking about anything from a coffee roaster to a robot manufacturer, places where things are made and sold, and those spaces are hard to find. […] The construction of those businesses is really only feasible if there is something on top, because nobody is going to go out and build a small affordable commercial space for that kind of use”

Opposition from the Port of Seattle doesn’t seem to have let up since 2023.

“Weakening local zoning protections could not come at a worse time for maritime industrial businesses,” Port of Seattle CEO Steve Metruck wrote in a letter to the Seattle Council late last week. “Surrendering maritime industrial zoned land in favor of non-compatible uses like housing invokes a zero-sum game of displacing permanent job centers without creating new ones. Infringing non-compatible uses into maritime industrial lands pushes industry to sprawl outward, making our region more congested, less sustainable, and less globally competitive.”

SoDo is a liquefaction zone constructed on fill over former tideflats and is close to state highways and Port facilities, but not particularly close to amenities like grocery stores and parks. The issue of creating more housing in such a location will likely be a contentious one within Seattle’s housing advocacy world.

Advertisement

Nelson’s move may serve to draw focus away from the larger Comprehensive Plan discussion, a debate about the city’s long-term trajectory on housing. Whether this discussion does ultimately distract from and hinder the push to rezone Seattle’s amenity-rich neighborhoods — places like Montlake, Madrona, and Green Lake — to accommodate more housing remains to be seen.


Ryan Packer has been writing for The Urbanist since 2015, and currently reports full-time as Contributing Editor. Their beats are transportation, land use, public space, traffic safety, and obscure community meetings. Packer has also reported for other regional outlets including Capitol Hill Seattle, BikePortland, Seattle Met, and PubliCola. They live in the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Seattle.



Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Critics say SPS capital levy will result in 'mega schools' and school closures

Published

on

Critics say SPS capital levy will result in 'mega schools' and school closures


When voters send back their ballots in February, they’ll be deciding on replacing two Seattle Public Schools levies that are expiring in 2025.   

Advertisement

The district relies on local voter-approved levies like those to help pay for operations and to fund building construction and repairs. 

What they’re saying:

While the year’s operation’s levy hasn’t had much pushback, critics say the capital levy is causing controversy, including concerns it will lead to school closures.

Advertisement

Some of those affiliated with the Save our Schools group say the capital levy is also prompting concerns that it will lead to “mega schools.”

“Seattle Public Schools has 106 schools. We have facility needs we are going to place before the voters,” said Richard Best, Executive Director of Capital Projects, Planning and Facilities of Seattle Public Schools. 

Advertisement

School officials say there could be serious consequences for students if two propositions fail to pass February 11.

“That would be, I won’t say catastrophic, but there will be declining systems that could have consequential implications in that, when we do implement that system repair, it costs more,” said Best. 

Advertisement

The operations levy would provide schools with $747 million, replacing the last EP&O levy approved in 2022.

It wouldn’t reduce the deficit, but would continue a current funding source, for things like salaries, school security, special education and multilingual support staff.  

This was a breakdown that SPS provided of the operations levy online:

Advertisement

Operations Levy Details 2026-2028

  • Proposed Levy Amount: $747 million
  • Levy Collected: 2026–2028
  • Replaces: Expiring EP&O Levy approved in 2022
  • Current tax rate is 63 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value.

The second proposition, the $1.8 billion Building Excellence Capital Levy, would provide money for building projects and technology. 

Advertisement

This was a breakdown of that proposition by SPS:

Building Excellence VI Capital Levy Details

  • Proposed Amount: $1.8 billion
  • Capital Projects Funding: $1,385,022,403
  • Technology Funding: $$414,977,597
  • Estimated Levy Rates: 93 cents to 79 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value
  • Levy Collected: 2026-2031

A parent who didn’t want to share his name for privacy reasons told us he was concerned about the school closure plan that was scrapped last year, and wondered if the situation was “sustainable.”

Advertisement

Critic Chris Jackins belies the capital levy, as written, could result in the closure of schools.

“This is a continuation of an effort to close more schools,” said Jackins.

Advertisement

He wrote the statement in the voter pamphlet arguing against proposition 2. He says it would allow the construction of “mega schools,” which will in turn be used to then close more schools.   

“On the capital levy, they have two projects which will create two more mega-sized schools, they are both scheduled at 650 students. They both cost more each, more than $148 million,” he said. “They are continuing their construction to add even more elementary school capacity when they say they have too much. It doesn’t make sense.”

The district’s website reads that major renovations and replacement projects would include replacement of at least one elementary school in northeast Seattle.

Advertisement

“The two schools they are talking about, one they didn’t name, so nobody knows, and one is Lowell, which is an existing school, but they are planning to destroy most of it and make it much larger,” Jackins said. 

“I have worked designing schools since 1991 and since that period, I have never designed a school smaller than 500 students,” said Best. “We use a model for 500 students, which is three classrooms per grade level.”

Advertisement

Best explained further.

“The term is not ‘mega schools.’ We design schools to be schools within schools. You have a first-grade cohort, maybe 75 or 100 students. They stay together. Middle schools are 1,000 students. Those are very common throughout the state of Washington.”

Best says school closures aren’t on the table right now, but may be revisited at some point. 

Advertisement

“We are going to engage in the conversation about schools, school capacity, looking at elementary schools, our focus right now is getting these two levies passed,” he said. 

Meantime, Jackins is asking people to vote down the capital levy, and then to ask that it be resubmitted in a form that uses the funds to fix up existing schools in order to keep them open. 

Advertisement

The ballots are expected to go out to voters around January 22. The election is set for February 11.

The Source: Information from this story is from Seattle Public Schools officials and the Save our Schools group.

BEST OF FOX 13 SEATTLE

Advertisement

Washington sees record eviction filings in 2024: ‘Not just an isolated incident’

New 2025 laws that are now in effect in WA

Good Samaritan saves mom from road rage incident in WA

Advertisement

Here’s when you’ll need REAL ID to go through US airport security

REI exits ‘Experiences’ businesses, laying off hundreds of employees

Advertisement

To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.

NewsWashingtonSeattleEducationKing CountySchools
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending